LMT July 05 - Vol 114 - issue 31
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6 lmtimes.ca • Last Mountain Times • Monday, <strong>July</strong> 5, 2021 • /lastmountaintimes • @lmtimes<br />
RM OF LUMSDEN NO. 189<br />
PUBLIC NOTICE<br />
Public notice is hereby given that the Council of the RM of Lumsden No. 189<br />
intends to adopt a bylaw under The Planning and Development Act, 2007 to<br />
amend Bylaw No. 07-2012, known as the Zoning Bylaw.<br />
INTENT<br />
The proposed bylaw (Bylaw No. 2021-21) provides textual amendments to<br />
Zoning Bylaw 07-2012 to add a definition and regulations for ‘residential<br />
homestay’ and ‘short term accommodation’ within the RM of Lumsden No. 189.<br />
REASON<br />
The intention of the proposed textual amendments is to provide a definition and<br />
regulations for residential homestays and short term accommodations used on<br />
sites such as AirBnB and VRBO within the agriculture and residential zoning<br />
districts.<br />
PUBLIC INSPECTION<br />
Any person may inspect the bylaw at the Lumsden Municipal Office, located<br />
at #300 James Street North, in the Town of Lumsden, between the hours of<br />
8:00 AM and 4:00 PM (open through the noon hour) from Monday to Friday,<br />
excluding statutory holidays. Copies of the proposed bylaw are available at the<br />
Lumsden Municipal Office for a cost of $1.00 and are on the RM of Lumsden<br />
No.189 website; .<br />
PUBLIC HEARING<br />
Council will hold a public hearing on Thursday, <strong>July</strong> 22, 2021 at 2:00 PM via<br />
electronic means (Zoom), to hear any person or group that wants to comment<br />
on the proposed bylaw. Council will also consider written comments received<br />
at the hearing or delivered to the undersigned at the municipal office prior to<br />
the hearing. Please contact the Lumsden Municipal Office for an electronic<br />
invitation to the meeting.<br />
Issued at the Town of Lumsden this 2nd day of <strong>July</strong> 2021.<br />
Jessica Russell, Junior Planner<br />
Town of Strasbourg<br />
NOTICE OF CALL FOR NOMINATIONS<br />
PUBLIC NOTICE is hereby given that nominations of candidates for the office(s)<br />
of:<br />
Councillor: Town of Strasbourg<br />
Number to be Elected: 1<br />
will be received by the undersigned on the 28th day of <strong>July</strong>, 2021, from 8:30<br />
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Town Office - #1-200 Mountain Street, and during regular<br />
business hours from <strong>July</strong> 5th to <strong>July</strong> 28th, 2021, at the Town Office - #1-200<br />
Mountain Street.<br />
Nomination forms may be obtained at the following locations:<br />
Town Office - #1-200 Mountain Street<br />
-orwww.townofstrasbourg.ca<br />
Dated this 5th day of <strong>July</strong>, 2021.<br />
Jennifer Josephson, Returning Officer<br />
Town of Strasbourg<br />
Full-Time Public Works Operator<br />
Working under the Town Foreman, this position involves all<br />
aspects of public works including: landscape maintenance,<br />
snow clearing, installing and repairing services, water and<br />
wastewater treatment, street repairs, equipment<br />
maintenance and much more. For the complete job<br />
description, benefits, and qualification requirements, please<br />
visit www.townofstrasbourg.ca.<br />
To apply, please submit a cover letter and resume outlining<br />
your experience and education to:<br />
Town of Strasbourg<br />
c/o Jenn Josephson, Administrator<br />
#1-200 Mountain Street, Strasbourg<br />
Email: strasbourg@sasktel.net<br />
*Please note: not all who apply will be contacted for<br />
interviews.<br />
Closing date: Monday, <strong>July</strong> 12, 2021 at 12:00 p.m.<br />
Yo ,<br />
Classified ads are free to place<br />
until further notice.<br />
(first 30 words (thats plenty))<br />
Tell us what you’ve got<br />
ADS@<strong>LMT</strong>IMES.CA<br />
RM of McKillop Planning<br />
and Economic Development<br />
Meeting<br />
Service Fees for Rowan’s Ridge, Uhl’s Bay, Flavel and Belmont Beach<br />
& Campgrounds in the Sights of RM Council Committee/Rezoning<br />
Issue/Trailer Permits<br />
The RM of McKillop Planning and Economic<br />
Development Committee met on June 23rd. Present<br />
at the meeting was Committee Chair Marilyn<br />
Labatte, Reeve Bob Schmidt, Councillor Craig<br />
Romanyk, Councillor Garry Dixon, CAO Brandi<br />
Morisette, Development Officer Liana Campbell<br />
and Administrative Assistant Camille Box.<br />
The CAO presented a draft zoning bylaw<br />
amendment to council, which the committee recommended<br />
be moved forward to council. Camille<br />
Box said the amendment was for trailers and<br />
accessory buildings, and there were other items<br />
that had yet to be dealt with, such as Seacans.<br />
Review of OCP and Zoning Bylaw<br />
On the agenda were the review of the Official<br />
Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw for conflicts,<br />
errors and omissions. The committee noted there<br />
were numerous <strong>issue</strong>s in the documents. They<br />
discussed striking a subcommittee to go through<br />
the plan and bylaw to identify the <strong>issue</strong>s. Reeve<br />
Schmidt noted development <strong>issue</strong>s would arise<br />
the longer council did not address the <strong>issue</strong>s.<br />
Chair Labatte brought it to the committee’s<br />
attention that a subcommittee had already been<br />
set. However, she recommended the committee<br />
take the matter up, using the morning of the next<br />
meeting date to address the <strong>issue</strong>s.<br />
The committee decided to meet on <strong>July</strong> 6th at 9<br />
am. CAO Morisette recommended they meet only<br />
as council and staff, and the findings then go to<br />
the public committee meeting.<br />
Review of When Trailer Bylaw Permits are<br />
Required<br />
Reeve Schmidt noted that last year the RM<br />
heard several responses from lot owners that had<br />
been identified as requiring a permit for their<br />
trailers. He said they have had responses such as<br />
- the trailer is taxed - the trailer was being stored<br />
- and the trailer was on a special lot at Uhl’s Bay<br />
where permits are not required.<br />
Schmidt wanted to know how the RM is handling<br />
these responses as he noted he had looked<br />
into the taxation <strong>issue</strong> and said the property<br />
owner was not being taxed on the trailer. He<br />
also questioned the response that a person was<br />
storing their trailer because the bylaw said it was<br />
allowed for short-term off-season storage and<br />
questioned that offseason would be stored for the<br />
winter, to which Councillor Romanyk agreed.<br />
Camille Box said the bylaw officer went out and<br />
documented every lot without a dwelling that had<br />
a trailer on it. Box said they had received more<br />
trailer permits this year than in the previous<br />
year. 24 permits in 2020, and this year the RM<br />
has 34.<br />
Councillor Romanyk asked what the next steps<br />
are as he drives around and looks for the trailer<br />
permits, which he isn’t seeing displayed well or at<br />
all. Romanyk recommended the bylaw officer put<br />
a warning on those trailers.<br />
Box said the Bylaw officer reported 33 trailers,<br />
and the RM has 34 permits taken out, with<br />
only two that are not in compliance. She noted<br />
they do not require permits for trailers on lots<br />
with dwellings and that sometimes trailers are<br />
brought in for a short period which the RM<br />
doesn’t have time to address. She noted there had<br />
been a lot of compliance.<br />
Schmidt noted he had seen 15 trailers at Uhl’s<br />
Bay and 15 at MacPheat Park. Box noted that<br />
Uhl’s Bay has a provision where they can have<br />
some of those trailers. Schmidt noted there are<br />
eight lots at Uhl’s Bay that are not being taxed<br />
and not paying a permit fee, asking, “What are<br />
they paying to contribute their fair share to the<br />
RM?”<br />
Schmidt suggested the eight lots that have a<br />
provision in place be subject to a special services<br />
fee for them as they only pay the tax on the land.<br />
He suggested they were paying only 100$ when<br />
the RM was going after everyone else in the RM.<br />
Romanyk, Dixon and Morisette informed<br />
Schmidt it was $525, not $100.<br />
Morisette said after she came to the RM,<br />
council passed a resolution to leave the eight lots<br />
as they were where the trailers had been granted<br />
approval by the former Administrator to be<br />
there. She said the RM had not done anything to<br />
have those trailers permitted because they were<br />
approved.<br />
Schmidt responded that they could have their<br />
trailer, but they have to pay something to be<br />
there. Morissette responded that they pay $525<br />
in taxes and a $250 garbage fee.<br />
Councillor Dixon noted that one of the lots has<br />
two trailers on it, and one should have a permit.<br />
Box said that they have a letter from the RM that<br />
allows them to do that and that one has a permit<br />
which the RM has required. Dixon said the council<br />
could discuss that on <strong>July</strong> 6th and that they<br />
need to look at the <strong>issue</strong> around zoning on <strong>July</strong><br />
6th, in particular Uhl’s Bay.<br />
Reeve Schmidt disagreed with the allowance of<br />
not requiring the eight lots in Uhl’s Bay not to pay<br />
the permit fee.<br />
Development Officer Liana Campbell posed a<br />
question to the committee asking that despite<br />
the previous agreements, didn’t the new council<br />
have the authority to make changes. Which the<br />
committee responded they did. Schmidt said that<br />
he felt it should be fair and equitable across the<br />
RM. CAO Morisette agreed that the eight lots<br />
should be subject to taking out a trailer permit,<br />
but she said in the RM’s trailer bylaw, it notes<br />
“temporary”, not permanent. And that these<br />
trailers were allowed to be there permanently,<br />
not temporarily.<br />
Schmidt said he agreed with Morisette and<br />
suggested council explore other options as they<br />
haven’t decided what to do with Belmont, Flavel<br />
Beach, and all of the individual lots at campgrounds.<br />
Which he said they should all be paying<br />
as services are being paid by the RM. Labatte<br />
said they would discuss this at the <strong>July</strong> 6th meeting.<br />
Flavel and Belmont Beach Not on the<br />
Agenda<br />
CAO Morissette apologized that she had missed<br />
adding the discussion for the assessments for<br />
5 Flavel properties and 23 at Belmont Beach to<br />
the agenda and asked council to make a resolution<br />
from the committee to add it to the agenda,<br />
which they did.<br />
The CAO said they received an email from<br />
SAMA about how the RM would assess Flavel<br />
and Belmont Beach leasehold properties. She<br />
said the other option would be to apply a service<br />
fee through a bylaw on the properties.<br />
The CAO recommended they discuss fair taxation<br />
of all properties because leaseholds are only<br />
being taxed on improvements. She said the email<br />
talked about assessing part of a parcel. She said it<br />
would mean an assessment would delay the RM’s<br />
assessment roll a further 60 days from the date<br />
the assessments were mailed.<br />
She said the current assessment closes <strong>July</strong><br />
17th, and notices need to be out by August <strong>31</strong>st.<br />
The delay would push them to mid-September<br />
which she didn’t want to do. She recommended<br />
that council pass a special service fee this year<br />
and then review it for next year. Schmidt said the<br />
services cover road maintenance, dust control,<br />
cutting of grass and fire service.<br />
Schmidt said they needed a strategy for future<br />
service fees for the campgrounds as well. Romanyk<br />
asked how the RM could apply $525<br />
through the bylaws directly to the development.