Annex A - Official Documents
Annex A - Official Documents
Annex A - Official Documents
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The treaty bodies.<br />
COUNCIL OF EUROPE:<br />
The Ministerial Committee of the Council of Europe;<br />
Parliamentary Assembly;<br />
European Court for Human Rights;<br />
The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights;<br />
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI);<br />
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT).<br />
EUROPEAN UNION:<br />
The European Council;<br />
Statements by CFSP bodies;<br />
Country-specific common positions and declarations of the EU;<br />
EU Annual human rights report;<br />
EU HOMs human rights reports and EU human rights fact sheets;<br />
Resolutions and declarations by the European Parliament .<br />
Section 2: Best practices for the interpretation of Criterion 7<br />
How to apply Criterion 7<br />
3.2.1 The EU Code of Conduct applies to all arms exports by Member States. Thus a prior Criterion 7<br />
applies to exports to all recipient countries without any distinction. However, these practices follow the<br />
principle that cases where there is a higher potential risk should be subject to a greater degree of scrutiny<br />
than cases with less risk. Evaluation of individual export license applications should be done on a caseby-case<br />
basis and include an over-all risk analysis, based on the potential risk level in the recipient state,<br />
the reliability of those involved in the transactions, the nature of the goods to be transferred and the<br />
intended end-use. Member States are encouraged to exchange information regarding countries of<br />
concern on a case-by-case basis through the co-operation in COARM, or by other channels. In addition,<br />
improved documentation in diversion risk-assessment at the licensing stage would make diversion more<br />
difficult. Effective systems of end-user control contribute to the prevention of undesirable diversion or reexport<br />
of military equipment and military technology. End-user certificates and their authentication at the<br />
licensing stage should play a central role in counter-diversion policies. (see also Chapter 2).<br />
Nevertheless, using end-user certificates cannot substitute for a complete risk assessment of the<br />
situation in the particular case.<br />
3.2.2 Information sources. Information on diversionary risks should be sought from a wide variety of<br />
sources. A common EU base of information sources available to all Member States consists of EU<br />
HOMs reports, Open-source defence publications and Export Control regimes information exchanges<br />
and websites as well as reports from relevant Security Council Committees, in particular Security<br />
Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1540 (2004); additional information might be<br />
obtained as appropriate from Member States diplomatic missions and other governmental institutions<br />
such as customs, police and other law enforcement services as well as those providing Intelligence<br />
information or through exchange of views among Member States regarding export to the country in<br />
question. A non-exhaustive list of relevant internet websites is contained in <strong>Annex</strong> I.<br />
<strong>Annex</strong> F<br />
79