18.12.2012 Views

Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition Sustaining Food ...

Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition Sustaining Food ...

Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition Sustaining Food ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Swidden</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g, also know as shift<strong>in</strong>g cultivation or milpa <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America, is<br />

conventionally def<strong>in</strong>ed as “an agricultural system <strong>in</strong> which temporary clear<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />

cropped for fewer years than they are allowed to rema<strong>in</strong> fallow” (Sanchez, 1976). While<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly correct, this def<strong>in</strong>ition reflects a Western or modern emphasis on the relatively<br />

short period when annual food and other crops are grown. <strong>Swidden</strong> can also be thought<br />

of as forest farm<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce the fallow period is typically long, managed and often<br />

cultivated as well, although with perennial species rather than annuals.<br />

Irrespective of the emphasis, swidden is a rotational form of agriculture that applies<br />

natural vegetative processes as a means of replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility and controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive weeds. The practice evolved <strong>in</strong>dependently throughout the world and varies <strong>in</strong><br />

response to site-specific ecological, socio-economic and cultural conditions. <strong>Swidden</strong><br />

systems have proven to be productive and susta<strong>in</strong>able adaptations to challeng<strong>in</strong>g<br />

environmental conditions that feature high labor productivity at low population densities<br />

(Cairns, 2007). <strong>Swidden</strong> agriculture, often pejoratively called slash and burn, has had a<br />

poor reputation and been actively suppressed from colonial to contemporary times.<br />

In this powerpo<strong>in</strong>t, I consider swidden practices utiliz<strong>in</strong>g the framework developed by<br />

the classic swidden researcher, Dr. Hal Conkl<strong>in</strong> (1957). He differentiated two shift<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cultivation systems: 1) <strong>in</strong>tegral, which he described as productive, susta<strong>in</strong>able, carefully<br />

regulated and managed through social norms, cultural traditions and religious practices<br />

and that <strong>in</strong>corporated rich traditional ecological knowledge and practice and 2) <strong>in</strong>cipient ,<br />

which are more <strong>in</strong>tensive, destructive and unsusta<strong>in</strong>able practices often used by recent<br />

migrants who lack site-specific TEKP and have little management capacity. I consider<br />

explanations for the breakdown of <strong>in</strong>tegral swidden systems, and what contemporary<br />

agriculture, conservation and development efforts might learn from these age-old forest<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g practices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!