11.09.2019 Views

12092019

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOUTH Africa has an acute<br />

problem with xenophobia.<br />

That goes without saying. The<br />

recent wave of xenophobic attacks<br />

on Nigerians and other Africans<br />

was just one of such appalling<br />

incidences. It is a terrible stain on<br />

the reputation of a country that<br />

calls itself the “rainbow nation”!<br />

Yet, Nigeria did not cover itself in<br />

glory with the reprisal attacks and<br />

unsavoury calls for retribution.<br />

South Africa’s xenophobia is vile,<br />

but Nigeria has no claim to moral<br />

superiority on hate-filled<br />

violence. Its moral outrage<br />

smacks of the pot calling the kettle<br />

black. Let’s start with the kettle:<br />

South Africa.<br />

Truth is, there is an ingrained<br />

culture of violence among Black<br />

South Africans, seared by<br />

decades of brutal apartheid rule.<br />

When they stopped attacking the<br />

Whites as apartheid neared its<br />

end, they turned on one another.<br />

In the early 1990s, Black-on-<br />

Black violence between<br />

supporters of the Inkatha<br />

Freedom Party and the African<br />

National Congress claimed over<br />

15,000 lives. But since the end of<br />

apartheid in 1994, South African<br />

violent streak took a xenophobic<br />

form, as Black South Africans<br />

turned on foreigners.<br />

As I said, the recent xenophobic<br />

attacks were only the latest in a<br />

series of attacks on foreigners,<br />

dating back several years. In<br />

2015, hundreds of South African<br />

youths looted and burned shops<br />

belonging to foreign nationals,<br />

asking them to “return to their<br />

home countries”. Similar<br />

xenophobic attacks took place in<br />

2008, when a wave of antiimmigration<br />

violence left about 62<br />

people dead. Two years earlier,<br />

in 2006, xenophobic riots broke<br />

out for several months in Cape<br />

Town. But what we call<br />

xenophobia is, in fact, Afrophobia,<br />

the hatred of fellow Africans. As<br />

the then South African police<br />

minister, Nathi Nhleko, said after<br />

the 2015 attacks, there was<br />

widespread Afrophobia in South<br />

Africa. The country’s current<br />

foreign minister Naledi Pandor<br />

said the same thing following the<br />

recent violence: there is a<br />

prejudice in South Africa against<br />

people from other African<br />

countries.<br />

This is very sad. Why would<br />

Black South Africans hate their<br />

fellow Africans? Have they<br />

forgotten so quickly how Nigeria,<br />

and other African countries,<br />

supported their struggle against<br />

apartheid? How could they forget,<br />

for instance, that Nigeria<br />

harboured several prominent<br />

ANC exiles, and made significant<br />

financial and diplomatic<br />

contributions to help accelerate<br />

the collapse of apartheid? As<br />

President Jacob Zuma said in<br />

2015, the solidarity of other<br />

African countries “was critical to<br />

achieving the freedom and<br />

democracy we are enjoying<br />

today”. Sadly, South African<br />

youths, even some of their elders,<br />

hardly remember that today!<br />

But let’s face it, poverty and<br />

inequality also play a key role in<br />

fuelling the xenophobic attacks.<br />

South Africa is one of the world’s<br />

most unequal countries, with one<br />

of the highest unemployment<br />

rates, currently at 29 per cent.<br />

Over 10 million South Africans<br />

are unemployed and half the<br />

country live below the poverty<br />

line. Yet, out of the country’s 55<br />

million-strong population, two<br />

Vanguard, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2019—31<br />

million, with 800,000 of them<br />

Nigerians, are foreign born.<br />

When you have a large visible<br />

immigrant community in a<br />

country amid widespread poverty<br />

and inequality among the locals,<br />

xenophobia is not far away.<br />

Poverty and inequality tend to<br />

breed the resentment of<br />

foreigners.<br />

Of course, xenophobia is not a<br />

uniquely South African problem.<br />

It is a world problem! What is<br />

unique about South Africa’s<br />

brand of xenophobia is the violent<br />

element. Sadly, South Africans<br />

have allowed their fear of<br />

immigrants to have a violent<br />

streak. There is absolutely no<br />

excuse for any form of violence.<br />

Which brings us to Nigeria.<br />

The reactions in this country to<br />

the xenophobic attacks in South<br />

Africa have been frenetic, even<br />

hysterical. Of course, Nigeria has<br />

a right to protest the ill treatment<br />

of its citizens in another country.<br />

Yet, what I have read and seen in<br />

the newspapers over the past two<br />

weeks smacks of confected<br />

indignation, an unconvincing<br />

claim to the moral high ground.<br />

There were reprisal attacks on<br />

South African companies in<br />

Nigeria, forcing, as one<br />

newspaper said, MTN to “shut<br />

offices nationwide”. That’s<br />

irrational because responding to<br />

xenophobic violence in South<br />

Africa by attacking its commercial<br />

interests in Nigeria risks<br />

damaging investor confidence<br />

and, thus, Nigeria’s economy.<br />

Sadly, even some prominent<br />

Nigerians were advocating farreaching<br />

economic sanctions.<br />

President Buhari’s party, All<br />

Dealing with the zeitgeist of South Africa’s xenophobia<br />

By PATRICK OBAHIAGBON<br />

THE incidents of xenophobic attacks<br />

in South Africa by South Africans,<br />

with Nigerians very largely as targets,<br />

have been characteristic and assumed<br />

nauseating dimensions. The rising orgy<br />

of killings and arsons has been quite<br />

worrisome. One wonders what offence<br />

Nigeria and Nigerians have committed<br />

to become consistent victims of<br />

xenophobia that has almost assumed a<br />

genocidal dimension.<br />

This is a strange comeuppance, given<br />

the huge investments - especially<br />

pecuniary, totalling over $60 billion - that<br />

Nigeria deployed in South Africa and<br />

Southern Africa to torpedo the apartheid<br />

regime foisted on the former British<br />

colonies by the minority White in cruel<br />

circumvention of the rights of the<br />

majority South African and Southern<br />

African Blacks.<br />

One had expected that South Africa,<br />

in particular, should, indeed, have<br />

always treated Nigeria as a<br />

compassionate big brother in the<br />

ramifications of the successful antiapartheid<br />

struggle. A celebratory attitude<br />

towards all issues that are Nigerian by<br />

the government and people of South<br />

Africa should have been taken for granted<br />

and as a matter of course to which fidelity<br />

should be kept as a directive principle<br />

of state policy.<br />

It is insalubrious and opprobrious that<br />

the good gesture by Nigeria had not<br />

found anchorage in a reciprocal gesture<br />

by South Africa; in which case the<br />

present leadership under President Cyril<br />

Ramaphosa, cannot escape essential<br />

South Africa’s xenophobia and<br />

Nigeria’s moral relativism<br />

indictment for the rising complexities<br />

and waves of debilitating xenophobic<br />

assaults on the significant other Blacks<br />

of foreign origin.<br />

To be sure, whereas post-apartheid<br />

South African presidents, particularly the<br />

late legendary and inimitable Nelson<br />

Mandela and other well-meaning,<br />

perceptive, perspicacious and temperate<br />

leaders of the anti-apartheid struggle,<br />

had worked so hard at continental amity,<br />

it is a harsh and corrosive verdict of<br />

history that the wheel of brotherhood is<br />

being reinvented by South Africa under<br />

President Ramaphosa.<br />

While it may not be correct to assert<br />

that xenophobia was alien to South Africa<br />

before the coming of Ramaphosa, the<br />

sheer magnitude of his body language<br />

had, without a doubt, encouraged an<br />

unprecedented renewed revulsion by<br />

South Africans for other foreign<br />

nationals, especially Blacks of African<br />

descent.<br />

His deputy minister of Police Affairs,<br />

Mr. Bongani Michael Mkongi, had<br />

recently endorsed the spate of<br />

xenophobic attacks wherein he referred<br />

to the activities of foreigners who were<br />

involved in legitimate business as<br />

tantamount to economic sabotage to<br />

South Africa. The ruling African<br />

National Congress, ANC, in South Africa<br />

does not seem to find anything wrong<br />

about these wanton killings, attacks on<br />

foreign nationals and looting of the<br />

businesses of foreign nationals;<br />

otherwise, it should have condemned the<br />

madness in the strongest terms possible.<br />

In the circumstance, it would be<br />

Responding to<br />

xenophobic violence in<br />

South Africa by<br />

attacking its<br />

commercial interests in<br />

Nigeria risks damaging<br />

investor confidence,<br />

Nigeria’s economy<br />

impracticable to expect a South African<br />

government under Ramaphosa’s<br />

presidency to demonstrate a political will<br />

to decisively address the scourge.<br />

Therefore, it is delicate for Nigeria, in<br />

particular, to continue to maintain<br />

diplomatic niceties in the face of real<br />

danger to her policy of citizen diplomacy.<br />

The attitude and body language of<br />

Ramaphosa’s government have not<br />

helped matters at all.<br />

The fact that no single South African<br />

had been arrested, tried and sentenced<br />

to prison for these dastardly acts<br />

reinforces the complicity of Ramaphosa’s<br />

government, which has negative<br />

implications for South Africa’s acclaimed<br />

good faith in the crystalisation of<br />

The South African way is<br />

not the appropriate<br />

trajectory to global<br />

humanism<br />

bilateral, multilateral and diplomatic<br />

relations. This is the reason the blame<br />

for the recent upsurge in xenophobic<br />

attacks should be laid at Ramaphosa’s<br />

feet.<br />

In the absence of expeditious and<br />

clearly effective and reinforcing positive<br />

actions by the South African government<br />

to halt this festering madness, protect<br />

the life and property of Nigerians and<br />

other foreign nationals and preserve<br />

their right to legitimate businesses, I will<br />

be at great pains not to concur with the<br />

call by the National Chair of the All<br />

Progressives Congress, APC, Comrade<br />

Adams Oshiomhole, for the<br />

Send Opinions & Letters to:<br />

opinions1234@yahoo.com<br />

Progressives Congress, called on<br />

the president to “nationalise”<br />

South Africa’s companies in<br />

Nigeria. The party’s national<br />

chairman, Adams Oshiomhole,<br />

asked Nigerians to stop<br />

patronising MTN and other<br />

South African companies in<br />

Nigeria, and called on the<br />

government to revoke the landing<br />

right of the South African Airways,<br />

adding that “it shouldn’t have the<br />

right to fly in any part of Nigeria”.<br />

So, instead of exercising selfrestraint,<br />

as expected of any<br />

responsible party and politician,<br />

Nigeria’s ruling party and its<br />

chairman are whipping up<br />

reckless populist sentiments.<br />

Yet, consider this. According to<br />

Xenowatch, xenophobic attacks<br />

in South Africa have claimed 309<br />

lives and displaced 100,000<br />

people in 24 years, between 1994<br />

and 2018. Few of those are<br />

Nigerians. But, in 2018 alone,<br />

according to Human Right<br />

Watch, Boko Haram killed at least<br />

1,200 people and forced the<br />

displacement of 200,000; while<br />

herdsmen killed at least 1,600<br />

people, causing the displacement<br />

of 300,000!<br />

Ethnic and religious attacks<br />

have claimed more Nigerian<br />

lives than South African<br />

xenophobic attacks. Yet, where is<br />

the moral indignation? Where is<br />

the justice for the victims? How<br />

many people have boycotted<br />

herdsmen’s cows? Is it more<br />

tolerable when Nigerians kill<br />

Nigerians than when South<br />

Africans kill Nigerians? Judging<br />

by the reactions to the xenophobic<br />

attacks, the answer is yes. The<br />

moral relativism is galling!<br />

nationalisation of South African<br />

businesses in Nigeria.<br />

After all, the volume of trade between<br />

Nigeria and South Africa tilts in favour<br />

of South Africa. South African companies<br />

in Nigeria repatriate about $60 billion<br />

to their home country, whereas Nigeria<br />

is less disadvantaged in this regard. It<br />

is rankling that due to their laissez faire<br />

lifestyle of hedonism, epicureanism and<br />

riotous modus-vivendi, envious South<br />

African youths who depend on their<br />

government for social security benefits,<br />

would unleash terror, pains and death<br />

on Nigerians, in particular, and other<br />

foreign nationals, for their industry and<br />

resourcefulness. This is a queer macabre<br />

sense of vengeance against a people<br />

whose only offence is the obvious reward<br />

they derive from a competitive South<br />

African economy for their investments<br />

and hard work.<br />

Xenophobia has afflicted the South<br />

African spirit and inured their<br />

sensibilities. It is a misplaced zeitgeist<br />

that must be condemned by the global<br />

community. The United Nations must<br />

lend its stentorian voice in condemnation<br />

of the dastardly and beastly act. What<br />

we need more than ever before is<br />

continental and global peace. The South<br />

African way is not the appropriate<br />

trajectory to global humanism. South<br />

Africa must be made to respect the rights<br />

and preserve the life and property of<br />

legal migrants; otherwise, it should<br />

resort to becoming an insular nation,<br />

having no dealings with the rest of the<br />

human world.<br />

•Hon. Obahiagbon contributed this<br />

piece from Benin City.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!