21.12.2012 Views

Evaluation of Malawi's Emergency Human Resources Programme

Evaluation of Malawi's Emergency Human Resources Programme

Evaluation of Malawi's Emergency Human Resources Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management Sciences for Health<br />

Overall Approach<br />

The MSH/MSC team developed a comprehensive evaluation framework to address each<br />

research theme (Annex C) as follows.<br />

For Part I, <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> EHRP Implementation, a set <strong>of</strong> research questions was developed<br />

for each element, and detailed methodologies for collecting both quantitative and<br />

qualitative data were developed. Primary sources were used to calculate costs and gauge<br />

the extent to which each element achieved its purpose. This data was supplemented by<br />

qualitative information in the form <strong>of</strong> focus group discussions and key informant<br />

interviews. Additionally, a <strong>Human</strong> Resource Management (HRM) Study, previously<br />

carried out in Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania in partnership with AMREF, was<br />

replicated in Malawi to determine the extent to which Element 4 (Building HRM Capacity<br />

through technical assistance) achieved its purpose. 25<br />

For Part II; Cost, Sustainability, Impact and Cost Effectiveness; the impact <strong>of</strong> the EHRP<br />

as a whole was assessed using Health Management Information System (HMIS) data to<br />

determine changing levels <strong>of</strong> utilisation <strong>of</strong> health services. The total costs <strong>of</strong> the EHRP<br />

were summarised, and an analysis <strong>of</strong> indirect costs was conducted, such as changing levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> the MOH’s contribution to total health expenditure. The feasibility <strong>of</strong> conducting a<br />

cost-effectiveness analysis was also assessed.<br />

In Part III, Recommendations, the MSH/MSC team conducted an analysis <strong>of</strong> the EHRP<br />

using the <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> for Health Action Framework 26 as a guide. The previous data<br />

and analysis from Parts I and II were incorporated into this analysis. In addition, input<br />

from health and education managers at all levels, and key informant interviews with<br />

decision makers informed the recommendations. Throughout the process, the MSH/MSC<br />

team reviewed the literature and many reports from other commentators and reviewers <strong>of</strong><br />

the EHRP.<br />

Figure 1 on the following page presents a visual framework <strong>of</strong> the research approach.<br />

25 MSH/AMREF: “Competency Gaps in <strong>Human</strong> Resource Management in the Health Sector, An<br />

Exploratory Study <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda”, Final Report, Management Sciences for<br />

Health, July, 2009<br />

26 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Resources</strong> for Health Action Framework, Global Health Workforce Alliance<br />

EHRP <strong>Evaluation</strong> Final Report Page 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!