25.11.2020 Views

Design Yearbook 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Shared Identity: Buildings, Memories, and Meanings

Stephen Grinsell

News stories about either the decision to save or demolish many buildings of

the 1960s and early 1970s regularly use the noun monstrosity, usually prefaced

by the word concrete. However, not all concrete buildings create animosity.

The recently demolished Birmingham Central Library, whilst derided by

Prince Charles as looking like ‘a place where books are incinerated, not kept’

(Birmingham Mail, 2014) is also commonly and affectionately called the

‘Ziggurat’, a reference to the stepped terraces of ancient temples. David Parker

and Paul Long in their article ‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives

of Urban Decline and Regeneration’ write ‘For all their faults, the buildings of

the 1960s and 1970s currently being destroyed supplied Birmingham with an

identity’ (Parker and Long, 2004 p.18). Buildings are given their identity and

meaning, or more accurately, given a multiplicity of meanings, by those who

gaze upon them and allow the building to impact upon them. This impact,

or the experience as a result of that gaze, stirs emotions and evokes memories,

memories that heighten a sense of identity. This identity then becomes a shared

identity as people share their memories, and what the building means to them.

Parker, D., & Long, P. (2004). ‘“The Mistakes of the Past”? Visual Narratives

of Urban Decline and Regeneration’. Visual Culture in Britain, 5(1), 37-58.

The Impacts of Owners’ Participation on ‘Sense of Place’,

the Case of Tehran, Iran

Goran Erfani

A key aspect for urban designers and managers concerns how urban

transformation arising from regeneration of inner-city areas is associated

with ‘sense of place’. Although much academic work tracks individual sense

of place, little interrogates the community aspect and its link with urban

renewal. This study investigated how the urban renewal schemes in Tehran,

Iran have attempted to adopt the owners’ participation into their planning

and implementation. It concentrated especially on diverse ways that different

stakeholders perceived the methods of these schemes and the significance for

community sense of place.

The study examined the urban renewal projects conducted by the municipality

of Tehran which concerns these areas as deprived neighbourhoods with various

physical, social and environmental problems. Two cases were studied, namely

the Oudlajan bazar and the Takhti neighbourhood, which both are located

in the inner city (district 12). Despite similarities, they are distinctive cases.

Oudlajan, which has outstanding heritage value to the city, is a commercial

public space. The Takhti project was about the residential private space. In

addition, each case had diverse socio-cultural and physical transformation.

The selecting of the distinctive cases shaped a better picture of urban

transformation in Tehran.

The techniques applied seek to represent different types of participants, by

means of local observation and semi-structured interviews with a range of

stakeholders in these schemes. Additionally, to elicit what constitutes the

interrelationships between people and place, Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI)

was carried out. The photos captured by the residents were discussed with

them to reveal the potential impact of urban renewal projects on place-based

community attachment, identity and satisfaction in the eyes of individuals.

Concurrently, planners, managers and developers were interviewed. To signify

the intersubjectivity, the results and evidence from the previous phases were

separately discussed with other participant and non-participant residents in

the renewal schemes. Furthermore, the study considered the potential and

limitations for sense of place associated with the urban regeneration schemes.

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!