Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition Sustaining Food ...
Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition Sustaining Food ...
Swidden Agriculture: Ancient Systems in Transition Sustaining Food ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Swidden</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g, also know as shift<strong>in</strong>g cultivation or milpa <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America, is<br />
conventionally def<strong>in</strong>ed as “an agricultural system <strong>in</strong> which temporary clear<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />
cropped for fewer years than they are allowed to rema<strong>in</strong> fallow” (Sanchez, 1976). While<br />
certa<strong>in</strong>ly correct, this def<strong>in</strong>ition reflects a Western or modern emphasis on the relatively<br />
short period when annual food and other crops are grown. <strong>Swidden</strong> can also be thought<br />
of as forest farm<strong>in</strong>g, s<strong>in</strong>ce the fallow period is typically long, managed and often<br />
cultivated as well, although with perennial species rather than annuals.<br />
Irrespective of the emphasis, swidden is a rotational form of agriculture that applies<br />
natural vegetative processes as a means of replenish<strong>in</strong>g soil fertility and controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>vasive weeds. The practice evolved <strong>in</strong>dependently throughout the world and varies <strong>in</strong><br />
response to site-specific ecological, socio-economic and cultural conditions. <strong>Swidden</strong><br />
systems have proven to be productive and susta<strong>in</strong>able adaptations to challeng<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environmental conditions that feature high labor productivity at low population densities<br />
(Cairns, 2007). <strong>Swidden</strong> agriculture, often pejoratively called slash and burn, has had a<br />
poor reputation and been actively suppressed from colonial to contemporary times.<br />
In this powerpo<strong>in</strong>t, I consider swidden practices utiliz<strong>in</strong>g the framework developed by<br />
the classic swidden researcher, Dr. Hal Conkl<strong>in</strong> (1957). He differentiated two shift<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cultivation systems: 1) <strong>in</strong>tegral, which he described as productive, susta<strong>in</strong>able, carefully<br />
regulated and managed through social norms, cultural traditions and religious practices<br />
and that <strong>in</strong>corporated rich traditional ecological knowledge and practice and 2) <strong>in</strong>cipient ,<br />
which are more <strong>in</strong>tensive, destructive and unsusta<strong>in</strong>able practices often used by recent<br />
migrants who lack site-specific TEKP and have little management capacity. I consider<br />
explanations for the breakdown of <strong>in</strong>tegral swidden systems, and what contemporary<br />
agriculture, conservation and development efforts might learn from these age-old forest<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g practices.