29.01.2021 Views

Apothecary 2020

Journal of the Worshipful Society of Apothecaries for Master's Year 2019-20

Journal of the Worshipful Society of Apothecaries for Master's Year 2019-20

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

their empirical experiences of successful remedies in<br />

new ways. This certainly seems to have been the case for<br />

Boghurst who stated in his preface: “I have writt<br />

nothing from hearsay or from bookes or from the<br />

testimony of others or my own conceit, but all and onely<br />

from experience and triall.” This does not mean that<br />

Boghurst, and others, wholly abandoned blood-letting,<br />

blistering, purging or Hippocratic ideas of regimen and<br />

diet, and a reliance on humoral theory seems to have<br />

held sway. Thomas Sydenham wrote about how he<br />

evaluated blood letting against inducing a diaphoresis<br />

(intense sweating) or in Sydenham’s words “dissipation<br />

of the Pestilential Ferment by sweat”. He compares the<br />

Electuarium diascordium jar, from the Society's collection<br />

Recipes for electuary of Teucrium scordium (water germander) can be<br />

traced back to the works of Italian physician Girolamo Frascatoro in the 16 th<br />

century. Recommended for treating the plague, its primary active ingredient<br />

was opium. This elaborate delftware jar dates from the late 17 th century.<br />

side-effects of blood letting, which weakens the patient,<br />

against inducing a diaphoresis which he explained may<br />

fail, particularly in young men, who may go on to have<br />

a “Phrensy” or a febrile convulsion in our terms. On<br />

balance, Sydenham considered that inducing a fever<br />

was the better of the two treatments for plague, and<br />

followed a Hippocratic practice of watching and aiding<br />

the patient's body's natural crises.<br />

The ancient remedies of mithridatium and theriac<br />

were also called upon as both preventatives and<br />

treatments, if you could afford their multiple costly<br />

ingredients. Venice Treacle (theriac) was particularly<br />

prized as was its cousin London Treacle which was<br />

recommended in Directions for the Prevention and Cure of<br />

the Plague Fitted for the Poorer Sort (1665) as it consisted of<br />

cheaper ingredients than other medicinal treacles. It<br />

should be mixed with white wine vinegar, juice of<br />

wood-sorrel or juice of “orenges “[sic], plus salt of<br />

wormwood, and “Plague water of Mattias.” The<br />

directions suggested taking it with half a pint of white<br />

wine or a posset drink, and lying in bed quietly to sweat<br />

as long as the patient could bear it. This was continued<br />

at 6 hour intervals, and interspersed with nourishing<br />

meals such as gruel, caudle or chicken broth. The same<br />

pamphlet recommended a wholesome diet, including<br />

meat if you could afford it and salads served with a<br />

mustard, vinegar and oil dressing. It warned against<br />

cabbage, spinach, plums, cucumbers, grapes and<br />

gooseberries and suggested that baked fruit was better<br />

than raw in preventing infection.<br />

Meanwhile physician Nathaniel Hodges (1629-1688),<br />

author of Loimologia (first published in Latin in 1672)<br />

was confident that there were no cures for the plague,<br />

and discounted ancient remedies including<br />

bloodletting, which he described as “fatal.” He also<br />

dismissed the theriac staple of snake lozenges, and was<br />

equally dismissive of bezoars, powder of toads, and<br />

powdered unicorn horn which was recommended to<br />

him as an antidote: “[it] never answered any good<br />

Expectations, although I had several Dozes of it given<br />

me by a Merchant, on purpose, to try its Virtues...[it]<br />

had yet no Efficacy Against the pestilential Virulence.”<br />

It is perennially difficult to establish the motivations<br />

of people in the past. Did the apothecaries remain in<br />

London because of a sense of duty, the commercial<br />

possibilities or a more complex combination of both or<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!