01.09.2021 Views

Newslink September 2021

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain membership magazine; driving instructors, road safety, motoring news

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain membership magazine; driving instructors, road safety, motoring news

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

News<br />

MSA GB RESPONSE<br />

L-test data capture<br />

can only be fine if<br />

rules are changed to<br />

make it compulsory<br />

Peter Harvey MBE<br />

National Chairman<br />

MSA GB<br />

As soon as I first heard about the DVSA’s<br />

latest plans to link post L-test data to<br />

ADI’s standards checks, I thought ‘Here<br />

we go again.’<br />

Some of you will remember that in<br />

2015, the DVSA suggested a traffic light<br />

system to seek out the poorer ADIs who<br />

continually presented below-standard<br />

pupils. At the time NASP ran a survey<br />

with members on the issue. Question 3<br />

of that survey read: ‘Would you consider<br />

it acceptable that DVSA uses data<br />

derived from driving test performance<br />

(ie, pass and failure rates) as part of the<br />

overall performance and quality<br />

assessment of an ADI?’<br />

70% of those who responded said<br />

‘No.’<br />

As you will imagine, since we heard<br />

about the more recent plans to use test<br />

data via the ADI Enforcement Analysis<br />

Report, I have been inundated with<br />

comments from members. To be fair, the<br />

response has been about a 50/50 split<br />

for and against. However, a number have<br />

expressed concerns about how the<br />

figures have been arrived at, eg, if pupils<br />

are allowed 15 driver errors, how did<br />

DVSA come to the decision that five<br />

would be a trigger to review an ADI’s<br />

performance. How did DVSA come up<br />

with the figure that 0.5% per cent<br />

serious faults would be a trigger? A<br />

candidate can’t have only half a serious<br />

fault. ADIs now need to be achieving a<br />

55 per cent pass rate at test centres, yet<br />

the national average pass rate is lower<br />

than this figure and at some centres,<br />

very much lower. In addition, members<br />

have pointed out that there are a host of<br />

reasons that can account for that, and<br />

ADIs are not the only contributing factor<br />

in test pass rates.<br />

The other most common question I<br />

receive is, can I take my badge/certificate<br />

The proposed L-test<br />

data report that each<br />

ADI will receive. MSA<br />

GB has some issues<br />

with the levels set by<br />

DVSA to trigger<br />

enforcement checks<br />

out of the window before a test? Yes, you<br />

can; there is no regulation that forces<br />

you to leave your certification in the<br />

window. In fact if, in these extremely<br />

busy times, you had another test just<br />

after the one that is out with an<br />

examiner, you would need to have your<br />

certificate with you in the other vehicle.<br />

The other concern around certificates<br />

is, can DVSA identify me by my car<br />

registration? The examiners’ guidance for<br />

driving tests – the DT1 – currently states:<br />

‘If an ADI certificate is displayed in the<br />

windscreen or the ADI identifies<br />

themselves to the examiner and<br />

indicates that they wish the candidate<br />

to be linked to their name, then the ADI<br />

number and serial number from the ADI<br />

certificate should both be entered on<br />

the DL 25. Note: Data Protection Act: If<br />

the ADI certificate is not displayed then<br />

the ADI number must not be entered on<br />

the DL25 and neither the candidate nor<br />

‘‘<br />

Despite a few queries most<br />

instructors would be inclined<br />

to accept some of the changes<br />

but we need a level playing<br />

field in which all have to<br />

display their certificate...<br />

‘‘<br />

accompanying driver should be<br />

questioned about the identity of the<br />

instructor.’<br />

That suggests a change in the<br />

guidance is required first. I feel DVSA<br />

needs to explain its data decisions<br />

regarding the triggers suggested and<br />

consider increasing them to more<br />

realistic values.<br />

Overall, however, despite a few queries<br />

and grumbles, most instructors I have<br />

spoken to, would be more inclined to<br />

accept some of the changes but we need<br />

a level playing field, in which all have to,<br />

by law, display their certificate/licence<br />

when their pupil was on test.<br />

For this to happen, however, the ADI<br />

regulations would first need to be altered,<br />

to allow the Registrar to issue duplicate<br />

certificates, to get around the potential<br />

problem of an ADI having more than one<br />

pupil out on tests at the same time or to<br />

carry out other paid work.<br />

A NASP meeting has been arranged to<br />

discuss these and various other matters<br />

around data protection as there are a<br />

whole host of things that don’t make<br />

sense to instructors. At present we are<br />

not even allowed to sit in the back of the<br />

car during a test, and in most cases, we<br />

don’t receive a copy of the test report<br />

when a pupil passes, so we have no way<br />

of telling how many driver errors are<br />

recorded.<br />

Click here for full details of<br />

DVSA’s L-test data capture<br />

12<br />

NEWSLINK n SEPTEMBER <strong>2021</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!