21.12.2012 Views

Evaluation of Malawi's Emergency Human Resources Programme

Evaluation of Malawi's Emergency Human Resources Programme

Evaluation of Malawi's Emergency Human Resources Programme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Management Sciences for Health<br />

ELEMENT 1: IMPROVING INCENTIVES FOR RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF HEALTH<br />

WORKERS<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> Implementation<br />

The 52% top-ups to the 11 priority cadres <strong>of</strong> staff were implemented nationwide at MOH<br />

and CHAM facilities beginning in April 2005. Although not part <strong>of</strong> the original plan, an<br />

additional cadre, the Health Surveillance Assistants (HSAs), also received top-ups under<br />

the EHRP. HSAs are salaried community-based health workers that deliver various<br />

services, including: immunisations, family planning, well-child visits, and disease<br />

surveillance. MOH targets for HSAs are 1 per 1,000 population (CHAM does not employ<br />

HSAs). The HSAs are recruited and trained within each district by the District Health<br />

Teams. Currently, the HSA cadre is divided into two cohorts: those in established posts, as<br />

determined by the DHRMD, and those in non-established posts, recruited on an indefinite<br />

basis by the Global Fund. The new cohort <strong>of</strong> non-established HSAs was recruited in 2007<br />

and received a 26% salary top-up. In response, established HSAs were also given 26%<br />

top-ups, beginning in October 2008.<br />

The recruitment and re-engagement strategy under Element 1 involved two large-scale<br />

recruitment galas, in June/July 2006 and November/December 2008. The galas were<br />

advertised nation-wide, and held over the course <strong>of</strong> five days in each district. In addition<br />

to recruiting new health workers, a major focus <strong>of</strong> the galas was re-engaging staff that had<br />

left, due to retirement or other reasons. To address these issues, the retirement age was<br />

increased from 55 to 60 years, and three-year contracts were <strong>of</strong>fered to health workers for<br />

re-engagement.<br />

As <strong>of</strong> the writing <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Evaluation</strong> report, the hardship package proposed under Element<br />

1 has not been implemented. No comprehensive plan has been developed detailing the<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the hardship package or how it would be implemented. This topic will be<br />

revisited in later sections <strong>of</strong> the report.<br />

Data and Findings<br />

A. Quantitative<br />

� Yearly targets were set at the inception <strong>of</strong> the EHRP (see Annex A). As <strong>of</strong> the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2009, four cadres have met or surpassed the yearly targets – physicians, clinical<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers, laboratory technicians, and pharmacy technicians. 36 (Figures 3 – 6)<br />

� Physicians increased from 43 in 2004 to 265 in 2009; a 516% increase (Figure 3).<br />

(Refer to Table 5 for complete list <strong>of</strong> percent increases by cadre). 37<br />

36 Full details <strong>of</strong> MOH and CHAM cadres by year compared with targets can be found in Annex I.<br />

37 Note that the large percentage increase in physicians is due to the low starting figure <strong>of</strong> 43 physicians. In<br />

real terms, there was an absolute increase <strong>of</strong> 222 physicians over the EHRP. Nurses, by comparison, saw an<br />

absolute increase <strong>of</strong> 1,356 nurses during the same period, which was a 39% increase.<br />

EHRP <strong>Evaluation</strong> Final Report Page 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!