20.12.2012 Views

Innovation in Services - Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

Innovation in Services - Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

Innovation in Services - Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The somewhat less <strong>in</strong>tensive use of <strong>for</strong>mal methods of protection by services<br />

begs the questions of how well the system is designed to meet their needs. Wölfl<br />

(2005) argues that some of the familiar barriers to <strong>in</strong>novation are more of a<br />

problem <strong>in</strong> service <strong>in</strong>dustries:<br />

‘...external effects may be of particular relevance <strong>for</strong> service firms as<br />

knowledge that is created <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novation process of services firms is<br />

typically not protected by patent law; it may also diffuse more slowly than<br />

knowledge created <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation of goods s<strong>in</strong>ce the IPR regimes used by<br />

services are not based on registration of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation.’ 29<br />

Debate <strong>in</strong> recent years has considered whether firms ought to be able to patent<br />

‘bus<strong>in</strong>ess methods’. A bus<strong>in</strong>ess method may be simply def<strong>in</strong>ed as a method of<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess (e.g. Amazon’s one click shopp<strong>in</strong>g). In Europe, bus<strong>in</strong>ess methods<br />

are not patentable as such, while <strong>in</strong> the USA bus<strong>in</strong>ess models are patentable.<br />

The Gowers Review 30 considered the case <strong>for</strong> patent<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess methods but<br />

expressed concern that they failed to meet the criteria <strong>for</strong> patentability; namely<br />

that <strong>in</strong>ventions are non-obvious <strong>and</strong> novel. The review also raised issues about<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess method patents potentially <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the regulatory burden on SMEs.<br />

Another topic of current debate is the role of the <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights<br />

(IPR) framework <strong>in</strong> encourag<strong>in</strong>g/facilitat<strong>in</strong>g Open <strong>Innovation</strong> systems. Open<br />

<strong>Innovation</strong> systems refer to the fact that <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly firms make use of both<br />

external <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal knowledge <strong>for</strong> the development <strong>and</strong> commercialisation of<br />

their ideas. Open <strong>Innovation</strong> systems are particularly relevant <strong>for</strong> knowledge<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive services (e.g. consultancies). Salter <strong>and</strong> Tether (2006) 31 note that<br />

professional service firms often act as brokers, spann<strong>in</strong>g different structural<br />

roles <strong>in</strong> order to br<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>and</strong> ideas from one place to another. Open<br />

<strong>Innovation</strong> models need a flexible <strong>and</strong> transparent framework <strong>for</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g, as<br />

well as buy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sell<strong>in</strong>g IPRs.<br />

1.4 UK <strong>in</strong>novation policy <strong>and</strong> services<br />

The UK’s approach to <strong>in</strong>novation policy is set out <strong>in</strong> the 2003 <strong>Innovation</strong> Report, 32<br />

which identifies seven success factors <strong>for</strong> the UK’s overall <strong>in</strong>novation<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance:<br />

● Sources of new technological knowledge;<br />

● The capacity to absorb <strong>and</strong> exploit knowledge;<br />

● Access to f<strong>in</strong>ance;<br />

● Competition;<br />

29 Op cit.<br />

30 Gowers (2006) ‘Gowers Review of Intellectual Property’.<br />

31 Op cit.<br />

32 DTI (2003) ‘Compet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Global Economy – The <strong>Innovation</strong> Challenge’, DTI <strong>Innovation</strong> Report.<br />

Introduction<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!