24.12.2012 Views

Annex A - Official Documents

Annex A - Official Documents

Annex A - Official Documents

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The treaty bodies.<br />

COUNCIL OF EUROPE:<br />

The Ministerial Committee of the Council of Europe;<br />

Parliamentary Assembly;<br />

European Court for Human Rights;<br />

The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights;<br />

European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI);<br />

European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT).<br />

EUROPEAN UNION:<br />

The European Council;<br />

Statements by CFSP bodies;<br />

Country-specific common positions and declarations of the EU;<br />

EU Annual human rights report;<br />

EU HOMs human rights reports and EU human rights fact sheets;<br />

Resolutions and declarations by the European Parliament .<br />

Section 2: Best practices for the interpretation of Criterion 7<br />

How to apply Criterion 7<br />

3.2.1 The EU Code of Conduct applies to all arms exports by Member States. Thus a prior Criterion 7<br />

applies to exports to all recipient countries without any distinction. However, these practices follow the<br />

principle that cases where there is a higher potential risk should be subject to a greater degree of scrutiny<br />

than cases with less risk. Evaluation of individual export license applications should be done on a caseby-case<br />

basis and include an over-all risk analysis, based on the potential risk level in the recipient state,<br />

the reliability of those involved in the transactions, the nature of the goods to be transferred and the<br />

intended end-use. Member States are encouraged to exchange information regarding countries of<br />

concern on a case-by-case basis through the co-operation in COARM, or by other channels. In addition,<br />

improved documentation in diversion risk-assessment at the licensing stage would make diversion more<br />

difficult. Effective systems of end-user control contribute to the prevention of undesirable diversion or reexport<br />

of military equipment and military technology. End-user certificates and their authentication at the<br />

licensing stage should play a central role in counter-diversion policies. (see also Chapter 2).<br />

Nevertheless, using end-user certificates cannot substitute for a complete risk assessment of the<br />

situation in the particular case.<br />

3.2.2 Information sources. Information on diversionary risks should be sought from a wide variety of<br />

sources. A common EU base of information sources available to all Member States consists of EU<br />

HOMs reports, Open-source defence publications and Export Control regimes information exchanges<br />

and websites as well as reports from relevant Security Council Committees, in particular Security<br />

Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1540 (2004); additional information might be<br />

obtained as appropriate from Member States diplomatic missions and other governmental institutions<br />

such as customs, police and other law enforcement services as well as those providing Intelligence<br />

information or through exchange of views among Member States regarding export to the country in<br />

question. A non-exhaustive list of relevant internet websites is contained in <strong>Annex</strong> I.<br />

<strong>Annex</strong> F<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!