18.10.2021 Views

Applied English Phonology, Second Edition ( PDFDrive )

Book about English Phonology with exercises

Book about English Phonology with exercises

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PHONOLOGY 37

2.3 Phonemic Analysis: A Mini-demo

In the following, we will review the points made thus far and briefly show

the mechanics of phonemic analysis. When we do a phonemic analysis to

establish the phonological status of a pair or a group of sounds (phonetically

similar sounds that could potentially be allophones of the same phoneme), it

is necessary to examine their distribution. They are either in contrast and

belong to separate phonemes, or represent allophones (positional variants) of

a phoneme that are in complementary distribution. The first task is to spot the

‘suspicious’ pair or group of sounds. To exemplify this, we look at the sounds

[s], [z], and [S] in English and Korean. The three sounds [s, z, S], which can be

heard during the conversations of both English and Korean speakers, reveal

the needed phonetic similarities. Namely, (a) they all share manner of articulation

features (sibilant fricatives); (b) [s] and [z] share place of articulation

(alveolar), differing only in voicing; (c) [s] and [S] share voicing (voiceless),

differing only in place of articulation. The decision on their distributional

character starts with the search for minimal pairs. When we look at English,

we find these three sounds in an overlapping distribution, in that we have the

following minimal pairs: sip [sIp] – ship [SIp] – zip [zIp]. In other words, the

sounds in question do occur in the same word position (initial) before the same

vowel, [I], and the words mean different things. From this, we can conclude

that the three sounds are in contrast and belong to three separate phonemes.

Now, let us examine the situation in Korean. The following data, although

limited in scope, are representative of the pattern in the language.

(1) [us] “upper” (8) [maSi] “delicious”

(2) [sek] “color” (9) [Sigan] “time”

(3) [kas@l] “hypothesis” (10) *[Silsu] “mistake”

(4) [saram] “person” (11) *[Sipsam] “thirteen”

(5) [sos@l] “novel” (12) [Sike] “clock”

(6) [sul] “wine” (13) [paèz@k] “cushion”

(7) [Si] “poem” (14) [inza] “greetings”

* Words that have both [s] and [S]

We start the search for the distribution of these sounds in Korean in exactly

the same way we started for English, namely by looking for minimal pairs.

The examination of the data reveals that here, unlike English, we do not have

minimal pairs to establish contrasts. Our next step is to look for near-minimal

pairs, in which the immediately preceding and the immediately following

environments are the same. We do not seem to have those either. Under such

conditions, we list the environments in which the sounds in question appear,

and ask whether the sounds occur in the same or similar environments. We

do this by putting the preceding environment to the left of a blank, and the

following environment to the right of it. The blank itself shows the place

that the sound occupies. For example, “# __ a” indicates that [s] occurs in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!