Newslink August
Motor Schools Association of Great Britain; driving instructors, road safety, motoring news
Motor Schools Association of Great Britain; driving instructors, road safety, motoring news
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
News - B + E Trainer row<br />
B+E trainers up in arms as<br />
criticism mounts over plans<br />
MSA GB has stepped in to support<br />
instructors who conduct B + E training<br />
after the DVSA/DfT announced that such<br />
tests would be reduced considerably in<br />
the short term to allow for more LGV<br />
tests, and potentially could be scrapped<br />
in the long term.<br />
One member said the plans<br />
demonstrated the DfT/DVSA’s blatant<br />
disregard for people’s livelihoods, while<br />
others criticised a policy that could have<br />
a major impact on lowering driving<br />
standards. Chris Allen from Go Towing<br />
told MSA GB that “the idea of a 17-yearold<br />
passing their test and hooking up a<br />
two-tonne caravan before driving down<br />
the M1 on their first motorway drive is<br />
utter madness.”<br />
The policy has been suggested as a<br />
solution to the current severe shortage of<br />
LGV drivers in the UK, which is having a<br />
disastrous knock-on effect on a host of<br />
business supply chains, including for<br />
food, medicines and fuel.<br />
The driver shortage is being blamed on<br />
a sharp fall in the number of EU<br />
nationals working in the UK haulage<br />
sector since Brexit. Since the end of last<br />
year, when the UK formally left EU rules<br />
on road haulage, LGVs cannot utilise<br />
fully the cabotage scheme. This has<br />
removed many European trucks from UK<br />
roads which previously had completed<br />
extra pick-ups and deliveries in addition<br />
to their original load. Evidence also<br />
points to many EU nationals who drove<br />
in the UK but have now returned home,<br />
citing concerns over Brexit and Covid-19.<br />
Whatever the reasons, many businesses<br />
within the retail, construction and<br />
logistics sectors face acute difficulties in<br />
What the trainers say...<br />
obtaining the drivers they need for their<br />
operations, with some retailers predicting<br />
the scarcity of drivers will lead to<br />
shortages in the shops, particularly food.<br />
To help ease the shortage, the DfT<br />
plans to increase LGV testing to get more<br />
UK drivers behind the wheel – but at a<br />
price. The number of B+E trailer tests<br />
will be reduced so examiners can be<br />
The driving licence regulations state<br />
that if you passed your car driving<br />
test on or after 1 January 1997 you<br />
can:<br />
• drive a car or van up to 3,500kg<br />
maximum authorised mass (MAM)<br />
towing a trailer of up to 750kg MAM<br />
• tow a trailer over 750kg MAM as<br />
long as the combined MAM of the<br />
trailer and towing vehicle is no more<br />
than 3,500kg<br />
re-allocated to LGVs, and this plan is<br />
causing huge concern for those ADIs<br />
whose principal business is this testing.<br />
More worrying, ADIs have been asked<br />
for their views on ending the need to take<br />
a B+E test in the future, allowing car<br />
licence holders to tow a caravan or trailer<br />
without further training or taking a test.<br />
MSA GB national chairman Peter<br />
Harvey said the decision to reduce B+ E<br />
testing slots had caught many by<br />
surprise. “When the news broke we were<br />
inundated with complaints from members<br />
who conduct B+E training. Coming on<br />
the back of the pandemic, when many<br />
ADIs have had little or no work, it has<br />
come as a body-blow.”<br />
Peter cited concerns over safety<br />
standards and whether licence holders<br />
were capable of handling the extra<br />
challenges posed by towing a trailer or<br />
caravan as reasons to question the<br />
wisdom of both decisions, while noting<br />
the disastrous impact scrapping B+E<br />
trailer tests long-term would have on<br />
those ADIs who focused on them.<br />
He said: “It really feels as if the DfT is<br />
planning to rip the rug from under the feet<br />
of a number of dedicated road safety<br />
professionals without real reason to do so.<br />
“We do not agree with reducing B+E<br />
testing, but at least a case can be made<br />
to justify it in the very short-term. Axeing<br />
them all together seems nonsensical.<br />
“If, as appears, the Government and<br />
the logistics sector have been caught out<br />
by Brexit reducing the number of drivers<br />
available, this is an issue that should<br />
have been sorted out years ago – indeed,<br />
it should have been considered before<br />
the referendum in 2016. To only<br />
acknowledge the problem now, five years<br />
later, and to try to solve the issue by<br />
introducing policies that will destroy the<br />
livelihoods of driver trainers, is a dreadful<br />
example of knee-jerk decision-making<br />
and begs the question, is anyone in<br />
Westminster taking note of the<br />
Karl Hunt, B+E trainer,<br />
in an open letter to MPs<br />
“I appreciate that there is a need to<br />
increase the testing capacity for LGVs<br />
but I find it incredulous that the<br />
Government is considering removing the<br />
need for an additional test for B+E<br />
entitlement.... this will not do anything<br />
to maintain or improve driving standards<br />
and reduce KSI figures. If anything it will<br />
increase the number of incidents involving<br />
vehicles towing trailers up to 3500kg.<br />
“The national pass rate for B+E driving<br />
tests was 69.6% for 2019/20 and only<br />
58% for 2020/21 – therefore 30-42% of<br />
people taking this test are unable to<br />
demonstrate the minimum standard of<br />
driving and competence to do so.<br />
“A Government report – Trailer Safety<br />
Report – identified 983 collisions<br />
involving vehicles towing single, multiple<br />
trailers and caravan (B+E category) of<br />
which 358 were assigned to peoplerelated<br />
contributory factors, ie, the driver;<br />
this is five times higher than contributory<br />
factors assigned to either vehicle or road<br />
individually as contributory factors!<br />
“This would indicate that there is a<br />
need for formal testing of drivers with a<br />
requirement to tow on the road, and that<br />
the removal of such testing would do<br />
nothing to help with improving driving<br />
standards and safety on UK roads.”<br />
10<br />
NEWSLINK n AUGUST 2021