22.12.2012 Views

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> & <strong>Electric</strong><br />

<strong>Muskogee</strong> <strong>Generating</strong> <strong>Station</strong> – BART Determination<br />

May 28, 2008<br />

WESP has not been widely used in utility applications, and has only been proposed on<br />

boilers firing high sulfur coals and equipped with SCR. <strong>Muskogee</strong> Units 4 & 5 fire lowsulfur<br />

subbituminous coal. Based on the fuel characteristics listed in Table 4-1, and<br />

assuming 1% SO2 to SO3 conversion in the boiler, potential uncontrolled H2SO4 emissions<br />

from <strong>Muskogee</strong> Units 4 & 5 will only be approximately 5 ppm. This emission rate does<br />

not take into account inherent acid gas removal associated with alkalinity in the<br />

subbituminous coal fly ash. Based on engineering judgment, it is unlikely that a WESP<br />

control system would be needed to mitigate visible sulfuric acid mist emissions from<br />

<strong>Muskogee</strong> Units 4 & 5, even if WFGD control was installed.<br />

WESPs have been proposed to control condensable particulate emissions from boilers<br />

firing a high-sulfur bituminous coal and equipped with SCR and wet FGD. This<br />

combination of coal and control equipment results in relatively high concentrations of<br />

sulfuric acid mist in the flue gas. WESP control systems have not been proposed on units<br />

firing subbituminous coals, and WESP would have no practical application on a<br />

subbituminous-fired units. Therefore, the combination of WFGD+WESP will not be<br />

evaluated further in this BART determination.<br />

Wet FGD Scrubbing - Conclusions<br />

Wet FGD technology is an established SO2 control technology. Wet scrubbing systems<br />

have been designed to utilize various alkaline scrubbing solutions including lime,<br />

limestone, and magnesium-enhanced lime. Wet scrubbing systems may also be designed<br />

with spray tower reactors or reaction vessels (e.g., jet bubbling reactor). Although the flue<br />

gas/reactant contact systems may vary, the chemistry involved in all wet scrubbing systems<br />

is essentially identical. A large majority of the wet FGD systems designed to remove SO2<br />

from existing high-sulfur utility boilers have been designed as wet limestone scrubbers with<br />

spray towers and forced oxidation systems.<br />

Wet scrubbing systems using limestone as the reactant have demonstrated the ability to<br />

achieve control efficiencies of greater than 95% on large pulverized coal-fired boilers firing<br />

high-sulfur bituminous coals. The chemistry of wet scrubbing consists of a complex series<br />

of kinetic and equilibrium-controlled reactions occurring in the gas, liquid and solid phases.<br />

In general, the amount of SO2 removed from the flue gas is governed by the vapor-liquid<br />

equilibrium between SO2 in the flue gas and the absorbent liquid. If no soluble alkaline<br />

species are present in the liquid, the liquid quickly becomes saturated with SO2 and<br />

absorption is limited. 25 Likewise, as the flue gas SO2 concentration goes down, absorption<br />

25 Combustion Fossil Power – A Reference Book on Fuel Burning and Steam Generation, edited by Joseph P.<br />

Singer, Combustion Engineering, Inc., 4 th ed., 1991 (pp. 15-41).<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!