Thematic Accuracy Assessment Procedures. Version 2 - USGS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figures Page Figure 1. Work Flow of operational phases of an NPS Vegetation Inventory Project. .............. 13 Figure 2. Relationship between Sample Size (N), Confidence Interval Width, and Confidence Level for two different values of the point estimate of accuracy ( pˆ ). ..................... 26 Figures 3A-D. Examples of Providing Field Maps Suitable as Navigation Aids for Thematic Accuracy Assessment, Thomas Stone National Historical Site (Maryland). ............................... 72 Figures 4A-D. Examples of Providing Field Maps Suitable as Navigation Aids for Thematic Accuracy Assessment, Joshua Tree National Park (California), USGS Conejo Wells 7.5 minute quadrangle......................................................................................................................... 73 Figures 5A-B. Examples of Providing Field Maps Suitable as Navigation Aids for Thematic Accuracy Assessment, Joshua Tree National Park (California), USGS Yucca Valley 7.5 minute quadrangle......................................................................................................................... 74 vii
Page 1 and 2: National Park Service U.S. Departme
Page 3 and 4: Thematic Accuracy Assessment Proced
Page 5 and 6: Contents Contents .................
Page 7: 4.8 Design and Formatting for Conti
Page 11: Tables Table 1. Comparison of field
Page 14 and 15: xii
Page 16 and 17: xiv
Page 18 and 19: xvi
Page 20 and 21: (California), Shenandoah National P
Page 22 and 23: vegetation data collection effort,
Page 24 and 25: 4. Define the most appropriate sour
Page 26 and 27: (BP) For purposes of field efficien
Page 28 and 29: 3. Train field observers (Subsectio
Page 30 and 31: Table 1. Comparison of field observ
Page 33 and 34: 2.0 Sampling Design 2.1 Sampling De
Page 35 and 36: assessment, especially if the MMU s
Page 37 and 38: 2.3.2 Areas with Training Sites Acc
Page 39 and 40: the Literature Cited section). It i
Page 41 and 42: a sampling scheme, the individual s
Page 43 and 44: to the distribution of sporadic or
Page 45 and 46: 1. Sample size can be made proporti
Page 47 and 48: 3.0 Field Methods (Response Design)
Page 49 and 50: descriptions) as important links fr
Page 51 and 52: Method 3 (Method 4 with a post hoc
Page 53 and 54: If field observer skills in species
Page 55 and 56: indicates that the observation area
Page 57 and 58: observation area can occur. This is
Page 59 and 60:
this error is large enough to creat
Page 61 and 62:
4.0 Data Analysis This chapter prov
Page 63 and 64:
population contingency table, which
Page 65 and 66:
Table 9: Population contingency tab
Page 67 and 68:
The standard deviation about that e
Page 69 and 70:
Â+J = p+J A++ 4.6.3 Computation of
Page 71 and 72:
Another common situation involving
Page 73:
eported at the finest level of them
Page 77 and 78:
Literature Cited Brewer, C., B. Sch
Page 79 and 80:
Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenber
Page 81 and 82:
Appendix A. Minimum Mapping Unit (P
Page 83 and 84:
Appendix B. Sampling Design for The
Page 85 and 86:
(2) We created a union of this them
Page 87:
Table 14. Accuracy assessment obser
Page 90 and 91:
THSTAA0 Figure 3A. Acceptable. Obse
Page 92 and 93:
Figure 5A. Incorrect. Showing all m
Page 94 and 95:
abundant than map class A, a perman
Page 97 and 98:
Appendix E. Glossary of Terms, Defi
Page 99 and 100:
Discrete Variable Error Error of Co
Page 101 and 102:
Mapping Unit Minimum Mapping Unit (
Page 103 and 104:
Polygon In a spatial database, a re
Page 105:
Thematic Accuracy Assessment Type S
Page 108 and 109:
Table 16. Population contingency ta
Page 111 and 112:
Exhibit I: Accuracy Assessment Form
Page 113 and 114:
Accuracy Assessment Form Instructio
Page 115 and 116:
The Department of the Interior prot
show all

Thematic Accuracy Assessment Procedures. Version 2 - USGS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?