Organised crime with a Posh Accent.

The Ministry of Justice who apparently work to protect and advance the principles of Justice - Whose repeated false representations through their Barrister leading to a Coroner's Inquest being launched into the death of Saul Altal on an entirely false basis in the absence of any direct proof of Saul Altal's death DOB December 8th 1982 and in the absence of any evidence that Saul Altal is still alive and with no sufficient evidence that Saul Altal's death has taken place, made evident by the Government's Legal Department disclosure evidence that clearly summarised Saul Turner as deceased coupled by a hospital physician at the Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford providing certification that identified Saul Turner DOB December 8th 1983 as deceased and documented the circumstances of the death identifying and noting the individuals present at the moment of death, and filling out the necessary paperwork required by law regarding confirmation of death assessment with Identity confirmed by hospital wristband and General inspection assessment including time of death - leading to the question, what evidence and law applied to the death of Saul Altal? All of which reflects serious intentional misconduct by Government official's that contributed to the fraudulent inquest into the death of Saul Altal, misconduct that distorts the evidence to determine how Saul Turner the deceased came by his premeditated death. Such levels of Corruption, where does the law stand on this?

The Ministry of Justice who apparently work to protect and advance the principles of Justice - Whose repeated false representations through their Barrister leading to a Coroner's Inquest being launched into the death of Saul Altal on an entirely false basis in the absence of any direct proof of Saul Altal's death DOB December 8th 1982 and in the absence of any evidence that Saul Altal is still alive and with no sufficient evidence that Saul Altal's death has taken place, made evident by the Government's Legal Department disclosure evidence that clearly summarised Saul Turner as deceased coupled by a hospital physician at the Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford providing certification that identified Saul Turner DOB December 8th 1983 as deceased and documented the circumstances of the death identifying and noting the individuals present at the moment of death, and filling out the necessary paperwork required by law regarding confirmation of death assessment with Identity confirmed by hospital wristband and General inspection assessment including time of death - leading to the question, what evidence and law applied to the death of Saul Altal? All of which reflects serious intentional misconduct by Government official's that contributed to the fraudulent inquest into the death of Saul Altal, misconduct that distorts the evidence to determine how Saul Turner the deceased came by his premeditated death. Such levels of Corruption, where does the law stand on this?