14.04.2021 Views

The Star: April 15, 2021

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• From page 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> city council ultimately<br />

voted to decline the amendment.<br />

Said Dalziel during the meeting:<br />

“Disappointingly, for me, I’ve<br />

been told that I have to accept<br />

this dreadful amendment.”<br />

MacDonald replied: “It’s<br />

healthy for democracy.”<br />

City councillors including<br />

Turner, Mike Davidson, Melanie<br />

Coker, Sara Templeton, Tim<br />

Scandrett, Anne Galloway and<br />

Yani Johanson also voiced opposition<br />

to the amendment at the<br />

meeting.<br />

<strong>The</strong> decision means the city<br />

council’s final submission to<br />

ECan will not include any mention<br />

of rates increases.<br />

Dalziel said at the meeting:<br />

“It is frustrating that we end up<br />

having these debates around<br />

headlines and slogans instead of<br />

debating the real, serious, challenging<br />

issues that we have as a<br />

city in the context of our regional<br />

council’s Long Term Plan.<br />

“Focusing on one aspect of it<br />

[the 24.5 per cent rate increase] –<br />

a headline story – doesn’t cut the<br />

mustard.<br />

“We are required to think for<br />

the current generation, but also<br />

for future generations as well.”<br />

Dalziel told <strong>The</strong> <strong>Star</strong> the<br />

amendment got in the way of<br />

more important discussion about<br />

specific challenges ECan’s LTP<br />

aims to address, including nitrates<br />

in water, ensuring compliance<br />

with air quality and buses.<br />

MacDonald said he feels the<br />

amendment proposal was “shot<br />

down” and was disappointed<br />

with how, he believes, he was accused<br />

of “headline grabbing.”<br />

“In a democracy, there’s nothing<br />

wrong with someone like me<br />

raising valid concerns over proposals<br />

the council are raising. To<br />

be dismissed like that, it should<br />

alarm, I think, a lot of ratepayers,”<br />

he said.<br />

“It does feel like a dictatorship,<br />

where if you don’t comply then<br />

you’ll be publicly embarrassed<br />

like that and that’s not healthy for<br />

democracy.<br />

“What probably frustrates me<br />

Latest Canterbury news at starnews.co.nz<br />

the most, is that when we raise<br />

valid arguments like that around<br />

financial discipline, that the first<br />

response of colleagues is to call<br />

me headline-grabbing.”<br />

Dalziel said MacDonald was not<br />

accused of “headline grabbing.”<br />

She clarified what she meant by<br />

her headline comments with <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Star</strong>, saying sometimes issues that<br />

generate headlines are focused on<br />

more than specific elements that<br />

need attention.<br />

Said Keown: “<strong>The</strong>re’s quite a<br />

strong undertone in our council<br />

at the moment with a level of political<br />

bullying and it’s rearing its<br />

head on quite a regular basis now<br />

and I think the public should be<br />

very, very concerned that that’s<br />

going on.<br />

“You can disagree, that’s fine.<br />

Especially, you can disagree with<br />

a strong debate, but when you<br />

just basically shut down people<br />

and laugh at the ideas that they<br />

put forward on behalf of their<br />

residents, we are seriously staring<br />

at a dictatorship.”<br />

Dalziel completely refuted<br />

MacDonald and Keown’s comments<br />

and told <strong>The</strong> <strong>Star</strong> the<br />

amendment proposal was debated<br />

fairly.<br />

“That is ridiculous. I don’t<br />

have the power to dictate,” said<br />

Dalziel.<br />

“I don’t feel that there was any<br />

bullying.<br />

“I played back the debate. I<br />

intervened twice on Aaron’s<br />

speech. I didn’t shut him down<br />

and I didn’t laugh. On both occasions<br />

I intervened, the clock was<br />

stopped so it did not affect Cr Keown’s<br />

speaking time. His speech<br />

went for the full three minutes<br />

that each councillor is allocated.<br />

“It was debated. I didn’t stop<br />

anyone from debating the issue.”<br />

Turner said: “I’m not aware of<br />

any dictatorship or bullying, all I<br />

see is democracy at play.”<br />

Dalziel said she had not been<br />

informed by MacDonald or<br />

any other city councillors who<br />

supported the amendment that<br />

it was going to be raised at the<br />

meeting, and this was the reason<br />

for her frustration.<br />

Thursday <strong>April</strong> <strong>15</strong> <strong>2021</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Star</strong><br />

NEWS 7<br />

‘I don’t have the power to dictate’<br />

Mosque terrorist<br />

launches fresh<br />

legal challenge<br />

THE MOSQUE shooter has<br />

launched a legal challenge due to<br />

go before a High Court judge this<br />

morning.<br />

<strong>The</strong> gunman is serving a<br />

sentence of life imprisonment<br />

without parole for murdering<br />

51 people and attempting to<br />

murder 40 others at Al Noor<br />

Mosque and Linwood Islamic<br />

Centre on March <strong>15</strong>, 2019.<br />

He was also convicted under<br />

terrorism laws.<br />

He has sought a judicial<br />

review, which is due to be<br />

heard by Justice Geoffrey<br />

Venning in the High Court at<br />

Auckland.<br />

Court records show the hearing<br />

is in chambers, which means<br />

it will not be open to the public.<br />

Media are, however, permitted<br />

to attend. <strong>The</strong> records show the<br />

gunman intends to represent<br />

himself.<br />

A judicial review is where a<br />

judge is asked to review legal<br />

action or a decision. <strong>The</strong> judge<br />

looks at whether the way the<br />

decision was made was in<br />

accordance with the law – but<br />

the judge won’t usually decide<br />

whether the decision was the<br />

“right” decision.<br />

Judicial reviews are always<br />

heard in the High Court and<br />

about 180 judicial reviews are<br />

heard every year. – NZ Herald

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!