22.12.2012 Views

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> & <strong>Electric</strong><br />

<strong>Muskogee</strong> <strong>Generating</strong> <strong>Station</strong> – BART Determination<br />

May 28, 2008<br />

typically contain pyrites and other dense inorganic impurities including silica and trace<br />

metals. The solids are typically dewatered in a mechanical dewatering device and disposed<br />

of in a landfill.<br />

The wastewater stream generally consists of an acidic liquid slurry made up of water,<br />

uncombusted coal fines, and impurities in the coal, including calcium, trace metals,<br />

chloride, sulfate, and dissolved and suspended solids. 17 The wastewater slurry must be<br />

treated to remove solids, coal fines, and trace metals prior to discharge. Coal slurry<br />

treatment systems may include surface impoundments, mechanical dewatering systems,<br />

chemical processing systems, and/or thermal dryers.<br />

While washing may be effective in removing rock inclusions from coal, including sulfurbearing<br />

pyrites, a significant amount of coal may also be lost in the washing process. An<br />

inherent consequence of coal washing, in addition to generating wastewater and solid waste<br />

streams, would be the need for the mine to process significantly more coal to make up for<br />

coal lost in the washing process.<br />

<strong>Muskogee</strong> Units 4 & 5 are designed to utilize subbituminous coals. Based on a review of<br />

available information, no information was identified regarding the washability or<br />

effectiveness of washing subbituminous coals. Subbituminous coals have a relatively high<br />

ash content and an excessive amount of fines, and significant dewatering equipment would<br />

be required to process and separate the fines from the wastewater stream. It is likely that<br />

the excess fines production, and the difficulties associated with handling and dewatering<br />

the fines, have restricted the commercial viability of subbituminous coal washing.<br />

Furthermore, the coal washing process would generate significant solid and liquid waste<br />

streams that would require proper management and disposal. Based on a review of<br />

available information, there are currently no commercial subbituminous coal washing<br />

facilities, and washed subbituminous coals are not available through commercial channels.<br />

Therefore, coal washing is not considered an available retrofit control option for <strong>Muskogee</strong><br />

Units 4 & 5.<br />

4.2.1.3 Coal Processing<br />

Pre-combustion coal processing techniques have been proposed as one strategy to reduce<br />

the sulfur content of coal and help reduce uncontrolled SO2 emissions. Coal processing<br />

17 See, USEPA Report to Congress, Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels, Office of Solid Waste and<br />

Emergency Response, EPA 530-S-99-010, March 1999 (general composition of selected large-volume and<br />

low-volume wastes).<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!