DCN AUGUST Edition 2019
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NEWS IN BRIEF<br />
Wharfie used as union “front man”, judge rules<br />
A Federal Court Judge dismissed a challenge to an<br />
enterprise agreement on Melbourne’s docks, ruling the<br />
application was a “front man” for the MUA/CFMMEU.<br />
The applicant was Richard Lunt, a former wharfie at Victoria<br />
International Container Terminal, whose dismissal in late 2017<br />
triggered large protests at Webb Dock.<br />
The MUA had sought to overturn the VICT enterprise<br />
agreement which it did not negotiate and regarded as<br />
undermining workers’ conditions.<br />
The Fair Work Commission and the Australian Maritime<br />
Officers’ Union were also respondents.<br />
After hearing evidence, Justice Darryl Rangiah dismissed<br />
the case. “I am satisfied that Mr Lunt has not brought the<br />
current proceeding for the predominant purpose of vindicating<br />
his own legal rights,” Justice Rangiah said.<br />
“Instead, Mr Lunt has brought the proceeding for the<br />
predominant purpose of enabling the CFMMEU to obtain relief<br />
which it was unlikely to obtain if the proceedings were brought<br />
in its own name.<br />
“In my opinion, that is an illegitimate and collateral purpose.”<br />
The judge said the CFMMEU was the “true moving party”.<br />
“It is the true moving party because it has used Mr Lunt to<br />
seek the relief that it fears it would not obtain if it brought the<br />
proceeding in its own name,” Justice Rangiah said.<br />
“Through the device of the CFMMEU using Mr Lunt as a<br />
‘front man’, VICT has been deprived of the opportunity to<br />
defend the proceedings on the basis that the MUA acquiesced<br />
in the approval that is now sought to be quashed.”<br />
Justice Rangiah dismissed the case on the basis of it being<br />
“an abuse of process”.<br />
VICT has indicated it intends to seek costs.<br />
Mr Lunt was represented in court by one of Australia’s<br />
foremost barristers, Herman Borenstein QC, who acted for the<br />
Maritime Union against Patrick during the 1998 dispute.<br />
QUBE MAKES BID FOR CHALMERS<br />
Maersk announces<br />
“carbon-neutral”<br />
transport trial<br />
Shipping giant Maersk has announced it is beginning trials of a<br />
“carbon neutral” fuel, said to be the first of its kind in the industry.<br />
The fuel is being piloted with select Maersk customers, starting<br />
with H&M Group as the first company to conduct a trial as part of<br />
a shift towards carbon-neutral transport.<br />
The biofuel is a blend of used cooking oil and heavy oil that has<br />
been tested and validated in a trial done in collaboration with the<br />
Dutch Sustainability Growth Coalition and Shell. It is certified as<br />
a sustainable fuel by the International Sustainability & Carbon<br />
Certification.<br />
“The biofuel trial on board Mette Maersk has proven that<br />
decarbonised solutions for shipping can already be utilised today,<br />
both technically and operationally,” Maersk chief operations officer<br />
Søren Toft said.<br />
“While it is not yet an absolutely final solution it is certainly<br />
part of the solution and it can serve as a transition solution to<br />
reduce CO 2<br />
emissions today.”<br />
QUBE announced a takeover bid for fellow logistics<br />
business, Chalmers Limited, a move already supported<br />
publicly by the latter’s chairman.<br />
The proposal valued Chalmers shares at about $60m.<br />
Qube managing director Maurice James said the offer<br />
provided “an opportunity for Chalmers shareholders to<br />
obtain liquidity for their shares at an attractive premium”.<br />
“The structure of the offer enables Chalmers<br />
shareholders to elect to cash out their Chalmers shares or,<br />
by electing the scrip option, to share in the growth of the<br />
Qube Group,” Mr James said.<br />
Chalmers’ chairman, Graham Mulligan said the offer<br />
represented attractive value for Chalmers shareholders.<br />
“The directors of Chalmers intend to unanimously<br />
recommend that Chalmers shareholders accept [the<br />
Qube] off-market takeover offer for all the ordinary shares<br />
in Chalmers, in the absence of a superior proposal,” Mr<br />
Mulligan said.<br />
According to the Qube statement to the ASX, the<br />
Chalmers transport and logistics operations, coupled with<br />
the company’s property assets (in Melbourne and Brisbane),<br />
are complementary to those of Qube.<br />
The offer was conditional upon Qube acquiring a relevant<br />
interest in 90% of Chalmers shares.<br />
Maurice James<br />
Allie Caulfield; Qube<br />
12 August <strong>2019</strong><br />
thedcn.com.au