You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
anything survives.” For though my brother was the most good-humoured
person I ever knew, and could live in good fellowship with absolutely
anybody, not only the merely dirty but the really vulgar, what was really
deepest in him was a steep and even staggering obstinacy.
He kept his word as none but he
Could keep it; and as did not we,
And round him while he kept his word
Today’s diseased and faithless herd,
A moment loud, a moment strong,
But foul for ever, rolled along.
9.—THE CASE AGAINST CORRUPTION
My brother, Cecil Edward Chesterton, was born when I was about five
years old; and, after a brief pause, began to argue. He continued to argue to the
end; for I am sure that he argued energetically with the soldiers among whom
he died, in the last glory of the Great War. It is reported of me that when I was
told that I possessed a brother, my first thought went to my own interminable
taste for reciting verses, and that I said, “That’s all right; now I shall always
have an audience.” If I did say this, I was in error. My brother was by no
means disposed to be merely an audience; and frequently forced the function
of an audience upon me. More frequently still, perhaps, it was a case of there
being simultaneously two orators and no audience. We argued throughout our
boyhood and youth until we became the pest of our whole social circle. We
shouted at each other across the table, on the subject of Parnell or Puritanism
or Charles the First’s head, until our nearest and dearest fled at our approach,
and we had a desert around us. And though it is not a matter of undiluted
pleasure to recall having been so horrible a nuisance, I am rather glad in other
ways that we did so early thrash out our own thoughts on almost all the
subjects in the world. I am glad to think that through all those years we never
stopped arguing; and we never once quarrelled.
Perhaps the principal objection to a quarrel is that it interrupts an
argument. Anyhow, our argument was never interrupted until it began to reach
its conclusion in the proper form; which is conviction. I do not say that at any
particular moment either of us would have admitted being in error; but as a
matter of fact, it was through that incessant process of disagreement that we
came at last to agree. He began as a more mutinous sort of Pagan, a special