70
Conclusion: Returning to <strong>The</strong> Way <strong>of</strong> Christ … (bringing Jesus' original New Beginning to its rightful End) For starters, it is important for the reader to understand that this treatise is not meant to be a criticism <strong>of</strong> <strong>Paul</strong> himself. Yes, his letters clearly show him to be a man deluded by an incredibly potent psychological elixir – namely, being born into a life <strong>of</strong> unfair privilege while simultaneously harboring a disturbingly low level <strong>of</strong> self-esteem. This combination tempted him to commit atrocious acts <strong>of</strong> violent injustice upon the innocent and create a life which engendered such intense levels <strong>of</strong> internal shame and guilt that he ultimately developed a unique theology to compensate for the same – a theology that begins in an unwashable “original sin” and ends in a faith-activated & grace-granted spiritual redemption that was completely unearned by the “saved” and fully unjust towards the “unworthy.” And yet despite the patent dysfunction with which he operated and the blatant injustices his religion perpetrated (and still perpetrates to this day), it bears noting that I have immense respect for the sincerity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Paul</strong>'s zeal and the passion with which he enlivened the same, as well as an enormous compassion for how obviously lost he felt during his obviously tortured life … Secondly, it is just as important to note that this tome is not meant to be a denouncement <strong>of</strong> Christianity, the modern-day religion founded upon and sustained by the teachings <strong>Paul</strong>. Yes, it is true that <strong>Paul</strong>inist dogma does encourage its Christian adherents to bow down to what amounts to nothing less than a celestial dictatorship 72 (no matter how “loving” or “kind” its tyrant might well be) and to worship Jesus himself in a manner that is nothing short <strong>of</strong> idolatry. 73 And yet that having been said, all those who have chosen to be “humble as a toddler” (see Matthew 18:3-4) must admit that such conservative believers might very well be correct in their assessment <strong>of</strong> the Divine. 74 72 Though some Christians like to claim that the condemned have every opportunity to bow down to Jesus before their bodily death – and thus in effect choose their own damnation when they don't, this argument borders on the ludicrous. Yes, it is true that anyone staunchly adhering to <strong>The</strong> Way <strong>of</strong> Christ (e.g. the true “saints” <strong>of</strong> all the world's religions – including Christianity) would indeed choose Hell over Heaven – if for no other reason than they, as pure adherents <strong>of</strong> Jesus' selfless Way, would want nothing more on their deathbed than to go to Hell and do whatever they could to ease the suffering there – no other humans (other than clinically diagnosed sadomasochists, <strong>of</strong> course) would do so. Indeed, almost every single human being longs to reside in Heaven after he or she dies, and yet according to <strong>Paul</strong>'s “gospel” (again, see Romans 10:9-10 & 1 Corinthians 15:1-4) almost all <strong>of</strong> them will be denied that halcyon reward, and this simply because they didn't “come to Christ” in an appropriate fashion &/or at the appropriate time. Is this benevolence? Is this anything even faintly resembling the “perfect Love” <strong>of</strong> which Jesus spoke in the Sermon on the Mount (see Matthew 5)? Is this punishment even remotely just? Of course not! And I would humbly <strong>of</strong>fer that any human being at all in tune with his or her conscience (the “Advocate within” a la John 14:20-26) knows this to be true. 73 Again, this is a contention vehemently affirmed by Jesus himself throughout the Gospels (see Matthew 19:17, Mark 10:18, Luke 18:19, John 5:41, John 7:16, John 8:50-54, John 12:44, & John 14:28 et al). 74 Of course, if these “evangelical fundamentalists” are indeed correct, then their choice to abide in such a doctrine and worship such a God ironically precludes them from entering the “Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Heaven” that Jesus himself announces in the Gospels. Simply stated, as long as one is primarily concerned about his or her own salvation in the hereafter (instead <strong>of</strong> reaching out selflessly to Care for others come what may) and as long as one arrogantly believes that he or she has exclusive access to God's Will &/or the “correct” interpretation <strong>of</strong> Scripture, then – even though entrance into <strong>Paul</strong>'s believed-in postmortem Paradise might indeed be granted him or her -- there will be no entrance into the “Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Heaven” that Jesus came to <strong>of</strong>fer his true followers; a state <strong>of</strong> perfect bliss that exists in every present moment <strong>of</strong> this current lifetime (see Matthew 10:7 & Luke 17:20-21 et al); a Kingdom that can only be accessed by those who set aside their selfish arrogance (see Matthew 18:3-4 & Matthew 23:12) in favor <strong>of</strong> humbly & courageously walking <strong>The</strong> Way <strong>of</strong> selfless LOVE – by those who choose to make their lives about caring for and serving others instead <strong>of</strong> themselves (see John 13:15-17, John 14:15, & John 15:12 et al); especially the downtrodden in their communities (a la Matthew 25:35-40) &/or the enemies in their midst (a la Matthew 5:44-48 & Luke 10:29-37). 71
- Page 1 and 2:
The Cult of Paul examining the cont
- Page 3 and 4:
“For the time is coming when peop
- Page 5 and 6:
“I have set you an example, that
- Page 7 and 8:
Forward … the WHY of it all While
- Page 9 and 10:
And yet as far as this particular t
- Page 11 and 12:
An introductory look at Paul of Tar
- Page 13 and 14:
“Now as Saul was going along and
- Page 15 and 16:
A few of the Bible's“smaller hint
- Page 17 and 18:
*Paul downplays the innate holiness
- Page 19 and 20: "Paul avoids quoting the teaching o
- Page 21 and 22: As the previous pages have shown, t
- Page 23 and 24: In marked contrast, Jesus is seen t
- Page 25 and 26: Contrast #04: their affiliations wi
- Page 27 and 28: Contrast #07: how they dealt with t
- Page 29 and 30: Jesus & Paul: a look at their perso
- Page 31 and 32: Contrast #12: Paul's condemnation &
- Page 33 and 34: In quite marked contrast, Jesus Chr
- Page 35 and 36: And finally, where Paul is frequent
- Page 37 and 38: *Paul lied to King Agrippa about hi
- Page 39 and 40: Jesus & Paul: a look at their preac
- Page 41 and 42: Jesus Christ, on the other hand, ma
- Page 43 and 44: In marked contrast, while it is tru
- Page 45 and 46: *Paul was inconsistent in his teach
- Page 47 and 48: *Just as revealing, every single on
- Page 49 and 50: Jesus & Paul: their conflicting the
- Page 51 and 52: Conflict #03: Paul guided by conven
- Page 53 and 54: In truth, in the Gospel of Matthew
- Page 55 and 56: Conflict #05: Paul believing God to
- Page 57 and 58: And yet the nature of God is not th
- Page 59 and 60: Conflict #06: Paul believing God to
- Page 61 and 62: Conflict #08: Paul equating the “
- Page 63 and 64: Finally, and in full harmony with t
- Page 65 and 66: Even the parable of The Sower in th
- Page 67 and 68: Paul: an apostle of delightful iron
- Page 69: “There is, on the one hand, the a
- Page 73 and 74: As such, now that the dichotomy bet
- Page 75 and 76: “The body that is sown is perisha
- Page 77: “I praise You, Father, Lord of he