27.11.2018 Views

20181119 BS EDITED TechStream Handbook WIP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

These procedural rights of an employee are important — if the employee is deprived of any of his/her<br />

rights, it may make the entire disciplinary process being unfair.<br />

If the employee charged with misconduct is also a trade union representative (shop steward), the<br />

company must ensure that the trade union is informed of the charge, and that consultations take<br />

place with the trade union in respect of the disciplinary charges brought against the representative.<br />

This also applies in cases where the employee is an office-bearer or official of a trade union.<br />

2.1.7.6 The Chairperson of the Hearing<br />

The chairperson of the hearing should be objective and neutral in respect of both the employee and<br />

the manager/coordinator who conducted the investigation.<br />

The chairperson should not have been involved, directly or indirectly, in the misconduct itself and<br />

cannot be a witness, for example, or the victim of an assault.<br />

The chairperson bears considerable responsibility for ensuring that the employee receives a fair<br />

hearing.<br />

The chairperson should be someone of a rank or position either similar or higher than the<br />

manager/coordinator who conducted the investigation, and, if possible, a position higher than the<br />

employee charged with misconduct. The company may also appoint an external person to chair the<br />

disciplinary hearing.<br />

The chairperson must maintain order in the disciplinary enquiry.<br />

There is no need for the chairperson to take any decision immediately, but rather may take time to<br />

consider the decision.<br />

2.1.7.7 Deciding on an appropriate sancion<br />

The employee may state reasons why he/she should not be dismissed or why a certain disciplinary<br />

sanction should not be applied. The employee may lead evidence in mitigation of the disciplinary<br />

offence. This may include a long and unblemished disciplinary record, provocation, heat-of-themoment<br />

actions, or even the personal circumstances of an employee.<br />

The following factors may be relevant in deciding the appropriate sanction:<br />

• The nature and seriousness of the offence;<br />

• The impact of the misconduct on workplace relationships;<br />

• The likelihood of the misconduct being repeated;<br />

• The need to act consistently — similar cases being treated similarly;<br />

• The personal circumstances of the employee.<br />

<strong>TechStream</strong> Global Limited, Annexe A, Long Kloof Studios, Darters Road, Gardens, Cape Town, South Africa,<br />

8001 Tel: +27 (0) 21 422 0851 W: www.<strong>TechStream</strong>global.com<br />

Prod 03/2017. Page | 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!