03.10.2019 Views

Maintworld 3/2019

How Digital Twins Can Accelerate Your Digital Transformation // The Art of Reliability (and Performance) Improvement // 10 Basics to Improve Maintenance in Your Organisation

How Digital Twins Can Accelerate Your Digital Transformation // The Art of Reliability (and Performance) Improvement // 10 Basics to Improve Maintenance in Your Organisation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASSET MANAGEMENT<br />

and people are not only encouraged<br />

to participate, but required to do<br />

so. TPM has a similar philosophy;<br />

we are all responsible for asset reliability.<br />

Care should be taken to avoid<br />

making this a maintenance program.<br />

The standard itself is meant to educate<br />

the masses. ISO 55000 lists the primary<br />

targets for the creation and deployment<br />

of the standard itself. Specifically:<br />

• All those engaged in determining<br />

how to improve the returned value<br />

for their company from their asset<br />

base (this means all assets, but we<br />

are focused on physical assets)<br />

• All those who create, execute,<br />

maintain, and improve an asset<br />

management system<br />

• All those who plan, design, implement<br />

and review the activities involved<br />

with asset management<br />

If you read that list again, you could<br />

see how an organization could accidently<br />

make the adoption of ISO 55000 a maintenance<br />

program.<br />

The second element that we should<br />

take heart in for our intervention is to<br />

ensure that those responsible for the<br />

execution of the activities, or as stated<br />

above, the “control activities,” are properly<br />

resourced to be successful. ISO<br />

55002 instructs organizations to develop<br />

these asset management plans for the<br />

purpose of defining the activities that<br />

will be implemented and the resources<br />

that will be used to meet the asset management<br />

objectives. And, those resources<br />

have to be ‘aware and competent.’<br />

FINANCING<br />

GROWTH<br />

ORGANIZATIONAL<br />

PLAN<br />

ORGANIZATIONAL<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

ASSETS<br />

ASSETS<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

POLICY<br />

SAMP<br />

STRUCTURE<br />

VISION<br />

MISSION<br />

There are three thoughts in that last<br />

paragraph that require further definition.<br />

I mentioned ISO 55002. ISO<br />

55000 is actually made up of three companion<br />

standards: 55000, 55001, and<br />

55002. They build on each other like<br />

Russian nesting dolls. I’d recommend an<br />

investment in each. Control activities<br />

are essentially the very foundational activities<br />

that each organization executes<br />

in the care strategy of their assets: PM/<br />

PdM, planning, scheduling, work management,<br />

storeroom control, KPIs and<br />

metrics, etc. The last thought is the idea<br />

of asset management objectives. I want<br />

to expand on this by illustration.<br />

The figure below is meant to show<br />

the entire life cycle of a physical asset<br />

from concept to grave. Give this some<br />

thought.<br />

What exactly is your company’s objective<br />

towards each phase of the asset’s<br />

physical life? It needs to be noted that<br />

the asset’s life does not necessarily end<br />

when your organization is done with it.<br />

No, not at all. The asset could have value<br />

at another location. Understanding this<br />

leads to the crux of asset management.<br />

To what end are we managing assets?<br />

We are managing assets to ensure that<br />

the asset, through the various phases of<br />

its life, can continue to provide ‘value’ to<br />

the organization. This, of course, is predicated<br />

on our ability to determine what<br />

‘value’ means to our organization in<br />

terms of the return on asset utilization.<br />

This last point is where the intervention<br />

takes its initial shape. I feel that organizations<br />

have failed in clearly defining<br />

how utilization, continued reliability,<br />

and availability of the asset contributes<br />

to the value that organizations seek from<br />

their assets. It is the responsibility of top<br />

leadership to translate their organizational<br />

objectives into an asset management<br />

policy. This translation takes place<br />

in the SAMP, or Strategic Asset Management<br />

Plan. The figure below helps to<br />

illustrate this interchange.<br />

You’ve no doubt noticed the ‘Asset’<br />

block between ‘Organizational Objectives”<br />

and the ‘Asset Management Policy.’<br />

This is the genius of ISO 55000 and<br />

a detail we absolutely missed in adopting<br />

TPM. The Asset Management standards<br />

clearly stipulate that it is the responsibility<br />

of the organization to determine<br />

which physical assets, specifically, are<br />

to be included in the asset management<br />

plan. This is a critical point of distinction.<br />

Let this summary remind you of the<br />

path you need to walk going forward to<br />

have a better (asset) life:<br />

• Don’t make asset management a<br />

maintenance program<br />

• Engage all stakeholders<br />

• Resource those responsible for<br />

executing the control activities<br />

• Determine which assets really<br />

matter<br />

• Translate organizational objectives<br />

into an asset management policy<br />

This intervention is meant to shake<br />

you up and help you see the light and, in<br />

a sense, the error of your ways, in terms<br />

of asset management. I do this because<br />

I care. Please reach out if you feel ‘we<br />

need to talk.’<br />

16 maintworld 3/<strong>2019</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!