07.07.2021 Views

LMT July 05 - Vol 114 - issue 31

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 lmtimes.ca • Last Mountain Times • Monday, <strong>July</strong> 5, 2021 • /lastmountaintimes • @lmtimes<br />

RM OF LUMSDEN NO. 189<br />

PUBLIC NOTICE<br />

Public notice is hereby given that the Council of the RM of Lumsden No. 189<br />

intends to adopt a bylaw under The Planning and Development Act, 2007 to<br />

amend Bylaw No. 07-2012, known as the Zoning Bylaw.<br />

INTENT<br />

The proposed bylaw (Bylaw No. 2021-21) provides textual amendments to<br />

Zoning Bylaw 07-2012 to add a definition and regulations for ‘residential<br />

homestay’ and ‘short term accommodation’ within the RM of Lumsden No. 189.<br />

REASON<br />

The intention of the proposed textual amendments is to provide a definition and<br />

regulations for residential homestays and short term accommodations used on<br />

sites such as AirBnB and VRBO within the agriculture and residential zoning<br />

districts.<br />

PUBLIC INSPECTION<br />

Any person may inspect the bylaw at the Lumsden Municipal Office, located<br />

at #300 James Street North, in the Town of Lumsden, between the hours of<br />

8:00 AM and 4:00 PM (open through the noon hour) from Monday to Friday,<br />

excluding statutory holidays. Copies of the proposed bylaw are available at the<br />

Lumsden Municipal Office for a cost of $1.00 and are on the RM of Lumsden<br />

No.189 website; .<br />

PUBLIC HEARING<br />

Council will hold a public hearing on Thursday, <strong>July</strong> 22, 2021 at 2:00 PM via<br />

electronic means (Zoom), to hear any person or group that wants to comment<br />

on the proposed bylaw. Council will also consider written comments received<br />

at the hearing or delivered to the undersigned at the municipal office prior to<br />

the hearing. Please contact the Lumsden Municipal Office for an electronic<br />

invitation to the meeting.<br />

Issued at the Town of Lumsden this 2nd day of <strong>July</strong> 2021.<br />

Jessica Russell, Junior Planner<br />

Town of Strasbourg<br />

NOTICE OF CALL FOR NOMINATIONS<br />

PUBLIC NOTICE is hereby given that nominations of candidates for the office(s)<br />

of:<br />

Councillor: Town of Strasbourg<br />

Number to be Elected: 1<br />

will be received by the undersigned on the 28th day of <strong>July</strong>, 2021, from 8:30<br />

a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Town Office - #1-200 Mountain Street, and during regular<br />

business hours from <strong>July</strong> 5th to <strong>July</strong> 28th, 2021, at the Town Office - #1-200<br />

Mountain Street.<br />

Nomination forms may be obtained at the following locations:<br />

Town Office - #1-200 Mountain Street<br />

-orwww.townofstrasbourg.ca<br />

Dated this 5th day of <strong>July</strong>, 2021.<br />

Jennifer Josephson, Returning Officer<br />

Town of Strasbourg<br />

Full-Time Public Works Operator<br />

Working under the Town Foreman, this position involves all<br />

aspects of public works including: landscape maintenance,<br />

snow clearing, installing and repairing services, water and<br />

wastewater treatment, street repairs, equipment<br />

maintenance and much more. For the complete job<br />

description, benefits, and qualification requirements, please<br />

visit www.townofstrasbourg.ca.<br />

To apply, please submit a cover letter and resume outlining<br />

your experience and education to:<br />

Town of Strasbourg<br />

c/o Jenn Josephson, Administrator<br />

#1-200 Mountain Street, Strasbourg<br />

Email: strasbourg@sasktel.net<br />

*Please note: not all who apply will be contacted for<br />

interviews.<br />

Closing date: Monday, <strong>July</strong> 12, 2021 at 12:00 p.m.<br />

Yo ,<br />

Classified ads are free to place<br />

until further notice.<br />

(first 30 words (thats plenty))<br />

Tell us what you’ve got<br />

ADS@<strong>LMT</strong>IMES.CA<br />

RM of McKillop Planning<br />

and Economic Development<br />

Meeting<br />

Service Fees for Rowan’s Ridge, Uhl’s Bay, Flavel and Belmont Beach<br />

& Campgrounds in the Sights of RM Council Committee/Rezoning<br />

Issue/Trailer Permits<br />

The RM of McKillop Planning and Economic<br />

Development Committee met on June 23rd. Present<br />

at the meeting was Committee Chair Marilyn<br />

Labatte, Reeve Bob Schmidt, Councillor Craig<br />

Romanyk, Councillor Garry Dixon, CAO Brandi<br />

Morisette, Development Officer Liana Campbell<br />

and Administrative Assistant Camille Box.<br />

The CAO presented a draft zoning bylaw<br />

amendment to council, which the committee recommended<br />

be moved forward to council. Camille<br />

Box said the amendment was for trailers and<br />

accessory buildings, and there were other items<br />

that had yet to be dealt with, such as Seacans.<br />

Review of OCP and Zoning Bylaw<br />

On the agenda were the review of the Official<br />

Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw for conflicts,<br />

errors and omissions. The committee noted there<br />

were numerous <strong>issue</strong>s in the documents. They<br />

discussed striking a subcommittee to go through<br />

the plan and bylaw to identify the <strong>issue</strong>s. Reeve<br />

Schmidt noted development <strong>issue</strong>s would arise<br />

the longer council did not address the <strong>issue</strong>s.<br />

Chair Labatte brought it to the committee’s<br />

attention that a subcommittee had already been<br />

set. However, she recommended the committee<br />

take the matter up, using the morning of the next<br />

meeting date to address the <strong>issue</strong>s.<br />

The committee decided to meet on <strong>July</strong> 6th at 9<br />

am. CAO Morisette recommended they meet only<br />

as council and staff, and the findings then go to<br />

the public committee meeting.<br />

Review of When Trailer Bylaw Permits are<br />

Required<br />

Reeve Schmidt noted that last year the RM<br />

heard several responses from lot owners that had<br />

been identified as requiring a permit for their<br />

trailers. He said they have had responses such as<br />

- the trailer is taxed - the trailer was being stored<br />

- and the trailer was on a special lot at Uhl’s Bay<br />

where permits are not required.<br />

Schmidt wanted to know how the RM is handling<br />

these responses as he noted he had looked<br />

into the taxation <strong>issue</strong> and said the property<br />

owner was not being taxed on the trailer. He<br />

also questioned the response that a person was<br />

storing their trailer because the bylaw said it was<br />

allowed for short-term off-season storage and<br />

questioned that offseason would be stored for the<br />

winter, to which Councillor Romanyk agreed.<br />

Camille Box said the bylaw officer went out and<br />

documented every lot without a dwelling that had<br />

a trailer on it. Box said they had received more<br />

trailer permits this year than in the previous<br />

year. 24 permits in 2020, and this year the RM<br />

has 34.<br />

Councillor Romanyk asked what the next steps<br />

are as he drives around and looks for the trailer<br />

permits, which he isn’t seeing displayed well or at<br />

all. Romanyk recommended the bylaw officer put<br />

a warning on those trailers.<br />

Box said the Bylaw officer reported 33 trailers,<br />

and the RM has 34 permits taken out, with<br />

only two that are not in compliance. She noted<br />

they do not require permits for trailers on lots<br />

with dwellings and that sometimes trailers are<br />

brought in for a short period which the RM<br />

doesn’t have time to address. She noted there had<br />

been a lot of compliance.<br />

Schmidt noted he had seen 15 trailers at Uhl’s<br />

Bay and 15 at MacPheat Park. Box noted that<br />

Uhl’s Bay has a provision where they can have<br />

some of those trailers. Schmidt noted there are<br />

eight lots at Uhl’s Bay that are not being taxed<br />

and not paying a permit fee, asking, “What are<br />

they paying to contribute their fair share to the<br />

RM?”<br />

Schmidt suggested the eight lots that have a<br />

provision in place be subject to a special services<br />

fee for them as they only pay the tax on the land.<br />

He suggested they were paying only 100$ when<br />

the RM was going after everyone else in the RM.<br />

Romanyk, Dixon and Morisette informed<br />

Schmidt it was $525, not $100.<br />

Morisette said after she came to the RM,<br />

council passed a resolution to leave the eight lots<br />

as they were where the trailers had been granted<br />

approval by the former Administrator to be<br />

there. She said the RM had not done anything to<br />

have those trailers permitted because they were<br />

approved.<br />

Schmidt responded that they could have their<br />

trailer, but they have to pay something to be<br />

there. Morissette responded that they pay $525<br />

in taxes and a $250 garbage fee.<br />

Councillor Dixon noted that one of the lots has<br />

two trailers on it, and one should have a permit.<br />

Box said that they have a letter from the RM that<br />

allows them to do that and that one has a permit<br />

which the RM has required. Dixon said the council<br />

could discuss that on <strong>July</strong> 6th and that they<br />

need to look at the <strong>issue</strong> around zoning on <strong>July</strong><br />

6th, in particular Uhl’s Bay.<br />

Reeve Schmidt disagreed with the allowance of<br />

not requiring the eight lots in Uhl’s Bay not to pay<br />

the permit fee.<br />

Development Officer Liana Campbell posed a<br />

question to the committee asking that despite<br />

the previous agreements, didn’t the new council<br />

have the authority to make changes. Which the<br />

committee responded they did. Schmidt said that<br />

he felt it should be fair and equitable across the<br />

RM. CAO Morisette agreed that the eight lots<br />

should be subject to taking out a trailer permit,<br />

but she said in the RM’s trailer bylaw, it notes<br />

“temporary”, not permanent. And that these<br />

trailers were allowed to be there permanently,<br />

not temporarily.<br />

Schmidt said he agreed with Morisette and<br />

suggested council explore other options as they<br />

haven’t decided what to do with Belmont, Flavel<br />

Beach, and all of the individual lots at campgrounds.<br />

Which he said they should all be paying<br />

as services are being paid by the RM. Labatte<br />

said they would discuss this at the <strong>July</strong> 6th meeting.<br />

Flavel and Belmont Beach Not on the<br />

Agenda<br />

CAO Morissette apologized that she had missed<br />

adding the discussion for the assessments for<br />

5 Flavel properties and 23 at Belmont Beach to<br />

the agenda and asked council to make a resolution<br />

from the committee to add it to the agenda,<br />

which they did.<br />

The CAO said they received an email from<br />

SAMA about how the RM would assess Flavel<br />

and Belmont Beach leasehold properties. She<br />

said the other option would be to apply a service<br />

fee through a bylaw on the properties.<br />

The CAO recommended they discuss fair taxation<br />

of all properties because leaseholds are only<br />

being taxed on improvements. She said the email<br />

talked about assessing part of a parcel. She said it<br />

would mean an assessment would delay the RM’s<br />

assessment roll a further 60 days from the date<br />

the assessments were mailed.<br />

She said the current assessment closes <strong>July</strong><br />

17th, and notices need to be out by August <strong>31</strong>st.<br />

The delay would push them to mid-September<br />

which she didn’t want to do. She recommended<br />

that council pass a special service fee this year<br />

and then review it for next year. Schmidt said the<br />

services cover road maintenance, dust control,<br />

cutting of grass and fire service.<br />

Schmidt said they needed a strategy for future<br />

service fees for the campgrounds as well. Romanyk<br />

asked how the RM could apply $525<br />

through the bylaws directly to the development.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!