Take me to PDF file - Online Share Trading
Take me to PDF file - Online Share Trading
Take me to PDF file - Online Share Trading
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
46<br />
their ho<strong>me</strong>work and wait for clear-cut<br />
technical and funda<strong>me</strong>ntal signals<br />
that the trend has actually reversed<br />
before entering any trade.<br />
ANCHORING<br />
A very interesting concept in<br />
behavioural finance states that we<br />
tend <strong>to</strong> hold on <strong>to</strong> certain events or<br />
figures and use them as anchors or<br />
reference points on which we base<br />
our investing decisions. This is quite<br />
common and almost everybody will<br />
identify with this example. Suppose<br />
you have bought a s<strong>to</strong>ck at `100 and it<br />
rises <strong>to</strong> `140, yet you wait for it <strong>to</strong> rise<br />
further. But the s<strong>to</strong>ck price starts<br />
falling instead and reaches `70. You<br />
then decide <strong>to</strong> get out of it if it reaches<br />
`100 again. But when it does really<br />
reach `100, you do not sell it. Instead,<br />
you say that you will wait for it <strong>to</strong><br />
reach `140 again. This is because the<br />
recent high of `140 has been<br />
anchored in your mind.<br />
Anchoring is a <strong>me</strong>ans for inves<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong><br />
justify their decisions. Because the<br />
price of `140 is anchored in the<br />
inves<strong>to</strong>r’s mind, he feels that it is the<br />
correct valuation for the s<strong>to</strong>ck and the<br />
market forces are undervaluing it.<br />
According <strong>to</strong> him, the s<strong>to</strong>ck will<br />
reach the right price of `140, sooner<br />
or later. What inves<strong>to</strong>rs do not realize<br />
is that the funda<strong>me</strong>ntals of the<br />
company or so<strong>me</strong> such fac<strong>to</strong>rs could<br />
have deteriorated and that is what is<br />
being shown in the price of the s<strong>to</strong>ck.<br />
Repeated exposure <strong>to</strong> certain numbers<br />
or events can also cause anchoring.<br />
So, if you have heard one or more<br />
technical analysts on TV say that if<br />
the Nifty breaks 5,000 on the<br />
downside it can go as low as 4,700,<br />
your mind gets fixated on the number.<br />
Once the Nifty breaks the<br />
5,000-mark, even though the s<strong>to</strong>ck<br />
you want <strong>to</strong> buy is available at a very<br />
cheap rate, you still do not buy it<br />
because you feel that the markets are<br />
Beyond Market 10th Oct ’11<br />
going <strong>to</strong> fall <strong>to</strong> as low as 4,700 and<br />
you may get the s<strong>to</strong>ck even cheaper.<br />
Eventually you miss your bus.<br />
Re<strong>me</strong>dy<br />
a. Forget the highs and lows.<br />
b. Do your ho<strong>me</strong>work properly. Plan<br />
your entry and exits in advance and<br />
stick <strong>to</strong> it.<br />
c. Keep a sharp eye on any news<br />
regarding internal changes or those<br />
revolving around the company or the<br />
industry on the whole.<br />
ENDOWMENT EFFECT<br />
Suppose your friend has gifted you a<br />
digital ca<strong>me</strong>ra worth `5,000 for your<br />
birthday. But since you already have a<br />
digital ca<strong>me</strong>ra of your own, you<br />
decide <strong>to</strong> sell it off. At what price<br />
would you sell it for? Obviously, for<br />
nothing less than `5,000 even though<br />
you have not spent a single rupee <strong>to</strong><br />
purchase the ca<strong>me</strong>ra.<br />
Now consider a second scenario. You<br />
are in need of a digital ca<strong>me</strong>ra and<br />
instead of gifting you the ca<strong>me</strong>ra, you<br />
friend offers <strong>to</strong> sell it <strong>to</strong> you. You<br />
know that the price of the ca<strong>me</strong>ra in<br />
the market is `5,000. What is the<br />
price that you are willing <strong>to</strong> offer <strong>to</strong><br />
your friend <strong>to</strong> buy the ca<strong>me</strong>ra? Most<br />
of us would be willing <strong>to</strong> offer just<br />
`4000 or even less. Why then are we<br />
not ready <strong>to</strong> sell for less than `5,000<br />
and want <strong>to</strong> buy it at a lesser price?<br />
This is called the Endow<strong>me</strong>nt Effect,<br />
which states that humans believe that<br />
so<strong>me</strong>thing that belongs <strong>to</strong> them is<br />
much more valuable than so<strong>me</strong>thing<br />
that belongs <strong>to</strong> others. Humans<br />
experience a lot of pain when parting<br />
with objects they own. Hence, we<br />
note that we press the ‘buy’ but<strong>to</strong>n<br />
very easily but pressing the ‘sell’<br />
but<strong>to</strong>n is very difficult.<br />
Thus, if you have bought a s<strong>to</strong>ck at<br />
`100, you would ideally not part with<br />
it if you are not getting `120 or more.<br />
Endow<strong>me</strong>nt is the reason why people<br />
hold on <strong>to</strong> their losing s<strong>to</strong>cks. They<br />
feel that just because they own it and<br />
have bought it at a certain price, the<br />
sell price that they are demanding is<br />
justified and anything less than that<br />
would be doing injustice <strong>to</strong> the s<strong>to</strong>ck.<br />
This right price may never co<strong>me</strong> and<br />
they are stuck with the s<strong>to</strong>ck for life.<br />
Re<strong>me</strong>dy<br />
Plain and simple. Do not get married<br />
<strong>to</strong> your s<strong>to</strong>ck. Be prompt <strong>to</strong> lock-in<br />
profits and do not hesitate <strong>to</strong> book<br />
losses when needed.<br />
CONFIRMATION BIAS<br />
People tend <strong>to</strong> think only in a manner<br />
that suits their preconceived notions<br />
or thoughts. Hence, when processing<br />
information they focus only on<br />
information that confirms with their<br />
line of thinking. Any contradiction or<br />
opposing thoughts are comfortably<br />
ignored. This is known as<br />
Confirmation Bias.<br />
For example, if you have a<br />
preconceived notion that only low<br />
P/E and high beta s<strong>to</strong>cks are<br />
multibaggers in the long run, you will<br />
search only for those s<strong>to</strong>cks that fulfil<br />
these two criteria.<br />
Furthermore, once you have<br />
identified such s<strong>to</strong>cks, you will<br />
reaffirm your argu<strong>me</strong>nt by focussing<br />
only on the positive news surrounding<br />
these s<strong>to</strong>cks such as high net profit,<br />
increased sales, etc. Any negative<br />
news about the s<strong>to</strong>ck is completely<br />
ignored. This sort of view can prove<br />
<strong>to</strong> be very disastrous as it provides<br />
only a one-sided view and obliterates<br />
the complete picture.<br />
Re<strong>me</strong>dy<br />
Carefully process all the news about a<br />
s<strong>to</strong>ck - positive as well as negative.<br />
Assess all the pros and cons, weigh<br />
the risk <strong>to</strong> reward ratio and only then<br />
take an infor<strong>me</strong>d decisioN.<br />
It’s simplified...