22.12.2012 Views

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Muskogee Generating Station Best ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> & <strong>Electric</strong><br />

<strong>Muskogee</strong> <strong>Generating</strong> <strong>Station</strong> – BART Determination<br />

May 28, 2008<br />

1.3 BART Requirements<br />

A determination of BART must be based on an analysis of the best system of continuous emission<br />

control technology available and associated emission reductions achievable. The BART analysis<br />

must take into consideration: (1) the technology available; (2) the costs of compliance; (3) the<br />

energy and non-air-quality environmental impacts of compliance; (4) any pollution control<br />

equipment in use at the source; (5) the remaining useful life of the source; and (6) the degree of<br />

improvement in visibility which may reasonably be anticipated to result from the use of such<br />

technology.<br />

Guidelines for making BART determinations are included in Appendix Y of 40 CFR Part 51<br />

(Guidelines for BART Determinations Under the Regional Haze Rule). States are required to use<br />

the Appendix Y guidelines to make BART determinations for fossil-fuel-fired generating plants<br />

having a total generating capacity in excess of 750 MW, but are not required to use the guidelines<br />

when making BART determinations for other types of sources. Because the <strong>Muskogee</strong> <strong>Generating</strong><br />

<strong>Station</strong> has a total generating capacity in excess of 750 MW, the Appendix Y guidelines were used<br />

to prepare the BART determination.<br />

The Appendix Y guidelines for BART determinations identify the following five steps in a case-bycase<br />

BART analysis:<br />

Step 1. Identify All Available Retrofit Control Technologies.<br />

Step 2. Eliminate Technically Infeasible Options.<br />

Step 3. Evaluate Control Effectiveness of Remaining Control Technologies.<br />

Step 4. Evaluate Impacts and Document the Results.<br />

Step 5. Evaluate Visibility Impacts.<br />

A more detailed description of each step is provided below.<br />

Step 1. Identify all available retrofit control technologies.<br />

Available retrofit control options are those air pollution control technologies with a practical<br />

potential for application to the emissions unit and the regulated pollutant under evaluation (70<br />

FR 39164 col. 1). Step 1 of the BART determination requires applicants to identify potentially<br />

applicable retrofit control technologies that represent the full range of demonstrated<br />

alternatives. Potentially applicable retrofit control alternatives can include pollution prevention<br />

strategies, the use of add-on controls, or a combination of control strategies. Control<br />

technologies required under the new source review (NSR) program as best available control<br />

technology (BACT) or lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) are available for BART<br />

purposes and must be included as potential control alternatives. However, EPA does not<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!