Colhoun vs RM Lumsden, COURT_Statement_of_Claim_re__R_M_.pdf February 2021
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM<br />
1. The Plaintiff, NO<strong>RM</strong>AN COLHOUN (“Norman”), is an individual who<br />
<strong>re</strong>sides in the Rural Municipality <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lumsden</strong> No. 189, in the Province <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan.<br />
2. The Plaintiff, LAURA COLHOUN (“Laura”), is an individual who <strong>re</strong>sides in<br />
the Rural Municipality <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lumsden</strong> No. 189, in the Province <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan.<br />
3. The Defendant, RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF LUMSDEN NO. 189 (the<br />
“R.M.”), is a Rural Municipality located in the Province <strong>of</strong> Saskatchewan, governed by The<br />
Municipalities Act, SS 2005, c M-36.1 (the “Municipalities Act”).<br />
History<br />
4. In or around March <strong>of</strong> 2013, the following property was purchased by<br />
Norman and Laura, which the<strong>re</strong>after has been held in joint tenancy:<br />
Blk C, Plan No. 101443823, Extension 127<br />
Surface Parcel No. 153739424<br />
(the “Property”).<br />
5. The Property was purchased by Norman and Laura with the intention <strong>of</strong><br />
subdividing same into approximately eleven (11) <strong>re</strong>sidential lots, with the <strong>re</strong>mainder <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Property being utilized for commercial purposes (the “Development”). At this time, the<br />
Property was zoned “R1-Low Valley Residential District” (“R1”) as defined in The Rural<br />
Municipality <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lumsden</strong> No. 189 Bylaw No. 7-2012 – Zoning Bylaw (the “Zoning<br />
Bylaw”).<br />
6. In or around June <strong>of</strong> 2015, a joint concept plan was submitted to the R.M. by<br />
Norman and Laura, along with two other individuals seeking to develop adjacent property<br />
(the “Joint Concept Plan”). The Joint Concept plan was <strong>re</strong>ceived and <strong>re</strong>viewed by the R.M.<br />
for approximately 5 years prior to the developers abandoning same as a <strong>re</strong>sult <strong>of</strong> delays.