26.12.2012 Views

Project Number: FP6-IST-507554 Project Title: BROADBAND in ...

Project Number: FP6-IST-507554 Project Title: BROADBAND in ...

Project Number: FP6-IST-507554 Project Title: BROADBAND in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 18 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

provision of broadcast<strong>in</strong>g over Internet. If a service is used by the majority of people, it is a waste of resources<br />

to provide it through a switched/routed network, as it can easily be broadcast to all people us<strong>in</strong>g broadcast<br />

networks.<br />

One scenario might be that Web-TV (world-wide web pages delivered over broadcast TV) co-evolves with<br />

digital TV and exists as a complementary and competitive platform to other delivery networks. As a<br />

complementary platform, special types of services that will not be provided on other platforms can be provided<br />

on the Internet. As a competitive platform, special narrowcast types of services provided on cable and satellite<br />

delivery networks could be provided on the Internet and compete with these <strong>in</strong>frastructures for some broadcast<br />

services.<br />

One of the major barriers for convergence relates to the transport and delivery part (i.e. the <strong>in</strong>frastructure part) of<br />

the value cha<strong>in</strong>. It has been shown that although digitalisation is a major parameter, it is still only one amongst<br />

several parameters that <strong>in</strong>fluence convergence at the <strong>in</strong>frastructure level. It is also important, to emphasise that<br />

the success or failure of convergence is not directly connected to the capability of one <strong>in</strong>frastructure to <strong>in</strong>tegrate<br />

all services.<br />

None of the <strong>in</strong>frastructures available can <strong>in</strong>tegrate all the services <strong>in</strong> their current state. While <strong>in</strong>tegration of the<br />

back-bone parts of the networks have had better conditions to evolve, <strong>in</strong>tegration of the last mile coverage has<br />

been shown to be dependent on many different parameters. However, some <strong>in</strong>frastructures have better potential<br />

to be upgraded to <strong>in</strong>tegrate more types of services. Cable TV networks are examples of this. On cable networks,<br />

it is possible to offer several broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services of acceptable quality and at the same time deliver Internet<br />

and basic telecom services. Also new LAN types of networks <strong>in</strong> residential areas (and different wireless<br />

solutions com<strong>in</strong>g onto the market) can provide acceptable performance levels. However, when upgrad<strong>in</strong>g cable<br />

TV networks and establish<strong>in</strong>g new networks large additional <strong>in</strong>vestments must be made, and it is often not<br />

economical to do so.<br />

One way of implement<strong>in</strong>g convergence and deliver<strong>in</strong>g ‘convergence services’ is to utilise the synergy between<br />

different networks and consequently to utilise the strength of different networks. In this way, different<br />

components of the same service can be transported over different networks. This organisation of heterogeneous<br />

networks can be totally seamless for the end-user and function like an <strong>in</strong>tegrated network.<br />

There are, therefore, choices to be made between a pure <strong>in</strong>tegration model and a heterogeneous network model.<br />

This choice depends partly on the characteristics of the types of communication <strong>in</strong> question and the<br />

characteristics of different k<strong>in</strong>ds of networks and partly on the history of network development <strong>in</strong> different<br />

countries. There is a certa<strong>in</strong> path dependency <strong>in</strong> the possible choices countries make, h<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g on the former<br />

history of network development. Convergence of networks implies a development where the same services will<br />

be offered through different types of networks (e.g. UMTS, FWA and copper-based or optical wired networks).<br />

6.3 Convergence of term<strong>in</strong>als<br />

Term<strong>in</strong>al convergence denotes the com<strong>in</strong>g together of consumer devices such as fixed and mobile phones, the<br />

television and the personal computer. Penetration of TV sets is much higher than PC term<strong>in</strong>als. TV sets are by<br />

far the most universal household communication term<strong>in</strong>al. Provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractive services, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Internet, on<br />

TV can potentially benefit especially the ‘<strong>in</strong>formation poor’ and thus reduce the ‘<strong>in</strong>formation gap’ <strong>in</strong> many<br />

countries. This is an important implication of convergence, as a major part of the population of many countries<br />

will only benefit from new broadband services of network economies if it can receive the Internet services on<br />

TV.<br />

The PC term<strong>in</strong>al is develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a real competitor to the TV set as an access device to broadcast services.<br />

Additional low cost TV tuner cards are needed to be able to see traditional broadcast services on a PC. The PC is<br />

a well-designed medium for consumption of Internet services and is a good medium for convergence of a wide<br />

variety of services. But here also the way of use will be a vital parameter that determ<strong>in</strong>es the services for which<br />

the PC term<strong>in</strong>al and TV set will be substitutes.<br />

The development <strong>in</strong> the past five years shows, however, that the direction of convergence is not only br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

together traditional services provided over different consumer term<strong>in</strong>als. There is also a trend towards the<br />

development of a variety of different access term<strong>in</strong>als for dedicated services and applications. The trend to<br />

service <strong>in</strong>tegration is be<strong>in</strong>g paralleled by a trend towards a new diversification.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!