19.12.2012 Views

Water and Wastewater Engineering - Sciences Club

Water and Wastewater Engineering - Sciences Club

Water and Wastewater Engineering - Sciences Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECONDARY TREATMENT BY SUSPENDED GROWTH BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES 23-79<br />

Temperature. Very good BPR performance can be achieved as long as SRT values of 16 <strong>and</strong><br />

12 days are provided for temperatures of 5 � C <strong>and</strong> 10 � C, respectively. SRTs between 16 <strong>and</strong><br />

24 days did not affect system performance at 5 � C. At 10 � C, SRTs between 12 <strong>and</strong> 17 days did not<br />

affect system performance (WEF, 2006a).<br />

Recycle streams. Solids processing return flows from sludge thickening, anaerobic digestion,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sludge dewatering typically contain high ammonia <strong>and</strong> phosphorus concentrations. The high<br />

concentrations <strong>and</strong> variable rates of generation will degrade the performance of BPR process if<br />

they are added on an ad hoc basis. At a minimum, the rate of flow should be equalized. Adding<br />

these streams when the strength of the influent wastewater is stronger (typically, during daytime)<br />

will help to increase the removal of recycled phosphorus. Separate treatment with chemical<br />

addition is the preferred alternative (Metcalf & Eddy, 2003; WEF, 2006a).<br />

Chemical addition. To achieve phosphorus concentrations below 1.0 mg/L as well as to provide<br />

backup for the BPR process, chemical addition facilities should be provided.<br />

Design Practice for Denitrification. The following paragraphs outline the design practice for<br />

those portions of the BPR process that affect denitrification <strong>and</strong> its relationship to phosphorus<br />

removal. The discussion is focused on the A 2 /O process. Alternative processes will require<br />

modifications of the design practices noted here. These are discussed in Metcalf & Eddy (2003),<br />

WEF (1998), <strong>and</strong> WEF (2006a).<br />

Hydraulic residence time (HRT). The anoxic tank is typically sized based on the amount of<br />

nitrate to be denitrified. As discussed in the previous paragraphs on SBR design practice, two<br />

design approaches are used to check the anoxic HRT. The method used here is a desktop approach<br />

that uses mass balances for nitrogen <strong>and</strong> the specific denitrification rate (Equation 23-52).<br />

Simulation modeling is the alternative approach.<br />

The desk top method is iterative. The NO x formed in nitrification is estimated. The assumed<br />

anoxic HRT <strong>and</strong> SDNR are used to estimate the amount of NO x that can be denitrified in the fill<br />

time. If it is greater than the NO x formed, the fill time is acceptable. If it is not, another iteration<br />

with a new anoxic fill time is performed.<br />

The major difference between the computational procedure here <strong>and</strong> that used for the SBR is<br />

that internal recycle (Equations 23-54 through 23-57) must be considered.<br />

T ypical HRTs for the A 2 /O process vary between 0.5 <strong>and</strong> 1.5 hours. Typical HRTs for<br />

other processes are given in Table 23-9 .<br />

Internal recycle. Equation 23-54 is used to estimate the internal recycle ratio (IR). To meet a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard of 10 mg/L total nitrogen or less, the design effluent NO 3 -N concentration should be in<br />

the range of 5 to 7 mg/L.<br />

The nitrate concentration in the RAS flow can have a significant adverse effect on the amount<br />

of rbCOD that is available for BPR. The nitrate consumption of rbCOD can be estimated from<br />

the ratio of rbCOD/NO 3 -N used. It is 6.6 g rbCOD/g NO 3 -N (Metcalf & Eddy, 2003).<br />

An internal recycle ratio in the range of 3 to 4 is typical, but ratios in the range of 2 to 3<br />

are also used with lower influent wastewater TKN concentrations. Recycle ratios above 4 are<br />

generally not warranted because the incremental NO 3 -N removal is low <strong>and</strong> more DO is recycled<br />

to the anoxic tank (Metcalf & Eddy, 2003).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!