24.12.2012 Views

Take me to PDF file - Online Share Trading

Take me to PDF file - Online Share Trading

Take me to PDF file - Online Share Trading

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

46<br />

their ho<strong>me</strong>work and wait for clear-cut<br />

technical and funda<strong>me</strong>ntal signals<br />

that the trend has actually reversed<br />

before entering any trade.<br />

ANCHORING<br />

A very interesting concept in<br />

behavioural finance states that we<br />

tend <strong>to</strong> hold on <strong>to</strong> certain events or<br />

figures and use them as anchors or<br />

reference points on which we base<br />

our investing decisions. This is quite<br />

common and almost everybody will<br />

identify with this example. Suppose<br />

you have bought a s<strong>to</strong>ck at `100 and it<br />

rises <strong>to</strong> `140, yet you wait for it <strong>to</strong> rise<br />

further. But the s<strong>to</strong>ck price starts<br />

falling instead and reaches `70. You<br />

then decide <strong>to</strong> get out of it if it reaches<br />

`100 again. But when it does really<br />

reach `100, you do not sell it. Instead,<br />

you say that you will wait for it <strong>to</strong><br />

reach `140 again. This is because the<br />

recent high of `140 has been<br />

anchored in your mind.<br />

Anchoring is a <strong>me</strong>ans for inves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong><br />

justify their decisions. Because the<br />

price of `140 is anchored in the<br />

inves<strong>to</strong>r’s mind, he feels that it is the<br />

correct valuation for the s<strong>to</strong>ck and the<br />

market forces are undervaluing it.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> him, the s<strong>to</strong>ck will<br />

reach the right price of `140, sooner<br />

or later. What inves<strong>to</strong>rs do not realize<br />

is that the funda<strong>me</strong>ntals of the<br />

company or so<strong>me</strong> such fac<strong>to</strong>rs could<br />

have deteriorated and that is what is<br />

being shown in the price of the s<strong>to</strong>ck.<br />

Repeated exposure <strong>to</strong> certain numbers<br />

or events can also cause anchoring.<br />

So, if you have heard one or more<br />

technical analysts on TV say that if<br />

the Nifty breaks 5,000 on the<br />

downside it can go as low as 4,700,<br />

your mind gets fixated on the number.<br />

Once the Nifty breaks the<br />

5,000-mark, even though the s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />

you want <strong>to</strong> buy is available at a very<br />

cheap rate, you still do not buy it<br />

because you feel that the markets are<br />

Beyond Market 10th Oct ’11<br />

going <strong>to</strong> fall <strong>to</strong> as low as 4,700 and<br />

you may get the s<strong>to</strong>ck even cheaper.<br />

Eventually you miss your bus.<br />

Re<strong>me</strong>dy<br />

a. Forget the highs and lows.<br />

b. Do your ho<strong>me</strong>work properly. Plan<br />

your entry and exits in advance and<br />

stick <strong>to</strong> it.<br />

c. Keep a sharp eye on any news<br />

regarding internal changes or those<br />

revolving around the company or the<br />

industry on the whole.<br />

ENDOWMENT EFFECT<br />

Suppose your friend has gifted you a<br />

digital ca<strong>me</strong>ra worth `5,000 for your<br />

birthday. But since you already have a<br />

digital ca<strong>me</strong>ra of your own, you<br />

decide <strong>to</strong> sell it off. At what price<br />

would you sell it for? Obviously, for<br />

nothing less than `5,000 even though<br />

you have not spent a single rupee <strong>to</strong><br />

purchase the ca<strong>me</strong>ra.<br />

Now consider a second scenario. You<br />

are in need of a digital ca<strong>me</strong>ra and<br />

instead of gifting you the ca<strong>me</strong>ra, you<br />

friend offers <strong>to</strong> sell it <strong>to</strong> you. You<br />

know that the price of the ca<strong>me</strong>ra in<br />

the market is `5,000. What is the<br />

price that you are willing <strong>to</strong> offer <strong>to</strong><br />

your friend <strong>to</strong> buy the ca<strong>me</strong>ra? Most<br />

of us would be willing <strong>to</strong> offer just<br />

`4000 or even less. Why then are we<br />

not ready <strong>to</strong> sell for less than `5,000<br />

and want <strong>to</strong> buy it at a lesser price?<br />

This is called the Endow<strong>me</strong>nt Effect,<br />

which states that humans believe that<br />

so<strong>me</strong>thing that belongs <strong>to</strong> them is<br />

much more valuable than so<strong>me</strong>thing<br />

that belongs <strong>to</strong> others. Humans<br />

experience a lot of pain when parting<br />

with objects they own. Hence, we<br />

note that we press the ‘buy’ but<strong>to</strong>n<br />

very easily but pressing the ‘sell’<br />

but<strong>to</strong>n is very difficult.<br />

Thus, if you have bought a s<strong>to</strong>ck at<br />

`100, you would ideally not part with<br />

it if you are not getting `120 or more.<br />

Endow<strong>me</strong>nt is the reason why people<br />

hold on <strong>to</strong> their losing s<strong>to</strong>cks. They<br />

feel that just because they own it and<br />

have bought it at a certain price, the<br />

sell price that they are demanding is<br />

justified and anything less than that<br />

would be doing injustice <strong>to</strong> the s<strong>to</strong>ck.<br />

This right price may never co<strong>me</strong> and<br />

they are stuck with the s<strong>to</strong>ck for life.<br />

Re<strong>me</strong>dy<br />

Plain and simple. Do not get married<br />

<strong>to</strong> your s<strong>to</strong>ck. Be prompt <strong>to</strong> lock-in<br />

profits and do not hesitate <strong>to</strong> book<br />

losses when needed.<br />

CONFIRMATION BIAS<br />

People tend <strong>to</strong> think only in a manner<br />

that suits their preconceived notions<br />

or thoughts. Hence, when processing<br />

information they focus only on<br />

information that confirms with their<br />

line of thinking. Any contradiction or<br />

opposing thoughts are comfortably<br />

ignored. This is known as<br />

Confirmation Bias.<br />

For example, if you have a<br />

preconceived notion that only low<br />

P/E and high beta s<strong>to</strong>cks are<br />

multibaggers in the long run, you will<br />

search only for those s<strong>to</strong>cks that fulfil<br />

these two criteria.<br />

Furthermore, once you have<br />

identified such s<strong>to</strong>cks, you will<br />

reaffirm your argu<strong>me</strong>nt by focussing<br />

only on the positive news surrounding<br />

these s<strong>to</strong>cks such as high net profit,<br />

increased sales, etc. Any negative<br />

news about the s<strong>to</strong>ck is completely<br />

ignored. This sort of view can prove<br />

<strong>to</strong> be very disastrous as it provides<br />

only a one-sided view and obliterates<br />

the complete picture.<br />

Re<strong>me</strong>dy<br />

Carefully process all the news about a<br />

s<strong>to</strong>ck - positive as well as negative.<br />

Assess all the pros and cons, weigh<br />

the risk <strong>to</strong> reward ratio and only then<br />

take an infor<strong>me</strong>d decisioN.<br />

It’s simplified...

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!