09.05.2019 Views

From the Death of Saul to the Death of David - Flavius Josephus

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> citadel also; by what authority we do not now know perhaps, after<br />

<strong>David</strong> had united <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r, or joined <strong>the</strong> citadel <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower city,<br />

as sect. 2, <strong>Josephus</strong> esteemed <strong>the</strong>m as one city. However, this notion<br />

seems <strong>to</strong> be confirmed by what <strong>the</strong> same <strong>Josephus</strong> says concerning<br />

<strong>David</strong>'s and many o<strong>the</strong>r kings <strong>of</strong> Judah's sepulchers, which as <strong>the</strong><br />

authors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> books <strong>of</strong> Kings and Chronicles say were in <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>David</strong>, so does <strong>Josephus</strong> still say <strong>the</strong>y were in Jerusalem. The sepulcher<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>David</strong> seems <strong>to</strong> have been also a known place in <strong>the</strong> several days <strong>of</strong><br />

Hyrcanus, <strong>of</strong> Herod, and <strong>of</strong> St. Peter, Antiq. B. XIII. ch. 8. sect. 4 B.<br />

XVI. ch. 8. sect. 1; Acts 2:29. Now no such royal sepulchers have been<br />

found about Mount Sion, but are found close by <strong>the</strong> north wall <strong>of</strong><br />

Jerusalem, which I suspect, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>to</strong> be <strong>the</strong>se very sepulchers. See<br />

<strong>the</strong> note on ch. 15. sect. 3. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>Josephus</strong>'s explication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

lame, and <strong>the</strong> blind, and <strong>the</strong> maimed, as set <strong>to</strong> keep this city or citadel,<br />

seems <strong>to</strong> be <strong>the</strong> truth, and gives <strong>the</strong> best light <strong>to</strong> that his<strong>to</strong>ry in our Bible.<br />

Mr. Ottius truly observes, (up. Hayercamp, p. 305,) that <strong>Josephus</strong> never<br />

mentions Mount Sion by that name, as taking it for an appellative, as I<br />

suppose, and not for a proper name; he still ei<strong>the</strong>r styles it The Citadel,<br />

or The Upper City; nor do I see any reason for Mr. Ottius's evil<br />

suspicions about this procedure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Josephus</strong>.<br />

2. Some copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Josephus</strong> have here Solyma, or Salem; and o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Hierosolyma, or Jerusalem. The latter best agree <strong>to</strong> what <strong>Josephus</strong> says<br />

elsewhere, (Of <strong>the</strong> War, B. VI. ch. 10.,) that this city was called Solyma,<br />

or Salem, before <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong> Melchisedec, but was by him called<br />

Hierosolyma, or Jerusalem. I ra<strong>the</strong>r suppose it <strong>to</strong> have been so called<br />

after Abraham had received that oracle Jehovah Jireh, "The Lord will<br />

see, or provide," Genesis 22;14. The latter word, Jireh, with a little<br />

alteration, prefixed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> old name Salem, Peace, will be Jerusalem; and<br />

since that expression, "God will see," or ra<strong>the</strong>r, "God will provide<br />

himself a lamb for a burnt-<strong>of</strong>fering," ver. 8, 14, is <strong>the</strong>re said <strong>to</strong> have been<br />

proverbial till <strong>the</strong> days <strong>of</strong> Moses, this seems <strong>to</strong> me <strong>the</strong> most probable<br />

derivation <strong>of</strong> that name, which will <strong>the</strong>n denote that God would provide<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!