Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SOUTH Africa has an acute<br />
problem with xenophobia.<br />
That goes without saying. The<br />
recent wave of xenophobic attacks<br />
on Nigerians and other Africans<br />
was just one of such appalling<br />
incidences. It is a terrible stain on<br />
the reputation of a country that<br />
calls itself the “rainbow nation”!<br />
Yet, Nigeria did not cover itself in<br />
glory with the reprisal attacks and<br />
unsavoury calls for retribution.<br />
South Africa’s xenophobia is vile,<br />
but Nigeria has no claim to moral<br />
superiority on hate-filled<br />
violence. Its moral outrage<br />
smacks of the pot calling the kettle<br />
black. Let’s start with the kettle:<br />
South Africa.<br />
Truth is, there is an ingrained<br />
culture of violence among Black<br />
South Africans, seared by<br />
decades of brutal apartheid rule.<br />
When they stopped attacking the<br />
Whites as apartheid neared its<br />
end, they turned on one another.<br />
In the early 1990s, Black-on-<br />
Black violence between<br />
supporters of the Inkatha<br />
Freedom Party and the African<br />
National Congress claimed over<br />
15,000 lives. But since the end of<br />
apartheid in 1994, South African<br />
violent streak took a xenophobic<br />
form, as Black South Africans<br />
turned on foreigners.<br />
As I said, the recent xenophobic<br />
attacks were only the latest in a<br />
series of attacks on foreigners,<br />
dating back several years. In<br />
2015, hundreds of South African<br />
youths looted and burned shops<br />
belonging to foreign nationals,<br />
asking them to “return to their<br />
home countries”. Similar<br />
xenophobic attacks took place in<br />
2008, when a wave of antiimmigration<br />
violence left about 62<br />
people dead. Two years earlier,<br />
in 2006, xenophobic riots broke<br />
out for several months in Cape<br />
Town. But what we call<br />
xenophobia is, in fact, Afrophobia,<br />
the hatred of fellow Africans. As<br />
the then South African police<br />
minister, Nathi Nhleko, said after<br />
the 2015 attacks, there was<br />
widespread Afrophobia in South<br />
Africa. The country’s current<br />
foreign minister Naledi Pandor<br />
said the same thing following the<br />
recent violence: there is a<br />
prejudice in South Africa against<br />
people from other African<br />
countries.<br />
This is very sad. Why would<br />
Black South Africans hate their<br />
fellow Africans? Have they<br />
forgotten so quickly how Nigeria,<br />
and other African countries,<br />
supported their struggle against<br />
apartheid? How could they forget,<br />
for instance, that Nigeria<br />
harboured several prominent<br />
ANC exiles, and made significant<br />
financial and diplomatic<br />
contributions to help accelerate<br />
the collapse of apartheid? As<br />
President Jacob Zuma said in<br />
2015, the solidarity of other<br />
African countries “was critical to<br />
achieving the freedom and<br />
democracy we are enjoying<br />
today”. Sadly, South African<br />
youths, even some of their elders,<br />
hardly remember that today!<br />
But let’s face it, poverty and<br />
inequality also play a key role in<br />
fuelling the xenophobic attacks.<br />
South Africa is one of the world’s<br />
most unequal countries, with one<br />
of the highest unemployment<br />
rates, currently at 29 per cent.<br />
Over 10 million South Africans<br />
are unemployed and half the<br />
country live below the poverty<br />
line. Yet, out of the country’s 55<br />
million-strong population, two<br />
Vanguard, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2019—31<br />
million, with 800,000 of them<br />
Nigerians, are foreign born.<br />
When you have a large visible<br />
immigrant community in a<br />
country amid widespread poverty<br />
and inequality among the locals,<br />
xenophobia is not far away.<br />
Poverty and inequality tend to<br />
breed the resentment of<br />
foreigners.<br />
Of course, xenophobia is not a<br />
uniquely South African problem.<br />
It is a world problem! What is<br />
unique about South Africa’s<br />
brand of xenophobia is the violent<br />
element. Sadly, South Africans<br />
have allowed their fear of<br />
immigrants to have a violent<br />
streak. There is absolutely no<br />
excuse for any form of violence.<br />
Which brings us to Nigeria.<br />
The reactions in this country to<br />
the xenophobic attacks in South<br />
Africa have been frenetic, even<br />
hysterical. Of course, Nigeria has<br />
a right to protest the ill treatment<br />
of its citizens in another country.<br />
Yet, what I have read and seen in<br />
the newspapers over the past two<br />
weeks smacks of confected<br />
indignation, an unconvincing<br />
claim to the moral high ground.<br />
There were reprisal attacks on<br />
South African companies in<br />
Nigeria, forcing, as one<br />
newspaper said, MTN to “shut<br />
offices nationwide”. That’s<br />
irrational because responding to<br />
xenophobic violence in South<br />
Africa by attacking its commercial<br />
interests in Nigeria risks<br />
damaging investor confidence<br />
and, thus, Nigeria’s economy.<br />
Sadly, even some prominent<br />
Nigerians were advocating farreaching<br />
economic sanctions.<br />
President Buhari’s party, All<br />
Dealing with the zeitgeist of South Africa’s xenophobia<br />
By PATRICK OBAHIAGBON<br />
THE incidents of xenophobic attacks<br />
in South Africa by South Africans,<br />
with Nigerians very largely as targets,<br />
have been characteristic and assumed<br />
nauseating dimensions. The rising orgy<br />
of killings and arsons has been quite<br />
worrisome. One wonders what offence<br />
Nigeria and Nigerians have committed<br />
to become consistent victims of<br />
xenophobia that has almost assumed a<br />
genocidal dimension.<br />
This is a strange comeuppance, given<br />
the huge investments - especially<br />
pecuniary, totalling over $60 billion - that<br />
Nigeria deployed in South Africa and<br />
Southern Africa to torpedo the apartheid<br />
regime foisted on the former British<br />
colonies by the minority White in cruel<br />
circumvention of the rights of the<br />
majority South African and Southern<br />
African Blacks.<br />
One had expected that South Africa,<br />
in particular, should, indeed, have<br />
always treated Nigeria as a<br />
compassionate big brother in the<br />
ramifications of the successful antiapartheid<br />
struggle. A celebratory attitude<br />
towards all issues that are Nigerian by<br />
the government and people of South<br />
Africa should have been taken for granted<br />
and as a matter of course to which fidelity<br />
should be kept as a directive principle<br />
of state policy.<br />
It is insalubrious and opprobrious that<br />
the good gesture by Nigeria had not<br />
found anchorage in a reciprocal gesture<br />
by South Africa; in which case the<br />
present leadership under President Cyril<br />
Ramaphosa, cannot escape essential<br />
South Africa’s xenophobia and<br />
Nigeria’s moral relativism<br />
indictment for the rising complexities<br />
and waves of debilitating xenophobic<br />
assaults on the significant other Blacks<br />
of foreign origin.<br />
To be sure, whereas post-apartheid<br />
South African presidents, particularly the<br />
late legendary and inimitable Nelson<br />
Mandela and other well-meaning,<br />
perceptive, perspicacious and temperate<br />
leaders of the anti-apartheid struggle,<br />
had worked so hard at continental amity,<br />
it is a harsh and corrosive verdict of<br />
history that the wheel of brotherhood is<br />
being reinvented by South Africa under<br />
President Ramaphosa.<br />
While it may not be correct to assert<br />
that xenophobia was alien to South Africa<br />
before the coming of Ramaphosa, the<br />
sheer magnitude of his body language<br />
had, without a doubt, encouraged an<br />
unprecedented renewed revulsion by<br />
South Africans for other foreign<br />
nationals, especially Blacks of African<br />
descent.<br />
His deputy minister of Police Affairs,<br />
Mr. Bongani Michael Mkongi, had<br />
recently endorsed the spate of<br />
xenophobic attacks wherein he referred<br />
to the activities of foreigners who were<br />
involved in legitimate business as<br />
tantamount to economic sabotage to<br />
South Africa. The ruling African<br />
National Congress, ANC, in South Africa<br />
does not seem to find anything wrong<br />
about these wanton killings, attacks on<br />
foreign nationals and looting of the<br />
businesses of foreign nationals;<br />
otherwise, it should have condemned the<br />
madness in the strongest terms possible.<br />
In the circumstance, it would be<br />
Responding to<br />
xenophobic violence in<br />
South Africa by<br />
attacking its<br />
commercial interests in<br />
Nigeria risks damaging<br />
investor confidence,<br />
Nigeria’s economy<br />
impracticable to expect a South African<br />
government under Ramaphosa’s<br />
presidency to demonstrate a political will<br />
to decisively address the scourge.<br />
Therefore, it is delicate for Nigeria, in<br />
particular, to continue to maintain<br />
diplomatic niceties in the face of real<br />
danger to her policy of citizen diplomacy.<br />
The attitude and body language of<br />
Ramaphosa’s government have not<br />
helped matters at all.<br />
The fact that no single South African<br />
had been arrested, tried and sentenced<br />
to prison for these dastardly acts<br />
reinforces the complicity of Ramaphosa’s<br />
government, which has negative<br />
implications for South Africa’s acclaimed<br />
good faith in the crystalisation of<br />
The South African way is<br />
not the appropriate<br />
trajectory to global<br />
humanism<br />
bilateral, multilateral and diplomatic<br />
relations. This is the reason the blame<br />
for the recent upsurge in xenophobic<br />
attacks should be laid at Ramaphosa’s<br />
feet.<br />
In the absence of expeditious and<br />
clearly effective and reinforcing positive<br />
actions by the South African government<br />
to halt this festering madness, protect<br />
the life and property of Nigerians and<br />
other foreign nationals and preserve<br />
their right to legitimate businesses, I will<br />
be at great pains not to concur with the<br />
call by the National Chair of the All<br />
Progressives Congress, APC, Comrade<br />
Adams Oshiomhole, for the<br />
Send Opinions & Letters to:<br />
opinions1234@yahoo.com<br />
Progressives Congress, called on<br />
the president to “nationalise”<br />
South Africa’s companies in<br />
Nigeria. The party’s national<br />
chairman, Adams Oshiomhole,<br />
asked Nigerians to stop<br />
patronising MTN and other<br />
South African companies in<br />
Nigeria, and called on the<br />
government to revoke the landing<br />
right of the South African Airways,<br />
adding that “it shouldn’t have the<br />
right to fly in any part of Nigeria”.<br />
So, instead of exercising selfrestraint,<br />
as expected of any<br />
responsible party and politician,<br />
Nigeria’s ruling party and its<br />
chairman are whipping up<br />
reckless populist sentiments.<br />
Yet, consider this. According to<br />
Xenowatch, xenophobic attacks<br />
in South Africa have claimed 309<br />
lives and displaced 100,000<br />
people in 24 years, between 1994<br />
and 2018. Few of those are<br />
Nigerians. But, in 2018 alone,<br />
according to Human Right<br />
Watch, Boko Haram killed at least<br />
1,200 people and forced the<br />
displacement of 200,000; while<br />
herdsmen killed at least 1,600<br />
people, causing the displacement<br />
of 300,000!<br />
Ethnic and religious attacks<br />
have claimed more Nigerian<br />
lives than South African<br />
xenophobic attacks. Yet, where is<br />
the moral indignation? Where is<br />
the justice for the victims? How<br />
many people have boycotted<br />
herdsmen’s cows? Is it more<br />
tolerable when Nigerians kill<br />
Nigerians than when South<br />
Africans kill Nigerians? Judging<br />
by the reactions to the xenophobic<br />
attacks, the answer is yes. The<br />
moral relativism is galling!<br />
nationalisation of South African<br />
businesses in Nigeria.<br />
After all, the volume of trade between<br />
Nigeria and South Africa tilts in favour<br />
of South Africa. South African companies<br />
in Nigeria repatriate about $60 billion<br />
to their home country, whereas Nigeria<br />
is less disadvantaged in this regard. It<br />
is rankling that due to their laissez faire<br />
lifestyle of hedonism, epicureanism and<br />
riotous modus-vivendi, envious South<br />
African youths who depend on their<br />
government for social security benefits,<br />
would unleash terror, pains and death<br />
on Nigerians, in particular, and other<br />
foreign nationals, for their industry and<br />
resourcefulness. This is a queer macabre<br />
sense of vengeance against a people<br />
whose only offence is the obvious reward<br />
they derive from a competitive South<br />
African economy for their investments<br />
and hard work.<br />
Xenophobia has afflicted the South<br />
African spirit and inured their<br />
sensibilities. It is a misplaced zeitgeist<br />
that must be condemned by the global<br />
community. The United Nations must<br />
lend its stentorian voice in condemnation<br />
of the dastardly and beastly act. What<br />
we need more than ever before is<br />
continental and global peace. The South<br />
African way is not the appropriate<br />
trajectory to global humanism. South<br />
Africa must be made to respect the rights<br />
and preserve the life and property of<br />
legal migrants; otherwise, it should<br />
resort to becoming an insular nation,<br />
having no dealings with the rest of the<br />
human world.<br />
•Hon. Obahiagbon contributed this<br />
piece from Benin City.