26.12.2012 Views

Project Number: FP6-IST-507554 Project Title: BROADBAND in ...

Project Number: FP6-IST-507554 Project Title: BROADBAND in ...

Project Number: FP6-IST-507554 Project Title: BROADBAND in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Project</strong> <strong>Number</strong>: <strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong><br />

<strong>Project</strong> <strong>Title</strong>: <strong>BROADBAND</strong> <strong>in</strong> Europe for All: A Multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary Approach<br />

CEC Deliverable <strong>Number</strong>: <strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Contractual Date of Deliverable to the IS DG: 30/06/2005<br />

Actual Date of Delivery to the IS DG: 01/08/2005<br />

<strong>Title</strong> of Deliverable:<br />

Workpackage contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the Deliverable:<br />

Nature of the Deliverable R – Report<br />

Second report on the multi-technological analysis of the<br />

‘broadband for all’ concept, focus on the list<strong>in</strong>g of multitechnological<br />

key issues and practical roadmaps on how to<br />

tackle these issues.<br />

WP2: Multi-technological analysis<br />

WP3: Techno-economic, socio-economic and policy studies<br />

Editors: JCP: Po<strong>in</strong>t J. C. JRC: Ulbrich M. IMEC: Van Daele P.<br />

Contributors:<br />

Voluntary contributors:<br />

IMEC De Turck F., Dhoedt B., Pickavet M., Vlaem<strong>in</strong>ck K., Stevens T.,<br />

Lannoo B., Colle D., Demeester P.<br />

UEssex O’ Mahony M., Politi T., Bray M.<br />

COM Falch M., Schneider M., Sigurdsson H., Skouby K. E., Berger M.,<br />

Christiansen H., Ruepp S., Soler J.<br />

GET Erasme D., M<strong>in</strong>ot, C., Temoori H., Bristiel B.<br />

HHI Faber J., Grosskopf G., Patzak E., Helmolt C.v., Langer K,<br />

Vathke J.<br />

TELSCOM Rao S., Vogel P.<br />

JCP Guillemot C., Million P.<br />

Hadjifotiou T. (University of Essex), Grace D. (University of York),<br />

Tuomi I. (Mean<strong>in</strong>g Process<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

Abstract:<br />

This report is the second deliverable of the <strong>FP6</strong>-project “Broadband <strong>in</strong> Europe for all: a multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary approach project<br />

(BREAD)”. It is a multi-technological analysis of the ‘broadband for all’ concept, with an update of the list<strong>in</strong>g of multitechnological<br />

key issues, a first gap analysis and first roadmaps on how to tackle these issues.<br />

The deliverable also conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation on ongo<strong>in</strong>g regional and national broadband <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> Europe (EU25) and<br />

around the world. The <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>cludes an analysis of the broadband market <strong>in</strong> these countries with overview of available<br />

technologies, <strong>in</strong>frastructures, operators, pric<strong>in</strong>g,…. It also <strong>in</strong>cludes a summary of the broadband policy <strong>in</strong> these countries.<br />

This document builds further on the overview of the state-of-the-art on broadband issues, summarized <strong>in</strong> the first BREADdeliverable<br />

(available via www.ist-bread.org)<br />

Out of the country studies, an analysis is presented factors affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband development first from a classical theoretical<br />

framework, which is composed of the supply/demand - <strong>in</strong>frastructure/content matrix. However, when draw<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

elements which were identified <strong>in</strong> the country studies, it then uses a framework composed of four categories, i.e. country<br />

configuration, legacy situation, competition, and public policy, where the key criterion is the susceptibility of the factors<br />

affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband to be themselves <strong>in</strong>fluenced by broadband policy. This approach allows identify<strong>in</strong>g those areas where<br />

government action can really make a difference. F<strong>in</strong>ally a quick look is taken at some potential <strong>in</strong>hibitors of broadband<br />

development and at broadband applications and user needs.<br />

This document does not claim to be complete, but is <strong>in</strong>tended to give directions, <strong>in</strong>dications and current trends <strong>in</strong> the field and<br />

will evoke <strong>in</strong>put on new projects, new technologies and new developments to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the next editions of this<br />

deliverable..<br />

Keyword list:<br />

Broadband for All, multi-technological, multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary analysis, socio-economic


Disclaimer<br />

Page 2 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The <strong>in</strong>formation, documentation and figures available <strong>in</strong> this deliverable, is written by the BREAD (“Broadband<br />

<strong>in</strong> Europe for all: a multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary approach project (BREAD)” – project consortium under EC co-f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

contract <strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong> and does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission


1. Executive Summary<br />

Page 3 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

This report is the second deliverable of the <strong>FP6</strong>-project “Broadband <strong>in</strong> Europe for all: a multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

approach project (BREAD)”. It is a multi-technological analysis of the ‘broadband for all’ concept, with an<br />

update of the list<strong>in</strong>g of multi-technological key issues, a first gap analysis and first roadmaps on how to tackle<br />

these issues.<br />

The deliverable also conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation on ongo<strong>in</strong>g regional and national broadband <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

(EU25) and around the world. The <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>cludes an analysis of the broadband market <strong>in</strong> these countries<br />

with overview of available technologies, <strong>in</strong>frastructures, operators, pric<strong>in</strong>g,…. It also <strong>in</strong>cludes a summary of the<br />

broadband policy <strong>in</strong> these countries.<br />

This document builds further on the overview of the state-of-the-art on broadband issues, summarized <strong>in</strong> the first<br />

BREAD-deliverable (available via www.ist-bread.org)<br />

Out of the country studies, an analysis is presented factors affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband development first from a<br />

classical theoretical framework, which is composed of the supply/demand - <strong>in</strong>frastructure/content matrix.<br />

However, when draw<strong>in</strong>g on the elements which were identified <strong>in</strong> the country studies, it then uses a framework<br />

composed of four categories, i.e. country configuration, legacy situation, competition, and public policy, where<br />

the key criterion is the susceptibility of the factors affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband to be themselves <strong>in</strong>fluenced by<br />

broadband policy. This approach allows identify<strong>in</strong>g those areas where government action can really make a<br />

difference. F<strong>in</strong>ally a quick look is taken at some potential <strong>in</strong>hibitors of broadband development and at broadband<br />

applications and user needs.<br />

This document does not claim to be complete, but is <strong>in</strong>tended to give directions, <strong>in</strong>dications and current trends <strong>in</strong><br />

the field and will evoke <strong>in</strong>put on new projects, new technologies and new developments to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the<br />

next editions of this deliverable.


2. Table of Contents<br />

Page 4 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

DISCLAIMER........................................................................................................................................2<br />

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................3<br />

2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................4<br />

3. L<strong>IST</strong> OF ABBREVIATIONS......................................................................................................9<br />

4. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................12<br />

5. RELATED PROJECTS AND STANDARDISATION ...........................................................14<br />

6. ICT CONVERGENCE ..............................................................................................................16<br />

6.1 Convergence of services.............................................................................................................16<br />

6.2 Convergence of networks ..........................................................................................................17<br />

6.3 Convergence of term<strong>in</strong>als..........................................................................................................18<br />

6.4 Convergence of markets ............................................................................................................19<br />

6.4.1 Vertical Integration 19<br />

6.4.2 Market convergence across <strong>in</strong>dustries 19<br />

6.4.3 Convergence <strong>in</strong> markets for content and services 19<br />

6.4.4 Convergence between distribut<strong>in</strong>g companies 20<br />

6.4.5 Convergence between equipment manufactures 20<br />

6.4.6 Divergence of markets 21<br />

6.5 Convergence of regulation.........................................................................................................21<br />

6.5.1 General Societal Importance 21<br />

6.5.2 Access to Networks and Content 21<br />

6.5.3 Technology Neutral Regulation 22<br />

6.5.4 Network and media concentration 22<br />

6.5.5 Converg<strong>in</strong>g Content Regulation and other content issues 22<br />

7. <strong>BROADBAND</strong> TECHNOLOGIES SUMMARY ....................................................................24<br />

7.1 HOME NETWORK (wireless)..................................................................................................27<br />

7.1.1 Introduction 27<br />

7.1.2 Home Networks: Technologies / Standardisation 28<br />

7.1.3 Issues and Trends / Gap analysis 31<br />

7.1.4 Home Networks Roadmap 32<br />

7.2 ACCESS NETWORK................................................................................................................34<br />

7.2.1 Power L<strong>in</strong>e Communications 34<br />

7.2.2 Cable 40<br />

7.2.3 Broadband Wireless Access 47<br />

7.2.4 Mobile 53<br />

7.2.5 Satellite 55<br />

7.2.6 xDSL 59<br />

7.2.7 FTTx 61<br />

7.2.8 DVB-T 67<br />

7.2.9 HAP 69<br />

7.3 GENERAL TOPICS IN ACCESS............................................................................................72<br />

7.3.1 Convergence <strong>in</strong> networks and services 72<br />

7.3.2 Video and Broadband networks 76<br />

7.3.3 Physical access Architectures 84<br />

7.3.4 Signall<strong>in</strong>g 85


Page 5 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.3.5 IPv6 86<br />

7.3.6 Physical layer aspects 89<br />

7.3.7 Disturbance <strong>in</strong> PLC, Cable and DSL access networks 95<br />

7.4 CORE AND METRO ................................................................................................................97<br />

7.4.1 Optical Network - The <strong>in</strong>terface between network segments 97<br />

7.4.2 Optical metro/CWDM 97<br />

7.4.3 Optical Backbone 103<br />

7.4.4 Grid networks 115<br />

7.5 END-TO-END ..........................................................................................................................120<br />

7.5.1 Security 120<br />

7.5.2 Overall management and control 126<br />

7.5.3 IPv6 134<br />

8. MARKET DEVELOPMENTS & POLICY ASPECTS........................................................137<br />

8.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................137<br />

8.1.1 Broadband <strong>in</strong>dicators 137<br />

8.1.2 Broadband market developments 138<br />

8.1.3 General regulatory aspects 141<br />

8.2 European Union .......................................................................................................................142<br />

8.2.1 Introduction 142<br />

8.2.2 The broadband market 142<br />

8.2.3 Broadband policy 143<br />

8.2.4 Conclusion 143<br />

8.3 Austria.......................................................................................................................................144<br />

8.3.1 Introduction 144<br />

8.3.2 The broadband market 144<br />

8.3.3 Broadband policy 148<br />

8.3.4 Conclusion 148<br />

8.4 Belgium .....................................................................................................................................149<br />

8.4.1 Introduction 149<br />

8.4.2 The broadband market 150<br />

8.4.3 Broadband policy 151<br />

8.5 Cyprus.......................................................................................................................................152<br />

8.5.1 Introduction 152<br />

8.5.2 The broadband market 152<br />

8.5.3 Broadband policy 152<br />

8.6 Czech Republic.........................................................................................................................153<br />

8.6.1 Introduction 153<br />

8.6.2 The broadband market 153<br />

8.6.3 Broadband policy 153<br />

8.6.4 Conclusion 154<br />

8.7 Denmark ...................................................................................................................................155<br />

8.7.1 Introduction 155<br />

8.7.2 The broadband market 155<br />

8.7.3 Broadband policy 157<br />

8.7.4 Conclusion 162<br />

8.8 Estonia.......................................................................................................................................163<br />

8.8.1 Introduction 163<br />

8.8.2 The broadband market 163<br />

8.8.3 Broadband policy 163<br />

8.8.4 Conclusion 164<br />

8.9 F<strong>in</strong>land ......................................................................................................................................165<br />

8.9.1 Introduction 165<br />

8.9.2 The broadband market 165<br />

8.9.3 Broadband policy 177<br />

8.10 France........................................................................................................................................181<br />

8.10.1 Introduction 181<br />

8.10.2 The broadband market 181


Page 6 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

8.10.3 Broadband policy 184<br />

8.10.4 Conclusion 184<br />

8.11 Germany ...................................................................................................................................185<br />

8.11.1 Introduction 185<br />

8.11.2 The broadband market 185<br />

8.11.3 Broadband policy 188<br />

8.11.4 Conclusion 188<br />

8.12 Greece........................................................................................................................................191<br />

8.13 Hungary ....................................................................................................................................192<br />

8.13.1 Introduction 192<br />

8.13.2 Demand 192<br />

8.13.3 Broadband policy 194<br />

8.14 Ireland.......................................................................................................................................195<br />

8.14.1 Introduction 195<br />

8.14.2 The broadband market 195<br />

8.14.3 Broadband policy 195<br />

8.14.4 Conclusion 197<br />

8.15 Italy............................................................................................................................................198<br />

8.15.1 Introduction 198<br />

8.15.2 The broadband market 198<br />

8.15.3 Broadband policy 198<br />

8.15.4 Conclusion 199<br />

8.16 Latvia ........................................................................................................................................200<br />

8.16.1 Introduction 200<br />

8.16.2 The broadband market 200<br />

8.16.3 Broadband policy 200<br />

8.16.4 Conclusion 201<br />

8.17 Lithuania...................................................................................................................................202<br />

8.17.1 Introduction 202<br />

8.17.2 The broadband market 202<br />

8.17.3 Broadband policy 202<br />

8.17.4 Conclusion 203<br />

8.18 Luxembourg .............................................................................................................................204<br />

8.18.1 Introduction 204<br />

8.18.2 The broadband market 204<br />

8.18.3 Broadband policy 208<br />

8.19 Malta .........................................................................................................................................209<br />

8.19.1 Introduction 209<br />

8.19.2 The broadband market 209<br />

8.19.3 Broadband policy 210<br />

8.20 Poland........................................................................................................................................211<br />

8.20.1 Introduction 211<br />

8.20.2 The broadband market 211<br />

8.20.3 Broadband policy 211<br />

8.20.4 Conclusion 212<br />

8.21 Portugal.....................................................................................................................................213<br />

8.21.1 Introduction 213<br />

8.21.2 The broadband market 213<br />

8.21.3 Broadband policy 213<br />

8.21.4 Conclusion 214<br />

8.22 Slovakia.....................................................................................................................................215<br />

8.22.1 Introduction 215<br />

8.22.2 The broadband market 215<br />

8.22.3 Broadband policy 215<br />

8.22.4 Conclusion 216<br />

8.23 Slovenia .....................................................................................................................................217<br />

8.23.1 Introduction 217<br />

8.23.2 The broadband market 217


Page 7 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

8.23.3 Broadband policy 217<br />

8.23.4 Conclusion 218<br />

8.24 Spa<strong>in</strong>..........................................................................................................................................219<br />

8.24.1 Introduction 219<br />

8.24.2 The broadband market 219<br />

8.24.3 Broadband policy 221<br />

8.24.4 Conclusion 221<br />

8.25 Sweden ......................................................................................................................................222<br />

8.25.1 Introduction 222<br />

8.25.2 The broadband market 222<br />

8.25.3 Broadband policy 225<br />

8.25.4 Appendix 227<br />

8.26 The Netherlands .......................................................................................................................228<br />

8.26.1 Introduction 228<br />

8.26.2 The broadband market 228<br />

8.26.3 Broadband policy 230<br />

8.26.4 Conclusion 231<br />

8.27 United K<strong>in</strong>gdom .......................................................................................................................232<br />

8.27.1 Introduction 232<br />

8.27.2 The broadband market 232<br />

8.27.3 Broadband policy 233<br />

8.27.4 Conclusion 233<br />

8.27.5 Appendix 234<br />

8.28 Non-EU country studies: United States..................................................................................240<br />

8.28.1 Introduction 240<br />

8.28.2 The broadband market 240<br />

8.28.3 Broadband policy 247<br />

8.28.4 Conclusion 250<br />

8.28.5 ANNEX State Broadband Initiatives (Resources (taken from the 2004 APT report) 250<br />

8.29 Non-EU country studies: Japan..............................................................................................254<br />

8.29.1 Introduction 254<br />

8.29.2 The broadband market 254<br />

8.29.3 Broadband policy 262<br />

8.29.4 Conclusion 262<br />

8.30 Non-EU country studies: South Korea...................................................................................263<br />

8.30.1 Introduction 263<br />

8.30.2 The broadband market 264<br />

8.30.3 Broadband policy 278<br />

8.30.4 Conclusion 280<br />

8.30.5 Annex: Broadband diffusion factors <strong>in</strong> various studies. 283<br />

8.31 Non-EU country studies: Canada...........................................................................................284<br />

8.31.1 Introduction 284<br />

8.31.2 The broadband market 284<br />

8.31.3 Broadband policy 288<br />

8.31.4 Conclusion 290<br />

8.32 Non-EU country studies: Iceland............................................................................................291<br />

8.32.1 Introduction 291<br />

8.32.2 The broadband market 291<br />

8.32.3 Broadband policy 294<br />

8.32.4 Conclusion 295<br />

9. HOW TO ACHIEVE <strong>BROADBAND</strong> FOR ALL..................................................................296<br />

9.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................296<br />

9.1.1 Supply of content 296<br />

9.1.2 Supply of <strong>in</strong>frastructure 297<br />

9.1.3 Demand for content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure services 298<br />

9.2 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g broadband development ........................................................................299<br />

9.2.1 Country configuration 299


Page 8 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

9.2.2 Legacy situation 301<br />

9.2.3 Competition 303<br />

9.2.4 Public policy 305<br />

9.3 Inhibitors ..................................................................................................................................308<br />

9.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................309<br />

10. <strong>BROADBAND</strong> APPLICATIONS AND USER NEEDS .......................................................310<br />

10.1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................310<br />

10.2 Reasons why end users should benefit from broadband applications.................................310<br />

10.2.1 High bandwidth as factor of efficiency and convenience of <strong>in</strong>ternet applications. 310<br />

10.2.2 High bandwidth as necessary prerequisite for effective use of applications: 311<br />

10.3 Extent to which broadband applications are already available or may be expected<br />

<strong>in</strong> future.....................................................................................................................................311<br />

10.3.1 Available applications benefit<strong>in</strong>g from broadband access because of high efficiency and<br />

convenience 311<br />

10.3.2 Available applications benefit<strong>in</strong>g from high bandwidth as necessary prerequisite for their<br />

effective use 313<br />

10.3.3 Potential future applications benefit<strong>in</strong>g from high bandwidth 315<br />

10.4 Reasons that threaten usability and usefulness of broadband applications .......................316<br />

10.5 Measures to ensure usability and usefulness as prerequisites of demand for<br />

broadband applications ...........................................................................................................318


3. List of abbreviations<br />

3R Re-Amplification, Re-Tim<strong>in</strong>g and Reshap<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ADSL Asymmetric Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

AH Authentication Header<br />

APD Avalanche Photo Diode<br />

APON ATM Passive Optical Network<br />

ASE Amplified Spontaneous Emission<br />

ASON Automatically Switched Optical Network<br />

ATDMA Advanced Time Division Multiple Access<br />

ATM Asynchronous Transfer Mode<br />

ASTN Automatic Switched Transport Network<br />

AWG Arrayed Waveguide Grat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

BER Bit Error Rate<br />

BFWA Broadband Fixed Wireless Access<br />

BPON Broadband PON<br />

BS/PS Burst Switch<strong>in</strong>g/Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

BWA Broadband Wireless Access<br />

BWDM Band Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

CAPEX CAPital EXpenditure<br />

CC Congestion Control<br />

CDMA Code Division Multiple Access<br />

CDR Clock Data Recovery<br />

CO Central Office<br />

CPN Consumer Premise Network<br />

CSPF Constra<strong>in</strong>ed Shortest Path First<br />

CS-RZ Carrier Suppressed Return to Zero<br />

CWDM Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DCCP Datagram Congestion Control Protocol<br />

DCF Dispersion Compensation Fibre<br />

D-CWDM Dense – Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DES Digital Encryption Standard<br />

DFB Distributed Feedback Laser<br />

DGD Differential Group Delay<br />

DML Direct Modulation Laser<br />

DMT Discrete Multi Tone<br />

DPSK Differential Phase Shift Key<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DSF Dispersion Shifted Fibre<br />

DWDM Dense Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

DXC Digital Cross Connect<br />

EAM Electro-Absorption Modulator<br />

EDC Electronic Dispersion Compensation<br />

EDFA Erbium Doped Fibre Amplifier<br />

EDWA Erbium Doped Waveguide Amplifiers<br />

EFM(A) Ethernet <strong>in</strong> the First Mile (Alliance)<br />

EML External Modulated Laser<br />

EPON Ethernet PON<br />

ESA European Space Agency<br />

ETDM Electrical Time Doma<strong>in</strong> Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

FDD Frequency Division Duplex<br />

FDL Fibre Delay L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

FDMA Frequency Division Multiple Access<br />

FEC Forward Error Correction<br />

FGL Fiber Grat<strong>in</strong>g Laser<br />

FP Fabry Perot<br />

FSAN Full Service Access Network<br />

FTP File Transfer Protocol<br />

FTTB Fibre to the Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

FTTC Fibre to the Curb<br />

FTTCab Fiber to the Cab<strong>in</strong>et<br />

FTTH Fibre to the Home<br />

FTTN Fiber to the Node<br />

FTTP Fibre to the Premises<br />

FTTx Fibre to the x<br />

Page 9 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2


FWA Fixed Wireless Access<br />

FWM Four Wave mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

GEO Geostationary Earth Orbital<br />

GFP Generic Fram<strong>in</strong>g Procedure<br />

(G)MPLS (Generalised) Multi-Protocol Label Switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

GPON Gigabit PON<br />

GPRS General Packet Radio System<br />

HAP High Altitude Platform<br />

HDSL High Bit-Rate DSL<br />

HDTV High Def<strong>in</strong>ition TV<br />

HFC Hybrid Fibre Coaxial<br />

HOM Higher Order Mode<br />

HSCSD High Speed Circuit Switched Data<br />

IETF Internet Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Task Force<br />

InP Indium Phosphide<br />

ISDN Integrated Service Digital Network<br />

IP Internet Protocol<br />

ITU International Telecommunication Union<br />

LAN Local Area Network<br />

LCAS L<strong>in</strong>k Capacity Adjustment Scheme<br />

LCG Large Hadron Collider Comput<strong>in</strong>g Grid<br />

LEO Low Earth Orbital<br />

LHC Large Hadron Collider<br />

LMDS Local Multipo<strong>in</strong>t Distribution System<br />

LN-MZM Lithium Niobate Mach-Zehnder Modulator<br />

LSP Label Switched Path<br />

MAC Medium Access Control<br />

MAN Metropolitan Area Network<br />

MEM Micro-Electronic Mechanical System<br />

MEMS Micro-Electromechanical Systems<br />

MGCP Media Gateway Control Protocol<br />

MG-OXC Multigranular Optical Cross Connect<br />

MiMo Multiple Input Multiple Output<br />

mm Millimetre<br />

MSA Multi-Source Agreement<br />

MUX/DEMUX Multiplxer/Demultiplexer<br />

MVDS Microwave Video Distribution System<br />

MZ Mach-Zehnder (modulator)<br />

NGN Next Generation Network<br />

NG-SDH Next Generation Synchronous Digital Hierarchy<br />

NRZ Non Return to Zero<br />

OAM Optical Absorption Modulator<br />

OADM Optical Add and Drop Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

OBS Optical Burst Switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

OCDM Optical Code Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

OE Opto-Electronic<br />

OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

OFDMA Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access<br />

OIF Optical Internetwork<strong>in</strong>g Forum<br />

OLT Optical L<strong>in</strong>e Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

ONT Optical Network Term<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

ONU Optical Network Unit<br />

OPEX Operat<strong>in</strong>g Expenditure<br />

OPS Optical Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

OSI Open Systems Interconnection<br />

OSPF Open Shortest Path First<br />

OTDM Optical Time Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

OXC Optical Cross Connect<br />

PAN Personal Area Network<br />

PDH Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy<br />

PHY PHYsical layer<br />

PIN Positive-Intr<strong>in</strong>sic-Negative<br />

PKI Public Key Infrastructure<br />

PLC Power L<strong>in</strong>e Communication<br />

PMD Polarisation Mode Dispersion<br />

Page 10 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2


PON Passive Optical Network<br />

PSD Power Spectral Density<br />

PSTN Public Switched Telecommunication Network<br />

PtP P2P Po<strong>in</strong>t-to-Po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

P2P Peer-to-Peer<br />

P2MP Po<strong>in</strong>t to Multipo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

QoS Quality of Service<br />

RAU Remote Access Unit<br />

RF Radio Frequency<br />

ROADM Reconfigurable Optical Add Drop Multiplexer<br />

RPR Resilient Packet R<strong>in</strong>g<br />

RT Remote Term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

Rx Receiver<br />

RZ Return to Zero<br />

SAN Storage Area Network<br />

SCM Sub-Carrier Multiplexed<br />

SDH Synchronous Digital Hierarchy<br />

SDH/SONET Synchronous Digital Hierarchy/Synchronous Optical Network<br />

SDM Space Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

SDTV Standard Def<strong>in</strong>ition TV<br />

SIP Session Initiation Protocol<br />

SOA Semiconductor Optical Amplifier<br />

SOHO Small Office / Home Office<br />

SONET Synchronous Optical Network<br />

SME Small and Medium Enterprise<br />

SNI Server Network Interface<br />

SPF Shortest Path First<br />

SSMF Standard S<strong>in</strong>gle Mode Fiber<br />

TCP/IP Transmission control protocol/Internet protocol<br />

TDD Time Division Duplex<br />

TDM Time Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

TDMA Time Division Multiple Access<br />

TFF Th<strong>in</strong> Film Filter<br />

Tx Transmitter<br />

UA User Agent<br />

UAC User Agent Client<br />

UAS User Agent Server<br />

UNI User Network Interface<br />

UWB Ultra Wideband<br />

VC Virtual Conta<strong>in</strong>er/Virtual Concatenation<br />

VCAT Virtual Concatenation<br />

VCSEL Vertical Cavity Surface Emitt<strong>in</strong>g Laser<br />

VDSL Very-High Data Rate DSL<br />

VIPA Virtual Imaged Phased Array<br />

VO Virtual Organisation<br />

VoD Video-on-Demand<br />

VOIP Voice Over IP<br />

WAN Wide Area Network<br />

WBXC Waveband Cross Connect<br />

WDM Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

WiFi Wireless Fidelity – Any K<strong>in</strong>d of 802.11 Network<br />

WiMax Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave<br />

XFP Small Form Factor Pluggable<br />

XPM Cross Phase Modulation<br />

Z/LWPF Zero/Low Water Peak Fiber<br />

Page 11 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2


4. Introduction<br />

Page 12 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

This report is the second deliverable of the <strong>FP6</strong>-project “Broadband <strong>in</strong> Europe for all: a multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

approach project (BREAD)”. It is a multi-technological analysis of the ‘broadband for all’ concept, with an<br />

update of the list<strong>in</strong>g of multi-technological key issues, a first gap analysis and first roadmaps on how to tackle<br />

these issues.<br />

This document builds further on the first BREAD-deliverable (available via www.ist-bread.org). This<br />

deliverable (D2.1-3.1) focused on the multi-technological and multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary analysis of the ‘broadband for<br />

all’ concept with emphasis, and restricted to the ‘state of the art’ <strong>in</strong> the multi-technological doma<strong>in</strong>s and ‘what’s<br />

happen<strong>in</strong>g now’ <strong>in</strong> some of the countries of importance to the broadband deployment. That first deliverable<br />

collected <strong>in</strong>formation on ongo<strong>in</strong>g regional and national <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> Europe and around the world. In addition,<br />

the deliverable identified <strong>in</strong>itiatives, which the project team <strong>in</strong>tended to contact for further collaboration and<br />

exchange of ideas and <strong>in</strong>formation. The document also evoked new contacts which were fed <strong>in</strong>to the present<br />

deliverable.<br />

After some more general remarks concern<strong>in</strong>g the projects and organisations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the “Broadband for<br />

All”-concept (section 5 on “Related projects and standardisation”) the convergence of services, networks,<br />

term<strong>in</strong>als and markets is discussed <strong>in</strong> section 6 on “ICT convergence”. The convergence of different<br />

technologies, platforms and access possibilities and how the overall ICT convergence trends will <strong>in</strong>fluence the<br />

broadband development is discussed with a view to the regulatory and market challenges implied by<br />

convergence.<br />

The BREAD project has now updated the <strong>in</strong>formation on all major technologies <strong>in</strong>volved, which were already<br />

identified <strong>in</strong> its first deliverable. This <strong>in</strong>formation is based on the contacts and <strong>in</strong>put from other sources (<strong>FP6</strong>projects,<br />

national projects, <strong>in</strong>ternational organisations,…) and is presented <strong>in</strong> section 7 on “Broadband<br />

technologies summary”. Some of these technologies need, to our op<strong>in</strong>ion, a closer look, because of their general<br />

importance (e.g. security,…) or because it is considered as a major technological solution (cable, FTTx,…).<br />

These areas are worked out <strong>in</strong> more detail and are presented <strong>in</strong> a separate section <strong>in</strong> “Annex 2 – More<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation”. For all areas discussed <strong>in</strong> section 7 on “Broadband technologies summary”, an overview is given<br />

of the (updated) “state-of-the-art” <strong>in</strong> that area, a short summary of the socio-economic issues, together with a<br />

list<strong>in</strong>g of projects and organisations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> this specific area. For all these areas also a first “gap analysis” is<br />

presented, together with a first “roadmap”. This deliverable also synthesises these multi-technological areas and<br />

identifies and derives a list of common issues that need further attention and <strong>in</strong>teraction (security, management<br />

& control, …).<br />

The relative importance of the various technical bottlenecks identified <strong>in</strong> the BREAD vision depends to a large<br />

extent on the evolution of actual usage patterns. The evolution of these patterns, <strong>in</strong> turn, is based on the available<br />

and emerg<strong>in</strong>g applications and technologies, underly<strong>in</strong>g social behaviour, and social and organisational practices<br />

that create communication and <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g needs. Social, economic and technical forces are<br />

<strong>in</strong>terdependent and create a complex field of development where technological opportunities become articulated<br />

and implemented, first <strong>in</strong> the laboratory or <strong>in</strong> field trials, and then on a societal scale. Only at that po<strong>in</strong>t of wide<br />

societal use, new technologies become "real" <strong>in</strong> the broader economic and societal sense. Accurate localisation<br />

of the critical bottlenecks of the BREAD vision as well as its effective realisation will therefore require a good<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of the socio-economic and technological drivers of the alternative developmental paths.<br />

Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g and comparative analyses of broadband development practices and schemes <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

context are also an important study item, to identify current and future roadblocks.<br />

This multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary aspect of the “Broadband for all”-concept becomes clear <strong>in</strong> section 8 on "Market<br />

developments & policy aspects”. In this section, all EU25 and some other <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g non-EU countries are<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g studied. This section conta<strong>in</strong>s a general description of the market developments with<strong>in</strong> electronic<br />

communication networks <strong>in</strong> particular broadband networks. Furthermore general regulatory aspects and the<br />

implications of these are described. In addition a number of country cases are <strong>in</strong>cluded. The purpose of these<br />

country cases is to provide <strong>in</strong>sights both <strong>in</strong> regional success stories and failures and to enable a further analysis<br />

of the reasons for why some countries have been more successful than others. This <strong>in</strong>cludes identification of<br />

drivers, barriers, bottlenecks and technologies impact<strong>in</strong>g the penetration of broadband.<br />

An analysis is presented with factors affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband development first from a classical theoretical<br />

framework, which is composed of the supply/demand - <strong>in</strong>frastructure/content matrix. However, when draw<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the elements which were identified <strong>in</strong> the country studies, it then uses a framework composed of four<br />

categories, i.e. country configuration, legacy situation, competition, and public policy, where the key criterion is<br />

the susceptibility of the factors affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband to be themselves <strong>in</strong>fluenced by broadband policy. This


Page 13 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

approach allows identify<strong>in</strong>g those areas where government action can really make a difference. This <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

is presented <strong>in</strong> section 9 on “How to achieve broadband for all” identify<strong>in</strong>g those “Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

broadband development” and potential “Inhibitors” of broadband development.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong> section 10 on “Broadband Applications and User Needs” a start is made of identify<strong>in</strong>g reasons why<br />

end users should benefit from broadband applications and to which extent broadband applications are already<br />

available or may be expected <strong>in</strong> the future. This section also identifies threats to usability measures that can be<br />

taken to ensure this usability.<br />

All the <strong>in</strong>formation presented <strong>in</strong> this deliverable will further feed <strong>in</strong>to the development of some general<br />

roadmapp<strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong> the rema<strong>in</strong>der of the BREAD-project. This bottom-up approach for identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

roadblocks and roadmaps from technological po<strong>in</strong>t of view, the <strong>in</strong>formation derived from the country studies<br />

will be comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a top-down approach followed by a “Broadband Th<strong>in</strong>k Tank” group. The activities of this<br />

“Th<strong>in</strong>k Tank”, were <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of July 2005 and discuss a broad range of matters and areas<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the “broadband for all”-concept, but with a high-level approach encompass<strong>in</strong>g all the multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

aspects of the concept. The <strong>in</strong>formation of this “Broadband Th<strong>in</strong>k Tank” will be summarized and<br />

added to this deliverable and presented at different occasions, as e.g. at the Broadband Europe event (December<br />

2005).


5. Related projects and standardisation<br />

Page 14 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The construction of a broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> Europe is part of the network evolution happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all<br />

directions and creat<strong>in</strong>g different k<strong>in</strong>ds of technologies to address user requirements and develop<strong>in</strong>g appropriate<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess cases <strong>in</strong> the competitive global communication area. In this development standards and the<br />

standardization process are important components as they are serv<strong>in</strong>g as a foundation for <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>teroperability of different networks, products and services that are key elements <strong>in</strong> realization of broadband<br />

based communication. As part of the development the concept of standards and process of standardization are<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g from an ‘old regime’ based on national sovereignty, jo<strong>in</strong>t provision and <strong>in</strong>teroperability via standards<br />

to a ‘new regime based on liberalization, privatization and deregulation.<br />

In the old regime national sovereign states, usually represented by state monopolies met <strong>in</strong> organizations as ITU<br />

and CCITT to agree on standards that typically were enforced via the participat<strong>in</strong>g national entities as nationally<br />

rules that met at the borders. Interoperability was typically ensured via standardization of <strong>in</strong>terfaces, nationally<br />

based on a symbiosis between operators and equipment manufacturers.<br />

In the new regime the old organizations are transformed <strong>in</strong>to stakeholder for a and new organizations are<br />

created - broad as ETSI or more specialized one-issue organizations- where members discuss standards to be<br />

recommended (de facto). This is followed by a change <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teroperability mechanisms now characterized by<br />

a deepen<strong>in</strong>g of standardization based on end-to-end considerations, where the elements <strong>in</strong> focus are companies /<br />

technical systems and not national entities.<br />

There are different types of organizations, which are partly substitut<strong>in</strong>g to the legacy standard bodies:<br />

• some are created when temporary needs occur; examples of that is DAVIC (Digital Audio-Visual<br />

Council from 1993 till 1998), or DVB (Digital Video Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g, still well alive) created with the<br />

advent of digital video.<br />

• Some committees have reached stability and now are recognized as standard bodies <strong>in</strong> their area, like<br />

IETF, or IEEE.<br />

• Some Forum or organizations like PLC Forum, ECCA, CableLabs, DSL forum,WIMAX have specific<br />

objectives, and sometimes a broader scope then produc<strong>in</strong>g standards.<br />

This change <strong>in</strong> regime has created new dynamic possibilities, but also bottlenecks and barriers creat<strong>in</strong>g obstacles<br />

to the development of broadband<br />

The major advantages of such approach are:<br />

• to create a natural consensus between all the actors of the delivery cha<strong>in</strong>, and allow them all to<br />

contribute and defend their own <strong>in</strong>terest; this on one end facilitate the adoption and endorsement of the<br />

produced standards, and on the other end to create a dynamic process as everybody will have common<br />

objective to support and deploy the standard<br />

• to clarify the market situation: as operators are committ<strong>in</strong>g to the process, vendors can have a clearer<br />

view on their <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

• to allow a fast specification delivery process; once the specifications are agreed , there is no need,<br />

except sometimes a regulatory constra<strong>in</strong>t, to have the specification adopted officially<br />

• an additional de facto advantage is the openness of most the consortium to every actor, whereas<br />

classical legacy standard associations have sometimes strict rules which can prevent all <strong>in</strong>terested<br />

parties to contribute efficiently<br />

Major issues to solve are:<br />

• The potential proliferation of competitive committees on the same areas, lead<strong>in</strong>g to a general confusion<br />

and lead<strong>in</strong>g more to proprietary solutions rather then largely adopted standards. This has already<br />

occurred <strong>in</strong> practice <strong>in</strong> some areas where standard bodies like ETSI are ratify<strong>in</strong>g competitive standards<br />

address<strong>in</strong>g the same area.<br />

• Legacy standardization bodies have a solid experience of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and upgrad<strong>in</strong>g standards, and<br />

ensur<strong>in</strong>g practical <strong>in</strong>teroperability and conformance to the standard, therefore the transition between<br />

specification production and standard stabilization phase can be very difficult.<br />

• Some particular consortium <strong>in</strong>terest (geographical for example) can prevent specifications to reflect<br />

worldwide requirement, and therefore create an unbalanced situation


Page 15 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• Where committees like ETSI and ITU can have a global overview of the telecommunication landscape,<br />

and set-up a global strategy, the consortia or forum only have a part of the picture; at the time where<br />

convergence has to occur between the video, data and voice standardization worlds, this new de-facto<br />

organization is not ideal<br />

If we try to summarize, some major bottlenecks have to be solved <strong>in</strong> order to clarify and optimize the<br />

standardization landscape:<br />

• The new role the legacy standard bodies have to play has to be clarified; will their role reduce to<br />

ratify<strong>in</strong>g specifications produced elsewhere, like it occurs <strong>in</strong> some ETSI or ITU <strong>in</strong>stances? Or will they<br />

be able to federate the different actions undertaken by the different <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> the areas.<br />

• How should these bodies transform to reach these objectives; should the participation and work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rules be adapted to this new world?<br />

• As a major aspect of standardization will be convergence between video and data / voice worlds, on<br />

one end all the expertise required has to be concentrated <strong>in</strong> these bodies, and on the other end the<br />

objective have to reflect a consensus on market trends on a balanced way.<br />

• What is the new role of Europe, and European projects <strong>in</strong> standardization? How to federate the<br />

contributions of European projects towards standardization?<br />

The analyses of these bottlenecks and barriers are a key component <strong>in</strong> the future work of the project.


6. ICT convergence<br />

Page 16 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Convergence is a key concept <strong>in</strong> development of a broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Broadband networks become more<br />

economic viable, if the same network can be used for a wide range of purposes and thereby replace a number of<br />

different networks. In addition a broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure may be based on an exist<strong>in</strong>g dedicated network<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure, e.g. a cable TV network, which is upgraded to support other types of broadband services as well.<br />

On the other hand the availability of broadband access for a substantial number of customers will promote<br />

development of converg<strong>in</strong>g services. For <strong>in</strong>stance depends <strong>in</strong>teractive Internet TV on Internet connections with<br />

sufficient capacity to support on-l<strong>in</strong>e transmission of live pictures.<br />

Convergence is not only a technical challenge, but <strong>in</strong>volves technical as well as market and regulatory issues,<br />

which has to be addressed <strong>in</strong> order to facilitate the objective of broadband for all. Thus convergence <strong>in</strong>cludes at<br />

least five different dimensions:<br />

• Convergence of services – the same content are supplied at different platforms<br />

• Convergence of networks – different services supplied via the same network<br />

• Convergence of term<strong>in</strong>als – multifunctional term<strong>in</strong>als that can support different services (that might be<br />

supplied through different networks)<br />

• Convergence of markets – the same companies supply their products and services <strong>in</strong> different sectors<br />

• Convergence of regulation – the same regulator and the same set of rules apply <strong>in</strong> different sectors.<br />

These dimensions <strong>in</strong>clude both technical and economic aspects as well as regulatory aspects. The technical<br />

development is often seen as the driv<strong>in</strong>g force enabl<strong>in</strong>g convergence. Although the technology is important this<br />

is not entirely true. It was possible to supply the same content at different platforms before the digitalisation, but<br />

the technology developments has made this a lot easier. In many countries (e.g. <strong>in</strong> the US) broadcast and<br />

telecommunication have been regulated by the same regulatory authority long before convergence of<br />

broadcast<strong>in</strong>g and telecom technologies. On the other hand convergence <strong>in</strong> technologies does not per se lead to<br />

convergence <strong>in</strong> markets and <strong>in</strong> regulation. All of these five aspects of convergence will shape development of<br />

broadband networks and are described more <strong>in</strong> detail below.<br />

6.1 Convergence of services<br />

Convergence <strong>in</strong> services implies that the same content can be reached from different types of technical platforms<br />

(e.g. either through the Internet accessed via the telecom network or through a digital video broadcast (DVB)<br />

service delivered through a broadcast<strong>in</strong>g network). This will lead to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g competition between different<br />

platforms. Customers may, therefore, face a convergent market for various types of <strong>in</strong>formation services.<br />

Digitalisation of content is one of the major drivers of convergence. In the digital world, the same content can be<br />

transmitted across different networks, and different services can be offered based on the same content. The<br />

synergy achieved goes far beyond the electronic communication forms and <strong>in</strong>cludes among others the pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

press. However, <strong>in</strong> this context the most important content services to consider are: Internet based services,<br />

broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services and mobile content services.<br />

Capacity-per-user problems and problems associated with return paths <strong>in</strong> broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks will <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

the development of data services that will be available <strong>in</strong> the broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks. Examples of <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

services offered <strong>in</strong> broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks without us<strong>in</strong>g a return path <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Download of software: The broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks are mostly used <strong>in</strong> the daytime and even<strong>in</strong>g hours.<br />

The transmission capacity dur<strong>in</strong>g the night-time can be used to download, e.g., new versions of<br />

software to set-top boxes.<br />

• Download of newspapers: In a similar way, newspapers can be downloaded to set-top boxes.<br />

• Internet on TV: Access to the Internet <strong>in</strong> current TV communication networks is not possible because<br />

of capacity-per-user problems of digital TV networks. A partial solution can be to broadcast a limited<br />

version of Internet.<br />

TV and radio services offered on the Internet are examples of broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services provided on the Internet.<br />

Such services are often tak<strong>in</strong>g the advantage of the <strong>in</strong>teractive facilities of the Internet to provide access to<br />

archived radio and TV transmissions and other <strong>in</strong>teractive services.<br />

Mobile content services are develop<strong>in</strong>g along with <strong>in</strong>creased bandwidths for mobile services. Mobile services<br />

can provide the same content as delivered on the Internet or via broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks – for <strong>in</strong>stance on-l<strong>in</strong>e


Page 17 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

video of sport<strong>in</strong>g events. However, content will often need to be tailored accord<strong>in</strong>g to specific demands related<br />

to use of mobile term<strong>in</strong>als and limitations <strong>in</strong> bandwidth.<br />

Convergence of services presents new possibilities for end users and new market potentials for producers, but it<br />

also presents new regulatory problems that have to be solved. One of the problems is related to the provisions<br />

for public service <strong>in</strong> the broadcast area. Should such provisions be extended to the Internet web, or should<br />

convergence on the content level lead to an abolition of public service rules? Another issue relates to the<br />

extended access to different k<strong>in</strong>ds of illegal or harmful <strong>in</strong>formation, for <strong>in</strong>stance racist propaganda, which the<br />

Internet facilitates. What are the possibilities for countries to reta<strong>in</strong> control of this? Yet another problem is<br />

related to the provisions for media responsibility that exist today for pr<strong>in</strong>t and broadcast media but do not apply<br />

to Internet media.<br />

6.2 Convergence of networks<br />

Traditionally, different <strong>in</strong>frastructures have been used to transmit and deliver specific <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

communication services. Examples regularly mentioned <strong>in</strong> the literature <strong>in</strong>clude: dedicated telephony<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructures for transmission of Pla<strong>in</strong> Old Telephony Services (POTS) and broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks for cast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Pla<strong>in</strong> Old TV Services (POTVS). These <strong>in</strong>frastructures have been dimensioned and optimised to meet the<br />

specific requirements of their respective services.<br />

The technology of <strong>in</strong>formation and communication services has, however, been subject to radical changes<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 20-30 years. Technological developments have resulted <strong>in</strong> the emergence of new <strong>in</strong>frastructures<br />

and better <strong>in</strong>tegration of services across <strong>in</strong>frastructures ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to digitalisation.<br />

Integration and convergence occur at different speeds <strong>in</strong> different levels of the network. Core networks have<br />

other characteristics than access networks result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> different conditions for their levels of convergence.<br />

Convergence has developed more slowly <strong>in</strong> access networks than <strong>in</strong> backbone networks.<br />

Telecom networks and broadcast networks differ <strong>in</strong> capacity offered, switch<strong>in</strong>g capabilities and availability of a<br />

return channel. Broadcast networks traditionally do not have the return path necessary for <strong>in</strong>teractive services.<br />

Digital broadcast networks, however, have a return path, either <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong> the network or us<strong>in</strong>g other<br />

networks.<br />

Telecom networks have been built to provide po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t services result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> network architectures where<br />

the network resources between the user and the first switch <strong>in</strong> the networks are not shared. This enables the<br />

service providers to offer customised services to <strong>in</strong>dividual users. However, the cost of operation and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of these networks is high and the <strong>in</strong>crease of capacity at end user sites is develop<strong>in</strong>g slowly,<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g it impossible <strong>in</strong> the short-term to <strong>in</strong>tegrate all k<strong>in</strong>ds of services. Developments <strong>in</strong> audio/video<br />

compression technology and new access technologies such as DSL make it possible to offer new services <strong>in</strong><br />

these networks.<br />

Broadcast networks connect users to distribution po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the network and share the network resources. The<br />

capacity allocated to a broadcast service is dimensioned to give a good technical quality of the service; however,<br />

the Capacity per User (CpU) is very low. These types of networks are not optimised for po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t services<br />

but are well-suited for services with common <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

Transmission of broadcast services over switched/routed networks is not necessarily an efficient way of utilis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

network resources, especially when ‘broadcast service’ denotes a service that is transmitted to many users and<br />

these ‘many users’ demand the service. All switches and routers <strong>in</strong> the network will then do a simple job of<br />

connect<strong>in</strong>g the same <strong>in</strong>put to many outputs, which is an <strong>in</strong>efficient way of us<strong>in</strong>g a switched/routed network.<br />

To a certa<strong>in</strong> degree, this is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the experiments <strong>in</strong> the UK <strong>in</strong> the early 1980s, where the cable companies<br />

implemented switched cable networks. The cable companies observed that the vast majority of users watched<br />

the same k<strong>in</strong>ds of programs for most of the time, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the function of the expensive switches to a wire<br />

connect<strong>in</strong>g these <strong>in</strong>puts to all outputs.<br />

A precondition for Internet TV (TV delivered over the Internet) becom<strong>in</strong>g comparable to traditional (digital) TV<br />

is an exponential <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> transmission capacity to end user sites. By us<strong>in</strong>g a simple assumption that two or<br />

three services must be available for a household (different family members must have the opportunity to watch<br />

different programs at the same time, and be able to record a program on VCR), the necessary capacity will be<br />

about<br />

40-60 Mbit/s <strong>in</strong> the case of HDTV and 8-12 Mbit/s <strong>in</strong> the case of SDTV.<br />

For some time to come, the broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks with their one-to-many structure will be the most optimal<br />

way of transmitt<strong>in</strong>g broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services to the vast majority of end users. However, when capacity is sufficient<br />

to provide broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services over the Internet other parameters like the way services are used can limit the


Page 18 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

provision of broadcast<strong>in</strong>g over Internet. If a service is used by the majority of people, it is a waste of resources<br />

to provide it through a switched/routed network, as it can easily be broadcast to all people us<strong>in</strong>g broadcast<br />

networks.<br />

One scenario might be that Web-TV (world-wide web pages delivered over broadcast TV) co-evolves with<br />

digital TV and exists as a complementary and competitive platform to other delivery networks. As a<br />

complementary platform, special types of services that will not be provided on other platforms can be provided<br />

on the Internet. As a competitive platform, special narrowcast types of services provided on cable and satellite<br />

delivery networks could be provided on the Internet and compete with these <strong>in</strong>frastructures for some broadcast<br />

services.<br />

One of the major barriers for convergence relates to the transport and delivery part (i.e. the <strong>in</strong>frastructure part) of<br />

the value cha<strong>in</strong>. It has been shown that although digitalisation is a major parameter, it is still only one amongst<br />

several parameters that <strong>in</strong>fluence convergence at the <strong>in</strong>frastructure level. It is also important, to emphasise that<br />

the success or failure of convergence is not directly connected to the capability of one <strong>in</strong>frastructure to <strong>in</strong>tegrate<br />

all services.<br />

None of the <strong>in</strong>frastructures available can <strong>in</strong>tegrate all the services <strong>in</strong> their current state. While <strong>in</strong>tegration of the<br />

back-bone parts of the networks have had better conditions to evolve, <strong>in</strong>tegration of the last mile coverage has<br />

been shown to be dependent on many different parameters. However, some <strong>in</strong>frastructures have better potential<br />

to be upgraded to <strong>in</strong>tegrate more types of services. Cable TV networks are examples of this. On cable networks,<br />

it is possible to offer several broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services of acceptable quality and at the same time deliver Internet<br />

and basic telecom services. Also new LAN types of networks <strong>in</strong> residential areas (and different wireless<br />

solutions com<strong>in</strong>g onto the market) can provide acceptable performance levels. However, when upgrad<strong>in</strong>g cable<br />

TV networks and establish<strong>in</strong>g new networks large additional <strong>in</strong>vestments must be made, and it is often not<br />

economical to do so.<br />

One way of implement<strong>in</strong>g convergence and deliver<strong>in</strong>g ‘convergence services’ is to utilise the synergy between<br />

different networks and consequently to utilise the strength of different networks. In this way, different<br />

components of the same service can be transported over different networks. This organisation of heterogeneous<br />

networks can be totally seamless for the end-user and function like an <strong>in</strong>tegrated network.<br />

There are, therefore, choices to be made between a pure <strong>in</strong>tegration model and a heterogeneous network model.<br />

This choice depends partly on the characteristics of the types of communication <strong>in</strong> question and the<br />

characteristics of different k<strong>in</strong>ds of networks and partly on the history of network development <strong>in</strong> different<br />

countries. There is a certa<strong>in</strong> path dependency <strong>in</strong> the possible choices countries make, h<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g on the former<br />

history of network development. Convergence of networks implies a development where the same services will<br />

be offered through different types of networks (e.g. UMTS, FWA and copper-based or optical wired networks).<br />

6.3 Convergence of term<strong>in</strong>als<br />

Term<strong>in</strong>al convergence denotes the com<strong>in</strong>g together of consumer devices such as fixed and mobile phones, the<br />

television and the personal computer. Penetration of TV sets is much higher than PC term<strong>in</strong>als. TV sets are by<br />

far the most universal household communication term<strong>in</strong>al. Provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractive services, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Internet, on<br />

TV can potentially benefit especially the ‘<strong>in</strong>formation poor’ and thus reduce the ‘<strong>in</strong>formation gap’ <strong>in</strong> many<br />

countries. This is an important implication of convergence, as a major part of the population of many countries<br />

will only benefit from new broadband services of network economies if it can receive the Internet services on<br />

TV.<br />

The PC term<strong>in</strong>al is develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to a real competitor to the TV set as an access device to broadcast services.<br />

Additional low cost TV tuner cards are needed to be able to see traditional broadcast services on a PC. The PC is<br />

a well-designed medium for consumption of Internet services and is a good medium for convergence of a wide<br />

variety of services. But here also the way of use will be a vital parameter that determ<strong>in</strong>es the services for which<br />

the PC term<strong>in</strong>al and TV set will be substitutes.<br />

The development <strong>in</strong> the past five years shows, however, that the direction of convergence is not only br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g<br />

together traditional services provided over different consumer term<strong>in</strong>als. There is also a trend towards the<br />

development of a variety of different access term<strong>in</strong>als for dedicated services and applications. The trend to<br />

service <strong>in</strong>tegration is be<strong>in</strong>g paralleled by a trend towards a new diversification.


6.4 Convergence of markets<br />

6.4.1 Vertical Integration<br />

Page 19 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Telecom services markets were generally highly vertically <strong>in</strong>tegrated up to about 1980. The telecom operators<br />

focused on delivery of end-to-end services and they either produced their own equipment or had a close<br />

relationship with national equipment suppliers. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1980s much of equipment production was divested<br />

from service operations. This was partly a consequence of the emerg<strong>in</strong>g liberalisation of the telecom sector. The<br />

equipment manufacturers wanted to sell their products to <strong>in</strong>cumbent operators as well as new entrants. Too<br />

strong l<strong>in</strong>ks with one operator would limit this potential and most manufacturers therefore benefited from a<br />

position as <strong>in</strong>dependent companies. However, many operators still ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>, substantial R&D departments,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> software and service development, <strong>in</strong> order to create a competitive edge through provision of the most<br />

advanced and <strong>in</strong>novative services. So, for <strong>in</strong>novation some <strong>in</strong>tegration between the production of technology<br />

and service production still persists.<br />

For terrestrial broadcast<strong>in</strong>g, equipment production and service production have <strong>in</strong> general been two separate<br />

activities. However, distribution and content production is highly <strong>in</strong>tegrated. For satellite and cable there is some<br />

vertical <strong>in</strong>tegration between content and distribution, as well as equipment production. The basic distribution by<br />

cable or satellite may be separated from content production, but most broadcasters act both as gatekeepers and<br />

producers of content although they also buy content from others.<br />

Many telecom operators are supply<strong>in</strong>g new content services over their networks. This can be seen as a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uation of the end-to-end philosophy that has dom<strong>in</strong>ated the telecom sector, but it is facilitated by new<br />

technical opportunities enabled through a wider penetration of broadband or semi-broadband facilities. In<br />

addition convergence with other media has drastically <strong>in</strong>creased the market opportunities for delivery of various<br />

sorts of content via the telecom network.<br />

6.4.2 Market convergence across <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

Convergence across <strong>in</strong>dustries can take place at all of the three horizontal levels: equipment/hardware,<br />

transport/software, and content/services. Each level is related to one of the technical dimensions of convergence:<br />

• Convergence <strong>in</strong> content production is related primarily to services convergence;<br />

• Convergence <strong>in</strong> distribution is related to network convergence;<br />

• Convergence <strong>in</strong> equipment production is related to term<strong>in</strong>al convergence.<br />

Convergence <strong>in</strong> equipment production is also related to a convergence between different network technologies,<br />

as equipment suppliers produce equipment for use both <strong>in</strong> production and distribution as well as consumption of<br />

content.<br />

6.4.3 Convergence <strong>in</strong> markets for content and services<br />

Convergence <strong>in</strong> markets for content and services does not imply that the different platforms will be used for<br />

provision of the same services – a degree of specialisation is likely to rema<strong>in</strong>. But the former boundaries<br />

between IT, telecom, broadcast<strong>in</strong>g and other mass media companies are go<strong>in</strong>g to be redef<strong>in</strong>ed and less visible.<br />

Even if a broadcast<strong>in</strong>g company chooses to rema<strong>in</strong> basically a broadcaster, it will be necessary to become visible<br />

on other platforms as well. New service <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g elements from IT, telecom, broadcast<strong>in</strong>g or other mass<br />

media will cont<strong>in</strong>uously be developed. These new services will not always be a source of creation of new<br />

companies but will contribute to the blurr<strong>in</strong>g of boundaries between the different <strong>in</strong>dustry sectors.<br />

Services convergence implies that content providers will become cross-sectional <strong>in</strong> the sense that they provide<br />

content to more than one sector. Most content providers are, however, still rooted <strong>in</strong> one sector and their new<br />

activities are ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the new sectors. This is seen most clearly <strong>in</strong> content provision to the Internet. Both<br />

newspapers and TV broadcasters have developed their own web-sites, where they exploit the economies of<br />

scope related to provision of the same content to different platforms.<br />

These activities may expand <strong>in</strong> such a way that this will lead to a convergence between providers of content to<br />

the Internet and either newspapers or broadcasters. But it is also possible that provision of news services to the<br />

Internet will develop <strong>in</strong>to separate entities that may be spun off as <strong>in</strong>dependent companies. Or the market will be<br />

taken over by completely new companies that have content provision for the Internet as their core bus<strong>in</strong>ess.


Page 20 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

An important barrier to the development of cross-sectional content providers is that it is not enough to provide<br />

the same content on different platforms. In order to rema<strong>in</strong> competitive, content must be designed <strong>in</strong> a way that<br />

takes the potentials and limitations of each platform <strong>in</strong>to consideration. As long as the technical capabilities vary<br />

across platforms and networks, there will always be scope for development of content designed for a particular<br />

platform.<br />

Another trend is the entry of telecom operators <strong>in</strong>to the broadcast<strong>in</strong>g sector. In Denmark, for <strong>in</strong>stance, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>cumbent operator TDC (formerly TeleDanmark) tried to establish its own TV channel <strong>in</strong> the mid 1990s;<br />

Telecom NZ has bought a stake <strong>in</strong> Rupert Murdoch’s Sky Network Television; and British Telecom has recently<br />

applied for a broadcast<strong>in</strong>g license.<br />

These examples deal both with horizontal and vertical <strong>in</strong>tegration. The philosophy is to ensure content to the<br />

networks. For example, BT (formerly British Telecom) seeks to distribute its broadcast<strong>in</strong>g service via its own<br />

broadband network. However it is not yet clear whether these attempts at convergence will be successful. BT<br />

has yet to make its broadcast service profitable.<br />

6.4.4 Convergence between distribut<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

The most important trend <strong>in</strong> convergence of distribution networks is between the telecom networks (which also<br />

provide the <strong>in</strong>frastructure for many IT services) and the broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks. The telecom networks are used<br />

for telephony as well as data, and now Internet services. Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services are still ma<strong>in</strong>ly distributed over<br />

separate networks, but some broadcast<strong>in</strong>g can also take place via the Internet. On the other hand, cable-TV<br />

networks can offer telecom services as well. In the UK, US and some other countries, cable operators have<br />

upgraded their cable networks to provide telephony, and cable modems are used to offer Internet access <strong>in</strong> many<br />

countries.<br />

In some countries, the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operators have from the very beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g been among the major cable-TV<br />

operators. This has tended to slow down convergence as telecom operators have been hesitant to <strong>in</strong>troduce new<br />

services <strong>in</strong> the cable network (such as cable-modem access to the Internet) that compete with services delivered<br />

<strong>in</strong> the telecom networks. In the US, through its acquisitions of lead<strong>in</strong>g cable operators TCI and MediaOne,<br />

AT&T became one of the two major cable-TV operators. S<strong>in</strong>ce its divestiture from its local operat<strong>in</strong>g companies<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1984 AT&T has lacked a direct network access to its customers. Through this acquisition it sought to rega<strong>in</strong><br />

direct access.<br />

Another trend is convergence between communication network operators and operators of other types of<br />

networks. In particular electricity companies have been active <strong>in</strong> roll<strong>in</strong>g out communication facilities <strong>in</strong><br />

conjunction with their power l<strong>in</strong>es. This has <strong>in</strong> many cases proven to be a cost effective way to provide fibre to<br />

the home (FTTH).<br />

6.4.5 Convergence between equipment manufactures<br />

Convergence <strong>in</strong> equipment production is not a new phenomenon, but is essential to achieve <strong>in</strong> particular<br />

term<strong>in</strong>al and network convergence. Many <strong>in</strong>dustrial corporations such as Philips and Siemens are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

many different <strong>in</strong>dustrial activities <strong>in</strong> most of the ICT and media sectors. The reasons for this relate primarily to<br />

strategy of conglomeration and the synergies between equipment production of different types of electronic<br />

equipment that existed before the digitalisation opportunities arose.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the past decade, convergence has been most visible <strong>in</strong> the IT and telecom sectors. The liberalisation of<br />

the telecom sector has made it possible for new entrants from IT hardware, software and consumer electronics to<br />

start up production of telecom equipment. At the same time, the technical convergence between IT and telecom<br />

equipment has made it economical to enter the telecom market. One prom<strong>in</strong>ent example is Cisco which supplies<br />

routers to private data networks as well as public telecom networks (<strong>in</strong> particular IP-networks).<br />

Convergence is not only a matter of utilisation of synergies <strong>in</strong> development and production. It is also a question<br />

of develop<strong>in</strong>g new types of equipment with features orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from different <strong>in</strong>dustries. This is clearly seen <strong>in</strong><br />

the development of term<strong>in</strong>als for digital TV. These term<strong>in</strong>als not only comb<strong>in</strong>e broadcast<strong>in</strong>g and IT technologies<br />

<strong>in</strong> their technical design. The services they provide are also a result of the convergence between the different<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries.


6.4.6 Divergence of markets<br />

Page 21 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

There is, however, also a trend towards divergence. Mobile communication, for <strong>in</strong>stance, has emerged as a new<br />

sector. The largest player on the market for mobile communications, Vodafone, is an <strong>in</strong>dependent company with<br />

a focus on mobile bus<strong>in</strong>esses. In addition, some of the fixed operators are divest<strong>in</strong>g their mobile activities. The<br />

explosion <strong>in</strong> mobile services around the world has been driven by <strong>in</strong>dependent competition made possible by the<br />

separation of mobile from fixed network operators, not its <strong>in</strong>tegration.<br />

Another divergence trend is the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g separation of supply of telecom services and operation of the physical<br />

network structure. Today a number of telecom operators base their operations <strong>in</strong> part on access to other<br />

operators’ networks through leas<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>terconnection agreements. In addition, a number of <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

providers have emerged. These are often public utility companies, which are <strong>in</strong> possession of their own telecom<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure but do not have any <strong>in</strong>tentions of enter<strong>in</strong>g the retail market for telecom services. The f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

crisis follow<strong>in</strong>g the UMTS auctions may be an additional factor prompt<strong>in</strong>g this development, as some of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>cumbent operators may be forced to sell off their <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> order to reduce their debt. Among others,<br />

BT has received offers for their <strong>in</strong>frastructure from at least two different consortia. Although these offers have<br />

been rejected, analysts observe that BT (as well as other debt burdened telecom operators such as KPN,<br />

Deutsche Telekom and France Telecom) must decide whether they want to be pure network operators or service<br />

providers <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />

The emergence of broadband networks, which <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple are able to provide all types of communication<br />

services previously provided through separate network <strong>in</strong>frastructures, does not seem imply creation of<br />

converged market actors present <strong>in</strong> all parts of the value cha<strong>in</strong> and deliver<strong>in</strong>g all types of services. But borders<br />

between exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries will be redef<strong>in</strong>ed and new bus<strong>in</strong>ess models will emerge. The ability of the <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

to adapt to this new environment will be crucial for development of broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure and applications.<br />

6.5 Convergence of regulation<br />

From a policy and regulatory perspective, convergence trends <strong>in</strong> the ICT and media areas raise a number of<br />

issues, which are relevant for development of broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructures. These issues <strong>in</strong>clude the general<br />

societal importance of a convergent broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure, access to networks and content, technology<br />

neutrality, problems of network and media concentration, and issues related content regulation. At the content<br />

level, there are a large number of issues to be resolved, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the question of whether all content areas can<br />

be treated <strong>in</strong> similar ways regard<strong>in</strong>g, for <strong>in</strong>stance, what it means for public service provisions <strong>in</strong> the broadcast<br />

area and what it means for media responsibility rules. Other questions deal with privacy protection, security,<br />

consumer protection, <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights, and illegal <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

6.5.1 General Societal Importance<br />

The general societal importance of convergence policies lies <strong>in</strong> the grow<strong>in</strong>g importance of ICT and media<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> terms of size of the <strong>in</strong>dustries themselves and the broader social implications. ICT elements are<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegral components of products and services <strong>in</strong> many sectors, and <strong>in</strong>formation and communication systems<br />

constitute <strong>in</strong>frastructures for many functions <strong>in</strong> society. Information and communication <strong>in</strong>frastructures are, for<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance, crucial <strong>in</strong> importance for the many services activities that play an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g role <strong>in</strong> social<br />

developments. Many countries have, therefore, devised <strong>in</strong>formation/network society visions and plans to take<br />

advantage of the potential applications of the new <strong>in</strong>formation and communication technologies and services,<br />

and many countries strive to establish the best possible economic and regulatory framework conditions for the<br />

development of a broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure and <strong>in</strong>novative applications.<br />

6.5.2 Access to Networks and Content<br />

Access to networks and content has become an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important issue. Many countries have some form of<br />

universal service rules <strong>in</strong> telecom, or are <strong>in</strong> the process of develop<strong>in</strong>g such rules. Many countries also have<br />

provisions for access to public service broadcast<strong>in</strong>g, even though <strong>in</strong> some countries there is an unfortunate<br />

conflation of public service and government propaganda broadcast<strong>in</strong>g. The policy question is whether and to<br />

what degree such access provisions should be extended to broadband networks and services, reflect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

developments relat<strong>in</strong>g to convergence, Internet, public <strong>in</strong>formation services, etc.<br />

The arguments <strong>in</strong> favour have centred on the issues of overcom<strong>in</strong>g the social divides and the economical and<br />

social advantages of a broad take-up of new technological possibilities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both democratic aspects and


Page 22 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dustrial growth potentials made possible by a broad diffusion. Arguments aga<strong>in</strong>st have been concerned<br />

primarily with creat<strong>in</strong>g a situation where the mass of users are forced to support the most advanced early<br />

adopters of new technologies, and the dangers and <strong>in</strong>efficiencies of subsidis<strong>in</strong>g technologies that are quickly<br />

made obsolete by new and more powerful technologies. However, some countries have gone beyond the mere<br />

provisions for universal service <strong>in</strong> basic telephony and there is generally open-m<strong>in</strong>dedness <strong>in</strong> relation to the<br />

possible <strong>in</strong>clusion of some sort of universal access provision, e.g. broadband access.<br />

6.5.3 Technology Neutral Regulation<br />

With respect to <strong>in</strong>formation and communication <strong>in</strong>frastructures, there is a general trend <strong>in</strong> policy discourse<br />

towards unit<strong>in</strong>g the regulation of the different <strong>in</strong>frastructures. Most countries have operated with different rules<br />

apply<strong>in</strong>g to fixed networks, mobile networks, and broadcast networks. But with the technical convergence<br />

developments and the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g possibilities for convey<strong>in</strong>g similar services over different networks, the<br />

foundation for differences <strong>in</strong> regulatory rules are be<strong>in</strong>g questioned. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is here that regulation should<br />

not favour use of a particular technology for provision of broadband services.<br />

Many countries, therefore, are seek<strong>in</strong>g to harmonise regulatory frameworks of different communications<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructures based on the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of technology neutrality. However, there are some problems attached to<br />

this approach. There are for <strong>in</strong>stance a number of special rules protect<strong>in</strong>g users of fixed telephony, which do not<br />

apply for similar services provided via the Internet. Also, the levels of competition <strong>in</strong> the different <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

areas may differ, for <strong>in</strong>stance, with greater competition <strong>in</strong> mobile services than <strong>in</strong> fixed.<br />

6.5.4 Network and media concentration<br />

The balanc<strong>in</strong>g of benefits and problems <strong>in</strong> relation to complementarities and market power is not a new issue.<br />

Public policies have been seek<strong>in</strong>g to strike such balances <strong>in</strong> many areas for a long time, and asymmetric<br />

regulation has been used to <strong>in</strong>crease competition between telecom operators, and <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom operators<br />

have been forbidden to offer cable TV services and have been requested to divest such activities. On the content<br />

side, many countries have for years had regulations limit<strong>in</strong>g cross media ownership. However, technological<br />

developments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g digitalisation of different media content, policy developments <strong>in</strong> the direction of<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g liberalisation and a less str<strong>in</strong>gent view on economic power concentration, and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternationalisation lead<strong>in</strong>g to larger corporations and political support for such tendencies, have altered the<br />

former balance po<strong>in</strong>ts between the benefits and problems associated with common ownership of broadcast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and telecom networks and with media concentration. Network competition needs to be ensured also on a<br />

converg<strong>in</strong>g market for broadband services and there is still a need to ensure plurality <strong>in</strong> media. There is today a<br />

widespread political trend toward loosen<strong>in</strong>g the restrictions on media concentration, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cross media<br />

ownership provisions, <strong>in</strong> order to take advantage of the new complementarities between media. However, the<br />

policy issue is still there and just a important as it ever was. New balances have to be struck <strong>in</strong> view of benefits<br />

and drawbacks <strong>in</strong> loosen<strong>in</strong>g and restructur<strong>in</strong>g regulations on media concentration.<br />

6.5.5 Converg<strong>in</strong>g Content Regulation and other content issues<br />

Adaptation of content regulation is crucial for development of broadband. In some areas for <strong>in</strong>stance<br />

broadcast<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g regulation may pose barriers towards development of converg<strong>in</strong>g services, and users may<br />

be reluctant to use services if consumer protection is <strong>in</strong>adequate. Both issues may hamper service development<br />

and demand, and delay roll-out of a broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

It is an open issue as to the extent regulation <strong>in</strong> the different content areas should converge. In the broadcast<br />

area, many countries have public service provisions of some k<strong>in</strong>d, though they may be very different from one<br />

another. Some broadcasters have responsibilities for provid<strong>in</strong>g services under certa<strong>in</strong> quality obligations but<br />

have, at the same time, a number of privileges <strong>in</strong> terms of, e.g., frequencies for terrestrial transmission. In other<br />

media areas, for <strong>in</strong>stance pr<strong>in</strong>t media, there are no such arrangements. And when content can be used across<br />

different <strong>in</strong>frastructure platforms, the question is what the implications will be for the specific public service<br />

provisions <strong>in</strong> the traditional broadcast<strong>in</strong>g area. It will surely be more difficult to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a central position for<br />

public service broadcasters, but will public service provisions necessarily disappear? Conversely, is it possible<br />

and desirable to extend public service provisions to the Internet web <strong>in</strong> the sense that public service broadcasters<br />

become obliged to develop web pages with a public service type of content?<br />

Another example of a similar question relates to the media responsibility rules for pr<strong>in</strong>t and electronic mass<br />

media. Authors/journalists and editors are <strong>in</strong> most countries responsible for what is pr<strong>in</strong>ted and broadcast.


Page 23 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

However, such rules seldom apply to <strong>in</strong>formation on the web, and the issue is whether it is possible and<br />

desirable to uphold such rules <strong>in</strong> a situation with a growth of <strong>in</strong>formation spread over the web, or whether it is<br />

possible and desirable to extend rules for content responsibility to new media platforms at all.<br />

Privacy protection takes on a new dimension <strong>in</strong> a converged Internet environment. Not only is it much easier to<br />

transmit files with personal <strong>in</strong>formation, it also becomes much easier to collect <strong>in</strong>formation about people, their<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests and buy<strong>in</strong>g habits by means of automatic registration. Security problems <strong>in</strong>volve both the security of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation transmitted on networks, i.e. that personal <strong>in</strong>formation is not disclosed or tampered with, for<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance, and the security of payments made on electronic networks. Consumer protection is also an important<br />

issue. When buy<strong>in</strong>g goods and services on networks, consumers must be protected aga<strong>in</strong>st shoddy quality<br />

products, late delivery or simple fraud. In some countries, there are actually stricter rules protect<strong>in</strong>g customers <strong>in</strong><br />

e-commerce than ord<strong>in</strong>ary commerce, but this does not apply to the great majority of countries where consumer<br />

protection is less, and there are certa<strong>in</strong>ly special problems <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>in</strong>ternational transactions.<br />

Intellectual property rights constitute another area where a converged Internet environment creates many new<br />

problems. The Internet provides new possibilities for spread<strong>in</strong>g cultural products – which is a great advantage.<br />

But for the holders of <strong>in</strong>tellectual property rights, these new possibilities create new problems with respect to<br />

protect<strong>in</strong>g their rights aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gements. F<strong>in</strong>ally, illegal <strong>in</strong>formation such as racist utterances and child porn<br />

can be spread much wider on the Internet, and the question is how to protect citizens aga<strong>in</strong>st such <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

and how to h<strong>in</strong>der people from spread<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ternational Internet context.<br />

These issues are not new. They have not been created by the development of convergence <strong>in</strong> the media and<br />

Internet areas. However, convergence and the Internet create a new environment <strong>in</strong> which these known issues<br />

acquire major new dimensions.<br />

It follows that convergence pose a number of issues of technical, economic and regulatory character, which<br />

needs to be taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g policies for promotion of broadband. Actors active on this<br />

market must realise that borders between various market segments are be<strong>in</strong>g redef<strong>in</strong>ed, and regulation must be<br />

reshape accord<strong>in</strong>g to changes <strong>in</strong> technology and market conditions <strong>in</strong> order to facilitate development of<br />

converg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructures and market.


7. Broadband technologies summary<br />

Page 24 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The objective of this chapter is to produce a summary of the different technologies and trends <strong>in</strong> the broadband<br />

for all areas, which considers different <strong>in</strong>puts:<br />

• The user, market and convergence trends described <strong>in</strong> the rest of the document<br />

• The technology state of the art and trends, which have been produced <strong>in</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ation with the other<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>IST</strong> project, as well as with external projects and <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

• The future <strong>in</strong>puts of a th<strong>in</strong>k tank <strong>in</strong>itiative which is set-up by the project.<br />

The methodology (shown below <strong>in</strong> Figure 1) adopted to build a coherent set of requirements and roadmaps <strong>in</strong><br />

the different areas of <strong>in</strong>terest follows an hybrid top-down / bottom-up approach.<br />

THINK<br />

TANK<br />

High level vision<br />

COMMON FIELDS<br />

IN ACCESS<br />

Gap analysis<br />

SOA <strong>in</strong> different<br />

technologies<br />

Implementation<br />

Roadmap<br />

Technology roadmap<br />

End to End topics<br />

BREAD GENERAL METHODOLOGY FOR ROADMAP BUILDING<br />

Figure 1: BREAD General methodology for Roadmap build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Some technical requirements are well known, and a complete framework (bold <strong>in</strong> Figure 1) can be derived<br />

A high level vision, and the pre-study of the state of the art analysis <strong>in</strong> the different technical doma<strong>in</strong> covered by<br />

“Broadband for All” will allow to ref<strong>in</strong>e the gap analysis and the technology roadmap derived.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial set of requirements which has been considered <strong>in</strong> the analysis is be<strong>in</strong>g segmented between the<br />

Application/Service Provider, the Network Operator, and the User (Figure 2).<br />

These can be translated <strong>in</strong> a set of technical requirements and trends, which are considered for the establishment<br />

of the gap analysis and roadmaps <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapters. The study of these technical requirements and trends<br />

require to segment the Broadband for all <strong>in</strong>to technical areas which are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.


A/SP<br />

•Access to user<br />

•Security<br />

•Session mobility<br />

•Content process<strong>in</strong>g/<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•Content packag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•Bill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•Configuration<br />

•Interface to service<br />

provider / network<br />

operator<br />

•Security<br />

•Bill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•QoS<br />

•Connectivity<br />

•Configuration<br />

•Content process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

•Multimedia applications<br />

(video/voice, data;<br />

broadcast + unicast)<br />

Page 25 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

user<br />

•Seamless access to<br />

content/applications/services<br />

•Preferences: QoS, security<br />

•End to end connectivity<br />

•Bill<strong>in</strong>g control / unique<br />

<strong>in</strong>terface<br />

•security<br />

•Nomadicity<br />

•Mobility<br />

•Content process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 2: The <strong>in</strong>itial set of requirements which has been considered <strong>in</strong> the analysis is be<strong>in</strong>g segmented between<br />

the Application/Service Provider, the Network Operator, and the User<br />

content<br />

signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

QoS, bill<strong>in</strong>g, security, authentication, …<br />

backbone<br />

Security, management and control<br />

metro<br />

IPV6, QoS,<br />

Common phys<br />

Common MACs<br />

Security<br />

Provision<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Bill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Interwork<strong>in</strong>g<br />

handover<br />

Security, signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mobile<br />

PLC<br />

DSL<br />

FTTx<br />

cable<br />

satellite<br />

wireless<br />

Figure 3: Segment<strong>in</strong>g the Broadband for all <strong>in</strong>to technical areas<br />

The breakdown between doma<strong>in</strong>s tries, to align to the separation between networks and actors of the broadband<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>: there is a natural separation between Home network, Access technologies, Metro Network on one end,<br />

and horizontal boundaries between the network operator, service / application providers, and content providers<br />

on the other end (the latter doma<strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g out of scope of the document).<br />

“Home network” has its own technical and bus<strong>in</strong>ess constra<strong>in</strong>ts and there are complex objectives <strong>in</strong> the area of<br />

“Home network” which are not fulfilled yet (the present version focuses more on the physical aspects, and<br />

wireless issues) such as:<br />

HAP<br />

Home


Page 26 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• High bit rate transport through heterogeneous clusters (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g wireless, cable, PLC) and<br />

<strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g between fixed and mobile clusters; handover between networks own<strong>in</strong>g to different<br />

operators<br />

• QoS framework <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>-home QoS management, and <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g with access network<br />

• DRM framework to support multiple providers, and local storage<br />

• Introduction of storage <strong>in</strong> the network<br />

• Coherent content discovery and selection framework<br />

“Access technologies” have all their own issues, common denom<strong>in</strong>ators be<strong>in</strong>g the need to <strong>in</strong>crease dramatically<br />

the average capacity and upstream per user with the <strong>in</strong>troduction of video <strong>in</strong> the services provided, and the<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease of user created content and Peer to Peer communication. Common trends appear between access<br />

technologies like decentralised architectures and common optical transport, new physical and MAC layers,<br />

common IP architectures (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g QoS, charg<strong>in</strong>g, device provision<strong>in</strong>g and security) between access<br />

technologies, and between fixed and mobile networks. The progressive <strong>in</strong>troduction of IPv6 <strong>in</strong> the access, then<br />

<strong>in</strong> the backbone is also developed.<br />

“Backbone and Metro” has similar trends with different constra<strong>in</strong>ts and roadmaps; the clear recent tendency is<br />

an evolution towards lower CAPEX & OPEX architectures with “multiple services centric” rather then “voice<br />

centric services”. A clear trend is a progressive evolution of SDH technology which rema<strong>in</strong>s clearly dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong><br />

that field. Trends developed further <strong>in</strong> this chapter are dynamic network<strong>in</strong>g, more efficient robust modulation<br />

and transport format, the reduction and implication of protocol stacks, multiprotocol support with GMPLS, and<br />

the progressive apparition of Ethernet <strong>in</strong> the Metro.<br />

Interfac<strong>in</strong>g between application, signall<strong>in</strong>g and network layers is a natural technical requirement; the openness<br />

of these <strong>in</strong>terfaces is driven by the trend of network operator, services operator and application provider be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ct.<br />

Interwork<strong>in</strong>g between networks becomes an important issue for ensur<strong>in</strong>g optimal end to end transmission which<br />

respects the <strong>in</strong>itial QoS and security, bill<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>itial users’ preferences sett<strong>in</strong>gs (e.g. preferred operator). This<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduces important additional constra<strong>in</strong>ts like:<br />

• Uniformity or QoS and signall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructures<br />

• Requirement for dynamic networks reconfigurability<br />

Requirement for a ubiquitous nomadic or mobile service to the user <strong>in</strong>troduces requirements for unique user<br />

identification, capabilities and preferences description; these <strong>in</strong>formation must be accessible on a standard way<br />

to allow term<strong>in</strong>al provision<strong>in</strong>g. The same k<strong>in</strong>ds of requirements exist for the content, i.e. unique ways to<br />

identify, locate and describe the content.<br />

On the content and applications layers, video is be<strong>in</strong>g aggregated with voice and data <strong>in</strong>to content offers, and<br />

there is a general need for unification between data, voice and video frameworks on the different topics of<br />

content description, security, content adaptation.<br />

Crucial topic is security, where the requirements are very dependant on the type of content and application, and<br />

where the legacy situations are very different; for example a news event and a telephone call will have<br />

significantly different protection requirements; moreover the legacy security systems have to deal with the<br />

particular environment (broadcast one way, or always on l<strong>in</strong>e). As security functionalities can have a major<br />

impact on service cost, and seamless access to use is required, a def<strong>in</strong>ed and <strong>in</strong>teroperable security and content<br />

protection framework, that can rely on lower layer security mechanisms (scrambl<strong>in</strong>g, user and term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

authentication) is needed.<br />

More generally there are 2 ma<strong>in</strong> requirements concern<strong>in</strong>g content and application delivery: a requirement for<br />

standard content encod<strong>in</strong>g, aggregation, description and adaptation mechanisms, and a second general<br />

requirement , driven by the separation between content, application and network providers, is the need for<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>terfaces between all the actors which allows to communicate the content description, session, security,<br />

QoS characteristics, so that the service provider and the network operator can fully exploit and transmit the<br />

content.<br />

The requirement to use term<strong>in</strong>als with different capabilities <strong>in</strong>troduces additional important constra<strong>in</strong>ts on<br />

content scalability; this scalability can be static (i.e. signalled at the start of an application between the end user<br />

term<strong>in</strong>al and the content provider), or dynamically, i.e. the content would have to support a vary<strong>in</strong>g QoS legacy<br />

environment, and adapt dynamically to this environment; this is particularly critical <strong>in</strong> multicast application<br />

where the content has to be consumed simultaneously by different k<strong>in</strong>d of term<strong>in</strong>als with different capabilities.<br />

Another important requirement is for uniformity of content cod<strong>in</strong>g and representation, so that ideally a term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

with limited capabilities can use any content, or that affordable transcod<strong>in</strong>g can be provided with<strong>in</strong> the network.


7.1 HOME NETWORK (wireless)<br />

7.1.1 Introduction<br />

Page 27 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Home networks are based on wired and wireless technologies (Figure 4). Applications are home control,<br />

communication, <strong>in</strong>fota<strong>in</strong>ment, and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment. The most challeng<strong>in</strong>g topic yet to be addressed <strong>in</strong> the Home<br />

Network environments is <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>teroperability, as well as the seamless provision of services,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent of the underly<strong>in</strong>g networks. Fixed Home Networks require cabl<strong>in</strong>g between the devices us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g wires like phone l<strong>in</strong>es, power l<strong>in</strong>es, etc.. Premium performance is obta<strong>in</strong>ed when us<strong>in</strong>g broadband<br />

media like twisted pair, coaxial wires or optical fibres. In contrast to wired networks, wireless systems are far<br />

easier to deploy, however, the performance of these systems strongly depends on the constra<strong>in</strong>ts which are given<br />

by the environmental conditions. Propagation loss, shadow<strong>in</strong>g, absorption, multipath propagation effects due to<br />

reflections at obstacles and Doppler spread may limit the maximum distance and transmission speed. From<br />

cordless phones to cellular handsets, consumers are now unwir<strong>in</strong>g their laptops, PDAs and other electronic<br />

gadgets with narrowband short-distance solutions such as Bluetooth and IEEE 802.xx / ETSI standards. Thus<br />

driv<strong>in</strong>g forces for ongo<strong>in</strong>g R&D activities are the cellular growth and the enterprise markets of wireless local<br />

area networks and wireless personal area networks (WLAN/WPAN).<br />

Home Network Technologies<br />

Cabled Wireless<br />

Copper Fibre Radio<br />

Infrared: kb/s...Mb/s<br />

Telephone l<strong>in</strong>e: 100 Mb/s (VDSL)<br />

Twisted pair: < 1 Gb/s<br />

Power l<strong>in</strong>e: < 2...14 Mb/s (shared)<br />

MM fibre: fibre:<br />

SI MMF:


7.1.2 Home Networks 1 : Technologies / Standardisation<br />

Page 28 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

High-speed Internet is spread<strong>in</strong>g. Homes that used to have little communication technology <strong>in</strong> the past now have<br />

multiple computers, peripherals like pr<strong>in</strong>ters and scanners, televisions, radios, stereos, DVD players, VCRs,<br />

cordless telephones, PDAs, and other electronic devices.<br />

Home networks l<strong>in</strong>k the many different electronic devices <strong>in</strong> a household by way of a local area network (LAN).<br />

The network can be po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t, such as connect<strong>in</strong>g one computer to another, or po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t where<br />

computers and other devices such as pr<strong>in</strong>ters, set-top boxes, and stereos are connected to each other and the<br />

Internet. There are many different applications for home network<strong>in</strong>g. They can be broken <strong>in</strong>to five categories:<br />

resource shar<strong>in</strong>g, communications, home controls, home schedul<strong>in</strong>g, and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment/<strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Resource Shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Home network<strong>in</strong>g allows all users <strong>in</strong> the household to access the Internet and other applications at the same<br />

time. In addition, files (not just data, but also audio and video depend<strong>in</strong>g on the speed of the network) can be<br />

swapped, and peripherals such as pr<strong>in</strong>ters and scanners can be shared. There is no longer the need to have more<br />

than one Internet access po<strong>in</strong>t, pr<strong>in</strong>ter, scanner, or <strong>in</strong> many cases, software packages.<br />

Communications<br />

Home network<strong>in</strong>g allows easier and more efficient communication between users with<strong>in</strong> the household and<br />

better communication management with outside communications. Phone, fax, and e-mail messages can be<br />

routed <strong>in</strong>telligently. Access to the Internet can be atta<strong>in</strong>ed at multiple places <strong>in</strong> the home with the use of<br />

term<strong>in</strong>als and Webpads.<br />

Home Controls<br />

Home network<strong>in</strong>g can allow controls with<strong>in</strong> the house, such as temperature and light<strong>in</strong>g, to be managed though<br />

the network and even remotely through the Internet. The network can also be used for home security monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with network cameras.<br />

Home Schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

A home network would allow families to keep one master schedule that could be updated from different access<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts with<strong>in</strong> the house and remotely through the Internet.<br />

Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment/Information<br />

Home networks enable a multiple of options for shar<strong>in</strong>g enterta<strong>in</strong>ment and <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the home. Networked<br />

multi-user games can be played as well as PC-hosted television games. Digital video network<strong>in</strong>g will allow<br />

households to route video from DBS and DVDs to different set-top boxes, PCs, and other visual display devices<br />

<strong>in</strong> the home. Stream<strong>in</strong>g media such as Internet radio can be sent to home stereos as well as PCs.<br />

The speed of home networks is also important to consider. Most home network<strong>in</strong>g solutions have speeds of at<br />

least 1 Mbps, which is enough for most everyday data transmission (but may not be enough for bandwidth<strong>in</strong>tensive<br />

applications such as full-motion video). With the development of high-speed Internet access and<br />

digital video and audio comes a need for faster networks. Several k<strong>in</strong>ds of home networks can operate at speeds<br />

of 10 Mbps and up. Digital video network<strong>in</strong>g, for example, requires fast data rates. DBS MPEG-2 video requires<br />

3 Mbps and DVD requires between 3 and 8 Mbps. HDTV requires more speed than current home networks have<br />

but that should change <strong>in</strong> the future, as home networks get faster and as technology develops and adapts to new<br />

Internet appliances and digital media.<br />

In general, the home network<strong>in</strong>g standards can be divided <strong>in</strong>to two large groups: <strong>in</strong>-home network<strong>in</strong>g standards,<br />

that provide <strong>in</strong>terconnectivity of devices <strong>in</strong>side the home, and home-access network standards, that provide<br />

external access and services to the home via networks like cable TV, broadcast TV, phone net and satellite.<br />

Additionally, there are the mobile-service networks that provide access from mobile term<strong>in</strong>als when the user is<br />

away from home. Currently there is no dom<strong>in</strong>ant wired home network<strong>in</strong>g standard, and networks are likely to be<br />

heterogeneous. A comprehensive compilation of the standards for multimedia network<strong>in</strong>g is given <strong>in</strong> the<br />

MEDIANET2 project.<br />

1 Future Home, http://dbs.cordis.lu/ <strong>IST</strong>-2000-28133<br />

2 MediaNet, http://www.ist-ipmedianet.org/home.html


7.1.2.1 Cabled Home Network<br />

Page 29 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Many <strong>in</strong>-home network<strong>in</strong>g standards require cabl<strong>in</strong>g between the devices. One option is to <strong>in</strong>stall new cabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the form of galvanic twisted-pair or coaxial wires, or optical fibres. The alternative is to use exist<strong>in</strong>g cabl<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

such as power-l<strong>in</strong>es and phone-l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g cabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the home is very convenient for end-users. For <strong>in</strong>-home network<strong>in</strong>g via the phone-l<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

HomePNA 3 has become the de-facto standard, provid<strong>in</strong>g up to 10 Mbit/s (240 Mbit/s is expected). For powerl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

network<strong>in</strong>g, low-bandwidth control us<strong>in</strong>g and (high) bandwidth data transfer us<strong>in</strong>g CEBus 4 and HomePlug 5<br />

are the most prom<strong>in</strong>ent ones, offer<strong>in</strong>g from 10 kbit/s up to 14 Mbit/s.<br />

New cabl<strong>in</strong>g requires an additional effort of <strong>in</strong>stallation, but has the advantage that premium-quality cabl<strong>in</strong>g can<br />

be chosen, dedicated to digital data-transport at high rates. The IEEE-1394a standard (also called Firewire and<br />

i.L<strong>in</strong>k) 6 def<strong>in</strong>es a serial bus that allows for data transfers up to 400 Mbit/s over a twisted-pair cable, and<br />

extension up to 3.2 Gbit/s us<strong>in</strong>g fibre is underway. Similarly, USB 7 def<strong>in</strong>es a serial bus that allows for data<br />

transfers up to 480 Mbit/s over a twisted-pair cable, but us<strong>in</strong>g a master-slave protocol <strong>in</strong>stead of the peer-to-peer<br />

protocol <strong>in</strong> IEEE-1394a. Both standards support hot plug-and-play and isochronous stream<strong>in</strong>g, via centralised<br />

media access control, which are of significant importance for consumer-electronics applications. The<br />

disadvantage is that this sets a limit to the cable lengths between devices. Another major player is the Ethernet,<br />

which has evolved via 10 Mbit/s Ethernet and 100 Mbit/s Fast Ethernet us<strong>in</strong>g twisted-pair cabl<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>to Gigabit<br />

Ethernet, provid<strong>in</strong>g 1 Gbit/s us<strong>in</strong>g twisted-pair cabl<strong>in</strong>g or fibre. Ethernet notably does not support isochronous<br />

stream<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce it lacks centralised medium-access control. Also it does not support device discovery (plug-andplay).<br />

It is, however, widely used, also because of the low cost.<br />

7.1.2.2 Wireless Home Network<br />

As opposed to wired networks, wireless systems are far easier to deploy. This is due to the smaller <strong>in</strong>stallation<br />

effort (no new wires), and due to a lower cost of the physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure. A wireless home network is<br />

configured with an access po<strong>in</strong>t that acts as a transmitter and a receiver connected to the wired network at a<br />

fixed location. The access po<strong>in</strong>t then transmits to end users who have wireless LAN adapters with either PC<br />

cards <strong>in</strong> notebooks, ISA or PCI cards <strong>in</strong> desktops, or fully-<strong>in</strong>tegrated devices. A wireless home network allows<br />

real-time <strong>in</strong>stant access to the network without the computer hav<strong>in</strong>g to be near a phone jack or power outlet.<br />

Installation is easy because there is no cable to pull as with conventional Ethernet. The devices do not have to be<br />

<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight but can be <strong>in</strong> different rooms or blocked by walls and other barriers. F<strong>in</strong>ally, all of these services<br />

are secure as they use encryption technologies.<br />

However, regulation by law and associated licens<strong>in</strong>g fees may seriously affect the actual cost of the wireless<br />

connection. Additionally, the governmental regulations vary widely throughout the world. Especially for the<br />

license-free spectrum-bands, the issue of signal <strong>in</strong>terference that limits usable bandwidth has to be solved. This<br />

is one of the reasons that there are so many wireless standards that it is becom<strong>in</strong>g difficult to keep track. From<br />

cordless phones to cellular handsets, consumers are now unwir<strong>in</strong>g their laptops, PDAs and other electronic<br />

gadgets with narrowband short-distance solutions such as Bluetooth and IEEE 802.xx / ETSI standards. Driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

forces for ongo<strong>in</strong>g R&D activities are the cellular growth and the enterprise WLAN market. In tables 2, 3 the<br />

wireless technologies and wireless standards are summarized.<br />

In some cases there exist an overlapp<strong>in</strong>g application between wireless home network<strong>in</strong>g, wireless access<br />

networks, and cellular systems. With<strong>in</strong> the <strong>IST</strong>-Future Home 8 project three wireless technologies have been<br />

addressed: IEEE-802.11 (WLAN), HiperLan2 and Bluetooth (WPAN). These have been selected for the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons:<br />

• the technologies are complement<strong>in</strong>g from the usage po<strong>in</strong>t of view;<br />

• they are <strong>in</strong> a different phase of maturity and can be also compared aga<strong>in</strong>st each other;<br />

• these different technologies provide the heterogeneous environment that can be used as a model of a<br />

future residential network;<br />

• they all can be used as substitutes of wired connections and therefore are suitable for an IP network<br />

environment.<br />

3<br />

HomePNA, http://www.homepna.com/, http://www.homepna.com/HPNA-DLINK-Kit.html-ssi,<br />

4<br />

CEBus, http://www.cebus.org/<br />

5<br />

HomePlug, http://www.homeplug.org<br />

6<br />

1394 Trade Association, http://www.1394ta.org<br />

7<br />

USB, http://www.usb.org<br />

8<br />

Future Home, http://dbs.cordis.lu/ <strong>IST</strong>-2000-28133


Page 30 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In this chapter on Home Networks additionally cellular and cordless systems have been <strong>in</strong>tegrated, because the<br />

largest and most noticeable part of the telecommunications bus<strong>in</strong>ess is telephony. The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal wireless<br />

component of telephony is mobile (i.e., cellular) telephony. In recent years the development of 3G thirdgeneration<br />

cellular i.e. IMT2000 and other wireless technologies have been key issues, like wireless<br />

piconetwork<strong>in</strong>g (Bluetooth), personal area network (WPAN) systems, and local area networks (WLAN).<br />

However, wireless metropolitan area network (WMAN) systems (IEEE 802.16 standards, called WiMAX**<br />

systems) are described <strong>in</strong> the chapter on Wireless Access.<br />

Wireless<br />

Metropolitan Area<br />

Network, WMAN<br />

DAB<br />

DVBT<br />

ETSI HiperMAN<br />

ETSI HiperACCESS<br />

IEEE 802.16<br />

Cordless<br />

Systems<br />

DECT<br />

Cellular mobile<br />

radio<br />

2G GSM<br />

3G IMT2000<br />

Wi-Fi*: Wireless Fidelity<br />

WiMAX**: Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access<br />

Table 1: Wireless technologies<br />

Wireless Local Area<br />

Network,<br />

WLAN<br />

ETSI HiperLAN<br />

MMAC<br />

IEEE 802.11<br />

Wireless Personal<br />

Area Network,<br />

WPAN<br />

HomeRF<br />

IEEE 802.15<br />

UWB<br />

Bluetooth<br />

ZigBee<br />

Area IEEE ETSI Forum/Alliance<br />

WAN 802.20 3GPP, EDGE<br />

LAN 802.11 HiperLAN Wi-Fi*<br />

MAN 802.16 HiperMAN, HiperACCESS WiMAX**<br />

PAN 802.15 HiperPAN WiMedia<br />

Table 2: Global wireless standards<br />

Due to page constra<strong>in</strong>ts the reader is referred, for more technical details, to Annex 2.


7.1.3 Issues and Trends / Gap analysis<br />

7.1.3.1 Technical trends<br />

Page 31 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.1.3.1.1 Cabled Home Network<br />

While the optical fibre based 10 Gigabit Ethernet is runn<strong>in</strong>g, the copper cable based 10 Gigabit Ethernet will<br />

come: In September 2004 IEEE has completed its 10GBASE-T draft (802.3an Draft 1.0), which will be accepted<br />

most probably <strong>in</strong> mid 2006. The copper cable based 10 Gbit/s Ethernet is expected to considerably drop the<br />

costs of the <strong>in</strong>terface compared to the optical fibre based version. Distances of 15m will be supported.<br />

7.1.3.1.2 Wireless Home Network<br />

In the UMTS cellular network HSDPA (High Speed Downl<strong>in</strong>k Packet Access) and HSUPA (High Speed Upl<strong>in</strong>k<br />

Packet Access) are the most recent enhancements. While HSDPA has been standardized <strong>in</strong> 3GPP Release 5,<br />

HSUPA is not yet fixed.<br />

HSDPA is a packet-based data service <strong>in</strong> the W-CDMA downl<strong>in</strong>k with data transmission up to 8-10 Mbps over<br />

a 5MHz bandwidth. HSDPA implementations <strong>in</strong>cludes Adaptive Modulation and Cod<strong>in</strong>g up to 16QAM, Hybrid<br />

Automatic Request (HARQ), fast cell search, and advanced receiver design. Multiple-Input Multiple-Output<br />

(MIMO) systems are the work item <strong>in</strong> Release 6 specifications, which will support even higher data transmission<br />

rates up to 20 Mbps.<br />

HSDPA is likely to arrive <strong>in</strong> Asia <strong>in</strong> 2005, <strong>in</strong> phones, handhelds, and PC cards. It will arrive <strong>in</strong> Europe and the<br />

U.S. soon after.<br />

In January 2004 IEEE announced that it will develop a new standard IEEE 802.11n for wide-area wireless<br />

networks. The real speed would be 100 Mbit/s (even 250 Mbit/s <strong>in</strong> PHY level). As projected, 802.11n will also<br />

offer a better operat<strong>in</strong>g distance than current networks. The standardization progress is expected to be completed<br />

by the end of 2006. IEEE 802.11n builds upon previous 802.11 standards by add<strong>in</strong>g MIMO (multiple-<strong>in</strong>put<br />

multiple-output). The additional transmitter and receiver antennas allow for <strong>in</strong>creased data throughput through<br />

spatial multiplex<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>creased range by exploit<strong>in</strong>g the spatial diversity through cod<strong>in</strong>g schemes like<br />

Alamouti cod<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

7.1.3.2 First gap analysis<br />

In the area of wireless communication we see the follow<strong>in</strong>g items, which have to be tackled:<br />

• Mobile networks / high capacity radio <strong>in</strong>terface<br />

- Improv<strong>in</strong>g spectral efficiency of the radio l<strong>in</strong>k by multi-antenna- (MIMO-) and adaptive signal<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g techniques<br />

- MIMO algorithms and protocols for high mobility<br />

- Scalable PHY layer and protocol stack design up to 1 GBit/s<br />

- Smart schedul<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- Cross layer design<br />

- Interference coord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

- software radio<br />

• Ad hoc networks<br />

• Meshed and multi-hop networks<br />

• Sensor networks


7.1.4 Home Networks Roadmap<br />

Page 32 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The wired home network technology offers presently data rates up to 1GBit/s (Figure 5) which seems to be<br />

sufficient for the most applications.<br />

wired<br />

Ethernet 10Mb/s, 100Mb/s, 1Gb/s<br />

Firewire (iL<strong>in</strong>k) 100, 200, 400, 800Mb/s<br />

USB, 1.5, 12, and 480 Mb/s<br />

CEBUS, Home Plug


Figure 6: Wireless technology roadmap<br />

Page 33 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2


7.2 ACCESS NETWORK<br />

7.2.1 Power L<strong>in</strong>e Communications<br />

7.2.1.1 Introduction<br />

Page 34 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Europe is deliver<strong>in</strong>g today electricity for all, so that all citizens can harness the richness of electronic appliances<br />

to improve the quality life. The next phase of comfort is the provision of universal Internet services. To this<br />

end, the electricity distribution network could be used.<br />

The use of the power grid has been the subject of research over a number of years for provision<strong>in</strong>g the telecom<br />

services, but so far have not showed the expected success: The compliance to all regulatory requirements (low<br />

electro-magnetic radiations limits), data rate and cost related features.<br />

This market growth of worldwide demand for broadband services is partially met <strong>in</strong> the 42 most developed<br />

countries of the world. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 150 countries account for only 16% of telephone l<strong>in</strong>es and 10% of<br />

Internet users.<br />

The emerg<strong>in</strong>g countries would have an urgent need for PLC technology due the low phone and <strong>in</strong>ternet<br />

penetration and the fact that telecommunication companies should make a great <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

where the electricity companies already have their own proprietary electricity grid.<br />

Deregulation is another key factor. Power utilities are look<strong>in</strong>g for ways to become more competitive and to<br />

expand their bus<strong>in</strong>ess. PLC is for them a significant opportunity to <strong>in</strong>crease their revenues through the<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of new services such as Internet, telephony and security.<br />

7.2.1.2 State of the Art/ Exist<strong>in</strong>g Technologies<br />

PLC uses the low voltage (230 /400 V) ma<strong>in</strong>s network for data transmission purposes. The two application<br />

fields for the PLC technology are<br />

• access networks and<br />

• customer premises or home networks.<br />

Figure 7 shows a simplified PLC access and home network. The access (outdoor) part of the network goes from<br />

the service node <strong>in</strong>terface (SNI) up to the user node <strong>in</strong>terface (UNI). The PLC l<strong>in</strong>e term<strong>in</strong>ation equipment (PLC<br />

LT) is usually collocated with the transformer which is the start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t of the low voltage power l<strong>in</strong>e network<br />

(PLN) go<strong>in</strong>g up to the demarcation between the utility owned outdoor (access) PLN and the <strong>in</strong>-house PLN. The<br />

access PLN has a reach of up to several 100 meters and covers up to a few 100 households.<br />

Power L<strong>in</strong>e Communication (PLC) has been around s<strong>in</strong>ce many decades. The use of the power grid for data<br />

communications was first employed <strong>in</strong> the so-called CENELEC band. The achievable data rates have been low,<br />

but sufficient for many remote control applications.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce a few years, high data rate communications are offered <strong>in</strong> the HF frequency band (from 1.8 MHz to 30<br />

MHz). The data rates of the PLC equipment on the market range from 2 Mbps to 45 Mbps. Higher data rates to<br />

up to 200 Mbps have been announced recently.<br />

The basic problems encountered dur<strong>in</strong>g the deployment of these PLC equipment, are:<br />

• electro-magnetic radiations,<br />

• <strong>in</strong>terferences <strong>in</strong> the frequency bands allocated to other users and<br />

• high costs.<br />

The market for broadband communications is grow<strong>in</strong>g and broadband over power l<strong>in</strong>es has the promise to offer<br />

low cost broadband communications over the ubiquitous power grid. The technology has a big market potential<br />

and a PLC technology solv<strong>in</strong>g the open issues will undoubtedly allow the realization of “Broadband for All”.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage of PLC over the other broadband technologies is that no extra cables are required as <strong>in</strong><br />

every build<strong>in</strong>g, be it offices, apartments or houses, the electricity distribution is already <strong>in</strong>stalled


SNI<br />

(Optical)<br />

Core<br />

Network<br />

PLC LT<br />

Outdoor<br />

Medium Voltage<br />

Power L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Network<br />

C<br />

Transformer<br />

Station<br />

Power L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Coupler<br />

Low Voltage (230 V)<br />

Power L<strong>in</strong>e Network<br />

C<br />

Meter<br />

C<br />

Page 35 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

PLC NIC<br />

PLC Modem<br />

PLC NT<br />

Gateway<br />

Inhouse<br />

Inhouse<br />

Power L<strong>in</strong>e Network<br />

Figure 7: PLC access and home network<br />

7.2.1.2.1 Characteristics of PLC<br />

Characteristics of the transmission medium and achievable bit-rates<br />

At first glance the ubiquitous power l<strong>in</strong>e network seems to be an excellent <strong>in</strong>stalled base for an access network.<br />

Particularly attractive is the fact that practically each house offers an <strong>in</strong> house power l<strong>in</strong>e network which covers<br />

perfectly all rooms.<br />

However, the typical access and <strong>in</strong>-house PLN is a very bad transmission medium for RF signals. The PLN is<br />

hampered by a bad and time variable frequency response, a high and unpredictable noise level, and high<br />

radiation.<br />

Lots of taps with bad and time variant l<strong>in</strong>e term<strong>in</strong>ations produce a complex and time variant channel transfer<br />

function with lots of notches and peaks <strong>in</strong> the frequency doma<strong>in</strong> and reflections <strong>in</strong> the time doma<strong>in</strong> respectively.<br />

There are many noise sources of very different nature.<br />

• Electromechanical noise sources as brush motors and switches produce predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong>tensive burst<br />

noise.<br />

• Dimmers and switch<strong>in</strong>g power supplies produce impulse noise with pulse frequencies related to the<br />

50/60 Hz power cycle or to the switch<strong>in</strong>g frequency respectively.<br />

• RF – <strong>in</strong>terference as e.g. caused by short wave transmitters may generate significant narrow band noise<br />

signals.<br />

UNI


Page 36 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

On the other hand strong radiation - or <strong>in</strong> other words the relatively high antenna ga<strong>in</strong> - of a PLN impose strict<br />

limitations on the power spectral density (PSD) of the broadband PLC transmitters <strong>in</strong> order to keep the<br />

disturb<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluences on radio services - operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the same frequency band - with<strong>in</strong> acceptable limits. As a<br />

consequence, the signal to noise ratios at the PLC receivers are reduced, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a relatively low spectral<br />

efficiency (bit-rate per Hz).<br />

In order to get an idea of the bit rate which can be transmitted over the outdoor (access) PLN, the maximum<br />

capacity of typical powerl<strong>in</strong>e reference channels <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g realistic <strong>in</strong>gress noise and us<strong>in</strong>g acceptable PSD<br />

masks have to be estimated. From 9 we take the results based on def<strong>in</strong>ed reference channel models, frequency<br />

bands, transmit power spectral densities (PSD) and a noise scenario, taken from typical channel measurements.<br />

Reference channel models<br />

• RC1 L<strong>in</strong>k as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 8a), length L ≈ 100m without branches, only few reflection po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

(attenuation ≈ 18 dB @ 10 MHz, relatively flat)<br />

• RC2 L<strong>in</strong>ear l<strong>in</strong>k as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 8b) with 6 branch<strong>in</strong>g cables of similar lengths, similar<br />

distances between branch<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts and total length L ≈ 110m (attenuation ≈ 40 dB @ 10 MHz,<br />

notches)<br />

• RC3 As RC2 but 8 branches and total length L ≈ 210m (attenuation ≈ 95dB @ 10 MHz, deep<br />

notches)<br />

• RC4 Power l<strong>in</strong>e access network with numerous branches, but without significant regular structure,<br />

as typically found <strong>in</strong> residential areas (attenuation ≈ 100 dB @ 7.5 MHz, no deep notches)<br />

7.2.1.2.2 Frequency bands<br />

Figure 8: Reference topologies<br />

• Band A: 0.5 to 20 MHz<br />

• Band B: 0.5 to 10 MHz (above 10 MHz reserved for <strong>in</strong>-house PLC, ETSI PLT)<br />

• Band C: C1 + C2 + C3<br />

- C1: 1.6 to 3.5 MHz<br />

- C2: 4.2 to 5.8 MHz<br />

- C3: 7.4 to 9.4 MHz<br />

(avoids the frequency bands of the ma<strong>in</strong> public and amateur radio services <strong>in</strong> Germany)<br />

Frequency Band<br />

Mbps A B C<br />

RC1 453.7 242.9 146.4<br />

RC2 272.7 164.2 98.7<br />

RC3 92.3 92.0 55.5<br />

RC4 45.4 45.4 26.9<br />

Table 3: Theoretical channel Capacity (Transmit PSD = - 53 dB (V 2 /Hz)) 9<br />

9 P. J. Langfeld, "The Capacity of typical Powerl<strong>in</strong>e Reference Channels and Strategies for System Design", Institute of Industrial<br />

Information Systems, University of Karlsruhe, Germany


Page 37 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

As an example, for the frequency band B the theoretically achievable bit-rate lies <strong>in</strong> the area between 45 and 240<br />

Mbps, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the power l<strong>in</strong>e network. The capacity figures <strong>in</strong> Table 3 are rather too optimistic because<br />

the transmit PSD of –53 dB (V 2 /Hz) might be rather higher than the value which probably will be fixed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al regulations for Europe. The estimated capacity is the total available once for the aggregated upstream plus<br />

downstream traffic produced and consumed by all the users sitt<strong>in</strong>g on the same PLN.<br />

The available capacity per user may be significantly smaller than this estimated total capacity, particularly if<br />

many users are onl<strong>in</strong>e and active simultaneously.<br />

7.2.1.2.3 Modulation schemes and protocols<br />

Bad channel transfer functions and high noise levels are challenges for advanced modulation and cod<strong>in</strong>g<br />

schemes which can be realised by complex digital signal process<strong>in</strong>g. For data communications, the power l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

network acts as a shared transmission medium which calls for a multiple access protocol and security<br />

encryption. Each node of the PLC network has to be configured and monitored for the network management<br />

system. All the vital and support<strong>in</strong>g functions of a PLC system are realised <strong>in</strong> chipsets - available on the market<br />

– <strong>in</strong> conjunction with software packages. Standardisation will drive the volume of such chipsets up and as a<br />

consequence the prices down. Typical characteristics of state of the art PLC chipsets are as follows:<br />

• Application: access and <strong>in</strong>-house<br />

• Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (OFDM), like Discrete Multi Tone (DMT) for ADSL,<br />

with up to 1280 carriers<br />

• Configurable to operate <strong>in</strong> the whole frequency band for BB PLC (1.6 – 30 MHz)<br />

• Multiple modulation schemes of the carriers: (D)BPSK, (D)QPSK, etc.<br />

• Up to 36 Mbps symmetrical bit-rate<br />

• Forward Error Correction (FEC)<br />

• Security encryption (e.g. DES, 56-bit)<br />

• Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol, e.g. Master/Slave or CSMA/CA (Carrier Sense Multiple<br />

Access with Collision Avoidance)<br />

• Support<strong>in</strong>g different QoS priority classes<br />

• Support<strong>in</strong>g unicast, multicast and broadcast<br />

• Support<strong>in</strong>g of up to 254 nodes<br />

7.2.1.3 Socio Economic issues<br />

The digital divide issue is one of the major issue <strong>in</strong> the European Union policy issues and solv<strong>in</strong>g this problem is<br />

a challenge to Europe and to make the dream of ‘ Broadband for All’ a reality. PLC solution provides one such<br />

possibility, s<strong>in</strong>ce the powerl<strong>in</strong>e reaches all homes across Europe and the electricity provider companies have the<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> place. Once the problem of EMC, high bandwidth provision and standards are solved, PLC will<br />

have very potential to be well accepted access technology by the citizens. Europe has pioneered the PLC<br />

technology and the know-how is <strong>in</strong> place. However, the lack of agreed standards and agreements with other<br />

operators for seamless communication across the networks is still <strong>in</strong> wait<strong>in</strong>g. Once such problems are solved<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of e-services to reach all citizens can become reality and the quality of life can improve<br />

considerably with e-Govt, e-learn<strong>in</strong>g, e-health services as well as work at home k<strong>in</strong>d of environment with smart<br />

house concept will tend to bridge the gaps of demographical situations and the skills of citizens <strong>in</strong> all fields of<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess either related to culture, art, commerce etc... can be fully utilised and exploited, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g the economic<br />

progress to all regions of Europe.<br />

7.2.1.4 Support<strong>in</strong>g organisations, Standards<br />

Refer to annex for a detailed description; among the organisations, the ma<strong>in</strong> ones are PLC Forum<br />

(www.plcforum.org), the PUA (PLC Utility Alliance) <strong>in</strong> Europe, which are deal<strong>in</strong>g with regulatory, technology ,<br />

and bus<strong>in</strong>ess matters, and HomePlug PLC alliance <strong>in</strong> the US (www.homeplug.org), which is more concentrated<br />

on standards.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> standards are:<br />

• TS 101 867: Def<strong>in</strong>es the splitt<strong>in</strong>g of the HF spectrum for PLC <strong>in</strong> the access and home doma<strong>in</strong>s<br />

• TS 101896: PLT (Power L<strong>in</strong>e Telecommunications) reference network architecture<br />

• TR 102049: QoS for <strong>in</strong>-home TLP


Band Frequencies (kHz) Application<br />

A 9 to 95 Out of house transmission<br />

B 95 to 125 In house transmission<br />

Page 38 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

C 125 to 140 In house transmission based on a specific multiple access protocol<br />

D 140 to 148.5 In house transmission<br />

E From 150 Radio bands, …<br />

Table 4: CENELEC Bands for Data Transmission over 230/400 V Power L<strong>in</strong>e Networks<br />

(transmitter power ≤ 5 mW)<br />

7.2.1.4.1 Frequency allocations<br />

ETSI and CENELEC have partitioned the HF frequency band (from 1.8 MHz to 30 MHz) <strong>in</strong>to two parts:<br />

• from 1.8 MHz to 12 MHz is allocated for Access PLC<br />

• from 12 MHz to 30 MHz is allocated for In-House PLC<br />

7.2.1.4.2 <strong>Project</strong>s<br />

The 2 ma<strong>in</strong> European projects cover<strong>in</strong>g PLC are:<br />

• <strong>FP6</strong> project: OPERA: cover<strong>in</strong>g all the aspects of PLC<br />

• FP5 project: 6power: cover<strong>in</strong>g Ipv6, QoS & POWER l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tegration (concluded)<br />

More detailed description of these projects is given <strong>in</strong> Annex.<br />

7.2.1.5 Issues and trends<br />

There are some recent publications, which demonstrates that <strong>in</strong>herent problems can be solved by adopt<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

modulation technologies such as multi-carrier modulation (MCM) and of use digital filter banks (DFB) <strong>in</strong>stead<br />

of OFDM to obta<strong>in</strong> high level stop-band attenuation (larger than 100 dB) to ensure that the technology do not<br />

have a power leakage <strong>in</strong> the frequency bands allocated to other users of the HF band. This new technology, uses<br />

peer to peer communications <strong>in</strong>stead of the commonly used master-slave communications to keep the<br />

electromagnetic radiations as low as possible. The MAC (medium access control) allows ad hoc network<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

self-organization. The results of computer simulations have shown that this new technology can meet NB30<br />

requirements under normal operations. High data rates (up to 300 Mbps) both <strong>in</strong>teractive (IP services) and<br />

broadcast (DTV) services can be offered.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> PLC players (those that have known customers and whose technology has been proven <strong>in</strong> the field)<br />

are:<br />

• Ascom: It is based on a 2 Mbps GMSK technology. Ascom develops both the core technology and the<br />

equipment. The used frequency bands are compatible with European standards. However, Ascom is no<br />

more active <strong>in</strong> the commercial field.<br />

• DS2: 1280-carriers OFDM technology can provide up to 45 Mbps <strong>in</strong> a 10-MHz range. DS2 targets<br />

both access and home network<strong>in</strong>g markets. Its frequency allocation is compatible with European<br />

standards. They have announced a new generation of PLC equipment hav<strong>in</strong>g up to 200 Mb/s, but the<br />

technology is not yet proven <strong>in</strong> the field. DS2 equipment does not meet the CENELEC and NB30<br />

standards with respect to radiations and <strong>in</strong>terference.<br />

• Intellon: the HomePlug standard is based on their technology (84-carriers OFDM, 14 Mbps theoretical<br />

data rate, 6-8 Mbps actual data rate). Intellon is exclusively focused on the home network<strong>in</strong>g market<br />

(it’s technology does not support repeaters, which precludes it from be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> long-distance access<br />

scenarios). It’s <strong>in</strong>efficient frequency allocation (from 4 to 20 MHz) is <strong>in</strong>compatible with European<br />

standard regard<strong>in</strong>g access and <strong>in</strong>-home coexistence.<br />

• Itran: 2 Mbps CDMA technology. It is not compatible with European standard regard<strong>in</strong>g coexistence<br />

between access and <strong>in</strong>-home. Its ma<strong>in</strong> customer is the Israeli company Ma<strong>in</strong>net.


Page 39 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.2.1.5.1 Gap Analysis<br />

Most of the PLC equipment on the market relies on a master-slave communications. Thereby, the master has to<br />

reach all slaves <strong>in</strong> order to allow them to register and ask the master for transmission permission. The transmit<br />

power of the master has therefore be high enough to reach all the slaves. High transmit power leads to high EM<br />

radiations. There is also a mismatch between given topology of electric energy distribution and the used masterslave<br />

scheme. If an additional master is needed for scalability, the new master has to be synchronized to the<br />

master already <strong>in</strong> use, otherwise they are go<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>terfere with each other. The problems are: 1) high electromagnetic<br />

radiations (usually above the limits requested by the regulatory) and 2) no scalability (or difficult<br />

scalability).<br />

The hot debates today concern the radiation levels and frequency bands of PLC. In Europe data transmission<br />

over the so called “low voltage” (230V) power l<strong>in</strong>e network is regulated very restrictively by CENELEC<br />

(European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization). The CENELEC bands for data transmission over<br />

low voltage power l<strong>in</strong>e networks are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 3. For out-of-house (access) transmission the band A with a<br />

bandwidth of 90 kHz is available, which only allows low bit-rates. For broadband PLC the frequency band from<br />

1.6 to 30 MHz is required. This makes the short-wave-radio community step <strong>in</strong>, because they see traditional and<br />

important services sensitively disturbed by un<strong>in</strong>tentional, cumulated radiation from many PLC systems. The<br />

short-wave-radio community, which is represented by many organisations, want to achieve very low radiation<br />

field strength limits <strong>in</strong> the regulations for broadband PLC systems. This would br<strong>in</strong>g the signal-to-noise-ratio at<br />

the PLC receivers and consequently the bit-rates down. The technical arguments of the short-wave-radio<br />

community can’t be denied because short waves enable long distance radio services for many users (military,<br />

police, secret service, embassies, airl<strong>in</strong>es, maritime, public radio, radio amateurs, etc.) based on reflections at the<br />

ionosphere. The received signals are typically weak, therefore the noise level must be very low.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> order to be cost-competitive with other broadband technologies like xDSL, cable, VDSL, WiFi,<br />

WiMAX and FTTH, the PLC solution has to provide high data rates and be of reasonable complexity. To<br />

achieve high data rates, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) must be high enough to be able to use multilevel codes.<br />

This means that the path loss must be such to allow high SNR. Another way to achieve high data rates is to use<br />

larger frequency band. This is the reason why FCC has decided to allocate to BPL communications a frequency<br />

band from 1.8 MHz to 80 MHz.<br />

7.2.1.6 Roadmap<br />

PLC technology has long way to go and it is expected with ETSI and PLC forum work<strong>in</strong>g hand-<strong>in</strong>-hand <strong>in</strong><br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g the agreed standards will lead a way towards early deployment of competitive technology <strong>in</strong><br />

different countries of Europe. Once, the hurdles of EMC, and bandwidth provisions with QoS; and security<br />

functionalities are <strong>in</strong> built <strong>in</strong>to the PLC technology, the deployment can spread very fast across Europe and the<br />

globe. The potential of PLC and its exploitation by the European <strong>in</strong>dustries can be compared to the GSM<br />

technology, if successful both <strong>in</strong> political and technical levels.<br />

OPERA project is expected to provide solutions to the problems identified and next 10 years will be important<br />

time scale for PLC <strong>in</strong>dustries and service providers.


7.2.2 Cable<br />

7.2.2.1 Introduction<br />

Page 40 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Cable networks have so far been utilised mostly for broadcast TV applications <strong>in</strong> Europe, but high HFC network<br />

<strong>in</strong>stallation and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance cost make it hardly competitive with satellite if used for broadcast services only. A<br />

cable network is an ideal medium for converged services delivery as it can convey broadcast, multicast and<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle-cast services. Broadband access via cable has approximately a rough 40% world-wide market share, and<br />

has now the challenge to rema<strong>in</strong> a viable alternative to other access technologies.<br />

7.2.2.2 State of the art / current Technologies<br />

7.2.2.2.1 Cable networks current architecture<br />

The view below (Figure 9) summarises the architecture of a modern HFC (Hybrid Fibre Coaxial network).<br />

Many variants can exist but <strong>in</strong> general the architecture <strong>in</strong>cludes several levels:<br />

• A Ma<strong>in</strong> Head-end (Central Node) where all broadcast services are aggregated. The ma<strong>in</strong> HE feeds the<br />

secondary Nodes (or Local Nodes), generally through secured fiber optic l<strong>in</strong>ks.<br />

• The local nodes feed medium size cities or small regions; many variants like shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 9 can<br />

apply. The local node serves a number of coaxial areas via fiber l<strong>in</strong>ks us<strong>in</strong>g usually analogue<br />

transmission. The boundary node between fiber and each coaxial area is called a Fiber Node. The<br />

coaxial area size will determ<strong>in</strong>e the ultimate traffic capacity available per user.<br />

• The coaxial area architecture can be either a star network with different levels, or more commonly a<br />

tree and branch network; this part becomes critical when very high bit rates have to be conveyed<br />

Figure 9: Example of HFC architecture<br />

The HFC specific part of the network beg<strong>in</strong>s at the Local node (the MAN or WAN between the DN and the LNs<br />

not be<strong>in</strong>g specific to HFC); optical transport is usually analogue, transmitt<strong>in</strong>g transparently the upstream and<br />

downstream spectrum.


Page 41 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The RF spectrum allocation downstream and upstream are 88-860 MHz and 5-65 MHz respectively (many local<br />

variants exist), the downstream spectrum is occupied by analogue broadcast TV carriers and digital QAM 64 or<br />

QAM256 carries convey<strong>in</strong>g digital TV MPEG signal or data payload.<br />

The ultimate cell capacity (assum<strong>in</strong>g that digital switchover has occurred) can be up to 4 Gbps downstream, and<br />

200 Mbps upstream; this capacity can be shared between broadcast, unicast and multicast traffic. In practice,<br />

when tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the broadcast analogue channels, the unicast downstream available capacity is<br />

significantly lower (several hundreds of Mbps), as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 10.<br />

Figure 10<br />

These figures show that very high bit rate access is possible at the expense of segment<strong>in</strong>g the network <strong>in</strong>to small<br />

cells, which <strong>in</strong>troduces a series of technical challenges.<br />

In summary Cable access provides an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g alternative to XDSL, as it offers the same range of capacity,<br />

and allows <strong>in</strong> addition to deliver multicast / broadcast services; it provides an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g cost effective<br />

alternative to FTTH. The problem is to f<strong>in</strong>d good evolutionary scenarios for cable network <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

significantly their capacity, on an economical way.<br />

7.2.2.2.2 Current upstream physical and MAC layers:<br />

The standard of choice for upstream physical and MAC layer is DOCSIS (standardised <strong>in</strong> the USA by<br />

CableLabs) and its European variant, Eurodocsis, standardised <strong>in</strong> ETSI as EN 201 488.<br />

There are 3 versions of the standard: 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 (Table 5).<br />

Parameter (E)DOCSIS 1.0 (E)DOCSIS 1.1 (E)DOCSIS 2.0<br />

Channel width/downstream capcity 6-8 MHz/ 27-56 Mbps 6-8 MHz/ 27-56 Mbps 6-8 MHz/ 27-56 Mbps<br />

Channel width/upstream capacity 3.2MHz/ 10.24 Mbps 3.2 MHz/ 10.24 Mbps 6.4 MHz/ 30.72Mbps<br />

Per flow QoS support No yes Yes<br />

security BPI BPI+ BPI+<br />

Packet fragementation No Yes Yes<br />

Table 5: (E)DOCSIS standards<br />

Version 2.0, which has been designed to mitigate efficiently the plant disturbances uses both s<strong>in</strong>gle carrier<br />

TDMA and SCDMA access techniques, the maximum bit rate per RF carrier be<strong>in</strong>g 30 Mbps.<br />

As the Cable network is a shared medium, the MAC layer is a po<strong>in</strong>t to multipo<strong>in</strong>t type of MAC layer, where the<br />

subscribers are shar<strong>in</strong>g an upstream channel us<strong>in</strong>g ATDMA; the slot allocation is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the central<br />

station, called AN (Access Node), which is the <strong>in</strong>terface between the HFC network and the backbone.<br />

The standard is based on IP packet transmission, but IP packet fragmentation is possible to respect the jitter<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts of services like IP telephony, when mix<strong>in</strong>g data and voice services. Eurodocsis def<strong>in</strong>es also a per


Page 42 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

flow QoS description, which allows to support both an Intserv and diffserv type of architectures <strong>in</strong> the access<br />

network (a mapp<strong>in</strong>g between RSVP QoS parameters, and the MAC layer QoS parameters is def<strong>in</strong>ed).<br />

Multicast connection and mapp<strong>in</strong>g with IGMP are also described at the MAC level; furthermore the standard<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes layer 2 unicast and multicast encryption and authentication tools to ensure subscriber privacy, and<br />

prevent term<strong>in</strong>al clon<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Security is therefore supported both for unicast and multicast sessions.<br />

The requirement for evolv<strong>in</strong>g the standards are a higher capacity downstream (200 Mbps +) and upstream (100<br />

Mbps +), <strong>in</strong> order to accommodate video related services.<br />

7.2.2.2.3 IP architecture<br />

A complete IP architecture (Figure 11) is def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the access network for voice communication, and could be<br />

extended <strong>in</strong> general to multimedia services requir<strong>in</strong>g QoS.<br />

Signall<strong>in</strong>g is based on a centralised architecture and th<strong>in</strong> client model (MGCP), and mostly applicable to<br />

telephony services. 2 QoS models are def<strong>in</strong>ed: the most applicable one (called dynamic QoS) relies on Intserv,<br />

and def<strong>in</strong>e the access QoS architecture us<strong>in</strong>g RSVP, or more generally a per flow resource reservation. Another<br />

variant assumes a diffserv architecture. COPS is the protocol of choice for communication between the CMTS<br />

(Or Access Node) and the CMS for policy and authorisation purpose.<br />

Interdoma<strong>in</strong> signall<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>es SIP or H248 for signall<strong>in</strong>g between different doma<strong>in</strong>s; <strong>in</strong>terdoma<strong>in</strong> QoS is<br />

obviously not precisely def<strong>in</strong>ed yet, but some recommendations exist.<br />

This centralised architecture is well adapted to a telephony case, but not really scalable to multimedia.<br />

Figure 11: IP-architecture for cable networks


7.2.2.3 Socio Economic issues<br />

Page 43 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Marketwise, HFC is a major technology both for digital broadcast content delivery (with satellite and terrestrial),<br />

and for broadband access (with DSL).<br />

Some historical background is necessary to understand HFC networks situation and trends <strong>in</strong> Europe. Cable<br />

networks were deployed either by Private or mixed private-public operators (like <strong>in</strong> Belgium, Netherland, Spa<strong>in</strong>,<br />

France for some parts), or were own<strong>in</strong>g (eventually partly) to the public telecom operator (Germany,<br />

Switzerland, France <strong>in</strong> some parts, Portugal).<br />

HFC was used exclusively for broadcast<strong>in</strong>g until 1995, and the development of broadband access was slower as<br />

compared to other countries like USA and Canada for <strong>in</strong>stance. The follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons:<br />

• Public operators were not keen to promote a competitive technology on HFC as they had to sell the<br />

HFC networks<br />

• Some complicated situations like <strong>in</strong> Germany where the networks are divided <strong>in</strong> different levels with<br />

different owners<br />

• Many small size operators, mak<strong>in</strong>g broadband access and IP telephony difficult to develop<br />

In particular HFC network bi-directionalisation was not pushed <strong>in</strong> some countries, where still large <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />

are necessary to make the HFC plant ready for 2 ways communications [figure IDATE <strong>in</strong> “how to achieve<br />

broadband for all”]. It is particularly the case of Germany where the cable market potential is high, but only a<br />

small percentage of connections are ready for broadband.<br />

The factors favour<strong>in</strong>g the developments of broadband are ma<strong>in</strong>ly to create operator hav<strong>in</strong>g the capacity to make<br />

the necessary <strong>in</strong>vestments to <strong>in</strong>crease the network capacity and operate the new services:<br />

• Solve the cable operators fragmentation by:<br />

- creat<strong>in</strong>g a common unique operators for the service (like Telenet <strong>in</strong> Belgium), whereas the cable<br />

network operators are rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

- Hav<strong>in</strong>g a local and <strong>in</strong>ternational concentration of operators merg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to pan-European operators<br />

• The ownership and operation of a dedicated backbone, which can become a critical factor to master the<br />

price of communications<br />

• Independency from the <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom operator<br />

The second major issue for cable is to provide nomadic and mobile access to the subscriber as a complementary<br />

services; therefore cooperation/ competition with mobile networks will be a trend for the future.<br />

Some regulatory threats are the obligation of open access, which can pose technical economical issues.<br />

The development of cable is ma<strong>in</strong>ly driven, follow<strong>in</strong>g and tak<strong>in</strong>g advantage of the economy of scale of the US<br />

cable broadband market.<br />

The advantages <strong>in</strong>herent to HFC are its capacity, and capability to transport simultaneously broadcast and<br />

broadband services.<br />

Besides XDSL and cooperative networks (XDSL-DVB-T or XDSL/satellite networks), WIMAX will probably<br />

be the ma<strong>in</strong> competitor to HFC, as WIMAX technology has a def<strong>in</strong>itive cost advantage especially <strong>in</strong> rural and<br />

sub-urban areas.<br />

The challenge of WIMAX is the spectrum available, and also the necessary <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>vestment to deploy the<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> a highly competitive environment.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> challenge of HFC is to provide the same capacity as its 2 competitors at a competitive cost by solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the technology issues described <strong>in</strong> this document.<br />

7.2.2.4 Issues and trends / gap analysis<br />

The first priority issue is to offer more bandwidth per customers <strong>in</strong> a more efficient and cost effective way, and<br />

to <strong>in</strong>tegrate video services <strong>in</strong> the broadband offer; this can be translated <strong>in</strong> a set of trends / issues:<br />

• Increase downstream capacity per subscriber, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both network capacity and term<strong>in</strong>al capacity<br />

• Increase upstream network capacity, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g more efficient use of the upstream<br />

• Allow flexible shar<strong>in</strong>g ratio between upstream and downstream traffic<br />

• Load balanc<strong>in</strong>g between upstream and downstream capacity<br />

• Evolve to a full IP architecture <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g video services, and support<strong>in</strong>g QoS, bill<strong>in</strong>g, security.<br />

• Extend the framework to home network


Page 44 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Another important issue of cable network is the <strong>in</strong>terconnection of HFC networks <strong>in</strong> hybrid <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

Connection with a broadcast media is not required, as HFC network supports broadcast services, but the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terconnection of HFC the follow<strong>in</strong>g networks is required:<br />

• Mobile networks to provide subscriber and session mobility between the cable and the mobile network<br />

• Wireless networks like WIMAX to cover non-cabled areas<br />

Different alternatives to fulfil the requirements of future HFC networks are developed <strong>in</strong> annex 2:<br />

On the <strong>in</strong>frastructure side, different paradigms can be developed to <strong>in</strong>crease the network capacity, the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

ones be<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• Keep analogue transport <strong>in</strong> the fibre part of the network and a centralised architecture (routers are<br />

placed <strong>in</strong> a Local Node)<br />

• Upgrade the fibre network to digital transport <strong>in</strong> a decentralised architecture where the routers (CMTS)<br />

are serv<strong>in</strong>g small subscriber areas (50-200)<br />

• Hybrid <strong>in</strong>frastructure with analogue transport for broadcast services and digital transport for <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

traffic.<br />

Higher capacity downstream and upstream will require the def<strong>in</strong>ition of more optimised physical and MAC layer<br />

standards adapted to these architectures:<br />

• Much higher peak bit rate downstream (> 200 Mbps) and upstream (> 100 Mbps)<br />

• Capacity to manage efficiently the resources between video, voice and data traffic<br />

• Load balanc<strong>in</strong>g between downstream and upstream channels<br />

On the security and content protection aspects, converged VOIP and data frameworks have been def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with<strong>in</strong> Packet Cable and Packet Cable Multimedia, allow<strong>in</strong>g significant cots sav<strong>in</strong>gs. This must now converged<br />

with the video security framework, and mobile security frameworks to enable seamless access and mobility.<br />

Different solutions com<strong>in</strong>g from DVB, OMA, MPEG21, have now to be def<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>in</strong>tegrated and set-up.<br />

Different paradigms from full system def<strong>in</strong>ition and standardisation (like OMA) to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of<br />

<strong>in</strong>teroperable <strong>in</strong>terfaces between different security systems (<strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uation of DVB-CA activities).<br />

The operator has to analyse how to extend its doma<strong>in</strong> to the home network on the follow<strong>in</strong>g aspects:<br />

• End to end quality of service<br />

• Security<br />

• Mobility (session mobility and user mobility), seamless handover<br />

This implies the def<strong>in</strong>ition of boundaries and the related <strong>in</strong>terfaces between the home and the cable network, and<br />

also the management and provision<strong>in</strong>g of home network devices. A first example (but not yet deployed)<br />

example of such architecture is CableHome (see annex 2).<br />

A second example of <strong>in</strong>vestigation is the usage of cable network <strong>in</strong> the home to convey broadcast and <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

AV services, and to <strong>in</strong>terconnect WLANs <strong>in</strong> the home.<br />

Besides security, the IP architecture framework <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g signall<strong>in</strong>g, QoS, devices provision<strong>in</strong>g, charg<strong>in</strong>g has<br />

to evolve to <strong>in</strong>clude video and broadcast services, and to ensure a convergent architecture with mobile networks.<br />

Packet Cable and Packet Cable Multimedia are a good basis for this evolution, to cope with multiple signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

schemes (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g SIP and RSTP), and multicast/broadcast support. Instead of def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g signall<strong>in</strong>g schemes, the<br />

tendency is more to def<strong>in</strong>e cross layer <strong>in</strong>terfaces between application layer devices and network layer devices.<br />

This ensures an openness and clear separation between network, services and applications. Therefore an<br />

evolution of current packet Cable multimedia architecture to support triple play appears to be the logical trend.<br />

This also allows to <strong>in</strong>terconnect easily fixed and mobile networks for QoS admission and control purpose. The<br />

other aspects of fixed mobile convergence are related to a more general framework <strong>in</strong>dependent of cable.<br />

Hybrid <strong>in</strong>frastructures like HFC/W <strong>in</strong>frastructures with wireless cells are desirable to provide an optimal<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure. Beside a common IP archtitecture, and common provision<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms, common MAC layer<br />

can be imag<strong>in</strong>ed as well as the medium have identical po<strong>in</strong>t to multipo<strong>in</strong>t topologies.


7.2.2.5 Roadmap<br />

Page 45 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

To def<strong>in</strong>e the requirements produced by the services, applications, or regulatory constra<strong>in</strong>ts is necessary to build<br />

a coherent technology roadmap. This is still more pert<strong>in</strong>ent s<strong>in</strong>ce these requirements are evolv<strong>in</strong>g rapidly;<br />

examples of such changes are the rapid deployment of VOIP, the explosion of high bit rate access with a rapid<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease of the bit rate, and the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand for nomadic and mobiles services. Figure 12 represents a first<br />

sketch of requirements and their effect on technology roadmap.<br />

High speed data access: Both Peer to Peer application or fast download, and competition between operators are<br />

push<strong>in</strong>g the average bit rate offered to the subscriber to a rapid <strong>in</strong>crease; a basis for the average bit rate per<br />

subscriber can be taken from the MUSE project [MUSE MA 2.4 road mapp<strong>in</strong>g] (Figure 13).<br />

Figure 12: Effect of requirements on the technology roadmap<br />

Figure 13: Evolution of bit rate


Page 46 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Different technological choices are possible, ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on an evolution to centralized or decentralized<br />

architectures:<br />

• A centralized architecture corresponds to today cable access networks implementations, and has the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g classical advantages:<br />

- Network easy to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> and reliable, as all the “<strong>in</strong>telligent” (layer 3 and above) elements are<br />

centralized<br />

- Cheap user term<strong>in</strong>al, as the signall<strong>in</strong>g protocols are very light (like MGCP for <strong>in</strong>stance)<br />

- A network capacity <strong>in</strong>crease can be imag<strong>in</strong>ed under these assumptions.<br />

• The current trend is to evolve to a decentralized architecture where the network elements are placed<br />

closer to the subscriber. It is based on peer to peer signall<strong>in</strong>g paradigms like SIP. The current<br />

economical drawbacks of this architecture (reliability and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ability, network elements and<br />

term<strong>in</strong>al costs) will no longer apply <strong>in</strong> the future, and the complexity is compensated by the scalability<br />

of the architecture.<br />

Figure 14: Technology roadmap related with network capacity<br />

Different technology roadmaps (Figure 14) can be deduced accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 2 categories of paradigms which<br />

will prevail <strong>in</strong> the future (centralized or decentralized), correspond<strong>in</strong>g to different application scenarios (peer to<br />

peer will most probably lead to decentralized architectures, whereas client server types of applications would<br />

lead to centralized architectures).<br />

Note that upper layer and lower layers centralized and decentralized architecture can be uncorrelated (upper<br />

layer decentralized model can be implemented over a centralized architecture).


7.2.3 Broadband Wireless Access<br />

7.2.3.1 Introduction<br />

Page 47 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Today a large variety of wireless technologies is be<strong>in</strong>g offered (Table 6). Each one is designed to serve a<br />

specific usage segment: Personal Area Networks (PANs), Local Area Networks (LANs), Metropolitan Area<br />

Networks (MANs), Cordless/Cellular mobile radio systems. The requirements for each usage segment are based<br />

on a number of variables, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: bandwidth needs, distance needs, power, and mobility of the user. There are<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly three standards organizations: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Eng<strong>in</strong>eers (IEEE), European<br />

Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), and the Third-Generation Partnership <strong>Project</strong> (3GPP). The<br />

IEEE and ETSI standards are <strong>in</strong>teroperable and focus primarily on wireless packet-based network<strong>in</strong>g. The 3GPP<br />

standard focuses on cellular and third-generation mobile systems. Open standard radio technologies—<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

802.11, 802.16 and future standards—offer advantages to WISPs and users. Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi)<br />

revolutionized the market for unlicensed client-access radios <strong>in</strong> a wide variety of applications. Start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2005,<br />

Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) certification of the IEEE 802.16- 2004 standard<br />

for fixed-position radios will do the same for po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t and po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multi-po<strong>in</strong>t wireless broadband<br />

equipment <strong>in</strong> both the licensed and unlicensed bands. In 2006, the IEEE 802.16e standard for portable operation<br />

is expected to be ratified, thus standardiz<strong>in</strong>g client radios <strong>in</strong> unlicensed and licensed bands.<br />

UWB Bluetooth Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Wi-Fi WIMAX WIMAX Edge<br />

CDMA2000/<br />

1xEV-DO<br />

WCDMA/<br />

UMTS<br />

Standard 802.15.3a 802.15.1 802.11a 802.11b 802.11g 802.16d 802.16e 2.5G 3G 3G<br />

Usage WPAN WPAN WLAN WLAN WLAN<br />

WMAN<br />

Fixed<br />

WMAN<br />

Portable<br />

WWAN WWAN WWAN<br />

Up to 2<br />

Up to 75 Up to 30<br />

Up to 2.4 Mb/s (up to<br />

Throughput<br />

110-480<br />

Mb/s<br />

Up to 720<br />

Kb/s<br />

Up to 54<br />

Mb/s<br />

Up to 11<br />

Mb/s<br />

Up to 54<br />

Mb/s<br />

Mb/s<br />

(20 MHz<br />

Mb/s<br />

(10 MHz<br />

Up to 384<br />

Kb/s<br />

Mb/s<br />

(typical 300-<br />

10 Mb/s<br />

with<br />

BW) BW)<br />

600 Kb/s) HSDPA<br />

technology)<br />

Range<br />

Up to 30<br />

feet<br />

Up to 30<br />

feet<br />

Up to 300<br />

feet<br />

Up to 300<br />

feet<br />

Up to 300<br />

feet<br />

Typical 4-6<br />

miles<br />

Typical 1-3<br />

miles<br />

Typical 1-5<br />

miles<br />

Typical 1-5<br />

miles<br />

400, 800,<br />

Typical 1-5<br />

miles<br />

Frequency 7.5 GHz 2.4 GHz 5 GHz 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz Sub 11 GHz 2-6 GHz 1900 MHz<br />

900, 1700,<br />

1800, 1900,<br />

2100 MHz<br />

1800, 1900,<br />

2100 MHz<br />

Table 6: Available wireless technologies (Source: Intel)<br />

In this chapter the focus is ma<strong>in</strong>ly on WMAN-systems. Usually WLAN and cellular systems are also attributed<br />

to access systems and should be described here. However, due to some overlapp<strong>in</strong>g applications with services<br />

used at <strong>in</strong>door networks these systems have been reported <strong>in</strong> the chapter on “Home Networks”.<br />

7.2.3.2 State of the art / Exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies)<br />

7.2.3.2.1 Wireless metropolitan area networks (WMANs)<br />

An implementation of the IEEE 802.16 10,11 standard, WirelessMAN TM and the European ETSI 12<br />

HiperAccess/HiperMAN provide metropolitan area network connectivity e.g. (stationary) po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t and<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t broadband wireless access systems.<br />

Applications are:<br />

• fill<strong>in</strong>g the gaps <strong>in</strong> cable and digital subscriber l<strong>in</strong>e (DSL) coverage <strong>in</strong> residential areas<br />

• for underserved rural and outly<strong>in</strong>g areas with low population density provid<strong>in</strong>g multiple services <strong>in</strong> a<br />

metropolitan area network (MAN).<br />

• the deployment of 802.11 hotspots and home/small office wireless LANs, especially <strong>in</strong> those areas<br />

where the local telephone company may have a long lead time for provision<strong>in</strong>g broadband service.<br />

10 http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/16/<br />

11 C. Eklund, et al., IEEE Standard 802.16: A Technical Overview of the WirelessMAN Air Interface for<br />

Broadband Wireless Access, IEEE Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e • June 2002<br />

12 http://www.etsi.org/


Page 48 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

IEEE 802.16 addresses the "first-mile/last-mile" connection <strong>in</strong> wireless metropolitan area networks. It focuses<br />

on the efficient use of bandwidth between 10 and 66 GHz as well as the 2 to 11 GHz region with PMP and<br />

optional Mesh topologies. It def<strong>in</strong>es a medium access control (MAC) layer that supports multiple physical layer<br />

specifications customised for the frequency band of use.<br />

The 10 to 66 GHz standard supports cont<strong>in</strong>uously vary<strong>in</strong>g traffic levels at many licensed frequencies (e.g., 10.5,<br />

25, 26, 31, 38 and 39 GHz) for two-way communications. It enables <strong>in</strong>teroperability among devices, so carriers<br />

can use products from multiple vendors and warrants the availability of lower cost equipment. The draft<br />

amendment for the 2 to 11 GHz region will support both unlicensed and licensed bands.<br />

Broadband wireless access (BWA) transmission is via free space, and is subject to attenuation and distortion by<br />

various matter such as vegetation, build<strong>in</strong>gs, precipitation and vehicles, which move and change unpredictably.<br />

IEEE Standard 802.16 recognizes this and <strong>in</strong>cludes mechanisms to make robust l<strong>in</strong>ks for PMP BWA systems<br />

with l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight. Obstructed l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight and non l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight transmission are considered <strong>in</strong> the 2-11 GHz<br />

draft amendment.<br />

Mechanisms <strong>in</strong> the WirelessMAN MAC provide for differentiated QoS to support the different needs of<br />

different applications. For <strong>in</strong>stance, voice and video require low latency but tolerate some error rate. By contrast,<br />

generic data applications cannot tolerate error, but latency is not critical. The standard accommodates voice,<br />

video, and other data transmissions by us<strong>in</strong>g appropriate features <strong>in</strong> the MAC layer, which is more efficient than<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g so <strong>in</strong> layers of control overlaid on the MAC.<br />

The standard also supports both frequency and time division duplex<strong>in</strong>g (FDD and TDD). Frequency division<br />

duplex<strong>in</strong>g (FDD), the legacy duplex<strong>in</strong>g method, has been widely deployed <strong>in</strong> cellular telephony.<br />

The orig<strong>in</strong>al standard IEEE 802.16-2001 supports access with the follow<strong>in</strong>g specifications: Frequency range:<br />

10 – 66 GHz, RF bandwidth (MHz): 28 MHz <strong>in</strong> Europe, 20, 25 MHz <strong>in</strong> USA, Range: up to some miles,<br />

Modulation, s<strong>in</strong>gle carrier: 32 Mbit/s QPSK, 64 Mbit/s 16 QAM, 96 Mbit/s 64 QAM.<br />

The IEEE 802.16a-2003 standard which was approved <strong>in</strong> 2003 specifies three physical layers for services:<br />

A s<strong>in</strong>gle-carrier access method (SCa) for special-purpose networks which operate at frequencies between 10 and<br />

66 GHz.<br />

Multicarrier methods offer<strong>in</strong>g higher data rates and higher flexibility with respect to wireless access are<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g between 2 and 11 GHz:<br />

• 256-carrier orthogonal frequency division multiplexed (OFDM) for ma<strong>in</strong>stream applications;<br />

• OFDMA with 2048 carriers for selective multicast applications, and advanced multiplex<strong>in</strong>g options.<br />

(Further details of the specifications, see Internal Delivery IC2.1 <strong>IST</strong>-MediaNet 13 and Intel Whitepaper<br />

“Understand<strong>in</strong>g Wi-Fi and WiMAX as Metro-Access Solutions 14 )<br />

The Task Group 802.16e will extend the standard to support subscriber stations mov<strong>in</strong>g at vehicular speeds and<br />

will specify a system for comb<strong>in</strong>ed fixed and mobile broadband wireless access. It <strong>in</strong>tends to fill the gap<br />

between very high data rates WLANs and very high mobility cellular systems. The standard will provide fixed,<br />

nomadic, portable and, eventually, mobile wireless broadband connectivity without the need for direct l<strong>in</strong>e-ofsight<br />

with a base station. The technology will be <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> notebook computers and PDAs, allow<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

urban areas and cities to become “MetroZones” for portable outdoor broadband wireless access.<br />

ETSI HIPERACCESS15 provides long range and fixed radio 25 Mbit/s connections to customer premises. It is<br />

used <strong>in</strong> outdoor environment for residential and small to medium-sized bus<strong>in</strong>ess applications with a coverage of<br />

up to 5 km (Po<strong>in</strong>t-to-Multipo<strong>in</strong>t). It provides wireless access to private networks and public operators (urban and<br />

rural). The focus is on frequency bands at 40.5 - 43.5 GHz, 31.8 - 33.4 GHz, 27.5 - 29.5 GHz, 24.5 - 26.5 GHz,<br />

etc. The channel size is 28 MHz, Baudrate is 22.4 MBaud. FDD mode is used at fixed asymmetric rates <strong>in</strong> paired<br />

bands, while the TDD mode is applied <strong>in</strong> unpaired bands us<strong>in</strong>g adaptive asymmetric rates.<br />

ETSI HIPERMAN16 will be an <strong>in</strong>teroperable broadband fixed wireless access system operat<strong>in</strong>g at radio<br />

frequencies between 2 GHz and 11 GHz. The HIPERMAN standard is designed for Fixed Wireless Access<br />

provision<strong>in</strong>g to SMEs and residences us<strong>in</strong>g the basic MAC (DLC and CLs) of the IEEE 802.16-2001 standard.<br />

It has been developed <strong>in</strong> very close cooperation with IEEE 802.16, such that the HIPERMAN standard and a<br />

subset of the IEEE 802.16a-2003 standard will <strong>in</strong>teroperate seamlessly. HIPERMAN is capable of support<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ATM, though the ma<strong>in</strong> focus is on IP traffic. It offers various service categories, full Quality of Service, fast<br />

13 http://www.ist-ipmedianet.org<br />

14 http://www.<strong>in</strong>tel.com/<br />

15 HIPERACCESS, ITU Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, Busan, 10 Sept. 2004 ETSI BRAN Technical Committee, Mariana Goldhamer<br />

16 HIPERMAN, http://portal.etsi.org/bran/Summary.asp


Page 49 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

connection control management, strong security, fast adaptation of cod<strong>in</strong>g, modulation and transmit power to<br />

propagation conditions and is capable of non-l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight operation. HIPERMAN enables both PMP and Mesh<br />

network configurations. It also supports both FDD and TDD frequency allocations and H-FDD term<strong>in</strong>als. All<br />

this is achieved with a m<strong>in</strong>imum number of options to simplify implementation and <strong>in</strong>teroperability.<br />

7.2.3.2.2 WiMAX: IEEE 802.16a compatible wireless standard, for serv<strong>in</strong>g metropolitan area networks<br />

(MAN)<br />

802.16a, also known as WiMAX, is a wireless network<strong>in</strong>g standard that offers greater range and bandwidth than<br />

the Wi-Fi family of standards, which <strong>in</strong>cludes 802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g. While Wi-Fi is <strong>in</strong>tended to<br />

provide coverage over relatively small areas, such as <strong>in</strong> offices or hot spots, WiMAX can transfer around 70M<br />

bit/sec over a distance of 30 miles (48 kilometres) to thousands of users from a s<strong>in</strong>gle base station. Approved <strong>in</strong><br />

January, 2003, 802.16a provides wireless, last-mile broadband access over the frequency bands below 11 GHz<br />

to connect homes, bus<strong>in</strong>esses and wireless LAN hot spots. WiMAX greatly improves non-l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight<br />

performance, and it is the most appropriate technology available when obstacles such as trees and build<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />

present. Stations can be mounted on homes or build<strong>in</strong>gs rather than towers on mounta<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

With throughput up to 75Mbit/sec, the wireless standard gives companies another way to get bus<strong>in</strong>ess-quality<br />

broadband service. While it could take several months for a carrier to provision a T-1 l<strong>in</strong>e, service providers<br />

could provision wireless service <strong>in</strong> a matter of days.<br />

WiMAX provides flexibility not possible with wired services, such as high-speed backhaul for events such as<br />

trade shows, with hundreds or even thousands of 802.11 hot-spot users. On-demand connectivity also could<br />

benefit bus<strong>in</strong>esses such as construction companies that have sporadic or nomadic connectivity needs. The<br />

802.16e extension to 802.16a <strong>in</strong>troduces nomadic capabilities that let users connect while roam<strong>in</strong>g outside their<br />

home service areas.<br />

The technology also offers privacy and Triple-DES encryption features to support secure transmissions and<br />

authentication.<br />

In a typical enterprise deployment, laptop and desktop computers are connected via wired Ethernet or 802.11<br />

Wi-Fi access po<strong>in</strong>ts located throughout the campus. A WiMAX directional antenna provides the connection<br />

from the bus<strong>in</strong>ess to a service provider's cell tower. Even if there is no l<strong>in</strong>e of sight between the antenna and the<br />

tower, signal still can be received after it reflects off build<strong>in</strong>gs or other obstructions and reaches the tower<br />

<strong>in</strong>directly. At the base station, WiMAX technology correctly <strong>in</strong>terprets the <strong>in</strong>formation even though reflections<br />

distort the radio frequency signal. Backhaul to the Internet is then provided via wireless 802.16 po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ks or by traditional wired backhaul networks.<br />

Technical aspects of 802.16a that are <strong>in</strong>strumental <strong>in</strong> power<strong>in</strong>g robust performance <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Support for licensed and license-exempt band operation below 11 GHz.<br />

• High spectral efficiency, which reduces carriers' costs and improves users' experience.<br />

• Forward error correction, for more reliable transmission.<br />

• Support for advanced antenna techniques to improve range and capacity.<br />

• Space/time cod<strong>in</strong>g to enhance performance <strong>in</strong> fad<strong>in</strong>g environments.<br />

• Adaptive modulation support, which allows for trade-off of bandwidth for range to reach customers up<br />

to 30 miles away.<br />

802.16a technology also provides low latency for delay-sensitive services such as circuit-switched voice traffic<br />

or voice over IP, optimised transport for video, and prioritisation of data traffic. This is especially important for<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses that want voice <strong>in</strong> addition to data services from their broadband service provider.<br />

Operational issues of WiMAX<br />

WiMAX's channel sizes range from 1.5 to 20MHz as well, and offer a WiMAX-based network the flexibility to<br />

support a variety of data transmitt<strong>in</strong>g rates such as E1 (2 Mbps) and higher data transmitt<strong>in</strong>g rates of up to<br />

70Mbps on a s<strong>in</strong>gle channel that can support thousands of users. This flexibility allows WiMAX to adapt to the<br />

available spectrum and channel widths <strong>in</strong> different countries or licensed to different service providers.<br />

WiMAX supports ATM, IPv4, IPv6, Ethernet, and VLAN services. So, it can provide a rich choice of service<br />

possibilities to voice and data network service providers. In addition, WiMAX provides an ideal wireless<br />

backhaul technology to connect 802.11 wireless LANs and commercial hotspots with the Internet.<br />

The WiMAX-based solution is set up and deployed like cellular systems us<strong>in</strong>g base stations that service a radius<br />

of several miles/kilometres. The most typical WiMAX-based architecture <strong>in</strong>cludes a base station mounted on a


Page 50 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g and is responsible for communicat<strong>in</strong>g on a po<strong>in</strong>t to multi-po<strong>in</strong>t basis with subscriber stations located <strong>in</strong><br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess offices and homes. The customer premise equipment (CPE) will connect the base station to a customer<br />

as well; the signal of voice and data is then routed through standard Ethernet cable either directly to a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

computer, or to an 802.11 hot spot or a wired Ethernet LAN.<br />

WiMAX-based solutions <strong>in</strong>clude many other advantages, such as robust security features, good QoS (Quality of<br />

Service), and mesh and smart antenna technology that will allow better utilization of the spectrum resources.<br />

Also, the WiMAX-based voice service can work on either traditional Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) voice<br />

or IP-based Voice (VoIP).<br />

WiMAX Connectivity and Solutions<br />

WiMAX allows equipment vendors to create many different types of IEEE802.16-based products, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

various configurations of base stations and customer premise equipment (CPE). WiMAX also allows the<br />

services provider to deliver many types of wireless access services. The WiMAX can be used on a variety of<br />

wireless broadband connections and solutions:<br />

"Last Mile" Broadband Access Solution—Metropolitan-Area Networks (MAN) connections to home and<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess office, especially <strong>in</strong> those areas that were not served by cable or DSL or <strong>in</strong> areas where the local<br />

telephone company may need a long time to deploy broadband service. The WiMAX-based wireless solution<br />

makes it possible for the service provider to scale-up or scale-down service levels <strong>in</strong> short times with the client<br />

request.<br />

Backhaul networks for cellular base stations, bypass<strong>in</strong>g the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN); the<br />

cellular service providers can look to wireless backhaul as a more cost-effective alternative. The robust WiMAX<br />

technology makes it a nice choice for backhaul for enterprises such as hotspots as well as po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

backhaul solutions.<br />

Backhaul enterprise connections to the Internet for WiFi hotspots. It will allow users to connect to a wireless<br />

Internet service provider even when they roam outside their home or bus<strong>in</strong>ess office.<br />

A variety of new bus<strong>in</strong>ess services by wireless Internet service provider.<br />

Who Are Work<strong>in</strong>g on WiMAX?<br />

The WiMax Forum17 is a non-profit organization formed <strong>in</strong> 2001 by Nokia Corp. and Ensemble<br />

Communications Inc., etc. Right now, the WiMAX Forum has more than 110 members of equipment,<br />

semiconductor suppliers, and services providers such as Alcatel, AT&T, Fujitsu, Intel, Nortel, Motorola, SBC<br />

and Siemens, and so forth. The WiMax Forum aims to support wireless metropolitan-area network<strong>in</strong>g products<br />

based on IEEE 802.16, like the Wi-Fi Alliance has done for wireless LANs and IEEE 802.11. The WiMAX<br />

Forum has most recently been work<strong>in</strong>g to promote the adoption of IEEE 802.16-compliant equipment,<br />

certification, and <strong>in</strong>teroperability test<strong>in</strong>g. In 2003, Intel Corp. became a major supporter of the WiMax Forum.<br />

In order to br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teroperability <strong>in</strong>to MAN, the WiMAX Forum is focus<strong>in</strong>g its efforts on establish<strong>in</strong>g a basel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

protocol that allows equipment and devices from multiple vendors to <strong>in</strong>teroperate and that also provides a choice<br />

to buy equipment and devices from different suppliers.<br />

Currently, there are no WiMax-certified products yet available <strong>in</strong> the market, but the race is already on. At the<br />

Intel Developer Forum <strong>in</strong> September 2004, Intel showed off its first samples of a WiMAX chipset that has been<br />

named Rosedale. Intel is plann<strong>in</strong>g to offer WiMax transmitters by 2005, and expects to ship WiMax devices for<br />

the home and office to take off by 2006. Also, Intel hopes that notebooks will beg<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>corporate WiMAX<br />

technology dur<strong>in</strong>g 2006, and by 2007, handsets for mobility will be available. Intel has already signed up<br />

Proxim and Alcatel to develop WiMAX base-station and CPE (Customer Premises Equipment) kits. Fujitsu<br />

Microelectronics America Inc. <strong>in</strong> early 2005 expects to <strong>in</strong>troduce a new WiMAX-based s<strong>in</strong>gle-chip solution for<br />

deployment <strong>in</strong> base stations and subscriber stations as well; the product <strong>in</strong>tegrates both PHY and MAC<br />

functionality. Siemens Information and Communication Mobile also plans to build complete WiMAX-based<br />

solutions for establish<strong>in</strong>g fixed, broadband speed metropolitan area wireless radio networks.<br />

17 http://www.wimaxforum.org/


7.2.3.3 Socio Economic issues<br />

Page 51 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Broadband Wireless technology as meant here encompasses all technologies that do not depend on fixed l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

and are used for broadband accesses. Thus this summary on wireless technologies is related to WLL, Satellite,<br />

FWA, etc. Cellular technologies (2G) are not considered<br />

In January 2004, DSL represented 74% of total connections and cable reached 22%. Wireless technologies are<br />

still <strong>in</strong> the early stages with few subscribers but <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g their presence 18 .<br />

The diagram <strong>in</strong> Figure 15 shows an overview on penetration of technologies enabl<strong>in</strong>g the broadband access <strong>in</strong><br />

the EU15 countries. As shown <strong>in</strong> the diagram, <strong>in</strong> seven of those countries wireless technologies are not used at<br />

all by now (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Austria and Portugal). In Luxembourg and Greece their usage is<br />

at a non notable level. In most of the other countries only small percentages of the population have access to<br />

wireless bb technologies. There two exceptions:<br />

• Exception 1: In Italy (not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the diagram because of problems of graphical presentation) a<br />

remarkable usage could be observed. There is no cable TV network available <strong>in</strong> the country and, as a<br />

consequence, no broadband cable modem services are provided. The bb market is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by DSL<br />

while the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share is split between FTTH and other technologies, with the 3G platform start<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to have a significant number of subscribers. There are 337400 connections via 3G and 91402 via<br />

Satellite.<br />

• Exception 2: In Germany Satellite technology is used far above average.<br />

50000<br />

45000<br />

40000<br />

35000<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

Wireless Broadband Penet rat ion <strong>in</strong> t he EU15*<br />

WLL 3G Satellite Other<br />

B F NL A P L G IR DK UK F S ES D<br />

Countr i es<br />

Figure 15: Wireless Broadband penetration <strong>in</strong> EU15 (Source: Commission Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, Connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Europe at High Speed: National Broadband Strategies – Annexes<br />

Additionally, it is evident, that wireless technologies <strong>in</strong> some non EU countries grow more rapidly than <strong>in</strong> EU<br />

countries (except Italy, see above). Thus <strong>in</strong> the United States wireless or fixed-satellite access accounts are<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g from 3% <strong>in</strong> 2003 to 4% <strong>in</strong> March 2004. In Japan “fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e subscribers”, hotspots and wireless<br />

access po<strong>in</strong>ts are also <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (from 1624 to 5350 at the end of 2003) and the use of hot spots <strong>in</strong>creased to<br />

9.5% up from 0.7% <strong>in</strong> 2002.<br />

Particular governmental measures appear to strengthen the growth of wireless technologies. Thus the current<br />

Korean <strong>in</strong>formation society strategy is to develop the broadband convergent network which will be used for<br />

video, data and voice and which will seamlessly comb<strong>in</strong>e wired and wireless access. And all together a<br />

catalogue of measures conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 174 issues was designed <strong>in</strong> order to ga<strong>in</strong> a technological competitive edge <strong>in</strong><br />

the world market <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g wireless communications.<br />

Additional drivers of wireless technologies appear to be (1) the necessity to fulfill demand for broadband<br />

connectivity <strong>in</strong> rural areas and (2) the demand for broadband content and communication <strong>in</strong> residential and work<br />

environments.<br />

One of the ma<strong>in</strong> obstacles to an <strong>in</strong>crease of wireless access accounts is, as technologies providers <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

claim, that WiFi, 3G, and WiMAX will compete aga<strong>in</strong>st one another and high <strong>in</strong>vestment risks therefore can not<br />

be avoided.<br />

18 Connect<strong>in</strong>g Europe at High Speed: National Broadband Strategies, May 26, 2004<br />

http://europa.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/<strong>in</strong>formation_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/broadband/com_broadband_en.doc


7.2.3.4 Issues and trends / Gap analysis<br />

Page 52 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• The WiMax Forum certification processes will start <strong>in</strong> July 2005, therefore the first WiMax certified<br />

products are expected for the end of 2005. The certification is related to IEEE 802.16-2004 equipment<br />

<strong>in</strong> the 3.5GHz band for TDD and FDD with 3.5 MHz channel width.<br />

• Intel, Texas Instruments and Fujitsu have launched volume production of their 802.16-2004 chipsets.<br />

This gives the opportunity for cost reduction now.<br />

However the migration path to 802.16e, which <strong>in</strong>cludes mobility, rema<strong>in</strong>s still unclear. All related parties agree,<br />

that the long-term success of WiMax relies on 802.16e to enable portable/mobile personal broadband access.<br />

This is seen as complement to the 3GPP long-term evolution path. The problem is, that the f<strong>in</strong>al specification of<br />

the IEEE 802.16e standard is still open. The <strong>in</strong>tegration of the Korean WiBro <strong>in</strong>to the 802.16e process br<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

new technical approaches. Especially the <strong>in</strong>troduction of the Scalable OFDMA (SOFDMA) technique is not<br />

backward compatible with 802.16-2004.<br />

7.2.3.5 Roadmap<br />

The roadmap for wireless access is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 16<br />

portable<br />

fixed<br />

802.16-2004<br />

WiMax Forum<br />

Certification process<br />

Chipset<br />

Mass production<br />

802.16-2004<br />

ratified<br />

(802.16d)<br />

WiBro<br />

Integration<br />

Pre 802.16e 802.16e <strong>in</strong>to PCs<br />

802.16d+ broad deployment<br />

2005 2010<br />

Figure 16: Roadmap for Wi Max<br />

There exist two strategies to enable mobility with WiMax. One is that there is a period of at least two years<br />

before 802.16e achieves volume, and that the upgrade path will be complex. That means the priority is to make<br />

802.16-2004 as impressive as possible <strong>in</strong> order to drive short term sales and <strong>in</strong>crease confidence <strong>in</strong> WiMAX.<br />

This will mean creat<strong>in</strong>g a so-called 'd+' technology that goes beyond the basic functions of the fixed standard,<br />

with a focus on aspects such as quality of service for voice and video, and portability with consumer grade<br />

subscriber equipment. (Source: Wireless Watch, 2005)<br />

The other view is that the market needs to move to mobility more rapidly, by offer<strong>in</strong>g pre-standard networks that<br />

provide most of the functionality promised for 'e'. This strategy rests on the belief - or hope - that the mobile<br />

standard will come to market rapidly and that the leap from its predecessor will be a simple one. (Source:<br />

Wireless Watch, 2005)<br />

Nevertheless the WiMax <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>to PCs is seen for 2009.


7.2.4 Mobile<br />

7.2.4.1 Introduction<br />

Page 53 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Ubiquitous access to the Internet is a much-vaunted feature. The hard part is squeez<strong>in</strong>g the capacity required to<br />

support the desired services <strong>in</strong>to the limited bandwidth available. A number of network technologies are<br />

available: Mobile networks are characterized by lightweight term<strong>in</strong>als, a cell based network and advanced,<br />

network based mobility management functions. The systems vary considerably <strong>in</strong> capabilities ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to<br />

different radio access methods.<br />

7.2.4.2 Current technologies<br />

7.2.4.2.1 GSM<br />

Global system for Mobile (GSM) is the most widespread mobile communication system <strong>in</strong> the world. It is<br />

currently <strong>in</strong> operation <strong>in</strong> 100+ countries. It was designed for voice communication, but has limited data<br />

communication capabilities as well. GSM uses a rigid TDMA/FDMA radio access scheme. A number of<br />

extensions are available for improv<strong>in</strong>g the data communication capacity. GSM can be upgraded with HSCSD<br />

(High Speed Circuit Switched Data) and GPRS (General Packet Radio Service). HSCSD simply comb<strong>in</strong>es a<br />

number of GSM channels to achieve higher data rates. GPRS offers packet switched access to the radio medium<br />

and is as such a way of do<strong>in</strong>g statistical multiplex<strong>in</strong>g of the radio <strong>in</strong>terface.<br />

7.2.4.2.2 EDGE<br />

Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution is an GSM upgrade consist<strong>in</strong>g of replac<strong>in</strong>g GSM’s GMSK modulation<br />

by 8PSK, thus <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the radio capacity by a factor 3. EDGE offers capacity enhancements to as well circuit<br />

as packet switch<strong>in</strong>g. It offers up to 384 kbps and is an attractive solution for operation without any UMTS<br />

license.<br />

7.2.4.2.3 UMTS<br />

Universal Mobile telecommunication system (UMTS) is a WCDMA - wideband CDMA - based cellular system<br />

and is the European standard for 3 rd generation (3G) mobile. UMTS is characterized by up to 2Mbps downl<strong>in</strong>k<br />

capacity under special conditions. The CDMA scheme comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a new channel concept makes UMTS do a<br />

very flexible and efficient use of radio resources. UMTS uses a number of new macro diversity techniques. One<br />

possibility – called soft handover – enables the mobile to connect to several base stations at the same time. This<br />

vastly improves the l<strong>in</strong>k quality.<br />

7.2.4.2.4 TETRA<br />

Terrestrial Trunked Radio is the mobile communication system of choice for e.g., police and fire department. It<br />

fits a high number of voice channels <strong>in</strong>to limited spectrum and offers limited data transmission capabilities as<br />

well. TETRA can operate <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>frastructure mode (similar to normal cellular operation) and <strong>in</strong> a direct mode <strong>in</strong><br />

which the term<strong>in</strong>al can communicate directly with each other.<br />

7.2.4.2.5 4th generation mobile<br />

The most precise def<strong>in</strong>ition of 4 th generation (4G) mobile is that it is what comes after 3 rd generation (3G). Some<br />

people believe it is yet another radio <strong>in</strong>terface with vastly <strong>in</strong>creased capacity, some believe it is rather a mixture<br />

of exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies. In the technology mix scenario, the various technologies are envisaged as layers<br />

start<strong>in</strong>g at personal level (us<strong>in</strong>g e.g., Bluetooth), through WLAN and UMTS technologies and end<strong>in</strong>g at satellite<br />

level.


7.2.4.3 Issues and Trends<br />

Page 54 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

There are number of issues related to <strong>in</strong>terconnection of various networks. The network must be able to track the<br />

mobile term<strong>in</strong>al and seamlessly transfer calls / sessions to the mobile’s location.<br />

7.2.4.3.1 Protocol issues<br />

Calls sessions can be handled a various protocol levels. One option is to handle connection mobility at the IP<br />

level, which is described <strong>in</strong> the section on IP mobility below. Another option is to make use of application level<br />

signall<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

7.2.4.3.2 Mobile IP<br />

“The unplugged <strong>in</strong>ternet”. The mobile IP method supports transparency above the IP layer, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of active TCP connections and UDP port b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. The technology is based on the assignment of<br />

two IP addresses (home address and care-of address) to each mobile term<strong>in</strong>al. The MobileIPv4 has been<br />

standardized as an addendum to IPv4 technology. The MobileIPv6 protocol is fully <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to IPv6.<br />

Mobile IP issues:<br />

• security (AAA, compatibility with firewalls),<br />

• rout<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>efficiencies and waste of bandwidth (handoff latency, packet loss, control overhead <strong>in</strong> core<br />

network)<br />

• reliability and QoS<br />

• adequate use and management of IP addresses (home address, care-of address)<br />

The IP micro-mobility concept has been developed to overcome some of the disadvantages of the mobile IP<br />

technology. It covers the movement of a mobile node with<strong>in</strong> each wireless doma<strong>in</strong>. Several protocols and<br />

mechanisms are under study such as Hierarchical mobile IP, Fast Handoff, Proactive Handoff, TeleMIP,<br />

Cellular IP, Hawaii and EMA.<br />

7.2.4.4 Possible future activities<br />

There are a number of issues related ma<strong>in</strong>ly to comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g technologies.<br />

4G challenges<br />

• High-capacity radio <strong>in</strong>terfaces<br />

• Software radio<br />

• Vertical handover


7.2.5 Satellite<br />

7.2.5.1 Introduction: Fixed satellite access <strong>in</strong> broadband for all<br />

Page 55 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Fixed GEO Satellite delivery had until recently well positioned <strong>in</strong> broadcast digital video delivery thanks to their<br />

wide geographical coverage, which make it very attractive compared to terrestrial technologies. Moreover<br />

digital video MPEG2 and H264 (or equivalent) cod<strong>in</strong>g schemes have allowed to <strong>in</strong>crease significantly the<br />

capacity and decrease the cost per program.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g Satellite for broadband access (and transport) has some <strong>in</strong>herent advantages as compared to other access<br />

technologies:<br />

• First GEO satellite have a very good subscriber coverage, as satellite networks simply overcome most<br />

of the geographical obstacles due to their angle of elevation; therefore for isolated subscriber,<br />

mounta<strong>in</strong>s, rural areas with scarce population, the technology is very competitive. Moreover for some<br />

important applications like <strong>in</strong>-flight access, satellite can be the only affordable solution.<br />

• The access architecture is scalable to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent, as add<strong>in</strong>g a user when he is under the coverage of<br />

satellite is easy; moreover network segmentation can be imag<strong>in</strong>ed when the capacity <strong>in</strong>creases, with<br />

some technical issues.<br />

• Satellite is <strong>in</strong>herently a cheap broadcast media, so it can support a mixed unicast -multicast scheme for<br />

broadband delivery, especially for video services.<br />

• We can dist<strong>in</strong>guish between different categories of architectures where satellite can be deployed:<br />

• First category is cooperative networks: an ideal access technology is the one which can comb<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> a<br />

flexible way broadcast, multicast and unicast delivery; as satellite is very competitive for broadcast and<br />

multicast, build<strong>in</strong>g a cooperative network between satellite and terrestrial appears like an optimal<br />

solution, although issues like cost models and subscriber <strong>in</strong>stallation cost have to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated.<br />

Architecture and protocols at the application level have to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated as well.<br />

• Second category is hybrid satellite-terrestrial system with satellite be<strong>in</strong>g a feeder for terrestrial wirel<strong>in</strong>e<br />

or wireless cells; various architectures can be imag<strong>in</strong>ed from direct feed to distributed storage<br />

architecture.<br />

• Third category is direct broadband subscriber connection (for professional and consumer applications);<br />

this type of access is now start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> areas not covered by other technologies.<br />

• 2 ma<strong>in</strong> ranges of technologies are of consideration:<br />

• GEOs which are used for Broadcast (Ku Band), and which use either Ka band, or a mix of Ku and Ka<br />

bands for <strong>in</strong>teractive communications;<br />

• LEOs for <strong>in</strong>teractive communications, which were used so far only for specific applications.<br />

7.2.5.2 State of the art<br />

The GEO fixed satellite systems can use 2 types of architectures:<br />

• The first one, shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 17, called Bentpipe satellite, just retransmit the RF carriers (after<br />

frequency conversion), and does not perform any signal process<strong>in</strong>g; they are technology agnostic and<br />

well suited for broadcast and many <strong>in</strong>teractive applications, except those hav<strong>in</strong>g low latency<br />

requirements. The physical layer used is DVB-S for downstream transmission; DVB-RCS is utilized<br />

for <strong>in</strong>teractive layer 1 and 2. Fram<strong>in</strong>g is based on MPEG or ATM.<br />

• The regenerative satellite architecture (Figure 18) uses on-board process<strong>in</strong>g, which allows to reduce the<br />

latency to 250 ms <strong>in</strong> the case of GEO satellites. Same transport layers and protocols are used as <strong>in</strong><br />

bentpipe. The issue of regenerative satellite is upgrade and limited process<strong>in</strong>g capacity of the on-board<br />

function, which <strong>in</strong>troduces additional constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the technical choices.


Figure 17: Bentpipe satellite architectures (from SATIP6 project)<br />

Page 56 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 18: Regenerative satellite architectures (from SATIP6 project)


7.2.5.3 Issues and trends<br />

Page 57 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

On the other end, satellite has to overcome major issues for broadband deployment:<br />

The <strong>in</strong>itial upfront <strong>in</strong>vestment of launch<strong>in</strong>g a satellite is significant, and requires a clear market model for<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractive services deployment, and subscription fee.<br />

Another major issue of satellite is its limited capacity (limited by the frequency bands used, the transmitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

power, and the size of the cells covered), mak<strong>in</strong>g the bandwidth cost relatively high; as mentioned above,<br />

satellite is a broadcast medium well adapted to broadcast/multicast architecture, but not really for large unicast<br />

traffic flow for each subscriber. This cost has to be decreased to make the technology more affordable.<br />

Other issues <strong>in</strong>herent to satellite are:<br />

• The GEO large roundtrip delay <strong>in</strong>troduces latency for time sensitive <strong>in</strong>teractive services like telephony,<br />

visiophony, and data services (this is partly solved by us<strong>in</strong>g on-board process<strong>in</strong>g described below).<br />

This large roundtrip delay can also significantly affect data transmission us<strong>in</strong>g TCP for example.<br />

• More generally physical layer issues can affect upper layer performances and require specific solutions;<br />

resources allocation and fad<strong>in</strong>g counter measures are critical. As examples of issues created by physical<br />

transmission medium variation, the MAC layer and Call Admission and control have to dynamically<br />

adapt to variation of the satellite capacity.<br />

In summary the ma<strong>in</strong> issue of satellite usage <strong>in</strong> broadband communication is the cost for a given capacity; this<br />

cost may be reduced by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the cost of satellite itself, better use of the exist<strong>in</strong>g capacity, better <strong>in</strong>tra and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter-network connectivity.<br />

In the short – medium term, provid<strong>in</strong>g broadband services with QoS via satellite implies a number of technical<br />

issues to address (often related to each other):<br />

On the physical layer side, a major issue with satellite is to optimize dynamically the channel capacity accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to propagation condition, and the user location with<strong>in</strong> a cell; <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple this optimization possible with the new<br />

DVB-S2 mechanisms.<br />

In the case of hybrid satellite terrestrial network, <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g between these networks is an issue to address, as<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imal process<strong>in</strong>g is desired at the gateway location, use of unique physical and MAC layers can be desirable.<br />

On the QoS aspects, it is necessary to def<strong>in</strong>e a QOS architecture well adapted to the satellite channel, which<br />

implies a focus on different functional layers often related to each other:<br />

• At the application level different mechanisms have to be analyzed like the def<strong>in</strong>ition and evaluation of<br />

distributed storage architectures, and specific cod<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms to cope with the channel capacity<br />

variation (especially <strong>in</strong> the case of video). In the particular case of cooperat<strong>in</strong>g network <strong>in</strong>teraction and<br />

signal<strong>in</strong>g between the 2 networks has to be analyzed.<br />

• Control and bandwidth allocation algorithms have to match with the dynamic capacity situation: CAC,<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g, flow control, rout<strong>in</strong>g are topics of research.<br />

Other issues are Mobility management <strong>in</strong> LEO, specific security solution cop<strong>in</strong>g with limited on board<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g power, transport protocols behaviour on the satellite channels, and new solutions (TCP splitt<strong>in</strong>g, new<br />

transport protocols)<br />

Multicast handl<strong>in</strong>g and signall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the different cases of satellite architectures (cooperat<strong>in</strong>g network,<br />

distributed storage) is of major importance, s<strong>in</strong>ce satellite bandwidth has currently an <strong>in</strong>herent greater cost then<br />

other terrestrial technologies.


7.2.5.4 Roadmap<br />

Page 58 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The short term vision for fixed satellite access is a conservative evolution of current systems, which <strong>in</strong>troduce<br />

requirements on the optimisation and standardisation of current systems (more efficient physical and MAC<br />

layer, adaptation to 2 ways communications, standardisation of <strong>in</strong>terface of hybrid satellite systems, <strong>in</strong>crease of<br />

on-board process<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

The rapid deployment of concurrent access technologies and the extension of these technologies for video<br />

transport may lead to more rapid changes and evolution towards a longer term target vision:<br />

• Distributed architecture: the tendency is towards <strong>in</strong> space ad-hoc networks, which can be enabled by<br />

the production of smaller and much cheaper satellites<br />

• All IP network <strong>in</strong> the sky: the above makes possible all IP network constellations<br />

• Hybrid orbits: the major technology has been GEO so far; hybrid orbits with <strong>in</strong>terorbital l<strong>in</strong>ks with<br />

LEO’s and HEO’s will br<strong>in</strong>g significant ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms of connectivity, coverage and service rout<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Hybrid networks: Satellite can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed with terrestrial or more specifically lower orbit<br />

technology like HAP for fixed and mobile access.<br />

• Distributed storage: CDN architecture is particularly efficient <strong>in</strong> a satellite environment, where a<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of multicast and storage is an optimum solution.<br />

More specifically satellite can be used as the broadcast/multicast pipe <strong>in</strong> cooperation with 3G networks for<br />

mobile multimedia access, or with terrestrial fixed po<strong>in</strong>t to po<strong>in</strong>t networks for broadband access.<br />

Figure 19: 2 configurations of satellite <strong>in</strong> an hybrid network [SATNEX]<br />

Research issues reflect<strong>in</strong>g the considerations above for Broadcast/ broadband satellite systems are:<br />

• Integration of satellite and terrestrial broadband (cooperative network)<br />

• IP security support<br />

• Mesh based and ad hoc environment<br />

• ACM and advanced modulation <strong>in</strong> the air <strong>in</strong>terface<br />

• Improvement of physical layer efficiency<br />

• Interference mitigation on satellites<br />

Cheaper and higher capacity satellites will imply the different research areas related to satellite technology:<br />

• Larger deployable antennas <strong>in</strong> the Ka band to decrease the cell size<br />

• Higher power satellites<br />

• Flexible Beam Form<strong>in</strong>g Networks and On Board Process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Packet based switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Increase of OBP capacity with lighter / smaller DSPs<br />

• Wireless on board connections


7.2.6 xDSL<br />

7.2.6.1 Current technologies<br />

Page 59 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The exist<strong>in</strong>g copper twisted pair <strong>in</strong>frastructure has been <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> the past for the public switched telephone<br />

network (PSTN). A first upgrade that enabled improved speed and the simultaneous transmission of data, while<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g use of the <strong>in</strong>stalled base of twisted pair, was ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network). However,<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased demand for faster Internet access lead to the <strong>in</strong>troduction of Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e (xDSL, where x<br />

stands for the different flavours of DSL, see below), us<strong>in</strong>g more advanced technologies and allow<strong>in</strong>g to further<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease the speed. The advantage of xDSL is that it reuses the exist<strong>in</strong>g copper <strong>in</strong>frastructure, <strong>in</strong> contrast with<br />

e.g. FTTx, which requires new fiber optic cabl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

user term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

...<br />

modem<br />

DSLAM<br />

L2 switch BAS<br />

edge<br />

router<br />

Home network Network access provider Network service<br />

provider<br />

DSLAM: Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e Access Multiplexer<br />

BAS: Broadband Access Server<br />

Figure 20: A typical xDSL access network<br />

router<br />

application<br />

server<br />

Application service<br />

provider<br />

xDSL is thus a cost-effective solution to provide broadband Internet access. Moreover, almost every household<br />

is connected to the telephone network, <strong>in</strong> contrast with e.g. the television cable network, whose penetration rate<br />

differs between various regions <strong>in</strong> the world. Worldwide, the number of xDSL subscribers reached 63.8 million<br />

by March 2004 19 . Besides these factors, xDSL has the advantage that it offers a dedicated amount of bandwidth<br />

to the users (with a cable network, the bandwidth is shared between a group of users).<br />

xDSL allows the simultaneous transmission of voice and data traffic. In the past, only a small portion of the<br />

available bandwidth was used for the transmission of voice traffic. With xDSL, the frequency spectrum is<br />

divided <strong>in</strong> a frequency band for voice, a frequency band for uploaded data traffic and a frequency band for<br />

download traffic (Figure 21). The exact frequency band used depends on the deployed xDSL flavour. The<br />

achievable speed depends on the distance between the user and the DSLAM, on the wire gauge, and on the used<br />

xDSL flavour.<br />

Voice Upload Download<br />

4 kHz<br />

Figure 21: Voice, upload and download data traffic are separated<br />

<strong>in</strong>to different frequency regions.<br />

19 DSL forum, http://www.dslforum.org/PressRoom/news_3.2.2004_WesternEU.doc


The different types of xDSL are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 7.<br />

Page 60 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Name Mean<strong>in</strong>g Data Rate Mode Application<br />

DSL Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e 160 Kbps Duplex ISDN services, voice and data<br />

ADSL Asymmetric DSL 1.5 to 10 Mbps Downl<strong>in</strong>k Internet Access, VoD, <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

multimedia<br />

HDSL High bit-rate DSL 1.544, 2.048 Mbps Duplex LAN access, server access<br />

SHDSL S<strong>in</strong>gle pair High-speed DSL 1.544, 2.048 Mbps Duplex Same as HDSL + access for<br />

symmetric services<br />

VDSL Very-high data rate DSL 13 to 52 Mbps Downl<strong>in</strong>k Same as ADSL and HDTV<br />

Table 7: xDSL technologies 20<br />

Figure 22: Bandwidth versus reach of xDSL technologies) 21<br />

ADSL is the most popular xDSL technology for the moment. Due to its asymmetric nature, it is very suited for<br />

e.g. web brows<strong>in</strong>g and other typical Internet application where the downstream traffic is usually larger than the<br />

upstream traffic. ADSL and ADSL2+ are two improved versions of ADSL. The improvements of ADSL2 over<br />

ADSL are an <strong>in</strong>creased speed, an <strong>in</strong>creased reach (allow<strong>in</strong>g more users to use xDSL technology), and several<br />

technical issues that allow cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs. ADSL2+ <strong>in</strong>creases the bandwidth by extend<strong>in</strong>g the useable frequencies<br />

on the l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

SHDSL connections are suited for connect<strong>in</strong>g servers, and for the (bus<strong>in</strong>ess) use of services that requires high<br />

speed <strong>in</strong> both directions. Unlike ADSL, SHDSL cannot carry voice traffic besides the data traffic, s<strong>in</strong>ce the low<br />

frequency band is used to extend the upload band.<br />

VDSL is the newest and fastest DSL flavor. It allows for much higher speeds than the other xDSL technologies,<br />

but the disadvantage is the limited reach. This implies that the cable network has to be rolled out further <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

access, and that VDSL is more suited for densely populated regions than rural areas. VDSL can already been<br />

seen as a hybrid fibre DSL solution for broadband access.<br />

7.2.6.2 Introduction to trends and issues to be followed dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of BREAD<br />

• Available bitrate and achievable reach<br />

• Penetration and usage of different xDSL flavours worldwide<br />

• Architectural options and evolution<br />

• DSLAM options and evolution<br />

• IPv6 awareness of DSL access networks<br />

20 S. Rao, “NGN Drivers: Access and core Networks, legacy services migration issues”, Workshop on "Next Generation Networks: What,<br />

When and How ?" July 2003, Geneva, http://www.itu.<strong>in</strong>t/itudoc/itu-t/workshop/ngn/s3_02_pp7.ppt<br />

21 P. Vogel, “Bridg<strong>in</strong>g Towards Broadband Access Technologies”, <strong>IST</strong> OPTIM<strong>IST</strong> workshop “The Roadmap towards Optimised Access<br />

Network Solutions”, September 2003, Rim<strong>in</strong>i, http://www.ist-optimist.org/pdf/workshops/ECOC2003/ECOC2003_Vogel.pdf<br />

23 www.ist-athena.org


7.2.7 FTTx<br />

7.2.7.1 Introduction<br />

Page 61 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

“All-Optical” is the vision for future wired networks, where we use fibre for all wires <strong>in</strong> the WAN, MAN and<br />

Access. Nowadays, optical fibres are ubiquitous <strong>in</strong> the backbone network, and an extension to access networks<br />

is the logical next step. An optical fibre based access network offers of all available technologies by far the<br />

highest speed and can support an unlimited set of services. FTTx (Fibre to the x, where x stands for Curb or<br />

Cab<strong>in</strong>et (C), Premises (P), Build<strong>in</strong>g (B), Home (H), Desk (D)) would thus be a future-proof access solution.<br />

With FTTH or FTTB the optical connection reaches the home of the build<strong>in</strong>g of the end-user. This implies a<br />

tremendous <strong>in</strong>vestment. Fibre to the Curb or Cab<strong>in</strong>et (FTTC) will br<strong>in</strong>g the optical fibre to a service node <strong>in</strong> a<br />

nearby location outside the customer premises, which is a more cost-effective solution. Comb<strong>in</strong>ations of a fibre<br />

optic access network with a traditional twisted pair or coax access network (HFC) or a wireless access network<br />

(FWA) are <strong>in</strong>termediate solutions.<br />

Traditionally, an optical fibre access network was not realistic due to the very high <strong>in</strong>stallation and equipment<br />

cost. Dropp<strong>in</strong>g cost of the end equipment and new roll-out techniques will make FTTx however a feasible<br />

option. At the moment, optical components are gett<strong>in</strong>g cheaper but are still relatively expensive, and it is<br />

important the service fees meet the consumer price po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, are their sufficient applications for the huge bandwidths that come available with FTTx? There are some<br />

potential drivers, but their extent of demand is not clear: e.g. Video Conferenc<strong>in</strong>g, Multimedia Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment,<br />

Long Distance Learn<strong>in</strong>g, Gam<strong>in</strong>g, Video on Demand. And will <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g bandwidth spur on new applications<br />

or will new applications spur bandwidth? Speed seems the most important driver for new applications,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the view of the lead<strong>in</strong>g broadband countries <strong>in</strong> Asia.<br />

7.2.7.2 State of the Art<br />

7.2.7.2.1 Architecture<br />

The ultimate goal is to br<strong>in</strong>g the fibre to the home user by replac<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g copper/coax cables. The<br />

evolution of the network will therefore be limited to the part go<strong>in</strong>g from the central office (CO) to the home<br />

user. In an optical access network, the CO conta<strong>in</strong>s an optical l<strong>in</strong>e term<strong>in</strong>al (OLT), which provides the network<strong>in</strong>terface<br />

to the user, and this OLT is connected to one or more optical network units (ONU) at the user-side.<br />

The replacement of the l<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong> an access network by an optical cable leads to numerous possible topologies.<br />

An important dist<strong>in</strong>ction is the choice between po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t (P2MP) and po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t (P2P)<br />

connections (more or less correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the dist<strong>in</strong>ction between passive and active). Nowadays, the most<br />

important po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t configuration of an optical access network is a (power splitt<strong>in</strong>g) time division<br />

multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (TDM)-based passive optical network (PON). A PON is made up of fibre optic cabl<strong>in</strong>g, of<br />

passive splitters and couplers that distribute an optical signal through a branched "tree" topology to connectors<br />

that term<strong>in</strong>ate each fibre segment. A PON has some important advantages:<br />

• Po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t deployment requires less fibre layout to cover a given area than its po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

counterpart us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual fibres to each customer (the fibre complexity for (C)WDM PON<br />

architectures is comparable).<br />

• The equipment at the CO is also lower cost s<strong>in</strong>ce one optical <strong>in</strong>terface services an entire network<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead of one dedicated user.<br />

• The PON approach, with its lack of active devices along the fibre route, means that power is needed<br />

only at the fibre’s term<strong>in</strong>ation (home user and CO).<br />

Compared to other access technologies, PON elim<strong>in</strong>ates much of the <strong>in</strong>stallation, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, and management<br />

expenses needed to connect to customer premises. However, a power splitt<strong>in</strong>g TDM-PON has also some<br />

important <strong>in</strong>herent drawbacks:<br />

• The same bandwidth has to be divided between several users.<br />

• The optical splitter divides the optical power among its output ports, which causes large <strong>in</strong>sertion<br />

losses. This limits the maximum transmission distance possible between OLT and ONUs.<br />

• All the ONUs connected to the same optical splitter receive the same optical signal. This is a benefit <strong>in</strong><br />

case of multicast traffic, but <strong>in</strong> case of unicast traffic this raises some concerns about network security.<br />

Thus, a good encryption is of great importance.


Page 62 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• A PON demands that only one ONU is active at each time, but a malicious user that emits light<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously can corrupt the entire upstream transmission.<br />

• Upstream bandwidth is not broadcast. To catch upstream traffic, there will be a need for an <strong>in</strong>telligent<br />

time division multiple access (TDMA) protocol.<br />

Current TDM-PON standards specify the l<strong>in</strong>e rate up to 2.5 Gb/s and maximum l<strong>in</strong>k reach of 20 km, and<br />

typically with a split ratio of 1:32.<br />

In the first-generation optical access networks, the major thrust has been economical deployment, and a power<br />

splitt<strong>in</strong>g PON was the most opportune solution. Nowadays, the cost of optical devices has decreased a lot, and<br />

design considerations other than cost will become important. To overcome some of the demerits of a pure power<br />

splitt<strong>in</strong>g TDM-PON, some different types of PONs are also available: WDM PONs, WDM power splitt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

PONs, WDM PONs with overlay for broadcast. Thanks to the use of WDM, a PON can also set up a virtual<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t connection. WDM has been considered an ideal solution to extend the capacity of PONs without<br />

drastically chang<strong>in</strong>g the currently deployed fibre structure. Further, it also shares many benefits of TDM-PON:<br />

e.g. by us<strong>in</strong>g an arrayed waveguide grat<strong>in</strong>g (AWG) the signal path can still be completely passive.<br />

Instead of hav<strong>in</strong>g a PON, it is also possible to deploy an active network, which looks very similar to a PON,<br />

however with some important differences. The most fundamental one is to replace the passive, unmanageable<br />

splitters <strong>in</strong> the field by an active node. An important consequence is that a power l<strong>in</strong>e between the CO and the<br />

active node will be necessary. Second, <strong>in</strong>stead of shar<strong>in</strong>g bandwidth among multiple subscribers, each end user<br />

is provided a dedicated connection that provides full bi-directional bandwidth. This can be implemented us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the SDM (Space Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g) or WDM (Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g) technique. Because of its<br />

dedicated nature, this type of architecture is also referred to as po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t (P2P). The third architectural<br />

difference between PON and active node is the distance limitation. In a PON, the furthest subscriber must be<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 10-20km from the CO, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the total number of splits (max. 1:32). An active network, on the<br />

other hand, has a distance limitation of ca. 80km, regardless of the number of subscribers be<strong>in</strong>g served. The<br />

number of subscribers is limited only by the switches employed, and not by the <strong>in</strong>frastructure itself, as <strong>in</strong> the<br />

case of PON. The active node will typically be an Ethernet Switch, and the available bit rate is now up to 10<br />

Gbps.<br />

Also hybrid PONs are be<strong>in</strong>g developed; they are a literal comb<strong>in</strong>ation of an active node and a PON<br />

architecture. The reachable distance is higher than <strong>in</strong> case of us<strong>in</strong>g a power splitt<strong>in</strong>g PON, and this with a<br />

simpler <strong>in</strong>frastructure than a completely active topology.<br />

7.2.7.2.2 Transmission Protocol<br />

The transmission protocol used by a FTTx network will be either Ethernet or ATM. Ethernet represents today<br />

90% of the <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong>terfaces for LAN. It offers large spectrum of data rates, from 10 Mbit/s and up to 10<br />

Gbit/s for the last evolution. This predom<strong>in</strong>ance leads to very low cost: 100 Mbit/s Ethernet <strong>in</strong>terfaces are more<br />

than 10 times cheaper than 155 Mbit/s ATM <strong>in</strong>terfaces used for metropolitan and core networks. Moreover,<br />

Ethernet is based on a simple protocol, while offer<strong>in</strong>g advanced services: quality of service (QoS), good<br />

granularity, high throughput … Systems based on ATM standards are slower (reach only 622 Mb/s) and have<br />

more expensive components than Ethernet based ones, but they offer higher quality of service and are<br />

connection oriented, while Ethernet is connectionless. Two groups are work<strong>in</strong>g on standards: IEEE 802.3ah<br />

(EFM: Ethernet <strong>in</strong> the First Mile) and FSAN (Full Service Access Network).<br />

The challenge for EFM is to enable effective Ethernet network designs for subscriber access networks that can<br />

deliver quantifiable enhancements to current offer<strong>in</strong>gs at a reasonable cost. Us<strong>in</strong>g Ethernet for FTTH seems to<br />

be a good solution. Nevertheless, the actual Ethernet standards do not offer a reachable distance compatible with<br />

this application (hundred meters while up to 20 km is needed). Aware of this problem, new fibre based standards<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t connections up to 10 km and po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t connections up to 20 km are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

developed. The EFM task force has targeted three subscriber access network topologies: po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t on<br />

optical fibre, po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t on optical fibre and po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t on copper. The first two of them lead to two<br />

important standards for FTTH deployment:<br />

• The EFM objective to standardize Gigabit Ethernet (1000BASE-X) optics to operate po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

over a s<strong>in</strong>gle strand of s<strong>in</strong>gle mode will enable cost-effective, high-performance broadband access.<br />

Po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t gigabit networks offer <strong>in</strong>credible flexibility and scalability for the future. When the<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess case exists to deliver not just high speed Internet access, but other services such as voice and<br />

video, po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t Ethernet over optical fibre is an excellent solution.<br />

• The EFM objective to support passive optical networks (EPONs) is based on a number of economic<br />

advantages. The OLT supports a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 16 subscribers per port by means of a passive optical


Page 63 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

splitter. Thus the Ethernet PON m<strong>in</strong>imizes the number of fibres that need to be managed <strong>in</strong> the CO and<br />

also m<strong>in</strong>imizes the equipment required <strong>in</strong> the CO, compared with a po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t topology. This<br />

economic benefit is significant. The EPON physical layer specification will support distances between<br />

the OLT and ONU up to 20 kilometres depend<strong>in</strong>g on split ratio and optical l<strong>in</strong>k budgets.<br />

FSAN def<strong>in</strong>ed requirements for APON (ATM PON), BPON (Broadband PON) and GPON (Gigabit PON), and<br />

they feed their recommendations <strong>in</strong>to ITU–T G.983 and G.984 family:<br />

• The <strong>in</strong>itial PON specifications def<strong>in</strong>ed by the FSAN committee used ATM as their layer 2 signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

protocol. As such, they became known as ATM-based PONs or APONs.<br />

• Use of the term APON led users to believe that only ATM services could be provided to end-users, so<br />

the FSAN decided to broaden the name to Broadband PON or BPON. BPON systems offer numerous<br />

broadband services <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ethernet access and video distribution.<br />

• In 2001 the FSAN group <strong>in</strong>itiated a new effort for standardiz<strong>in</strong>g PON networks operat<strong>in</strong>g at bit rates of<br />

above 1 Gb/s. A new solution has emerged <strong>in</strong>to the optical access market place: Gigabit PON or<br />

GPON, offer<strong>in</strong>g unprecedented high bit rate support while enabl<strong>in</strong>g transport of multiple services,<br />

specifically data and TDM, <strong>in</strong> native formats and at an extremely high efficiency.<br />

7.2.7.3 Socio Economic Issues<br />

By the end of June 2004, there were approximately 550000 FTTx subscribers <strong>in</strong> Europe (EU25 + Norway &<br />

Iceland) (Figure 23). This means only between 1.5% and 2% of the broadband connections are provided by<br />

FTTx. Furthermore, FTTx is today ma<strong>in</strong>ly concentrated <strong>in</strong> a limited number of European countries. More than<br />

95% of the current FTTx subscribers are located <strong>in</strong> only 4 countries: Sweden, Italy, Denmark and The<br />

Netherlands. In Sweden approximately 18% of the broadband connections are delivered by FTTx, while <strong>in</strong> Italy<br />

this percentage is nearly 5%, <strong>in</strong> Denmark 9% and <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands 2%.<br />

250,000<br />

200,000<br />

150,000<br />

100,000<br />

50,000<br />

0<br />

Austria<br />

FTTx subscribers by the end of June 2004<br />

Belgium<br />

Denmark<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

France<br />

Germany<br />

Italy<br />

Netherlands<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Sweden<br />

UK<br />

Others EU<br />

17<br />

Figure 23: FTTx subscribers by the end of June 2004 (Source: IDATE)<br />

In June 2004, the situation <strong>in</strong> Europe (EU 25 + Norway & Iceland) was as follows: there were 167 locations<br />

where FTTx <strong>in</strong>itiatives have been launched, and 103 players were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> (Table 8). Among them, nearly<br />

70% are municipalities or power utilities. Furthermore, approximately 60% of these deployments are at<br />

commercial phase, 20% are pilots and 20% are at a project phase.<br />

Incumbent operators 8 7,8%<br />

Municipalities / power utilities 72 69,9%<br />

Alternative operators / ISPs 9 8,7%<br />

Hous<strong>in</strong>g companies & Other 14 13,6%<br />

Table 9: Players <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> FTTx <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

Iceland<br />

Norway


Page 64 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In Sweden as well as <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands, to a large degree, the FTTx success can be attributed to government<br />

action plans and national and regional fund<strong>in</strong>g schemes. Both central government and municipalities are<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g several FTTx <strong>in</strong>itiatives. Their common purpose is to create a positive economical environment,<br />

which will stimulate the regions where the <strong>in</strong>itiatives are taken.<br />

The success of FTTx <strong>in</strong> Italy can be ma<strong>in</strong>ly attributed to FastWeb, a jo<strong>in</strong>t venture of several power utilities <strong>in</strong><br />

the Milan region. Orig<strong>in</strong>ally, they only operate <strong>in</strong> the Milan region, but nowadays they deploy their fibre<br />

network also <strong>in</strong> several other Italian cities.<br />

In Europe, the participation of <strong>in</strong>cumbent operators <strong>in</strong> the deployment of FTTx is not very high. The roll out of a<br />

complete fibre network is still rather expensive (20 to 50 EUR/meter, dependent on rural or urban areas) and<br />

most of them do not see a profitable advantage <strong>in</strong> deploy<strong>in</strong>g such a network.<br />

Outside Europe, important FTTx countries are Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong, they are the world leaders <strong>in</strong><br />

the field of FTTx. There, the <strong>in</strong>cumbents are very well <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> FTTx. FTTx is ma<strong>in</strong>ly Fibre to the Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> these cases, and by the concentration of population <strong>in</strong> few urban centres and <strong>in</strong> multi-dwell<strong>in</strong>g units, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> a fibre network will be cheaper per resident.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, an important po<strong>in</strong>t to stress is that most of the FTTx deployments <strong>in</strong> Europe (e.g.: Sweden: Stockholm,<br />

Italy: Milan, The Netherlands: E<strong>in</strong>dhoven, Amsterdam) as well as <strong>in</strong> Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong, are<br />

<strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> densely populated cities. In the USA, we see most of the FTTx deployments are rather <strong>in</strong> rural areas,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> green field areas. The dist<strong>in</strong>ction between the USA and the rest of the world can be declared by the<br />

fact that the size and population distribution of the USA is dist<strong>in</strong>ct from the other countries. The subscriber loop<br />

lengths are typically longer <strong>in</strong> the USA, and by consequence the cost per resident to roll out a FTTH network is<br />

higher. This declares why <strong>in</strong> the USA FTTx is ma<strong>in</strong>ly attractive <strong>in</strong> green field, but not <strong>in</strong> more densely<br />

populated areas.<br />

7.2.7.4 Issues and trends / Gap analysis<br />

7.2.7.4.1 FTTH Deployment<br />

In Europe, more than 95% of the FTTx subscribers are concentrated <strong>in</strong> 4 countries: Sweden, Italy, The<br />

Netherlands and Denmark:<br />

• In Sweden, to a large degree, the FTTx success can be attributed to government action plans and<br />

national and regional fund<strong>in</strong>g schemes. The government is also actively <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> fibre<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure: e.g. Stokab, a dark fibre provider <strong>in</strong> the Stockholm county, is wholly owned by the City<br />

of Stockholm. Their purpose is to stimulate positive growth <strong>in</strong> the Stockholm region by creat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

favourable conditions for IT development.<br />

• Also <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands, there is a lot of government support: central government as well as<br />

municipalities. Kenniswijk is an experimental environment <strong>in</strong> the E<strong>in</strong>dhoven area where FTTH<br />

connections are deployed, and the project is supported by the central government. The <strong>in</strong>tention is that<br />

the developments with<strong>in</strong> the Kenniswijk-area are, on average, two years ahead of the rest of the<br />

Netherlands, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a "consumer market of the future". Besides, a lot of municipalities also <strong>in</strong>vest<br />

<strong>in</strong> FTTH realizations, and today there are many fibre pilots: Almere, Amsterdam, App<strong>in</strong>gedam,<br />

Enschede, Rotterdam, Amersfoort, Nuenen, Gron<strong>in</strong>gen, The Hague, Dordrecht...<br />

• The success of FTTH <strong>in</strong> Italy can be ma<strong>in</strong>ly attributed to FastWeb, which is a jo<strong>in</strong>t venture between<br />

the Milan publicly owned gas and electric utilities and a private group known as e.Biscom. Orig<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />

they only operate <strong>in</strong> the Milan region, but nowadays they deploy their fibre network also <strong>in</strong> several<br />

other Italian cities.<br />

The participation of <strong>in</strong>cumbent operators <strong>in</strong> the deployment of FTTx is not very high <strong>in</strong> Europe. The roll out of a<br />

complete fibre network is still rather expensive and most of them do not see a profitable advantage <strong>in</strong> deploy<strong>in</strong>g<br />

such a network. The success <strong>in</strong> some European countries is ma<strong>in</strong>ly the consequence of a lot of government<br />

support (central government as well as municipalities). But also, <strong>in</strong> a lot of European countries (UK, France,<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong>, Belgium), the FTTH deployment is very low or totally not available.<br />

Outside Europe, important FTTx countries are Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong, they are the world leaders <strong>in</strong><br />

the field of FTTx. There, the <strong>in</strong>cumbents are very well <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> FTTx (e.g: Japan: USEN, NTT West, NTT<br />

East; South Korea: KT). FTTx is ma<strong>in</strong>ly Fibre to the Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> these cases, and by the concentration of<br />

population <strong>in</strong> few urban centres and <strong>in</strong> multi-dwell<strong>in</strong>g units, the <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> a fiber network will be cheaper<br />

per resident. In the US, FTTx deployment is rather limited. It is also remarkable the FTTH deployments <strong>in</strong> the


Page 65 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

US are ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> rural areas and less <strong>in</strong> major cities, while <strong>in</strong> Japan and Europe, FTTH appears <strong>in</strong> densely<br />

populated areas.<br />

The two most important technologies with<strong>in</strong> the scope of FTTx are Ethernet <strong>in</strong> the First Mile over Po<strong>in</strong>t-to-Po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Fibre and Passive Optical Networks (EPON, APON, BPON, GPON). Beyond the USA, PON deployment is<br />

very low, <strong>in</strong> a lot of other countries (Japan, Sweden, Italy…), the FTTx networks are ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on EFM over<br />

Po<strong>in</strong>t-to-Po<strong>in</strong>t connections.<br />

7.2.7.4.2 Gap analysis<br />

Technologically, there are two important challenges for the future:<br />

• To <strong>in</strong>crease capacity.<br />

• To extend the distance between CO and user.<br />

The extension to WDM-PONs ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>terest. WDM efficiently exploits the large capacity of optical fibre<br />

without much change <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (GPON) are now standardised<br />

and commercially available, which means that PONs are approach<strong>in</strong>g bit rates where one could consider us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them for metro as well as access applications. To use a PON for long reach access needs three new features:<br />

reach extension to ~100 km, a high split ratio (>64); and ideally WDM should be used. Nowadays, there is a lot<br />

of research <strong>in</strong> this doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Another important topic is the cost of the optical components, especially for the ONUs. Maturity of optical<br />

components and large-scale <strong>in</strong>tegration/manufactur<strong>in</strong>g of ONU have dropped the prices. To keep the cost of the<br />

ONU low, there is also a lot of <strong>in</strong>terest for colourless ONUs. This means there is no laser available <strong>in</strong> the ONU,<br />

however <strong>in</strong> the OLT an optical carrier for upstream signals is generated, and the upstream transmission is then<br />

provided by externally modulat<strong>in</strong>g these signals.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, consider<strong>in</strong>g the deployment of FTTx, the follow<strong>in</strong>g factors are essential:<br />

• Policy/regulatory support, either active participation by the government by f<strong>in</strong>ancial support (cf.<br />

Sweden, The Netherlands), or passive by creat<strong>in</strong>g a positive regulation climate (cf. Japan, South<br />

Korea).<br />

• The <strong>in</strong>terest of the <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom operators (cf. Japan, South Korea), this can be stimulated by a<br />

clear government policy.<br />

• Advanced (new) services that can create a clear revenue opportunity.<br />

7.2.7.5 Roadmap<br />

FTTB and FTTH can be regarded as the logical endpo<strong>in</strong>t of an ongo<strong>in</strong>g evolution. In the pre-fibre days, Telco<br />

COs were <strong>in</strong>terconnected by coax and microwave, while cable head ends were fed by microwave or satellite.<br />

The first step <strong>in</strong> “fiberiz<strong>in</strong>g” the entire system was Hybrid Fibre Coax (HFC) (be<strong>in</strong>g widely deployed by the<br />

cable <strong>in</strong>dustry today), <strong>in</strong> which the node becomes an optical network unit. HFC serves several hundred homes<br />

per fibre end, each us<strong>in</strong>g copper (coax) <strong>in</strong> both directions between “node” and subscriber, but with limited bit<br />

rate and very demand<strong>in</strong>g design rules.<br />

The slowly emerg<strong>in</strong>g Fibre to the Curb (FTTC) systems split each upstream or downstream fibre <strong>in</strong>to 10-100<br />

subscriber copper paths. It is not clear that FTTC systems offer any economic advantage over full FTTH/B,<br />

which is just the logical extension of HFC to FTTC to a s<strong>in</strong>gle subscriber per fibre. Because of its non-optimum<br />

economics, FTTC is likely to be overtaken by the clean passive-all-the-way FTTH option, i.e. PON.<br />

The current PON technology ma<strong>in</strong>ly uses power splitt<strong>in</strong>g PONs, but (C)WDM is another important PON<br />

approach, which will ga<strong>in</strong> more and more <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the future. When deploy<strong>in</strong>g a PON, a technological choice<br />

between either ATM-based (APON or its successors BPON, GPON) or Ethernet-based (EPON) has to be made.<br />

It really makes little difference architecturally whether the <strong>in</strong>ternals of the PON speak Ethernet or ATM, s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

the <strong>in</strong>terfaces to the user and to the CO equipment are identical <strong>in</strong> both cases. The important issue will be cost to<br />

the end user and speed of acceptance. In view of the superior component cost for Ethernet chips compared to<br />

ATM chips, perhaps the only th<strong>in</strong>g that will give the race to APONs is that, if the large <strong>in</strong>cumbent local<br />

exchange ever get mov<strong>in</strong>g with PONs, they may cl<strong>in</strong>g to ATM because of its familiarity and its exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

certifications. One predicts that <strong>in</strong> the long run APONs will go the way of ISDN – not completely dead, but a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ority player.<br />

Another all-fibre solution is the active architecture, which ga<strong>in</strong>s more and more <strong>in</strong>terest. Active Ethernet is<br />

quietly becom<strong>in</strong>g the preferred choice among lead<strong>in</strong>g service providers worldwide for their fibre deployments.<br />

From an economical view, <strong>in</strong> the past, PONs were the preferred choice. But nowadays, fibre costs have dropped


Page 66 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

to a fraction of what they were just a few years ago. And also some technological developments have an<br />

important <strong>in</strong>fluence:<br />

• The completion of the IEEE 802.3ah Ethernet <strong>in</strong> the First Mile (EFM) standard that def<strong>in</strong>es, among<br />

other th<strong>in</strong>gs, a method for deliver<strong>in</strong>g Ethernet over a s<strong>in</strong>gle strand of fibre.<br />

• The evolution of environmentally hardened Ethernet devices that can be placed <strong>in</strong> the outside plant.<br />

Prior to the availability of this type of gear, network operators would have to pull the fibre from every<br />

subscriber all the way back to their CO. Then at the CO, a large electrooptic port count was needed.<br />

An Active architecture has one arguable drawback from a deployment perspective, and that is the requirement<br />

for power <strong>in</strong> the outside plant. However, Active electronics <strong>in</strong> the field are noth<strong>in</strong>g new and many Telco’s have<br />

already powered electronics <strong>in</strong> the field.<br />

Most FTTx products today use po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t Ethernet or power splitt<strong>in</strong>g PON solutions. Some people also<br />

believe the PON approach for deep fibre deployments is geared more toward Telco’s who have traditionally not<br />

had power <strong>in</strong> the field. For people like cable operators and utility companies that already have power <strong>in</strong> the field,<br />

it’s not a big issue.


7.2.8 DVB-T<br />

7.2.8.1 Introduction:<br />

Page 67 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

There are major differences between Telecommunications and Digital Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g sectors. However, the dream<br />

of service providers is to provide a s<strong>in</strong>gle network to provide both enterta<strong>in</strong>ment (broadcast) and<br />

telecommunication services. A notion of convergence has been recently achieved at technological and service<br />

level, through DVB-T broadband access technologies<br />

This convergence was ma<strong>in</strong>ly empowered by the work carried out <strong>in</strong> the field of ‘Interactive Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g’,<br />

which was the subject of <strong>in</strong>novative work carried out by a number of Research and Development projects <strong>in</strong> the<br />

5th European Framework Programme. The ultimate goal of these projects was to provide new affordable<br />

services to the users, fulfill<strong>in</strong>g two observed tendencies: i) the personalisation of services, that cannot be offered<br />

by traditional one-to-many broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks, and ii) the consumption of bandwidth hungry multimedia<br />

services that cannot be offered by exist<strong>in</strong>g communication networks especially on the move. The objective of<br />

further development of the subject of Interactive Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g was confronted by the European commission <strong>in</strong><br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g the technological and service issues which require further R&D <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: i) video and audio<br />

delivery to mobile term<strong>in</strong>als, ii) traffic symmetry/asymmetry, iii) market prospects of the <strong>in</strong>troduction of new<br />

services and applications, vi) regulatory and spectrum issues, and f<strong>in</strong>ally, and most predom<strong>in</strong>ant, the need of<br />

synergy (better than convergence) between broadcasters and telecom operators towards the <strong>in</strong>troduction of the<br />

next generation networks (NGN).<br />

The major obstacle towards digital switchover is the spectrum valuation and the shar<strong>in</strong>g of frequencies,<br />

especially <strong>in</strong> the UHF band. Telecom operators require part of the UHF band to be allocated for mobile<br />

communication, while broadcasters proclaim their ownership of the entire frequency band.<br />

7.2.8.2 Current status of DVB-T<br />

Most of the countries across the world have adopted the DVB-T technology for digital broadcast of video<br />

programmes. The details and statistics can be seen at the DVB forum web site www.dvb.org<br />

The deployment status and plans vary from country to country. The DVB forum is also a good resource for<br />

country specific status of DVB-T deployment.<br />

7.2.8.3 Trends and Future of DVB-T<br />

Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the network<strong>in</strong>g aspect of the new digital television (regenerative DVB-T stream) the<br />

creation of a common Ethernet backbone, present <strong>in</strong> the entire city via the DVB-T stream, and accessed by all<br />

citizens via wireless (i.e. WLAN, Optical, UMTS) and/or wired channels (i.e. PSTN, ISDN, xDSL) is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

addressed. The proposal is the use of the regenerative DVB-T stream <strong>in</strong> a backbone topology for the creation of<br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle access broadband physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure with multi-service capabilities, able to <strong>in</strong>terconnect NGN IP<br />

nodes of a city (and/or <strong>in</strong>dividual users), besides accommodat<strong>in</strong>g broadcast services (digital TV programmes).<br />

7.2.8.4 <strong>IST</strong> projects <strong>in</strong>volved:<br />

ATHENA project 23 is address<strong>in</strong>g DVB-T technology as a solution for broadband for all concept. The system<br />

architecture envisaged <strong>in</strong> the projects is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 24.<br />

The overall architecture of such an <strong>in</strong>frastructure comprises two core subsystems: I) a number of Cell Ma<strong>in</strong><br />

Nodes (CMN), and II) a central broadcast<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t. Each CMN enables a number of simple users<br />

(geographically neighbour<strong>in</strong>g the CMN) to access IP services hosted by the network. The communication<br />

between the simple users and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g CMN is achieved via broadband po<strong>in</strong>t-to-multipo<strong>in</strong>t l<strong>in</strong>ks (i.e<br />

WLAN). The CMN gathers all IP traffic stemm<strong>in</strong>g from its users, and forwards it to the central broadcast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t (UHF transmission po<strong>in</strong>t visible by all CMNs) via dedicated po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t l<strong>in</strong>ks (upl<strong>in</strong>ks). IP traffic<br />

stemm<strong>in</strong>g from all CMNs is received by the broadcast<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t, where a process unit filters, regenerates and<br />

multiplexes them <strong>in</strong>to a s<strong>in</strong>gle transport stream (IP-multiplex) along with digital TV programme(s), stemm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from the TV broadcaster(s), form<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>al DVB-T "bouquet". The regenerated/ comb<strong>in</strong>ed traffic is then<br />

broadcasted via the UHF channel at high data rates follow<strong>in</strong>g the DVB-T standard.


Page 68 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 24: Sytem architecture for the ATHENA project, address<strong>in</strong>g DVB-T technology<br />

as a solution for broadband for all concept


7.2.9 HAP<br />

7.2.9.1 Introduction<br />

Page 69 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

High altitude platforms (HAPs) have the potential to cost effectively deliver broadband services. A HAP is an<br />

airship or plane which operates 17-20km above the earth’s surface and provides a platform for communications.<br />

HAPs are planned to provide high capacity to users (as with terrestrial networks), but provide a high coverage<br />

(as with satellite systems). The CAPANINA project 24 <strong>in</strong>tends to demonstrate systems capable of provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wireless bursts of data to users of up to 120Mbit/s to approximately 1000X the number of users per unit area<br />

serviced by satellite systems. The cost is eventually expected to be <strong>in</strong> the region of 10% of that of a satellite<br />

system and the low amount of <strong>in</strong>frastructure coupled with its potential amortisation across 1000s of users will<br />

also make these systems cost competitive with terrestrial systems.<br />

In the first <strong>in</strong>stance it is expected that the services will be available to geographically fixed users. Developments<br />

will rapidly allow access by mobile users travell<strong>in</strong>g at 100s km/hr e.g. on tra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

The wide coverage is coupled with a low <strong>in</strong>frastructure cost, will enable cost effective provision<strong>in</strong>g for remote<br />

and rural areas. Wireless remote sens<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. of atmospheric CO2 conditions) will be possible, as will<br />

navigation and surveillance applications.<br />

Dynamic provision<strong>in</strong>g of services and bandwidth is an important facet and will allow novel uses, such as<br />

disaster relief communications provision. Expectations are that HAPs will be communicat<strong>in</strong>g with fixed users <strong>in</strong><br />

the 3 to 5 year time period, and to mobile users about 2 years after that.<br />

7.2.9.2 Platforms<br />

The HAP will be a solar powered airship, or plane operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the stratosphere 17-20 km above the earth’s<br />

surface. The platform will be quasi-stationary. An airship will be located with<strong>in</strong> a cube of side 1 km. A plane<br />

will orbit a fixed po<strong>in</strong>t us<strong>in</strong>g a radius of 1-3 km.<br />

The platforms will be unmanned, but unlike satellites may be returned to earth for periodic ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. Thus<br />

the reliability constra<strong>in</strong>ts (and costs) on components may be less str<strong>in</strong>gent than those for satellites <strong>in</strong> orbit.<br />

Figure 25: L<strong>in</strong>e of sight coverage of a 20 km HAP situated over London 25<br />

24 http://www.capan<strong>in</strong>a.org/ - most <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> this report is gathered from this web-site<br />

25 http://www.capan<strong>in</strong>a.org/CAPANINA-Overview.pps


Page 70 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The 17-20km altitude will allow a wide coverage area e.g. Figure 25 shows the l<strong>in</strong>e of sight radius of coverage<br />

of a HAP situated 20km over London is greater than the distance to Land’s End (total ~500km).<br />

Some developers are also propos<strong>in</strong>g the use of tethered balloons as platforms. Although these are not strictly<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g high altitude, the technology is similar and should be considered as an alternative method. The<br />

discussion available implies that this may be an <strong>in</strong>terim step which is realisable <strong>in</strong> a shorter term than the<br />

stratospheric solution.<br />

The environment <strong>in</strong> the stratosphere will have impact on the requirements of the payloads. As an example of this<br />

the Capan<strong>in</strong>a-project is pay<strong>in</strong>g attention to avoid<strong>in</strong>g discharge <strong>in</strong> rf antennas, caused by low air pressures.<br />

Similarly, the thermal design of the payload must take <strong>in</strong>to account the low air temperatures and wide variations<br />

<strong>in</strong> solar radiation from one side of the payload to another.<br />

For the HAP solution, the predictable challenges <strong>in</strong>clude power supply budget<strong>in</strong>g and unmanned navigation<br />

(ascent, station ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and descent):<br />

• Although solar powered platforms are <strong>in</strong>tended for long term deployment, early trials for short term<br />

deployment may <strong>in</strong>volve a platform tak<strong>in</strong>g up its own power supply. Although a stepp<strong>in</strong>g stone, this<br />

solution may have some practical applications such as short term (~1 month) deployment for disaster<br />

recovery communications. S<strong>in</strong>ce the power supply is required both for flight/station keep<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

payload purposes, power budget<strong>in</strong>g needs to take a holistic view.<br />

• Although unmanned flight/station keep<strong>in</strong>g has been demonstrated, there have been several mishaps26 .<br />

These are considered to be learn<strong>in</strong>g opportunities, but are expensive <strong>in</strong> terms of lost resources.<br />

7.2.9.3 Connections<br />

Figure 26: Vision of HAP connections 27<br />

Figure 26 shows the predicted connections for a HAP. A variety of beams will be available from the earth fac<strong>in</strong>g<br />

antennas. For broadcast services such as HDTV low ga<strong>in</strong>, low directivity antennas will be employed to provide<br />

maximum coverage. Medium ga<strong>in</strong> antennas will be employed to provide bi-directional broadband fixed wireless<br />

26<br />

Del Frate J.H.: "Develop<strong>in</strong>g Technologies for High Altitude and Long Endurance", 5th Stratospheric Platform Systems Workshop,<br />

Tokyo, Japan, Feb 23-24, 2005<br />

27<br />

http://www.capan<strong>in</strong>a.org/CAPANINA-Overview.pps


Page 71 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

access cells for fixed users. Steer-able high ga<strong>in</strong> antennas will allow dynamic allocation of large capacity for<br />

purposes such as emergency communications dur<strong>in</strong>g a disaster, and will also service high speed mobile users.<br />

mm-Wave are expected for platform to user connections. As well as broadcast, these may provide burst data<br />

connections of up to 120 Mbit/s. Free-space optical communications, allow higher capacity (622 Mbit/s) <strong>in</strong> clear<br />

conditions and will be used for <strong>in</strong>ter-HAP communications and to supplement mm platform to ground backhaul<br />

communications.<br />

Connections to satellites and ground based hubs for back haul purposes will be provided. Inter-HAP connections<br />

will reduce the demand for terrestrial backbone network capacity and will also allow migration of highbandwidth<br />

optical connections to the ground from l<strong>in</strong>ks which are obscured by ra<strong>in</strong> or clouds to l<strong>in</strong>ks with clear<br />

weather. The lack of clouds at stratospheric altitudes prevents <strong>in</strong>ter-HAP optical connections from be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

obscured.<br />

Some of the major technological challenges here are the development of the steerable antennas and the ability to<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t acquire and track the l<strong>in</strong>ks both for optical and mm-wave transmission. The likely solutions appear to be a<br />

mixture of mechanical and phase array techniques.<br />

7.2.9.4 Roadmap<br />

Dr David Grace of CAPANINA has projected the follow<strong>in</strong>g timel<strong>in</strong>e for deployment:<br />

Near Term<br />

Suitable platforms are already developed such as NASA’s pathf<strong>in</strong>der plus aircraft. The <strong>in</strong>itial deployments are<br />

expected to be temporary (>2Mbit/s to each <strong>in</strong>dividual.<br />

This is the application which is requires most progress to be realised. The ma<strong>in</strong> developments to be made here<br />

are to do with track<strong>in</strong>g antennas. Other issues which need to be solved are the Doppler shifts of the signal and<br />

mitigation of obstructions (tunnels etc) and potential multipath fad<strong>in</strong>g. Various methods might be used to solve<br />

these. For example with broadcast the tra<strong>in</strong> may cache enough data for a tunnel passage. For <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

communications the HAP might talk to a fixed receiver which then uses WiFi to re-broadcast along the tunnel.<br />

Dr Grace believes that the HAPs would <strong>in</strong>tegrate with other transmission methods. For example, <strong>in</strong> large cities<br />

like London the tra<strong>in</strong>s may receive their signals from ground based transmitters whereas when the tra<strong>in</strong> left the<br />

city the HAP may take over. In this case handover strategies would be necessary.<br />

28 D. Grace, J. Thornton, G. Chen, G.P. White, T.C. Tozer, Improv<strong>in</strong>g the System capacity of Broadband Services Us<strong>in</strong>g Multiple High<br />

Altitude Platforms, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, To appear, Spr<strong>in</strong>g 2005


7.3 GENERAL TOPICS IN ACCESS<br />

7.3.1 Convergence <strong>in</strong> networks and services<br />

7.3.1.1 Seamless mobility Introduction<br />

Page 72 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Seamless mobility is expected to be achieved through IP- based networks that support portability for seamless<br />

<strong>in</strong>teroperation across converged networks work<strong>in</strong>g across wireless, mobile, fixed and satellite communication<br />

networks. The technologies of WLAN, Mobile networks and various fixed network technologies are covered <strong>in</strong><br />

the previous sections of this document. In this section, the service aspects are considered assum<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

deployment of various access technologies deployed.<br />

7.3.1.2 State of the Art / Exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies<br />

7.3.1.2.1 WLAN Services<br />

Through deployment of WLAN service, users can be provided with the same level of multimedia service <strong>in</strong> a<br />

wireless environment as they have been provided <strong>in</strong> a wired environment. However, despite its high data<br />

transmission rate and low price, WLAN service can be provided only <strong>in</strong> a limited coverage. So the possibility<br />

that the user will be provided with the data service like the Internet at any time and anywhere is limited.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g service cont<strong>in</strong>uity through mutual <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g between mobile and WLAN systems is<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g towards the evolution to all-IP networks <strong>in</strong> mobile communication to enable the services that can<br />

operate <strong>in</strong> different networks.<br />

7.3.1.2.2 Horizontal and vertical mobility<br />

A multimedia service that provides voice, data, and images services through wired, wireless and satellite<br />

environment and a global roam<strong>in</strong>g service that can transmit all over the world are the concepts beh<strong>in</strong>d the 3G<br />

mobile communication system. The future broadband mobile communication system aims to achieve a seamless<br />

global roam<strong>in</strong>g service through <strong>in</strong>ter-system handover (vertical handover) designed to enable handover between<br />

different technological systems and different bandwidth frequencies<br />

One of the biggest problems <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g wireless service to fast mov<strong>in</strong>g subscribers is service cont<strong>in</strong>uity.<br />

Unlike the 3G mobile communication developed to date, future broadband mobile communications set the goal<br />

of ensur<strong>in</strong>g high frequency efficiency and high transmission rate to a mov<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>al provid<strong>in</strong>g various types<br />

of QoS, etc. The development of future broadband mobile communications is expected to centre around the<br />

micro/pico cell.<br />

In the exist<strong>in</strong>g mobile communications system, transmission of voice traffic is most important. Therefore,<br />

services are provided on the basis of protocols for voice calls, and the handover technology is limited to<br />

handovers between cells or between mobile switch<strong>in</strong>g centres (MSC). However, as the demand for data traffic<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases and connections to the wired network server for the World Wide Web (WWW) or FTP service become<br />

more frequent, not only is handover between cells and between MSCs needed, but so is mobility <strong>in</strong> the upper<br />

layer. In addition, because all systems on the mobile communications network are mov<strong>in</strong>g to an ALL-IP or pure-<br />

IP structure, mobility <strong>in</strong> the IP layer and handover have become a major issue requir<strong>in</strong>g consideration.<br />

The Internet Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Task Force (IETF) has def<strong>in</strong>ed mobile IP to support host mobility. Us<strong>in</strong>g the concepts<br />

of home agent (HA) and care-of address (CoA), it enables a packet <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g to a mov<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>al to be<br />

transferred to CoA via HA through tunnel<strong>in</strong>g. Further enhancements are be<strong>in</strong>g discussed <strong>in</strong> IETF to improve the<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>g and security with Mobile-IPv6.<br />

To support mobility of the term<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong> an IP network, the most easy and hierarchical method is to provide<br />

transparent handover to the upper layer us<strong>in</strong>g Mobile IP that supports mobility <strong>in</strong> the IP layer.<br />

7.3.1.2.3 Broadband mobile convergence network<br />

With 3G networks, connectivity of up to 2 Mbit/s, term<strong>in</strong>al mobility and multimedia services can be<br />

provisioned. Mobile operators and application developers are cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to seek new applications and services<br />

that could generate additional revenues and <strong>in</strong>crease usage. The vision of future mobile networks <strong>in</strong> the<br />

converg<strong>in</strong>g environment will be the provision of broadband access, seamless global roam<strong>in</strong>g, widely available<br />

multimedia, and utilization of the most appropriate connectivity technology.


7.3.1.3 Socio Economic Issues<br />

Page 73 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The convergent networks lead to the provision of seamless and ubiquitous services, which is the fundamental<br />

requirement of <strong>in</strong>formation society. The ubiquitous services have lead to the ambient <strong>in</strong>telligence concept that is<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g promoted currently by <strong>FP6</strong> European research framework. The ubiquitous services can be very well<br />

exploited by the citizens to improve their quality of life and can contribute significantly to productivity and<br />

hence competitiveness, which contributes to general economic growth which is the primary of concern of all<br />

societies.<br />

There is a common vision of the <strong>in</strong>formation society, which <strong>in</strong>cludes that “everyone can create, access, utilize<br />

and share <strong>in</strong>formation and knowledge”. Even <strong>in</strong> remote places <strong>in</strong> Africa it is today possible to talk to other parts<br />

of the world through wireless networks. The dynamic development of new <strong>in</strong>formation and communication<br />

technologies is thus contribut<strong>in</strong>g to narrow<strong>in</strong>g the gap between the haves and the have-nots <strong>in</strong> the emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

knowledge economy, where the digital access to knowledge has become a central factor <strong>in</strong> the quality of life.<br />

Ubiquitous services and applications across convergent networks are beneficial and a user need <strong>in</strong> all<br />

circumstances. In fact, ubiquity leads to a de-facto blurr<strong>in</strong>g of work/home boundaries. The vision of the future<br />

has also been developed <strong>in</strong> particular ways by <strong>IST</strong>AG (Information Society Technologies Advisory Group) and<br />

WWRF (Wireless World Research Forum) scenarios. Exist<strong>in</strong>g telecommut<strong>in</strong>g technologies such as laptops and<br />

mobile phones with Internet capabilities, and remote access to office servers, already form the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of an<br />

era of ubiquitous services and applications. Ubiquitous services <strong>in</strong>volve convergence of three technologies:<br />

ubiquitous comput<strong>in</strong>g, ubiquitous communication, and <strong>in</strong>telligent user-friendly <strong>in</strong>terfaces. Seamless service<br />

provisions will create some tremendous bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities and challenges to telecommunications operators<br />

and service providers, with the need to consider value cha<strong>in</strong>s, market dynamics and how portable devices can be<br />

usefully <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to user centric service offer<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

7.3.1.4 Issues and Trends<br />

From the service perspective, mobile network architecture will become flexible and versatile, and new services<br />

will be easy to deploy. The new architecture would be based <strong>in</strong> IP-based core network components that are<br />

access technology <strong>in</strong>dependent, and access network components which are technology dependent, consist<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

functional components such as control functions and transport functions.<br />

The next-generation convergence network <strong>in</strong>corporates the provision of a common, unified, and flexible service<br />

architecture that can support multiple types of services and management applications over multiple types of<br />

transport networks. There are essential attributes of this next-generation service architecture such as layered<br />

architecture, open service <strong>in</strong>terface, and distributed network <strong>in</strong>telligence. It has characteristics such as open<br />

network architecture for ease of deploy<strong>in</strong>g new services; All-IP based <strong>in</strong>tegrated transport networks, <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

services and bill<strong>in</strong>g management, heterogeneous access network and multi-function term<strong>in</strong>als.<br />

Figure 27: Convergence Network scenario


Page 74 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.3.1.4.1 Gap analysis, Interwork<strong>in</strong>g and Interoperability<br />

The future broadband mobile communications requires <strong>in</strong>teroperation not only with WPANs or WLANs, but<br />

also with the 2G or 3G mobile communication system. Interoperability means the availability of well-def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

gateway po<strong>in</strong>ts and functions between networks. Interoperability is a key technical issue to ensure widespread<br />

adoption of services. From the perspective of system <strong>in</strong>teroperability, the future mobile network will be required<br />

to support global standards such as standardized <strong>in</strong>terfaces between networks, effective and user-friendly<br />

operation, adm<strong>in</strong>istration, ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and provision<strong>in</strong>g (OAM&P) facilities, and backward compatibility with<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g legacy mobile networks.<br />

Next-generation broadband mobile communications, beyond 3G (4th generation) will be able to provide diverse<br />

multimedia convergence and ubiquitous service. The new generation of mobile multimedia applications <strong>in</strong> IP<br />

environments will provide synergy between the mobile world and the Internet.<br />

The WWRF is driv<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle open mobile wireless Internet architecture that enables seamless <strong>in</strong>tegration of<br />

mobile telephony and Internet services, meet<strong>in</strong>g the needs of network operators and Internet service providers.<br />

Although IP is widely accepted protocol, it still weaknesses, like limited address space, lack of mobility and<br />

QoS mechanisms, and poor performance over wireless l<strong>in</strong>ks. IPv6 movement for a next-generation may resolve<br />

some of these problems.<br />

Cellular network operators are <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g WLAN <strong>in</strong>to their cellular data networks to exploit the bandwidth and<br />

roam<strong>in</strong>g facilities, <strong>in</strong> provision<strong>in</strong>g the cost-effective seamless services.<br />

7.3.1.4.2 Digital Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g Networks<br />

Convergence of communications and broadcast<strong>in</strong>g occurs as demarcation between these services becomes<br />

obscure. Cooperation of mobile network operators with the broadcast<strong>in</strong>g network will open up new applications<br />

such as navigation, traffic <strong>in</strong>formation, and <strong>in</strong>teractive multimedia services. A performance improvement by the<br />

broadband mobile convergence network will create the basis for provid<strong>in</strong>g various multimedia contents <strong>in</strong> the<br />

future and lay the groundwork <strong>in</strong> advance for a converged mobile communications broadcast<strong>in</strong>g service. The<br />

convergence technology is also able to show the <strong>in</strong>teractive data broadcast<strong>in</strong>g service <strong>in</strong> terrestrial and satellite<br />

DMB systems. It is suitable to transmit enterta<strong>in</strong>ment and <strong>in</strong>formation programmes as well as traffic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

and events <strong>in</strong>to cars, buses or tra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

7.3.1.4.3 Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks<br />

Ubiquitous comput<strong>in</strong>g can be realized with the mobile ad hoc networks, which are be<strong>in</strong>g experimented<br />

currently. A mobile ad hoc network does not <strong>in</strong>volve the use of exist<strong>in</strong>g networks, and it can be constructed<br />

even <strong>in</strong> extraord<strong>in</strong>ary conditions like a disaster. In a mobile ad hoc network, nodes communicate with each other<br />

without the help of any pre-exist<strong>in</strong>g structure. The network is autonomously formed among many nodes such as<br />

PDA, laptops with vary<strong>in</strong>g functionalities and power levels. It will be the enabler for ubiquitous comput<strong>in</strong>g as<br />

well as perform significant functions dur<strong>in</strong>g natural disasters where pre- exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure may be<br />

destroyed. The most representative ad hoc network is the multi-hop mobile ad hoc network based on IP<br />

(MANET) that is be<strong>in</strong>g standardized by IETF. The most conspicuous features of the mobile ad hoc network are<br />

dynamic network topology change associated with node mobility, which directly affects the rout<strong>in</strong>g protocol that<br />

manages the routes.<br />

7.3.1.5 Roadmap<br />

In general, there is a movement towards <strong>in</strong>tegration and convergence of heterogeneous wireless access<br />

networks. This <strong>in</strong>cludes cellular network but also emerg<strong>in</strong>g systems, such as WLAN, WPAN, wireless sensor<br />

networks (WSN), mobile ad-hoc networks, digital broadcast<strong>in</strong>g networks, and the Internet, which will<br />

complement or expand current and next-generation cellular networks. It is envisioned that the network<br />

environment for future broadband mobile communications will consist of an IP-based packet network<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure offer<strong>in</strong>g converged services.<br />

The convergence can ultimately provide seamless and high-quality broadband mobile communication service<br />

and ubiquitous service through wired and wireless convergence networks without spatial and temporal<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts, by means of connectivity for anybody and anyth<strong>in</strong>g, anytime and anywhere.<br />

Various mobile wireless access systems will coexist to provide <strong>in</strong>tegrated services. Satellite, cellular, WLAN,<br />

digital broadcast, and other access systems will be connected to provide <strong>in</strong>tegrated and seamless services via a<br />

common IP-based core network.


Page 75 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 28: Evolution of seamless services across heterogeneous Networks<br />

Research centres such as the Wireless World Research Forum (WWRF) 29 are work<strong>in</strong>g on the direction of future<br />

strategic research <strong>in</strong> the wireless fields, and to generate, identify, and promote research topics and technical<br />

trends for mobile wireless system technologies. It is thus <strong>in</strong>tended to contribute to the work done with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

UMTS forum, ETSI, 3GPPx, IETF, ITU and other relevant bodies <strong>in</strong> relation to commercial and standardization<br />

issues deriv<strong>in</strong>g from the research.<br />

7.3.1.6 More <strong>in</strong>formation:<br />

• ITU-R; Broadband Mobile Communications towards a converged world, March. 2004<br />

• P. S. Henry, “Wi-Fi: What’s Next?”, IEEE Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e December 2002.<br />

• Theodore Zahariadis and Demetrios Kazakos, “(R)Evolution toward 4G Mobile Communication<br />

Systems”, IEEE Wireless Communications, August 2003.<br />

• Yungsoo Kim et al: “Beyond 3G: Vision, Requirements, and Enabl<strong>in</strong>g Technologies”, IEEE<br />

Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, March 2003.<br />

• Willie W. Lu, “Fourth-Generation Mobile Initiatives and Technologies”, IEEE Communications<br />

Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, March 2002.<br />

• Theodore B.et al, “Global Roam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Next-Generation Networks”, IEEE Communications Manag<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

Next-Generation Broadband Wireless Networks and Navigation Services, Februrary 2002.<br />

• http://www.3gpp.org.<br />

29 http://www.wwrf.org


7.3.2 Video and Broadband networks<br />

7.3.2.1 Introduction<br />

Page 76 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Because of its connectionless and stateless nature, guarantee<strong>in</strong>g QoS <strong>in</strong> all-IP networks is a complex issue.<br />

Architectures for support<strong>in</strong>g QoS <strong>in</strong> packet networks <strong>in</strong>clude a set of complementary mechanisms often<br />

clustered <strong>in</strong> three logical planes (control, data and management planes) distributed across different layers of<br />

communication architectures. This document focuses on state-of-the-art functions and technologies, on issues<br />

and trends for build<strong>in</strong>g broadband QoS aware multimedia systems and for quality of service (QoS) support <strong>in</strong><br />

all-IP networks.<br />

7.3.2.2 State of the art / exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g standards)<br />

7.3.2.2.1 Data plane mechanisms<br />

Cod<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

The emergence of the Internet, of mobile applications over narrowband networks has given the impulse for<br />

pursu<strong>in</strong>g standardization of audio-visual compression solutions beyond MPEG-2, and giv<strong>in</strong>g rise to MPEG-4<br />

version 1 <strong>in</strong> 1999, version 2 <strong>in</strong> 2000 and more recently to MPEG-4 part 10 known also as H.264, which is a<br />

result of a jo<strong>in</strong>t effort between ISO and ITU. The performance gap of H.264 with respect to MPEG-4 versions 1<br />

and 2 is such that it is likely to impose itself on the market for all applications <strong>in</strong> need of compression efficiency.<br />

Transport protocols:<br />

Interactivity requirements preclud<strong>in</strong>g the usage of TCP, UDP and RTP have become the protocols of choice for<br />

the transport of multimedia cont<strong>in</strong>uous streams on the Internet. They are widely used <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g products for<br />

multimedia transport (see Apple’s quicktime stream<strong>in</strong>g server, Microsoft w<strong>in</strong>dows media server, Real networks<br />

helix universal server, etc… ). Multimedia stream<strong>in</strong>g over RTP/UDP has been also widely <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> part<br />

<strong>IST</strong> FP5 projects and is be<strong>in</strong>g reta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>itiatives such as ISMA (Internet Stream<strong>in</strong>g Media Alliance).<br />

QoS mechanisms <strong>in</strong> the application layer:<br />

The application-layer mechanisms are <strong>in</strong>tended to adapt –dynamically- the flow to the network characteristics,<br />

which may vary <strong>in</strong> time. The delivery of multimedia streams, due to their real-time nature, cannot make use of<br />

responsive and reliable protocols such as TCP. For this reason, so far, they had to make use of unresponsive<br />

transport protocols, e.g., User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and/or Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP). The fact<br />

that these protocols do not embed any congestion control mechanism raises major concerns: not only multimedia<br />

sessions such as video sessions require more bandwidth, but they are also unresponsive, i.e., they do not back<br />

off their rate when congestion occurs as TCP does. First, fair share of the network resources is no longer<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. Second, as more and more greedy sessions are established across the network, the goodput of the<br />

network decreases because unresponsive sessions typically send data packets at full rate even if these packets are<br />

later dropped <strong>in</strong>side the network. While the first po<strong>in</strong>t is a threat to TCP-based applications, the second one may<br />

potentially lead to network collapse.<br />

To cope with the above issues, it has been envisaged to enhance UDP-based video communications with some<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d of congestion control. Congestion control strategies dedicated to cont<strong>in</strong>uous streams, which reflect at best<br />

multimedia QoS requirements, yet at the same time be almost sufficiently reactive <strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> some<br />

fairness between traditional data exchanges and multimedia sessions have been designed. The goal of congestion<br />

control implemented <strong>in</strong> the application layer (e.g., at the level of the stream<strong>in</strong>g functions) is thus to avoid a<br />

possible network collapse and m<strong>in</strong>imize the impact of the network impairments on the quality of the received<br />

signal. Experiments have already shed light on the benefits of such adaptation mechanisms. By handl<strong>in</strong>g delay<br />

jitter (delay adaptation), packet loss (forward error correction, error concealment), and variable source rate<br />

availability, Congestion control, rate control, forward error correction, schedul<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the application layer<br />

allow to improve the quality of multimedia communications over best-effort networks. They can be regarded as<br />

complementary solutions to the problem of optimum stream adaptation to network vary<strong>in</strong>g bandwidth, loss rate<br />

or delay characteristics.<br />

Congestion control is used mostly so far with multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g techniques <strong>in</strong> stream<strong>in</strong>g servers. The<br />

multimedia content is pre-encoded at a selection of bit rates. The different streams are stored on the stream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

server. In stream<strong>in</strong>g solutions support<strong>in</strong>g multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g, the stream<strong>in</strong>g server automatically detects the<br />

user’s Internet connection speed, e.g., us<strong>in</strong>g bandwidth prediction techniques described <strong>in</strong> the above section, and<br />

suitably adapts on the fly the bit rate, hence the quality of the media stream, by select<strong>in</strong>g the appropriate encoded


Page 77 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

stream. Multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g is implemented e.g., <strong>in</strong> the Microsoft w<strong>in</strong>dows media server and <strong>in</strong> the SureStream<br />

technology of the RealNetwork Helix media server.<br />

Some stream<strong>in</strong>g media products:<br />

The most widely adopted stream<strong>in</strong>g media products are:<br />

• Apple’s QuickTime Server<br />

(http://www.apple.com/quicktime/products/qtss/). QTSS facilitates live broadcast<strong>in</strong>g, simulated live, as<br />

well as end-to-end on-demand stream<strong>in</strong>g, with QuickTime and MPEG-4 media formats, delivery over<br />

RTP, stream<strong>in</strong>g control with RTSP, RTP/RTSP tunnell<strong>in</strong>g over HTTP, fast start delivery over HTTP<br />

which is a type of pre-fetch<strong>in</strong>g to be used jo<strong>in</strong>tly with appropriate buffer management and playback on<br />

the client side; It also supports stream relay functionality.<br />

• Microsoft’s Media Services<br />

Complete end-to-end multimedia system <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g encoders, video-stream<strong>in</strong>g servers and multimedia<br />

players. The protocols supported are UDP, <strong>in</strong> Unicast and Multicast, RTP/RTCP, RTSP, and<br />

HTTP/TCP. It supports its own encoder and video-audio file format (W<strong>in</strong>dows Media Format). Its<br />

encoder is based on the MPEG-4 standards, however not compatible to MPEG-4. It also supports<br />

Multi-rate encod<strong>in</strong>g and correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>telligent stream<strong>in</strong>g. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the network state<br />

(congestion state, bandwidth), the server decides which bit rate to stream. It also supports stream<br />

th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g: This is a process that elim<strong>in</strong>ates video frames from a video feed <strong>in</strong> order to protect the audio<br />

feed.<br />

• RealNetworks’ Helix Universal Server<br />

(http://service.real.com/help/library/guides/helixuniversalserver/realsrvr.htm). The server is capable of<br />

live and on-demand content delivery of most major file formats, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g RealMedia, W<strong>in</strong>dows<br />

Media, QuickTime and MPEG-4. It supports UDP, TCP, RTP, IP-multicast, the MMS (Microsoft<br />

proprietary) protocol, RTSP, PNA (Realnetworks proprietary protocol); It supports Microsoft’s<br />

Multiple Bit Rate (MBR) encod<strong>in</strong>g technology. Encoder, transmitter, receiver support the relay<br />

functionality; It also <strong>in</strong>corporates SureStream technology that allows to detect changes <strong>in</strong> the bandwidth<br />

or packet loss conditions and to translate these changes <strong>in</strong>to stream switch<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• PacketVideo<br />

(http://www.packetvideo.com/) develops solutions for transmitt<strong>in</strong>g multimedia streams over wireless<br />

networks low bitrate (ma<strong>in</strong>ly Smartphones and PDAs). The lead<strong>in</strong>g product is pvServer. It supports<br />

MPEG-4 and W<strong>in</strong>dows Media formats. Players are available for most mobile devices under Symbian<br />

and Microsoft’s PocketPC. It supports RTP/RTCP, RTSP over UDP and HTTP, FastTrack,<br />

FrameTrack mechanisms.<br />

• Envivio<br />

(http://www.envivio.com/) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a collection of media delivery products. The 4Sight stream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

server is an MPEG-4 server conform<strong>in</strong>g to both ISO and ISMA standards. The software version is<br />

available for Microsoft W<strong>in</strong>dows, L<strong>in</strong>ux and Irix. End-user clients can use either the standalone<br />

EnvivioTV player or <strong>in</strong>stall the EnvivioTV plug-<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>to RealNetworks Player, W<strong>in</strong>dows Media Player<br />

or Apple’s QuickTime. Supported protocols are standard RTP/RTCP, RTSP over UDP<br />

(Unicast/Multicast) or through HTTP tunnell<strong>in</strong>g. The hardware version of Envivio’s stream<strong>in</strong>g server<br />

supports stream switch<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>cludes load-balanc<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms.<br />

• Dicas<br />

(http://www.mpegable.com/) specializes <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g MPEG-4 related products for the Microsoft<br />

W<strong>in</strong>dows platform. Its product l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>cludes an encoder, a stream<strong>in</strong>g server and a player. The Mpegable<br />

Broadcaster can take either live <strong>in</strong>put or any W<strong>in</strong>dows supported media format and output MPEG-4<br />

compliant streams. Protocols supported are RTP/RTCP, RTSP. Multicast is also supported.<br />

Integrated and differentiated services:<br />

Evolutions are tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> the network <strong>in</strong>frastructures, that should allow to better meet QoS requirements of<br />

multimedia applications. The IETF has def<strong>in</strong>ed two QoS architectures: the Integrated Services (IntServ) and<br />

the differentiated services (DiffServ).<br />

IntServ has been proposed by the IETF to reserve resources <strong>in</strong> advance, so that selected flows can be treated<br />

with guaranteed resources. The goal was <strong>in</strong> particular to enable real-time applications as well as bandwidth<br />

shar<strong>in</strong>g between different traffic classes. Two types of services have been def<strong>in</strong>ed for IntServ and can be<br />

requested via RSVP:


Page 78 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• Guaranteed Service: This service is <strong>in</strong>tended for real-time <strong>in</strong>tolerant applications. It offers a strict<br />

guaranteed service provid<strong>in</strong>g firm bounds on end-to-end delay, assured bandwidth for traffic<br />

conform<strong>in</strong>g to reserved specifications.<br />

• The second type is a controlled load service provid<strong>in</strong>g for a better than best-effort and low delay<br />

service under light to moderate network loads. It is <strong>in</strong>tended for applications that can tolerate a limited<br />

amount of losses and delay. The traffic parameters of importance are the average rate, peak rate and<br />

burst size. The end-to-end delay cannot be determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a determ<strong>in</strong>istic manner.<br />

The Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) has been designed as a signall<strong>in</strong>g protocol for sett<strong>in</strong>g the traffic<br />

parameters, i.e. for resource reservation and for admission control. The application must know the characteristics<br />

of its traffic beforehand. RSVP can then be used to signal the <strong>in</strong>termediate network elements the application<br />

traffic parameters.<br />

IntServ allows per-flow QoS but at the expense of per-flow state and signall<strong>in</strong>g at every hop. As a consequence,<br />

IntServ presents a certa<strong>in</strong> number limitations, among those a problem of scalability. The DiffServ architecture<br />

has been <strong>in</strong>troduced to solve the IntServ scalability problem. It def<strong>in</strong>es classes of services (CoS) correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to aggregates of flows. The key idea advocated by the DiffServ group of the IETF consists, by us<strong>in</strong>g a priority<br />

mechanism, <strong>in</strong> offer<strong>in</strong>g services with gradually <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g performances. In the DiffServ architecture, traffic is<br />

classified, metered and marked at the edge of the network. Traffic with similar QoS requirements is marked, by<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g the diffserv code po<strong>in</strong>t (DSCP) <strong>in</strong> the header of each IP packet, and is treated <strong>in</strong> an aggregated fashion <strong>in</strong><br />

the core routers. The DSCP specifies a per-hop behaviour (PHB) to be applied to the packets of a given class<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a provider’s network (<strong>in</strong> the core network). A PHB denotes a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of forward<strong>in</strong>g, classification,<br />

schedul<strong>in</strong>g, and drop behaviours at each hop. Two PHB’s have been standardized so far: the Expedited<br />

Forward<strong>in</strong>g (EF) PHB for support of delay and jitter sensitive traffic and the Assured Forward<strong>in</strong>g (AF) set of<br />

PHBs. The set of AF PHBs is <strong>in</strong>tended to provide different levels of forward<strong>in</strong>g assurances for IP packets at a<br />

node and to be used to support multiple priority service classes. Therefore, the core routers do not need to<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> per flow states, but use <strong>in</strong>stead schedul<strong>in</strong>g and buffer management for aggregates of flows. PHBs<br />

provide means for allocat<strong>in</strong>g buffer and bandwidth resources at each node among compet<strong>in</strong>g traffic.<br />

While DiffServ is ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g broad support to enable “soft” QoS through prioritization of process<strong>in</strong>g of traffic by<br />

service provider routers, MPLS is be<strong>in</strong>g deployed <strong>in</strong> service provider networks to enable delivery of a number of<br />

value-added services.<br />

MPLS – Multiprotocol label switch<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

The grow<strong>in</strong>g demand for bandwidth, and at the same time efficient bandwidth utilization and QoS support,<br />

requires also high performance switch<strong>in</strong>g and rout<strong>in</strong>g solutions. This motivated the design of simple forward<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g traffic management features of traditional switches with rout<strong>in</strong>g functions, exemplified by<br />

MPLS.<br />

MPLS is an IETF <strong>in</strong>itiative that aims at <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g Layer 2 <strong>in</strong>formation about network l<strong>in</strong>ks (bandwidth,<br />

latency, utilization) <strong>in</strong>to Layer 3 (IP) <strong>in</strong> order to simplify and improve IP-packet exchange. The goal is<br />

eventually to provide efficient switch<strong>in</strong>g and give flexibility to route traffic around l<strong>in</strong>k failures, congestion, and<br />

bottlenecks. From a QoS standpo<strong>in</strong>t, MPLS should allow to manage different k<strong>in</strong>ds of data streams based on<br />

priority and service plan. MPLS can be regarded as a technology forc<strong>in</strong>g application flows <strong>in</strong>to connectionoriented<br />

paths and provid<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms for traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and bandwidth guarantees. To enable traffic<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, MPLS must be comb<strong>in</strong>ed with technologies enabl<strong>in</strong>g class-specific treatment, (e.g. RSVP with<br />

tunnell<strong>in</strong>g extensions, DiffServ). A key advantage of MPLS is thus the close <strong>in</strong>tegration with the IP network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stack.<br />

Current trends consist <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Diffserv and MPLS as def<strong>in</strong>ed by the DiffServ-aware MPLS traffic<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g framework def<strong>in</strong>ed by the IETF (see <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2 below).<br />

7.3.2.2.2 Control plane mechanisms<br />

QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The implementation of QoS mechanisms require appropriate QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g protocols <strong>in</strong> different logical<br />

planes. QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g is a key component of an end-to-end QoS architecture. It is necessary to establish,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>, and remove reservation states <strong>in</strong> network nodes. The goal of QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g protocols is to provide<br />

packet-switched networks with a similar behaviour as <strong>in</strong> circuit-switched networks. The application must thus<br />

signal to the network the desired service, e.g. <strong>in</strong> terms of traffic profile, bandwidth and delay requirements.<br />

Some of these QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g protocols operate <strong>in</strong> conjunction with session management protocols, e.g., SIP,<br />

SAP, SDP, RTSP, H.323/H.245.


Page 79 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

QoS mechanisms <strong>in</strong> the network<br />

The routers today already support certa<strong>in</strong> QoS mechanisms such as congestion avoidance and congestion<br />

management.<br />

• Congestion Avoidance: Congestion avoidance mechanisms are <strong>in</strong>tended to anticipate and avoid<br />

congestion. The ma<strong>in</strong> strategies are tail drop and random early dropp<strong>in</strong>g (RED). Tail drop simply<br />

drops an <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g packet if the output queue for the packet is full, or enqueue the packet otherwise.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> disadvantage is possible TCP global back-up synchronization: Taildrop can drop packets<br />

from many hosts at the same time. A RED gateway detects congestion by monitor<strong>in</strong>g the average<br />

queue size and randomly discards packets if the average queue size exceeds some lower bound so as to<br />

notify connections of <strong>in</strong>cipient congestion. The dropp<strong>in</strong>g probability <strong>in</strong>creases with the average queue<br />

size. RED has been shown to successfully prevent global synchronisation, to reduce packets loss ratios<br />

for sufficient buffer size. A queue management algorithm called RIO - RED with IN and OUT – has<br />

been def<strong>in</strong>ed, as an extension of RED, <strong>in</strong> order to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate low priority (out-of-profile) packets<br />

from high priority (<strong>in</strong>-profile) packets <strong>in</strong> times of congestion. By support<strong>in</strong>g two RED algorithms with<br />

different levels of dropp<strong>in</strong>g probability, RIO allows to perform preferential dropp<strong>in</strong>g of out-of-profile<br />

packets over <strong>in</strong>-profile packets.<br />

• Congestion Management : Congestion management mechanisms are methods implemented <strong>in</strong> core<br />

routers <strong>in</strong> support of different classes of service. They <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

- the different queues assigned to the different classes of traffic<br />

- the algorithms for classify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g packets and assign<strong>in</strong>g them to the different queues.<br />

- Schedul<strong>in</strong>g packets out of the various queues and prepar<strong>in</strong>g them for transmission.<br />

RED is already used <strong>in</strong> routers to anticipate on possible congestion. Some congestion management mechanisms<br />

are already available on commercialized routers, however not fully exploited <strong>in</strong> deployed networks. In addition,<br />

extra network QoS mechanisms are under <strong>in</strong>vestigation (see section 2.2 below).<br />

7.3.2.2.3 Session and application level signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The first problem to be addressed <strong>in</strong> the design of multimedia systems is audio and video streams establishment<br />

and negotiation of QoS parameters. The IETF has def<strong>in</strong>ed the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) as a standard<br />

protocol used for session <strong>in</strong>itiation and for negotiat<strong>in</strong>g its parameters <strong>in</strong> the Internet. SIP is neither a session<br />

description protocol nor a resource reservation protocol. These functions are provided by other protocols such as<br />

SDP and RSVP respectively SIP is an application-layer transaction “request-response” protocol designed to<br />

establish, modify, term<strong>in</strong>ate Unicast and multicast multimedia (voice and video) sessions <strong>in</strong> an IP network for a<br />

large range of multimedia applications. The protocol has been specified by the MMUSIC WG as a proposed<br />

standard <strong>in</strong> 1999 (IETF RFC 2543) and was updated by the SIP WG <strong>in</strong> 2002 (IETF RFC 3261).<br />

A lot of effort has already been devoted to the <strong>in</strong>teraction of SIP with the QoS mechanisms <strong>in</strong> IP networks. This<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes SIP extensions (such as SDP (Session Description Protocol)), QoS extensions and resource reservation<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions with SIP) <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>in</strong>crease QoS <strong>in</strong> SIP-based networks. One characteristic of SIP that actually<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases QoS is the ability to <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>in</strong> a SIP INVITE, via SDP (the Session Description Protocol, text-based<br />

media description format allow<strong>in</strong>g to describe multimedia sessions), which codecs are supported before a<br />

session beg<strong>in</strong>s and the desired QoS.<br />

Possible SIP applications and usage scenarios are under <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong> the Session Initiation Proposal<br />

Investigation (SIPPING) WG. SIPPING describes the requirements for any extension to SIP (see Section 2.3).<br />

7.3.2.2.4 Content delivery networks and content adaptation<br />

Content delivery networks (CDN) also aim at provid<strong>in</strong>g added-value services, such as improved QoS, i.e., better<br />

performance <strong>in</strong> the sense of faster response time, more efficient bandwidth utilization through cach<strong>in</strong>g and/or<br />

replicat<strong>in</strong>g content. Better QoS support is assured via three ma<strong>in</strong> types of services: redirection services,<br />

distribution services, account<strong>in</strong>g services.<br />

A CDN can be regarded as an overlay network of strategically placed surrogate servers (or edge servers) built<br />

upon an IP network. The surrogate servers store the frequently requested content closer to the clients. CDN are<br />

deployed on behalf of the web site providers and can be hosted <strong>in</strong> networks of possibly different ISPs. The<br />

goals and benefits of CDNs are, by br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g the content near network edges, to reduce bandwidth consumption,<br />

network traffic <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g upstream bandwidth usage, congestion, response time, orig<strong>in</strong> server load, and to<br />

improve reliability <strong>in</strong> situations where the remote server may be unavailable. The content load is distributed<br />

among servers close to the clients. CDN thus allow improv<strong>in</strong>g web performance beyond proxy cach<strong>in</strong>g. CDN


Page 80 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

allow <strong>in</strong> addition access to content that is usually un-cacheable <strong>in</strong> classical cach<strong>in</strong>g proxies, such as secured<br />

content, stream<strong>in</strong>g content, or dynamic content. They thus contribute to br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g value-added applications at the<br />

edge of the network, i.e. at the backbone NAP (Network access po<strong>in</strong>t) or at the ISP POP (Po<strong>in</strong>t of Presence).<br />

Multimedia stream<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a CDN is a difficult problem due to the significant traffic and bandwidth consumption,<br />

the necessity for the CDN provider to ensure proper AAA for each client, and to guarantee quality for live video<br />

or VoD for each client, accord<strong>in</strong>g to his preferences and demands. Some current CDN service providers (listed<br />

below) already provide stream<strong>in</strong>g services, but there is yet a lot to be done on this field.<br />

• Adero (http://www.webvisions.com)<br />

• Akamai (http://www.akamai.com)<br />

• Mirror Image (http://www.mirror-image.com)<br />

• ActiVia Networks (http://www.activia.net)<br />

The trend is to evolve from cach<strong>in</strong>g and replication only to more added value services such as localized and<br />

personalized content, secure access, and content adaptation (see Section 2.4).<br />

7.3.2.3 Issues and trends<br />

7.3.2.3.1 Data plane mechanisms<br />

Cod<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g this large number of solutions, compression at low bit rates rema<strong>in</strong>s a widely sought capability<br />

for audiovisual communication over voice-band and wireless networks. However, even if compression rema<strong>in</strong>s a<br />

key issue, this is not the only one that has to be taken <strong>in</strong>to account. Scalability and error resilience for<br />

transmission <strong>in</strong> heterogeneous environments with non guaranteed delivery QoS have become important features<br />

of compression solutions for a large number of applications (see annex), even if scalability versus simulcast is<br />

still at the core of the debates <strong>in</strong> some standardization bodies (ISO). Multiple description cod<strong>in</strong>g and jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

source-channel cod<strong>in</strong>g are solutions under <strong>in</strong>vestigation to m<strong>in</strong>imize the impact of losses or errors on the quality<br />

of the reconstructed signal.<br />

3D <strong>in</strong>teractive TV transform<strong>in</strong>g TV watch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to an immersive <strong>in</strong>teractive experience with technology<br />

capitaliz<strong>in</strong>g on advances <strong>in</strong> Digital TV broadcast, 3D-visualisation, image process<strong>in</strong>g, and efficient<br />

communication of rich <strong>in</strong>teractive multimedia material has become an important target to create new revenues <strong>in</strong><br />

the broadband arena. Interactivity <strong>in</strong> this context is understood <strong>in</strong> the sense that the user can navigate with<strong>in</strong> real<br />

word audio-visual scenes and freely choose a viewpo<strong>in</strong>t and/or view direction.<br />

Transport protocols:<br />

The RTP/RTCP protocols now used for multimedia delivery offer no delivery guarantee and have no notion of<br />

connection. Unresponsive usage of these protocols gives rise to severe threats for the media QoS, as well as for<br />

the network QoS. As the number of unresponsive data flows <strong>in</strong>creases, congestion <strong>in</strong>side the network with its<br />

devastative effects on multimedia delivery and <strong>in</strong>teraction (large packet losses and end-to-end delays) becomes a<br />

major concern. This has motivated the <strong>in</strong>troduction of a large set of technologies specifically dedicated to the<br />

problem of optimum end-to-end QoS support, mostly proprietary.<br />

The desire to have a standardized way of support<strong>in</strong>g congestion control end-to-end has motivated recently the<br />

creation of a group with<strong>in</strong> the IETF called DCCP. The DCCP work<strong>in</strong>g group aims at def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a new protocol<br />

called DCCP (Datagram Congestion Control Protocol), comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g some of the features of UDP and TCP,<br />

offer<strong>in</strong>g a choice of congestion control mechanisms without mak<strong>in</strong>g use of some of the TCP features which are<br />

not compatible with delay constra<strong>in</strong>ts. DCCP is <strong>in</strong>tended for applications which have preference for delivery of<br />

timely data over <strong>in</strong>-order delivery or reliability. Many of the applications targeted by DCCP (e.g., stream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

multimedia) currently use RTP over UDP. DCCP is <strong>in</strong>tended to be a standard way to implement congestion<br />

control and congestion control negotiation. This protocol is <strong>in</strong>tended to be used by applications such as<br />

stream<strong>in</strong>g multimedia.<br />

In <strong>in</strong>frastructures with mobile and wireless access, QoS support requires <strong>in</strong> addition the delivery technologies to<br />

allow for high spectrum efficiency as well as robustness aga<strong>in</strong>st errors. This has led to the creation of the<br />

ROHC work<strong>in</strong>g group with<strong>in</strong> the IETF and to <strong>in</strong>itiatives such as UDP-Lite which should allow a more efficient<br />

bandwidth usage. The Robust Header Compression (ROHC) work<strong>in</strong>g group of the IETF addresses key<br />

requirements <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g and future mobile and wireless networks, namely spectrum efficiency and robustness<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st errors. The <strong>in</strong>centive arose from l<strong>in</strong>ks with significant error rates, long round-trip times, and bandwidth<br />

limited capacity. The goal was to design robust and efficient header compression based upon a flexible and


Page 81 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

extensible framework. The ROHC WG has developed a header compression framework on top of which<br />

various profiles can be def<strong>in</strong>ed for different protocol stacks, or for different compression strategies. UDP-lite is<br />

a lightweight version of UDP. UDP-lite provides <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility <strong>in</strong> the form of a partial and adaptable<br />

checksum.<br />

QoS mechanisms <strong>in</strong> the application layer:<br />

Congestion control can take different forms: one f<strong>in</strong>ds solutions rely<strong>in</strong>g on bandwidth prediction mechanisms,<br />

such as the TFRC algorithm now <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> DCCP. The bandwidth prediction must then be coupled with<br />

rate control performed either by a real-time encoder or by the stream<strong>in</strong>g server. In stream<strong>in</strong>g servers, so far,<br />

simple strategies such as multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g are generally considered (see e.g., the w<strong>in</strong>dows media server).<br />

Alternative solutions to multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g consist <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g use of a scalable representation of the<br />

multimedia signals. The specification of a scalable video cod<strong>in</strong>g standard is – at the time of writ<strong>in</strong>g - under<br />

progress with<strong>in</strong> ISO/MPEG-21.<br />

Mechanisms – complementary to congestion control - such as loss control with possibly retransmission<br />

schemes for delay tolerant applications, such as loss-resilient encod<strong>in</strong>g techniques, are also envisaged to reduce<br />

the impact of network congestion on the quality of the rendered signals. The transmission of encoded video and<br />

audio data over IP-based networks causes primarily packet erasures <strong>in</strong> current network architectures. Several<br />

techniques are <strong>in</strong> general considered to combat packet losses, i.e., to improve the apparent quality of the<br />

transmission: forward error/erasure correction, retransmissions schemes (e.g., ARQ - Automatic repeat Request -<br />

or a mixed of the two techniques, i.e., ARQ used <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with forward error/erasure correction), and<br />

<strong>in</strong>terleav<strong>in</strong>g. The latency that the application can tolerate is a key element <strong>in</strong> the choice of a loss control or<br />

repair technique. The efficiency of the loss control scheme depends on the tolerable latency.<br />

Solutions for rate-distortion optimized stream<strong>in</strong>g of media packets are also studied. The stream<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

decides which packet to transmit based on the packet deadl<strong>in</strong>e, the channel statistics, the feedback <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

the packets <strong>in</strong>ter-dependencies and the reduced distortion result<strong>in</strong>g from a correct reception and decod<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

packet. Optimized packet schedules can be computed at the sender, the receiver or at a proxy-server on the<br />

network edge. Buffer management on the receiver, by allow<strong>in</strong>g for local cach<strong>in</strong>g and playback, can also<br />

contribute to reduce the impact of network congestion on the quality of the rendered signals. Client side<br />

buffer<strong>in</strong>g coupled with <strong>in</strong>telligent pre-fetch<strong>in</strong>g and playback provides means to “absorb” network bandwidth<br />

vary<strong>in</strong>g conditions. Media data is buffered at the client to protect aga<strong>in</strong>st playout <strong>in</strong>terruptions due to packet<br />

losses and random delays. However, while the likelihood of an <strong>in</strong>terruption decreases as more data are buffered,<br />

the latency <strong>in</strong>creases. In today’s stream<strong>in</strong>g technologies, buffer<strong>in</strong>g delays often range from 5 to 15 seconds for a<br />

good balance between delay and playout reliability.<br />

The implementation of end-to-end congestion control <strong>in</strong> network <strong>in</strong>frastructures with wireless access requires a<br />

capability of differentiat<strong>in</strong>g losses due to network congestion from losses result<strong>in</strong>g from UDP or UDP-lite paket<br />

discard after error detection. This is known as a loss differentiation problem.<br />

Integrated and differentiated services:<br />

DiffServ is ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g broad support to enable “soft” QoS through prioritization of process<strong>in</strong>g of traffic by service<br />

provider routers. However, the implementation of IntServ and DiffServ QoS models further requires the<br />

specification of mark<strong>in</strong>g strategies, the deployment of active queue management, traffic classification and<br />

shap<strong>in</strong>g techniques as well as of schedul<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms <strong>in</strong> the network nodes. Note that these functions act<br />

directly upon the user data packets, hence can be classified as data logical plane functions.<br />

7.3.2.3.2 Control plane mechanisms<br />

The implementation of IntServ and DiffServ requires mechanisms of<br />

• admission control e.g. <strong>in</strong> the edge nodes, which will control the traffic admitted <strong>in</strong>to the network;<br />

• QoS rout<strong>in</strong>g that will select a path satisfy<strong>in</strong>g the flow QoS requirements; This can rely on forward<strong>in</strong>g<br />

methods comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g traffic management features of traditional switches with rout<strong>in</strong>g functions, as <strong>in</strong><br />

MPLS. Efficient bandwidth utilization and QoS support require also high performance switch<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>g solutions.<br />

• Resource reservation mechanisms.<br />

These mechanisms act upon the paths - and their associated resources - followed by the user data but not directly<br />

on the data itself, hence the name control plane functions. The control plane functions are usually driven by<br />

some policies. Policies can be regarded as a set of rules def<strong>in</strong>ed by the provider for manag<strong>in</strong>g and controll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

access to network resources. They may reflect an agreement between the provider and the customer, possibly


Page 82 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g QoS requirements. The policies implementation <strong>in</strong>volves also management functions such as traffic<br />

meter<strong>in</strong>g and service level agreements.<br />

QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

RSVP has been designed for QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an IntServ architecture and not for general-purpose signall<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

However, RSVP is known to suffer from excessive transport and process<strong>in</strong>g overhead, of some weaknesses <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of mobility. Extensions to RSVP have been def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> order to cope with these limitations and <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

meet requirements of other applications which also require state-establishment protocols.<br />

The problem of signall<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong> particular of QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g is currently be<strong>in</strong>g addressed by the IETF NSIS<br />

(Next Steps In Signall<strong>in</strong>g) work<strong>in</strong>g group. The NSIS group is <strong>in</strong> particular def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g requirements as well as an<br />

architecture and a next-generation signall<strong>in</strong>g protocol. the goal is “to develop a transport layer signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

protocol for the transport of upper layer signall<strong>in</strong>g” and when do<strong>in</strong>g so “to re-use, where appropriate, the<br />

protocol mechanisms of RSVP, while at the same time simplify<strong>in</strong>g it and apply<strong>in</strong>g a more general signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

model.” To allow for a more general signall<strong>in</strong>g protocol which could be used accommodate different services or<br />

resources, such as NAT & firewall traversal and QoS resources, a two layer model separat<strong>in</strong>g the signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transport from the application signall<strong>in</strong>g is considered. The general-purpose CASP (Cross-Application<br />

Signall<strong>in</strong>g Protocol) protocol has been proposed <strong>in</strong> this context to accommodate general signall<strong>in</strong>g applications.<br />

QoS mechanisms <strong>in</strong> the network<br />

In order to guarantee the different services, the network must implement a certa<strong>in</strong> number of functions such as<br />

congestion avoidance and congestion management already supported <strong>in</strong> IP routers and mentioned earlier. Full<br />

deployment of QoS strategies such as Intserv, Diffserv and MPLS also requires the development of policy<br />

management, admission control, traffic shap<strong>in</strong>g and traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g strategies and technologies.<br />

• Policy management and admission control: In IntServ, the policies to be applied to flows can be<br />

stored <strong>in</strong> directory or policy servers. When receiv<strong>in</strong>g a RSVP message, the RSVP module requests the<br />

LPM (Local Policy Module) for a decision to be taken for the request. The LPM is the module<br />

responsible for enforc<strong>in</strong>g policy driven admission control on any policy aware node. The LPM<br />

<strong>in</strong>teracts with a PEP (Policy Enforcement Po<strong>in</strong>t), which <strong>in</strong> turn contacts a PDP (Policy Decision Po<strong>in</strong>t)<br />

with a request for a policy decision on the packet and then sends the packet to the RSVP module. The<br />

PEP is a network device that is capable of enforc<strong>in</strong>g a policy. It may be <strong>in</strong>side the source or dest<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

or on any node <strong>in</strong> between. The logical entity which <strong>in</strong>terprets the policies perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to the RSVP<br />

requests & formulates a decision is called the PDP (Policy Decision Po<strong>in</strong>t). PDP and PEP communicate<br />

with a standard protocol called COPS (Common Open Policy Service). It is a request-response<br />

protocol which relies on TCP for reliable delivery, and possibly IPSec for security.<br />

• Traffic shap<strong>in</strong>g and polic<strong>in</strong>g: Edge routers perform traffic condition<strong>in</strong>g and assign the DSCPs on the<br />

basis of an SLA – Service Level Agreement – negotiated between the customer and the network<br />

provider. The classifier reads the DSCP and/or other field (source IP, dest<strong>in</strong>ation IP, source port,<br />

dest<strong>in</strong>ation port, etc.), selects and routes packets to a Traffic Conditioner (TC). The role of the traffic<br />

conditioner is to ensure that the flows are <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the SLA, by monitor<strong>in</strong>g the temporal traffic flow<br />

of each packet stream (meter) to see if it is with<strong>in</strong> the required profile and by trigger<strong>in</strong>g re-mark<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

dropp<strong>in</strong>g, or shap<strong>in</strong>g, if it is out of profile.<br />

• MPLS and traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g: MPLS together with constra<strong>in</strong>t-based rout<strong>in</strong>g can guarantee<br />

bandwidth for a forward<strong>in</strong>g equivalence class but does not support class-based treatment of flows (i.e,<br />

forward<strong>in</strong>g or discard<strong>in</strong>g and schedul<strong>in</strong>g). The DiffServ-aware MPLS traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g framework<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed by the IETF aims at comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these complementary technologies <strong>in</strong> the direction of QoSenabled<br />

networks. MPLS separates data forward<strong>in</strong>g from the control and signall<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms used<br />

for rout<strong>in</strong>g and label management. A variety of control and signall<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms can thus be<br />

considered for MPLS. The IETF has def<strong>in</strong>ed two signall<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms for establish<strong>in</strong>g LSPs <strong>in</strong> an<br />

MPLS environment: LDP with some extensions, and RSVP-TE. Improved QoS through use of<br />

mechanisms, such as DiffServ and MPLS, and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g control plane mechanisms, is a key<br />

factor beh<strong>in</strong>d the promise of broadband <strong>in</strong>teractive bus<strong>in</strong>ess-quality IP video.


Page 83 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.3.2.3.3 Session and application level signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

In order to provide complete services (e.g., IP telephony, IP videoconferenc<strong>in</strong>g, etc,…), SIP must be used <strong>in</strong><br />

conjunction with other IETF protocol standards, e.g.<br />

• with RSVP which will reserve the required network resources for a given targeted/negotiated QoS, or<br />

with the COPS (Common Open Policy Service) protocol for support<strong>in</strong>g policy control over QoS,<br />

• with RTP (Real Time Transport Protocol) for the transport of real time data,<br />

• with RTSP (Real Time Stream<strong>in</strong>g Protocol) for controll<strong>in</strong>g the delivery of stream<strong>in</strong>g media,<br />

• and with SAP (Session Advertisement Protocol) for advertis<strong>in</strong>g multimedia sessions via multicast.<br />

Different types of SIP-QoS architecture are under <strong>in</strong>vestigation, i.e.<br />

• either supported end-to-end with additional complexity on the term<strong>in</strong>als, the user application must be<br />

aware of the QoS mechanisms used <strong>in</strong> the access network and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g QoS signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

protocol (e.g. RSVP, COPS, or other),<br />

• or scenarios based on QoS aware SIP servers, i.e., which amounts to mov<strong>in</strong>g QoS related functions to<br />

SIP servers that will control both call setup and resource reservation, thus reliev<strong>in</strong>g the term<strong>in</strong>als from<br />

extra complexity.<br />

7.3.2.3.4 Content delivery networks and content adaptation<br />

The deployment of relay or cach<strong>in</strong>g media servers at the network edges is also among the mechanisms<br />

considered for avoid<strong>in</strong>g overload of the core network. Stream<strong>in</strong>g servers are thus positioned at the edge of the<br />

distribution network These proxy or cach<strong>in</strong>g servers can then fetch the requested media and serve it as if the<br />

content was locally available. This contributes to remov<strong>in</strong>g the load from the central server. The architecture of<br />

relay servers then implements what is commonly referred to as Application Layer Multicast, lead<strong>in</strong>g to overlay<br />

content delivery architectures.<br />

Content delivery networks (CDN) can be seen as overlay networks of content servers distributed geographically<br />

to enable the end-users to have rapid and reliable access to the content. CDNs use technologies such as cach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to place replicated content close to the network edges. Load balanc<strong>in</strong>g can then ensure that the users are<br />

transparently routed to the “best” server. Several practical CDN solutions already exist and are listed <strong>in</strong> Section<br />

1.4. The trend is also to evolve from cach<strong>in</strong>g and replication only to more added value services such as localized<br />

and personalized content, secure access, and content adaptation.<br />

To cope with the grow<strong>in</strong>g diversity and heterogeneity of networks, devices and content consumption, the<br />

content may need to go thru adaptation processes: transcod<strong>in</strong>g, scal<strong>in</strong>g, content adaptation to small devices, e.g.,<br />

like markup language transformation for wireless devices (PDAs, cell phones), content filter<strong>in</strong>g, personalization<br />

(e.g., human language translation, modality transformation), location-aware data <strong>in</strong>sertion, prioritisation, virus<br />

scann<strong>in</strong>g, ad <strong>in</strong>sertion.<br />

Content adaptation <strong>in</strong> open environments requires the def<strong>in</strong>ition of protocols, <strong>in</strong>terfaces and syntax and<br />

semantics for capability exchange, for specify<strong>in</strong>g the adaptation requested, feasible or allowed The MPEG-21<br />

standard and <strong>in</strong> particular MPEG-21 DIA is aim<strong>in</strong>g at “enabl<strong>in</strong>g universal multimedia access” with <strong>in</strong>teroperable<br />

and transparent access to MM content. The ICAP (Internet Content Adaptation Protocol) protocol is a po<strong>in</strong>t-topo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

protocol which has been designed <strong>in</strong> support of distribut<strong>in</strong>g the process<strong>in</strong>g load required for content<br />

adaptation among specialized application servers, actually dedicated servers. This <strong>in</strong> turn allows to scale up the<br />

web servers to meet the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand.<br />

Syntax and semantics to express user preferences and device capabilities have also to be specified. The<br />

specification of the correspond<strong>in</strong>g syntax and protocols is be<strong>in</strong>g done with<strong>in</strong> the IETF ConNeg work<strong>in</strong>g group.<br />

The IETF Content Negotiation work<strong>in</strong>g group has developed the “Media Feature Sets” standard to allow for<br />

protocol-<strong>in</strong>dependent content negotiation.


7.3.3 Physical access Architectures<br />

Page 84 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The network operators are faced with the need to provide a very high bit rate access to the subscriber, and a<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of voice data and video (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g multicast and broadcast services), Common issues arise when<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g the evolution of the different legacy access technologies (with the exception of FTTH):<br />

The po<strong>in</strong>t to po<strong>in</strong>t (XDSL) or po<strong>in</strong>t to multipo<strong>in</strong>t architectures are very centralised for historical, economical and<br />

operational reasons:<br />

• Cable, terrestrial and satellite architectures were orig<strong>in</strong>ally conceived for broadcast applications ma<strong>in</strong>ly,<br />

so there was no need for very decentralised architecture with high bit rate dedicated per subscriber;<br />

DSL architectures are based on POTS where a Central Office can feed a considerable number of<br />

subscriber, and support distances up to 5-6 km.<br />

• Obviously it is much more economical to reduce the number of locations were active/signal process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

equipment is present; moreover ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and network availability can be affected by the<br />

decentralisation of active equipment <strong>in</strong> the network.<br />

We can briefly mention the architectural challenges of the different <strong>in</strong>frastructures:<br />

On the XDSL part, current architectures are po<strong>in</strong>t to po<strong>in</strong>t directly from the central office to the subscriber, and<br />

the total capacity downstream and upstream are <strong>in</strong> the order to 1-2 Mbps downstream, and 256-500 kbps<br />

upstream for the maximum distances. Therefore even non real time video services cannot be delivered on a<br />

efficient way. 2 Basic k<strong>in</strong>ds of upgrades are possible, which require a FTTC/B architecture:<br />

• VDSL type of upgrade where the DSLAM function is pushed closer to the subscriber<br />

• To reduce the length of the copper wires by digitis<strong>in</strong>g and multiplex<strong>in</strong>g the downstream and upstream<br />

bands at the boundary po<strong>in</strong>t between copper and fiber <strong>in</strong> the FTTB/C architecture.<br />

Alternative solutions can be imag<strong>in</strong>ed, but they all require the upgrade to FTTB/C; The problems be<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

support the “broadcast video” bit rate requirement, as several video programs can be consulted simultaneously,<br />

and to provide the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g upstream traffic due to peer to peer applications, and the deployment of home<br />

servers.<br />

Other research areas is related to storage architectures, and multicast: <strong>in</strong> order to decrease the overall traffic,<br />

storage can be placed <strong>in</strong> different places <strong>in</strong> the network (CO, DSLAM, subscriber) and content or parts of a<br />

content can be multicast to different storage areas <strong>in</strong> the network.<br />

On the cable and wireless architectures the problems are similar: video broadcast and multicast can be delivered<br />

on a cost effective way, but the unicast traffic is creat<strong>in</strong>g a problem. The advantage of a po<strong>in</strong>t to multipo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

architecture is it ability to share the overall bandwidth per channel between the subscribers, tak<strong>in</strong>g advantage of<br />

statistical multiplex<strong>in</strong>g, and scarse bandwidth usage. The <strong>in</strong>troduction of video is significantly chang<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

average bit rate provisioned per subscriber, and therefore require significant architectural modifications, the<br />

alternatives be<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• To cont<strong>in</strong>ue to feed coaxial or wireless cells via transparent fiber l<strong>in</strong>ks, like it is done now, and split the<br />

coaxial or wireless cells<br />

• To digitise the fibre transport part of the network, and either decentralise the Access node part, or<br />

digitise the whole upstream and downstream bands.<br />

The same k<strong>in</strong>d of issues with storage and multicast exist like <strong>in</strong> XDSL, the difference be<strong>in</strong>g that multicast can be<br />

used up to the subscriber whereas multicast will stop at the DSLAM for XDSL.<br />

In summary a lot of common areas are to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated for the evolution of the different access architectures,<br />

common topics be<strong>in</strong>g the impact on the FTTC/B architectures, <strong>in</strong>vestigations of the different FTTX solutions,<br />

network reliability, impact on network operation, multicast architectures and signall<strong>in</strong>g, distributed storage<br />

architecture and related signall<strong>in</strong>g.


7.3.4 Signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Page 85 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

This section focuses on application level signal<strong>in</strong>g. It is likely that a variety of signal<strong>in</strong>g protocols will co-exist,<br />

based on either centralized or decentralized paradigms. Information required for actions like session set-up,<br />

release, control (<strong>in</strong> stream<strong>in</strong>g application), session description, and security <strong>in</strong>formation is conveyed by these<br />

protocols. Rather then standardiz<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle protocol, the issue is more to def<strong>in</strong>e a unique description for this<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, so that it can be conveyed between layers and network entities. Application level signal<strong>in</strong>g is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

some attention due to its ability to run on top of heterogeneous networks regardless of underly<strong>in</strong>g transport<br />

technologies.<br />

There are a number of options for application level signal<strong>in</strong>g, SIP, H.323 and MGCP be<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong> ones. These<br />

options are briefly considered <strong>in</strong> this section a long with a short <strong>in</strong>troduction to migrat<strong>in</strong>g IN and IP networks.<br />

7.3.4.1 SIP<br />

The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is an application-layer control signal<strong>in</strong>g protocol for creat<strong>in</strong>g, modify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and term<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g sessions with one or more participants. SIP has attracted a lot of attention because of its<br />

simplicity and ability to support rapid <strong>in</strong>troduction of new services, ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to its URL based address<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scheme and its support for MIME type data. There are two major architectural elements to SIP: the Server, and<br />

the User Agent (UA). There exist three different server types, a redirect server, a proxy server, and a registrar<br />

server. The UA resides at the SIP end station, and conta<strong>in</strong>s two components: a User Agent Client (UAC), which<br />

is responsible of issu<strong>in</strong>g SIP requests, and a User Agent Server (UAS), which responds to such requests. It is <strong>in</strong><br />

the realm of SIP where most of the discussions on IN services <strong>in</strong> VoIP networks and <strong>in</strong>teroperability with legacy<br />

SS7-IN is happen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

SIP for Telephones (SIP-T) focuses on how SIP should be used to provide ISUP transparency across PSTN-IP<br />

<strong>in</strong>terconnections. This is achieved us<strong>in</strong>g both translation and encapsulation of ISUP messages <strong>in</strong>to SIP<br />

messages. At SIP-ISUP gateways, SS7 ISUP messages are encapsulated with<strong>in</strong> SIP. Intermediaries like proxy<br />

servers that make rout<strong>in</strong>g decisions for SIP requests cannot be routed.<br />

7.3.4.2 H.323<br />

H.323 is not a s<strong>in</strong>gle protocol but an umbrella cover<strong>in</strong>g a wide range of protocols. Initially targeted to<br />

multimedia conferences over LANs that do not provide guaranteed quality of service QoS, ITU-T H.323 has<br />

evolved towards the MAN and WAN environments. A typical H.323 network is composed of a number of zones<br />

<strong>in</strong>terconnected via a WAN. Each zone consists of a gatekeeper (GK), a number of term<strong>in</strong>al endpo<strong>in</strong>ts (TE), and<br />

a number of multipo<strong>in</strong>t control units (MCU) <strong>in</strong>terconnected by a LAN or MAN. The GK is an H.323 entity<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g address translation and control access to the network for the rest of elements. The MCU is an endpo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g the capabilities for multipo<strong>in</strong>t conferences. MGCP<br />

7.3.4.3 MGCP<br />

Traditionally Telecom signal<strong>in</strong>g schemes have been based on a centralized model, where the <strong>in</strong>telligence and<br />

call control stand <strong>in</strong> the network entity rather then <strong>in</strong> the communication endpo<strong>in</strong>ts; this paradigm has been<br />

extended for VoIP applications with the MGCP (media Gateway Control Protocol) protocol and its variants (it is<br />

used for example <strong>in</strong> the IPCABLECOM architecture, and called Network Control signal<strong>in</strong>g). A Media gateway<br />

controller takes care of application signal<strong>in</strong>g, and transits simple commands to the user term<strong>in</strong>al. Some<br />

extensions of MGCP could be imag<strong>in</strong>ed for multimedia applications, however it does not scale very well, SIP<br />

and H323 be<strong>in</strong>g better alternatives.<br />

7.3.4.4 Services, migration and <strong>in</strong>terconnection to legacy networks<br />

Today, the signal<strong>in</strong>g system of choice <strong>in</strong> the telephone network is SS7. SS7 together with IN services are<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g advanced features, which are desirable <strong>in</strong> future IP based networks also. There is work <strong>in</strong> progress on<br />

how to <strong>in</strong>tegrate exist<strong>in</strong>g signal<strong>in</strong>g and IN services to other networks, ma<strong>in</strong>ly IP based networks.<br />

The Services <strong>in</strong> the PSTN/IN Request<strong>in</strong>g Internet Services (spirits) Work<strong>in</strong>g Group of the IETF Transport Area<br />

addresses how services supported by IP network entities can be started from IN (Intelligent Network) requests,<br />

as well as the protocol arrangements through which PSTN can request actions to be carried out <strong>in</strong> the IP network<br />

<strong>in</strong> response to events (IN triggers) occurr<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the PSTN/IN. The SPIRITS architecture was born as a<br />

response to a previous work called PSTN/Internet Internetwork<strong>in</strong>g (PINT) <strong>in</strong> support of the services <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong><br />

the reverse direction – from the Internet to PSTN.


7.3.5 IPv6<br />

7.3.5.1 Introduction<br />

Page 86 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal benefit of IPv6, and the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for <strong>in</strong>itial deployment, is a vastly <strong>in</strong>creased address space<br />

compared with its predecessor IPv4. IPv4 has a 32-bit address space, theoretically provid<strong>in</strong>g for 2 32<br />

(approximately 4 billion) unique Internet node addresses. In contrast, IPv6 has a 128-bit address space,<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g 2 128 (2 32 x 2 32 x 2 32 x 2 32 ) unique addresses.<br />

The fact that these addresses are unique and globally-routable is very significant. Grow<strong>in</strong>g numbers of popular<br />

applications, such as file-shar<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>stant messag<strong>in</strong>g, are built on a peer-to-peer model that requires end<br />

nodes to have unique, globally-routable addresses. Nodes addressed <strong>in</strong> this way are able to establish unmediated<br />

communications with each other, between any two po<strong>in</strong>ts on the Internet (between 'peers', hence 'peer-to-peer').<br />

Users whose ISPs provide them with connectivity via Network Address Translation (NAT – a commonly<br />

deployed solution to overcome IPv4 address shortages) will have difficulty <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g these popular applications<br />

precisely because they do not have unique addresses.<br />

For some bus<strong>in</strong>ess organisations, globally-routable address space may not be important, and they may choose to<br />

implement a privately-addressed network with NAT devices at the borders. This will be an effective solution <strong>in</strong><br />

the short term. However, such organisations must understand the risks <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> this strategy. It may be<br />

impossible to merge a privately-addressed network with another privately-addressed network, requir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stead<br />

a complex and costly network renumber<strong>in</strong>g operation. Choos<strong>in</strong>g private-address<strong>in</strong>g now also closes the door to<br />

deploy<strong>in</strong>g peer-to-peer applications or any other end-to-end services (e.g. IPsec) <strong>in</strong> the future 30 .<br />

7.3.5.2 State of the art<br />

Research relat<strong>in</strong>g to IPv6 has received strong emphasis from the EU, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a number of <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

projects. European IPv6 test bed <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• 6NET (http://www.6net.org/): A native IPv6-based network connect<strong>in</strong>g 16 countries <strong>in</strong> order to ga<strong>in</strong><br />

experience of IPv6 deployment and migration from exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4-based networks;<br />

• Euro6IX (http://www.euro6ix.org/): European IPv6 Internet Exchanges Backbone. Its goal is to support<br />

the rapid <strong>in</strong>troduction of IPv6 <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />

• GEANT2 (http://www.geant2.net/): A pan-European research network offer<strong>in</strong>g native IPv6 (actually<br />

dual stack) connectivity;<br />

Also, important <strong>in</strong>itiatives are taken <strong>in</strong> the Asian-Pacific region:<br />

• APAN (http://apan.net/org/ipv6.htm) aims at the deployment of a gigabit native IPv6 production<br />

service and promotes IPv6 development and applications;<br />

• The IPv6 Deployment Field Trial <strong>in</strong> Japan (http://www.v6trans.jp/en/) is a real-life experiment for<br />

switch<strong>in</strong>g to an IPv6-based Internethttp://www.v6trans.jp/en/<strong>in</strong>dex.html.<br />

• CERNET2 (http://www.edu.cn/) is a nationwide academic network <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a us<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 technology.<br />

The most widely used IPv6 access to emerg<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 cores is via tunnel-broker type services. A list of such<br />

tunnel brokers can be found at The IPv6 Portal (http://www.ec.ipv6tf.org). Examples <strong>in</strong> Europe <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• http://tunnel.be.wanadoo.com (Belgium),<br />

• http://www.sixxs.net (The Netherlands),<br />

• http://tb.ipv6.btexact.com (UK),<br />

World-wide examples <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• http://tunnelbroker.net (USA, California),<br />

• http://www.hexago.com (Canada),<br />

• http://tunnelbroker.ipv6.net.au (Australia),<br />

• http://tb.6test.edu.cn (Ch<strong>in</strong>a),<br />

• http://www.iij.ad.jp/en/IPv6/zikken-e.html (Japan),<br />

IPv6 rema<strong>in</strong>s a hot topic <strong>in</strong> European Research. Notably, <strong>in</strong> the access area IPv6 might <strong>in</strong>troduce new<br />

opportunities and services. This area is covered by the European <strong>FP6</strong> Integrated <strong>Project</strong> MUSE 31<br />

30 Matthew Ford (BT Exact), “IPv6: Questions Answered”, http://www.ipv6.btexact.com/tutorials/ipv6qa.html<br />

31 Multi Service Access Everywhere (MUSE), http://www.ist-muse.org


7.3.5.3 Issues and Trends<br />

Page 87 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The IPv6 Deployment Field Trial, a real-life experiment for switch<strong>in</strong>g to an IPv6-based Internet <strong>in</strong> Japan 32 ,<br />

identifies three major approaches for IPv6 Introduction <strong>in</strong> the Access Network <strong>in</strong> the MIC’s IPv6 Deployment<br />

Guidel<strong>in</strong>e 33 .<br />

RAS BAS Router<br />

PSTN /<br />

ISDN<br />

Tunnel<br />

Router<br />

IPv4<br />

IPv4 / IPv6<br />

Access<br />

ADSL /<br />

CATV / Leased L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

FTTH<br />

Figure 29: IPv6 over IPv4 tunnel between a tunnel router and the CPN<br />

The first approach is depicted <strong>in</strong> Figure 29: an IPv6 over IPv4 tunnel is set up between a tunnel router and the<br />

Customer Premises Network (CPN), without chang<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 access system configuration.<br />

Advantages of this approach <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• The ability to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the stability of the exist<strong>in</strong>g access connections;<br />

• Limit new <strong>in</strong>stallation costs thanks to the shared use of equipment;<br />

• No special awareness of tunnel<strong>in</strong>g is required other than by the devices term<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the tunnel (one <strong>in</strong><br />

the CPN, one <strong>in</strong> the access network edge).<br />

However, the use of tunnel<strong>in</strong>g has its own <strong>in</strong>herent issues:<br />

• Packet transfer efficiency is worse due to the longer length of encapsulated packets;<br />

• Decreases the MTU.<br />

As mentioned <strong>in</strong> the previous section, this approach is already be<strong>in</strong>g deployed all over the world.<br />

RAS BAS Router<br />

PSTN /<br />

ISDN<br />

IPv4 IPv4 / IPv6<br />

Access<br />

ADSL /<br />

CATV / Leased L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

FTTH<br />

Figure 30: Dual stack access routers <strong>in</strong>stead of the exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 access routers<br />

A second approach, depicted <strong>in</strong> Figure 30, is to upgrade (the software of) exist<strong>in</strong>g access equipment to provide a<br />

dual stack. This method enables the exist<strong>in</strong>g equipment to be used to implement access to an IPv6 backbone and<br />

accommodate the exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 access.<br />

The advantage of this approach is that it is possible to implement IPv6 access us<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g equipment, thus<br />

<strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g little cost. However, a big concern is that configur<strong>in</strong>g dual stack <strong>in</strong> devices that previously only<br />

provided IPv4 access may have a negative impact on the operat<strong>in</strong>g stability of the exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 services.<br />

The third and f<strong>in</strong>al approach is depicted <strong>in</strong> Figure 31: new IPv6 (or dual-stack) access routers are <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong><br />

parallel with the exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 access routers. This approach allows implement<strong>in</strong>g an IPv6 access connection<br />

while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the configuration and stability of the exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 access. A major drawback of this approach<br />

32 “IPv6 Deployment Field Trial”, http://www.v6trans.jp/en/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

33 M<strong>in</strong>istry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC), Japan, “IPv6 Deployment Guidel<strong>in</strong>e” (draft),<br />

http://www.v6trans.jp/en/10.html


Page 88 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

is of course the cost associated with <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g the new equipment and manag<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> parallel<br />

with exist<strong>in</strong>g equipment.<br />

RAS BAS Router RAS BAS Router<br />

PSTN/<br />

ISDN<br />

ADSL/<br />

CATV/<br />

FTTH<br />

Leased<br />

L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Access<br />

PSTN/<br />

ISDN<br />

IPv4 IPv4 / IPv6<br />

ADSL/<br />

CATV/<br />

FTTH<br />

Leased<br />

L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Figure 31: IPv6 (or dual stack) access routers <strong>in</strong> parallel with the exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 access routers<br />

7.3.5.4 Gap Analysis<br />

There are no real technical limitations prevent<strong>in</strong>g the large-scale <strong>in</strong>troduction of IPv6 <strong>in</strong> access networks.<br />

However, operators currently are reluctant to start offer<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 connectivity to their customers. Without new<br />

applications and clear customer demand, requir<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>troduction of IPv6, operators judge the f<strong>in</strong>ancial risk of<br />

upgrad<strong>in</strong>g their equipment cannot be justified.<br />

7.3.5.5 Roadmap<br />

Near Term<br />

A questionnaire, distributed among European operators participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the <strong>IST</strong> MUSE project 34 , <strong>in</strong>dicates a<br />

consensus that access devices should become IP-aware. Motivations for this approach <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

scalability and flexibility, offload<strong>in</strong>g the edge node (by perform<strong>in</strong>g more tasks on the access node), QoS and<br />

service support. At the same time, more and more European operators are acquir<strong>in</strong>g large IPv6 prefixes 35 :<br />

• TeliaSonera (http://www.teliasonera.com/) 2001:2000::/20<br />

• Cable & Wireless, Germany (http://www.cw.com/) 2001:5000::/21<br />

• @home Benelux (http://www.home.nl/) 2001:1c00::/23<br />

• Sunrise (http://www.sunrise.ch/) 2001:1700::/27<br />

• Vodafone-Libertel (www.vodafone.nl/) 2001:1600::/31<br />

• British Telecom (http://www.bt.com/) 2001:618::/32<br />

However, there is a reluctance of <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 <strong>in</strong> the Access without clear market demand and first<br />

generation IP access devices will most likely be IPv4 (accord<strong>in</strong>g to the MUSE operator questionnaire mentioned<br />

above).<br />

Medium Term<br />

Once IPv6 <strong>in</strong>troduction beg<strong>in</strong>s (with<strong>in</strong> a few years, current estimates for IPv4 address exhaustion range from<br />

2010 and beyond 36 ), IPv6 and IPv4 will co-exist for many years to come while exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4-based services will<br />

gradually be<strong>in</strong>g fazed out.<br />

Long term<br />

Eventually we’re go<strong>in</strong>g to a full-IPv6 Internet, where end-users receive 48-bit prefixes (Internet Architecture<br />

Board – http://www.iab.org/ – and Internet Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Steer<strong>in</strong>g Group – http://www.ietf.org/iesg.html –<br />

policy). This allows for arbitrarily complex customer premises networks, where network devices <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

<strong>in</strong>telligent home electronics, sensors, cameras and other home security devices <strong>in</strong> addition to computers and<br />

other multimedia devices and of course home routers.<br />

34 Multi Service Access Everywhere (MUSE), http://www.ist-muse.org<br />

35 John K<strong>in</strong>g and Matthew Ford (BT Exact), “BT & IPv6”, February 28, 2005, http://www.ipv6.btexact.com/presentations/<br />

36 Matthew Ford (BT Exact), “IPv6: Questions Answered”, http://www.ipv6.btexact.com/tutorials/ipv6qa.html


7.3.6 Physical layer aspects<br />

7.3.6.1 Introduction<br />

Page 89 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The physical layer, which corresponds to Layer 1 of the OSI reference model, is concerned primarily with the<br />

representation, <strong>in</strong>terpretation, process<strong>in</strong>g, regeneration and transfer of signals from a source to a dest<strong>in</strong>ation or<br />

an <strong>in</strong>termediate system via so-called transport media accord<strong>in</strong>g to agreed conventions. This layer can be<br />

furthermore divided <strong>in</strong>to the sublayers PHY and PMD (physical media dependent) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the physical<br />

medium. Be<strong>in</strong>g the bridge between the upper OSI Layer 2 entities and PMD devices, the PHY sublayer deals<br />

with parameters that support transmitt<strong>in</strong>g, receiv<strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g of data <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g modulation, multiplex<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

and CDR. Upcom<strong>in</strong>g additional functionalities are EDC and FEC. The ma<strong>in</strong> PMD sublayer functionalities<br />

comprise transmitt<strong>in</strong>g and receiv<strong>in</strong>g of signals at predef<strong>in</strong>ed wavelengths, voltages, data rates and target<br />

distances. Hardware to perform these tasks <strong>in</strong> the optical doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude optionally amplifiers, isolators, filters,<br />

(de)multiplexers, dispersion compensation, directional couplers, connectors etc. In the case of e/o-conversions,<br />

lasers, photodiodes, preamplifiers and laser drivers also are a part of the physical layer. Physical media could be<br />

optical fibres, copper cables such as twisted pair and coaxial l<strong>in</strong>es. For wireless <strong>in</strong>terconnections the transport<br />

medium is free space.<br />

The term broadband isn’t def<strong>in</strong>ed very well. DSL, and wireless solutions or even ISDN are often considered to<br />

be broadband. Indicated by several roadmaps 37 38 , and statements of various organisations, the peak l<strong>in</strong>k data<br />

rate to realise truly broadband access l<strong>in</strong>ks should be at least 100 Mb/s (symmetrical) for private customers<br />

(already offered e.g. <strong>in</strong> Japan) and 1 to 10 Gb/s for bus<strong>in</strong>ess applications.<br />

technical<br />

general<br />

Parameter Remarks<br />

peak data rate<br />

>100 Mb/s (private customers)<br />

N x 1 Gb/s up to 10 Gb/s (bus<strong>in</strong>ess, WDM)<br />

transmission distances typ. < 10 km, max. 20 km, e.g. for alternative network topologies<br />

temperature range<br />

controlled: + 10 °C to + 50 °C<br />

uncontrolled operation <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs: - 5 °C to + 85 °C<br />

uncontrolled operation <strong>in</strong> the field: - 33 °C to + 85 °C<br />

triple play<br />

low capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX)<br />

long lifetime<br />

humidity and vibrations (shock) have to be considered at non-weatherprotected locations<br />

no optical amplifiers <strong>in</strong> the field<br />

no optical dispersion compensation<br />

Table 10: Optical access network requirements<br />

When build<strong>in</strong>g-out broadband access networks a unique set of requirements have to be considered, (Table 10).<br />

Currently, the loop length to reach the majority of customers can vary between 2 km <strong>in</strong> Asia and 10 km <strong>in</strong> the<br />

USA but alternative optical access network topologies (e.g. r<strong>in</strong>gs), which differ from the traditional star<br />

topology, <strong>in</strong>duce larger transmission distances of up to 20 km. There are also unique environmental operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conditions. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the place of <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>in</strong> the field, operat<strong>in</strong>g temperatures can vary between – 33 °C<br />

up to + 85 °C. The ability to deliver voice, video, and data over a common media (triple play option) as well as<br />

low CAPEX and OPEX are also essential topics.<br />

37 European Roadmap (http://www.ist-optimist.org/tech.asp)<br />

38 OITDA Roadmap (http://www.oitda.or.jp/ma<strong>in</strong>/nl/news_letter-10.html)


7.3.6.2 State of the art / exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies<br />

Page 90 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Physical transport layer entities def<strong>in</strong>e the representation of the signal to be transported. Besides analog SCM,<br />

simple NRZ based digital transmission is commonly used <strong>in</strong> optical access networks. To describe accurately<br />

communication l<strong>in</strong>ks with respect to PHY, PMD and their medial <strong>in</strong>frastructure, a multitude of additional<br />

parameters have to be considered which specify the correspond<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>k transparency. P2P and P2MP are widely<br />

implemented communication l<strong>in</strong>k architectures typically deployed <strong>in</strong> star type or r<strong>in</strong>g topologies which may also<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporate some form of active or passive switch<strong>in</strong>g/rout<strong>in</strong>g/splitt<strong>in</strong>g facilities.<br />

Beyond ATM often used <strong>in</strong> DSL deployments, the prevalent LAN communication technology Ethernet is<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g more popular <strong>in</strong> the access doma<strong>in</strong>. In the framework of the Ethernet standardisation process IEEE<br />

has specified a collection of PMDs, <strong>in</strong> particular the EFM task force (IEEE 802.3ah) has released viable P2P (up<br />

to 10 km) and M2MP (up to 20 km) FTTB/P <strong>in</strong>terfaces that complete legacy Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet and<br />

10 Gb/s Ethernet solutions. IEEE task force 802.3aq (10GBase-LRM) has also begun standardisation efforts for<br />

EDC supported transmission at 10 Gb/s. To accelerate the Ethernet progress IEEE and other standardisation<br />

organisations <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ITU, DSL Forum and Metro Ethernet Forum, currently aim at extended carrier grade<br />

Ethernet standards to ensure reliable and manageable end-to-end communication <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g all network<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>s (LAN, Access, Metro, WAN) and for all services and media.<br />

7.3.6.3 Active access networks (FTTCab)<br />

Telecom providers <strong>in</strong>vest currently <strong>in</strong> DSL roll-outs <strong>in</strong> order to upgrade their telephone networks. The number<br />

of xDSL l<strong>in</strong>es worldwide <strong>in</strong>creased to 100m (as of 31 December 2004) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g emerg<strong>in</strong>g ADSL2+<br />

connections with 25 Mb/s top downstream speeds over maximum 2 km. Recently, advanced VDSL transceivers<br />

were announced offer<strong>in</strong>g fibre-like speeds up to 100 Mb/s symmetrically over maximum 200 meters. Hence, to<br />

boost the reach of broadband DSL, carriers <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly adopt FTTN strategies characterised by runn<strong>in</strong>g fibres<br />

between CO and active remote cab<strong>in</strong>ets that are placed close to the residential neighborhood while still us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

present twisted pair l<strong>in</strong>es to connect the customers.<br />

Another FTTN type is HFC. Here, hybrid fibre coaxial systems are used to transport signals from the cable<br />

operators headend to remote nodes that convert these signals to radio frequency carrier signals and connect<br />

residential customers via upgraded two-way coaxial cable networks. The number of HFC l<strong>in</strong>es worldwide<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased to 50 million (as of 31 December 2004). Recently, advanced HFC systems were announced provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

up to 1 Gb/s downstream based on the wideband protocol for DOCSIS. However, <strong>in</strong>sufficient upstream data<br />

path capabilities will rema<strong>in</strong> the major limitation of HFC networks.<br />

The use of hybrid media FTTN structures is also likely <strong>in</strong> conjunction with wireless access schemes. Several<br />

operators are triall<strong>in</strong>g e.g. WiMax networks based on the fixed wireless standard 802.16d as a potential<br />

(temporary) ADSL replacement. WiMax is expected to offer high-throughput broadband connections (shared<br />

capacity up to 70 Mb/s) over distances up to 3-12 km or even more.<br />

It can be concluded that FTTCab represents merely an option rather than an evolutionary step to deliver<strong>in</strong>g<br />

broadband services to end users. Here, the most strik<strong>in</strong>g disadvantages are the need for temperature controlled<br />

remote outside nodes and active hardware that operates reliable over extreme temperature ranges, electric power<br />

needs (at least power<strong>in</strong>g via spare copper pairs), as well as <strong>in</strong>creased CAPEX (expensive and complex<br />

hardware) and OPEX (reliability and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance). A compromise could be to run the fibre network to a nearby<br />

node outside the customer premises creat<strong>in</strong>g a form of FTTC <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with simple and <strong>in</strong>expensive node<br />

equipment. However, there is a widespread consensus that the outside plant of access networks should be<br />

constructed preferably us<strong>in</strong>g passive optical components only. Key components of optical networks are fibres,<br />

connectors/splices, filters, splitters, lasers, photodiodes and transceivers, respectively. In addition, to construct<br />

the fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructure cost-effective <strong>in</strong>stallation methods are required <strong>in</strong> particular for the distribution and drop<br />

network portion. Potentials and technical barriers to make pure optical access <strong>in</strong>frastructures ma<strong>in</strong>stream and to<br />

outperform hybrid xDSL, DOCSIS and fixed wireless outside solutions us<strong>in</strong>g complex cab<strong>in</strong>ets will be<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapters.


7.3.6.4 Key components of optical access networks<br />

Page 91 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In Europe sparely exist<strong>in</strong>g fibre routes <strong>in</strong> the access doma<strong>in</strong> are ma<strong>in</strong>ly composed of SSMF recommended <strong>in</strong><br />

ITU G.652, 39 . However, the undef<strong>in</strong>ed attenuation performance <strong>in</strong> the water peak region at 1383 nm restrict<br />

signal transmission operation <strong>in</strong> this range to short haul applications. Hence, upcom<strong>in</strong>g fibre implementations<br />

should be based preferably on Z/LWPF compliant to ITU G.652d 40 enabl<strong>in</strong>g permanently future proof full<br />

spectrum operation <strong>in</strong> the optical long wave range over the required distances at a maximum loss of 0.4 dB/km<br />

and without extra costs, while provid<strong>in</strong>g full backward compatibility with the legacy SSMF plant. Consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

analog video signal transmission, enhanced fibre designs based on this standard are also available featur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

improved stimulated Brillou<strong>in</strong> scatter<strong>in</strong>g thresholds. Moreover, fibres compliant to 41 with a reduced bend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

radius less than 10 mm can be applied advantageously to cut space requirements <strong>in</strong> modules and cab<strong>in</strong>ets.<br />

Install<strong>in</strong>g the optical fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> the feeder, distribution and drop portion of an access network is a<br />

challeng<strong>in</strong>g task due to technical and economical reasons. Implementation directly <strong>in</strong> the ground (direct-burial),<br />

<strong>in</strong>to ducts and aerial implementations are the cable <strong>in</strong>stallation techniques ma<strong>in</strong>ly used <strong>in</strong> practice for both<br />

greenfield applications and to redesign legacy networks. Consider<strong>in</strong>g duct techniques, conventional pulled<br />

cabl<strong>in</strong>g shows several disadvantages compared to blown fibre techniques that can be used to jet microducts <strong>in</strong>to<br />

old ducts even when occupied with resident cables. Furthermore, fibre bundles can be jetted <strong>in</strong>to newly <strong>in</strong>stalled<br />

microducts that however require some form of trench<strong>in</strong>g, plow<strong>in</strong>g and sewer or aerial <strong>in</strong>stallation to create the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial tube network. Microduct diameters e.g. range from 16 mm for up to 120-fibre cables down to 4 mm for up<br />

to 4-fibre cables while spliceless blow<strong>in</strong>g distances can exceed 6 km. Midspan access can be applied at any<br />

place and any time. Hav<strong>in</strong>g implemented the <strong>in</strong>itial tube network, blown fibre can be considered as a pay-asyou-grow<br />

approach that only needs <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> optical fibres when customers request a connection.<br />

Connectors have to be used <strong>in</strong> access network facilities where test<strong>in</strong>g and configuration are required. Standard<br />

size connectors as well as small form factor connectors may reliably deployed even <strong>in</strong> the outside plant portion<br />

of the fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructure e.g. <strong>in</strong> outdoor cab<strong>in</strong>ets and meet the demands result<strong>in</strong>g from non-weather-protected<br />

operation. To avoid corrosion effects there is a preference for connectors with full ceramic ferrules and sleeves.<br />

As far as splic<strong>in</strong>g is concerned, fusion (mass) splicers especially designed for cost sensitive FTTx applications,<br />

can be applied economically for both s<strong>in</strong>gle fibres and ribbon cables that represent a viable option to facilitate<br />

fibre management problems.<br />

In order to set-up CWDM schemes, (de)multiplexers and OADMs based on TFF technologies are favoured due<br />

to their maturity and excellent filter characteristics. Key performance metrics for passive components <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

<strong>in</strong>sertion loss, crosstalk isolation, and ambient temperature. The <strong>in</strong>sertion loss of a multiplexer-demultiplexer<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation may be maximum 3.5 dB for 16 channels. The crosstalk figure is better than -28 dB and quite<br />

sufficient for system applications but can be improved us<strong>in</strong>g a more complex filter design if necessary. CWDM<br />

standard OADMs have the tendency of generat<strong>in</strong>g unwanted passband ranges typically 150 nm to 200 nm away<br />

from their specific bandpass frequency. Hence, for full spectrum operation, ultrablock<strong>in</strong>g filters are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

available featur<strong>in</strong>g low transmittance outside their passband area. However, further progress has to be made with<br />

respect to thermal stability because most filter modules do not perform over the extended temperature range but,<br />

it is expected that packag<strong>in</strong>g technologies will advance quickly on demand.<br />

Compact uncooled transmission modules are becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important consider<strong>in</strong>g cost-effective access<br />

network implementations. PMD entities for use <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e cards and network term<strong>in</strong>ations (ONU, ONT) are often<br />

arranged <strong>in</strong> the form of transceivers implemented <strong>in</strong> preferably compact modules. MSA based small-form-factor<br />

pluggable (SFP) is the most compact form factor specified for transceivers enabl<strong>in</strong>g a simple <strong>in</strong>stallation<br />

procedure. Modules are offered that <strong>in</strong>corporate different k<strong>in</strong>ds of photo diodes (PIN, APD) and lasers (DFB,<br />

FP) provid<strong>in</strong>g optical power budgets up to 30 dB enough to span some tens of kilometres, and speeds up to<br />

2.7 Gb/s for standard applications and up to 4 Gb/s e.g. or use <strong>in</strong> storage area networks. First modules are<br />

designed to work <strong>in</strong> uncontrolled temperature extremes of - 33 °C to + 85 °C and recently transceivers became<br />

available that extend the SFP modules to accommodate cool<strong>in</strong>g entities needed for DWDM operation. In any<br />

case, the SFP design <strong>in</strong>corporates only PMD functionalities while PHY oriented devices have to be arranged<br />

externally on optical l<strong>in</strong>e cards. Additionally, various types of MSA compliant 10 Gb/s transceivers have been<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced that operate over a wide range of l<strong>in</strong>k distances <strong>in</strong> accordance with IEEE 802.3ae via serial optical<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ks and, <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g CWDM m<strong>in</strong>iature (de)multiplexers, via four different lanes work<strong>in</strong>g at 3.125 Gb/s <strong>in</strong><br />

the 1300 nm region to mitigate transmission impairments 42 . Some PHY functionalities are <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> the<br />

39<br />

ITU-T Recommendation G. 652, Characteristics of a s<strong>in</strong>gle-mode optical fibre and cable<br />

40<br />

ITU-T Recommendation G. 652, Characteristics of a s<strong>in</strong>gle-mode optical fibre and cable, Table D<br />

41<br />

IEC 60793-2-50 Annex G<br />

42<br />

IEEE Standard 802.3.ae-2002, 10GBASE-LX4


Page 92 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

designs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g EDC as low-cost alternative to the CWDM solution. The most compact XFP module likely<br />

have to compete with SFP modules that are expected to provide also 10 Gb/s <strong>in</strong>terfaces <strong>in</strong> the long run.<br />

Due to their poor spectral characteristics the deployment of low-cost FP type lasers is almost restricted to simple<br />

short-haul transport systems. Up to now, <strong>in</strong>herently more expensive uncooled DFB type DMLs are the<br />

workhorse for <strong>in</strong>termediate reach applications <strong>in</strong> particular for CWDM systems. Here, low cost 10 Gb/s DML<br />

recently became available. However, to mitigate high-rate transmission impairments at longer wavelength<br />

associated with the chirp behaviour of directly modulated DFB lasers, more advanced, dispersion tolerant lasers<br />

e.g. FGL may be needed. In order to span access network distances long wavelength range VCSEL may become<br />

a cost-effective alternative light source s<strong>in</strong>ce current technological issues <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>gle mode output power,<br />

temperature dependency, reliability and manufacturability can be overcome.<br />

7.3.6.5 Optical access networks with passive outside plant<br />

Home run is the most straightforward passive approach us<strong>in</strong>g dedicated fibres between CO and each customer<br />

for both transfer directions. Thus, signal transparency is not restricted to any parameter important for simple data<br />

transmission, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g upgrade capabilities up to 10 Gb/s. However, despite the availability of very low-cost<br />

transceivers and media converters, this high fibre count approach <strong>in</strong>volves massive fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments and may imply severe fibre management problems <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> the feeder segment of access<br />

networks.<br />

Different multiplex<strong>in</strong>g techniques are expected to provide cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs to the optical <strong>in</strong>frastructure by<br />

simplify<strong>in</strong>g the fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructure due to a reduced number of needed fibres, connectors, splices etc., however,<br />

at the expense of higher performance transceivers and additional signal process<strong>in</strong>g devices <strong>in</strong> the transmission<br />

path. BWDM and CWDM are currently the most important WDM schemes <strong>in</strong> access networks.<br />

BWDM uses only a s<strong>in</strong>gle strand of fibre per customer to accommodate bidirectional up and down traffic us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

either widely spaced wavelengths or even the same wavelength. Signal separation can be implemented without<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g expensive optical multiplexers result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>ally more expensive transceiver modules vs. s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

channel operation. 10 Gb/s upgrade potentials are dependent on the realised wavelength regime. Generally, this<br />

concept reduces system costs, doubles capacity per fibre, and simplifies fibre management efforts.<br />

CWDM compliant with ITU G.671 is another promis<strong>in</strong>g WDM scheme enabl<strong>in</strong>g a more efficient utilization of<br />

the fibre bandwidth. ITU G.694.2 def<strong>in</strong>es a CWDM wavelengths grid 43 that covers 18 wavelengths over the<br />

entire optical spectrum between 1270 nm and 1610 nm with 20 nm channel spac<strong>in</strong>g. Additionally, CWDM<br />

applications 44 are described <strong>in</strong> the ITU recommendation G.695. CWDM is a highly transparent, protocol<br />

agnostic WDM scheme designed for use with uncooled DMLs. Components are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly available for full<br />

spectrum operation. For reference purposes, a simple power budget associated with a straightforward 16 channel<br />

Mux<br />

Transmitter Receiver<br />

20 km ZWPF<br />

Demux<br />

20 km ZWPF... .. 8.0 dB<br />

4 connectors.... . 2.0 dB<br />

10 splices ....... .. 1.0 dB<br />

DeMux comb<strong>in</strong>.<br />

16 ch. TFF.......... 3.5 dB<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>................ 2.5 dB<br />

Total..................17.0 dB<br />

Figure 32: Schematic of a straightforward CWDM system and assumed typical values for loss and marg<strong>in</strong>. Due<br />

to the passive nature of the <strong>in</strong>volved optics this system may be also operated bidirectionally<br />

CWDM system us<strong>in</strong>g ZWPF and TFF (de)multiplexers is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 32. Assum<strong>in</strong>g a receiver sensitivity<br />

of – 23 dBm (BER of 10 -10 @ 1.25 Gb/s), a laser output power of m<strong>in</strong>imum – 6 dBm is needed that<br />

corresponds very well even with modest DFB laser capabilities.<br />

Switched Ethernet is another P2P option ma<strong>in</strong>ly used for FTTP applications that ensures a dedicated bandwidth<br />

to each switch<strong>in</strong>g node. Here, a s<strong>in</strong>gle fibre strand <strong>in</strong>terconnects the CO and an aggregation Ethernet access<br />

switch located <strong>in</strong> the basement of MDUs or MTUs that provides the connectivity to the end users.<br />

43 ITU-T Recommendation G. 694.2 “Spectral Grids for WDM Applications: CWDM Wavelength Grid”, June 2002<br />

44 ITU-T Recommendation G.695, Optical Interfaces for Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g


Page 93 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

PONs are P2MP options for FTTP applications employ<strong>in</strong>g mostly a common feeder fibre along with a passive<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle or cascaded signal splitter <strong>in</strong> a nearby location outside the customer premises and <strong>in</strong>dividual fibres to<br />

connect the customers. In order to compete with cable operators, triplexer transceivers can be <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> the<br />

system to provide cable TV services at a dedicated additional wavelength. Important characteristics of this<br />

approach <strong>in</strong>clude: No need for electrical power at the remote node, transport capacity typically shared among up<br />

to 16 to 32 subscribers, <strong>in</strong>frastructure adjustments <strong>in</strong> the future when customer bandwidth demand grows,<br />

optical power is splitted with the same ratio, access management protocols have to be deployed to avoid<br />

collisions of upstream data com<strong>in</strong>g from multiple customers, due to the shared media operation more expensive<br />

burst mode transceivers are required. Moreover, due to the underly<strong>in</strong>g PON pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, l<strong>in</strong>e rate upgrades towards<br />

10 Gb/s are a very ambitious task.<br />

7.3.6.6 Issues and trends: Technical / socio economic and gap analysis<br />

• ROADM and tunable lasers are be<strong>in</strong>g developed to improve protection switch<strong>in</strong>g and provision<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capabilities of currently fixed access networks.<br />

• Advances are needed with respect to performance, packag<strong>in</strong>g, higher <strong>in</strong>tegration level. In order to<br />

lower the costs and to <strong>in</strong>crease the reliability there is the trend to <strong>in</strong>tegrate multiple components<br />

monolithically on a chip or hybridly on an optical bench.<br />

• Inexpensive10 Gb/s short-haul l<strong>in</strong>ks are becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly vital for both corporate backbone and<br />

access networks. Chromatic dispersion <strong>in</strong> the longer wavelength range <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the chirp<br />

characteristics of DMLs restrict the maximum transmission distance to a few kilometres. 10 Gb/s<br />

upgrad<strong>in</strong>g schemes to extend the system reach exploit among others:<br />

• Advanced laser types such as FGL<br />

• WDM based transport, e.g. 4 x 3.125 Gb/s <strong>in</strong> particular to upgrade CWDM channels<br />

• EML e.g. modulator monolithically <strong>in</strong>tegrated with laser<br />

• EDC (also <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with FEC) for SSMF 45<br />

• Optical filter<strong>in</strong>g of DML signals<br />

• Ethernet-based broadband access network architectures can also use r<strong>in</strong>g topologies 46 .<br />

• Remodulation techniques are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigated to avoid local generation and stabilisation of light and<br />

to provide for universal ONUs at the customer premises 47<br />

• Systems with spectrum-sliced technologies to enable universal wavelength-<strong>in</strong>dependent ONUs that<br />

creates the upstream optical signal by modulat<strong>in</strong>g a super-lum<strong>in</strong>escent diode 48<br />

• Bidirectional s<strong>in</strong>gle-fibre transmission <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with CWDM us<strong>in</strong>g nom<strong>in</strong>al<br />

identical wavelengths for up and downstream signal transport.<br />

• Long-reach PONs aimed at th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g out COs.<br />

7.3.6.7 Gap discussion<br />

In general, costs and maturity of currently available optical components make it economically justifiable to<br />

deploy optical technologies <strong>in</strong> access networks. Moreover, widespread FTTx deployments <strong>in</strong> the future will<br />

drastically decl<strong>in</strong>e CAPEX. However, to accelerate large scale FTTx implementations further R&D is needed.<br />

Current topics <strong>in</strong>clude: P2P Ethernet standard 20 km, FEC <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with EDC and bidirectional data<br />

transport 49 , Ethernet over CWDM, TFF with extended operat<strong>in</strong>g temperature range, less expensive CWDM<br />

transceivers for access network applications, fibre management solutions to solve efficiently high fibre count<br />

problems <strong>in</strong> the feeder network and <strong>in</strong> COs, simple but reliable and cost-effective outdoor nodes for FTTC<br />

applications, <strong>in</strong>door extension of fibre access networks.<br />

The lack of a political vision <strong>in</strong> Europe seems to be the most important obstacle to faster FTTx deployments,<br />

much more than costs and technical shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs 50 .<br />

45<br />

P. J. W<strong>in</strong>zer et al.: 10 Gb/s upgrade of bidirectional CWDM systems us<strong>in</strong>g electronic equalisation and FEC, Journal of Lightwave<br />

Technology, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp 203-210, 2005<br />

46<br />

J. Grubor et al.: Protected r<strong>in</strong>g network for future optical access doma<strong>in</strong>, NOC 2004, pp 106-113<br />

47<br />

J. Prat et al.: Optical Network Unit Based on a Bidirectional Reflective Semiconductor Optical Amplifier for Fiber-to-the-Home<br />

Networks, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, VOL. 17, NO.1, 2005, pp. 250 – 252.<br />

48<br />

K. Akimoto et al.: Gigabit WDM-PON system us<strong>in</strong>g spectrum-slic<strong>in</strong>g technologies, ECOC 2003, Th2.4.6<br />

49<br />

K.-D. Langer et al.: CWDM access network and prospects for <strong>in</strong>troduction of full-duplex wavelength channels, Proc. NOC 2005,<br />

London, July 2005<br />

50<br />

FTTH Council Europe conference "Europe at the Speed of Light", Hand-outs, Amsterdam, February 2005


Page 94 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Additionally, keys to faster FTTx deployments <strong>in</strong> Europe comprise a correspond<strong>in</strong>g legislation, the removal of<br />

regulatory uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties and the creation of authorities responsible for long-term strategy, coord<strong>in</strong>ation and<br />

management issues of broadband networks <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terfaces to customer premises networks and metro<br />

networks.<br />

7.3.6.8 Roadmap<br />

In particular near and medium term activities need both regulatory and technical steps.<br />

Near Term<br />

In a first step there is need to remove barriers for large network roll-outs <strong>in</strong> the access network doma<strong>in</strong>, 51 . Some<br />

critical topics are:<br />

• Creation of an adequate political vision<br />

• Regulation to offer <strong>in</strong>centives and to protect <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> fibre networks, and <strong>in</strong> particular to <strong>in</strong>volve<br />

<strong>in</strong>cumbent operators<br />

• Deregulation with respect to competition on FTTx<br />

• R&D to further push the usage of optical technologies<br />

Medium Term<br />

In a second step creation of fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructures for FTTx is required and start of convergence with fixed part of<br />

mobile networks.<br />

• Open network approach should be preferred <strong>in</strong> order to coord<strong>in</strong>ate civil works, promotion of fibre<br />

provision by governments, operator owned networks<br />

• To use present public funds and to create new ones if necessary<br />

• Introduction of fibre <strong>in</strong> the feeder area between COs and remote nodes (cable cab<strong>in</strong>ets) to enable a wide<br />

range of broadband first/ last metres technologies<br />

• Use of present network nodes which offer power supply (e.g. radio base stations)<br />

• Introduction of remote nodes conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g active electronics if necessary to a certa<strong>in</strong> extent<br />

• Deployment of micro ducts <strong>in</strong> the whole access network doma<strong>in</strong> wherever digg<strong>in</strong>g up sidewalks<br />

• Installation of FTTB, FTTH/ P on demand<br />

Long Term<br />

The long term development is expected to optimize access network <strong>in</strong>frastructure and migrat<strong>in</strong>g towards an<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated network serv<strong>in</strong>g as both broadband access network and backbone of mobile systems.<br />

• Introduction of FTTB/ H/ P as standard broadband access technology<br />

• Extension of passive optical network technology while reduc<strong>in</strong>g/ limit<strong>in</strong>g number of active remote<br />

nodes to limit total power dissipation <strong>in</strong> the access network doma<strong>in</strong><br />

• Mesh<strong>in</strong>g of remote nodes by fibre l<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

51 FTTH Council Europe conference "Europe at the Speed of Light", Hand-outs, Amsterdam, February 2005


7.3.7 Disturbance <strong>in</strong> PLC, Cable and DSL access networks<br />

7.3.7.1 State of the art<br />

Page 95 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Ingress noise<br />

Ingress is def<strong>in</strong>ed as frequency selective impairment <strong>in</strong> contrast with Impulse noise, and can be categorised as<br />

follows:<br />

• Narrowband Ingress <strong>in</strong>jected <strong>in</strong> the network itself: the major causes are identified as be<strong>in</strong>g AM shortwave,<br />

amateur band, maritime radio transmission; the amplitude of the <strong>in</strong>jected Ingress vary dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

day accord<strong>in</strong>g to the propagation condition; this slow amplitude variation can be significant<br />

• Location specific <strong>in</strong>terference: electronic equipment <strong>in</strong> the subscriber premise can <strong>in</strong>ject a high level of<br />

Ingress <strong>in</strong>to the network<br />

Ingress noise characterisation work has taken place <strong>in</strong> the European ACTS project Interact, and some results are<br />

52 53<br />

available<br />

Impulse noise<br />

Impulse noise is known to be the most degrad<strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>in</strong> Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e (xDSL) technologies. It is a<br />

non-stationary crosstalk issued from temporary electromagnetic events <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of telephone l<strong>in</strong>es. Induced<br />

voltage can be as high as 100 mV and typically lasts from 10 to 100 microseconds. In cable networks, they are<br />

of shorter duration, as high pass filtered by the network itself.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the 60's, efforts have been made <strong>in</strong> order to understand and model impulse noise on copper pairs 54 .<br />

One of the well-known models is a representative s<strong>in</strong>gle pulse, also named 'Cook Pulse' 55 , especially used for<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g purposes <strong>in</strong> the HDSL transmission bandwidth. Unfortunately, such a representative pulse is not able<br />

to describe the statistical properties of the noise.<br />

A large amount of work has been done <strong>in</strong> the late eighties, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the n<strong>in</strong>eties, <strong>in</strong> the frame of the ADSL<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction on subscriber loops. To our best knowledge, the most complete measurement campaign and the<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g analytical model of impulse noise statistics has been published by Deutsche Telekom workers <strong>in</strong><br />

1993/94 56 57 58 . They carried out an extensive measur<strong>in</strong>g campaign at central offices <strong>in</strong> a 4.25 MHz bandwidth. It<br />

led to an impulse noise model <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the mean Power Spectral Density (PSD), the phase properties as<br />

well as the analytical statistics of <strong>in</strong>ter-arrival times, lengths and amplitudes. This statistical model is actually<br />

used by several teams as an reliable impulse noise generator.<br />

New work (measurement and simulation methods of impulse noise) as been recently realised, ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the<br />

frame of the SDSL & VDSL normalisation process (cf. documents of the TM6 work<strong>in</strong>g group of ETSI). The<br />

University of Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh was <strong>in</strong>volved due to their participation <strong>in</strong> British Telecom l<strong>in</strong>es measurement<br />

campaign.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, the two models (DT & BT) of impulse noise have merged <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t publication59 .<br />

In HFC networks, there is no model available. Proposition of measurements have been<br />

done60 61 62 <strong>in</strong> the literature. This is an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t to work on.<br />

52 ème<br />

"Impact of Ingress Noise on the Communication on Hybrid Fibre-Coax Networks", E. Claus, K. Haelvoet, L. Martens, Actes de la 54<br />

conférence ARTFG, pp. 16-20<br />

53<br />

‘Characterization of multiple <strong>in</strong>terference impair<strong>in</strong>g CATV networks return path transmission’, V. Moeyaert, L. Robette, J.C. Froidure,<br />

J. Hanoteau, M. Blondel, CD-Rom OSEE (Onl<strong>in</strong>e Symposium fo Electronics Eng<strong>in</strong>eers), Internet, octobre 2000, disponible à l'adresse :<br />

http://www.techonl<strong>in</strong>e.com/community/home/13645<br />

54<br />

"A theory of impulse noise <strong>in</strong> telephone networks", R. M. Fano, IEEE Trans. Comm. COM-25 (6), June 1977, pp. 577-588<br />

55<br />

"Wideband impulsive noise survey of the access network", J. Cook, BT Technical Journal, vol. 11 (3), 1993, pp 155-162<br />

56<br />

"A Wideband Impulsive Noise Survey <strong>in</strong> the German Telephone Network: Statistical Description and Model<strong>in</strong>g", W. Henkel and T.<br />

Keßler, Archiv fur Elektronik und Uebertragungstechnik, vol. 48, n° 6, 1994, pp 277-288<br />

57<br />

"A Wideband Impulsive Noise Survey on Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>es and Inter-Office Trunks –Model<strong>in</strong>g and Simulation", W. Henkel, T. Kessler,<br />

H. Y. Chung, IEEE Global Communications Conference, 1995, pp. 82-86<br />

58<br />

"Statistical description and modell<strong>in</strong>g of impulsive noise on the German telephone network", W. Henkel, T. Kessler, Electronics Letters,<br />

Vol. 30, n°12, 1994, pp. 935-936<br />

59<br />

"Impulse Generation With Appropriate amplitude, Length, Inter-Arrival, and Spectral Characteristics", I. Mann, S. McLaughl<strong>in</strong>, W.<br />

Henkel, R. Kirlby, T. Kessler, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas <strong>in</strong> Communications, vol.20, n°5, June 2002, pp. 901-912<br />

60<br />

"Ingress and impulse noise measurements on hybrid fiber-coax (HFC) networks", J. Vandenbruaene, E. Claus, L. Martens, B. Merchie,<br />

J. Haspeslagh, P. Gabriel, Communications Cables and Related Technologies, 1998, pp. 425-431<br />

61 ème<br />

"Impact of Ingress Noise on the Communication on Hybrid Fibre-Coax Networks", E. claus, K. Halvoet, L. Martens, Actes de la 54<br />

conférence ARTFG, pp. 16-20


7.3.7.2 Issues and trends / Gap analysis<br />

Page 96 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The requirement to transport much higher bit rates per subscriber upstream and downstream <strong>in</strong>troduce new<br />

challenges for physical layers:<br />

• On po<strong>in</strong>t to po<strong>in</strong>t networks the problem is generally to optimise the channel capacity <strong>in</strong> a very hostile<br />

environment, like PLC and XDSL, while respect<strong>in</strong>g the EMC environmental constra<strong>in</strong>ts; moreover if<br />

high peak bit rates are <strong>in</strong>tended, a much higher channel capacity has to be planned<br />

• For po<strong>in</strong>t to multipo<strong>in</strong>t networks the same constra<strong>in</strong>ts exist, but much higher aggregated bit rates have<br />

to be transported to take advantage of traffic statistical multiplex<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The XDSL, PLC and cable channel models are different <strong>in</strong> some aspects like the frequency response. However<br />

common work would be beneficial on:<br />

• The analysis of impairments <strong>in</strong> the low frequency bands, which are common to the 3 medias<br />

• The set-up of common measurement methods for these impairments<br />

• The def<strong>in</strong>ition and simulation of physical layers, as the impairments will have a major <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong><br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the appropriate physical layer characteristics<br />

• Dynamic spectrum management; as the channel and impairment situation is rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g, there is a<br />

need to adapt dynamically the physical layer to the channel situation, and therefore to make long and<br />

short term analysis of the channel; therefore common techniques of measurement and analysis can be<br />

found.<br />

62 "Procedure for Measurement and Characterization of Upstream Channel Noise <strong>in</strong> CATV Networks", K. Haelvoet, D. De Bal, B.<br />

Vanlandschoot, L. Martens, Actes de la 49 ème conférence ARTFG, 1998, pp. 19-23


7.4 CORE AND METRO<br />

7.4.1 Optical Network - The <strong>in</strong>terface between network segments<br />

Page 97 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Further <strong>in</strong> this document we present the vision and roadmap for the backbone and metro segments of the<br />

broadband network. Both visions hold the view that an important part of network development is to remove<br />

layers of the protocol stack as this reduces both capital and operat<strong>in</strong>g cost by simplify<strong>in</strong>g the equipment.<br />

There appears to be a potential divergence <strong>in</strong> the nature of the protocols underly<strong>in</strong>g the different parts of the<br />

network, or even perhaps between different peer segments of the network with different owners. In very<br />

simplified terms the backbone network community tends to have orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> the telecoms sector, whereas the<br />

metro community comes from the computer network sector. Both have good reasons for their visions but a<br />

strong divergence is undesirable because the ga<strong>in</strong>s made <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the protocol stack with<strong>in</strong> each network<br />

segment will be offset by the need to <strong>in</strong>troduce equipment to condition traffic at the <strong>in</strong>terfaces between<br />

segments.<br />

Currently the pervasiveness of the SDH/SONET solution obviates the need for this condition<strong>in</strong>g with the traffic<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g assembled <strong>in</strong>to frames at the access <strong>in</strong>terface of the network. Both groups see SDH/SONET dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the short term; albeit with migration towards enhanced functionality through NG-SDH, however <strong>in</strong> the longer<br />

term both see SDH/SONET be<strong>in</strong>g replaced by other transport and management solutions.<br />

Migration is also an issue <strong>in</strong> this with different parts of the network chang<strong>in</strong>g at different times. Identification of<br />

methods of manag<strong>in</strong>g this to avoid unnecessary condition<strong>in</strong>g equipment is also likely to pay dividends.<br />

Bread is <strong>in</strong> an ideal position to bestride the two viewpo<strong>in</strong>ts and to develop a synergistic vision, which can then<br />

be dissem<strong>in</strong>ated to <strong>in</strong>fluence development. It is therefore proposed that, dur<strong>in</strong>g the time left with<strong>in</strong> the Bread<br />

project, we try to develop a holistic view of the vision and roadmap for the overall network which is satisfactory<br />

to both groups.<br />

7.4.2 Optical metro/CWDM<br />

7.4.2.1 Introduction: description<br />

The “Broadband for All” concept emerges as a substantial element of the Ambient Intelligence scenario: In the<br />

future environment people will be surrounded and supported by a network structure, which will support all their<br />

communication needs. Ambient <strong>in</strong>telligence requires the embedd<strong>in</strong>g of technology <strong>in</strong> natural surround<strong>in</strong>g such<br />

as build<strong>in</strong>gs, provid<strong>in</strong>g constant access to a variety of services such as enterta<strong>in</strong>ment, personal communications,<br />

tele-education, etc. The Photonic Network, <strong>in</strong> conjunction with control software, provides an <strong>in</strong>telligent<br />

network, which can <strong>in</strong>terconnect the ambient <strong>in</strong>telligent environment with large data and comput<strong>in</strong>g resources.<br />

The Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) lies <strong>in</strong> between two dom<strong>in</strong>ant network<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong>s, namely the<br />

access network and the backbone. It must respond to the dynamic of the ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g long-haul bandwidth<br />

while address<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g connectivity of the access <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The Metro Access Network is spread<br />

over distances of tens of kilometers while the Metro Core Network can reach up to 200 to 300km. Both <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

numerous nodes <strong>in</strong> order to supply the connectivity demanded by the <strong>in</strong>ternal and through traffic of the<br />

structure. Confronted to the expansion of access solutions (wireless, xDSL, FTTx,…) and to the backbone huge<br />

transmission capacity, the MAN lies <strong>in</strong> the center of the operators and vendors <strong>in</strong>terests. CAPital and<br />

OPerational EXpenditure (CAPEX and OPEX) considerations for the overall network (at <strong>in</strong>stallation and over<br />

the years) is strongly related to a proper design (<strong>in</strong> terms of architecture, protocols, subsystems and components)<br />

of this network key element.<br />

Telecommunication traffic has experienced a mutation from a “voice centric” structure towards a “data<br />

centric” one support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternet. In the MAN, traffic is grow<strong>in</strong>g rapidly due to the broadband penetration and<br />

the deployment of regional content servers (video (VoD), storage networks (SAN)). In the next few years, this<br />

traffic enhancement is bound to follow an ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g expansion rate follow<strong>in</strong>g the fast evolution of the<br />

access technology.<br />

The evolution of optical transmission technologies <strong>in</strong> the 1990’s and early 2000’s have delivered a huge<br />

capacity for long-haul data transmission and created a very strong commercial <strong>in</strong>centive towards traffic<br />

enhancement <strong>in</strong> order to justify capital expenditure. In addition, the present emphasis on metropolitan network<br />

results from an evolution of traffic go<strong>in</strong>g from a majority of long distance <strong>in</strong>terchanges towards a very dense<br />

local (metropolitan) traffic.


OADM<br />

WAN<br />

H Hub<br />

CPN/E CPN/E<br />

Figure 33: Metro core and access networks<br />

Page 98 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

WDM<br />

Metro Core R<strong>in</strong>g<br />

50 - 200 km circ.<br />

WDM<br />

Metro Access R<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

10 - 50 km circ.<br />

The metropolitan network is presently structured accord<strong>in</strong>g to a strong legacy and is generally subdivided <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the Metro access network and the Metro core network A metropolitan network must accommodate very varied<br />

applications (voice, video, <strong>in</strong>ternet), must collect traffic from diverse access sources and technologies (LANs,<br />

PONs, Wireless, Hybrid fibre-coax) and must provide adequate quality-of-service, reliability or security level.<br />

Network nodes at the edges of the metro network should perform traffic aggregation to improve the efficiency of<br />

the transport network by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the low bit-rate access signals <strong>in</strong>to a high bit-rate wavelength channel.<br />

Moreover, the network must support bandwidth provision<strong>in</strong>g with various levels of granularity. This very vast<br />

heterogeneity produces a strong demand on the network performance.<br />

Worldwide optical network hardware market revenue hits $2.18 billion <strong>in</strong> 3Q04, with slow growth projected to<br />

2007, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Infonetics Research’s quarterly worldwide market share and forecast report. Furthermore,<br />

worldwide metro WDM revenue hits $294 million <strong>in</strong> 2Q04, and is projected to grow 32% by 3Q05, and just<br />

under $2billion by 2007.<br />

7.4.2.2 The vision<br />

The metropolitan network represents a keystone <strong>in</strong> the evolution toward a data-centric network. The wide area<br />

network has been the great benefactor of the 1990’s optical telecommunication development exhibit<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t-topo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

impressive performances thanks to WDM technology. On the other hand, local traffic and access solutions<br />

have boomed follow<strong>in</strong>g the development of <strong>in</strong>ternet services, both for home or bus<strong>in</strong>ess applications. (e.g. more<br />

peer-to-peer type of network<strong>in</strong>g, access to content servers (such as video (VoD)). Storage area networks (SAN)<br />

and disaster recovery are viewed as a major demand for future metropolitan network requir<strong>in</strong>g secured transfers<br />

of huge quantities of <strong>in</strong>formation. The MAN must provide a very high connectivity, with numerous nodes of<br />

very high capacity. Clearly, optical technology and network<strong>in</strong>g is the only solution for provid<strong>in</strong>g such a<br />

service at the metro level. In a near future, metro architecture will have to deal with fibre l<strong>in</strong>k carry<strong>in</strong>g 100 to<br />

1000 optical 2.5/10 and possibly 40 Gb/s signal requir<strong>in</strong>g Tb/s Add&Drop capacity.<br />

Because of mission critical applications, only the so-called carrier grade MANs are acceptable. Carrier Grade<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly means high reliability/availability (>99.999) and QoS differentiation.<br />

Today, Synchronous Digital Hierarchy/Synchronous Optical Network (SDH/SONET) rema<strong>in</strong>s the dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />

transmission technology <strong>in</strong> the metropolitan area network. It has been the foundation for the MANs over the<br />

last decade, serv<strong>in</strong>g as the fundamental transport layer both for TDM-based circuit switched network and most<br />

overlay data networks. SONET/SDH has evolved <strong>in</strong>to a very resilient technology. The necessity for data<br />

transmission has resulted <strong>in</strong> superpos<strong>in</strong>g protocols <strong>in</strong> order to allow for <strong>in</strong>ternet packet based architecture to fit<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the SDH format physically transported over a WDM optical layer. (IP over ATM over SDH over WDM).<br />

SDH is fairly expensive to implement. The position of SONET/SDH <strong>in</strong>to the metro doma<strong>in</strong> is thus strongly<br />

supported by the necessity of support<strong>in</strong>g legacy. SDH also rema<strong>in</strong>s very attractive thanks to its ability to<br />

support advanced services such as QoS, priority control… However, the circuit switch<strong>in</strong>g oriented protocol is<br />

rather <strong>in</strong>efficient and expensive when confronted to data transport. The evolution of SDH toward the Next<br />

Generation SDH (NG-SDH) is the major issue.<br />

On the other side, com<strong>in</strong>g from the local area network world, the Ethernet protocol spreads towards the MANs.<br />

The question here is whether the evolution of Ethernet will offer the reliability and quality of service of SDH<br />

and support traffic over long distances. MAC protocols dedicated to packet transport (GMPLS) is under study.


Page 99 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The resilient packet r<strong>in</strong>g concept (RPR) offers an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g mean of <strong>in</strong>terfac<strong>in</strong>g Ethernet technology with the<br />

metro doma<strong>in</strong>.<br />

On the physical layer, the <strong>in</strong>troduction of enhanced WDM service <strong>in</strong> the network<strong>in</strong>g architecture requires<br />

development of new optical functionalities such as Optical Add&Drop Multiplexers (OADM) to allow the<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>g of wavelength channels to and from particular access nodes, and to the WAN network. Initially these<br />

OADMs will be fixed <strong>in</strong> relation to the wavelength channels added and dropped. They will eventually move<br />

towards dynamically reconfigurable OADMs, which allow much greater rout<strong>in</strong>g flexibility. For MANs with<br />

many fibres <strong>in</strong> the r<strong>in</strong>g-topology, (the likely topology <strong>in</strong> the near term), Optical cross-Connects (OXC) may be<br />

necessary, if full flexibility of add-drop and fibre switch<strong>in</strong>g is required. The technologies associated with<br />

reconfigurable OADMs and OXCs will allow switch<strong>in</strong>g times of


Page 100 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

concentrat<strong>in</strong>g on packet services. The most prom<strong>in</strong>ent E-MAN architecture is the Resilient Packet R<strong>in</strong>g (RPR).<br />

The RPR is <strong>in</strong>tended to be a carrier grade solution support<strong>in</strong>g QoS differentiation and fast protection switch<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, Optical packet switch<strong>in</strong>g can offer the desired flexible and bandwidth efficient architecture desired<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce it provides smaller granularity to the optical layer allow<strong>in</strong>g a high degree of statistical multiplex<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

7.4.2.4 Network architecture - Technical issues and roadmap<br />

Protection: The carrier-grade reliability (the famous > 99.999 % availability or < 6 m<strong>in</strong>utes average down time<br />

per year) can only be achieved by redundancy. The fibre facility between sites is considered the least reliable<br />

component <strong>in</strong> the system. In r<strong>in</strong>g networks, immunity aga<strong>in</strong>st l<strong>in</strong>k failures is relatively simple. Mesh networks<br />

are more complex to organize for resilience.<br />

Transparency: Fixed or circuit switched wavelength channels are protocol agnostic by nature. This allows<br />

carriers to offer cost effective protocol-transparent wavelength services and to generate <strong>in</strong> this way new<br />

revenues.<br />

Support of provision<strong>in</strong>g: 3 rd generation WDM technology with dynamically (re)configurable add/drop or cross<br />

connects – after WDM po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t transmission (1 st gen.) and fixed add/drop or cross connects (2 nd gen.) -<br />

plays an important role regard<strong>in</strong>g provision<strong>in</strong>g. Together with software <strong>in</strong>telligence, it allows automated<br />

provision<strong>in</strong>g, a big step <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the OPEX.<br />

7.4.2.4.1 Metro Ethernet<br />

The low cost and ubiquity are the ma<strong>in</strong> argument for mak<strong>in</strong>g the Ethernet solution attractive. The present<br />

question is whether Ethernet can be utilized as a direct transport protocol or rema<strong>in</strong>s supported on a<br />

SDH/SONET transport layer. Worldwide Metro Ethernet equipment revenue totalled $3 billion <strong>in</strong> 2003, and is<br />

projected to grow 157% to $7.7 billion <strong>in</strong> 2007. The new generation of Ethernet 10GbE will lead a further<br />

penetration. A 100Gigabit Metro Ethernet is already envisaged. The recognized weakness of Ethernet is its<br />

<strong>in</strong>ability to provide network management. Ethernet operation, adm<strong>in</strong>istration and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance (OAM) is not up<br />

to the job of enabl<strong>in</strong>g or support<strong>in</strong>g a large-scale carrier network, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a end-to-end OAM facilities<br />

provided by an underly<strong>in</strong>g transport mechanism such as NG-SDH. In addition, Metro Ethernet needs to support<br />

r<strong>in</strong>g and mesh topologies. This demand is addresses via new concepts such as resilient packet r<strong>in</strong>g (RPR), and<br />

MPLS (or G(eneralized)MPLS) for QoS and differentiated service provision<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

λ DS1/DS3<br />

OC-x<br />

10/100<br />

GbE<br />

ATM/<br />

STM-x<br />

IP/ATM<br />

IP/MPLS<br />

over SDH<br />

IP<br />

(Router)<br />

Ethernet ATM (X) MPLS XXX<br />

(NG) SDH (X Matrix)<br />

XXXX<br />

YYYY<br />

Optical/DW DM/OADM 2 nd/3 rd Generation<br />

Optical M ulti-service Platform (OM P) us<strong>in</strong>g (NG)<br />

SDH for sub-wavelength multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 4<br />

Platform types<br />

7.4.2.4.2 Circuit burst, Packet switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

λ<br />

10/100<br />

GbE<br />

OC-3..48<br />

STM-1..16<br />

ESCOM<br />

(SAN)<br />

Ethernet SDH ESCON FICON<br />

FICON<br />

(SAN)<br />

Optical/DWDM/OADM 2 nd Generation<br />

Cable<br />

Video<br />

(CATV)<br />

Cable<br />

Video<br />

Optical Platform with m ulti-service wavelength<br />

channel <strong>in</strong>terfaces (OP)<br />

• mapp<strong>in</strong>g of services directly <strong>in</strong>to wavelengths<br />

• conceptual sim ple solution<br />

• can be <strong>in</strong>efficient use of bandeidth<br />

Figure 35: Platform type and evolution<br />

The development of network technology and node architecture represents a major aspect for the design of the<br />

MAN. Present solutions rely ma<strong>in</strong>ly on opaque electronic switch<strong>in</strong>g element supported on the ETDM<br />

SDH/SONET layer<strong>in</strong>g. Some circuit architectures are elaborated on the WDM layer by the use of OADM and<br />

OXC work<strong>in</strong>g on a wavelength basic granularity (or potentially waveband granularity). The node capacity and<br />

the network flexibility will be largely enhanced by the usage of wavelength agile elements allow<strong>in</strong>g dynamic<br />

wavelength allocation at each node. Optical burst and packet switch<strong>in</strong>g would offer a much greater switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and band usage efficiency. Optical nodes for that type of switch<strong>in</strong>g required new characteristics.


7.4.2.4.3 Roadmap summary<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g figure summarizes the roadmap for the network architecture 63<br />

Figure 36: MAN network key issues<br />

7.4.2.5 Enabl<strong>in</strong>g technologies – Technical issues and roadmap<br />

Page 101 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.4.2.5.1 CWDM/DWDM and OTDM<br />

In metro networks, the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand for higher capacities is met by higher data rates and by <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

spectral density. Coarse Wavelength Division multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (CWDM) [ITU-T G694.2] systems are considered<br />

a cheaper alternative to D(ense)WDM systems and are becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important for metro, access, and<br />

cable TV systems where, closer to the end-user, low first-cost economics is the primary issue. The CWDM<br />

channel spac<strong>in</strong>g of 20nm (0.8 nm <strong>in</strong> DWDM) takes advantage of low cost uncooled distributed feed back lasers<br />

and less str<strong>in</strong>gent Mux/Demux components. The relaxed performance specifications and packag<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

enable a 35% to 40% equipment cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs The whole low attenuation w<strong>in</strong>dow from 1,2µm to 1,6µm (app.<br />

60nm) can be filled us<strong>in</strong>g cheap un-colled lasers/transponders. However, broadband amplification over such a<br />

wide bandwidth is not presently available. Full-spectrum CWDM, unrepeatered transmission us<strong>in</strong>g sixteen 2.5-<br />

Gb/s, 20-nm-spaced directly modulated lasers (DMLs) at wavelengths between 1310 nm and 1610 nm has been<br />

demonstrated over 75 km. The losses, the number of channels and channel bit rate limit the atta<strong>in</strong>able system<br />

reach. A significant improvement <strong>in</strong> transmission distance requires broadband amplification, which is<br />

impossible with EDFAs and impractical with Raman amplification. Semiconductor optical amplifiers are<br />

<strong>in</strong>expensive devices for metro applications. Due to the wide channel spac<strong>in</strong>g, a full-spectrum CWDM system<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g at 2.5-Gb/s l<strong>in</strong>e rate is limited to 16 channels with 40-Gb/s total transmission capacity. One approach<br />

to <strong>in</strong>crease the capacity is the migration to recently available 10-Gb/s uncooled DMLs.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> transmission capacity is achieved by the substitution of the 1550-nm CWDM channel with<br />

a DWDM subband. Channel counts up to 15 can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed with temperature stabilized DMLs and <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

lasers electro-absorption-modulators. Dispersion compensation (us<strong>in</strong>g dispersion compensat<strong>in</strong>g modules or<br />

properly eng<strong>in</strong>eered optical fibres) can be <strong>in</strong>troduced for the DWDM channels at the respective multiplexer port<br />

to relax the requirements for new 10Gb/s DMLs <strong>in</strong> the additional DWDM band. Filter concatenation-<strong>in</strong>duced<br />

distortion may become a severe problem <strong>in</strong> transmission.<br />

Further <strong>in</strong>crease of the s<strong>in</strong>gle channel bit rate can be envisaged through Optical Time Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(OTDM). The demand on the electronic speed is transferred onto the optical technology:: short pulse lasers,<br />

synchronization, OTD-demux. Optical signal process<strong>in</strong>g (OADM, OXC, Label <strong>in</strong>telligence) is implemented on<br />

a very different basis on OTDM support.<br />

63 after [<strong>IST</strong>-Optimist, key issue 2004]: www.ist-optimist.org


Page 102 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.4.2.5.2 Transmiters (Tx) and receiver (Rx) modules.<br />

Thanks to the standardization of 10 Gb/s data l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong>terfaces, such as 10-Gigabit Ethernet or SONET OC-<br />

192/SDH STM-64 , and several recent Multi-Source Agreements (MSAs) between vendors to design a common<br />

Tx/Rx modules packag<strong>in</strong>g technology, several solutions would exist to drastically reduce the cost of 10 Gb/s<br />

transceivers/transponders deal<strong>in</strong>g with the evolution of Metro Access Network. Among the different MSA<br />

transceiver types, the XFP (small form factor pluggable) transceiver is the most promis<strong>in</strong>g. It supports all the<br />

10G format protocols via a serial electrical <strong>in</strong>terface. The optical part of XFP transceivers conta<strong>in</strong>s a 10 Gb/s<br />

Transmitter (laser source) and Receiver (photodiode) mounted on a low cost Optical Sub-Assembly (TOSAs and<br />

ROSAs respectively). Many constructors are push<strong>in</strong>g the performances of XFP transceivers towards longer<br />

reach (40, 80 km) and with wavelength stability compliant with DWDM applications. 1,55 µm TOSA based on<br />

monolithic <strong>in</strong>tegration of Electro-Absorption modulator (EAM) and DFB laser are the key component to meet<br />

these specifications. F<strong>in</strong>ally, at longer term, the upgrad<strong>in</strong>g up to 40 Gb/s would <strong>in</strong>crease the channel capacity.<br />

Although 40 Gb/s <strong>in</strong>tegrated laser–modulator are not ready for XFP packages.<br />

7.4.2.5.3 Tuneable sources<br />

The wavelength tuneable light source is a key component for multiplex<strong>in</strong>g, rout<strong>in</strong>g, conversion, dynamic<br />

provision<strong>in</strong>g and reallocation, protection and management of the WDM network, as well as for solv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory problems. It may simply be a hot-swappable laser array, which may have switch<strong>in</strong>g times <strong>in</strong> the<br />

nanosecond range. The electronically tuned multi-electrode laser, e.g. based on sampled grat<strong>in</strong>gs, is more cost<br />

effective, but has presently a switch<strong>in</strong>g time of the order of 1µs and a tun<strong>in</strong>g range of less than 100 nm.<br />

7.4.2.5.4 Roadmap summary for systems and components<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g figure summarizes the roadmap element for the optical systems and components 64<br />

7.4.2.6 Summary<br />

Figure 37: Key issues for the photonic systems and components for the MAN<br />

The metropolitan area network presently represents a major <strong>in</strong>terest for operators and equipment<br />

manufacturers. It holds a strategic position at the junction between the long haul network and the access nodes.<br />

Triple play, Video-on-Demand, gam<strong>in</strong>g, Storage Area Networks are some of the applications that will drive the<br />

predictively fast demand for a resilient, packet oriented, carrier grade metro network. The IP/ATM/SDH legacy<br />

needs to evolve toward a reduction of the protocol tack and a more efficient statistical multiplex<strong>in</strong>g. Innovation<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes the new-generation SDH protocol and the <strong>in</strong>troduction of Ethernet solution (10GbE) (orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

dedicated to Local networks) <strong>in</strong>to the MAN (often via RPR). Long-term evolution foresees the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />

packet switch<strong>in</strong>g directly <strong>in</strong> the optical doma<strong>in</strong>s. Presently, the cost reduction required for the MAN is obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the physical layer by the development of Coarse WDM us<strong>in</strong>g un-cooled sources and normalized packaged<br />

transceivers/receivers. Capacity and reach enhancements relies on development of low cost high bit rate<br />

transmitters (10 Gb/s DML or 40 Gb/s ILM) compatible with CWDM then DWDM. Wavelength agility<br />

represents an important longer-term requirement for the full usage of the WDM network<strong>in</strong>g services.<br />

64 after [<strong>IST</strong>-Optimist, key issue 2004] : www.ist-optimist.org


7.4.3 Optical Backbone<br />

7.4.3.1 Introduction<br />

Page 103 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The backbone, national or wide area network may extend over distances of thousands of kilometers and<br />

provides an <strong>in</strong>terconnection fabric for regional and metropolitan networks.<br />

In recent years considerable capacity has been <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> this network layer, so major <strong>in</strong>vestment is not<br />

expected <strong>in</strong> the near future. Current <strong>in</strong>vestment is focused on develop<strong>in</strong>g revenue streams or reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

operational expenditure. There is a trend towards reduc<strong>in</strong>g the number of major network nodes and build<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

very high capacity backbone, essentially a fabric of very high capacity pipes, with much of the process<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>g devolved to the regional and metro layers.<br />

The deployment of Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (WDM) techniques and equipment <strong>in</strong> the field has<br />

provided backbone networks with high capacity and long reach capabilities. In this part of the network, <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to maximise the use of the available fibre bandwidth, the trend has been to develop systems with more WDM<br />

channels together with higher bit rates. Currently deployed systems could transmit 160 channels each at<br />

10Gbit/s. In reality, as yet, few l<strong>in</strong>ks use more than a handful (~20) of these channels however. Although<br />

practical 40Gbit/s systems have been developed, the economic downturn <strong>in</strong> telecoms has delayed their<br />

deployment.<br />

The optical l<strong>in</strong>ks are po<strong>in</strong>t to po<strong>in</strong>t and are term<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> electronic SDH/SONET switches. The SDH/SONET<br />

layer provides network management and switch<strong>in</strong>g of the l<strong>in</strong>ks. The functions it provides <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• connection set-up<br />

• connection and l<strong>in</strong>k performance monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• management data communications<br />

• protection and restoration<br />

The network providers have a large <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> SDH/SONET equipment. The downturn <strong>in</strong> the<br />

telecommunications sector from 2000 onwards has restricted <strong>in</strong>vestment and limited expectations to more<br />

realistic horizons than those professed <strong>in</strong> the late 1990s. The implication of this is that near term <strong>in</strong>vestments are<br />

likely to be based ma<strong>in</strong>ly on SDH/SONET technology variants. Another consequence is that any new<br />

technology deployed <strong>in</strong> an exist<strong>in</strong>g network will necessarily have to work alongside SDH/SONET.<br />

As voice and data networks converge there is a force for upgrad<strong>in</strong>g SDH/SONET. Next Generation<br />

SDH/SONET is be<strong>in</strong>g employed to provide an evolutionary upgrade to legacy <strong>in</strong>frastructure by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

• virtual concatenation (VCAT) which allows services to be mapped onto several identically-sized noncontiguous<br />

low order circuits (e.g. VC4) rather than a large circuit (e.g. STM64). The separate frames<br />

may even traverse the network by different routes as they are re-assembled at a network element at the<br />

dest<strong>in</strong>ation. This gives better utilization of the network as it m<strong>in</strong>imizes isolated unusable capacity.<br />

• L<strong>in</strong>k capacity adjustment scheme (LCAS) also maximizes utilization. This is a signall<strong>in</strong>g protocol that<br />

complements VCAT as it allows hitless <strong>in</strong>-service addition of circuits to the VCAT group as more<br />

resource is required i.e. it allows the group to grow. LCAS also dynamically removes failed circuits<br />

from the group and adds other circuits to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the overall group connection.<br />

• Generic fram<strong>in</strong>g procedure which allows efficient mapp<strong>in</strong>g of any service/protocol onto the virtual<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ers, and avoids standardization delays for new services. It is a completely transparent process,<br />

has wide <strong>in</strong>dustry support and is already widely deployed.<br />

• A new control and signall<strong>in</strong>g plane called Automatic Switched Transport Network (ASTN) will allow<br />

real time provision<strong>in</strong>g and tear down of circuits<br />

• New signall<strong>in</strong>g protocols will allow automatic discovery of networks elements and will allow<br />

defragmentation of the network along with automated provision<br />

Next generation SDH (NG-SDH) improves the situation by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the capability of the edges of the network,<br />

while keep<strong>in</strong>g the core of the network essentially unchanged. It allows a higher utilization of the network<br />

resources, but the core network is still managed by a centralized control scheme. This has an impact <strong>in</strong> the<br />

scalability of the network.<br />

One approach to improve matters borrows from data network<strong>in</strong>g ideas and distributes the management. This is<br />

called Multi-Protocol Label Switch<strong>in</strong>g (MPLS). Here the nodes have local knowledge of their neighbourhoods<br />

and switch/route <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g data streams accord<strong>in</strong>gly. Carrier class functions such as restoration are also provided<br />

and managed locally. MPLS can be thought of as provid<strong>in</strong>g carrier class circuit equivalents over packet based


Page 104 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

networks and thus unify<strong>in</strong>g data and voice networks. This is gather<strong>in</strong>g traction with some carriers implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />

MPLS networks 65 66 for data transmission.<br />

These techniques will improve matters and overcome near term issues <strong>in</strong> the migration of services supported by<br />

networks. In the future requirements a more fundamental change <strong>in</strong> network design will be required to support<br />

economic dynamic network<strong>in</strong>g and fast provision<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In the <strong>in</strong>termediate future, deployment of optical cross-connects would enable rout<strong>in</strong>g at the wavelength or<br />

wavelength-band level. The use of photonic switched express paths to reduce switch<strong>in</strong>g costs is facilitated by<br />

recent improvements <strong>in</strong> optical transmission, modulation and forward error correction techniques enabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

longer distances to be achieved without regeneration.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> WDM has led to the development of better, cheaper and more stable photonic technology that<br />

has permeated <strong>in</strong>to other parts of the network (e.g. metro). All the components are <strong>in</strong> place to enable WDM<br />

optical communication systems to evolve from simple po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t l<strong>in</strong>ks to complex network architectures.<br />

The wavelength-routed network solution allows the signals to rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the optical doma<strong>in</strong>. Here network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

will be achieved through the use of optical add/drop multiplexers (OADM) and optical cross-connect (OXC)<br />

nodes. Node designs are envisaged which will provide provision<strong>in</strong>g capabilities as well as protection and<br />

restoration <strong>in</strong> the optical layer. Generalised multi-protocol label switch<strong>in</strong>g (GMPLS), a control plane offer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>telligence <strong>in</strong> the optical layer, is a good candidate for rout<strong>in</strong>g and management of the traffic demands.<br />

However the choice between optical or electrical switch<strong>in</strong>g technology deployments is still an open issue.<br />

Transparent optical solutions offer attractive features associated with reduc<strong>in</strong>g unnecessary optoelectronic<br />

conversions (cost of many transponders), and allow<strong>in</strong>g transparent (bit-rate and modulation format <strong>in</strong>dependent)<br />

networks with reduced capital and operational costs. There is a large <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g electrical switch<br />

fabrics, and the SDH/SONET technology that they support. SDH/SONET also provides proven network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

features, such as fast restoration that will need to be replicated <strong>in</strong> transparent optical solutions. Development of<br />

evolutionary migration paths will be critical for deployment of these technologies <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g networks.<br />

Look<strong>in</strong>g further ahead, the research community has been focus<strong>in</strong>g on optical packet (and burst) switch<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

where packets of data are statistically multiplexed, <strong>in</strong> order to offer better bandwidth utilization. This is<br />

envisaged as the ultimate IP and WDM <strong>in</strong>tegration. There are still many technological issues with this approach<br />

to be solved, such as the lack of optical buffer<strong>in</strong>g and robust fast switch fabrics. Network<strong>in</strong>g questions here<br />

relate to the support of these switch<strong>in</strong>g technologies, whether this is to be done at backbone or regional level and<br />

the type of control plane that is required.<br />

7.4.3.2 State of the art<br />

In order to support the ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g growth of capacity demand, core networks rely on different multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

techniques. Over the years there has been an evolution from analogue to digital transmission, from<br />

Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH) to Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) and recently from SDH to<br />

SDH upon Wavelength Division Multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (WDM). Initially digital transmission was <strong>in</strong>troduced with a<br />

capacity of 2 Mbit/s (the primary multiplexers) and a granularity of 64 kbit/s 67 . A next step was to improve the<br />

transmission efficiency by allow<strong>in</strong>g higher bitrates and <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g cross-connection, so that currently, with<br />

SDH, the granularity is 155 Mbit/s and a l<strong>in</strong>e capacity of 10 Gbit/s is possible.<br />

Advances <strong>in</strong> electronic process<strong>in</strong>g could not follow the traffic growth so the next step was the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />

WDM 68 . Here currently deployed systems are capable of capacities of 1600 Gbit/s (160 wavelengths) or even<br />

more, with a granularity of 10 Gbit/s. While the capability to use 160 wavelengths allows growth capacity, few<br />

systems currently deploy the full capability.<br />

Hero experiments with WDM and OTDM 69 if plotted on a graph (see Figure 38) show that technology steps are<br />

typically <strong>in</strong>troduced at a moment when required capacity <strong>in</strong>creases are <strong>in</strong> the range of a factor 30 to 60. In order<br />

to fully support former technologies the granularity of the new technology typically co<strong>in</strong>cides with the l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

capacity of the previous technology generation.<br />

65<br />

BT Global Services: http://www.btglobalservices.com/bus<strong>in</strong>ess/global/en/about_us/our_network/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

66<br />

Interoute: http://www.<strong>in</strong>teroute.com/<br />

67<br />

64 kbit/s still forms the basic bitrate <strong>in</strong> telephony networks.<br />

68<br />

Ken-ichi Sato: Key enabl<strong>in</strong>g Tecnologies for Future Networks, Optics and Photonics News, p. 34 May 2004<br />

69<br />

R. DeSalvo et al., “Advanced Components and Sub-Systems Solutions for 40 Gb/s Transmission”, J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 20, pp.<br />

2154-2181, Dec. 2002


OTN<br />

WDM<br />

SDH<br />

PDH<br />

Teleph<br />

0.01<br />

0.1<br />

Page 105 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 38: Logarithmic graph that shows how l<strong>in</strong>k capacity has been grow<strong>in</strong>g. Switch granularity follows the<br />

growth by a multiplex<strong>in</strong>g factor of 30 to 60. By project<strong>in</strong>g this graph is obvious that after the level of 320Gbit/s<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k capacity, 10 Tbit/s l<strong>in</strong>k capacity will be <strong>in</strong>troduced with a switch granularity of 320 Gbit/s.<br />

In today’s networks services are aggregated, mapped onto frames and transported by the SDH/SONET layer,<br />

which is also responsible for management functions such as l<strong>in</strong>k and connection set-up and monitor<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

protection and restoration. The SDH/SONET frames are then transported over the <strong>in</strong>dividual optical wavelength<br />

channels. Today’s optical core networks rely on the enormous fibre transmission bandwidth, potentially larger<br />

that 25 THz, available by s<strong>in</strong>gle mode fibre deployment, with WDM the preferable multiplex<strong>in</strong>g technique.<br />

It is convenient to split the technology used <strong>in</strong> backbone networks <strong>in</strong>to three areas:<br />

• Transmission<br />

• Network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Control<br />

We will now look at the state of the art of these areas <strong>in</strong> a little more detail.<br />

7.4.3.2.1 Transmission<br />

1<br />

switch switch granularity granularity<br />

10<br />

100<br />

1000<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k l<strong>in</strong>k capacity capacity<br />

10000<br />

100000<br />

10^6<br />

Mbit/s<br />

Deployed technology<br />

The majority of currently deployed systems use 10 Gbit/s as a l<strong>in</strong>e rate. By us<strong>in</strong>g C & L bands together, each<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 80 channels, up to approx 160 channels can be provided giv<strong>in</strong>g a total capacity of 1.6 Tbit/s. Systems<br />

are available that provide an un-regenerated reach of over 4000km. All the major suppliers compete for this<br />

market 70 71 72 ,and systems have been deployed to carriers 73 . Marconi has deployed a soliton based system with<br />

80 X 10 Gbit/s wavelengths with an un-regenerated reach of 3000km. Trials have demonstrated the capability of<br />

the system with 160 wavelengths, 40 Gbit/s and 4000km reach (not all necessarily at the same time).<br />

This said the typical utilisation for carriers is short of this. Current (early 2005) l<strong>in</strong>ks have maybe 20 X 10Gbit/s<br />

channels utilized by large carriers <strong>in</strong> the core network. Although up to 160 channels may be deployed by us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the upgrade path to the L-band, it is far more likely that the carrier will deploy newer systems with other<br />

improved functionality e.g. <strong>in</strong> network management, rather than take this step.<br />

Current optical systems are typically po<strong>in</strong>t-po<strong>in</strong>t l<strong>in</strong>ks 74 . The WDM multiplex <strong>in</strong> each band is periodically<br />

amplified by optical amplifiers. The separation of these amplifiers depends on the geographical layout of<br />

facilities but is typically 100km or less. Dispersion compensation is provided on a per band basis, usually by<br />

dispersion compensat<strong>in</strong>g fibre with<strong>in</strong> amplifier sites. For most systems NRZ encod<strong>in</strong>g is used, but some systems<br />

70<br />

Nortel Network’s Optera Long Haul 1600: http://www.nortelnetworks.com/products/01/optera/long_haul/1600/collateral/56020.39-<br />

1216-02.pdf<br />

71<br />

Marconi’s Multihaul 3000:<br />

http://www.marconi.com/Home/customer_center/Products/Access/Optical%20Multservice%20Edge/Multihaul<br />

%203000/Multihaul3000_ds.pdf<br />

72<br />

Alcatel’s 1626 Light Manager: http://www.alcatel.com/doctypes/opgdatasheet/pdf/ds1626LM1a.pdf<br />

73<br />

Interoute's <strong>in</strong>tercity high speed network: http://www.<strong>in</strong>teroute.com/networks_i21.html<br />

74<br />

A moderate number of OADMs which drop a small percentage of the traffic while allow<strong>in</strong>g most of the traffic to pass through rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

optical have been deployed <strong>in</strong> the core network. They are more common <strong>in</strong> metro networks where there is less need to regenerate<br />

10^7<br />

10^8<br />

switch<br />

granularity<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

capacity<br />

switch granularity<br />

x<br />

multiplex<strong>in</strong>g factor<br />

=<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k capacity


Page 106 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

use other techniques, e.g. Marconi use RZ-solitons to boost un-regenerated systems 75 . The l<strong>in</strong>ks are term<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

by O-E conversions <strong>in</strong>to SDH equipment.<br />

Current and Available Technology – State of the Art 40 Gbit/s<br />

Transmission at speeds up to 40 Gbit/s has been demonstrated <strong>in</strong> the field, whilst total fibre capacities of more<br />

than 1 Tbit/s have been deployed <strong>in</strong> the transport network. Individual channel speeds up to 600 Gbit/s per<br />

channel transmission have been demonstrated <strong>in</strong> the laboratory. However implement<strong>in</strong>g 40 Gbit/s commercially<br />

is a different matter, <strong>in</strong>fluenced by numerous factors ma<strong>in</strong>ly by the demand and flexibility that these bit rates<br />

offer. The factors <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>dustry and market conditions, directly related to mass production, as well as many<br />

technical issues. Transmission degradations at 40 Gbit/s, such as chromatic and polarisation mode dispersion,<br />

filter<strong>in</strong>g cross-talk etc are more significant than at lower speeds. Consequently, the techniques used to<br />

compensate for these effects such as efficient amplification techniques, compensation for Polarisation Mode<br />

Dispersion (PMD) and complex Forward Error Correction (FEC) methods need to be deployed. At these bit<br />

rates PMD and dispersion compensat<strong>in</strong>g methods must be tunable. Compensation must be done on a per<br />

wavelength channel basis.<br />

These factors will play a pivotal role <strong>in</strong> the case for the cost efficiency of <strong>in</strong>tegrated systems operat<strong>in</strong>g at 40<br />

Gbit/s. The step from 2.5Gbit/s to 10Gbit/s <strong>in</strong>creased capacity by a factor of 4 and cost by only a factor of 2.5<br />

when <strong>in</strong>troduced. The transmission degradations at 40Gbit/s coupled with the perceived current overprovision of<br />

capacity <strong>in</strong> the backbone network, make the step to 40Gbit/s currently less obvious. Perversely, if 40 Gbit/s<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>s to be deployed <strong>in</strong> the metro network, because of demand, this is likely to be a strong driver for provision<br />

of 40 Gbit/s <strong>in</strong> the backbone network.<br />

Commercial 40-Gbit/s systems are currently available 76 . At the same time, the span of transmission is of crucial<br />

importance for plann<strong>in</strong>g appropriate backbone network architectures. A ma<strong>in</strong> issue is the unregenerated spans.<br />

Most current transmission systems operat<strong>in</strong>g at 2.5 Gbit/s or 10 Gbit/s require regeneration of the signal after<br />

four or five amplification stages. Some systems however, allow 10 Gbit/s transmission over 4,000 km without<br />

any regeneration 75 With the present technology, 40-Gbit/s systems could reach 1,100 km by us<strong>in</strong>g for example<br />

the CS-RZ format, with 100-GHz channel spac<strong>in</strong>g and 80 km long fibre spans. In order to avoid regeneration<br />

these systems would need dynamic dispersion post-compensation, active ga<strong>in</strong> equalisers, Raman amplification<br />

and Polarisation Mode Dispersion control. System eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g must also take account of the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure, which may use old non-optimum fibre types, and have variable amplifier spac<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Even if similar cost reductions could be f<strong>in</strong>ally achieved for the transition from 10 to 40 Gbit/s as for 2.5 to 10<br />

Gbit/s, one could not be sure of a fast replacement of 10 Gbit/s by 40 Gbit/s systems. There is a lack of money<br />

on the network providers’ side, and due to the over provision<strong>in</strong>g situation <strong>in</strong> most of the core networks there is<br />

no urgent need to <strong>in</strong>stall new capacity or replace old <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the deployed<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure has to be amortized. The <strong>in</strong>troduction of 40 Gbit/s has to be done as an evolutionary and cost<br />

effective upgrade. The less has to be changed <strong>in</strong> the fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructure the better for the deployment of 40<br />

Gbit/s. The best option would be if only at the edges of the networks, at the term<strong>in</strong>ation po<strong>in</strong>ts of the<br />

transmission l<strong>in</strong>es, additional devices have to be implemented. For <strong>in</strong>stance it would facilitate the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />

40 Gbit/s systems, if they could work on the deployed fibre <strong>in</strong>frastructure and if no additional lengths limitations<br />

compared to 10 Gbit/s systems would be <strong>in</strong>troduced.<br />

Retrofitt<strong>in</strong>g of 40 Gbit/s channels <strong>in</strong>to an exist<strong>in</strong>g 10 Gbit/s WDM transmission system can be an economically<br />

advantageous capacity upgrade scenario, if the conditions (e.g. sufficiently narrow optical spectrum of the 40<br />

Gbit/s signals or coarse enough wavelength grid spac<strong>in</strong>g) are properly accounted for 77 .<br />

75<br />

Marconi’s Multihaul 3000:<br />

http://www.marconi.com/Home/customer_center/Products/Access/Optical%20Multservice%20Edge/Multihaul<br />

%203000/Multihaul3000_ds.pdf<br />

76<br />

Lucent's LambdaXtreme Transport: http://www.lucent.com/products/solution/0,,CTID+2021-STID+10482-SOID+100175-<br />

LOCL+1,00.html<br />

77<br />

L. Ceuppens et al., “Economically Efficient Capacity upgrades with Spectrally Efficient 40 Gb/s Modulation Formats”, Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

ECOC 2003, Symposium “Is it the right time for 40 Gbit/s Systems”


7.4.3.2.2 Network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Page 107 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Deployed technology<br />

Although field trials have been made of all-optical networks, the economic downturn and its effect on the<br />

various companies with <strong>in</strong>terests on production and utilisation of these technologies have prevented deployment.<br />

So far operators are just beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to deploy primitive optical network<strong>in</strong>g techniques. In nearly all backbone<br />

networks, the network<strong>in</strong>g functions are provided by the SDH equipment <strong>in</strong> the electrical doma<strong>in</strong><br />

The truly agile optical networks described <strong>in</strong> the “Current and Available Technology – State of the Art Optical<br />

Cross Connnects” section below, require complete reconfigurability of channel provision<strong>in</strong>g. This means that<br />

they require full band tuneable lasers, tunable channel filters, reconfigurable OADMs, OXCs, and an optical<br />

control plane. It has been expressed that this type of network is not yet deployed because of the cost and<br />

reliability of tunable lasers and tunable filters.<br />

A compromise between full agility optical network and a po<strong>in</strong>t-to-po<strong>in</strong>t fixed network is offered by several<br />

companies and has already been deployed. This is an all optical network, but with fixed filter structure <strong>in</strong> the<br />

add/drop tree. In other words, these networks will have OADM, & OXCs, but us<strong>in</strong>g a fixed filter structure<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g add/drop functionality. Therefore, when add<strong>in</strong>g or remov<strong>in</strong>g a channel, the transmitter/receiver will<br />

have to be manually placed at the right access wavelength on the filter structure. The network is a static<br />

wavelength rout<strong>in</strong>g network, where the path of a channel is pre-def<strong>in</strong>ed accord<strong>in</strong>g to its wavelength, as opposed<br />

to a switched wavelength rout<strong>in</strong>g network, where the path of a particular wavelength can be dynamically<br />

assigned. Pseudo agile optical networks are typically deployed <strong>in</strong> metro networks where regeneration is less<br />

likely to be an issue.<br />

Current and Available Technology – State of the Art Optical Cross Connects<br />

Today’s telecommunications networks deploy wavelength division multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (WDM) to <strong>in</strong>terconnect discrete<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts of network topology and offer high capacity and long reach transmission capabilities. The <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />

transmitted optically but transferred across the network through l<strong>in</strong>ks that are term<strong>in</strong>ated by SDH/SONET<br />

equipment form<strong>in</strong>g r<strong>in</strong>g and mesh network topologies 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 . Such a network requires many costly<br />

optoelectronic (OEO) conversions and complicated network management result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> low scalability and slow<br />

service turn up with high <strong>in</strong>stallation, operation and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance cost 79 80 81 . Recent technology evolution gives<br />

the possibility of the WDM transport layer migrat<strong>in</strong>g from simple transmission l<strong>in</strong>ks <strong>in</strong>to an elaborate network<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g switch<strong>in</strong>g, with higher manageability, lower complexity and cost 83 84 . In such network scenarios,<br />

optical routes form connections between discrete po<strong>in</strong>t network locations through optical add/drop and crossconnect<br />

nodes 82 83 84 and provide traffic allocation, rout<strong>in</strong>g and management of the optical bandwidth. They also<br />

facilitate network expansion, traffic growth, churn and network resilience. Optical cross-connects are located at<br />

nodes cross-connect<strong>in</strong>g a number of fibre pairs and also support add and drop of local traffic provid<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terface with the service layer. To support flexible path provision<strong>in</strong>g and network resilience, OXCs will<br />

normally utilise a switch fabric to enable rout<strong>in</strong>g of any <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g channels to the appropriate output port and<br />

access to the local client traffic. Several designs have been proposed for achiev<strong>in</strong>g robust OXCs based on<br />

different switch<strong>in</strong>g technologies 82 85 86 87 88 89 90 .<br />

78 R. Ramaswami and K. N. Sivarajan, Optical Networks, A Practical Perspective. San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.<br />

79 R. Ramaswami, “Us<strong>in</strong>g All-Optical Crossconnects <strong>in</strong> the Transport Network”, (<strong>in</strong>vited), WZ1-I, OFC2001.<br />

80 A. Tzanakaki, I. Wright and S. S. Sian, “Wavelength Routed Networks: Benefits and Design Limitations”, SCI2002, Orlando, Florida,<br />

July 2002<br />

81 A. Banerjee, J. Drake, P. Lang and B. Turner, “Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switch<strong>in</strong>g: An Overview of Rout<strong>in</strong>g and Management<br />

Enhancements”, IEEE Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, pp 144-150, January 2001<br />

82 J. Lacey, “Optical cross-connect and add/drop multiplexers: technologies and applications”, (Tutorial), WT1, OFC2002.<br />

83 <strong>IST</strong> OPTIM<strong>IST</strong> consortium: Technology Trend Documents, January 2004 (www.ist-optimist.org)<br />

84 A. Tzanakaki, I. Zacharopoulos and I. Tomkos: Optical Add/Drop Multiplexers and Optical Cross-Connects for Wavelength Routed<br />

Networks, ICTON 2002<br />

85<br />

A. Tzanakaki, I. Zacharopoulos and I. Tomkos, “Near and longer term architectural designs for OXCs/OADMs/Network topologies”,<br />

Invited paper, “Photonics <strong>in</strong> Switch<strong>in</strong>g conference” Paris, October 2003<br />

86<br />

G. Wilfong, B. Mikkelsen, C. Doerr, and M. Zirngibl, “WDM Cross-Connect Architectures with Reduced Complexity”, J. Lightwave<br />

Technology Vol. 17, pp. 1732 - 1741, October 1999<br />

87<br />

E. Iannone, and R. Sabella, “Optical Path Technologies: A Comparison Among Different Cross-Connect Architectures”, J. Lightwave<br />

Technology Vol. 14, pp. 2184 - 2196, October 1996<br />

88<br />

P. B. Chu, S.-S. Lee, and S. Park, “MEMS: The path to large opticalcross-connects,” IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 80–87, Mar. 2002.<br />

Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 10, pp. 896–898, June 1998.<br />

89<br />

D. J. Bishop, C. R. Giles, and G. P. Aust<strong>in</strong>, “The Lucent lambdarouter: MEMS technology of the future here today,” IEEE Commun.<br />

Mag., pp. 75–79, Mar. 2002.<br />

90<br />

P. De Dobbelaere, K. Falta, L. Fan, S. Gloeckner, and S. Patra, “Digital MEMS for optical switch<strong>in</strong>g,” IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 88–95,<br />

Mar. 2002.


Page 108 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Thus a key network element <strong>in</strong> the development of flexible high capacity backbone networks is the optical<br />

cross-connect (OXC). The ma<strong>in</strong> function of the OXC is to provide flexible connectivity between wavelengths on<br />

different fiber ports <strong>in</strong> a wavelength-routed network. Current technology characterises an OXC as a function of<br />

the transparency of the switch<strong>in</strong>g technology, e.g. opaque OXC and transparent OXC.<br />

The first [opaque] is a digital cross-connect equipped with optical <strong>in</strong>terfaces; they are sometimes referred to as<br />

OEO (Optical-Electrical-Optical) switches and are widely available from many vendors. Opaque OXCs are<br />

either based on electrical switch<strong>in</strong>g technology or on optical switch fabrics surrounded by (expensive) OEO<br />

conversions. In OXCs us<strong>in</strong>g electrical switch<strong>in</strong>g, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the technology and architecture, sub-wavelength<br />

switch<strong>in</strong>g granularities can be supported provid<strong>in</strong>g edge and <strong>in</strong>termediate groom<strong>in</strong>g capabilities for more<br />

efficient bandwidth utilisation. Opaque OXCs also offer regeneration, wavelength conversion and bit-level<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In transparent OXCs the <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g signals are routed transparently through an optical switch fabric without the<br />

requirement of optoelectronic conversions. The switch<strong>in</strong>g granularity may vary and support switch<strong>in</strong>g at the<br />

fibre, the wavelength band or the wavelength channel level. Although some years ago vendors were focus<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

transparent OXCs (Diamond Wave, Lucent LambdaRouter, Calient) to date more vendors offer opaque solutions<br />

(Tellium Aurora, Alcatel 1674 Lambda Gate) 91 92 93 94 .<br />

Rapid advances <strong>in</strong> WDM technology have brought about a tremendous growth <strong>in</strong> the required size of the OXC<br />

together with cost and the complexity and control 95 96 . As the DWDM technology has matured, it has brought<br />

about expansion of the number of ports of cross connects (optical and electronic). The number of network<br />

wavelengths has <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> order to meet capacity demands. In the future, WDM networks of up to 1000<br />

wavelengths may be deployed to fully exploit the available fibre spectrum 97 . In such a scenario an optical crossconnect<br />

for bands of wavelengths, i.e. a waveband cross-connect (WBXC) has been proposed 98 99 100 . In 101 102 103 a<br />

multi-granularity OXC is designed on the basis that only a fraction of the <strong>in</strong>put traffic needs to be switched <strong>in</strong><br />

any particular node<br />

Lack of standardisation is still an issue for OXC deployment, although most of the vendors announce G-MPLS<br />

compliance, many require centralised management systems to set up and tear down connections.<br />

7.4.3.2.3 Control<br />

Deployed Technology – SDH/SONET and Next Generation SDH/SONET<br />

Although a few networks are be<strong>in</strong>g deployed which use MPLS for data transport 104 105 the vast majority of<br />

deployed networks currently use SDH/SONET to transport both data and voice through the network. Optical<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ks are typically po<strong>in</strong>t-po<strong>in</strong>t and are term<strong>in</strong>ated with SDH/SONET switch<strong>in</strong>g equipment. SDH/SONET<br />

manages the physical equipment and l<strong>in</strong>ks with<strong>in</strong> the network. Incom<strong>in</strong>g data is assembled <strong>in</strong>to frames, which<br />

also carry associated management data for transmission across the network. SDH/SONET sets-up the connection<br />

for the frames, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s knowledge of the network status and provides protection and restoration dur<strong>in</strong>g failure.<br />

Currently Next Generation SDH is gather<strong>in</strong>g traction. This is a variation of SDH/SONET where the edge nodes<br />

are upgraded <strong>in</strong>itially. Migration of the core elements of the network to NG SDH/SONET can occur later. It has<br />

91 Ciena’s CoreDirector http://www.ciena.com/products/coredirector/coredirector.htm<br />

92 Cisco ONS 15454: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/optical/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

93 Alcatels Lambda Gate: http://www.alcatel.fr/products/productsummary.jhtml?relativePath=/x/opgproduct/1674.jhtml<br />

94 Diamond Wave: http://www.calient.net/products or http://www.calient.net/solutions<br />

95 X. Cao, V. Anand C. Qiao, Waveband Switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Optical Networks, IEEE Comm. Magaz. April 2003, p 105-112<br />

96 L. Noirie, M. Vigoureux, and E. Dotaro, “Impact of <strong>in</strong>termediate group<strong>in</strong>g on the dimension<strong>in</strong>g of multi-granularity optical networks,” <strong>in</strong><br />

Proc. OFC, 2001, p. TuG3-3<br />

97<br />

<strong>IST</strong> OPTIM<strong>IST</strong> consortium: Technology Trend Documents, January 2004 (www.ist-optimist.org)<br />

98<br />

K. Harada, K. Shimizu, T. Kudou, and T. Ozeki, “Hierarchical optical path cross-connect systems for large scale WDM networks,” <strong>in</strong><br />

Proc.—OFC, 1999, p. WM55-3.<br />

99<br />

O. Gerstel, R. Ramaswami, and W. Wang, “Mak<strong>in</strong>g use of a two stage multiplex<strong>in</strong>g scheme <strong>in</strong> a WDM network,” <strong>in</strong> Proc.—OFC, 2000,<br />

p. ThD1-3.<br />

100 M. Lee, J. Yu, Y. Kim, C. Kang, and J. Park, “Design of hierarchical crossconnect WDM networks employ<strong>in</strong>g a two-stage multiplex<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scheme of waveband and wavelength,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 20, pp. 166–171, Jan. 2002.<br />

101 X. Cao, Y. Xiong, V. Anand, and C. Qiao, “Wavelength band switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> multi-granular all-optical networks,” <strong>in</strong> SPIE Proc.<br />

OptiComm’02, vol. 4874, Boston, MA, 2002, pp. 198–210.<br />

102 R. Izmailov, S. Ganguly, Y. Suemura, I. Nishioka, Y. Maeno, and S. Araki, “Waveband rout<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> optical networks,” presented at the<br />

IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications (ICC’02), New York, 2002.<br />

103 X. Cao, V. Anand C. Qiao, A Waveband Switch<strong>in</strong>g Architecture and Algorithm for Dynamic Traffic IEEE COMMUNICATIONS<br />

LETTERS, VOL. 7, NO. 8, AUGUST 2003p. 397<br />

104 BT Global Services: http://www.btglobalservices.com/bus<strong>in</strong>ess/global/en/about_us/our_network/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

105 Interoute: http://www.<strong>in</strong>teroute.com/


Page 109 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

been designed to solve some issues which occur <strong>in</strong> standard SDH/SONET associated with the slow circuit<br />

provision, the difficulty <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g a large contiguous capacity required by some connections, and the<br />

<strong>in</strong>efficient fragmentation of the network as some capacity can get stranded.<br />

The major evolutions <strong>in</strong> NG SDH/SONET are the <strong>in</strong>troduction of:<br />

• virtual concatenation (VCAT). This allows services to be mapped onto several identically-sized noncontiguous<br />

low order circuits (e.g. VC4) rather than a large circuit (e.g. STM64). The separate frames<br />

may even traverse the network by different routes as they are re-assembled at a network element at the<br />

dest<strong>in</strong>ation. This gives better utilization of the network as it m<strong>in</strong>imizes isolated unusable capacity.<br />

• L<strong>in</strong>k capacity adjustment scheme (LCAS). This is a signall<strong>in</strong>g protocol that complements VCAT as it<br />

allows hitless <strong>in</strong>-service addition of circuits to the VCAT group as more resource is required i.e. it<br />

allows the group to grow. LCAS also dynamically removes failed circuits from the group and adds<br />

other circuits to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the overall group connection. LCAS is particularly attractive to carriers for<br />

protection and restoration. Loss of one VCAT member from the group can be accounted for and<br />

recovered from us<strong>in</strong>g the LCAS management. If the channel is transmitt<strong>in</strong>g at less than its peak rate,<br />

the surviv<strong>in</strong>g members may be able to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the connection. If the capacity <strong>in</strong> the surviv<strong>in</strong>g group is<br />

not sufficient more members may be added.<br />

• Generic fram<strong>in</strong>g procedure which allows efficient mapp<strong>in</strong>g of any service/protocol onto the virtual<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ers, and avoids standardization delays for new services.<br />

• A new control and signall<strong>in</strong>g plane called Automatic Switched Transport Network (ASTN) allows real<br />

time provision<strong>in</strong>g and tear down of circuits<br />

• New signall<strong>in</strong>g protocols which allow automatic discovery of networks elements and will allow<br />

defragmentation of the network along with automated provision<br />

Current and Available Technology – State of the Art G-MPLS and IP<br />

The current push <strong>in</strong> the control plane is to automate dynamic provision<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the network 106 . From both operator<br />

and customer viewpo<strong>in</strong>ts there are clear benefits as this allows fast provision<strong>in</strong>g of circuits which br<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

stream new services and revenue streams. Further traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g can allow more efficient use of the<br />

networks and protection to be efficiently allocated. Automat<strong>in</strong>g the control function also removes the potential<br />

for human error. Other desired features that <strong>in</strong>cluded are automatic network discovery, and standardized<br />

<strong>in</strong>terfaces between networks for <strong>in</strong>ter-operability.<br />

There are two solutions be<strong>in</strong>g developed via standards bodies. These solutions use different approaches to form<br />

the control plane <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with their orig<strong>in</strong>s. The two are not mutually exclusive, although much work will need to<br />

be done on the details to allow them to work together 107 .<br />

The Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) orig<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>in</strong> the ITU. This uses a top down approach to<br />

def<strong>in</strong>e the architecture of the control plane. The top level requirements are def<strong>in</strong>ed and these then cascade down<br />

to the requirements for the <strong>in</strong>dividual components. The def<strong>in</strong>itions cover the control plane architecture,<br />

signall<strong>in</strong>g, rout<strong>in</strong>g and network discovery. Network discovery as well as <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of physical l<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

also implies the detection of resource and service discovery <strong>in</strong> the higher layers of the network. The standard<br />

does not def<strong>in</strong>e protocols (although the ITU is work<strong>in</strong>g on compliant protocols). Protocols can be compared to<br />

the requirements to see if they are “ASON compliant”.<br />

The IETF has developed Generalised Multi-Protocol Label Switch<strong>in</strong>g (G-MPLS). This has it orig<strong>in</strong> on MPLS,<br />

which is a forward<strong>in</strong>g scheme whereby a packet has a label associated with it. When it enters a switch its output<br />

port and output label is found from a look-up table accord<strong>in</strong>g to its <strong>in</strong>put port and <strong>in</strong>put label. To orig<strong>in</strong>ate a<br />

connection the relevant switches have to have suitable entries placed <strong>in</strong> their lookup tables, and when the<br />

connection is torn down these entries are removed. The result<strong>in</strong>g path is called a Label Switched Path (LSP).<br />

This scheme has a benefit when compared to schemes based on the dest<strong>in</strong>ation IP address, as the lookup tables<br />

are smaller and therefore latency <strong>in</strong> the switch is reduced. G-MPLS expands these techniques <strong>in</strong> recognition that<br />

as well as data labels such properties as wavelength of light and slot position <strong>in</strong> a TDM signal can def<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

route to be taken and these are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the technique. The set of protocol <strong>in</strong> G-MPLS <strong>in</strong>cludes ones for<br />

signall<strong>in</strong>g rout<strong>in</strong>g and l<strong>in</strong>k management and discovery.<br />

106<br />

A.Jajszczyk, “Automatically switched optical networks: Benefits and requirements” IEEE Optical communications, pp S10-S15, Feb<br />

2005<br />

107<br />

N. Lark<strong>in</strong>, “ASON and GMPLS – The Battle of the Optical Control Plane”, White Paper,<br />

http://www.dataconnection.com/products/whitepapers.htm


Page 110 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Both techniques as def<strong>in</strong>ed need not be limited to optical communication. However s<strong>in</strong>ce optical transport is an<br />

<strong>in</strong>herently analogue process, care will need to be taken that an optical signal <strong>in</strong> a network does not degrade to be<br />

unrecoverable before it is regenerated. This has begun to be addressed by some researchers 108 .<br />

7.4.3.3 Issues and trends<br />

Perhaps the most important issue, currently, is the state of the economic environment, for the network providers.<br />

The situation after the bubble of the early years of the 21 st century means that for the foreseeable future<br />

providers will only <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> and deploy technology that will <strong>in</strong>crease their bottom l<strong>in</strong>e; this will be either by<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g new value added services, or capacity to <strong>in</strong>crease revenue, or by reduc<strong>in</strong>g operational cost perhaps<br />

by remov<strong>in</strong>g layers of the protocol stack.<br />

That said the research community is still strong and is develop<strong>in</strong>g technologies that will improve both these<br />

areas. Aga<strong>in</strong> it is helpful to break the trends down <strong>in</strong>to the 3 sections.<br />

7.4.3.3.1 Transmission<br />

Future Technology - Research Trends Capacity & Transparent Reach<br />

Research <strong>in</strong> this area has contracted s<strong>in</strong>ce the bubble, however it is still vibrant with sessions <strong>in</strong> OFC 2005<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g titles of “40Gb/s and beyond”, “Modulation techniques” and “Ultra Long Haul” along with other<br />

contributory areas. Thus the transmission technologists are still research<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to how to send more and more<br />

bandwidth along greater distances before regeneration.<br />

OFC 2005 highlights <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Spectral efficiency improvement by demodulation of 40 Gbit/s polarization multiplexed signals with 16<br />

GHz spac<strong>in</strong>g 109<br />

• Spectral efficency improvement by us<strong>in</strong>g a super-cont<strong>in</strong>uum source to generate 1022 X 2.5Gbit/s with<br />

6.25 GHz spac<strong>in</strong>g over 116km 110<br />

• Transmission of 18 X 40Gbit/s over 6250km of conventional NZ-DSF 111<br />

• A field demonstration of a 160Gbit/s OTDM signal over 200 km 112<br />

• A field demonstration of 8 X 160Gbit/s transmission over 430km and <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to PMD<br />

compensation 113<br />

• A 320 Gbit/s OTDM transmission over 80km of fibre 114<br />

Interest<strong>in</strong>gly there is a comment from a 2004 OFC workshop reported <strong>in</strong> JLT 115 , that at bit rates above 2.5Gbit/s<br />

the <strong>in</strong>teraction between dispersion and nonl<strong>in</strong>earities becomes crucial and the way the dispersion is managed<br />

along a l<strong>in</strong>k becomes as important as the dispersion itself. Thus it is likely that a move to higher and higher bit<br />

rates will conflict with the desire for all-optical network<strong>in</strong>g described above. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly the move to higher bit<br />

rates will limit the transparent diameter of the signal.<br />

Other themes appear to be how to take cost out of the network with several papers replac<strong>in</strong>g fibre based<br />

dispersion compensation systems along the transmission fibre, with electronic based methods 116 117 , optical phase<br />

conjugation 118 or chirped lasers 119 .<br />

108 B. Peeters et al, “Optimal Rout<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hybrid networks by decoupl<strong>in</strong>g the route calaculation from the assessment of optical route<br />

viability”, NOC 2004, E<strong>in</strong>dhoven, The Netherlands, June 29– July 1, 2004<br />

109 S. Tsukamoto et al., “Coherent Demodulation of 40-Gbit/s Polarization-Multiplexed QPSK Signals with 16-GHz Spac<strong>in</strong>g after 200-km<br />

Transmission”, OFC 2005, Paper PDP29, 2005<br />

110 T. Ohara et al.. “Over 1000 channel, 6.25 GHz-spaced ultra-DWDM transmission with supercont<strong>in</strong>uum multi-carrier source”, OFC 2005,<br />

Paper OWA6, 2005<br />

111 J.-X Cai et al., “Transmission of 40Gbit/s WDM Signals over 6,250 km of Conventional NZ-DSF with >4 dB FEC Marg<strong>in</strong>”, OFC 2005,<br />

Paper PDP26, 2005<br />

112<br />

T. Miyazaki et al., “Field Demonstration of 160-Gb/s OTDM Signal Us<strong>in</strong>g Eight 20-Gb/s 2-bit/symbol Channels over 200 km”, OFC<br />

2005, Paper OFF1, 2005<br />

113<br />

R. Leppla et al., “ PMD Tolerance of 8x170 Gbit/s Field Transmission Experiment over 430 km SSMF with and without PMDC”, OFC<br />

2005, Paper OFF2, 2005<br />

114<br />

A.I. Siahlo et al., “320 Gb/s S<strong>in</strong>gle-polarization OTDM Transmission over 80 km Standard Transmission Fiber”, OFC 2005, Paper<br />

OFF3, 2005<br />

115 J. Livas, “Optical Transmission Evolution: From Digital to Analog to ? Network Tradeoffs Between Optical Transparency and Reduced<br />

Regeneration Cost”, ”, J. Lightwave Technology Vol. 23, pp. 219 - 224, January 2005<br />

116 A.H. Gnauck et al., “L<strong>in</strong>ear Microwave-Doma<strong>in</strong> Dispersion Compensation of 10-Gb/s Signals us<strong>in</strong>g Heterodyne Detection”, OFC 2005,<br />

Paper PDP31, 2005<br />

117 D. McGhan et al., “5120 km RZ-DPSK transmission over G652 fiber at 10 Gb/s with no optical dispersion compensation”, OFC 2005,<br />

Paper PDP27, 2005


Page 111 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Private conversations with Prof. Takis Hadjifotiou have identified the follow<strong>in</strong>g additional research trends:<br />

• Electronic mux<strong>in</strong>g/demux<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g III-V semiconductors to achieve approximately 80Gbit/s<br />

• The need for optical mux<strong>in</strong>g/demux<strong>in</strong>g to atta<strong>in</strong> 160 Gbit/s<br />

• use of fibre optics for mux<strong>in</strong>g generates big problems on polarisation control and coherent mix<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

• Pulse generation<br />

• also problematic with mode lock<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>g the probable technique for pulse generation<br />

• Optical demultiplex<strong>in</strong>g at the receiver needs optical IC with optical gates (such as EAM) and an<br />

excellent clock extraction subsystem<br />

• Bit rate per tributary to 160 Gbit/s stream or higher can be 10, 40 or even 80 Gbit/s<br />

• 10 Gbit/s is preferable because of the low cost compared to 40 Gbit/s and straight through connection<br />

options<br />

• 160 Gbit/s is difficult to network because of the small tolerances required and the granularity. There is<br />

a virtual impossibility of dropp<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g tributaries. This is <strong>in</strong> broad agreement with paragraph<br />

2 above<br />

• Electronic signal process<strong>in</strong>g is now possible at ~ 10 Gbit/s and this will represent a paradigm shift <strong>in</strong><br />

the design of optical systems.<br />

7.4.3.3.2 Network<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Future Technology – Research Trends Optical Packet and Burst Switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

WDM is deployed to support the ever-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g capacity demand. Even if circuit switched optical networks are<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced, access to the optical bandwidth will still be provided with waveband/wavelength granularity. In<br />

particular, future optical networks should be able to serve a client layer that <strong>in</strong>cludes packet based networks with<br />

highly dynamic connection patterns such as the <strong>in</strong>ternet 120 121 . Data-related traffic is already tak<strong>in</strong>g over from<br />

voice-related traffic <strong>in</strong> the network, and due to demand burst<strong>in</strong>ess a transport network based on circuit switch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

may not be able to offer the required flexibility 122 123 .<br />

Also the range of future services will be very diverse <strong>in</strong> terms of required channel capacity channel occupancy,<br />

duration set-up time and frequency. 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 .<br />

Optical packet (and burst) switch<strong>in</strong>g like its electronic counter part has been suggested as a switch<strong>in</strong>g paradigm<br />

that will efficiently utilise the available fibre bandwidth, by statistically multiplex<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation from different<br />

118 S.L. Jansen et al., “10,200km 22x2x10Gbit/s RZ-DQPSK Dense WDM Transmission without Inl<strong>in</strong>e Dispersion Compensation through<br />

Optical Phase Conjugation”, OFC 2005, Paper PDP28, 2005<br />

119 S. Chandrasekhar et al., “Flexible transport at 10-Gb/s from 0 to 675km (11,500ps/nm) us<strong>in</strong>g a chirp-managed laser, no DCF, and a<br />

dynamically adjustable dispersion-compensat<strong>in</strong>g receiver”, OFC 2005, Paper PDP30, 2005<br />

120 S. Dixit ed.: IP over WDM, Build<strong>in</strong>g the Next Generation Optical Internet, J. Willey and Sons, 2003<br />

121 Moises R. N. Ribeiro: Traffic Prioritisation <strong>in</strong> Photonic Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g, PhD Thesis, University of Essex, June 2002<br />

122 <strong>IST</strong> OPTIM<strong>IST</strong> consortium: EU Photonic Roadmap, Key Issues for Optical Network<strong>in</strong>g, January 2004 (www.ist-optimist.org)<br />

123 R. Inkret, A. Kuchar, B. Mikac: Advanced Infrastructure for Photonic Networks: Extended F<strong>in</strong>al Report of Cost Action 266, 2003<br />

124 Blumenthal D. J., P. R. Pructnal, and J. R. Sauer, “Photonic packet switches: architecture and experimental implementations”,<br />

Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of IEEE, Vol 82, No.11, Nov. 1994<br />

125 D J Blumenthal et al, “All-Optical Label Swapp<strong>in</strong>g Networks and Technologies”, JLT Vol 18, No 12, Dec 2000<br />

126 Tucker, RS et al, “Photonic Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g: An Overview”, IECE Trans Commun, Vol E82-B, Feb 1999<br />

127 S Yao et alia, “Advances <strong>in</strong> Photonic Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g”, IEEE Comms Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, Feb 2000<br />

128 MJ.OMahony, D.Simeonidou, D Hunter, A Tzanakaki, "The Application of Optical Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Future Communication<br />

Networks", IEEE Comms Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, pp128-135, March 2001<br />

129 T. S. El-Bawab, S. Jong-Dug: Optical packet switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> core networks: between vision and reality, Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, IEEE,<br />

Volume: 40, Issue: 9, Sep 2002, Pages: 60 – 65<br />

130 X. Lisong H. G. Perros, G. Rouskas,: Techniques for optical packet switch<strong>in</strong>g and optical burst switch<strong>in</strong>g Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

IEEE , Volume: 39 , Issue: 1 , Jan. 2001, Pages:136 – 142<br />

131 D. Hunter, I. Andonovic: Approaches to optical Internet packet switch<strong>in</strong>g Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, IEEE, Volume: 38, Issue: 9, Sept.<br />

2000 Pages: 116 – 122<br />

132 S. Yao, B. Mukherjee, S. Dixit: Advances <strong>in</strong> photonic packet switch<strong>in</strong>g: an overview, Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, IEEE , Volume: 38 ,<br />

Issue: 2 , Feb. 2000 Pages:84 – 94<br />

133<br />

D. Blumenthal, P. Prucnal, J. Sauer, “Photonic packet switches-architectures and experiment implementations”, IEEE Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 82,<br />

1650-1667, November 1994<br />

134<br />

M. Renaud et. Al, “Network and system concepts for optical packet switch<strong>in</strong>g” Communications Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, IEEE, Volume: 35, Issue: 4,<br />

April 1997, Pages: 96 – 102


Page 112 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

sources on the same channel 135 . As packet technology offers high granularity it facilitates the convergence of<br />

electronic and optical technologies <strong>in</strong> an IP-centric networks. Improved networked economics can be achieved<br />

via efficient bandwidth utilization but also through simplification of management and control 136 .<br />

These arguments for the use of photonic packet switch<strong>in</strong>g are from the network po<strong>in</strong>t of view 137 138 . There are<br />

also important roles to be played by optics <strong>in</strong> electronic nodes that may possibly po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the direction of<br />

photonic switch<strong>in</strong>g nodes. Until recently port speed of electronic nodes had to follow the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

transmission bit rate. After the advent of WDM, node capacity could be <strong>in</strong>creased not only by upgrad<strong>in</strong>g bit-rate<br />

per port but the number of wavelengths. Unfortunately this solution does not solve every problem for terabit<br />

router design as node dimension will possibly reach a three figure number which will <strong>in</strong> turn br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

problems of multi stage <strong>in</strong>terconnection (power consumption, footpr<strong>in</strong>t, electromagnetic <strong>in</strong>terference 137 ).<br />

Consequently optical parallel <strong>in</strong>terconnection is already <strong>in</strong> the majority terabit routers as a means to <strong>in</strong>terconnect<br />

the multiple stages and to reduce the number of ports 137 . Once <strong>in</strong>terconnections are made optically, it is<br />

reasonable to imag<strong>in</strong>e an optical transparent central stage without OEO conversions and ultimately transparent<br />

photonic switch<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>lets to outlets. Some router vendors have already <strong>in</strong>troduced optical switch<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

capacity expansion 139 . It is evident that this evolution scenario depends, at least, on the availability of robust<br />

fast, i.e. ns, and preferably completely transparent optical switches and feasibility of contention resolution<br />

techniques 140 .<br />

7.4.3.3.3 Control<br />

The size of future core network dictates that upgrades are done gradually. Hence, future networks will be<br />

heterogeneous, which is the ma<strong>in</strong> challenge for development of core-network control platforms. Thus although<br />

the technical solutions for control are progress<strong>in</strong>g well, the major challenges are related to the <strong>in</strong>terfaces<br />

between different doma<strong>in</strong>s. The challenges can be summarized as:<br />

• Standards for <strong>in</strong>teroperability<br />

• Mapp<strong>in</strong>g application need (QoS) to network requirements<br />

• Resiliency mechanisms.<br />

• Control plane process<strong>in</strong>g requirements<br />

The two proposals for optical control platforms, ASON and GMPLS, are likely to coexist <strong>in</strong> the network and<br />

hence a scheme for <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g is required <strong>in</strong> order to dynamically deploy end-to-end connections. Figure 39<br />

illustrates one obvious scenario <strong>in</strong> which the different operators / adm<strong>in</strong>istrates use different network platforms.<br />

Workstation<br />

Operator 1<br />

GMPLS<br />

Operator 2<br />

ASON<br />

Operator 3<br />

GMPLS<br />

Figure 39 Interwork<strong>in</strong>g requirements between different operators’ doma<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Workstation<br />

As well as the <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g of the different platforms, related scenarios <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• Interconnection of different vendor’s implementation of the same platform<br />

• Interconnection of adm<strong>in</strong>istrative doma<strong>in</strong>s us<strong>in</strong>g the same control platform<br />

• Interconnections of doma<strong>in</strong>s us<strong>in</strong>g identical platform but based on different transmission technologies<br />

(e.g., different versions of NG SDH/SONET).<br />

This requires specification and standardization of suitable <strong>in</strong>ter-platform-<strong>in</strong>terfaces. The <strong>in</strong>terconnection might<br />

require special gateways act<strong>in</strong>g as control plane proxies.<br />

135 <strong>IST</strong> OPTIM<strong>IST</strong> consortium: EU Photonic Roadmap, Key Issues for Optical Network<strong>in</strong>g, January 2004 (www.ist-optimist.org)<br />

136 M. O’Mahony: Optical Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g, Short Course, ECOC 2004<br />

137 Moises R. N. Ribeiro: Traffic Prioritisation <strong>in</strong> Photonic Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g, PhD Thesis, University of Essex, June 2002<br />

138 Q. Yang, K. Bergman: ‘Performances of the Data Vortex switch architecture under nonuniform and bursty traffic Lightwave<br />

Technology, Journal of , Volume: 20 , Issue: 8 , Aug. 2002 Pages:1242 – 1247<br />

139 Chiaro [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: www.chiaro.com<br />

140 Ste<strong>in</strong>ar Bjornstad: Packet Switch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> optical Networks, Doctoral Thesis at NTNU, 2004:101


Page 113 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

QoS requirements will become more important and is an issue. This <strong>in</strong>cludes mapp<strong>in</strong>g the packet switched<br />

IP/MPLS traffic flows onto circuit switched ASON / GMPLS connections and ensur<strong>in</strong>g that the application<br />

requirements are met for the end-end connection.<br />

Protection is also an issue. Dynamic protection schemes are widely used <strong>in</strong> r<strong>in</strong>g network topologies but are<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on manually provisioned back-up capacity. Automat<strong>in</strong>g the setup of backup paths and enabl<strong>in</strong>g it<br />

to work on meshed network topologies will enable a much more efficient use of network /transmission &<br />

switch<strong>in</strong>g capacity and elim<strong>in</strong>ate human errors <strong>in</strong> back-up path provision<strong>in</strong>g. However this will require<br />

development and verification of new control plane algorithms. Perhaps verification is the hardest issue here to<br />

ensure that critical connections are restored under all possible conditions.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally dynamic provision<strong>in</strong>g of connections and dynamic protection mechanisms <strong>in</strong>creases substantially the<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g requirements to the control plane. Thus, process<strong>in</strong>g power is a potential bottleneck <strong>in</strong> future,<br />

heterogeneous optical, core networks. Perhaps distributed techniques which parcel out the problem could be<br />

used. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly the networks are likely to be adm<strong>in</strong>istered as separate <strong>in</strong>dependent doma<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

7.4.3.4 Gap analysis<br />

The evolution of optical networks, as described below <strong>in</strong>volves the migration from voice centric designs to data<br />

centric designs. Initial changes will be based on enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the capability of SDH with the step to next<br />

generation SDH to allow more efficient use of the network and to step from a static to semi-dynamic situation.<br />

The control plane will also evolve to Automatically Switched Optical Networks and/or G-MPLS. Much work<br />

has been done to def<strong>in</strong>e these control methods. These techniques are not exclusive, but some detail will need to<br />

be sorted to allow them to work together and for different vendors’ platforms to <strong>in</strong>terwork. In addition these<br />

networks will need to address end-end quality of service requirements, efficient restoration without reserved<br />

hardware and dynamic allocation strategies.<br />

All the technologies have been developed to allow an optical cross connect overlay to pass through traffic<br />

without dropp<strong>in</strong>g down to the electrical layer and this is the next obvious step. Although <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple this could<br />

be achieved today it is a revolutionary step rather than evolutionary. It is to be expected that there will be some<br />

development necessary to f<strong>in</strong>d the optimum technique and much verification of the technology will be required<br />

by the carriers before <strong>in</strong>stallation.<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al step <strong>in</strong> the replacement of the legacy SDH equipment <strong>in</strong> the add/drop by MPLS routers.<br />

7.4.3.5 Roadmap<br />

Near Term<br />

The current position is that networks are still ma<strong>in</strong>ly optimised for voice, although s<strong>in</strong>ce 2002 data traffic has<br />

exceeded voice traffic. Data traffic has a very different nature to voice traffic with short set up times and<br />

connection durations and has different statistics with a bursty nature, so a traditional circuit switched network is<br />

not apt.<br />

Current networks use SDH which is a fram<strong>in</strong>g technique with good overheads which allow excellent monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of traffic. SDH uses 2Mbit/s frames of 64 kbit/s voice channels which are multiplexed up to 155 Mbit/s and then<br />

up to 10 Gbit/s. In the core network, pipes are set up between nodes (Metro r<strong>in</strong>gs for example) to carry traffic at<br />

bit rates up to 10Gbit/s. The pipes are <strong>in</strong>ter-connected at major nodes (cities). Most traffic passes through (<strong>in</strong> the<br />

UK 70%) and a little is dropped and added. Traffic with<strong>in</strong> these pipes is <strong>in</strong>terconnected by electronic digital<br />

cross-connects at a granularity level of 155 Mbit/s.<br />

So the current position has the network comprised of optical WDM transmission between nodes with crossconnection<br />

achieved electrically. Each wavelength carries 10 Gbit/s. A centralised management system sets up<br />

route us<strong>in</strong>g the signall<strong>in</strong>g system. New fibres can be added to augment routes, but this is done manually <strong>in</strong><br />

exchanges and is slow, so the system is essentially static.<br />

Channel transmission rates may evolve from 10 Gbit/s to 40 Gbit/s but this is only likely if the economics of<br />

such a move make it advantageous to the carrier, or if the demand <strong>in</strong> the metro circuits causes the <strong>in</strong>stallation of<br />

40 Gbit/s to occur there. There will be a trade off between the bit rate and the un-repeatered reach and this will<br />

have implications migration to optical network<strong>in</strong>g described below. Thus carriers consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> 40<br />

Gbit/s will need to take a holistic long term view of their network evolution before mak<strong>in</strong>g a choice.<br />

For data the IP packets are loaded either directly <strong>in</strong>to the SDH frames or via ATM cells. Large packets are<br />

fragmented at the source and reassembled at the s<strong>in</strong>k. The SDH format was designed for voice networks and is<br />

not ideal for large data transfers. The network can get fragmented with isolated frames exist<strong>in</strong>g around the


Page 114 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

network which could support data, but are not contiguous. A few years ago it was envisaged that SDH would<br />

rapidly be replaced, but the collapse of the bubble along with the massive <strong>in</strong>vestment of SDH has caused a great<br />

reth<strong>in</strong>k.<br />

Work is underway on Next Generation SDH (NG-SDH) <strong>in</strong> which frames have virtual concatenation. At the edge<br />

of the network frames are identified as (virtually) contiguous; they may traverse different paths through the<br />

network, but are re-assembled at the end node. This allows large data volumes to be transferred efficiently by<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g use of the previously isolated frames. Auto-discovery of the network and connectivity is another<br />

benefit <strong>in</strong>troduced and the <strong>in</strong>troduction of a control and signall<strong>in</strong>g layer, the Automatic Switched Transport<br />

Network, will allow fast set up and tear down of services and dynamic allocation of resources together with fast<br />

provision<strong>in</strong>g of end-end resources.<br />

Distributed control planes such as GMPLS will be <strong>in</strong>troduced to provide not only label switch<strong>in</strong>g, but control<br />

over wavelength channel, fibre, time-slot etc. This route represents more of a packet based rather than circuit<br />

based network implementation.<br />

Medium Term<br />

As we move <strong>in</strong>to the medium term the mix of traffic will move towards more data and less voice. We want to<br />

evolve from the near term network, so the node comprises SDH and WDM comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a router. SDH will be<br />

upgraded to have a cross-connection at 2.5Gbit/s as it is more efficient that 155 Mbit/s.<br />

The next step <strong>in</strong>volves the possible phase out of SDH and the <strong>in</strong>troduction of optical cross connects to get us<br />

towards the long term vision.<br />

Long Term<br />

Today’s end po<strong>in</strong>t of our high level vision is that with<strong>in</strong> the core network, the nodes will comprise large MPLS<br />

routers together with an optical cross-connect switch <strong>in</strong>ter-connected by DWDM fibres. This end po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

represents the <strong>in</strong>tersection of two trends:<br />

• Everyth<strong>in</strong>g is becom<strong>in</strong>g data, and the value of SDH has dim<strong>in</strong>ished ( some fram<strong>in</strong>g will still be neededthis<br />

is where GFP (generic fram<strong>in</strong>g procedure comes <strong>in</strong>) <strong>in</strong> a bid to reduce the costly number of<br />

network<br />

• At each node most of the traffic is transit (70% <strong>in</strong> UK)], thus it makes sense to bypass transit traffic<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g optical cross-connect –rather than everyth<strong>in</strong>g go<strong>in</strong>g through router.<br />

The OXC will deal with the transit traffic and drop the local traffic <strong>in</strong>to the MPLS router where it will be dealt<br />

with and forwarded. However the bursty nature of data traffic means that overlay<strong>in</strong>g the circuit network with be<br />

an optical burst switched network <strong>in</strong> which the bandwidth of a wavelength is shared between users to allow an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> efficiency through statistical multiplex<strong>in</strong>g. IP packets at the edge are assembled <strong>in</strong>to a burst. The<br />

route is set up, the burst is sent, and the route is taken down.


7.4.4 Grid networks<br />

7.4.4.1 Introduction<br />

Page 115 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

A recent technique, which has the potential to drive large amounts of data transfer over broadband networks, is<br />

grid comput<strong>in</strong>g. This is a technique where a comput<strong>in</strong>g problem is divided <strong>in</strong>to many small pieces each of which<br />

can then be calculated us<strong>in</strong>g spare processor power on many disparate platforms spread globally. The concept<br />

here is that the comput<strong>in</strong>g power is a resource that can be turned on when needed <strong>in</strong> an analogous way to the<br />

supply of electrical power to a consumer.<br />

Typically up to now the applications have been non-commercial such as the SETI@home project 141 , where the<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g power has been donated for free by will<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals. However as grid development moves<br />

forward it is likely that the applications will become more commercial such as <strong>in</strong>vestigations of new molecules<br />

for pharmaceutical purposes, and process<strong>in</strong>g power will be brokered <strong>in</strong> a market.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> requirement for applications is that they must be able to be split <strong>in</strong>to parallel elements which can be<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividually calculated before be<strong>in</strong>g aggregated to give the overall solution. One bonus of the “on tap” nature of<br />

the process<strong>in</strong>g power is that processes that previously took long periods to compute, can now be calculated <strong>in</strong><br />

virtual real time, without access to prohibitively expensive super computers.<br />

A good example of this is analysis of astronomical data. Astronomers have access to telescopes for limited<br />

periods of time. Historically, they would make their measurements and then analyse them over the months<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g. This was <strong>in</strong>efficient as they had to measure bl<strong>in</strong>d. Grid networks give the potential for the analysis to<br />

be completed while measurements are still occurr<strong>in</strong>g and for the telescopes to thus be able to be directed to<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g features dur<strong>in</strong>g the user’s time allocation.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the 1960’s we have progressed when only a few organisations could afford computers, and these had<br />

limited power, to the po<strong>in</strong>t where most Western <strong>in</strong>dividuals have more personal comput<strong>in</strong>g power at their<br />

disposal than the Apollo programme had. . The process<strong>in</strong>g power of computers still doubles every 18 months<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g the exponential curve described Moore’s Law, a corollary of this is that the cost of process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approximately halves every 18 months.<br />

One driver for progress is never be<strong>in</strong>g satisfied. The evolution we have made to solve previously <strong>in</strong>tractable<br />

problems whets our appetite to solve yet more complex challenges. Indeed the challenges <strong>in</strong> some way are<br />

provided by the <strong>in</strong>creased data provided by advanced technology that needs to be analysed.<br />

Foster states that process<strong>in</strong>g power (cost) doubles (halves) every 18 months 142 . In contrast storage power (cost)<br />

doubles (halves) every 12 months. Certa<strong>in</strong> areas generate lots of data. Particle accelerators for the <strong>in</strong>vestigation<br />

of nuclear physics and telescopes for the <strong>in</strong>vestigation of the universe are obvious examples. Petabyte data stores<br />

are already planned. This data has to be analysed and the relative rates of growth of the two sectors means that<br />

this is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>feasible at a s<strong>in</strong>gle site. F<strong>in</strong>ally he states that the power (cost) of the communications network<br />

is doubl<strong>in</strong>g (halv<strong>in</strong>g) every 9 months. If this cont<strong>in</strong>ues, data communication will become essentially free. At this<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t it becomes economic to analyse such data remotely (or to do equally computationally <strong>in</strong>tensive activities).<br />

Thus the prime drivers for grid networks are the complexity of the computation required and the m<strong>in</strong>imal cost of<br />

communications. F<strong>in</strong>ally the model requires the provision of space process<strong>in</strong>g capability not be<strong>in</strong>g used by<br />

providers to be available to users. Until this po<strong>in</strong>t this has been charitably provided, this may change as<br />

commercial users beg<strong>in</strong> to use the technology.<br />

An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g consequence of the donation or sale of space process<strong>in</strong>g cycles is that the process<strong>in</strong>g resources<br />

used are work<strong>in</strong>g more efficiently. This <strong>in</strong> turn h<strong>in</strong>ts that grid comput<strong>in</strong>g is “green” <strong>in</strong> that less physical<br />

resources must be used world wide for the same result.<br />

This argument leads to a drive for distributed comput<strong>in</strong>g of which grid comput<strong>in</strong>g is an important example.<br />

Baker 143 lists the elements that comprise a grid:<br />

• Grid fabric – this comprises all the physical resources available over the <strong>in</strong>ternet worldwide, and could<br />

comprise <strong>in</strong>dividual PCs, unix workstations, sensors such as telescopes provid<strong>in</strong>g data, storage devices<br />

and on-l<strong>in</strong>e databases. Although Baker does not specifically state it the physical communications<br />

equipment used to l<strong>in</strong>k the grid would also be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this element. The widely vary<strong>in</strong>g nature of<br />

141<br />

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/<br />

142<br />

I. Foster: “The Grid: A New Infrastructure for 21st Century Science”, Physics Today, February, 2002<br />

143<br />

M. Baker et al “Grids and Grid technologies for wide-area distributed comput<strong>in</strong>g”, Software – Practice and Experience, 2002, John<br />

Wiley and Sons Ltd


Page 116 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

the components of this gives a strong drive that the grid middleware and applications should not be<br />

platform specific.<br />

• Core grid middleware – this element is concerned with the broker<strong>in</strong>g of resources, distribution of<br />

requirements and quality assurance. Factors that must be dealt with here <strong>in</strong>clude resource discovery and<br />

management, access negotiation and trad<strong>in</strong>g, security, allocation, & quality of service.<br />

• User level grid middleware – These are the software tools that the developer can use to adapt their<br />

problem for a grid based solution. The components <strong>in</strong>clude languages, libraries and broker clients that<br />

allow the user to def<strong>in</strong>e their requirements from the transaction.<br />

• Grid applications and portals – the application is simply the problem that the user wants to solve such<br />

as a simulation or data analysis. Portals are web based services that users can submit jobs to and collect<br />

jobs from. In other words the portal acts as an <strong>in</strong>terface to the grid that the user would otherwise have<br />

to provide.<br />

It is <strong>in</strong>structive to use these four parts to look at the state of the art <strong>in</strong> grid comput<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

7.4.4.2 Grid fabric<br />

The grid fabric is what is provided (hitherto by charitable <strong>in</strong>dividuals for free) and available for the grid to use.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce this will be spare resources specified by some unknown users and the communications network of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternet, it is beyond the scope of the grid community to develop the resources further. The grid community will<br />

simple develop the agents which sit of the resources to talk to the broker and provide the software necessary for<br />

the application to operate. Note that it is paramount that these do not compromise the users’ security <strong>in</strong> anyway.<br />

The community will need to ensure that the middleware and agents can work with what is available 144 , and<br />

provides the quality of service required by both the customer 145 and the resource provider 146 .<br />

The necessary work for communication has already been done. Grid designers have no desire to re-<strong>in</strong>vent the<br />

wheel and thus will transmit the data us<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g widely dispersed standard protocols such as TCP/IP.<br />

Standard techniques can be used for encod<strong>in</strong>g the communications to keep them secure from external snoop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

It is fair to expect that the capabilities of the hardware will shadow pace with the development of comput<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

communication technology.<br />

7.4.4.3 Core grid middleware<br />

The first applications claimed to be grid applications, such as the SETI@home project 147 could equally be<br />

claimed by the peer-peer network community. Here providers donated resources by go<strong>in</strong>g to the SETI website,<br />

download<strong>in</strong>g SETI specific software and register<strong>in</strong>g. Advertis<strong>in</strong>g was by word of mouth and the <strong>in</strong>ternet<br />

grapev<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

The vision described by the current generation of grid developers is to use middleware to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> grid resource<br />

tables and broker and allocate access. Assur<strong>in</strong>g or negotiat<strong>in</strong>g the require quality of service will be part of the<br />

responsibility.<br />

144 The resources available may vary strongly with different platforms, operat<strong>in</strong>g systems, process<strong>in</strong>g power etc. It is important that the<br />

middleware can work with all this and is not prescriptive.<br />

145 The grid requires contributors to provide resources, so it is paramount that their experience is positive. Factors to consider here are<br />

• that their participation should not impact their own use of their resources or communication i.e. they have first call on the<br />

resources. The ideal situation is that the participation does not imp<strong>in</strong>ge on the owner’s experience<br />

• their security is not compromised <strong>in</strong> any way. Use of the grid is likely to <strong>in</strong>volve the push<strong>in</strong>g of software out to the resources.<br />

Middleware will need to guarantee protection by application validation<br />

• they should be free to jo<strong>in</strong> or leave at any time. Note that this implies a need for the application to be stable under unpredictable<br />

and sudden changes <strong>in</strong> the grid environment<br />

• they should only have to <strong>in</strong>stall simple software on their platforms to participate. They certa<strong>in</strong>ly should not have to change<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g system or <strong>in</strong>stall new languages<br />

146 Grid users should also have a positive experience. Some factors are:<br />

• Ease of use – for penetration the software should provide facilities for non-specialists to <strong>in</strong>put their application and the<br />

middleware to translate it <strong>in</strong>to grid compliant forms<br />

• Security – as well as with communications security, the data and application itself may need to be kept confidential from hosts<br />

147 http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/


Page 117 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

This step may even <strong>in</strong>volve some commercial transaction as an <strong>in</strong>centive for resource providers 148149 . Thus the<br />

core grid middleware along with will provide credit/bill<strong>in</strong>g functions <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the user level grid<br />

middleware. In addition the two elements will have to validate the users’ identities and ensure security both of<br />

the communication and application data and prevent malicious access to the resources.<br />

In this vision the grid is a resource that can be tapped at will by users. Individual process<strong>in</strong>g resources are l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

flexibly to the applications through the middleware rather than directly and rigidly.<br />

7.4.4.4 User level grid middleware<br />

As described above this element must work <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the core grid middleware to provide<br />

identification, security, bill<strong>in</strong>g functions and quality of service.<br />

The other ma<strong>in</strong> function of this level of software is to organise the application <strong>in</strong>to a form that the grid can deal<br />

with. The nature of the grid gives some constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the format of applications that can be used. The grid will<br />

use multiple platforms with different speeds and these may be dynamically added and dropped without warn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

either because of owner requirements or because of network issues such as failure and latency. Thus the<br />

application must be broken down <strong>in</strong>to small sections which are loosely coupl<strong>in</strong>g. Parameter sweep modell<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

a good candidate for this k<strong>in</strong>d of application, as it creates several <strong>in</strong>dependent jobs. Examples <strong>in</strong>clude analysis of<br />

different molecules for drug applications, analysis of small sections of astronomical data e.g. for spectral<br />

content, analysis of large databases to extract population data e.g. for a large supermarket to understand its sales.<br />

Groups are develop<strong>in</strong>g visual based software for users to develop their applications.<br />

7.4.4.5 Grid applications and portals<br />

The application is beyond the scope of grid development as it belongs to the user and may take any form.<br />

However it is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that the grid imposes constra<strong>in</strong>ts as described above.<br />

The user’s <strong>in</strong>teraction with the portal will allow him to post the job and receive the results. In addition it is<br />

proposed that the user will be able to specify the quality of service he requires e.g. analyse 100 molecules <strong>in</strong> 10<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes, and how much he is prepared to pay as part of the negotiation with the lower levels of software.<br />

Buyya 149 describes the 11 steps <strong>in</strong> for an application to run:<br />

• The users compose their application as a distributed application us<strong>in</strong>g visual tools<br />

• The users’ analysis and QoS requirements are submitted to the resource broker<br />

• The broker performs resource discovery based on user-def<strong>in</strong>ed characteristics <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g price<br />

• The broker identifies the list of data resources and uses optimal ones<br />

• The broker identifies the list of computational resources and selects optimal ones<br />

• The broker does a check on the user for the necessary credit and/or authorisation to use the resources<br />

• The broker schedules and deploys the job to the resources to meet the QoS requirements<br />

• The resource agents execute the jobs and return results<br />

• The broker collects the results and passes them back to the user<br />

• The broker passes the usage <strong>in</strong>formation to the account<strong>in</strong>g system for charg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• The account<strong>in</strong>g system reports share allocation or credit usage to the user.<br />

7.4.4.6 State of the Art<br />

There are several groups work<strong>in</strong>g on grid development. Some of the more notable ones are:<br />

• Grid Comput<strong>in</strong>g and Distributed Systems (GRIDS) Laboratory at the University of Melbourne<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g the Gridbus project. A detailed list of achievements is described <strong>in</strong> 150 , <strong>in</strong> summary all the<br />

elements required as described above are at some release status, and they have also developed a tool for<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g global grid operation<br />

148 We would like to propose here the use of a new parameter class of customer, so that resource providers can price their facility accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the user and application. This would give the possibility that charities and academic organisations may have access to grid resources<br />

for free or a low cost, while commercial organisation may need to reward the resource providers for help<strong>in</strong>g their bus<strong>in</strong>ess. The<br />

parameter could be further differentiated accord<strong>in</strong>g to application to allow resource providers some ethical <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong>to what their facilities<br />

are used for. This parameter is analogous to the class of service parameter that the customer enjoys.<br />

149 http://www.gridbus.org/papers/gridbus2004.pdf<br />

150 http://www.gridbus.org/papers/gridbus2004.pdf


Page 118 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• Globus Alliance, a community of organisations and <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have released a toolkit for build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

grid systems and applications 151 . The collaborators are primarily at European and American<br />

organisations. The team state, “The Globus toolkit <strong>in</strong>cludes software for security, <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure, resource management, data management, communication, fault detection, and<br />

portability. The packaged suite of components can be used either <strong>in</strong>dependently or together to develop<br />

applications.” The claim that there are over 22,000 downloads per month from their web-site<br />

• Coregrid, is a network of excellence funded by the EC under the 6 th Framework program 152 It started <strong>in</strong><br />

Sept 2004 and is due to last 4 years. The program of activities is based around 6 complementary<br />

research areas:<br />

- knowledge & data management;<br />

- programm<strong>in</strong>g models;<br />

- system architecture;<br />

- Grid <strong>in</strong>formation and monitor<strong>in</strong>g services;<br />

- resource management and schedul<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

- problem solv<strong>in</strong>g environments, tools and GRID systems.<br />

Similarly there are several groups try<strong>in</strong>g to organise large grid networks. These <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

• The Global Data-Intensive Grid Collaboration 153 organised by the GRIDs laboratory. This is <strong>in</strong>tended<br />

to demonstrate achievement of the two orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g HPC challenges “Most Data-Intensive and<br />

Geographically Distributed Applications”.<br />

• Teragrid154 launched by the National Science Foundation <strong>in</strong> the US with multiple supercomput<strong>in</strong>g sites<br />

connected 155 . The components are l<strong>in</strong>ked by a 40Gbit/s network and can provide 20 Teraflops of<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g power and over 1 Petabyte of storage. Stated applications for the Teragrid <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />

- the study of drug <strong>in</strong>teractions with cancer cells, to thereby develop better cancer drugs<br />

- the study the human genome and how the bra<strong>in</strong> works,<br />

- the analysis of weather data so quickly that they will be able to create real-time weather forecasts that<br />

can predict down to the kilometer where a tornado or other severe storm is likely to hit.<br />

- the design of better aircraft by allow<strong>in</strong>g realistic simulations of new designs<br />

- the understand<strong>in</strong>g the properties of our universe and how it formed.<br />

• The Large Hadron Collider Comput<strong>in</strong>g grid (LCG) 156 . This is be<strong>in</strong>g built to deal with the anticipated<br />

comput<strong>in</strong>g needs of the Large Hadron Collider under construction at CERN. It <strong>in</strong>cludes more than 100<br />

sites <strong>in</strong> 31 countries which contribute >10,000 CPUs and nearly 10,000,000 Gbytes of storage. The<br />

group claim this is the largest <strong>in</strong>ternational scientific grid and they are achiev<strong>in</strong>g record break<strong>in</strong>g results<br />

for high speed data transfer. However the current process<strong>in</strong>g capacity of this Grid is estimated to be just<br />

5% of the long-term needs of the Large Hadron Collider. Therefore, the LCG will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow<br />

rapidly.<br />

Of these grids the first is the closest approximation of a flexible grid as described <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction. The other<br />

two examples are primarily under adm<strong>in</strong>istrative control of one body for def<strong>in</strong>ed applications.<br />

7.4.4.7 Issues and Trends<br />

Currently there appear to be two trends of development with<strong>in</strong> the community:<br />

• The first is concerned with solv<strong>in</strong>g big scientific problems such as the date provided by the LHC.<br />

Teams work<strong>in</strong>g on this generally are build<strong>in</strong>g large grid networks (either with clusters of resources<br />

provided by well def<strong>in</strong>ed collaborators, or with those provided from a more loose collection of<br />

donators). The grids are based around s<strong>in</strong>gle (or a small group of) applications and may not necessarily<br />

be easily transferable to other projects with the software possibly be<strong>in</strong>g bespoke. The aim here is to<br />

provide a big resource to a limited number of users<br />

• The second is more egalitarian with the thrust be<strong>in</strong>g to generate a devolved resource available to<br />

everyone. They propose a market system for allocation of resources and posit <strong>in</strong>telligent middleware<br />

151 http://www.globus.org/<br />

152 http://www.coregrid.net/mambo/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/<br />

153 http://gridbus.cs.mu.oz.au/sc2003/<br />

154 Strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g the def<strong>in</strong>ed nature of the resources and their ownership by a collaborat<strong>in</strong>g group means that Teragrid should be<br />

considered a cluster network, rather than a grid network us<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itions available <strong>in</strong> the literature.<br />

155 http://www.teragrid.org/about/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

156 http://lcg.web.cern.ch/LCG/


Page 119 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g the penetration of the grid to be massive and available to those who are not computer science<br />

experts<br />

Both approaches are valid and the development of the grid will probably proceed along both paths <strong>in</strong> parallel.<br />

7.4.4.8 Gap Analysis<br />

The tools necessary for the “large science” applications are already present. The ma<strong>in</strong> thrust here then will be to<br />

grow the size of the grids and their process<strong>in</strong>g and storage powers. As the amount of data thrown out by<br />

experiments cont<strong>in</strong>ues to exponentially grow, the thirst for resources will still cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow. The expectation<br />

here is that major <strong>in</strong>vestments will be required for storage and process<strong>in</strong>g power, if the grids are cluster<br />

networks under the control of one adm<strong>in</strong>istration, or the users will have to encourage more and more to donate<br />

resources if the networks are true grids. In either case the data transfer over networks will <strong>in</strong>crease and high<br />

speed connections will be needed, particularly at the users’ ends as they will form the hubs of the networks.<br />

The software tools for the pervasive democratic grid will need to cont<strong>in</strong>ue development. While the requirements<br />

of the software suite are well understood, much work needs to be done to generate the code, verify it and<br />

guarantee it suitable for deployment. Further for large penetration both the users and the providers<br />

understandably will require conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g of its security and lack of impact on their requirements. Some work will<br />

need to be done to encourage providers to sign up and perhaps the market ideas are the best way of do<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

with the providers be<strong>in</strong>g rewarded for their participation. Perhaps the most challeng<strong>in</strong>g aspect of the software is<br />

the part which will allow non-specialist users to generate their applications for use on the grid.<br />

7.4.4.9 Roadmap<br />

Near Term<br />

Grid resources will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be available to large scale scientific applications, but the size of the networks<br />

(number of nodes, storage and comput<strong>in</strong>g power) will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grow. Broadband penetration will also aid<br />

this. The user group will enlarge from predom<strong>in</strong>ately pure scientists with academic research organisations to<br />

applied scientists some from commercial organisations. The applications will still need specialists to couch them<br />

<strong>in</strong> distributable terms. Grid “clusters” will still be adm<strong>in</strong>istrated by s<strong>in</strong>gle organisations or collaborations.<br />

Medium Term<br />

Development of the middleware will beg<strong>in</strong> to alter the nature of the grid. Resources will be available through<br />

brokers to a wider group of participants. Thus the grid management will become decentralised. Some expertise<br />

will still be needed to generate the applications, but this will process will be simplified so it is with<strong>in</strong> the grasp<br />

of smaller organisations. The grid will become more commercial <strong>in</strong> its nature with some form of reward/cost for<br />

its supply/usage.<br />

Long Term<br />

The grid will become a ubiquitous resource and become as much a part of everyday life as electricity supply and<br />

usage is now. Penetration will make the resources available to all users regardless of size and technical<br />

adeptness. Individuals will be able to use the grid to provide them with their needs and will supply the grid<br />

themselves with their spare process<strong>in</strong>g power. A market will reward them for their supply and charge them for<br />

their demand. The application software will allow users without detailed knowledge to use the resources <strong>in</strong> the<br />

same way that a user today can use a spreadsheet without detailed knowledge of the code that powers it. Perhaps<br />

applications will be available to the users from the grid only rather than from their mach<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> a similar way to<br />

current web .asp resources.


7.5 END-TO-END<br />

7.5.1 Security<br />

7.5.1.1 Introduction<br />

Page 120 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Broadband networks will offer people the possibility to be connected to the Internet at all times, new wireless<br />

applications will enable the users to access the Internet from just about anywhere and the possibilities to connect<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g from pr<strong>in</strong>ters to refrigerators to the Internet, will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to develop and expand the way people use<br />

the Internet. However, users often feel <strong>in</strong>secure when us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet due to fear of viruses, hack<strong>in</strong>g attacks<br />

etc.. In the near future requirements on security will rapidly change as network<strong>in</strong>g and comput<strong>in</strong>g develop<br />

further and comput<strong>in</strong>g become more ubiquitous.<br />

Manag<strong>in</strong>g security has turned out to be a difficult and complex task, as the user has to deal with the availability,<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity, authenticity, and confidentiality of data and services. Due to the complexity of technology, many<br />

components and actors must play together, and human behaviour has become a crucial factor.<br />

Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation security is critical to the operations, reputation, and economic stability of any<br />

organisation. As an organisation’s dependency on computers and network communications <strong>in</strong>creases, so does its<br />

vulnerability to <strong>in</strong>formation security compromises. Almost every week the media reports on new computer<br />

crimes, system break-<strong>in</strong>s, malicious code attacks, and the ever-grow<strong>in</strong>g threat of cyber terrorism. Current<br />

research on network security shows three realities that organisations must consider:<br />

• Threats to computer systems and networks are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Damage caused by malicious attacks is ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Systems without appropriate security are easy hits for hackers<br />

In addition to the legal ramifications of a security breach, it has substantiated that malicious attacks result <strong>in</strong><br />

actual f<strong>in</strong>ancial costs, decreases <strong>in</strong> revenue, and an <strong>in</strong>credible impact on productivity. The security architecture<br />

that can help organisations to reduce <strong>in</strong>cidents of security breach and to meet the requirements of new laws and<br />

regulations around the world is be<strong>in</strong>g addressed <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>dustrial and public organisations.<br />

7.5.1.2 State of the art/exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies<br />

7.5.1.2.1 Threats to Network and Information Security<br />

Risk Assessment<br />

When decid<strong>in</strong>g which technologies should be used to protect an <strong>in</strong>formation network and how they should be<br />

used, it is important to consider <strong>in</strong> detail what the realistic threats to the network are. Simply apply<strong>in</strong>g security<br />

technologies without consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> detail why there are be<strong>in</strong>g applied can lead to <strong>in</strong>appropriate security be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

applied. In the worst-case, <strong>in</strong>adequate security may be provided, leav<strong>in</strong>g the network potentially open to attack.<br />

However, apply<strong>in</strong>g security measures that are not needed may be almost as damag<strong>in</strong>g due to the <strong>in</strong>creased costs<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved and potential reduction <strong>in</strong> the efficiency and functionality of the network.<br />

When consider<strong>in</strong>g threats to the network <strong>in</strong> detail, it is also important to remember that 100% security is rarely,<br />

if ever, possible. Just because a threat is possible does not mean that it should be countered. Similarly, some<br />

threats may be considered important, but, <strong>in</strong> general, it will not be possible to elim<strong>in</strong>ate them entirely. What is<br />

required is to mitigate the risks to an acceptable level. This is the process of risk assessment.<br />

When perform<strong>in</strong>g a risk assessment, one typically needs to th<strong>in</strong>k about the assets that require protection, the<br />

potential threats to these assets, and potential countermeasures.<br />

Assets<br />

The first step <strong>in</strong> a risk assessment should always be to identify what assets are of value, and therefore could<br />

potentially be at risk. This <strong>in</strong>volves answer<strong>in</strong>g questions such as what are the assets?, what is the value of<br />

particular assets?, how will they be used?, what is their life cycle? and so on.<br />

Threats<br />

Once the assets that may require protection are understood, then potential threats to them need to be considered.<br />

Threats can be divided <strong>in</strong>to those that may affect the confidentiality, <strong>in</strong>tegrity or availability of assets.


Page 121 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

For each potential threat, an assessment has to take place of how significant it is. This will typically <strong>in</strong>volve an<br />

estimation of the likelihood and impact, if successful, of the threat. Some threats may be extremely significant if<br />

successful. However, if they are extremely unlikely to happen, then they may be considered an acceptable risk.<br />

On the other hand, some threats may be of only m<strong>in</strong>or significance if successful, however, if they are very likely<br />

to happen then the cumulative effect may be significant. Therefore, an assessment of the likelihood of a threat is<br />

important. This will <strong>in</strong>volve assess<strong>in</strong>g factors such as ease of implementation of threats and motivation of<br />

attackers. When assess<strong>in</strong>g the impact of threats if successful, an evaluation of the assets affected will be<br />

necessary.<br />

The output of this assessment of risks will be a set of significant threats to the network, where each one has a<br />

level of risk associated to it.<br />

Countermeasures<br />

Once the significant threats are known, countermeasures to mitigate the risks can be selected. Countermeasures<br />

can either be technological, e.g. apply IPsec, or procedural, e.g. security awareness tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. They are aimed at<br />

address<strong>in</strong>g the vulnerabilities that the threats make use of. Threats with higher risk levels will, <strong>in</strong> general, require<br />

stronger countermeasures to be put <strong>in</strong> place than those with lower risk levels. Once aga<strong>in</strong>, it is worth po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />

out that countermeasures are not generally chosen to try and elim<strong>in</strong>ate threats, but to reduce their risk to<br />

acceptable levels.<br />

7.5.1.2.2 Security Threats<br />

Threats on networks can be fortuitous due to users’ errors or material problems, but they also can be <strong>in</strong>tentional.<br />

Security threats to networks and <strong>in</strong>formation systems are categorized as:<br />

Confidentiality violation<br />

The confidentiality violation is when those who have not been authorized to access particular electronic data are<br />

able to. They <strong>in</strong>tercept and use private <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Data’ <strong>in</strong>tegrity violation<br />

The data <strong>in</strong>tegrity violation is when those who are not allowed to do so can modify the electronic data. This<br />

threat affects the quality, correctness, authenticity, timeless and accuracy of the data.<br />

System’ <strong>in</strong>tegrity violation<br />

This threat has an effect on the successful and correct operation of the resources. Secret violation and <strong>in</strong>trusion<br />

or hack<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g Trojan Horses or back doors imp<strong>in</strong>ge on the system’ <strong>in</strong>tegrity.<br />

Reduced availability<br />

The reduced availability is when the electronic data cannot be accessed when needed by those authorised to do<br />

so. Licensed used must be able to use these resources without be<strong>in</strong>g h<strong>in</strong>dered by un<strong>in</strong>tentional or malicious acts.<br />

There are several k<strong>in</strong>ds of reduced availability reasons, such as the denial of services caused by worms,<br />

spoof<strong>in</strong>g, or the pollution due to spam.<br />

7.5.1.2.3 Threat Matrix<br />

Threath \ Affected security objectives Confidentiality Data’ <strong>in</strong>tegrity System’ <strong>in</strong>tegrity Availability<br />

Eavesdropp<strong>in</strong>g Yes<br />

Denial of Service Yes<br />

Man <strong>in</strong> the Middle Yes Yes Yes<br />

Masquerad<strong>in</strong>g Yes<br />

Replay Yes Yes<br />

Spoof<strong>in</strong>g Yes<br />

Rootkits Yes<br />

Spam, retro-spam Yes<br />

Back door Yes Yes<br />

Hoax Yes<br />

Macro-virus Yes<br />

Spyware Yes<br />

Trojan Horse Yes<br />

Virus (simple) Yes<br />

Worms Yes<br />

Table 11: Threat Matrix


Page 122 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.5.1.2.4 Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Security Policies<br />

Once the risk assessment process has been completed and countermeasures selected, the results should be<br />

captured <strong>in</strong> a security policy document. This document will be provided to implementers, adm<strong>in</strong>istrators and<br />

users of the network, and describes what technological countermeasures are used and how they should be<br />

configured, actions that must be undertaken for particular scenarios.<br />

Privacy<br />

Besides the confidentiality of exchanged or stored <strong>in</strong>formation, privacy aspects become important if the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>s any k<strong>in</strong>d of personal <strong>in</strong>formation. In general, privacy is only given if the personal<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, which is transmitted over the network or stored <strong>in</strong> any database,<br />

• is held <strong>in</strong> trust,<br />

• is visible only to any parties with the previous consent of the person to whom the personal <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

belongs to, and<br />

• is not transferred to any third party without the previous consent of the person to whom the personal<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation belongs to.<br />

7.5.1.2.5 Trust Services<br />

Public Key Infrastructure<br />

The target of a PKI is to provide Public Key Certificate (PKC) management to the group of security protocols<br />

designed to protect the Internet. These protocols, as IPSec (Internet Protocol Security), SSL (Secure Sockets<br />

Layer), TLS (Transport Layer Security) or S/MIME (Secure Multipurpose Internal Mail Extensions) use public<br />

key cryptography to provide services such as confidentiality, data <strong>in</strong>tegrity, data orig<strong>in</strong> authentication and nonrepudiation.<br />

Users of public key based systems must trust <strong>in</strong> a PKC. It is a data structure which b<strong>in</strong>ds a public key to the user<br />

subject. This b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is achieved by hav<strong>in</strong>g a trusted CA that verifies the subject identity and digitally signs each<br />

digital certificate.<br />

A PKI is based on public key cryptography system, that may <strong>in</strong>clude software, people, policies, hardware, etc,<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g to create, manage, store, distribute and revoke public key certificates. The Private Key Infrastructure<br />

(PKI) is a robust technology that provides a complete security solution to open networks where many<br />

communication partners are <strong>in</strong>volved. It delivers strong authentication, data confidentiality and data <strong>in</strong>tegrity. It<br />

enables non-repudiation and facilitates centralized privilege management.<br />

The PKI deployment depends on the level of security that needs to be obta<strong>in</strong>ed for applications and the<br />

demographics of the community of application users. It is important for the users to understand the reasons<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d selection PKI technology, the procedure <strong>in</strong> obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g certificates and the advantages <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g PKI. A set<br />

of sound policies and procedures must be created and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> order to deploy a successful PKI. It is also<br />

critical to review current policies and decide if additional policies and practices have to be established and<br />

implemented.<br />

7.5.1.2.6 Secure Mobility Services<br />

Relevance of mobility protocols<br />

The support of mobility of different parts of the network becomes an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important requirement <strong>in</strong><br />

many scenarios. The solutions, which are currently <strong>in</strong>vestigated and developed <strong>in</strong> the Internet Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Task<br />

Force (IETF) for this purpose, can be structured <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g categories:<br />

• Host Mobility, that is a mobile host dynamically changes its po<strong>in</strong>t of attachment to a fixed backbone,<br />

• Network Mobility, that is a network <strong>in</strong> motion dynamically changes its po<strong>in</strong>t of attachment to a fixed<br />

backbone, and<br />

• Mobile Ad hoc Networks, that is the backbone topology itself consists of mobile router and<br />

consequently is dynamically chang<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Threats to mobility protocols<br />

As the <strong>in</strong>tention of mobility protocols is clearly to support a roam<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g efficient means for<br />

communication, most attacks are dest<strong>in</strong>ed to prevent this support and thereby successfully disrupt the<br />

communication of the roam<strong>in</strong>g system. This means even if the specific attacks make use of techniques like<br />

spoof<strong>in</strong>g or masquerad<strong>in</strong>g, the f<strong>in</strong>al consequence of most attacks is a Denial of Service.


7.5.1.3 Issues and trends<br />

Page 123 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

ICT (<strong>in</strong>formation and communication technologies) are gett<strong>in</strong>g pervasive <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g Information Society<br />

across heterogeneous, complex, open, <strong>in</strong>terdependent and <strong>in</strong>telligent <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>frastructures.<br />

An open Information Society creates new opportunities for value creation and knowledge shar<strong>in</strong>g, thereby<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g to possible conflicts with the traditional pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of privacy. It also opens up new vulnerabilities for its<br />

users <strong>in</strong> terms of malfunction, contentious activities and privacy <strong>in</strong>vasion. Heterogeneous technologies (fixed,<br />

mobile, DVB, wireless, satellite etc..) and m-commerce <strong>in</strong> particular will have far reach<strong>in</strong>g implications for trust<br />

and dependable security. Security without dependable <strong>in</strong>frastructure and services will have no value. Hence<br />

security and dependability have to be considered together.<br />

These technologies <strong>in</strong>volve the mobility of users of <strong>in</strong>formation and communications services (e.g. laptops,<br />

mobile phones, PDA’s), the mobility of applications for personalised and location based services (e.g.<br />

downloadable code and content) and the mobility of the components <strong>in</strong> the communications networks.<br />

Emerg<strong>in</strong>g research issues<br />

The security of the personal <strong>in</strong>fo-sphere, which covers the notion of secur<strong>in</strong>g personal <strong>in</strong>fo-assets and<br />

credentials and relates to the deployment of personal area networks composed of personal devices. These<br />

devices can all be <strong>in</strong>terconnected on a peer to peer basis.<br />

The security of the virtual community, which covers aspects related to establish<strong>in</strong>g and manag<strong>in</strong>g trust relations<br />

<strong>in</strong> communities, concern<strong>in</strong>g social as well as bus<strong>in</strong>ess relations. With<strong>in</strong> this context there is a need for flexible<br />

and configurable security policies that also cover different levels of authentication and authorisation of the<br />

actors <strong>in</strong> transactions whilst safeguard<strong>in</strong>g anonymity requirements for certa<strong>in</strong> categories of actors. Trusted<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructures are needed to implement these policies. This challenge is gett<strong>in</strong>g even harder because of the<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>telligence, functionality and responsiveness be<strong>in</strong>g placed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>frastructure, which itself is<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly becom<strong>in</strong>g dynamic.<br />

The Security of the Infrastructure, which covers the notion of secur<strong>in</strong>g the essential IT <strong>in</strong>frastructure that<br />

underp<strong>in</strong>s the economy and society of the European Union. Technological developments and the needs of law<br />

enforcement provide <strong>in</strong>creased opportunities for surveillance <strong>in</strong> Internet. Better manag<strong>in</strong>g and strengthen<strong>in</strong>g our<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure would make it more efficient and resilient without the need for unnecessary surveillance. A<br />

societal debate that strikes an acceptable balance between surveillance and the rights of the <strong>in</strong>dividual should<br />

underp<strong>in</strong> that issue.<br />

To support user confidence and security, trustworthy (“trusted”) components should become more easily<br />

available to users. Users should be given the possibility to choose (as appropriate) components which they trust<br />

and which they would use to store personal <strong>in</strong>formation and credentials so as to build trust relations with other<br />

entities and objects. However, the overall security model is chang<strong>in</strong>g rapidly and profoundly, and this means<br />

that the notion of “trusted component” is chang<strong>in</strong>g as well: from monolithic systems the drive is towards<br />

distributed systems and networked components.<br />

Another aspect of confidence and trust is l<strong>in</strong>ked to the capability to evaluate and assess the security<br />

levels/features of components, systems, services, etc. S<strong>in</strong>ce the security of a system depends on the <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and <strong>in</strong>teroperability of different systems and processes, schemes for evaluation and assessment should support<br />

the same dynamics (<strong>in</strong> time and space) and lifecycle as the technologies they are assess<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

7.5.1.4 Socio-economic impact<br />

In the Internet of today the pendulum sw<strong>in</strong>gs mostly towards the ‘technical haves’ and the people <strong>in</strong> possession<br />

of certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation. Whereas the ‘technical have-nots’ come under immense pressure from the legislation<br />

from above and have no means to evade this stranglehold. Users often feel <strong>in</strong>secure when us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet due<br />

to fear of viruses, hack<strong>in</strong>g attacks, eavesdropp<strong>in</strong>g, identity theft and other nefarious activities. In the near future<br />

requirements on security <strong>in</strong>frastructures will rapidly change as network<strong>in</strong>g and comput<strong>in</strong>g develop further and<br />

comput<strong>in</strong>g becomes more ubiquitous. This means that broadband connections will offer people the possibility to<br />

be connected to the Internet at all times, new wireless applications will enable the users to access the Internet<br />

from just about anywhere and the possibilities to connect everyth<strong>in</strong>g from pr<strong>in</strong>ters to refrigerators to the Internet,<br />

will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to develop and expand the way <strong>in</strong> which people use the Internet.<br />

Governmental e-applications have to be affordable to any citizen and more than others must be respectful of<br />

privacy. Nevertheless, many of these applications serve millions of users, and handle tremendous amount of<br />

data. These applications are, by def<strong>in</strong>ition, highly reliable when used by the public and must be extremely<br />

resilient when support<strong>in</strong>g the critical missions of the government or vital utilities.


Page 124 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation security is critical to the operations, reputation, and economic stability of any<br />

organisation. As an organisation’s dependency on computers and network communications <strong>in</strong>creases, so does its<br />

vulnerability to <strong>in</strong>formation security compromises. There are cont<strong>in</strong>uous media reports on new computer crimes,<br />

system break-<strong>in</strong>s, malicious code attacks, and the ever-grow<strong>in</strong>g threat of cyber terrorism. Current network<br />

security shows three realities that organisations must consider:<br />

• Threats to computer systems and networks are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Damage caused by malicious attacks is ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Systems without appropriate security are easy targets for people <strong>in</strong>tent on do<strong>in</strong>g damage<br />

Malicious attacks result <strong>in</strong> actual f<strong>in</strong>ancial costs, decreases <strong>in</strong> revenue, and an <strong>in</strong>credible impact on productivity.<br />

The security architecture that can help organisations to reduce <strong>in</strong>cidents of security breach and to meet the<br />

requirements of new laws and regulations around the world is be<strong>in</strong>g addressed <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>dustrial and public<br />

organisations. Security is becom<strong>in</strong>g far more complex everyday and requires new th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g on security models,<br />

policies and guidel<strong>in</strong>es to <strong>in</strong>formation systems designers consider<strong>in</strong>g the security requirements of their networks<br />

and applications.<br />

Data stored on computers that has even a remote possibility of conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation such as social security<br />

numbers, credit card and f<strong>in</strong>ancial account numbers, account balances, and <strong>in</strong>vestment portfolio <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

must be protected.<br />

7.5.1.5 Roadmap<br />

The roadmap development for security and trust is a difficult one, s<strong>in</strong>ce the security requirement is so pervasive,<br />

there is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous paradigm shifts <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the security and trust requirements. The <strong>FP6</strong> framework has<br />

several projects address<strong>in</strong>g these issues, and the reader should go <strong>in</strong>to these project results to understand the<br />

roadmap issues of security.<br />

7.5.1.5.1 New types of networks<br />

The technical and bus<strong>in</strong>ess trend <strong>in</strong> communication networks is to converge, <strong>in</strong>tegrate more “<strong>in</strong>telligence”,<br />

“autonomy” and “functionality” <strong>in</strong>to networks that become more and more responsive/active. These new<br />

networks can differ <strong>in</strong> physical extension and scale (local, personal, domestic, etc.), timel<strong>in</strong>ess, configurability<br />

etc. In particular, connectivity and communications are more and more be<strong>in</strong>g realised by <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of diverse and heterogeneous networks, services and/or components of networks which give<br />

birth to new categories of networks, namely:<br />

• • Spontaneous/ Self-Organis<strong>in</strong>g Networks, which are at the service level (or service related) – such as<br />

enabl<strong>in</strong>g people <strong>in</strong> a room to establish communication. These embrace the “plug and play” concept and<br />

generalize the “JINI” model.<br />

• • Ad Hoc Networks normally formed by an ensemble of network nodes without fixed and predef<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructures (topology). These are rout<strong>in</strong>g related and, normally, embrace the notion of<br />

communicat<strong>in</strong>g objects, piconets, Bluetooth, etc.<br />

• • Ambient Networks - that are context aware <strong>in</strong> the sense of “personalisation”, localization (<strong>in</strong> space<br />

and time) and contextualisation. Bluetooth and other domestic (“domotic”, i.e. for use <strong>in</strong> an automated<br />

home environment) protocols would br<strong>in</strong>g computers everywhere as communicat<strong>in</strong>g objects. This will<br />

drive demand for security models deployable through space and time. In this respect, new patterns/<br />

behaviours of communications would emerge, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g multi-party communications and virtual<br />

associations of any k<strong>in</strong>ds (devices, components, entities, doma<strong>in</strong>s, hybrid, etc.) This <strong>in</strong> turn will require<br />

novel paradigms to manage and share secrets, such as new cryptography protocols to enable more<br />

parties to contribute to the same discussion (multilateral discussion) Lastly, it is envisaged that all these<br />

developments would tend to resolve the current complexity by clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g between the<br />

application layer and the transport layer.<br />

7.5.1.5.2 New challenges: Network security architecture def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

• Innovative network security models, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- new cryptographic paradigms and novel multi-party cryptographic protocols that can be easily<br />

adapted to different security policies and that can enhance the configuration of policies.<br />

- new approaches to def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g security policies not necessarily based on access control, which may not<br />

be a viable solution <strong>in</strong> a mobile environment.


Page 125 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• New protocols (<strong>in</strong> particular for multicast<strong>in</strong>g) for identification and authentication of nodes, services,<br />

routes, active code, etc. as well as for distribution of credentials<br />

• Cop<strong>in</strong>g with new attack models such as distributed denial of service attacks<br />

• Multi-party security association management<br />

• Issues related to management of sources of trust and accountability <strong>in</strong> dynamic environments.<br />

• Survivability of <strong>in</strong>frastructures, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g assurance of unbounded and novel network types (e.g.<br />

“mobile” networks)<br />

• Common security framework for both wireless and wirel<strong>in</strong>e architectures<br />

- Provid<strong>in</strong>g uniform access to security functions from a user’s perspective.<br />

- Reth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g the access control function to subdoma<strong>in</strong>s, when deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>in</strong>creased heterogeneity and to the user (personal) sphere.<br />

• The importance of security standards was underl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> order to avoid proliferation of <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g<br />

procedures.<br />

7.5.1.5.3 Interoperability Issues<br />

The emergence of new networks and services would br<strong>in</strong>g about the problem of how to secure the<br />

<strong>in</strong>teroperability of all these networks and security doma<strong>in</strong>s of <strong>in</strong>dividual networks. The situation would also be<br />

made more complex by the fact that networks would themselves be the “access device/gateway” to wider<br />

“scope” networks, such as:<br />

• different types of Wide Area Networks/Corporate Networks (Mobile telecomm nets, mobile Internet,<br />

fixed networks)<br />

• different types of access networks (xDSLs, DVB-T/H, WLANs and mobile)<br />

The secure <strong>in</strong>teroperability issues would not only stem from the “structural” diversity of the networks but, even<br />

more importantly, from the evolutionary aspects related to the capability of dynamically re-configur<strong>in</strong>g networks<br />

and service components. On top of the huge difficulties <strong>in</strong> realis<strong>in</strong>g secure physical and logical <strong>in</strong>teroperability<br />

between networks, the challenge will be made even harder by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of network service providers<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the provision of network services (active nets, segmented value cha<strong>in</strong>, etc.).


7.5.2 Overall management and control<br />

7.5.2.1 Introduction<br />

Page 126 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Network functionality is usually split <strong>in</strong>to three parts called planes; each of them responsible for certa<strong>in</strong><br />

functions:<br />

• Management plane<br />

Longer-term functionality, such as static bandwidth provision<strong>in</strong>g, device configuration and monitor<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

fault management and restoration.<br />

• Control plane<br />

Short term functionality: Connection set-up and tear-down, protection, signall<strong>in</strong>g, etc.<br />

• User plane<br />

Could also be called data transport plane. Raw data transport, buffer<strong>in</strong>g, shap<strong>in</strong>g…<br />

The overall function is to provide a certa<strong>in</strong> degree of Quality of service (QoS) to the user.<br />

Management Plane<br />

Control Plane<br />

Discovery<br />

Signall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Rout<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Resource<br />

management<br />

Transport Plane<br />

Figure 40<br />

The management plane performs overall network functions such as bandwidth reservation/provision<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g and restoration. A separate network usually performs network management. I.e., the network<br />

carry<strong>in</strong>g management <strong>in</strong>formation is different from the one carry<strong>in</strong>g user data. In that way network monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

can be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed even <strong>in</strong> the case of failures.<br />

Network management <strong>in</strong>formation is carried by specialised protocols such as SNMP. Each network element or<br />

sub-element conta<strong>in</strong>s an element manager, which gathers <strong>in</strong>formation and communicates with a centralised<br />

network management systems located at the control centre of the network provider.<br />

Usually, network management is sub-divided <strong>in</strong>to a number of sub-functions, namely:


Page 127 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• Configuration management<br />

• Performance management<br />

• Fault management<br />

• Security management<br />

• Account<strong>in</strong>g management<br />

The control plane takes care of signall<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the network. The control plane provides such<br />

functionalities as rout<strong>in</strong>g and resource reservation. With the <strong>in</strong>troduction of a control plane conventional optical<br />

networks can become much more dynamic and responsive, and thus dynamically chang<strong>in</strong>g customer bandwidth<br />

demands can be met and a better utilisation of the network resources can be achieved. It also supports quick<br />

protection and restoration.<br />

The user plane is responsible for transport of user data. A vast amount of protocols have been def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

<strong>in</strong>sure proper communication, - def<strong>in</strong>e data formats, handle flow and congestion control, def<strong>in</strong>e number<strong>in</strong>g plans<br />

(address<strong>in</strong>g schemes) etc.<br />

7.5.2.2 End to end control / QOS support<br />

With<strong>in</strong> the IP community two different approaches for provid<strong>in</strong>g QoS <strong>in</strong> IP based networks have emerged:<br />

Intserv or <strong>in</strong>tegrated services and Diffserv or differentiated services (Table 12).<br />

Intserv<br />

Diffserv<br />

Characteristics<br />

Per flow traffic management. Relies on explicit resource reservation <strong>in</strong> the network nodes. RSVP is used as<br />

signall<strong>in</strong>g protocol to set up paths and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a soft state for each connection, mean<strong>in</strong>g that reservations must be<br />

refreshed <strong>in</strong> order to keep the connection established. All network nodes must support Intserv <strong>in</strong> order to be able to<br />

give any guarantees.<br />

Per packet traffic management. A number of traffic classes are created by prioritisation <strong>in</strong> all network nodes and<br />

classification at network / doma<strong>in</strong> boundaries at the so-called diffserv code-po<strong>in</strong>ts. The most fundamental diffserv<br />

QoS concept is the PHB. Each additional diffserv capable device added to the network enhances the separation of the<br />

traffic classes.<br />

Table 12<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> difference between <strong>in</strong>tserv and diffserv is the way resources are treated with<strong>in</strong> the network. The per<br />

packet traffic management paradigm used by Diffserv relies on each network element’s correct treatment of the<br />

packet. The difficult th<strong>in</strong>g here is the mapp<strong>in</strong>g from packet process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> each node (so called per hop behaviour<br />

or PHB) to end-to-end connection characteristics.<br />

Intserv connections are conceptually easier to handle because explicit resource reservation is employed.<br />

However, Intserv has a scal<strong>in</strong>g problem. The soft state reservation created by RSVP is accomplished by two<br />

types of messages: RESV and PATH. PATH messages flow from the connections <strong>in</strong>itiator and are routed<br />

through the network to the receiv<strong>in</strong>g client. The receiv<strong>in</strong>g client then computes a bandwidth requirement<br />

specification and issues a RESV message. This RESV massage backtracks the route followed by the PATH<br />

message forc<strong>in</strong>g resources to be allocated <strong>in</strong> the traversed routers. This cumbersome reservation mechanism<br />

supports multicast<strong>in</strong>g. The PATH massage is just duplicated <strong>in</strong> branch<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts and, <strong>in</strong> the reverse direction,<br />

RESV messages are merges <strong>in</strong> the branch<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

Nowadays MPLS (Multi Protocol Label Switch<strong>in</strong>g) is considered a better alternative than Intserv, so today the<br />

real battle is between MPLS and Diffserv.<br />

MPLS (Multi protocol label switch<strong>in</strong>g) is a network<strong>in</strong>g concept that is based ma<strong>in</strong>ly on a shift of all complex<br />

functionality to the edge of the network, leav<strong>in</strong>g only simple tasks for the core network and hence enabl<strong>in</strong>g fast<br />

and efficient operation. The control plane (that takes care of e.g., rout<strong>in</strong>g) and switch<strong>in</strong>g (packet forward<strong>in</strong>g) are<br />

completely decoupled, which yields the advantageous property that they can be chosen <strong>in</strong>dependently. MPLS is<br />

designed as a pure 'everyth<strong>in</strong>g over everyth<strong>in</strong>g' concept, hence its name. In reality, however, its predom<strong>in</strong>ant use<br />

and the majority of standardization work is focused on carry<strong>in</strong>g IP traffic with MPLS, which is due to the<br />

ubiquitous Internet.<br />

Packets <strong>in</strong> MPLS are forwarded along Label Switched Paths (LSPs) that are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by rout<strong>in</strong>g protocols<br />

based on predef<strong>in</strong>ed traffic classes called Forward Equivalent Classes (FECs). An FEC can be equivalent to a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle entry <strong>in</strong> a conventional IP rout<strong>in</strong>g table or it can be an aggregation hereof. An FEC can also be specified


Page 128 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

based on a number of additional constra<strong>in</strong>ts such as orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g address, receiv<strong>in</strong>g port number and QoS<br />

parameters. These LSPs are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the switches by us<strong>in</strong>g labels, which are distributed by a Label<br />

Distribution Protocol (LDP) responsible for mapp<strong>in</strong>g between rout<strong>in</strong>g and switch<strong>in</strong>g. Today, the protocol used<br />

for label distribution is predom<strong>in</strong>antly RSVP, which also exists <strong>in</strong> a Traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g capable version, which<br />

is called RSVP-TE.<br />

One of the major benefits of the MPLS concept is its ability to perform traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, i.e., to be able to<br />

control how traffic flows through the network, which is one of the prerequisites for provid<strong>in</strong>g QoS guarantees<br />

on connections. Generally, traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g implies to route along non-shortest paths and utilises Constra<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Based Rout<strong>in</strong>g (CBR) where the routes are calculated subject to performance- and adm<strong>in</strong>istrative constra<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />

which are assigned by the network management system based on traffic measurements. The well-known rout<strong>in</strong>g<br />

protocol OSPF, which is based on shortest path first (SPF) computations can rather easily be extended to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>in</strong> which case it is called CSPF (Constra<strong>in</strong>ed Shortest Path First). The CSPF algorithm is “greedy” <strong>in</strong><br />

the sense that a l<strong>in</strong>k is added to a path only if it satisfies the constra<strong>in</strong>ts, but the route calculations are not<br />

globally optimised.<br />

The solution could be to <strong>in</strong>troduce long-term traffic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g based on e.g., L<strong>in</strong>ear Programm<strong>in</strong>g (LP)<br />

techniques that will produce more optimised route assignments compared to constra<strong>in</strong>t based rout<strong>in</strong>g. LP is very<br />

time consum<strong>in</strong>g, however, so a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of LP and CSPF is preferable, i.e., while CSPF calculates the routes<br />

<strong>in</strong> the network, an LP solver runs <strong>in</strong> the background and optimises the CSPF computed routes. Another<br />

approach to reduc<strong>in</strong>g the LP computation time is by employ<strong>in</strong>g heuristics that, albeit giv<strong>in</strong>g only sub-optimal<br />

solutions, are usually close to the optimal ones with significantly reduced computation times.<br />

7.5.2.3 Protection and restoration<br />

The survivability of networks is achieved by provid<strong>in</strong>g backup paths. Two mechanisms are used to supply these<br />

backup paths: In protection, the paths are pre-computed and established prior to a failure, <strong>in</strong> contrast to dynamic<br />

restoration, where the backup paths are computed and established by us<strong>in</strong>g rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g resources <strong>in</strong> the network<br />

only after a failure has occurred.<br />

The evaluation criteria for protection and restoration methods are:<br />

• Reliability<br />

• Robustness<br />

• Resource usage<br />

• Recovery time<br />

Traditionally, networks have been controlled <strong>in</strong> a centralized structure, but a more dynamic traffic pattern is<br />

creat<strong>in</strong>g the need for distributed and highly flexible control mechanisms, where the network can be selforganiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

by sett<strong>in</strong>g up and tear<strong>in</strong>g down connections as they are required. In order to restore a network failure<br />

<strong>in</strong> a distributed control plane, the failure first needs to be discovered and a backup path with sufficient resources<br />

has to be allocated before the traffic can be switched to the identified backup path.<br />

In the field of survivable networks, researchers and <strong>in</strong>dustry are currently focus<strong>in</strong>g on the follow<strong>in</strong>g areas:<br />

• Fault detection schemes<br />

• Algorithms for survivable rout<strong>in</strong>g and resource allocation<br />

• Analysis and optimal design of network topologies<br />

• Integration of quality demands <strong>in</strong> survivable networks<br />

• Analysis of reliability and availability<br />

• IP-centric control and GMPLS mechanisms<br />

7.5.2.4 Trends and issues<br />

Today the communication <strong>in</strong>frastructure is divided <strong>in</strong>to a number of different networks usually focused around<br />

specific access technologies with dedicated adm<strong>in</strong>istration of applications and users. Despite that <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to some extent is enabled between users connected via different access technologies the consequence has been a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously grow<strong>in</strong>g complexity of the control architecture -with impact on cost and reliability. Users that want<br />

to exploit different k<strong>in</strong>d of access networks (fixed and wireless) need a set of subscriptions with different set of<br />

options and permissions. New services or new applications of exist<strong>in</strong>g services need to be developed and<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrated <strong>in</strong>dependently with<strong>in</strong> the different network. In order to simplify the future networks a migration


Page 129 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

strategy must be def<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>in</strong>tegrates not only the data plane but even more important the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />

system (control and management). It is hard to come up with one def<strong>in</strong>itive answer for what future will br<strong>in</strong>g. A<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle technology architecture and network has the advantage of easier ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. However, a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

technology probably cannot provide the optimal solution <strong>in</strong> all circumstances. In any case, it is a given fact that<br />

most of today's telecommunications networks are multi technology networks. There are three ma<strong>in</strong> reasons for<br />

that:<br />

• These networks are themselves <strong>in</strong>terconnected networks of different operators’ networks. Each<br />

operator has full control over its own doma<strong>in</strong> (and adopt a s<strong>in</strong>gle technology, if it can), but has no<br />

control over what technology its neighbour is us<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Many of these networks are very large. Each technology has its advantages. Therefore different<br />

technologies can be optimal <strong>in</strong> different circumstances/environments, and thus an operator can decide<br />

to use the optimal technology solutions <strong>in</strong> the different areas.<br />

• The upgrade of large networks is done gradually, dur<strong>in</strong>g which phase multiple technologies are present<br />

<strong>in</strong> the network.<br />

A consequence of migrat<strong>in</strong>g from one, exist<strong>in</strong>g network architecture to another one is that new equipment must<br />

be <strong>in</strong>troduced. The sheer size of networks often dictated a step-by step migration strategy, which implies that at<br />

all times the network will consist of a mixture of equipment, rang<strong>in</strong>g from e.g., electrical routers to all-optical<br />

packet and wavelength switches. It is important to f<strong>in</strong>d a suitable architecture <strong>in</strong> which new technology (e.g.,<br />

optical switches) can be <strong>in</strong>troduced gradually and hence enable a seamless migration. It should also be<br />

emphasized that this mixed network (Figure 41), which for <strong>in</strong>stance could be organized <strong>in</strong> a hierarchical fashion,<br />

is <strong>in</strong> fact advantageous for many networks because it makes the operator leverage a number of different legacy<br />

technologies while seamlessly migrat<strong>in</strong>g to the newest technologies.<br />

Figure 41: A mixed-technology network. New technologies are popp<strong>in</strong>g up as “islands” with<strong>in</strong> the network.<br />

There are a number of issues related to control <strong>in</strong> networks, namely:<br />

• Where to place the functionality (polic<strong>in</strong>g/shap<strong>in</strong>g/admission control units etc.), and how. One<br />

approach could be to move some control to the access network to relieve some signall<strong>in</strong>g burden from<br />

the core network. This is an issue also when consider<strong>in</strong>g network protection / restoration.<br />

• How to provide end-to-end control and hereby QoS support<br />

• How to evolve the current networks reus<strong>in</strong>g as much as possible from the legacy networks.<br />

• How to enable dynamic (on demand) <strong>in</strong>troduction of new services<br />

• Dynamic restoration.


7.5.2.5 Data transport<br />

Page 130 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

7.5.2.5.1 Emerg<strong>in</strong>g transport protocols<br />

UDP and RTP have become the protocols of choice for the transport of multimedia cont<strong>in</strong>uous streams on the<br />

Internet. They are widely used <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g products for multimedia transport (see Apple’s quicktime stream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

server, Microsoft w<strong>in</strong>dows media server, Real networks helix universal server, etc.) Multimedia stream<strong>in</strong>g over<br />

RTP/UDP has been also widely <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> past <strong>IST</strong> FP5 projects and is be<strong>in</strong>g reta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>itiatives such as<br />

ISMA (Internet Stream<strong>in</strong>g Media Alliance).<br />

The real-time transport protocol (RTP) provides end-to-end delivery services for data with real-time<br />

characteristics, such as <strong>in</strong>teractive audio and video. Those services <strong>in</strong>clude payload type identification, sequence<br />

number<strong>in</strong>g, time-stamp<strong>in</strong>g and delivery monitor<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

However, RTP itself does not provide any mechanism to ensure timely delivery or provide other quality-ofservice<br />

guarantees, but relies on lower-layer services to do so. It does not guarantee delivery or prevent out-oforder<br />

delivery, nor does it assume that the underly<strong>in</strong>g network is reliable and delivers packets <strong>in</strong> sequence..<br />

While RTP is primarily designed to satisfy the needs of multi- participant multimedia conferences, it is not<br />

limited to that particular application. Storage of cont<strong>in</strong>uous data, <strong>in</strong>teractive distributed simulation, active badge,<br />

and control and measurement applications may also f<strong>in</strong>d RTP applicable. RTP consists of two closely-l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

parts:<br />

• the real-time transport protocol (RTP), to carry data with delay-constra<strong>in</strong>ts;.<br />

• the RTP control protocol (RTCP), to monitor the quality of service and to convey <strong>in</strong>formation about the<br />

participants <strong>in</strong> an on-go<strong>in</strong>g session.<br />

7.5.2.5.2 DCCP<br />

This DCCP (Datagram Congestion Control Protocol) protocol is <strong>in</strong>tended to be used by applications such as<br />

stream<strong>in</strong>g multimedia. It can be regarded as a mix of UDP and TCP and offers a choice of congestion control<br />

mechanisms without mak<strong>in</strong>g use of some of the TCP features, which are not compatible with delay constra<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

DCCP is <strong>in</strong>tended for applications, which have preference for delivery of timely data over <strong>in</strong>-order delivery or<br />

reliability. Many of the applications targeted by DCCP (e.g., stream<strong>in</strong>g multimedia) currently use RTP over<br />

UDP. DCCP is <strong>in</strong>tended to be a standard way to implement congestion control and congestion control<br />

negotiation.<br />

DCCP provides many features to users, and has been criticized for the result<strong>in</strong>g complexity. A simplified<br />

version of DCCP, called DCCP-Lite is also under specification.<br />

7.5.2.5.3 UDP-lite<br />

The above problems need to be addressed <strong>in</strong> both wired and wireless media delivery <strong>in</strong>frastructure. However, <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructures with mobile and wireless access, QoS support requires <strong>in</strong> addition the delivery technologies to<br />

allow for high spectrum efficiency as well as robustness aga<strong>in</strong>st errors.<br />

This has led to the creation of the ROHC work<strong>in</strong>g group with<strong>in</strong> the IETF and to <strong>in</strong>itiatives such as UDP-Lite<br />

which should allow a more efficient bandwidth usage. The implementation of end-to-end congestion control <strong>in</strong><br />

network <strong>in</strong>frastructures with wireless access requires a capability of differentiat<strong>in</strong>g losses due to network<br />

congestion from losses result<strong>in</strong>g from UDP or UDP-lite paket discard after error detection. This is known as a<br />

loss differentiation problem.<br />

UDP-lite is a lightweight version of UDP, which provides <strong>in</strong>creased flexibility <strong>in</strong> the form of a partial and<br />

adaptable checksum. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the data <strong>in</strong> a packet can be divided <strong>in</strong>to two parts, a sensitive and an<br />

<strong>in</strong>sensitive part. Bit errors <strong>in</strong> the sensitive part of a packet will cause packets to be discarded at the receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

side, while errors <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>sensitive part will be ignored. While provid<strong>in</strong>g this extra flexibility, the UDP-lite<br />

protocol is compatible with the classic UDP protocol.<br />

7.5.2.6 Application layer mechanisms<br />

Another trend consists <strong>in</strong> try<strong>in</strong>g to adapt the applications to the network characteristics. A number of<br />

experiments have already shed light on the benefits of adaptation mechanisms. By handl<strong>in</strong>g delay jitter (delay<br />

adaptation), packet loss (forward error correction, error concealment), and variable source rate availability, they<br />

allow to improve the quality of multimedia communications over best-effort networks. Congestion control, rate<br />

control, forward error correction, schedul<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the application layer are considered as alternative or


Page 131 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

complementary solutions to the problem of optimum stream adaptation to network vary<strong>in</strong>g bandwidth, loss rate<br />

or delay characteristics.<br />

Congestion control can take different forms: one f<strong>in</strong>ds solutions rely<strong>in</strong>g on bandwidth prediction mechanisms,<br />

such as the TFRC algorithm now <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> DCCP. The bandwidth prediction is coupled with rate control<br />

performed either by a real-time encoder or by the stream<strong>in</strong>g server.<br />

In stream<strong>in</strong>g servers, so far, simple strategies such as multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g are generally considered (see e.g., the<br />

w<strong>in</strong>dows media server). The multimedia content is pre-encoded at a selection of bit rates. The different streams<br />

are stored on the stream<strong>in</strong>g server. In stream<strong>in</strong>g solutions support<strong>in</strong>g multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g, the stream<strong>in</strong>g server<br />

automatically detects the user’s Internet connection speed, e.g., us<strong>in</strong>g bandwidth prediction techniques described<br />

<strong>in</strong> the above section, and suitably adapts on the fly the bit rate, hence the quality of the media stream, by<br />

select<strong>in</strong>g the appropriate encoded stream. Multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g is implemented e.g., <strong>in</strong> the Microsoft w<strong>in</strong>dows<br />

media server and <strong>in</strong> the SureStream technology of the RealNetwork Helix media server. One should also note<br />

that alternative solutions to multi-rate switch<strong>in</strong>g considered <strong>in</strong> standardisation groups (e.g. MPEG) rely on<br />

scalable representations of the multimedia signals.<br />

The deployment of relay or cach<strong>in</strong>g media servers at the network edges is also among the features considered<br />

for avoid<strong>in</strong>g overload of the core network. Stream<strong>in</strong>g servers are thus positioned at the edge of the distribution<br />

network near the end-users. These proxy or cach<strong>in</strong>g servers can then fetch the requested media and serve it as if<br />

the content was locally available. This contributes to remov<strong>in</strong>g the load from the central server. The architecture<br />

of relay servers then implements what it is commonly referred to as Application Layer Multicast, lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

overlay content delivery architectures.<br />

7.5.2.7 Client side buffer management<br />

Mechanisms such as buffer management on the receiver, by allow<strong>in</strong>g for local cach<strong>in</strong>g and playback, are also<br />

envisaged to reduce the impact of network congestion on the quality of the rendered signals. Client side<br />

buffer<strong>in</strong>g coupled with <strong>in</strong>telligent pre-fetch<strong>in</strong>g and playback provides means to “absorb” network bandwidth<br />

vary<strong>in</strong>g conditions. Media data is buffered at the client to protect aga<strong>in</strong>st playout <strong>in</strong>terruptions due to packet<br />

losses and random delays. However, while the likelihood of an <strong>in</strong>terruption decreases as more data are buffered,<br />

the latency <strong>in</strong>creases. In today’s stream<strong>in</strong>g technologies, buffer<strong>in</strong>g delays often range from 5 to 15 seconds for a<br />

good balance between delay and playout reliability.<br />

Solutions for rate-distortion optimized stream<strong>in</strong>g of media packets have been studied. The stream<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

decides which packet to transmit based on the packet deadl<strong>in</strong>e, the channel statistics, the feedback <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

the packets <strong>in</strong>ter-dependencies and the reduced distortion result<strong>in</strong>g from a correct reception and decod<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

packet.<br />

7.5.2.8 Migration steps<br />

Up to date, telecommunication networks have been built for specific purposes. For <strong>in</strong>stance, the PSTN/IN<br />

network has been built to provide the fixed telephony service, and the mobile networks have been built to<br />

support mobile telephony and data services. The aforementioned services run on separate <strong>in</strong>frastructures. The<br />

Internet has been placed on top and (by def<strong>in</strong>ition) may use any access and core network technology, but still<br />

needs it’s own <strong>in</strong>frastructure to handle subscribers.<br />

The current approach allows only a few players to dom<strong>in</strong>ate the market while new services are difficult and<br />

effort/cost/time-consum<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>troduce due to slow standardisation progress and difficulties to <strong>in</strong>tegrate with<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g core <strong>in</strong>frastructures and service implementations. Another major consequence of build<strong>in</strong>g ‘servicespecific’<br />

networks is the replication of redundant functions. For <strong>in</strong>stance, one of the functionalities of the Home<br />

Location Register (HLR) <strong>in</strong> mobile networks is subscriber authentication and authorization. If the same<br />

subscriber also utilizes an Internet service, this function cannot be reused. Currently, authentication and<br />

authorization is set up <strong>in</strong>dividually for each service.<br />

Additionally, up-to-date networks use the traditional architectural segmentation of network types <strong>in</strong> core, access<br />

and user-equipment doma<strong>in</strong>s, whereby the core network is responsible for “manag<strong>in</strong>g” user requirements <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of switch<strong>in</strong>g/rout<strong>in</strong>g, bandwidth/QoS reservations, authentication and tariff<strong>in</strong>g, and the access network<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure (Local Exchange, Base Station Controller, Network Access Servers, etc) is typically limited to<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g connectivity of the user equipment to the core. Furthermore, exist<strong>in</strong>g access <strong>in</strong>frastructures follow a<br />

“monolithic” approach whereby systems are vertically <strong>in</strong>tegrated and exhibit low flexibility and customisability.<br />

In this context, network services and even applications offered by “third-party” providers are dependent on, and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly implemented at the core of the operators’ telecommunications networks they deploy. This approach


Page 132 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

frequently results <strong>in</strong> core-network overload and congestion <strong>in</strong> terms of access and network-services<br />

provision<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Therefore, the lack of a novel and consistent approach that would move and/or concentrate <strong>in</strong>terconnectivity<br />

(switch<strong>in</strong>g/rout<strong>in</strong>g), <strong>in</strong>telligence, dynamic service deployment, and service-management processes towards the<br />

edges, is evident. This would enable core networks to be treated as backbone resources be<strong>in</strong>g deployed by and<br />

<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with network services and applications.<br />

Spezialised<br />

Network Elements<br />

Spezialised<br />

Protocols<br />

Subscriber Data<br />

enclosed <strong>in</strong><br />

Network Elements<br />

• a closed environment<br />

• a network for each service<br />

• too complex<br />

• too expensive<br />

No future!<br />

Figure 42: Telecommunications Networks Today<br />

Five steps could be envisaged <strong>in</strong> this evolution strategy;<br />

• Step 1: Get the Data out of the Network Elements<br />

• Step 2: Use a Service-Centric Architecture for new Applications<br />

• Step 3: Integrate Legacy Infrastructure<br />

• Step 4: Move Switch<strong>in</strong>g, and Services Management towards the Networks Edges<br />

• Step 5: Dynamic Service Deployment.<br />

Generic Storage Area Networks (SANs) have been proposed as a solution for the central storage and backup of<br />

persistent data kept <strong>in</strong> various networks elements (HLR, SCP, etc). One approach could be to extend the<br />

deployment of SANs also for enabl<strong>in</strong>g the rapid <strong>in</strong>troduction and flexible provision<strong>in</strong>g of applications. In this<br />

manner <strong>in</strong>formation will be directly available at the access po<strong>in</strong>ts, while security-related and networks<br />

<strong>in</strong>teroperability issues (communications protocols) could be solved through the deployment of widespread and<br />

established Internet and Information Technologies. An adequate open data model will have to be def<strong>in</strong>ed and<br />

developed for this purpose. In this context, the target will be the provision of a common data model address<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the requirements of divergent <strong>in</strong>formation and database technologies (RDBMS, ODL, OQL, etc).<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tegration of legacy <strong>in</strong>frastructures should aim at preserv<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g operators’ <strong>in</strong>vestments and <strong>in</strong> the<br />

same time enable the rapid realisation of new revenue generat<strong>in</strong>g services. This will be accomplished by<br />

def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and implement<strong>in</strong>g the procedures and communications <strong>in</strong>terfaces enabl<strong>in</strong>g the management of legacy<br />

networks resources and retrieval/updates of applications <strong>in</strong>formation currently ‘hidden’ <strong>in</strong> a wide variety of<br />

network elements.<br />

7.5.2.9 European projects<br />

The FLEXINET concepts and architecture are applicable to various access network technologies<br />

(GSM/GPRS/UMTS, WLANs, V5, etc.), but will be focused on the mobile and wireless operator needs (UMTS<br />

& WLAN) for packet switched applications.<br />

Other FP5 and <strong>FP6</strong> projects of <strong>in</strong>terest are , MUPBED, GEMINI, FLEXINET, NGNI, DAVID, LION,<br />

WINMAN


UMTS Nodes B & BTS<br />

FlexiNET Generic Data Interface bus<br />

Storage Area Networks<br />

Core UMTS/GSM Networks<br />

Core UMTS/GSM<br />

Core UMTS/GSM<br />

FlexiNET<br />

FlexiNET<br />

Programmable<br />

Programmable<br />

FlexiNET Data<br />

Services<br />

Services Gateway Access<br />

Access Nodes<br />

Nodes<br />

Nodes (DGWN) (AAN)<br />

(AAN)<br />

7.5.2.10 More <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>:<br />

RNC/BSC<br />

RNC/BSC<br />

RNC/ BSC<br />

FlexiNET<br />

FlexiNET<br />

Programmable<br />

Programmable<br />

FlexiNET UMTS<br />

Services<br />

Services Access Access<br />

Access Nodes<br />

Nodes<br />

Nodes (FUAN) (AAN)<br />

(AAN)<br />

Backbone IP<br />

Networks<br />

Page 133 of 319<br />

RNC/BSC<br />

RNC/BSC IP Router<br />

Gateways<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

FlexiNET<br />

FlexiNET<br />

Programmable<br />

FlexiNET Programmable Services<br />

Services<br />

Services Access Access<br />

Access Nodes<br />

Nodes<br />

Nodes (FSAN) (AAN)<br />

(AAN)<br />

FlexiNET Generic Applications Interface bus<br />

WLAN Access Po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Legacy Telecommunications<br />

Applications and Enterprise<br />

Interwork<strong>in</strong>g<br />

FlexiNET Interwork<strong>in</strong>g Bus with Legacy Switch platforms<br />

Figure 43: FlexiNET generic Network Architecture topology<br />

Access routers, bridges, etc<br />

Third-party<br />

applications<br />

Servers<br />

FlexiNET<br />

• Zhang, J. and Mukherjee, B. “A Review of Fault Management <strong>in</strong> WDM Mesh Networks: Basic<br />

Concepts and Research Challenges”. IEEE Network, March/April 2004. pp. 41-48<br />

• Grover, W.D.”Mesh-Based Survivable Networks: Options and Strategies for Optical, MPLS, SONET,<br />

and ATM Network<strong>in</strong>g”. Prentice Hall, August 2003, ISBN 0-13-494576-X<br />

• Vasseur, J.P., Pickavet, M., Demeester, P. “Network Recovery: Protection and Restoration of Optical,<br />

SONET-SDH, IP, and MPLS”. Morgan Kaufmann Series <strong>in</strong> Network<strong>in</strong>g 2004, 0-12715051-X


7.5.3 IPv6<br />

7.5.3.1 Introduction<br />

Page 134 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

At present, a mature IPv6 stack is available for most popular operat<strong>in</strong>g systems and all major network system<br />

vendors support IPv6 <strong>in</strong> their new equipment. Last year, Ch<strong>in</strong>a deployed the largest production IPv6 network,<br />

CERNET2, currently connect<strong>in</strong>g 200 colleges <strong>in</strong> the country. Given the shortage of IPv4 addresses and the<br />

recent growth of the economy <strong>in</strong> Asia, it is no surprise they are early adopters for the new network protocol. In<br />

Europe and the United States, IPv6 networks are ma<strong>in</strong>ly explored <strong>in</strong> research projects and production<br />

deployment <strong>in</strong>itiatives provid<strong>in</strong>g end-to-end IPv6 connectivity are scarce. Driven by the research projects, tunnel<br />

broker services provid<strong>in</strong>g tunnelled IPv6 access to early adopters all over the world came <strong>in</strong>to existence,<br />

however. Despite the absence of production IPv6 deployment evidences <strong>in</strong> Europe, recent large address<br />

allocations by RIPE NCC to European operators and providers <strong>in</strong>dicate their <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> IPv6. Figure<br />

44 below 157 , <strong>in</strong>dicate that the majority of IPv6 prefix requests are served by RIPE NCC (Réseaux IP Européens<br />

Network Coord<strong>in</strong>ation Centre) and APNIC (Asia Pacific Network Information Centre), ma<strong>in</strong>ly cover<strong>in</strong>g Europe<br />

and Asia.<br />

Figure 44: Distribution of IPv6 allocations by number (left) and by size (right)<br />

The cautiousness of the European and American operators with respect to the large-scale <strong>in</strong>troduction of IPv6<br />

can be motivated by both economical and technical reasons. First, <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 <strong>in</strong> each network device is a<br />

costly operation and the absence of a killer application makes this a risk <strong>in</strong>vestment. Secondly, network services<br />

and applications need to support IPv6. Today, many applications use IP(v4) addresses <strong>in</strong>stead of hostnames,<br />

thereby necessitat<strong>in</strong>g both server and client side software upgrades. The limited number of websites accessible<br />

by IPv6 today reflects this issue.<br />

157 RIPE homepage: http://www.ripe.net/rs/ipv6/stats/


7.5.3.2 State of the art<br />

7.5.3.2.1 CERNET2<br />

Page 135 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Backbone and Usenet<br />

CERNET2 adopts a two-layer hierarchy consist<strong>in</strong>g of backbone and usenet, with the former with the pure IPv6<br />

protocol.<br />

The CERNET2 backbone is based on the high-speed transmission network of CERNET, which l<strong>in</strong>ks the<br />

CERNET2 core nodes <strong>in</strong> Beijng, Shanghai, Guangzhou and other seventeen cities at a speed of 2.5-10 Gbps.<br />

The network center of CERNET2 is located <strong>in</strong> Ts<strong>in</strong>ghua University, Beij<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The CERNET2 usenet is a trial network for the research of colleges, universities and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

Adopt<strong>in</strong>g the IPv6 protocol, it accesses the CERNET2 core nodes through high-speed MAN (Metropolitan Area<br />

Network), optical fiber connection or high-speed distance l<strong>in</strong>e. Pek<strong>in</strong>g University, Ts<strong>in</strong>ghua University and<br />

other 200 famous colleges and universities will become the first batch of CERNET2 users.<br />

CERNET2 Core Node<br />

GigaPoP, core node of CERNET will be set up <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g, Shanghai, Guangzhou and other seventeen cities,<br />

each capable of provid<strong>in</strong>g 1~10Gbps IPv6 high-speed access services for more than ten users. In contrast, the<br />

Beij<strong>in</strong>g core node can provide such services for more than 30 users.<br />

CNGI-6IX, National/International Internet Center<br />

CNGI-6IX, the national/<strong>in</strong>ternational NGI exchange center has been established <strong>in</strong> Ts<strong>in</strong>ghua University, Beij<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

It will provide 1~10Gbps <strong>in</strong>terconnection for NGI <strong>in</strong> the country, and 45-155 Mbps <strong>in</strong>terconnection for NGI <strong>in</strong><br />

North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific Region, as well as other countries and regions 158.<br />

7.5.3.2.2 European IPv6 deployment <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

The European Commission supports IPv6 <strong>in</strong>vestigation by fund<strong>in</strong>g several <strong>IST</strong> projects tackl<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 issues. An<br />

overview of all <strong>IST</strong> IPv6 projects can be found on the IPv6 Cluster homepage [2]. The European projects<br />

mentioned below focus explicitly on IPv6 deployment and assessment by construct<strong>in</strong>g large scale IPv6<br />

networks.<br />

6NET 159<br />

Objectives:<br />

• Install and operate an <strong>in</strong>ternational pilot IPv6 network with both static and mobile components <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to ga<strong>in</strong> a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of IPv6 deployment issues. This network will primarily use native IPv6<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ks (<strong>in</strong>itially runn<strong>in</strong>g at 155 Mbps and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g to 2.5 Gbps <strong>in</strong> the second year), although<br />

encapsulation over IPv4 <strong>in</strong>frastructure may be necessary <strong>in</strong> some cases.<br />

• Test the migration strategies for <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 networks with exist<strong>in</strong>g IPv4 <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

• Introduce and test new IPv6 services and applications, as well as legacy services and applications on<br />

IPv6 <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

• Evaluate address allocation, rout<strong>in</strong>g and DNS operation for IPv6 networks.<br />

• Collaborate with other IPv6 activities and standardisation bodies.<br />

• Promote IPv6 technology.<br />

Euro6IX 160<br />

The first objective of the Euro6IX project is to research an appropriate architecture to design and deploy the first<br />

Pan-European non-commercial IPv6 Internet Exchange (IX) Network. It will connect several regional neutral<br />

IPv6 Internet Exchange po<strong>in</strong>ts across Europe, and achieve the same level of robustness and service quality as<br />

currently offered by IPv4 Internet Exchange Networks.<br />

The second objective is to use the deployed IPv6 IX <strong>in</strong>frastructure to research, test and validate IPv6-based<br />

applications and services.<br />

As a third objective, the network built with<strong>in</strong> the Euro6IX project will be open to specific user groups (exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and to be created), who will be connect<strong>in</strong>g to the Euro6IX network by means of a variety of access technologies<br />

158 http://www.edu.cn<br />

159 http://www.6net.org<br />

160 http://www.euro6ix.org


Page 136 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

– mobile, xDSL, cable – and <strong>in</strong>ternetwork<strong>in</strong>g with legacy IPv4 networks and services, to test the performance of<br />

future IPv6 networks, and non-commercial native IPv6 advanced services and applications. The network’s<br />

Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) excludes the possibility of carry<strong>in</strong>g commercial traffic.<br />

The fourth objective of the project is dissem<strong>in</strong>ation, liaison and coord<strong>in</strong>ation with clusters, fora, standards<br />

organizations (e.g. the IETF and RIPE) and third parties, with particular consideration for <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ation with peer projects.<br />

GÉANT2 (dual stack IPv6 network) 161<br />

Objectives:<br />

• To plan, build and operate a multi-gigabit pan-European backbone research network <strong>in</strong>terconnect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Europe's national research and education networks (NRENs), over which a suite of advanced services<br />

will be offered to meet the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly demand<strong>in</strong>g requirements of Europe’s research and education<br />

community<br />

• To conduct jo<strong>in</strong>t research <strong>in</strong>to the development of network<strong>in</strong>g technologies and services, with the<br />

primary aim of develop<strong>in</strong>g ideas from concept to production service to directly serve the users of<br />

GÉANT2 and its connected NRENs<br />

• To support effectively and directly projects and users who have advanced network<strong>in</strong>g requirements<br />

• To pursue <strong>in</strong>itiatives targeted at clos<strong>in</strong>g the 'digital divide', through both <strong>in</strong>-depth analysis of the picture<br />

of research network<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g areas and the provision of direct support<br />

• To exam<strong>in</strong>e the future of research network<strong>in</strong>g, explor<strong>in</strong>g the case for the susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of research and<br />

education network<strong>in</strong>g beyond the conclusion of the project.<br />

7.5.3.3 Issues and trends:<br />

As mentioned <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction, application support for IPv6 can be considered as the ma<strong>in</strong> technical issue<br />

prevent<strong>in</strong>g IPv6 adoption by end-users. Fortunately, the IPv6 Ready Logo Program addresses this problem.<br />

IPv6 Ready! Logo for Applications 162<br />

The IPv6 forum plays a major role to br<strong>in</strong>g together <strong>in</strong>dustrial actors, to develop and deploy the new generation<br />

of IP protocols. Contrary to IPv4, which started with a small closed group of implementers, the universality of<br />

IPv6 leads to a huge number of implementations. Interoperability has always been considered as a critical<br />

feature <strong>in</strong> the Internet community.<br />

Due to the large number of IPv6 implementations, it is important to provide the market a strong signal prov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the level of <strong>in</strong>teroperability across various products.<br />

To avoid confusion <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d of customers, a globally unique logo program should be def<strong>in</strong>ed. The IPv6 logo<br />

will give confidence to users that IPv6 is currently operational. It will also be a clear <strong>in</strong>dication that the<br />

technology will still be used <strong>in</strong> the future. To summarize, this logo program will contribute to the feel<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

IPv6 is available and ready to be used.<br />

The IPv6 Logo Program consists of three phases<br />

• Phase 1: In a first stage, the Logo will <strong>in</strong>dicate that the product <strong>in</strong>cludes IPv6 mandatory core protocols<br />

and can <strong>in</strong>teroperate with other IPv6 implementations.<br />

• Phase 2: The "IPv6 ready" step implies a proper care, technical consensus and clear technical<br />

references. The IPv6 ready logo will <strong>in</strong>dicate that a product has successfully satisfied strong<br />

requirements stated by the IPv6 Logo Committee (v6LC).<br />

• To avoid confusion, the logo "IPv6 Ready" will be generic. The v6LC will def<strong>in</strong>e the test profiles with<br />

associated requirements for specific functionalities.<br />

• Phase 3: Same as Phase 2 with IPsec mandated.<br />

7.5.3.4 Gap analysis:<br />

Currently, operators judge the f<strong>in</strong>ancial risk associated with massive end-to-end IPv6 support cannot be<br />

justified. Identification of killer applications could boost IPv6 deployment.<br />

7.5.3.5 More <strong>in</strong>formation:<br />

IPv6 Cluster homepage: http://www.ist-ipv6.org/<strong>in</strong>dex.php<br />

161 http://www.geant2.net<br />

162 http://www.ipv6ready.org


8. Market developments & policy aspects<br />

8.1 Introduction<br />

Page 137 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

This chapter <strong>in</strong>cludes a complete set of EU country studies, as well as case studies of a few number of non-EU<br />

key broadband countries. The case studies ma<strong>in</strong>ly concentrate on success stories describ<strong>in</strong>g some of the front<br />

runners <strong>in</strong> broadband development. The idea is to analyse examples of successes and failures <strong>in</strong> a number of<br />

selected countries, which can be used as guidance <strong>in</strong> formulation of future policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> a European<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g. The synthesis of all the <strong>in</strong>dividual country analyses is then the subject of the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapter.<br />

The EU country studies come <strong>in</strong> two varieties: an <strong>in</strong>-depth approach for several countries of particular <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

for broadband, and more condensed country studies for the other EU countries plus one for the EU as a whole.<br />

The EU countries selected for the <strong>in</strong>-depth approach are F<strong>in</strong>land, Denmark Germany, Sweden, and the UK.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land and Denmark are chosen as both countries have a high rank<strong>in</strong>g with regard to penetration of broadband<br />

services. F<strong>in</strong>land provides a special case as they are host<strong>in</strong>g a very strong telecom <strong>in</strong>dustry. Denmark has a<br />

moderate telecom <strong>in</strong>dustry but has a tradition as an advanced telecom market with regard to usage and<br />

regulation. For example, it has recently been ranked 1 <strong>in</strong> IDC’s <strong>in</strong>formation society <strong>in</strong>dex 163 . Germany has been<br />

selected because it is the most important market <strong>in</strong> Europe. Sweden is not only advanced <strong>in</strong> telecommunications<br />

<strong>in</strong> general, but is also leader <strong>in</strong> fibre-to-the-home technology. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the UK is the country with the lowest<br />

market share for the <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecoms operator.<br />

For the non-EU case studies we have selected the US, Japan, South Korea, Canada and Iceland. Clearly, the US<br />

is a key market for broadband development, <strong>in</strong> particular regard<strong>in</strong>g the multiplicity of technologies and<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives. Japan has been very successful at dissem<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g broadband access recently, while South Korea is the<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g broadband country <strong>in</strong> the world. Japan and South Korea have also followed dist<strong>in</strong>ct telecom strategies<br />

which are very different from those applied with<strong>in</strong> Europe. Canada has high broadband penetration despite low<br />

population density, an important challenge for large parts of Europe. F<strong>in</strong>ally, Iceland has been <strong>in</strong>cluded because<br />

it is successful <strong>in</strong> broadband roll-out although there is basically no <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition. All of the non-EU<br />

country studies are of the extended k<strong>in</strong>d.<br />

Altogether, therefore, there are ten <strong>in</strong>-depth and twenty-one condensed country studies. Given the large number<br />

of countries, not all aspects of markets and regulation will be studied <strong>in</strong> every country. Every country study<br />

consists of a short country <strong>in</strong>troduction, an update of the broadband market, an overview of the policies pursued<br />

by public authorities <strong>in</strong> the respective country, and a short conclusion. The <strong>in</strong>-depth studies have more detailed<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on the market developments and on the policies, and typically have also detailed <strong>in</strong>formation on a<br />

number of exemplary local or regional <strong>in</strong>itiatives.<br />

Before com<strong>in</strong>g to the country studies, section 8.1.2 briefly surveys broadband market developments worldwide.<br />

Section 8.1.3 gives a short <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong>to the fundamentals of regulation.<br />

8.1.1 Broadband <strong>in</strong>dicators<br />

In a comparison of <strong>in</strong>dicators for supply of broadband <strong>in</strong> various countries, it is necessary to be aware of<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition of what broadband really is. The OECD def<strong>in</strong>es broadband as a 256 kbps<br />

downstream and at least 64 kbps upstream connection (OECD 2004), the FCC requires high-speed l<strong>in</strong>es faster<br />

than 200 kbps at least <strong>in</strong> one direction (FCC 2002). Some EU publications use 144 kbps <strong>in</strong> one direction as the<br />

limit (EU Communication Committee 2003). These differences are necessary to consider when statistics from<br />

various sources are compared.<br />

As technologies are rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g, it is difficult to focus on exact kbps numbers <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g penetration of<br />

broadband. Maybe a broadband connection should for the time be<strong>in</strong>g be def<strong>in</strong>ed as an always-on connection<br />

capable of stream<strong>in</strong>g music <strong>in</strong> good quality without <strong>in</strong>terruptions. It may however be necessary to change this<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition, if the majority of future broadband services will demand a capacity higher than can be delivered<br />

through such a l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Broadband availability refers to the number of end users which are with<strong>in</strong> the reach of broadband capable access<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts to the core broadband network. In the case of DSL "availability" number refers to the number of upgraded<br />

local exchanges. One can refer to this figure as "theoretical broadband availability" or "supply side availability".<br />

163 http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?conta<strong>in</strong>erId=pr2004_10_28_164010


Page 138 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

This figure is easy to gather (the number of upgraded switches), but it gives an <strong>in</strong>complete picture as this figure<br />

does not tell anyth<strong>in</strong>g about the capacity with<strong>in</strong> the network. Lack of capacity may imply that only a limited<br />

number of users are able to connect – or that user <strong>in</strong> reality only will have a bandwidth, which cannot be termed<br />

as broadband, available. This "practical availability" is also very important especially <strong>in</strong> relation to end user’s<br />

and their broadband experiences.<br />

In addition upgrade of the local exchanges may not be sufficient for reach<strong>in</strong>g all customers. xDSL is distant<br />

dependent: the further away users live from the local exchange, the slower is the connection. Therefore<br />

broadband may not be available for the more distant customers unless additional <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> the access<br />

network are made.<br />

8.1.2 Broadband market developments<br />

After a couple of years <strong>in</strong> which the electronic communication markets had been <strong>in</strong> a somewhat fragile state,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the global economic downturn, high debt rates for some market players due to the cost of 3G<br />

licenses, ill-timed <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> backbone networks and the high prices paid for foreign acquisitions of<br />

operators, the sector has been pick<strong>in</strong>g up momentum over the last year or so. It has managed to do so despite the<br />

persistence of weak economic growth <strong>in</strong> many EU countries. One of the motors of this sectoral recovery has<br />

been the take-off of broadband deployment.<br />

Figure 45 shows the development of Internet and broadband penetration 1998-2004. In 2004 there were <strong>in</strong> total<br />

around 160 million broadband subscribers <strong>in</strong> the world.<br />

Figure 45, Broadband and Internet users worldwide [millions] 164<br />

Wireless and satellite broadband solutions are still relatively new to the market and most broadband users<br />

currently rely on fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e connections to access the Internet (ma<strong>in</strong>ly through DSL or cable modems). Therefore<br />

broadband solutions have ma<strong>in</strong>ly been rolled out <strong>in</strong> areas where sufficient returns on <strong>in</strong>vestments could be<br />

expected, e.g. metropolitan areas or fairly high density areas <strong>in</strong> developed countries. Also the level of gross<br />

national <strong>in</strong>come (GNI) per capita has a high <strong>in</strong>fluence on the expected broadband penetration level, as <strong>in</strong>most<br />

countries broadband connections are relatively expensive. Figure 46 (“Figure 10”) below shows broadband<br />

penetration and choice of technology <strong>in</strong> the top-ten countries.<br />

164 http://www.itu.<strong>in</strong>t/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/Europe_RPM_2005.pdf


Page 139 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 46: Broadband penetration, subscribers per 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants, by technology 165<br />

The high penetration markets <strong>in</strong> Korea, Canada, Iceland, Japan and the US as well as Denmark, Sweden,<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land and the UK will be further described <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>-depth country studies.<br />

The fast growth of subscriber numbers has been accompanied, and at least partly caused, by rapidly fall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prices. The decrease <strong>in</strong> prices is usually, but not always, associated with <strong>in</strong>tensified competition, either on the<br />

same <strong>in</strong>frastructure, or between different <strong>in</strong>frastructures.<br />

165 http://www.itu.<strong>in</strong>t/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/Europe_RPM_2005.pdf


Page 140 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 47: broadband prices <strong>in</strong> the top 15 broadband economies 166<br />

Figure 48: Market share of <strong>in</strong>cumbents <strong>in</strong> old EU Member States 167<br />

166<br />

http://www.itu.<strong>in</strong>t/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/Europe_RPM_2005.pdf<br />

167<br />

Commission Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, Annex to European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2004 (10th report),<br />

Com(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al


Page 141 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Although most telecom markets have become liberalised (see below), the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operators still dom<strong>in</strong>ate the<br />

market for broadband services. Figure 4 illustrates that even <strong>in</strong> countries where telecommunication markets have<br />

been liberalised for some years, the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operators still hold a major market share regard<strong>in</strong>g broadband<br />

connections. S<strong>in</strong>ce xDSL is currently grow<strong>in</strong>g faster than alternative access technologies, <strong>in</strong> particular faster<br />

than cable, the strong position of <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom operators on the xDSL segment would suggest that their<br />

overall market share is likely to further <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the near future.<br />

8.1.3 General regulatory aspects<br />

Telecommunications markets are nowadays liberalised throughout much of the <strong>in</strong>dustrialised world, but<br />

significant differences rema<strong>in</strong>. Liberalisation has always been accompanied by regulation, which can take very<br />

different forms. Even where common pr<strong>in</strong>ciples have been fixed, as with<strong>in</strong> the EU, where an EU-wide<br />

regulatory framework is <strong>in</strong> place, implementation may still differ – for example, <strong>in</strong> Denmark, but not <strong>in</strong> most<br />

other EU countries, unbundl<strong>in</strong>g is also demanded for optical networks. Differences <strong>in</strong> the regulatory framework<br />

conditions of liberalised market are even bigger where there is no set of common pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, such as among the<br />

US, Japan, Korea and the EU.<br />

The basic right to deploy a self-owned <strong>in</strong>frastructure outside the purview of the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator is a corner<br />

stone of the liberalisation of <strong>in</strong>frastructure provision. However, the most common mode of operation of<br />

alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure providers, does not, to any large extent, consist <strong>in</strong> deployment of complete networks,<br />

but rather <strong>in</strong> the establishment of partial networks (backbone or metro) which are <strong>in</strong>terconnected with other<br />

operators’ networks. Regulation is needed to ensure fair competition <strong>in</strong> this situation where market power is<br />

extremely unequal – usually the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator are owners or at least control the “last mile”, i.e. the access<br />

to customers premises, throughout their country, which gives them huge leverage over other operators, <strong>in</strong><br />

addition to an <strong>in</strong>itial market share of 100% at the time of liberalisation. Sometimes this leverage is dim<strong>in</strong>ished<br />

by the presence of alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructures, such as cable TV networks, but then aga<strong>in</strong> sometimes the same<br />

operator controls both. In this context, a key regulatory <strong>in</strong>strument is “local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g”, i.e. giv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

competitors the right to use the <strong>in</strong>cumbents’ customer access. However, this often requires very detailed<br />

technical rules. Other key regulations concern <strong>in</strong>terconnection, frequency attribution, rights of way, and names<br />

and numbers; and f<strong>in</strong>ally, universal service regulation and consumer protection.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> the EU, public network operators have both the right and the obligation to negotiate the <strong>in</strong>terconnection<br />

of their networks with each other, while private network operators do not. All communications providers will,<br />

however, be entitled to make reasonable requests for access to network facilities (such as unbundled local loops,<br />

partial private circuits or wholesale ADSL) from operators designated as hav<strong>in</strong>g Significant Market Power<br />

(SMP). ‘Reasonable’ requests must, for example, be technically feasible. The SMP operators will be under an<br />

obligation to provide this access on fair, non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory and reasonable terms. Aga<strong>in</strong>, even though<br />

<strong>in</strong>terconnection regulation is based on the same general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples with<strong>in</strong> the EU, there are still substantial<br />

differences between member countries with regard to the terms and rates for <strong>in</strong>terconnection 168 .<br />

168 See 9 th implementation report from the Commission and an updated version of the regulatory aspects from the SERENATE project<br />

deliverable D7: http://www.serenate.org/publications/d7-serenate.pdf and<br />

http://europa.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/<strong>in</strong>formation_society/topics/ecomm/doc/all_about/implementation_enforcement/annualreports/9threport/com2003071<br />

5en.pdf


8.2 European Union<br />

8.2.1 Introduction<br />

Page 142 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The EU 25 <strong>in</strong>cludes both the long-established market economies of Western Europe, and the newly-reformed<br />

market economies of Eastern Europe, which acceded <strong>in</strong> May 2004. However, significant <strong>in</strong>come and<br />

development differences rema<strong>in</strong>, which is reflected <strong>in</strong> the broadband market.<br />

8.2.2 The broadband market<br />

Broadband penetration is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rapidly across the EU, but at vary<strong>in</strong>g speeds and from vary<strong>in</strong>g start<strong>in</strong>g<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts. As a rule of thumb, digitally advanced Nordic countries and the highly cabled Benelux do particularly<br />

well, while the new member states and Greece lag beh<strong>in</strong>d. The EU-wide penetration rate nearly doubled <strong>in</strong><br />

2004.<br />

20%<br />

18%<br />

16%<br />

14%<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

0%<br />

1% 2%<br />

2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4%<br />

EU Broadband penetration rate<br />

6%<br />

8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 9%<br />

11%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

10% 10% 10%<br />

January 05<br />

15%<br />

15%<br />

16%<br />

19%<br />

18%<br />

EL SK CZ LV CY EU10 PL IE HU LT SI IT ES LU PT DE EU25 MT EU15 AT EE UK FR FI SE BE DK NL<br />

Figure 49: Broadband penetration on 1 January 2005 (Source: EU Commission)<br />

In terms of technology, xDSL is the dom<strong>in</strong>ant technology, often because it is the only one available. Cable is a<br />

serious competitor where cable TV networks did exist, but its geographical coverage is limited. Fibre-to-the-<br />

Home deployment is significant only <strong>in</strong> Sweden and Italy, and to a lesser extent <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands and<br />

Denmark. Satellite is considered <strong>in</strong> several large countries as an alternative for rural areas, but uptake rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />

fairly low. 3G networks have considerable numbers of subscribers <strong>in</strong> Italy and the UK, and – relative to their<br />

small population – <strong>in</strong> Sweden, Denmark and Austria, too. Powerl<strong>in</strong>e communications have no significant market<br />

share anywhere. WiFi/WiMax implementation rema<strong>in</strong>s localised and do not yet provide wide geographical<br />

coverage.<br />

Technology Share<br />

DSL 80 %<br />

Cable 18 %<br />

Other 2 %<br />

Table 13: Share of broadband technologies <strong>in</strong> EU – December 2004 (Source of data: ECTA)


8.2.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 143 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The current regulatory framework 169 , which dates from 2002 and, is generally pro-competitive, liberaliz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

service provision, facilitat<strong>in</strong>g market entry makes and sett<strong>in</strong>g up a system of <strong>in</strong>dependent National Regulatory<br />

Authorities (NRA). In particular, it has made local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the telephone network mandatory, which<br />

is a key <strong>in</strong>gredient to <strong>in</strong>troduce competition <strong>in</strong> the DSL market. However, it does not require separation of the<br />

various networks; therefore, cable and telephone networks <strong>in</strong> several member states are owned by the same<br />

company, reduc<strong>in</strong>g facilities-based competition.<br />

The Commission issues annual implementation reports to verify transposition and implementation <strong>in</strong> the member<br />

states. While the framework should have been transposed <strong>in</strong> the old member states by 2003 and <strong>in</strong> the new<br />

member states upon accession, by October 2004 five Member States (Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia,<br />

Greece, Luxembourg) still needed to adopt primary legislation to transpose the framework, and eight Member<br />

States (Spa<strong>in</strong>, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia) still needed to adopt secondary<br />

legislation 170 . The Communications Committee (COCOM), a work<strong>in</strong>g group of regulators, attempts to ensure<br />

that the practical application of the rules also conforms to the pro-competitive pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the directives.<br />

Look<strong>in</strong>g beyond purely telecommunications regulation, the European Union has started to develop a broadbased<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation society policy with the eEurope <strong>in</strong>itative 171 at the end of 1999, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the eEurope 2002<br />

action plan, which focused on <strong>in</strong>frastructures, skills and content. It was subsequently extended to eEurope<br />

2005 172 , and it now be<strong>in</strong>g revised aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the i2010 <strong>in</strong>itiative 173 , which puts the emphasis on <strong>in</strong>formation space,<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation and <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> research, and <strong>in</strong>clusion. Most of the specific broadband policy, which emerged as a<br />

European issue only at the end of 2002 174 , is conducted with<strong>in</strong> that policy framework.<br />

In January 2003, the Commission hosted the European Broadband Day 175 , followed by Broadband Content and<br />

Broadband Regional workshops later that year. After identify<strong>in</strong>g broadband as a key challenge for electronic<br />

communications policy 176 , it issued a Communication on national broadband strategies, as well as an annexed<br />

staff work<strong>in</strong>g document detail<strong>in</strong>g strategies pursued by all old member states, <strong>in</strong> May 2004 177 .<br />

A particular concern for EU policy is the roll-out of broadband across <strong>in</strong> rural areas as part of the e-<strong>in</strong>clusion<br />

strategy. An eEurope advisory work group issued recommendations <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g demand aggregation of services,<br />

deployment of public access po<strong>in</strong>ts, broadband as a priority for the structural funds, encourag<strong>in</strong>g eServices and<br />

eContent, private/public partnerships and called for a pan-European <strong>in</strong>itiative for very sparsely populated<br />

areas 178 .<br />

In addition, the EU is fund<strong>in</strong>g a number of research projects under the 6 th framework programme, <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

develop technologies able to provide broadband access more efficiently and more conveniently, thus further<strong>in</strong>g<br />

uptake. In the same programme, concertation actions such as the present BREAD are funded <strong>in</strong> order to create<br />

coherence between technological progress and socio-economic conditions.<br />

8.2.4 Conclusion<br />

Broadband penetration is grow<strong>in</strong>g very fast <strong>in</strong> the EU, but levels of deployment are very uneven, both between<br />

countries and with<strong>in</strong> countries between urban and rural areas. The EU policy on broadband is currently focussed<br />

on three major axes: ensur<strong>in</strong>g a competitive framework, address<strong>in</strong>g broadband gaps <strong>in</strong> rural areas, and<br />

technological development. Moreover, there is a number of Internet policies, such as public access po<strong>in</strong>ts, ehealth,<br />

e-education and e-government, which cont<strong>in</strong>ue to have an impact on broadband development.<br />

169 Framework 2002/21/EC, Access 2002/19/EC, Universal Service 2002/22/EC, Authorisation 2002/20/EC, Competition 2002/77/EC and<br />

ePrivacy Directives 2002/58/EC<br />

170 European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2004, COM(2004) 759 f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

171 COM (1999) 687 f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

172 COM(2002) 263 f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

173 COM(2005) 229 of 1 June 2006<br />

174 SPEECH/02/606 by Commissioner Liikanen, "The eEurope Broadband Strategy" at The European Telecommmunications Network<br />

Operators' Association (ETNO) Conference 'Mak<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Happen <strong>in</strong> Europe' Brussels, 3 December 2002<br />

175 http://europa.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/<strong>in</strong>formation_society/eeurope/2005/all_about/broadband/<strong>in</strong>dex_en.htm<br />

176 COM(2004) 61 f<strong>in</strong>al Communication from the Commission “Connect<strong>in</strong>g Europe at high speed: recent developments <strong>in</strong> the sector of<br />

electronic communications”<br />

177 COM(2004) 369 f<strong>in</strong>al Communication from the Commission “Connect<strong>in</strong>g Europe at High Speed: National Broadband Strategies”<br />

178 eEurope Advisory Group Work Group No.1: Digital Divide and Broadband Territorial Coverage Written Recommendations, 29 June<br />

2004


8.3 Austria<br />

8.3.1 Introduction<br />

Page 144 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Austria is a federal republic comprised of n<strong>in</strong>e prov<strong>in</strong>ces and encompasses a geographic area of 83,853 square<br />

kilometers. The population numbers more than eight million people (8,032,557 <strong>in</strong> 2002), about 1.6 million<br />

(1,550,123 <strong>in</strong> 2002) of whom live <strong>in</strong> the capital, Vienna. 179 Ma<strong>in</strong> sources for <strong>in</strong>formation on ICT <strong>in</strong> Austria are<br />

Statistik Austria 180, 181 , <strong>in</strong> particular the surveys on ICT usage <strong>in</strong> households 2004 182 , on ICT usage <strong>in</strong> households<br />

2003 183 , on e-Commerce 2003/2004 184 and on e-Commerce 2002/2003 185 ; the Austrian Regulatory Authority for<br />

Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g and Telecommunications (RTR-GmbH) 186 ; Prognos AG 187 ; and Preslmayr & Partners 188, 189 .<br />

8.3.2 The broadband market<br />

Figure 50 roughly describes the penetration of ICT services with<strong>in</strong> companies and households, available <strong>in</strong> 2003<br />

and 2004. Nearly 100% of 29.000 Austrian companies with more than n<strong>in</strong>e employees are equipped with PCs<br />

and Internet access l<strong>in</strong>es. While <strong>in</strong> 2003 the majority of the Internet access l<strong>in</strong>es were narrowband (Dial up,<br />

ISDN), <strong>in</strong> 2004 broadband access l<strong>in</strong>es (ADSL, UMTS, cable modems) have overtaken narrowband access<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es. Additionally, 18% of the companies are able to access the Internet by mobile phones.<br />

Figure 50: Penetration of ICT services with<strong>in</strong> companies and households <strong>in</strong> 2003 and 2004<br />

(without WLAN and GPRS)<br />

179<br />

Preslmayr & Partners and Auditor Treuhand GmbH (2003). Invest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Austria, 5th, completely revised edition, Vienna,<br />

http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/2003%20Invest<strong>in</strong>g%20<strong>in</strong>%20Austria%205.pdf<br />

180<br />

http://www.austria.gv.at<br />

181<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at<br />

182<br />

STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2004). Hauptergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über den E<strong>in</strong>satz von Informations- und<br />

Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT) <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2004 <strong>in</strong> Österreich. http://www.statistik.at/fachbereich_forschung/ikt.pdf<br />

183<br />

STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). IKT-E<strong>in</strong>satz <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003, Ergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über den E<strong>in</strong>satz von<br />

Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT) <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003 <strong>in</strong> Österreich,<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at/pub/neuersche<strong>in</strong>ungen/ikt_web.pdf<br />

184<br />

STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2004). Hauptergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über E-Commerce 2003/2004 <strong>in</strong> Österreich.<br />

http://www.statistik.at/fachbereich_forschung/ecommerce.pdf<br />

185<br />

STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). E-Commerce 2002/03, Ergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über E-Commerce 2002/03.<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at/pub/neuersche<strong>in</strong>ungen/ecommerce_web.pdf<br />

186<br />

http://www.rtr.at<br />

187<br />

Prognos AG, http://www.prognos.de<br />

188<br />

http://www.preslmayr.com<br />

189<br />

http://www.net4you.co.at/user/preslmayr/<strong>in</strong>vest/<strong>in</strong>vest.htm


Page 145 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g households a different picture is obta<strong>in</strong>ed: 40% of all 6.4 million households are connected to the<br />

Internet with a majority of narrow band access l<strong>in</strong>es (25% <strong>in</strong> 2003, 23% <strong>in</strong> 2004) and a smaller percentage<br />

perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to broadband access (8% <strong>in</strong> 2003, 14 % <strong>in</strong> 2004). The number of available PCs amounts to about<br />

53%.<br />

8.3.2.1 Demand 190 191<br />

Companies192 : Present applications by companies are mostly narrowband and can thus be used by dial-up<br />

connections. At present, only a few applications exist that <strong>in</strong>clude real broadband contents, i.e. contents that are<br />

to be transmitted <strong>in</strong> real time to allow their successful use. In the follow<strong>in</strong>g applications by companies are listed<br />

under four head<strong>in</strong>gs:<br />

• Utilisation of commercial Internet services<br />

- bank<strong>in</strong>g and f<strong>in</strong>ancial services (70%)<br />

- market observation services (55%)<br />

- purchase of digital products (36%) or other non digital products (19%)<br />

- services for professional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (22%)<br />

- tourism book<strong>in</strong>g services (37%)<br />

• Utilisation of e-government services<br />

- download of forms (73%)<br />

- <strong>in</strong>formation retrieval (64%)<br />

- transmission of filled <strong>in</strong> forms to public <strong>in</strong>stitutions (43%)<br />

- complete handl<strong>in</strong>g of all regulatory tasks (21%)<br />

• Provision of Internet services<br />

- market<strong>in</strong>g of own products (50%)<br />

- onl<strong>in</strong>e access to product catalogs and pric<strong>in</strong>g lists (27%)<br />

- provision of customer specific service access (12%)<br />

- sales services (9%) and after-sales services (7%)<br />

- download service for digital products (6%)<br />

• Telework<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- This application is used by about 70% of all companies with at least one employee us<strong>in</strong>g that service.<br />

In terms of safety, companies take the follow<strong>in</strong>g measures:<br />

- implementation of antivirus software (89%)<br />

- regular update of antivirus software (64%)<br />

- <strong>in</strong>stallation of firewalls (56%)<br />

- off-site data back-up (39%)<br />

- use of safe servers (35%)<br />

- use of encryption (13%)<br />

- use of digital signature (3%)<br />

Households193 : In the first quarter of 2003 the Internet was used by 2.6 million (41%) of all persons <strong>in</strong> the age of<br />

16 to 74 years. This is an <strong>in</strong>crease of 4% <strong>in</strong> comparison to the second quarter of 2002. While the percentage of<br />

Internet use of persons aged 16 to 24 is about 67%, only 4% of all persons aged 65 to 74 use the Internet.<br />

Additionally the results show that the Internet is more often used by men (47%) compared with women (36%)<br />

and also more often by persons with an academic degree (80%) <strong>in</strong> comparison to persons with certificate from<br />

secondary school (23%). The Internet was used daily all together by 1.2 million persons (47%), at least once a<br />

week by 1.1 million (42%) and at least once a month by 0.3 million (10%).<br />

27% of all persons used the Internet <strong>in</strong> the first quarter of 2003 one to two hours per week. Another 27% used<br />

the Internet three to five hours per week. And the percentage of people who used the Internet less than one hour<br />

190 STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). IKT-E<strong>in</strong>satz <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003, Ergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über den E<strong>in</strong>satz von<br />

Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT) <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003 <strong>in</strong> Österreich,<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at/pub/neuersche<strong>in</strong>ungen/ikt_web.pdf<br />

191 STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). E-Commerce 2002/03, Ergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über E-Commerce 2002/03.<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at/pub/neuersche<strong>in</strong>ungen/ecommerce_web.pdf<br />

192 STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). E-Commerce 2002/03, Ergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über E-Commerce 2002/03.<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at/pub/neuersche<strong>in</strong>ungen/ecommerce_web.pdf, p. 26, 29, 30<br />

193 STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). IKT-E<strong>in</strong>satz <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003, Ergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über den E<strong>in</strong>satz von<br />

Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT) <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003 <strong>in</strong> Österreich,<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at/pub/neuersche<strong>in</strong>ungen/ikt_web.pdf, p.28-32


Page 146 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

per week was about 18%. The Internet was used by 1.9 million persons (74%) at home, by 1.2 million (47%) at<br />

their work place, by 0.31 million at their tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g places and by 0.39 million at other places, e.g. Internet coffee<br />

bars, post offices, public agencies.<br />

Reasons for Internet resistance <strong>in</strong> households194 : While nearly every Austrian company is connected to the<br />

Internet and also a relevant portion of households have Internet access a still rather high percentage of private<br />

users (<strong>in</strong>dividual persons) rejects (fig. 1) an Internet connection at home, from various reasons. Thus more than<br />

55% of the people without Internet access state a lack of usefulness of the Internet use, 27% claim that they do<br />

not have the appropriate competence to handle Internet services successfully. For others purchase costs (27%) or<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous costs (21%) are too high. F<strong>in</strong>ally, about 15% can use the Internet at other places.<br />

Applications195 : Most applications of the present Internet use are narrowband and can thus be used by dial-up<br />

connections.. At present, only a few applications exist that <strong>in</strong>clude real broadband contents, i.e. contents that are<br />

to be transmitted <strong>in</strong> real time to allow their successful use. Such contents are196 :<br />

• onl<strong>in</strong>e gambl<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

• half screen video,<br />

• full screen video,<br />

• TV over IP with DVD quality<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong> (mostly narrowband) applications are listed, accord<strong>in</strong>g to their frequency of use dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the first quarter of 2003:<br />

• communication by e-mail: 88%<br />

• search and utilise <strong>in</strong>formation about goods and services: 65%<br />

• read<strong>in</strong>g/ download<strong>in</strong>g newspapers, magaz<strong>in</strong>es and sth. near it: 39%<br />

• search and utilise travel and accommodation <strong>in</strong>formation: 36%<br />

• search and utilise <strong>in</strong>formation from websites of public: 35%<br />

• Internet bank<strong>in</strong>g: 30%<br />

• other forms of communication (e.g. chatt<strong>in</strong>g): 29%<br />

• play<strong>in</strong>g/download<strong>in</strong>g of games and music: 28%<br />

• use of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and educational services: 28%<br />

• download<strong>in</strong>g of forms of public <strong>in</strong>stitutions: 25%<br />

• onl<strong>in</strong>e shopp<strong>in</strong>g: 25%<br />

Safety measures197 : To protect their Internet use about 30% of the private users implemented and updated an anti<br />

virus program. And 23% of the Internet users applied identification codes to protect their Internet use.<br />

8.3.2.2 Supply 198<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g n<strong>in</strong>e transmission and access technologies are relevant <strong>in</strong> Austria:<br />

• DSL In May 2003 already 80% of the Austrian population could be supplied by ADSL.<br />

• Cable TV (coaxial or hybrid fiber-coaxial). This technology is more widespread <strong>in</strong> Austria than other<br />

technologies.<br />

• Fibre Optic Technology: Fibre to the home is not realized by now.<br />

• Power L<strong>in</strong>e Cable: A use of that technology is expected, if at all, <strong>in</strong> the medium-term only for <strong>in</strong>-house<br />

systems.<br />

• Wireless Local Loop (WLL): Though frequency bands are available <strong>in</strong> Austria, by now a promis<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess plan does not exist. Therefore <strong>in</strong> 2003 WLL is not used despite its evident advantages to cover<br />

Austrian rural areas. One essential reason for this could be high costs result<strong>in</strong>g from the small number<br />

of equipment units.<br />

194 STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). p.23, 24<br />

195 STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). p.32 et seqq.<br />

196 Cuny-Pierron, A. (2004). Pro Breitband (<strong>in</strong>: ispa newsletter, Weites Land, breites Band, Nr. 1 • 2004),<br />

http://www.ispa.at/downloads/f6253add2fc9_ispa104_dr_f<strong>in</strong>al-version.pdf, p.5<br />

197 STAT<strong>IST</strong>IK AUSTRIA (2003). IKT-E<strong>in</strong>satz <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003, Ergebnisse der Europäischen Erhebung über den E<strong>in</strong>satz von<br />

Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT) <strong>in</strong> Haushalten 2003 <strong>in</strong> Österreich,<br />

ftp://www.statistik.at/pub/neuersche<strong>in</strong>ungen/ikt_web.pdf, p. 32<br />

198 RTR-GmbH (2003). Breitband<strong>in</strong>itiative 2003: Österreich auf dem Weg zum Spitzenplatz <strong>in</strong> der Informationsgesellschaft (Breitband<br />

Status Report), http://www.rtr.at/web.nsf/lookuid/0808B704869D1DDFC1256E55006612EC/$file/Breitbandstatusbericht.pdf,. p.16 et<br />

seqq.


Page 147 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN): This is one of the ma<strong>in</strong> wireless technologies <strong>in</strong> Austria.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>gly hot spots are <strong>in</strong>stalled particularly because of high private demand. The latter may be<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed by a rather low price for use of access to high data rates. Compared to other countries<br />

penetration rate of hot spots is quite high. Thus with 127 hot spots Vienna is on first place followed by<br />

New York with 115 and San Francisco with 102 hot spots.<br />

• GPRS: Besides WLAN it represents the preferred wireless Internet access.<br />

• UMTS<br />

• Satellite: This technology is regarded as promis<strong>in</strong>g for rural. However because of the high <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

costs the demand for such a system is weak by now and does not <strong>in</strong>dicate a rapid development.<br />

The various technologies available are offered by many providers. Thus the access to the broadband cable<br />

technology is provided by all together 90 companies, many of which use the network <strong>in</strong>frastructure of Austria<br />

Telekom. Here the most important ones are for199, 200 :<br />

• ADSL: Aon Speed (Telekom Austria), UTA ADSL Wild Cherry, T-Onl<strong>in</strong>e dsl, Inode, YCN or EUnet<br />

• ADSL unbundled: Inode xdsl@home, Hostprofis, UTA Complete, silverserver SILVER:ADSL, eTel<br />

direct or gdsl.at<br />

• ATM: ATnet<br />

• Cable: Chello, Kabelsignal, Liwest (OÖ), Salzburg AG or BKF<br />

• DSL: Cnet<br />

• FTTH: blizznet.at or ATnet<br />

• WLAN: Funknetz.at, ewave.at, cyberservice.org, Alpha NetWork, wavenet.at, rf-funkInternet, funklanost.at,<br />

netpark.at or kt-net.at<br />

• SDSL: hotze.com, Na-NET, Net4You, Alpha NetWork, globalcore, kapper.net, ACW, Silver Server,<br />

Hartberg Onl<strong>in</strong>e or CSO.net<br />

• PLC: L<strong>in</strong>zAG<br />

• xDSL: Inode, mm c , L<strong>in</strong>z Net, UTA, cworks or yc net:works<br />

Similarly access to DSL systems is offered by a variety of providers. On that basis competition is possible that<br />

causes different price systems as described with<strong>in</strong> Table 14201 .<br />

Table 14: M<strong>in</strong>imal and maximal prices for access and monthly costs for the use of broadband access <strong>in</strong> Austria<br />

199 Madmaxx.onl<strong>in</strong>e (2005). Internet-Provider, http://www.8ung.at/madmaxx/provider.html<br />

200 Preisvergleich Internet Services AG (2005). ISP-Preisvergleich für Festverb<strong>in</strong>dungen, http://www.geizhals.at/isp/<br />

201 Preisvergleich Internet Services AG (2005). ISP-Preisvergleich für Festverb<strong>in</strong>dungen, http://www.geizhals.at/isp/


8.3.3 Broadband policy 202<br />

Page 148 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

It is assumed that sufficient broadband communication networks would grow also without public <strong>in</strong>tervention.<br />

However, growth would be slow and focussed on urban areas thus caus<strong>in</strong>g disadvantages for Austrian<br />

competitiveness compared to other European countries. Additionally the attractiveness of rural areas would be<br />

weakened. On that basis various <strong>in</strong>tervention measures both on European level and on national level are<br />

discussed. On federal level direct <strong>in</strong>terventions are <strong>in</strong>itiated from various governmental departments: (1)<br />

Education, Science and Culture 203 (2) Traffic, Innovation and Technology 204 (3) Economy and Labour 205 . The<br />

focus of these <strong>in</strong>itiatives is to support research and developmental projects, development of new products and<br />

techniques and programs to improve user competence. Indirect measures ma<strong>in</strong>ly focus on various tax relief for<br />

companies. Additionally public measures are <strong>in</strong>itiated to extend and reconstruct the communications<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> Austrian prov<strong>in</strong>ces as Niederösterreich. Of course, all measures must comply with legal<br />

competition requirements.<br />

8.3.4 Conclusion<br />

With regard to broadband penetration Austria fell back <strong>in</strong> comparison to other European States after a strong<br />

start <strong>in</strong> 1997 (Cable modem) and 1999 (ADSL) 206 . To improve the situation various measures are to be taken<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g and Telecommunications28 . Particularly the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g measures are recommended:<br />

• Education and sensitization of general public with regard to benefits of Internet use<br />

• Creation of user friendly technology by perform<strong>in</strong>g usability studies<br />

• Measures to <strong>in</strong>crease user competence <strong>in</strong> handl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and communication technology<br />

• Creation of content that is adapted to user needs and assures benefits by immediate availability<br />

• Achiev<strong>in</strong>g regulation measures compatible with rules for fair competition<br />

• Measures to extend and improve communication <strong>in</strong>frastructures <strong>in</strong> handicapped (rural) areas<br />

• Increase of the number of access public access po<strong>in</strong>ts (e.g. public library, kiosk systems...)<br />

202<br />

RTR-GmbH (2003). Breitband<strong>in</strong>itiative 2003: Österreich auf dem Weg zum Spitzenplatz <strong>in</strong> der Informationsgesellschaft (Breitband<br />

Status Report). http://www.rtr.at/web.nsf/lookuid/0808B704869D1DDFC1256E55006612EC/$file/Breitbandstatusbericht.pdf, p. 45 et<br />

seqq.<br />

203<br />

http://www.bmbwk.gv.at<br />

204<br />

http://www.bmvit.gv.at<br />

205<br />

http://www.bmwa.gv.at<br />

206<br />

RTR-GmbH (2003). Breitband<strong>in</strong>itiative 2003: Österreich auf dem Weg zum Spitzenplatz <strong>in</strong> der Informationsgesellschaft (Breitband<br />

Status Report). http://www.rtr.at/web.nsf/lookuid/0808B704869D1DDFC1256E55006612EC/$file/Breitbandstatusbericht.pdf, p. 9


8.4 Belgium<br />

8.4.1 Introduction<br />

Page 149 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Belgium is one of the European leaders <strong>in</strong> the broadband network and services. Broadband coverage is higher<br />

than 98%. Penetration rate is among the best <strong>in</strong> Europe. There are several reasons to this lead<strong>in</strong>g position.<br />

• The small size of the country, the high population density and the ma<strong>in</strong>ly urban topology (about 60%).<br />

• Strong operators <strong>in</strong> cable (Telenet and UPC) and DSL (Belgacom), started off by cable TV operators’<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment to upgrade their networks and provide cable modem services.<br />

• Governmental wishes to enhance the communication between the different communities (Flemish,<br />

French and German) and regions (Flandres, Wallonia, Brussels)<br />

It is particularly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that Belgium has a very high broadband penetration despite a very low PC<br />

ownership.<br />

%<br />

Nombre de PC (1990-2002)<br />

Nombre de PC (en millions)<br />

1990 1995 1998 1999 2000 2001 2001<br />

Évolution<br />

2002/2001<br />

UE15 25,2 56,2 82,7 91,2 105,3 116,9 132,8 +13,6%<br />

PC par<br />

100<br />

habitants<br />

Belgium 0,9 1,8 2,3 2,3 2,4 2,5 +4,2% 24<br />

Denmark 0,6 1,4 2,0 2,2 2,7 2,9 3,1 +6,9% 58<br />

Germany 6,5 15,6 22,9 24,4 27,6 31,3 35,6 +22,8% 43<br />

Greece 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,6 0,8 0,9 0,9 8<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> 1,1 3,5 4,3 4,8 5,8 6,8 7,9 +16,2% 20<br />

France 4,0 7,8 13,6 15,7 17,9 19,5 20,7 +6,2% 35<br />

Ireland 0,3 0,7 1,0 1,2 1,4 1,5 1,7 +10,3% 42<br />

Italy 2,1 4,8 8,0 9,0 10,3 11,3 13,0 +15,0% 23<br />

Luxemburg 0,1 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 59<br />

Netherlands 1,4 3,1 5,1 5,7 6,3 6,9 7,6 +9,5% 47<br />

Austria 0,5 1,3 1,9 2,1 2,3 2,7 3,0 +11,1% 37<br />

Portugal 0,3 0,6 0,8 0,9 1,1 1,2 1,4 +16,2% 13<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land 0,5 1,2 1,8 1,9 2,1 2,2 2,3 +4,5% 44<br />

Sweden 0,6 2,2 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,6 +11,1% 62<br />

United-K<strong>in</strong>gdom 6,2 11,8 15,9 18,0 20,2 22,0 24,0 +9,0% 41<br />

Iceland 0 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,1 45<br />

Norway 0,9 1,2 1,8 2,0 2,2 2,3 2,4 +4,3% 53<br />

United States 54,2 86,3 124,0 141,0 161,0 178,0 190,0 +6,7% 66<br />

Japan 7,4 15,1 30,0 36,3 40,0 45,6 48,7 +6,8% 38<br />

Table 15: PC penetration <strong>in</strong> European countries<br />

(2003: http://www.itu.<strong>in</strong>t/ITU-D/ict/statistics/at_glance/Internet03.pdf)<br />

2002


8.4.2 The broadband market<br />

Page 150 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Broadband access is ma<strong>in</strong>ly provided through the wired networks. The reasons for this are firstly the urban<br />

configuration of the country and secondly the strong competition between cable and the DSL operators. It is<br />

important to realise that 60% of the population have a choice between DSL and cable technologies <strong>in</strong> their area.<br />

The result<strong>in</strong>g market split is 62% for ADSL and 38% for cable networks, which offer more than 3 Mb/s to the<br />

users.<br />

The most important access mode is offered by the DSL networks (86% provided by Belgacom) cover<strong>in</strong>g nearly<br />

all of the country. An important number of <strong>in</strong>dependent Internet Service Providers (ISP) is try<strong>in</strong>g to ga<strong>in</strong> market<br />

shares through the resale of Belgacom DSL products. Belgacom is one of the operators hav<strong>in</strong>g the highest<br />

penetration rate <strong>in</strong> the world (29% at the end of 2003) with an impressive rise of its number of subscribers<br />

(Table 16).<br />

Date <strong>Number</strong> of ADSL connections<br />

End of 2001 230 000<br />

End of 2002 517 000<br />

End of 2003 785 000<br />

End of 2004 > 1 000 000<br />

Table 16: <strong>Number</strong> of ADSL connections<br />

At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2005, the offered services were:<br />

• “ADSL light” at 29.95 € per month (first month for free): 128 kb/s upstream, 512 kb/s downstream.<br />

• “ADSL go” at 39.95 € per month (first month for free): 192 kb/s upstream, 4 Mb/s downstream.<br />

• “ADSL plus” at 54.95 € per month (first month for free): 256 kb/s upstream, 4Mb/s downstream<br />

An important <strong>in</strong>novation was the launch <strong>in</strong> November 2004 of the first VDSL service, available for a monthly<br />

subscription price of 59.95 €, and provid<strong>in</strong>g to the subscribers up to 9 Mb/s downstream and up to 600 kb/s<br />

upstream. Another important <strong>in</strong>novation is a product on the “ADSL Light” model, but as a time-based service<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g to reduce the cost of broadband access.<br />

Although cable networks cover only 64% of the Belgian territory, that rate <strong>in</strong>creases up to 95% <strong>in</strong> Flandres and<br />

Brussels where the cable networks sever almost 100% of the population. The two ma<strong>in</strong> operators are UPC<br />

Belgium and Telenet. S<strong>in</strong>ce the competition between the two cable operators is <strong>in</strong>tensive, the services and<br />

pric<strong>in</strong>g listed below are purely <strong>in</strong>formative.<br />

UPC Belgium <strong>in</strong>creased the speed of its services at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2005. The products are now as listed <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 17. UPC Internet subscribers grow from 28 100 at the end of June 2004 to 29 200 at the end of September<br />

2004.<br />

Chello offers<br />

Downstream<br />

bitrate (kb/s)<br />

Upstream<br />

bitrate (kb/s)<br />

Subscription<br />

(euros per month)<br />

Starter 256 64 14.95<br />

Easy 512 128 24.95<br />

Classic 6000 512 29.95<br />

Plus 10000 768 39.95<br />

Extreme 20000 1000 49.95<br />

Pro 16000 1000 69.95<br />

Table 17: UPC Belgium products


Page 151 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Telenet is the ma<strong>in</strong> broadband Internet, TV and telephony provider <strong>in</strong> the Flemish area, with 55% of the market<br />

shares at the end of December 2002. Telenet subscribers <strong>in</strong>creased from 500 000 <strong>in</strong> October 2004 to 528 000 at<br />

the end of December 2004.<br />

Telenet offers<br />

Downstream<br />

bitrate (kb/s)<br />

Upstream<br />

bitrate (kb/s)<br />

Subscription<br />

(euros per month)<br />

ConfortNet 512 128 29.95<br />

ExpressNet 5000 192 41.95<br />

ExpressNet Plus 6600 512 51.95<br />

ExpressNet Turbo 10000 512 59.95<br />

Table 18: Telenet products<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g wireless services, Telenet offers a WiFi service allow<strong>in</strong>g a free surf <strong>in</strong>side and outside the<br />

subscriber’s home but also through 100 hotspots <strong>in</strong> the major Belgian cities, ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> Flanders. On the other<br />

hand, Belgacom is operat<strong>in</strong>g 313 WiFi hotspots located all over Belgium.<br />

Satellite or Power L<strong>in</strong>e Transmission rema<strong>in</strong> of m<strong>in</strong>or importance. Satellite is ma<strong>in</strong>ly used to download data<br />

when the upstream is done through dial-up or broadband networks. The satellite operators are NetSystem Sat,<br />

NetbySky or SkyDSL operated by Strato AG (Germany)<br />

For the mobile services, the problems are related to the delays <strong>in</strong> the launches of 3G services and the restricted<br />

coverage areas (only 6 Belgian cities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Brussels). Despite prices similar to 2G services, remote Internet<br />

accesses rema<strong>in</strong> limited, but the potential of this k<strong>in</strong>d of services seems to be high due to the good rate of mobile<br />

phone <strong>in</strong> Belgium (84%).<br />

8.4.3 Broadband policy<br />

The objective is to target the 2.5 million households and the 500 000 small and medium enterprises (SME) to be<br />

connected at the end of 2006 by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the number of services and reduc<strong>in</strong>g the prices. This objective is<br />

helped by the governmental wishes to help people to be connected, call<strong>in</strong>g upon operators to put on the market<br />

“light” offers with lower prices and reduced speed as described above with the new services appeared at the<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2005.<br />

Two ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions provide an impulsion to the broadband activities <strong>in</strong> Belgium:<br />

• ISPA (Internet Service Providers Association) BELGIUM is non-profit organisation created to promote<br />

the <strong>in</strong>terests of Belgian companies provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternet services. Its members account for 97% of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternet connections <strong>in</strong> Belgium. ISPA publishes a quarterly market survey on the development of the<br />

Belgian <strong>in</strong>ternet market, and is also active at a regulatory, legislative and technical level on behalf of its<br />

members and of the <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> general.<br />

• BIBA (Belgium Internet Broadband Application) is an <strong>in</strong>itiative started at the end of 2002 by the<br />

Belgian M<strong>in</strong>ister of Telecommunications to foster broadband applications development. The BIBA<br />

platform started <strong>in</strong> August 2002, allow<strong>in</strong>g several <strong>in</strong>dustrial players to launch new services based on<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies with a real market potential and SME oriented. The pilot applications are <strong>in</strong> the<br />

health, security, e-learn<strong>in</strong>g or telework<strong>in</strong>g doma<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

The Belgian government is also th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about a new use of public funds stopp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructures<br />

which are already complete and stimulat<strong>in</strong>g the use of new applications by<br />

• develop<strong>in</strong>g the digitalisation of the federal scientific and cultural heritage.<br />

• encourag<strong>in</strong>g the research and development of broadband applications and tools <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

consumer’s confidence (electronic signature and e-payment)<br />

• develop<strong>in</strong>g a federal portal offer<strong>in</strong>g the first <strong>in</strong>teractive applications such as “tax-on-web” or electronic<br />

ID with direct applications <strong>in</strong> healthcare.<br />

• connect<strong>in</strong>g public adm<strong>in</strong>istrations, schools and hospitals. (I-L<strong>in</strong>e project)<br />

• connect<strong>in</strong>g the SME through the Agoria road show illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the advantages of broadband technology<br />

on the basis of the F<strong>in</strong>nish example.


8.5 Cyprus<br />

8.5.1 Introduction<br />

Page 152 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Cyprus jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has a population of 797.800 (2002) on a territory of 9251<br />

Km 2.<br />

8.5.2 The broadband market<br />

Until recently the only provider of broadband services <strong>in</strong> Cyprus was the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator. After the<br />

liberalisation of electronic communications and services <strong>in</strong> year 2003 several other provides have started to<br />

compete the <strong>in</strong>cumbent at the service level utilis<strong>in</strong>g the Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e Access Multiplexers (DSLAMs)<br />

of the <strong>in</strong>cumbent.<br />

In year 2004 the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator has published its RUO that gave the right to alternative operators to provide<br />

their services through fully unbundled l<strong>in</strong>es and shared access l<strong>in</strong>es. In addition, EAC (Electricity Authority of<br />

Cyprus) has made available its fibre optic network for public use. The company has reached an agreement with<br />

two alternative operators for the use of its <strong>in</strong>frastructure (Cablenet – Primetel).<br />

The fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density stands at 57.73%, while mobile telephony reaches 82.4% of the population. 3G services<br />

will be provided with<strong>in</strong> year 2005. There are 66.463 Internet subscriptions, and 17.994 broadband connections.<br />

The market shares of providers of broadband services are as follows (Percentage of penetration <strong>in</strong> the market<br />

based upon subscriber number (2003)):<br />

• 74 % Cyta<br />

• 13 % Spidernet<br />

• 9 % Logosnet<br />

• 2 % Avacom Net Services<br />

• 2 % Thunderworx.<br />

8.5.3 Broadband policy<br />

Policies and strategic plann<strong>in</strong>g for the broadband market are handled by the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Bureau – M<strong>in</strong>istry of<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ance. It is expected that with<strong>in</strong> year 2005 licenses for the provision of <strong>in</strong>ternet broadband connections by<br />

means of wireless local loop will be issued. It is also expected that <strong>in</strong>ternet broadband connections will be<br />

provided by means of 3G and power l<strong>in</strong>e communications (PLC).<br />

In addition, by the year 2006 OCECPR together with DEC MCW (Department of Electronic Communications –<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Communications and Works) will licence DVB – T (Digital Video Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g – Terrestrial).


8.6 Czech Republic<br />

8.6.1 Introduction<br />

Page 153 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The Czech Republic, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has 10 211 500 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a<br />

territory of 78 866 square km, which means that its population density is 129.4 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The<br />

density is thus broadly <strong>in</strong> the middle of the EU range, although somewhat higher than the average. Purchas<strong>in</strong>gpower<br />

adjusted GDP stood at 70% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.6.2 The broadband market<br />

The Czech Republic has a very high usage of mobile telephony with a penetration rate of approximately 105%,<br />

far above EU average, but a very low number of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, equivalent to only 35.5% 207 of the population, far<br />

below average, and decreas<strong>in</strong>g at a rate comparable to most other member states. While the high figure for<br />

mobiles is unusually high for a new member state, the low figure for fixed l<strong>in</strong>es is a feature it shares with<br />

virtually all the other new member states bar Cyprus and Malta. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is still 99% dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

by the <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom operator Český Telecom 208 , but the mobile telephony market is very competitive.<br />

Český Telecom’s Eurotel subsidiary has a 42% market share, while its T-Mobile has 40.8% and Oskar 17.2% 209 .<br />

The Czech broadband market is expand<strong>in</strong>g after a late start – ADSL has been available from the <strong>in</strong>cumbent only<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce March 2003. Český Telecom now offers ADSL services on approximately 3 million fixed l<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 88% of its customers, but has so far only signed up 100 000 broadband customers 210 . Local<br />

loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g equally started late, only <strong>in</strong> December 2003. Alternative operator Aliatel also offers ADSL <strong>in</strong><br />

all urban areas, but subscription figures are not available. Cable companies had 60 000 broadband customers at<br />

the end of 2004 211 . With 1.2 mio exist<strong>in</strong>g cable TV connections, of which roughly 800,000 are currently used<br />

(UPC 370 000, Karneval 280 000, and the rest by 95 mostly regional operators), they still have large room to<br />

grow <strong>in</strong> broadband, too 212 .<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g mobile broadband, Eurotel has launched a 3G network <strong>in</strong> August 2004 and had 35 000 subscriptions<br />

by the end of 2004, while both T-onl<strong>in</strong>e and Oskar offer GPRS/EDGE services for which subscriber numbers<br />

are not available. Another 40 000 users are us<strong>in</strong>g other technologies 213 , mostly Fixed Wireless Access.<br />

Broadband satellite is equally available 214 . Adjust<strong>in</strong>g for growth of the cable operators <strong>in</strong> the second half, it<br />

should be estimated that there were overall around 230 000 broadband (fixed and mobile) subscriptions <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Czech Republic at 1 January 2005, which translates <strong>in</strong>to a penetration rate of about 2.3%.<br />

8.6.3 Broadband policy<br />

The national broadband access policy: broadband strategy of the Czech republic 215 , which is part of the current<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation society strategy “e-Czech 2006” 216 , sets the objective of 50% of the population us<strong>in</strong>g broadband by<br />

2010. Apart from establish<strong>in</strong>g the conditions for fair competition on the telecommunications market and the<br />

development of e-commerce, it focuses on three roles for the government: the state as a service provider as a<br />

customer, and as a provider of direct support.<br />

As a service provider, the state will focus on the provision of e-government, def<strong>in</strong>ed as allow<strong>in</strong>g citizens to<br />

communicate <strong>in</strong> a simple and fast manner with the state while generate sav<strong>in</strong>gs for the state budget, while also<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g e-health and e-learn<strong>in</strong>g. As a customer, the state should <strong>in</strong>tentionally stimulate market development<br />

and support competition on this same market, particularly by build<strong>in</strong>g up demand. In particular, it <strong>in</strong>tends to<br />

provide all state <strong>in</strong>stitutions with broadband Internet access by 2006.As a provider of direct support, the state<br />

207<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

208<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

209<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

210<br />

Press release Český Telecom: NUMBER OF EXPRESS SUBSCRIBERS EXCEEDS 130 000 (04.01.2005)<br />

211<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

212<br />

The national broadband access policy: broadband strategy of the Czech republic, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Informatics of the Czech Republic, 2005<br />

213<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

214<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf<br />

215<br />

The national broadband access policy: broadband strategy of the Czech republic, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Informatics of the Czech Republic, 2005<br />

216<br />

http://www.micr.cz/dokumenty/default_en.htm


Page 154 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

<strong>in</strong>tends to support networks and local distribution networks <strong>in</strong> less densely populated and less developed regions<br />

<strong>in</strong> the CR.<br />

For this purpose, a "Broadband Development Subsidy <strong>Title</strong>" is foreseen, <strong>in</strong>to which 1% of the proceeds from the<br />

privatisation of Český Telecom will be deposited. The Subsidy <strong>Title</strong> will be used from the 2006 budget onwards<br />

to co-f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong>frastructure projects for metropolitan and local networks, but also to co-f<strong>in</strong>ance projects for<br />

broadband content and services. Contributions may be drawn for costs of both the construction and the first year<br />

of operations. Priority will be given to support for projects which will stimulate demand for broadband access<br />

from different users (e.g. healthcare, education, municipal bodies, commercial entities, etc.) <strong>in</strong> specific areas,<br />

and projects which will provide a higher economic effect of <strong>in</strong>vestment.<br />

8.6.4 Conclusion<br />

Broadband <strong>in</strong> the Czech Republic had a very late start: by July 2004, the Czech Republic was 22 nd <strong>in</strong> the EU,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g significantly beh<strong>in</strong>d most other new member states. Start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2004, penetration has started grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

considerably, probably at least doubl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the second half of the year. From the tim<strong>in</strong>g, it appears that two<br />

factors have caused that take-off: firstly, that the <strong>in</strong>cumbent is now offer<strong>in</strong>g and actively promot<strong>in</strong>g ADSL, and<br />

secondly, that local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g is now available. It would appear <strong>in</strong> particular that retail prices, which were<br />

above EU average, have decreased somewhat, although prices for unbundled local loop and shared access are<br />

still the highest <strong>in</strong> Europe. 217 However, given the very low penetration to start with, it is unclear whether these<br />

developments alone will be sufficient to allow the Czech Republic to catch up with the others – even if it<br />

doubles aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2005, penetration will still be at the bottom of the EU.<br />

217 Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004


8.7 Denmark<br />

8.7.1 Introduction<br />

Page 155 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Chapter 2 discusses different factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the general broadband development <strong>in</strong> Denmark. In chapter 3<br />

selected case studies of alternative broadband development <strong>in</strong> Denmark are presented. The reason for focus<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on alternative networks is that we are witness<strong>in</strong>g potentials for a paradigm shift, where new actors (<strong>in</strong> some<br />

cases the end user) have end to end control of the networks. In some common uses, however, the telecom<br />

operators are kept as backbone providers.<br />

These alternative networks have capabilities of offer<strong>in</strong>g Internet, voice and video services (triple play), which<br />

gives them possibility for compet<strong>in</strong>g with voice service providers and TV access providers. There are however<br />

unsolved problems relat<strong>in</strong>g to efficient organisation and regulation of these platforms. Technology-wise there<br />

are problems related to coverage, capacity, QoS, Security…, and when it comes to regulatory issues there are<br />

problems like universal service with regards to voice services, and with regards to TV services, there are a<br />

number of challenges like copyright, ‘must carry’, etc. known from the multi channel TV regulation. Also the<br />

market organisation and bus<strong>in</strong>ess models will have vital <strong>in</strong>fluence on the future of these platforms.<br />

In this report through detailed case studies a number of these parameters are addressed. The analysis tries to<br />

identify the drivers and barriers of the development of alternative networks based on follow<strong>in</strong>g parameters:<br />

• The deployed technology and the technological capabilities<br />

• The offered services<br />

• The structure and architecture of networks<br />

• The organisation and ownership structure<br />

• The deployed bus<strong>in</strong>ess model and fund<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the role of government<br />

8.7.2 The broadband market<br />

8.7.2.1 Supply<br />

In Denmark there are more than five million <strong>in</strong>habitants and more than 2.4 million households. Broadband<br />

services are available for 98% of the population (98% of Households can access a broadband connection of<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum 512 Kbps and 95% can access a m<strong>in</strong>imum 2 Mbps). Unlike the EU regulation framework, the Danish<br />

service obligation <strong>in</strong>cludes ISDN and 2MB l<strong>in</strong>es. It has been discussed to <strong>in</strong>clude broadband services <strong>in</strong> the<br />

universal service obligation imposed on the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator, but when it turned out that broadband already<br />

was available to the vast majority of the population it was considered to be an unnecessary regulatory<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention.<br />

Broadband via DSL is offered by a number of operators. However, the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator TDC has a market<br />

share of 79%. On top of this the other operators depend to a large extent on the TDC access network to reach<br />

their customers either by raw copper or bit stream access agreements. When DSL services were <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong><br />

Denmark, the three operators TDC, Cybercity and Tiscali had equal market shares. But s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000, TDC has<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>ed the majority of the new (ma<strong>in</strong>ly residential) customers. The competitors have accused TDC for unfair<br />

competition, as TDC has demanded large fees on top of the <strong>in</strong>terconnection charge to get access to their<br />

network. But this has not yet led to any <strong>in</strong>tervention from the IT- and Telecom Agency or the Competition<br />

Board.<br />

Also competition <strong>in</strong> cable networks is limited, with two major operators e.g. TDC and Telia. It is clearly TELIA<br />

that have taken the lead <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of cable services <strong>in</strong> Denmark. TDC was very reluctant to go <strong>in</strong>to this<br />

market as they preferred to offer ISDN and DSL services to their customers.<br />

Prices for broadband have rema<strong>in</strong>ed rather high <strong>in</strong> Denmark compared with the bandwidth offered. This has<br />

stimulated the creation of a number of alternative providers such as neighbourhood organisations that have set<br />

up their own networks either based on exist<strong>in</strong>g cable <strong>in</strong>frastructures or WLAN. Also, power companies are<br />

active <strong>in</strong> this area. They are roll<strong>in</strong>g out optical fibres to a large number of households, and will thereby be able<br />

to offer an alternative to the access network of TDC.


Page 156 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

12/02 06/03 12/03 06/04<br />

DSL coverage (% of population) 95% 95% 95%<br />

DSL subscribers 307.000 390.693 473.481 562.112<br />

DSL penetration (% of population) 5,7% 7,2% 8,8% 10,4%<br />

Cable modem coverage (% population)<br />

Cable modem subscribers 133.548 177.304 243.602 297.155<br />

Cable modem penetration (% population) 2,5% 3,3% 4,5% 5,5%<br />

FTTH subscribers na 35.000 42.400 86.142<br />

PLC subscribers 0 0 0 0<br />

WLL subscribers 1.485 1.760 2.332 3.019<br />

Satellite subscribers 0 0 0<br />

Total 442.033 604.757 761.815 948.428<br />

Total penetration (% population) 8,2% 11,2% 14,1% 17,6%<br />

Table 19: Overview of broadband services <strong>in</strong> Denmark<br />

Although the Danish telecom market is considered to be one of the most liberal and competitive markets,<br />

competition on the market for broadband services still needs to be developed. This is properly one of the reasons<br />

for a rather slow take-up for high bandwidth DSL services. TDC has through efficient market<strong>in</strong>g been able to<br />

provide a high penetration of DSL services, but lacks the <strong>in</strong>centive to <strong>in</strong>crease the bandwidth offered. As long as<br />

the competitive pressure is limited, offer<strong>in</strong>g of higher bandwidth will add to the costs, but will not create more<br />

customers.<br />

8.7.2.2 Demand<br />

The Danish market has, like the markets <strong>in</strong> the other Nordic countries, a high penetration of most k<strong>in</strong>ds of<br />

telecom services. This has been expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that the major share of the population is able to afford<br />

these services. In addition, Danish consumers and enterprises are among the fastest to take up new technology.<br />

Denmark has one of the highest penetration rates of fixed phone l<strong>in</strong>es although the penetration rate has been<br />

fall<strong>in</strong>g from 72 <strong>in</strong> 2001 to about 67 l<strong>in</strong>es per 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong> 2003 218 . This is partly due to a substitution by<br />

mobile phones as the penetration rate of mobile phones has <strong>in</strong>creased from 74 to 89 with<strong>in</strong> the same period. The<br />

Nordic countries were among the first to <strong>in</strong>troduce mobile telephones and used to have the highest penetration.<br />

However, their lead has decreased <strong>in</strong> the past couple of years, and a number of countries both <strong>in</strong>side and outside<br />

Europe have reached the same high level of penetration.<br />

Also, with regard to broadband and Internet services, Denmark has been among the lead<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

and it still ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s one the highest penetration rates <strong>in</strong> Internet access as well as penetration of ADSL and<br />

cable modem. The aggregate penetration of broadband services were <strong>in</strong> 2003 14.1 connections per 100<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants. Two thirds of the connections were based on ADSL technology, about 25% on cable modem and<br />

about 5% on fiber to the home (www.itst.dk). It should however be noted that more than half of the connections<br />

supply a bandwidth below 144 kbps downstream, which is below some def<strong>in</strong>itions of broadband, and certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

far below what is offered <strong>in</strong> e.g. South Korea.<br />

Several comparisons position Denmark as an advanced market for ICT products <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> the mobile<br />

areas. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to a benchmark<strong>in</strong>g analysis measur<strong>in</strong>g 26 parameters with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure, applications and<br />

market structure, Denmark is the most advanced ICT market next to Hong Kong and ahead of other<br />

218 ITST: Telecom Statistics various years http://www.itst.dk


Page 157 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Scand<strong>in</strong>avian and European countries (ITU 2002). In a similar benchmark on ‘e-read<strong>in</strong>ess’ made by INSEAD,<br />

Denmark ranks as number eight after both Sweden and the UK (Dutta and Ja<strong>in</strong> 2002).<br />

Seen from the demand side, the Danish po<strong>in</strong>t of departure for be<strong>in</strong>g among the lead<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

broadband penetration is rather good. The Danish market is usually very quick to take up new technologies and<br />

a high and evenly distributed <strong>in</strong>come implies that a high penetration can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed for most consumer services.<br />

In addition to this, Denmark already has a high penetration of PCs and Internet connections. The Danish<br />

Government has been very active to develop e-Government services, which also has contributed to the demand.<br />

8.7.3 Broadband policy<br />

Denmark has s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid 90s followed a deliberate policy of stimulat<strong>in</strong>g competition on the telecom market,<br />

and the Danish market is considered to be one of the most competitive with<strong>in</strong> the EU with fierce competition <strong>in</strong><br />

particular on the market for mobile services. Denmark was also among the first countries to demand unbundl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the local loop. In contrast to most other EU countries unbundl<strong>in</strong>g is also demanded for optical networks.<br />

Denmark has <strong>in</strong>troduced a special taxation scheme, which enables employers to offer PCs as well as broadband<br />

connections to their employees as a tax free benefit. Consider<strong>in</strong>g the high levels of <strong>in</strong>come taxes <strong>in</strong> Denmark,<br />

this implies that tax reductions <strong>in</strong> reality pay more than 50% of the costs. This scheme has become very popular<br />

and many companies provide this opportunity to all of their employees as part of their salary.<br />

8.7.3.1 Case studies<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g four detailed case studies on alternative networks <strong>in</strong> the Danish market are given. Later some<br />

brief case descriptions of <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>in</strong>itiatives are outl<strong>in</strong>ed. The four cases are chosen such that it becomes<br />

possible to analyze the parameters we have outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this report. The first case is a City network, case number<br />

two is a community network, case number three is a power company provided network and the last case is an<br />

operator driven network with a large municipality as a big customer.<br />

Today the number of broadband subscribers <strong>in</strong> Denmark exceeds one million and the share of alternative<br />

networks is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rapidly. The follow<strong>in</strong>g cases give an <strong>in</strong>dication of the variety of network <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong><br />

spread<strong>in</strong>g out the broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructures and services <strong>in</strong> Denmark.<br />

8.7.3.1.1 Case study 1: (City network) Frederiksberg net<br />

Freaderiksberg Net (FrbNet) is a ‘non profit’ community network serv<strong>in</strong>g residents <strong>in</strong> a part of Copenhagen,<br />

called the Frederiksberg commune. The company was founded by two entrepreneurs <strong>in</strong> 2000 follow<strong>in</strong>g a civil<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g and established with private and bank loans. The company is operated as a partnership organization<br />

where all members of the network own an equal share <strong>in</strong> the company. Independently of the commune, but as<br />

customer of some of the services offered by the commune (such as bill<strong>in</strong>g and passive <strong>in</strong>frastructure), it has a<br />

customer base of 20 000.<br />

The company has only five employees and uses simple bus<strong>in</strong>ess models (such as flat rate charges rather than<br />

usage measured) and outsources as many tasks as possible (bill<strong>in</strong>g, PSTN <strong>in</strong>terconnectivity and term<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

fibre <strong>in</strong>stallation and deployment etc.). The company thus has a relatively simple <strong>in</strong>-house operation and<br />

overhead but a more complex relation to subcontractors.<br />

FrbNet uses a FTTB solution to connect build<strong>in</strong>gs to their own Ethernet backbone network. The backbone<br />

network is build up gradually based on requests from build<strong>in</strong>g complexes. For deploy<strong>in</strong>g the fibre, the company<br />

buys access to an already established underground tube <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> Frederiksberg owned and operated by<br />

the local fire department219 . FrbNet thus owns and operates the fibre cables but pays a distance related fee for<br />

deployment and a distance related yearly fee.<br />

Upon connectivity, FrbNet <strong>in</strong>stalls their own router, switch and ATA (analogue telephone adaptor), but build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

complexes (condom<strong>in</strong>ium) need to rewire all apartments with two sets of eight strand UTP cables themselves.<br />

No equipment is needed <strong>in</strong>side apartments as one cable provides LAN connectivity and 2-4 strands of the other<br />

are used for POT services. At his time the company does not offer video or television services.<br />

The pric<strong>in</strong>g structure is based on flat-rate subscriptions to users depend<strong>in</strong>g on bandwidth. The current fees are<br />

monthly fees of € 13 for 1 Mbps, € 20 for 2 Mbps, and € 36 for 10 Mbps. The VoIP is offered for a flat rate of €<br />

219 These special circumstances arise from an over 20 year old <strong>in</strong>itiative by the Frederiksberg fire department to directly connect all<br />

apartments <strong>in</strong> the area with an automatic fire alarm to the fire department headquarters. Today, the fire department openly sells access to<br />

this <strong>in</strong>frastructure.


Page 158 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

20, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g unlimited fixed l<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>utes. When bundled with <strong>in</strong>ternet subscription, VoIP and 2 Mbps are<br />

offered with a € 3 discount, and VoIP and 10 Mbps with € 10 discount.<br />

FrbNet uses an immature ‘gated garden’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess model where the company <strong>in</strong> the lack of external service<br />

providers has implemented both Internet provision and a telephone service <strong>in</strong>-house. Technical solutions are<br />

based around standardized pure Ethernet equipment which they consider as one of their success criteria. The<br />

VoIP service is based on the Asterisk, open source L<strong>in</strong>ux PBX. PSTN <strong>in</strong>terconnectivity is provided through a<br />

telephone wholesale contract where FrbNet also gets number series to offer their customers.<br />

With an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g customer base, the company hopes to attract external multimedia service providers both to<br />

replace the exist<strong>in</strong>g telephone service as well as to <strong>in</strong>troduce new VoD and IPTV services. However, before<br />

video services can be offered organizational decisions about bus<strong>in</strong>ess models and bill<strong>in</strong>g solutions need to be<br />

taken. The company regards <strong>in</strong>troduction of video services as the most difficult future task due to the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

challenges and barriers:<br />

• Cabl<strong>in</strong>g: Access price to <strong>in</strong>cumbent owned coaxial cables from basement to apartments is used as a<br />

barrier by the <strong>in</strong>cumbent.<br />

• Content: The cost of content is too high for a small customer base like FrbNet.<br />

• Standardization: There is a lack of standardisation both <strong>in</strong> encod<strong>in</strong>g (MPEG, WMF, HighDef) as well<br />

as <strong>in</strong> set-top boxes.<br />

• Plann<strong>in</strong>g and organization: The addition of VoD and IPTV changes the structure of the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

systems, i.e. transmission pric<strong>in</strong>g and bill<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Vendor relation: Content owners want to establish direct relationship with viewers <strong>in</strong>stead of through<br />

FrbNet.<br />

• Distribution: Distribution is more of a technical challenge (rather than barrier) but can be solved (the<br />

network supports it)<br />

• Demand: FrbNet feels that customers are not look<strong>in</strong>g for (there is not demand) for alternative television<br />

services. The demand is for cheap Internet and telephone.<br />

On the future horizon, FrbNet see improved service quality rather than price reductions. This could e.g. be <strong>in</strong> the<br />

form of fibre cables from basement to apartments and <strong>in</strong>troduction of VoD and IPTV services.<br />

Conclusion<br />

FrbNet is a ‘non-profit’ city network that due to <strong>in</strong>expensive standardized equipment and access to exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

public <strong>in</strong>frastructure and services (lowered entry barrier) can offer cheap IP services. The company has limited<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources and <strong>in</strong>vestment and operational cost is kept at a m<strong>in</strong>imum through steady growth, small<br />

overhead and outsourc<strong>in</strong>g. The company uses an immature ‘gated garden’ model to offer Internet and telephone<br />

services over a converged Ethernet FTTB <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Driven by aggregated demand from build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

complexes (condom<strong>in</strong>ium) the company faces cont<strong>in</strong>uous f<strong>in</strong>ancial and organizational challenges.<br />

8.7.3.1.2 Case study 2: (Community Network) DjurslandS.Net<br />

DjurslandS.net is a non-profit community network <strong>in</strong> the rural area of Djursland. The company stems from a<br />

grass-root movement ‘Boevl’ that through support from the local commune has been arrang<strong>in</strong>g voluntary<br />

computer teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the community s<strong>in</strong>ce 1992. Today the company has evolved <strong>in</strong>to an umbrella organisation<br />

for eight local community wireless networks. The goal of the company is to avoid an ongo<strong>in</strong>g social regression<br />

<strong>in</strong> the region by provid<strong>in</strong>g affordable high-speed <strong>in</strong>ternet access to all residents of the region.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the plann<strong>in</strong>g phase of 2000-2002, the company first tried to gather a critical mass of potential customers<br />

<strong>in</strong> the region to strengthen barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g power aga<strong>in</strong>st commercial operators. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce 25% of the 32.000<br />

households (population of 82.000) <strong>in</strong> the region are outside the reach of traditional DSL and cable, none of the<br />

commercial operators could meet the goals of the company. The company therefore started test<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

evaluat<strong>in</strong>g wireless and satellite access and concluded that wireless access was superior due to the high<br />

transmission delay <strong>in</strong> satellite technology.<br />

In 2002 the company got an EU grant to partly f<strong>in</strong>ance the build-up and operation of their own wireless access<br />

network based on the 802.11b standard. Be<strong>in</strong>g a non-profit community organisation the company had troubles<br />

rais<strong>in</strong>g the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment capital and therefore the decision was taken to divide the company <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

eight local community networks that it now is composed of, each responsible for fund<strong>in</strong>g their own access<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts. For backbone connectivity, the company relies on a mix of an exist<strong>in</strong>g public regional fibre network<br />

(carrier’s carrier model) and ADSL connections to <strong>in</strong>terconnect its current 150 access po<strong>in</strong>ts.


Page 159 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The operation is based on standardised equipment and open source software where available and the ‘do-ityourself’<br />

paradigm (e.g. to m<strong>in</strong>imise cost the company assembles it own access po<strong>in</strong>ts and antennas). For<br />

operation, the company gets <strong>in</strong>direct support from the regional government through shar<strong>in</strong>g of its 10 employees<br />

and hous<strong>in</strong>g (e.g. the offices are <strong>in</strong> the basement of the local gymnasium), and relies on local voluntary work.<br />

To subscribe, users with<strong>in</strong> 1,5 Km of an access po<strong>in</strong>t can buy a standard package <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an outdoor<br />

mountable amplify<strong>in</strong>g receiver for € 265 or users with<strong>in</strong> 5 Km can buy an extended package witch also <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

an extra outdoor antenna. The company offers a flat rate monthly subscription fee of € 13,50 for a 1-6 Mbps<br />

shared duplex bandwidth (multiplex<strong>in</strong>g of up to 20-30 users). In yearend 2004, DjurslandS.Net had 2.200<br />

customers mak<strong>in</strong>g them the largest non-commercial wireless network <strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />

The company adopts a simple mix of ‘public garden’ and ‘walled garden’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess model based on provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Internet access and encourage users to use the connection as much as widely as possible. To provide the required<br />

data services, the company however bundles e-mail, homepage etc. <strong>in</strong>to the subscription fee.<br />

As a future development, the company is <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g adoption of new wireless standards such as 802.11a and<br />

g and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g VoIP. However, there are no concrete plans for upgrad<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>frastructure or<br />

add<strong>in</strong>g new services such as voice or video. This can both be contributed to the technical limitations of wireless<br />

networks but also to the competitive situation with other traditional technologies such as PSTN and terrestrial<br />

television.<br />

When asked about the community support and devotion and the commercial viability of the project and the<br />

founder of the company po<strong>in</strong>ts out that the characteristics of rural areas <strong>in</strong> the form of solidarity, responsibility<br />

and common ‘do-it-yourself’ mentality. Operators don’t see a commercial basis <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g the demand of the<br />

rural areas and therefore, as a last resort, necessity and vision drives the users to start a common <strong>in</strong>itiative. The<br />

solution then becomes different from the commercial strategy, not only <strong>in</strong> terms of profitability but also on the<br />

social level as the community network is not based on hir<strong>in</strong>g professionals for all task but based on us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

available resources and build up competences <strong>in</strong> the community.<br />

Conclusion<br />

DjurslandS.Net is a ‘non-profit’ rural community network that due to unmet demand for broadband connectivity<br />

<strong>in</strong> regions outside the reach of traditional technologies and f<strong>in</strong>ancial support from EU has implemented a<br />

wireless <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The company has limited f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources and m<strong>in</strong>imizes <strong>in</strong>vestment and operational<br />

cost e.g. through access to a public backbone network, voluntary work, and <strong>in</strong>direct support from the commune.<br />

The company adopts a simple mix of ‘public garden’ and ‘walled garden’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess model to provide<br />

<strong>in</strong>expensive <strong>in</strong>ternet access. Driven by local support and solidarity the company faces cont<strong>in</strong>uous f<strong>in</strong>ancial and<br />

organizational challenges.<br />

8.7.3.1.3 Case Study 3: (Energy Utility) NESA<br />

NESA A/S is energy utility company operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of Copenhagen. The company has its core<br />

activities of electricity distribution and trade and is the biggest electricity provider <strong>in</strong> Denmark with 535.000<br />

customers. For the past 15 years the company has been deploy<strong>in</strong>g fiber cables to support its core activities, e.g.<br />

through an IP based control system for their electricity <strong>in</strong>stallations, and now owns more than 25.000 Km of<br />

fibers and more than 700 Km of fiber traces.<br />

In 2002 the company diversified <strong>in</strong>to the broadband market and started implement<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g a FTTH<br />

network. In yearend 2004 the company had 800 active homes participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a commercial pilot project. The<br />

deployment strategy of the company is to lay down empty micro duct tubes with power cables, for subsequent<br />

blow<strong>in</strong>g of fiber. The company has already connected 20.000 homes with tubes and <strong>in</strong>tends to lay tubes to<br />

200.000 homes <strong>in</strong> the next 5-7 years. The company has not yet taken decision about fiber roll-out <strong>in</strong> the tubes<br />

and accord<strong>in</strong>g to them there is a need for political support <strong>in</strong> role-out of fiber <strong>in</strong>frastructure, as they phrase it:<br />

“all important <strong>in</strong>frastructure projects require political support”.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to NESA there are several important synergies between electricity supply and fiber optic<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure supply: a) common network plann<strong>in</strong>g, b) Common digg<strong>in</strong>g projects, c) Common network control<br />

and monitor<strong>in</strong>g, and d) common service organization. The cost of the fiber cable itself is m<strong>in</strong>or <strong>in</strong> relation to the<br />

groundwork and as NESA phrases it: “It should be illegal not to establish fiber connections to the household<br />

when a digg<strong>in</strong>g project is ongo<strong>in</strong>g”.<br />

To build up the FTTH network, NESA contracted IBM Denmark as system <strong>in</strong>tegrator for the project us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

technical solution from Cisco and PacketFront. The network is based on a MPLS backbone network from Cisco,<br />

connect<strong>in</strong>g islands of up to 24 homes with an active switch <strong>in</strong> a curb us<strong>in</strong>g a star topology. Inside the homes,<br />

NESA <strong>in</strong>stalls customer premises equipment (CPE) that term<strong>in</strong>ates the fiber. From the CPE, users are self<br />

responsible for <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g POT or Ethernet cables to their devices.


Page 160 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

NESA’s bus<strong>in</strong>ess model: NESA provides an operator <strong>in</strong>dependent network, where different service providers<br />

can access the households through NESA network and NESA owns, controls and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s the broadband<br />

network and physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Today there are five service providers compet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> four service types (see<br />

Figure 51).<br />

Figure 51: Service Providers <strong>in</strong> NESA’s FTTH network<br />

In the current pilot project, customers pay a fixed monthly fee of € 50 for access to the <strong>in</strong>frastructure and then<br />

buy services directly from service providers through a web portal.<br />

In this approach there is no profit shar<strong>in</strong>g or transportation fee for service providers and NESA covers all<br />

expenses (and profit) from the customer connectivity fee (public garden model). However, the specifics of the<br />

future bus<strong>in</strong>ess model are under development and as a part of that, NESA is consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transportation fees for service providers. With this transportation fee, NESA hopes to reduce the customer fee,<br />

which otherwise can be a barrier to attract<strong>in</strong>g new customers, and to better represent the real transportation cost<br />

of different services’ requirements.<br />

NESA believes very strongly <strong>in</strong> the ‘open access’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess structure and see that as their ma<strong>in</strong> success criteria <strong>in</strong><br />

competition with traditional operators and over for other FTTH projects. They adopt a rather dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

service and <strong>in</strong>frastructure approach, by not provid<strong>in</strong>g any additional services or functions that have to do with<br />

the services themselves, e.g. not provid<strong>in</strong>g set-top boxes, bill<strong>in</strong>g nor product support. They believe that<br />

distanc<strong>in</strong>g themselves from service providers is the only way to ensure fair competition.<br />

When <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g future services, NESA does not encounter technical limitations but regard standardization as<br />

barrier to the development, especially <strong>in</strong> set-top boxes. The company has successfully implemented TV and<br />

VoD services but misses a service that is unique to the FTTH platform.<br />

Conclusion<br />

NESA A/S is an Energy Utility Company that due to synergies with its core activities and strong f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

situation is plann<strong>in</strong>g to establish a FTTH <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The company uses an ‘open-access’ model where NESA<br />

operates and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s the broadband network and physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure and <strong>in</strong>dependent service providers<br />

compete for customers through a portal. Driven by operational synergies and new market potentials the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

barrier to full-scale deployment is ensur<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial susta<strong>in</strong>ability.<br />

8.7.3.2 Case study 4: (Operator Driven) AarhusNet<br />

NetDesign A/S is, as the name implies, primarily <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> design and consultancy of <strong>in</strong>ternal and external<br />

data networks for Danish enterprises. In 2003 the company diversified after w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g an outsourc<strong>in</strong>g agreement<br />

with Aarhus Municipality for establishment and operation of a new backbone network for all public <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Aarhus region, the second largest city of Denmark. NetDesign was granted an exclusive eight year<br />

contract that guarantied the critical mass required to build up a multifunctional regional backbone <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

that the company has designed to further meet the needs of bus<strong>in</strong>esses and eventually residential users.<br />

The network is MPLS based and structured as a number of redundant r<strong>in</strong>gs that provide a total of 58 active<br />

Po<strong>in</strong>ts of Presence (PoP) with 1 Gbps connectivity. In addition 22 Local Exchanges are connected from where<br />

the company provides 1380 locations with 2,3 Mbps G.SHDSL connectivity. The goal of the design was to limit<br />

the distance from PoPs to <strong>in</strong>stitutes and enterprises <strong>in</strong> the area, m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g deployment cost for new customers<br />

and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness.<br />

NetDesign operates the network on the ‘open access’ pr<strong>in</strong>ciples where <strong>in</strong>dependent service providers are granted<br />

access to customers on competitive basis. The network met public critique from compet<strong>in</strong>g traditional operators,<br />

such as the <strong>in</strong>cumbent TDC that meant that provid<strong>in</strong>g services over the AarhusNet rather than their own,<br />

<strong>in</strong>curred extra cost and skewed competition. In yearend 2004, the Danish <strong>in</strong>cumbent acquired 98% of the


Page 161 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

company which now is operated as a subsidiary of the Danish <strong>in</strong>cumbent TDC, us<strong>in</strong>g the same operational<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciples.<br />

To reach the residential market, NetDesign looks towards cooperation with the local Energy Utility Companies<br />

(EUC) to deploy fiber from their PoPs to <strong>in</strong>dividual users. Their view is that public organizations such as EUCs<br />

are the only <strong>in</strong>vestor with long enough time horizon and Rate of Interest (ROI) to see f<strong>in</strong>ancial susta<strong>in</strong>ability <strong>in</strong><br />

FTTH platforms. NetDesign is confident that their competences <strong>in</strong> design and operation of technically advanced<br />

backbone networks make them an attractive partner for the EUCs.<br />

On a competitive level, NetDesign considers their established <strong>in</strong>frastructure and their critical mass of customers<br />

to guard them aga<strong>in</strong>st compet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure establishment, as long as they ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the ‘open access’<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess model. Their future focus is on FTTH rather than advanced DSL as regulation only grants them access<br />

to <strong>in</strong>cumbent Local Exchanges but not street cab<strong>in</strong>ets that are required for short range DSL technologies such as<br />

VDSL.<br />

NetDesign has the technical platform to guarantee Quality of Service (QoS), negotiate and report Service Level<br />

Agreements (SLA). How this platform will be used to implement the details of the ‘open access’ bus<strong>in</strong>ess model<br />

is not determ<strong>in</strong>ed, but <strong>in</strong> general, NetDesign wants to distance themselves from all aspects of service<br />

development and implementation. They therefore identify problems such as standardization <strong>in</strong> IPTV and set-top<br />

boxes as a potential barrier to the development of multimedia services <strong>in</strong> their network but position the problem<br />

with<strong>in</strong> service providers.<br />

Risk Level<br />

High<br />

Low<br />

CONTENT<br />

ISPs TV SP xSPs<br />

Active <strong>in</strong>fra-<br />

operator 1<br />

Active <strong>in</strong>fra-<br />

operator 1<br />

Passive local <strong>in</strong>frastructure company<br />

Figure 52: Expected ROI for different levels of the value cha<strong>in</strong> [Chlamtac, 2005]<br />

NetDesign feels that by provid<strong>in</strong>g the critical mass through public-private partnerships, the public is the driver<br />

for broadband deployment <strong>in</strong> Denmark. Furthermore, they believe that the ROI will def<strong>in</strong>e the future of the<br />

broadband market accord<strong>in</strong>g to Figure 52.<br />

Conclusion<br />

AarhusNet is an operator owned and operated regional backbone network established through a public-private<br />

partnership between NetDesign and Aarhus Muicipality. The network was designed to be extended to the<br />

enterprises and residential market. The network is currently operated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the ‘open-access’ paradigm<br />

on the public and enterprise market and wishes to diversify to the residential market. Driven by a critical mass<br />

provided by the regional government the ma<strong>in</strong> barrier to residential deployment is partnership with local FTTH<br />

projects.<br />

ROI<br />

2-3 years<br />

5 years<br />

20 years


8.7.4 Conclusion<br />

Page 162 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

There are structural and technical limitations connected to the development of traditional broadband. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />

limitations are that these developments are carried out primarily with<strong>in</strong> the traditional telecom paradigm with its<br />

already listed limitations. Even though these networks are opened up to the competitors through <strong>in</strong>terconnection<br />

legislations, the structural barriers still exist and are directly connected to the ownership of physical<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure. The technical limitation is connected to the capabilities of the ‘old’ telecom and cable TV access<br />

networks to offer real broadband services. This ‘path dependent’ limitation will, at best, facilitate a development<br />

of <strong>in</strong>cremental <strong>in</strong>novations <strong>in</strong> the network. The radical changes and <strong>in</strong>novations seem to come from another side,<br />

namely development of ‘alternative networks’.<br />

The alternative networks’ development is characterized by a converged IP platform that is used to offer different<br />

types of content <strong>in</strong> an affordable and/or efficient way by:<br />

• Establishment of LAN <strong>in</strong> residential areas us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure and<br />

establishment of new cables and network components.<br />

• Extension of LAN technology to MAN and WAN, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> bypass<strong>in</strong>g traditional telecom<br />

• Establishment of wireless IP based network <strong>in</strong> residential and work environments us<strong>in</strong>g, e.g., WLAN<br />

• Establishment of wireless hot spots <strong>in</strong> pubic and private places<br />

• Establishment of wireless network <strong>in</strong> larger geographical places<br />

Through an empirical study of the Danish alternative broadband market this report can conclude that two ma<strong>in</strong><br />

factors have acted as drivers <strong>in</strong> the establishment of alternative broadband operators: lower barriers to entry due<br />

to <strong>in</strong>expensive standardized equipment and technologies, and direct or <strong>in</strong>direct form for public sector<br />

<strong>in</strong>volvement<br />

Furthermore, the <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>in</strong>dicated that alternative broadband operators, opposed to the traditional broadband<br />

market, are lead<strong>in</strong>g a trend from closed <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>frastructure and service systems us<strong>in</strong>g closed value-cha<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

towards more open, dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated and standardized networks us<strong>in</strong>g operator <strong>in</strong>dependent bus<strong>in</strong>ess models, where<br />

compet<strong>in</strong>g service providers can offer content and services on a common delivery platform.<br />

The study has also revealed that technical problems with implement<strong>in</strong>g advanced services weigh less on<br />

alternative broadband operators’ scales today, than structural, organization and f<strong>in</strong>ancial concerns. Commonly,<br />

most operators po<strong>in</strong>ted out that video and television services over converged IP networks was the biggest future<br />

barrier to their service portfolio, ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to the lack of standardization <strong>in</strong> encod<strong>in</strong>g, digital rights<br />

management and set-top boxes. All operators were positively expect<strong>in</strong>g resolution to these problems with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

next two years.


8.8 Estonia<br />

8.8.1 Introduction<br />

Page 163 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Estonia, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has 1 350 600 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of 45<br />

215 square km, which means that its population density is 30 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is thus at<br />

the lower end of the EU rang. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 50.4% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.8.2 The broadband market<br />

Estonia has an average usage of mobile telephony with a penetration rate of around 93%, somewhat above EU<br />

average. It has a low density of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, equivalent to only 34.2% 220 of the population, but this is with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

average of the new member states and significantly higher than the other two Baltic states. However, the fixedl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

density has recently decreased. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is open to competition, but still dom<strong>in</strong>ated by Elion<br />

(brandname of Eesti Telekom) with a share of over 80% of telecom services 221 . The mobile telephony market is<br />

competitive. Eesti Telekom’s EMT has a 46.6% market share, while Tele2 has 35.6% and Radiol<strong>in</strong>ja 17.9% 222 .<br />

The Estonian broadband market cont<strong>in</strong>ues its rapid expansion from an already high level. Penetration as<br />

measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per population stood at 10.2% at the end of 2004, as compared to 7.6% six<br />

month earlier. In percentage terms, this represents an impressive 35% growth from 103 000 to 139 000 <strong>in</strong> just<br />

half a year. Of that total, 68 000 are DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 49.4%, down from 53.6% at the end of June. 31.2%<br />

of the broadband connections are through the cable network, while 19.4% use other <strong>in</strong>frastructures. The DSL<br />

market is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly controlled by Elion and its subsidiaries, which account directly for 94.3% of DSL<br />

subscriptions. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 5.7% are unbundled DSL access l<strong>in</strong>es; no l<strong>in</strong>es are retailed on its <strong>in</strong>frastructure by<br />

other ISPs. 223 It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that the fast start of broadband <strong>in</strong> Estonia took place while digitalisation of<br />

the fixed network was still lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d; <strong>in</strong> June 2003 only 82% of the network was digitised, yet broadband<br />

had already taken off.<br />

For the further roll-out of broadband there is, on the positive side, the cable network of Starman, the major<br />

provider of cable TV and Internet connections, which passes nearly 200,000 households or almost one third of<br />

Estonian homes 224 , thus provid<strong>in</strong>g potential for further <strong>in</strong>frastructure-based competition for a significant m<strong>in</strong>ority<br />

of the population. On the negative side, the low population density comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the low <strong>in</strong>come level means<br />

that rural areas’ access to <strong>in</strong>frastructure rema<strong>in</strong>s limited. Only 23% of households <strong>in</strong> rural areas (up to 2 000<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants) have fixed l<strong>in</strong>es 225 , which clearly <strong>in</strong>hibits DSL roll-out.<br />

There was no 3G network operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Estonia at the start of 2005, but two of the three operators were provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

GPRS services.<br />

8.8.3 Broadband policy<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation society <strong>in</strong> general, Estonia is <strong>in</strong> a different situation from most of the new member<br />

states. Internet take-up and broadband roll-out has been extremely fast for a country of its <strong>in</strong>come group, at least<br />

part of which is due to strong policy support. The state has taken the lead <strong>in</strong> offer<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e services by rapidly<br />

deploy<strong>in</strong>g e-government services: for example, <strong>in</strong> 2004 (<strong>in</strong>come year 2003), 59% of natural persons’ <strong>in</strong>come<br />

declarations were declared electronically. E-government services are mostly based on the PeaTee (EEBone)<br />

broadband network of data communication between government, to which more than 21 000 computers and<br />

more than 1300 governmental and local <strong>in</strong>stitutions are connected. Onl<strong>in</strong>e services offered by companies are<br />

equally successful, at least <strong>in</strong> some sectors: 95% of bank<strong>in</strong>g operations are carried out electronically with the<br />

number of Internet bank clients amount<strong>in</strong>g to nearly 800,000 (out of a total population of 1 350 000) 226 .<br />

Even so, the further development of e-government services is a key element of the current overall <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

society strategy, together with e-learn<strong>in</strong>g and research, and e-health. A function<strong>in</strong>g eVot<strong>in</strong>g system is planned to<br />

220<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

221<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

222<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

223<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

224<br />

http://www.ria.ee/atp/<br />

225<br />

Central and Eastern Europe Information Society Benchmarks, Country Analysis, September 2004, EU Commission<br />

226 http://www.ria.ee/atp/


Page 164 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

operate <strong>in</strong> the local government elections <strong>in</strong> 2005 227 . In addition, concern<strong>in</strong>g network roll-out, Estonia has very<br />

recently adopted a national strategy for develop<strong>in</strong>g broadband Internet access that sets out basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples until<br />

2007. It aims <strong>in</strong> particular to br<strong>in</strong>g high-speed Internet access to all regions. Construction of networks will not<br />

be subsidized significantly, but the possibility to do it is provided for, as far as pilot projects are concerned. The<br />

m<strong>in</strong>istry is prepar<strong>in</strong>g for a tender later this year to f<strong>in</strong>d a service provider 228 .<br />

8.8.4 Conclusion<br />

Estonia’s challenges <strong>in</strong> broadband policy are quite different from those of the other new member states, <strong>in</strong> that it<br />

is at a much more advanced stage than all of them, both <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>in</strong>frastructure penetration rates and <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of services offered, and from those of the old member states, <strong>in</strong> that low <strong>in</strong>come levels pose quite different<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts. The public sector cont<strong>in</strong>ues to play a lead<strong>in</strong>g role, notably by issu<strong>in</strong>g 700 000 cards digital ID-cards,<br />

which <strong>in</strong>clude personal certificates and private keys of the card-owner, and by push<strong>in</strong>g forward with edemocracy<br />

projects. In both cases, Estonia rema<strong>in</strong>s at the forefront of <strong>in</strong>novative applications as a means of<br />

foster<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure development.<br />

227 Estonian IT Policy: Towards a More Service-Centred and Citizen-Friendly State - Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of the Estonian Information Policy 2004–<br />

2006; M<strong>in</strong>istry of Economic Affairs and Communications<br />

227 Baltic Times, 13.4.2005


8.9 F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

8.9.1 Introduction<br />

Page 165 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land, an EU member s<strong>in</strong>ce 1995, is a fairly new broadband success story. As lateas 2003, F<strong>in</strong>land was often<br />

noted to be a laggard <strong>in</strong> broadband use, a somewhat surpris<strong>in</strong>g fact, given its early lead <strong>in</strong> the use of mobile<br />

telecommunications and the Internet. Broadband, however, started to advance rapidly <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> 2003. At the<br />

end of 2003, the lead<strong>in</strong>g EU countries, Denmark and Belgium, seemed to be only about 6 months ahead <strong>in</strong> the<br />

penetration curve, and the next ones, the Netherlands and Sweden about 3 months. Beh<strong>in</strong>d these countries,<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land was close to the U.S. penetration rates.<br />

8.9.2 The broadband market<br />

The access and use of broadband has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g at a very high rate <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land dur<strong>in</strong>g the last two years.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, the number of broadband connections was<br />

500,000 <strong>in</strong> January 2004, about 750,000 <strong>in</strong> December 2004, and about 950,000 <strong>in</strong> May 2005. Due to the fact<br />

that some operators count multi-dweller build<strong>in</strong>g access as one subscription, the actual number of broadband<br />

subscribers <strong>in</strong> May 2005 was close to one million. This equals to almost 20 broadband subscriptions per 100<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants. About 95 percent of households were with<strong>in</strong> the reach of broadband services, <strong>in</strong> most regions the<br />

coverage was close to 100 percent, and 36 percent of households actually subscribed to broadband <strong>in</strong> May<br />

2005. 229 The number of broadband connections almost doubled <strong>in</strong> 2003, and the growth <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> the second<br />

half of the year. This pace exceeds all previous forecasts. The speed of diffusion of broadband has been the<br />

fastest <strong>in</strong> the world <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land dur<strong>in</strong>g the last couple of years.<br />

The growth of different broadband technologies can be seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 53, which also shows the total number of<br />

access l<strong>in</strong>es to households. The decrease <strong>in</strong> the household access l<strong>in</strong>es is largely caused by the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g use of<br />

mobile phones. Already 36 percent of households used only mobile phones <strong>in</strong> February 2004. About 16 percent<br />

of mobile phone users were able to use <strong>in</strong>ternet or WAP services through their mobile phones. There were 87<br />

mobile subscriptions per 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land at the end of 2002. In November 2003 approximately 3.6<br />

million F<strong>in</strong>ns or 92 percent of those aged 15-74 had a personal mobile phone. Almost 74 percent of the F<strong>in</strong>nish<br />

population <strong>in</strong> that age group sends text messages weekly. 230 At the end of 2003, there were about 4.747 million<br />

mobile subscriptions, 231 imply<strong>in</strong>g that many mobile users have several phones. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the operators,<br />

analogue subscriber l<strong>in</strong>es are also <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly be<strong>in</strong>g replaced by DSL l<strong>in</strong>es that are used to carry Voice over<br />

Broadband. In 2003, the number of calls made us<strong>in</strong>g fixed l<strong>in</strong>e decreased 22 percent.<br />

From Figure 53 it is clear that DSL technologies have been driv<strong>in</strong>g broadband growth. They have also<br />

substituted basic-rate ISDN and leased l<strong>in</strong>es. The growth has been very rapid, as commercially DLS became<br />

available <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land only <strong>in</strong> year 2000.<br />

Due to the rapid growth, the exist<strong>in</strong>g estimates for future broadband penetration have been conservative. In<br />

2003, the IDC estimate expected the household penetration to reach 35.7 percent <strong>in</strong> 2007 (Figure 54). In fact,<br />

this number was reached <strong>in</strong> April 2005.<br />

In mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons, one has to note that, at present, the vary<strong>in</strong>g methods used to collect<br />

broadband statistics make comparisons difficult. Different data sources give different numbers for <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

countries, and different countries collect their broadband statistics us<strong>in</strong>g different def<strong>in</strong>itions and methods.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to IDC 232 and ECTA 233 estimates, cable modems represented about one fifth of broadband connections<br />

<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> 2003, and less than that <strong>in</strong> December 2004, about 17 percent. 234<br />

229<br />

http://www.laajakaista<strong>in</strong>fo.fi/laajakaista_tanaan/<strong>in</strong>dex.php. Earlier estimates stated that there would be about 400,000 connections and<br />

about 15 percent of households would be connected by the end of 2003. The goal of the government broadband strategy, to get one<br />

million broadband subscribers by the end of 2005, has already been exceeded.<br />

230<br />

Data provided by Juha Nurmela, Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land.<br />

231<br />

Data from Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land.<br />

232<br />

IDC 2003: European Broadband Access Services Market Analysis, 2002-2007.<br />

233<br />

ECTA 2003: DSL scorecard, end of September 2003.<br />

234<br />

ECTA 2005: DSL scorecard, Q4 2004. One should, however, note that the ECTA numbers are considerably lower than the numbers<br />

reported by five large broadband operators <strong>in</strong> their stock exchange reports (about 716,000). ECTA reports about 656,000 broadband<br />

connections, whereas the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications reports conservatively at least 750,000 subscribers.


2,500,000<br />

2,000,000<br />

1,500,000<br />

1,000,000<br />

500,000<br />

0<br />

Access l<strong>in</strong>es for residential use<br />

ISDN subscribers - basic rate<br />

DSL L<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Cable Modem Internet subscribers<br />

Other broadband access technologies to Internet<br />

Total broadband<br />

Page 166 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

1990 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Figure 53. Broadband growth <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. 235<br />

Figure 54: Estimated broadband access <strong>in</strong> households <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. IDC / OECD 2003.<br />

The total number of connections, however, seems to be too low <strong>in</strong> the ECTA estimates, which may mean that<br />

the relative share of cable is exaggerated. The ECTA DSL scorecard, for example, shows only 1000 broadband<br />

connections that are not DSL or cable connections <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land at the end of September 2003. This is clearly too<br />

low, at least if f<strong>in</strong>al subscribers are counted. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to FICORA 236 , there were a couple of thousand WLAN<br />

subscribers and 600 PLC subscribers <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land at the end of 2003, and there were also more than 4000<br />

FTTC/Ethernet connections <strong>in</strong> one local network <strong>in</strong> Espoo. IDC, on the other hand, seems to have too low<br />

household penetration numbers, and Informa gives a 18 percent ratio of cable to DSL, imply<strong>in</strong>g perhaps 14<br />

percent cable modem share. The share of cable modems therefore appears to be somewhere between 15-20<br />

235 Based on data from OECD, ECTA, F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, and year 2003 annual results of broadband<br />

providers. The OECD year 2002 estimate for “other” is adjusted (from 68,000 to 20,000) as it is apparently too high. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, the share of FTTH/LAN, PLC, and satellite was about 6.5 percent <strong>in</strong> 2003. The broadband<br />

numbers do not <strong>in</strong>clude leased l<strong>in</strong>e connections. The numbers may underestimate residential Ethernet subscribers, which were estimated<br />

to be 100,000-150,000 at the end of 2004. Some operators count connections to multi-household build<strong>in</strong>gs as a s<strong>in</strong>gle subscription.<br />

236 F<strong>in</strong>nish Communications Regulatory Authority 2004: Päätösluonnos huomattavasta markk<strong>in</strong>avoimasta tukkutason laajakaistapalvelujen<br />

markk<strong>in</strong>oilla, 127/934/2004, 19.2.2004. http://www.ficora.fi/suomi/document/M12_Keikyan_Puhel<strong>in</strong>osuuskunta_KK1.pdf


Page 167 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

percent of total broadband connections at the end of 2003. There were also at least two satellite broadband<br />

providers, although their relative share rema<strong>in</strong>ed low, partly because market<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>stallation services for<br />

satellite broadband equipment had started only recently.<br />

Figure 55: Household broadband access by technology <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. IDC 2003.<br />

The diffusion speed of broadband is potentially limited by the capabilities of the basic telecommunications<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure. In F<strong>in</strong>land this has not been a major issue, as the country has an advanced digital<br />

telecommunications <strong>in</strong>frastructure. For example, F<strong>in</strong>land has been among the first countries to digitalise its<br />

telecommunications networks, as can be seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 56.<br />

percent of total<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Sweden<br />

United States<br />

Korea<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

Figure 56: Percent of digital access l<strong>in</strong>es. 237<br />

In mid-2005, the fastest commercially available ADSL 2+ service was 24Mbps/1Mbps, at 69 euros per month.<br />

The first WiMAX networks were taken <strong>in</strong>to use <strong>in</strong> March 2005. A call for wireless broadband licenses was<br />

closed at the end of April, with seven firms apply<strong>in</strong>g for spectrum that had become available <strong>in</strong> the NMT 450<br />

megahertz area. This spectrum was to be used <strong>in</strong> particular for provid<strong>in</strong>g broadband access to remote areas. One<br />

of the operators, Saunalahti, announced that it would use flash-OFDM and <strong>in</strong>vest 30 million euros <strong>in</strong> 2005-2007<br />

237 OECD, Telecommunications Database 2003.


Page 168 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

to build a network that covers the whole country. Another bidder, Cubio Networks, announced that it would<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest 100 million to cover 99 percent of the population at speeds of up to 2.4 Mbps us<strong>in</strong>g cdma450.<br />

There were more than 250,000 digital TV receivers and set-top boxes <strong>in</strong> the F<strong>in</strong>nish households <strong>in</strong> February<br />

2004, or 11 percent of all households. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the next six months 15 percent of households were plann<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

purchase digiTV set-top boxes. 238 The F<strong>in</strong>nish Government made a decision <strong>in</strong> March 2004 that television<br />

broadcast<strong>in</strong>g will move to digital broadcast<strong>in</strong>g by the end of August 2007. This will make DVB-T a potential<br />

distribution channel for wireless datacast<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>crease the availability of broadband services through<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractive TV and mobile devices.<br />

In general, observ<strong>in</strong>g broadband subscriber growth <strong>in</strong> different countries, it seems that dur<strong>in</strong>g the last years<br />

broadband diffusion has been much more rapid that other network technologies. One possible reason for this is<br />

that broadband substitutes earlier technologies and its deployment can rely on user skills and usage patterns that<br />

have developed us<strong>in</strong>g narrow-band and LAN networks. This removes a major bottleneck from the diffusion<br />

process. 239 This, <strong>in</strong> fact, could be one of the explanations why broadband did catch up quickly <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> the<br />

last few years. Although statistics show that F<strong>in</strong>land has relatively low rate of secure servers—often <strong>in</strong>terpreted<br />

to imply a low rate of eCommerce—F<strong>in</strong>ns have extensively been us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational web content for a long<br />

time. As <strong>in</strong>ternational sites start to use multimedia content, the demand for fast access and download has<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased. In particular, the relatively good Internet backbone network has made end-subscriber access speed an<br />

important factor <strong>in</strong> the user experience. The bottlenecks, then, have been availability and pric<strong>in</strong>g. As technical<br />

developments have made fast deployment possible and as subscription prices have dropped, broadband<br />

penetration has <strong>in</strong>creased rapidly.<br />

8.9.2.1 Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 2003, broadband subscription costs have decreased extremely rapidly <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. Table 20 shows the<br />

prices <strong>in</strong> euros at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2005 and 2004, weighted by market shares between cable modem and DSL<br />

access. In 2004, the subscription fees dropped about 44 to 48 percent. In 2003, the fees dropped on average 22-<br />

40 percent, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the connection speed.<br />

Average monthly<br />

fee <strong>in</strong> euros<br />

Annual change<br />

bit rate, kbps 1.1.2005 1.1.2004 2004 2003<br />

256/256 21 39 -48% -22%<br />

512/512 26 48 -46% -25%<br />

1000/512 35 62 -44% -40%<br />

2000/512 47 99 -48%<br />

Table 20. Weighted ADSL and cable broadband monthly subscriber fees <strong>in</strong> 2004 and 2005. 240<br />

The cheapest cable modem subscription prices were 18.90 € per month and the cheapest 256 kbps ADSL was<br />

19.90 € per month <strong>in</strong> May 2005. The operators have frequently had special offers where, for example, service<br />

<strong>in</strong>stallation costs have been lowered or waived. For example, a 1Mbps/768kbps ASDL subscription was<br />

available for 36 € per month with zero <strong>in</strong>stallation cost <strong>in</strong> May 2005. The monthly subscription fees and setup<br />

charges at 1 st January 2005 are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 22.<br />

The broadband subscription fees have decreased rapidly, but F<strong>in</strong>land started with fees that were considerably<br />

above those of many other EU countries. The relative subscription fees for 256 kbps and 2 Mbps ADSL among<br />

EU countries is shown <strong>in</strong> and Table 24, us<strong>in</strong>g the F<strong>in</strong>nish service basket as a reference po<strong>in</strong>t. F<strong>in</strong>land had about<br />

twice as high subscription fees than U.K. <strong>in</strong> 256 kbps ADSL and about four times higher fees <strong>in</strong> 2 Mbps ADSL<br />

than Belgium. In general, the price differences were considerable across EU when higher speed connections are<br />

compared.<br />

238 Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land, 2004: Tilastouutisia 3.3. 2004, Kuluttajabarometri: Digiboksi yli 250 000 taloudessa helmikuussa.<br />

239 Cf. Yang et al. 2003: Diffusion of Broadband Mobile Services <strong>in</strong> Korea: The Role of Standards and Its Impact on Diffusion of Complex<br />

Technology System, http://weatherhead.cwru.edu/pervasive/Paper/UBE%202003%20-%20Yoo.pdf<br />

240 Compiled from M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications data, LVM 21/2004 and LVM 27/2005.


Page 169 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Operator Type Speed Connection cost Monthly fee, €<br />

Sonera ADSL 512/512 kbit/s 129 48<br />

Sonera Cable ~750/256 kbit/s 49 49<br />

Elisa ADSL 512/512 kbit/s 126 49<br />

Elisa Cable 512/128 kbit/s 50 46<br />

ADSL 256/256 127.89 44.26<br />

F<strong>in</strong>net<br />

ADSL<br />

ADSL<br />

512<br />

1Mb<br />

129.42<br />

124.92<br />

50.91<br />

70.73<br />

ADSL 2Mb 127.20 109.33<br />

HTV Welho Cable 525/200 50 49<br />

Saunalahti ADSL 512/512 kbit/s 160 46<br />

Jyväsviest<strong>in</strong>tä KaNetti Cable 700/200 kbit/s 49 48<br />

PäijätVisio Cable 500/100 kbit/s 80 49.90<br />

Vattidata PLC 1Mb/256 kbit/s 70 49<br />

Turku Energia PLC ~750/? kbit/s 50 46<br />

RS-Solutions WLAN 512/512 kbit/s 0 42<br />

Wireless Solutions<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

TiscaliSat<br />

WLAN<br />

Satellite<br />

512/512 kbit/s<br />

400/- kbit/s<br />

0<br />

49.90<br />

42.05<br />

39.90<br />

Table 21. Some broadband service offers <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, October 2003. 241<br />

241 Source: “Kansall<strong>in</strong>en laajakaistastrategia” (The National F<strong>in</strong>nish Broadband Strategy). Publications of the F<strong>in</strong>nish<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, 50/2003, December 2003.


Page 170 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Monthly fee, €<br />

Operator Setup, € 256/256 512/512 1M/512 2M/512<br />

Auria Oy, (Sonera Adsl) 198 24,9 29,9 33,9 39,9<br />

dna Laajakaista (H:g<strong>in</strong> seutu) 157 19,9 23,9 37 48<br />

Elisa Oyj / Hels<strong>in</strong>ki 123 19,9 24,9 36 49<br />

Elisa Oyj/ Tampere 123 25,9 33 37 47<br />

Etelä-Satakunnan Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 50 35 46 55 65<br />

Forssan Seudun Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy *) 49 24 - 44 54<br />

Hämeen Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy, (Son Adsl) 129 - 24,9 36 47<br />

Kajaan<strong>in</strong> Puhel<strong>in</strong>osuuskunta *) 50 22,9 24,9 32 45<br />

Kokkolan Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 133 - 24,5 34,9 43<br />

Kotikaupung<strong>in</strong> Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy *) 92 - 41 47 49<br />

Kuopion Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oyj 188 24,9 28 32 47<br />

Kymen Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 199 - 24,9 30 46<br />

Lohjan Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 99 23,5 - 34,5 44,5<br />

Lounet Oy (Elisa Adsl) 143 25,9 29 33 39<br />

Lännen Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 165 29,4 34,4 39,4 46,4<br />

Mariehamns Telefon Ab 1) 49 29 - - 49<br />

Mikkel<strong>in</strong> Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oyj *) 49 - 24,9 36 47<br />

Multi.fi (Pietarsaari) 139 - 25,9 34,9 41,9<br />

Oulun Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oyj 138 - 25 33 47<br />

Pohjanmaan PPO Oy 78 25 28 36 48<br />

Pohjois-Hämeen Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 158 25,9 32 38 48<br />

Päijät-Hämeen Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oyj 169 19,5 23,5 30,9 45,9<br />

Salon Seudun Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 127 19,9 26,9 30,9 36,9<br />

Satakunnan Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 158 - 25,9 35,9 41,9<br />

Saunalahti ADSL 227 19,9 24,5 36 42<br />

Savonl<strong>in</strong>nan Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy *) 99 24 28 36 48<br />

Sonera Oyj 198 - 25,9 34 47<br />

Tikka Communications Oy 143 - 24,9 31 38<br />

Vaasan Lään<strong>in</strong> Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy 145 - 29 37 47<br />

Vakka- Suomen Puhel<strong>in</strong> Oy *) 79 25,9 33,9 38,9 45,9<br />

Weighed average 151 21 26 35 47<br />

for items marked *), setup charge only, for others, setup and <strong>in</strong>stallation<br />

Marienhamns Telefon Ab offers only speeds of 8M/600kbps-12M/800kbps<br />

Table 22. ADSL setup charges and montly fees by some F<strong>in</strong>nish operators, 1 January 2005


Page 171 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Country Monthly fee Operators Price (F<strong>in</strong>land =100)<br />

UK 28,55 1 57,8<br />

Netherlands 30,21 6 61,1<br />

Sweden 33,27 1 67,3<br />

Italy 36,95 1 74,7<br />

Luxemburg 39,00 2 78,9<br />

Denmark 45,81 2 92,7<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> 47,82 5 96,7<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land 49,43 15 100,0<br />

Greece 52,54 2 106,3<br />

Portugal 65,00 1 131,5<br />

Table 23. ADSL subscription fees for 256 kbps, <strong>in</strong>dex, FI=100. 242<br />

Country Monthly fee Operators Price (F<strong>in</strong>land =100)<br />

Belgium 243 26,07 5 23,9<br />

Sweden 52,85 1 48,5<br />

Austria 59,00 1 54,2<br />

Germany 60,84 1 55,9<br />

UK 63,75 1 58,5<br />

Italy 104,03 2 95,5<br />

Denmark 105,16 4 96,5<br />

Netherlands 105,16 4 96,5<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land 108,92 22 100,0<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> 174,27 3 160,0<br />

Greece 300,00 1 275,4<br />

Table 24. ADSL subscription fees for 2Mbps, <strong>in</strong>dex FI =100. 244<br />

242 Source: “EU-maiden ADSL- ja kaapelimodeemiyhteyksien kuluttajah<strong>in</strong>nat” (ADSL and cable modem subscriber prices <strong>in</strong> the EU<br />

countries), Publications of the F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, 49/2003, October 2003.<br />

243 The price for Belgium is calculated from 3-4 Mbps service offer<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

244 Source: “EU-maiden ADSL- ja kaapelimodeemiyhteyksien kuluttajah<strong>in</strong>nat, lokakuu 2003” (ASDL and cable modem subscriber prices <strong>in</strong><br />

the EU countries). Publications of the F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, 49/2003, October 2003.


8.9.2.2 Competition<br />

Page 172 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

F<strong>in</strong>nish telecommunications operations were opened up for competition <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s. The GSM networks<br />

and data transfer were opened up to competition <strong>in</strong> 1990, and full-fledged competition <strong>in</strong> local, trunk and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational telecommunications began <strong>in</strong> 1994. Today, sett<strong>in</strong>g up telecommunications services generally only<br />

requires notification to the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, with only the construction of mobile<br />

phone networks requir<strong>in</strong>g a government license. 245<br />

The three biggest operators had relatively similar market shares (18-27 %) <strong>in</strong> year 2003, and there are no<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant players. The F<strong>in</strong>nish telecom market, however, is rather unique <strong>in</strong> Europe <strong>in</strong> that historically there has<br />

not been a s<strong>in</strong>gle national telecom operator. There exist a large number of typically small regional operators that<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ate their local markets both for cable TV and fixed l<strong>in</strong>e telephony. These operators often have 80-90<br />

percent market share <strong>in</strong> their regions. The regional operators also often own the regional cable networks. The<br />

large number of regional operators has created problems <strong>in</strong> access to the local loop, both because of<br />

monopolistic pric<strong>in</strong>g and because of vary<strong>in</strong>g terms of access <strong>in</strong> the different regions that has made country-wide<br />

services difficult to roll-out. In total, there were 220 telecom service providers <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> March 2005.<br />

Operator %<br />

TeliaSonera 32.5<br />

Elisa 27.2<br />

F<strong>in</strong>net 17.1<br />

HTV Welho 11.3<br />

Others 11.9<br />

Table 25. Market shares of the biggest broadband providers <strong>in</strong> 2002. 246<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>nish Competition Authority has actively <strong>in</strong>tervened <strong>in</strong> the broadband market. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the first half of<br />

2003, the FCA <strong>in</strong>vestigated over 40 local operators. The F<strong>in</strong>nish Competition Authority told <strong>in</strong> December 2003<br />

that it was plann<strong>in</strong>g to sue those operators that still use their monopoly positions to limit competitor access to<br />

local loop. Prior to the start of the FCA’s project, almost all the local telecom companies collected such high<br />

broadband access charges that the entry of compet<strong>in</strong>g operators <strong>in</strong>to the retail market was virtually impossible.<br />

When the average broadband access charge exceeded the average 50€ consumer price by 15 percent, outside<br />

ISPs could <strong>in</strong> no way provide the service commercially. The telecom companies have also asked from ISP<br />

operators a wholesale price that has been several times as high as that asked by the company itself from<br />

consumers and other retail customers. Additionally, some telecom operators have totally refused to lease<br />

broadband service connections to compet<strong>in</strong>g operators. 247<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce then the F<strong>in</strong>nish Communications Regulatory Authority (FICORA) has systematically followed broadband<br />

competition and pric<strong>in</strong>g. It has rather aggressively pushed for non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory backbone pric<strong>in</strong>g, organized<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry meet<strong>in</strong>gs to discuss access pric<strong>in</strong>g and policies, and monitored regional operators who have significant<br />

market power. Although the very large number of regional operators makes active <strong>in</strong>tervention difficult <strong>in</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>land, FICORA has quite successfully <strong>in</strong>tervened <strong>in</strong> monopolistic pric<strong>in</strong>g and, for example, delays <strong>in</strong><br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g access to compet<strong>in</strong>g providers.<br />

Also the F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications has put considerable pressure on telecom operators<br />

to improve competition <strong>in</strong> the broadband area. Partly this has occurred through systematical studies that show<br />

pric<strong>in</strong>g differences and which create pric<strong>in</strong>g transparency and reveal anomalies <strong>in</strong> the competitive landscape.<br />

FICORA has also requested that all the major broadband service providers publish their pric<strong>in</strong>g on the web. This<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation is now readily available to consumers through a broadband portal that has been set up as part of the<br />

F<strong>in</strong>nish Government Broadband Strategy. It seems that these Government <strong>in</strong>itiatives are at least partly beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

the fact that access and retail prices have rapidly decreased.<br />

245<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of F<strong>in</strong>ance: Product and capital market reforms <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. November 2001.<br />

http://europa.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/comm/economy_f<strong>in</strong>ance/epc/documents/sf02_en.pdf.<br />

246<br />

Source: IDC 2003.<br />

247<br />

F<strong>in</strong>nish Competition Authority, press release, 27 June 2003, http://www.kilpailuvirasto.fi/cgi-b<strong>in</strong>/english.cgi?luku=newsarchive&sivu=news/n-2003-06-27


percent<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Page 173 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

United States<br />

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001<br />

Figure 57: Total PTO <strong>in</strong>vestment per revenue <strong>in</strong> some countries. 248<br />

The development of broadband services also crucially depends on the <strong>in</strong>vestments that service providers make.<br />

This is obviously limited by the revenues that operators get from their operations. In general, public<br />

telecommunication operators have decreased their <strong>in</strong>vestments as a ratio of their total revenues s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1980s.<br />

This can be seen from Figure 57. The <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> Figure 5 do not <strong>in</strong>clude 3G spectrum license fees, which<br />

were about 93.5 billion <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>in</strong> OECD countries. 249 The F<strong>in</strong>nish Government did not auction spectrum, but<br />

F<strong>in</strong>nish telecom operators paid considerable sums for licenses <strong>in</strong> Germany and Italy.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>vestments made by the F<strong>in</strong>nish public telecommunication operators have been around 100 USD per<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitant dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade, without 3G license fees. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1997, the total revenue per <strong>in</strong>habitant has been<br />

over the OECD average, reach<strong>in</strong>g 800 USD <strong>in</strong> 2001. F<strong>in</strong>nish PTOs have typically <strong>in</strong>vested less per <strong>in</strong>habitant<br />

than OECD average but more than, for example, Korea. The household consumption of telecommunications<br />

services has been grow<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uously dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade, reach<strong>in</strong>g 850 euros per household <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

Given the rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> telecommunication costs, this implies a large <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the use of<br />

telecommunications services. In 1996, the consumption of telecommunication services was only 360 euros per<br />

household. 250<br />

8.9.2.3 Demand: consumers<br />

Broadband use has rapidly expanded <strong>in</strong> the recent years, and there are few detailed studies on its actual use <strong>in</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>land. Often the consumer benefits of broadband are described as potential benefits, such as improved speed<br />

of download<strong>in</strong>g large files, capability for <strong>in</strong>teractive video, and efficient telework<strong>in</strong>g. In practice, the current<br />

major broadband benefits seem to be its “always on” characteristic, its usually predictable flat-rate pric<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

the fact that normal phone calls are available while the Internet is be<strong>in</strong>g used. Compared with traditional dial-up,<br />

the improvement of connection setup time is a considerable change, and broadband connections facilitate<br />

efficient use of networked resources and communication. On the other hand, when broadband connections are<br />

always on, their security risks have also become of major concern.<br />

For specific user groups, such as active users of peer-to-peer music and video shar<strong>in</strong>g systems, high-speed<br />

connections represent a considerable improvement over narrow-band connections, and make the peer-to-peer<br />

248 Source: OECD Telecommunications Database 2003.<br />

249 OECD Communications Outlook 2003, p. 18.<br />

250 Source: M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, LVM 27/2005.<br />

Korea<br />

OECD<br />

Ireland<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Sweden


Page 174 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

server architecture possible <strong>in</strong> the first place. Much of the current peer-to-peer network traffic, however, is<br />

created by the unclear situation with copyright enforcement on the net. Similarly, most of the email traffic today<br />

is created by spam and, <strong>in</strong>deed, many broadband-connected computers are today used to send spam mail by<br />

breach<strong>in</strong>g their security. As the legal status of spam and digital rights management systems becomes clarified,<br />

the need for broadband may be somewhat reduced. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Pew Internet & American Life project, the<br />

percentage of onl<strong>in</strong>e Americans download<strong>in</strong>g music files on the Internet dropped by half between April and<br />

November 2003, when RIAA began fil<strong>in</strong>g suits aga<strong>in</strong>st those suspected of copyright <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement. Peer-to-peer<br />

traffic represented one fifth to half of the total network traffic <strong>in</strong> the mid-2003. 251 Efficient enforcement and<br />

digital rights management systems could, therefore, considerably dim<strong>in</strong>ish network traffic <strong>in</strong> the short term.<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>ns are among the most active Internet users with<strong>in</strong> the EU. 61 percent of F<strong>in</strong>ns <strong>in</strong> the 15-74 age group<br />

had their own email addresses <strong>in</strong> October 2003 and 63 percent of email address owners used their email daily. 252<br />

In February 2004, however, only 59 percent of households had PCs. 253 The relatively high percentage of Internet<br />

users compared with the households with PCs results from the fact that larger households typically have PCs and<br />

almost all households with PCs are connected to the Internet, as well as from the fact that some people get<br />

access to the Internet at their workplaces and us<strong>in</strong>g public access po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

People who acquired broadband connection <strong>in</strong> 2003 <strong>in</strong>creased their Internet use considerably. On average, the<br />

weekly use of Internet <strong>in</strong>creased 4 hours. The <strong>in</strong>crease was most strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sparsely populated areas, where men<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased their weekly use by 6 hours and women by 2.5 hours on average. Increase by people aged under 40<br />

averaged 1.5 hours more than that of people aged over 40. Broadband users also seem to be relatively well<br />

aware of the security problems associated with broadband. About 70 percent of household with broadband have<br />

a firewall <strong>in</strong> their home PC and about 60 percent have virus protection for <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g email. 254<br />

percent of Internet users<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Information search<br />

email<br />

Bank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment surf<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Public services<br />

Dowload<strong>in</strong>g programs and files<br />

Newsgroups and news<br />

Buy<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Study<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Remote work<br />

Figure 58: Internet use <strong>in</strong> the Tampere region, F<strong>in</strong>land. 255<br />

Chat / IRC<br />

Voice over IP<br />

Personal email, <strong>in</strong>formation retrieval, net surf<strong>in</strong>g, and e-bank<strong>in</strong>g are the most common uses of the Internet <strong>in</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>land. The popularity of different services is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 58.<br />

251 Hadenius, P. (2004): Reliev<strong>in</strong>g peer-to-peer pressure. Technology Review, February 25, 2004.<br />

http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/wo_hadenius022504.asp. Sandv<strong>in</strong>e has recently claimed that up to 80 percent of residential<br />

Internet traffic can now be peer-to-peer traffic generated by KaZaA, eDonkey, and W<strong>in</strong>MX<br />

(http://www.sandv<strong>in</strong>e.com/news/pr_detail.asp?ID=40).<br />

252 Data from Juha Nurmela, Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land, March 2004.<br />

253 Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land, 2004: Tilastouutisia 3.3. 2004, Kuluttajabarometri: Digiboksi yli 250 000 taloudessa helmikuussa.<br />

254 Data from Juha Nurmela, Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land, March 2004.<br />

255 Data from eTampere / Infocity 2003 survey conducted <strong>in</strong> October 2003 by Taloustutkimus Oy.<br />

2000<br />

2003


percent of all Internet users <strong>in</strong> the age group<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Page 175 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

10-29 years<br />

30-54 years<br />

55+ years<br />

Personal email<br />

Information retrieval and free services<br />

Surf<strong>in</strong>g the net<br />

Bank<strong>in</strong>g and other f<strong>in</strong>ancial services<br />

Play<strong>in</strong>g games with others onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Chatt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Download<strong>in</strong>g music<br />

Electronic questionnaires and forms<br />

Noticeboard discussions<br />

e-learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Mak<strong>in</strong>g own web pages<br />

Found a friend through the web<br />

Has used email on a domestic trip<br />

Has used email on a trip abroad<br />

Internet users <strong>in</strong> age group<br />

Figure 59: Use of Internet applications <strong>in</strong> different age groups at the end of 2002. 256<br />

Some recent studies have focused on the use of the Internet among the elderly population of over 50 years of<br />

age. In this demographic group, the use of the Internet appears to be limited by relatively high perceived costs<br />

when compared with expected benefits, difficult non-ergonomic work<strong>in</strong>g positions, difficulties <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

mouse and keyboard, and representation of content <strong>in</strong> ways that require good eyesight.<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

email<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation search and free services<br />

www-brows<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

games<br />

fill<strong>in</strong>g of electronic forms<br />

shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

distance learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

creation of web pages<br />

discussion boards<br />

dat<strong>in</strong>g and meet<strong>in</strong>g new friends<br />

chat<br />

music download<strong>in</strong>g<br />

buy<strong>in</strong>g groceries<br />

bu<strong>in</strong>g other goods<br />

buy<strong>in</strong>g tickets<br />

library services<br />

search<strong>in</strong>g for job<br />

tax services<br />

social security services<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

All<br />

Nurmela & Ylitalo, 2003<br />

Tuorila, 2004<br />

Figure 60: Uses of the Internet <strong>in</strong> the 50+ age group <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. 257<br />

public health service <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

other<br />

256 Nurmela Juha & Ylitalo Marko (2003): The Evolution of the Information Society. How Information Society skills and attitudes have<br />

changed <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land 1996 - 2002. Reviews 2003/4, Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land, Table 6.5.


Page 176 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications has launched a research program <strong>in</strong> 2002 that focuses<br />

on the use and user perceptions of broadband. In a survey conducted <strong>in</strong> May 2002, 21 percent of F<strong>in</strong>ns without<br />

broadband access felt that they would need one. In general, the various studies show that both the use and<br />

perceived benefits of broadband <strong>in</strong>crease with higher household <strong>in</strong>come, higher levels of education, and<br />

household size. Low <strong>in</strong>comes, low levels of education, unemployment, lack of children under 18 years <strong>in</strong> the<br />

household, and age of over 44 years decrease both the use and perceived benefits of broadband. 258<br />

It is possible that the ga<strong>in</strong>s from broadband would be similar to those <strong>in</strong> other countries. Experts have argued<br />

that applications of particular importance for broadband diffusion <strong>in</strong>clude IP telephony, video, audio, gam<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e photos, telework<strong>in</strong>g, e-commerce, and local content. 259<br />

8.9.2.4 Demand: bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />

Many medium sized and large companies have been connected to the Internet us<strong>in</strong>g leased l<strong>in</strong>es. At the end of<br />

2001, F<strong>in</strong>land had about 60 leased l<strong>in</strong>es per 100 000 <strong>in</strong>habitants, the fifth highest <strong>in</strong> EU after Denmark, Sweden,<br />

Luxembourg and the Netherlands. In the spr<strong>in</strong>g 2003, 94 percent of all bus<strong>in</strong>esses that employed more than five<br />

persons used the Internet, and 99 percent of firms with 20-49 employees had Internet connections. In bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

services and wholesale trade the number reached 99 percent, whereas <strong>in</strong> construction and car sales it was around<br />

85 percent. 58 percent of all firms with more than five employees had their own web site. 260 Broadband was used<br />

by 63 percent of firms employ<strong>in</strong>g five or more people <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 2004. 261 The connection types used by firms can<br />

be seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 61.<br />

Figure 61: Internet connection types <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish firms, spr<strong>in</strong>g 2003. 262<br />

257 Tuorila, H., 2004: Yli 50-vuotiaat Internet-palvelujen käyttäj<strong>in</strong>ä (People over 50 as users of the Internet), National Consumer Research<br />

Centre, Publications 2/2004. Nurmela Juha & Ylitalo Marko (2003): The Evolution of the Information Society. How Information Society<br />

skills and attitudes have changed <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land 1996 - 2002. Reviews 2003/4, Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land.<br />

258 Koivumäki, M. & H. Soronen, 2003: Laajakaistapalvelujen käyttötarpeet: Internetiä käyttämättömät lähikuvassa (User needs for<br />

broadband services: close shot of non-users of <strong>in</strong>ternet). Publications of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, 27/2003, May<br />

2003.<br />

259 Reynolds, T. 2003: Promot<strong>in</strong>g Broadband.<br />

260 Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land: Internet ja sähkö<strong>in</strong>en kauppa yrityksissä 2003 (Internet and electronic commerce <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess firms 2003).<br />

261 Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land: Internet ja sähkö<strong>in</strong>en kauppa yrityksissä 2004.<br />

262 Source: Statistics F<strong>in</strong>land: Internet ja sähkö<strong>in</strong>en kauppa yrityksissä 2003.


8.9.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 177 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The current F<strong>in</strong>nish Information Society Programme is coord<strong>in</strong>ated by the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister and the program<br />

management is located at the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister’s Office. An important rationale for this arrangement has been the<br />

belief that efficient implementation of Information Society <strong>in</strong>itiatives requires collaboration across the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istries, and coord<strong>in</strong>ation at the highest policy levels. The M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications has set<br />

up a project to follow the implementation of the F<strong>in</strong>nish broadband strategy, and an associated web-site that acts<br />

as a portal for broadband <strong>in</strong>formation. 263 The national regulatory agency FICORA and the F<strong>in</strong>nish Competition<br />

Authority have important roles <strong>in</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and enforc<strong>in</strong>g competition and standards.<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>nish government published a resolution on the national broadband strategy at the end of January 2004. It<br />

states that:<br />

“High-speed telecommunications with nationwide coverage are essential for achievement of the Government's<br />

objectives. A high-quality, efficient communications <strong>in</strong>frastructure will improve productivity and promote<br />

economic growth <strong>in</strong> all sectors. It will also advance the development of new forms of work and bus<strong>in</strong>ess, thereby<br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g the ability of companies to compete. Furthermore, good telecommunications <strong>in</strong>frastructure will<br />

facilitate improvements <strong>in</strong> the quality and availability of public services, provid<strong>in</strong>g a useful tool for develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

these services, especially <strong>in</strong> sparsely populated areas. Comprehensive provision of high-speed<br />

telecommunications is also vital <strong>in</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g regional equality..” 264<br />

The strategy is:<br />

• to promote competition with<strong>in</strong> and between all communications networks,<br />

• to promote the provision of electronic services and content,<br />

• to stimulate demand for broadband services,<br />

• to cont<strong>in</strong>ue and develop special support measures <strong>in</strong> those areas <strong>in</strong> which there is <strong>in</strong>sufficient demand<br />

for the commercial supply of broadband facilities.<br />

The accompany<strong>in</strong>g strategy targets <strong>in</strong>clude hav<strong>in</strong>g 1 million broadband connections <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land by the end of<br />

2005, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all access technologies; affordable high-speed access for everyone, with comprehensive<br />

geographical coverage. The goal is also that F<strong>in</strong>land will be a European leader <strong>in</strong> the availability and use of<br />

high-speed telecommunications.<br />

The strategy notes that the appropriate connection methods depend on regional factors and the level of demand.<br />

The measures and <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the strategy are designed to be technology neutral to guarantee the<br />

parallel development of alternative technologies and effective competition. The strategy explicitly discusses<br />

cable networks, DVB-T, UMTS, FTTH, FTTC/Ethernet, WLAN, PLC, xDSL, and satellite.<br />

The broadband strategy is closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to the F<strong>in</strong>nish <strong>in</strong>formation society policy programme. The current<br />

programme was adopted by the government <strong>in</strong> September 2003, and it cont<strong>in</strong>ues the previous government<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation society programmes and strategies. The programme is coord<strong>in</strong>ated by the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation society, as a means to promote welfare, susta<strong>in</strong>able development, transparency, accountability,<br />

democracy, good governance and societal and economic development, has been a central theme <strong>in</strong> the F<strong>in</strong>nish<br />

government programs s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid-1990s. Nevertheless, recent research has shown that up to 77 percent of the<br />

F<strong>in</strong>nish households did not feel that they needed broadband services:<br />

There have been several <strong>in</strong>itiatives to extend the discussion on the challenges and priorities of the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

society beyond traditional policy circles and to engage the citizens <strong>in</strong> the policy def<strong>in</strong>ition. An onl<strong>in</strong>e forum<br />

“Knowledge society – society of the future?” was launched on 17.2.2004. Comments and contributions from the<br />

citizens were used to focus the <strong>in</strong>formation society programme and the <strong>in</strong>puts from the discussion will be fed<br />

back to the group of m<strong>in</strong>isters and to the F<strong>in</strong>nish Information Society Council.<br />

There also exist several regional <strong>in</strong>formation society strategies and <strong>in</strong>itiatives that try to promote broadband use.<br />

These <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>itiatives at the Turku265 , Tampere266 , and Oulu267 regions. In general, the F<strong>in</strong>nish <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

emphasize convergence and multiplatform solutions where services and applications can be accessed us<strong>in</strong>g fixed<br />

and mobile term<strong>in</strong>als.<br />

263 http://www.laajakaista<strong>in</strong>fo.fi<br />

264 http://www.laajakaista<strong>in</strong>fo.fi/english/<strong>in</strong>dex.php<br />

265 http://www.turku.fi/tietoyhteiskunta/Ihm<strong>in</strong>en_turku_engl.pdf<br />

266 http://www.etampere.fi/office/en/<br />

267 http://www.oulu.ouka.fi/smartoulu/english/paasivu.htm


8.9.3.1 Open policy issues<br />

Page 178 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Open and emerg<strong>in</strong>g policy issues <strong>in</strong>clude regional coverage and universal service provision. The current policy<br />

emphasizes the role of regional authorities and commercial actors <strong>in</strong> service development, as well as technology<br />

neutrality. To <strong>in</strong>crease regional availability, the F<strong>in</strong>nish Competitive Authority and the F<strong>in</strong>nish Communications<br />

Regulatory Authority have actively pursued local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g and competition <strong>in</strong> broadband wholesale<br />

market. F<strong>in</strong>land also released wireless spectrum <strong>in</strong> the 450 megahertz band for launch<strong>in</strong>g commercial services<br />

that can reach remote areas and cover the whole country at 1-2 Mbps speeds.<br />

The regulation of Voice of Broadband is becom<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly visible topic as many consumers will<br />

potentially switch to broadband telephony services, where, for example, emergency service access may require<br />

new approaches. The December 2004 update of the F<strong>in</strong>nish Broadband Strategy highlighted the promotion of<br />

VoIP as one of its new strategic areas. It also set a new goal of hav<strong>in</strong>g at least 90 percent of all Internet<br />

connections broadband, with at least 8Mbps speeds, by 2007.<br />

The diffusion of powerl<strong>in</strong>e broadband (PLC) was also delayed as measurement revealed that PLC technology<br />

creates electromagnetic <strong>in</strong>terference levels that exceed accepted limits. The newer PLC technologies, however,<br />

seem to avoid most of these problems.<br />

Local actors <strong>in</strong> counties have become active <strong>in</strong> deploy<strong>in</strong>g their own fiber networks across the country. A number<br />

of cities and regional actors, such as universities, have also started to roll-out wireless WiFi networks that<br />

support national roam<strong>in</strong>g. Some of these provide free broadband access for visitors and citizens, others are free<br />

but closed, serv<strong>in</strong>g university students and teachers. There are also networks that are based on open<strong>in</strong>g up<br />

private WiFi base stations so that free access is reciprocally provided to those who participate <strong>in</strong> the network.<br />

Security and privacy are important areas for policy development. The F<strong>in</strong>nish Consumer Agency notified<br />

operators <strong>in</strong> November 2004 that <strong>in</strong> their market<strong>in</strong>g they have to clearly show whether essential services such as<br />

virus and spam filters are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the subscription price. FICORA, <strong>in</strong> turn, gave new email configuration<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es for operators, so that the use of external mail addresses will be possible without allow<strong>in</strong>g spam<br />

mail<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>nish universities and research centers are connected by the FUNET network (Figure 62). This is the<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al Internet backbone <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. It has some 80 user organisations and 300 000 users. Funet is managed by<br />

the F<strong>in</strong>nish Center for Scientific Comput<strong>in</strong>g (CSC). It has recently <strong>in</strong>stalled routers that are capable of 10 gigabit<br />

rates with<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. The ma<strong>in</strong> backbone service provider is currently TeliaSonera. The customer organisations<br />

are typically connected us<strong>in</strong>g black fibre, Ethernet, or Gigabit Ethernet. Funet makes <strong>in</strong>ternational connections<br />

through Nordunet with 10 Gbps and 2.5 Gbps, and the connections to commercial service providers through<br />

Ficix 268 , via 1 Gbps connections.<br />

8.9.3.2 Broadband Rollout Scenarios<br />

The broadband rollout scenarios and cost estimates described below are based on an earlier version of this<br />

report. They are not updated for this version. As the equipment, <strong>in</strong>stallation and operation costs are chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rapidly and as new technical architectures such as WiMAX and flash-OFDM are becom<strong>in</strong>g available, the cost<br />

estimates would require some adjustments. For example, the bidders for the new 450 megahertz license have<br />

argued that they can cover the whole country and about 150,000 remote users by <strong>in</strong>vestments of 30 million<br />

euros.<br />

The F<strong>in</strong>nish M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications conducted an early study on technical and f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

viability of broadband <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land. 269 This study is useful, as it gives some basel<strong>in</strong>e estimates for the costs and<br />

requirements of roll<strong>in</strong>g out broadband <strong>in</strong> the difficult geographical sett<strong>in</strong>g of F<strong>in</strong>land. The study analyses<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation society services and their data transmission requirements, the status of backbone, regional and<br />

access networks, and surveys the ma<strong>in</strong> bottlenecks and challenges for broadband roll out, as seen by potential<br />

service providers. The study also analyses exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies that could be used to roll-out broadband<br />

services <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, and calculates costs for various alternative approaches.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the study, 95 percent of the F<strong>in</strong>nish population was liv<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> a less than a few kilometers from<br />

optical fiber <strong>in</strong> year 2000. Although <strong>in</strong> some rural counties up to half of the exchanges and concentrators did not<br />

have optical fiber l<strong>in</strong>ks, more than 90 percent of the population also <strong>in</strong> these counties were with<strong>in</strong> the access.<br />

Most of the households and bus<strong>in</strong>esses were less than 2 km from exchanges or concentrators.<br />

268 F<strong>in</strong>nish Communication and Internet Exchange: http://www.ficix.fi<br />

269 Laajakaista kaikille ? Tekniset ja taloudelliset edellytykset Suomessa (Broadband for everyone? Technical and f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability <strong>in</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>land), Publications of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, 41/00.<br />

http://www.m<strong>in</strong>tc.fi/www/sivut/dokumentit/julkaisu/julkaisusarja/2000/rapt41a.pdf


Figure 62. FUNET Internet backbone.<br />

Page 179 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

More recently, these figures have been updated, show<strong>in</strong>g that 448 counties, or 95 percent of all F<strong>in</strong>nish counties,<br />

were connected to fiber. This represented 99 percent of the population. Over 50 percent of the counties had more<br />

than one fiber network provider. In 2002 fiber was connected to about 5200 concentrators, represent<strong>in</strong>g 85<br />

percent of all concentrators and 98 percent of population. 270<br />

The study notes that already the exist<strong>in</strong>g access network has so much capacity that if it would be fully used,<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational connections would become a major bottleneck. The reason is that the operators have to pay<br />

relatively high prices for <strong>in</strong>ternational connections and therefore they only provide limited capacity. The study<br />

also refers to tests that showed that a 128 kbps ISDN was clearly faster than most megabit-connections when<br />

used for <strong>in</strong>ternational web surf<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

270 Pentti, J., Sassi, J. & M. Kääriä<strong>in</strong>en 2003: Ruots<strong>in</strong> ja Suomen laajakaistayhteyksien kattavuus (Broadband coverage <strong>in</strong> Sweden and<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land). Publications of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Transport and Communications, 21/2003, April 2003.


Total<br />

In counties with fiber<br />

access<br />

Counties 460 430 / 95 %<br />

Page 180 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

With<strong>in</strong> regional fiber<br />

networks<br />

Population 5.1 M 5.1 M / 99 % 4.8 milj. / 95 % *)<br />

Switches and<br />

concentrators<br />

5 900 5 800 / 99 % 4700 / 80 %<br />

Phone l<strong>in</strong>es 2.8 M 2.8 M / 99 % 2.65 M / 95 %<br />

Table 26. Optic fiber <strong>in</strong> backbone and regional networks, F<strong>in</strong>land, year 2000,<br />

The study estimates that only about 2000 km fiber cable would be needed to cover all the counties that still<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed without fiber connections <strong>in</strong> year 2000, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to an <strong>in</strong>vestment of approximately 15 million<br />

euros. 271 When fiber would be extended also to the smallest concentrators, 10,000 km new cable would be<br />

needed, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to roughly 170 million euros. Assum<strong>in</strong>g that optical fiber would be extended to all<br />

200,000 bus<strong>in</strong>esses and 2.3 million households, the cost could be 3,300 million euros. 272<br />

The amount of traffic through the F<strong>in</strong>nish Internet exchange FICIX is available trough the FICIX web site<br />

http://stats.lanwan.fi/ficix. This covers the traffic only partially, as there exist direct peer<strong>in</strong>g arrangements<br />

among the network operators, and as the academic networks are connected to the rest of the world through<br />

NORDUNET. F<strong>in</strong>land has one of the four Internet root servers that are located outside the US. The Internet<br />

traffic has roughly tripled annually <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade. There is currently no data available about<br />

the share of different protocols <strong>in</strong> the F<strong>in</strong>nish <strong>in</strong>ternet backbones.<br />

8.9.3.3 Ongo<strong>in</strong>g and planned broadband pilots<br />

A IPDC (IP datacast) DVB-T pilot was announced <strong>in</strong> December 2003 that will recruit about 500 pilot users <strong>in</strong><br />

the Hels<strong>in</strong>ki region. TeliaSonera F<strong>in</strong>land and Radiol<strong>in</strong>ja provide mobile access for protected TV-like services to<br />

the end-users. Broadcast firms MTV Oy, Nelonen (Channel Four F<strong>in</strong>land) and The F<strong>in</strong>nish Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Company will produce the content available for the pilot users. Digita will operate the IPDC service system and<br />

network. In this role it will manage the services and broadcast them on-air. Nokia will provide the IPDC specific<br />

equipment such as the term<strong>in</strong>als, which enable the devices to receive the broadcast signal. Technical IPDC tests<br />

have been go<strong>in</strong>g on s<strong>in</strong>ce September 2002, provid<strong>in</strong>g up to 12 Mbps to mobile term<strong>in</strong>als. 273<br />

Nokia is also actively <strong>in</strong>volved with DVB-X that tries to adapt DVB-T to small mobile devices. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

Nokia, DVB-T is well suited for broadcasts that can be received at users mov<strong>in</strong>g at speeds of up to 170 km/h,<br />

but DVB-X may be needed for battery operated devices. 274 Nokia is also <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> WiMAX 802.16 wireless<br />

broadband, and it announced <strong>in</strong> May 2005 that it will deliver its first 4G network to Kuwait later this year.<br />

WiMAX is currently be<strong>in</strong>g launched by several operators <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land, us<strong>in</strong>g . Currently the technology providers<br />

claim that WiFi, 3G, and WiMAX will complement each other.<br />

The deployment of wireless local area networks has also generated a new open model for wireless broadband<br />

access. For example, SparkNet <strong>in</strong> the Turku are now shares about 500 WiFi base stations among some 5000<br />

users. The promoters of SparkNet claim that the current base stations could provide access for about 100.000<br />

users. This has been achieved with simply open<strong>in</strong>g access to exist<strong>in</strong>g base stations to the members of SparkNet,<br />

with m<strong>in</strong>imal additional <strong>in</strong>vestments. The concept is now be<strong>in</strong>g extended as OpenSpark that will be free for all<br />

users. As part of the OpenSpark project, SparkNet will give free base stations to about 350 households, on the<br />

condition that they will be kept open for any users. About 100 base stations will be given to associations, and<br />

about 60 will be <strong>in</strong>stalled <strong>in</strong> public locations. The base stations are funded by the city council of Turku.<br />

271<br />

At the same time, some <strong>in</strong>terviewed operators <strong>in</strong>tended to make backbone <strong>in</strong>vestments of about 50 million euros dur<strong>in</strong>g the next four<br />

years.<br />

272<br />

The last calculation assumes that the material and <strong>in</strong>stallation costs for optical fibre are similar to copper (about 100 euros per<br />

connection), and that the term<strong>in</strong>al equipment and other active components are about 700 euros.<br />

273<br />

IP Datacast Forum (2002): IP Datacast test network launched <strong>in</strong> Hels<strong>in</strong>ki. http://ipdc-forum.org/news/press-release-2.htm<br />

274<br />

Henriksson, J. DVB-X. DVB Scene 05, March 2003. http://www.dvb.org/documents/newsletters/DVB-SCENE-05.pdf


8.10 France<br />

8.10.1 Introduction<br />

Page 181 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

France is a republic of 22 regions and subdivided <strong>in</strong>to 96 “départements” and encompasses a geographic area of<br />

547,030 square kilometres (+ a few “Départements et Territoires d’Outremer (overseas)” situated all over the<br />

world). The population numbers more than sixty four million people (60,424,213 <strong>in</strong> July 2004), about 10 million<br />

of whom live <strong>in</strong> the capital, Paris. Despite urban concentration, rural areas rema<strong>in</strong> important with around 14<br />

million people.<br />

8.10.2 The broadband market<br />

11 278 000 households had a PC <strong>in</strong> the third quarter of 2004, represent<strong>in</strong>g 45.1% of all households (source<br />

Mediametrie), and 44 million mobile phone subscriptions existed, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a 75% penetration rate. 24<br />

580 000 French person above 11 years had used the Internet <strong>in</strong> March 2005. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess-to-consumer e-commerce<br />

is projected to amount to 6,7 bn € <strong>in</strong> 2005, a progression of 36.7 %, on the back of 10.617.000 Internet<br />

customers (source : Benchmark Group, updated 23/03/2005).<br />

As of 30 September 2004 (Figure 63), there were 5.8 million dial-up connections 275 , and 5.5 million high-speed<br />

Internet connections for a total of 11.3 million 276 . The number of high-speed accesses cont<strong>in</strong>ued to rise by close<br />

to 12% per quarter, while the number of dial-up accesses Internet decl<strong>in</strong>ed aga<strong>in</strong> this quarter, by about 6.7%.<br />

With prices fall<strong>in</strong>g, Internet Access Providers’ sales reached €602 million <strong>in</strong> the third quarter, decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1.8%<br />

over the previous quarter, and return<strong>in</strong>g to first quarter levels. The decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> sales generated by dial-up access<br />

accelerated (-13.2%), and was not entirely compensated by the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sales generated by high-speed access<br />

(+3.9%). In addition to price decreases, this result is probably due to the unfavourable seasonal effect of the<br />

summer months.<br />

Figure 63: Internet Access <strong>in</strong> France<br />

The number of high-speed accesses grew (Table 27) by 80% from 3.6 millions on 1 st January 2004 to 6,1 million<br />

at the end of 2004 277 . High-speed Internet is provided by xDSL (primarily ADSL), cable, wireless local loop<br />

(WLL), fiber optics and satellite. Most XDSL and cable subscriptions are purchased by residential customers<br />

whereas the other technologies target bus<strong>in</strong>ess customers.<br />

The number of XDSL l<strong>in</strong>es rose 12.9% <strong>in</strong> the third quarter 2004, for growth equall<strong>in</strong>g that of the second quarter.<br />

Sales reflected significant decreases <strong>in</strong> prices, and rose by just 4.4%. The number of high-speed Internet<br />

accesses via cable grew regularly, but more slowly (+1.8%).<br />

275 he number of dial-up accesses might be slightly over reported: <strong>in</strong> particular, the concept of effective activity for dial-up access us<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

"free access account" and calls paid by the m<strong>in</strong>ute can sometimes be difficult to calculate.<br />

276 http://www.art-telecom.fr/observatoire/marche<strong>in</strong>ternet/<strong>in</strong>dex-mar-<strong>in</strong>ter0304-eng.htm<br />

277 http://www.journaldunet.com/cc/02_equipement/equip_hautdebit_fr.shtml


Table 27: Growth of high-speed access<br />

Page 182 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

For the third year <strong>in</strong> a row, the French market grew by close to 100% <strong>in</strong> 2004. As of 1st January 2005, with 6.1<br />

million ADSL l<strong>in</strong>es, France is one of the leaders among European countries, both for the number of ADSL<br />

accesses and penetration rate 278 . Close to one out of every four French households now has high-speed Internet<br />

access.<br />

Retail prices for high-speed Internet access decl<strong>in</strong>ed significantly <strong>in</strong> 2004 and are currently among the lowest <strong>in</strong><br />

Europe. At the same time, players <strong>in</strong>novated and diversified their services, offer<strong>in</strong>g voice over IP, unlimited<br />

telephone and ADSL packages, audiovisual stream<strong>in</strong>g, videophone and broadband us<strong>in</strong>g the ADSL 2+<br />

technology, with speeds of over 10 Mbit/s.<br />

8.10.2.1 Unbundled l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

Unbundl<strong>in</strong>g was officially launched <strong>in</strong> 2001, with the commercial phase start<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2002, and the first<br />

geographic deployments <strong>in</strong> 2003. In 2004, unbundl<strong>in</strong>g has taken off.. There are two possibilities for<br />

unbundl<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

• Partial unbundl<strong>in</strong>g allows alternative operator to propose a high bit-rate service xDSL on the band of<br />

high frequencies of telephone l<strong>in</strong>e, while France Telecom cont<strong>in</strong>ues to deliver the telephony service on<br />

the low band. The customer preserves the telephone subscription of France Telecom.<br />

• Full unbundl<strong>in</strong>g allows alternative operators to l<strong>in</strong>k the entire l<strong>in</strong>e to its own equipments, and furnish at<br />

once the telephony and the high bit-rate. There is no more subscription to France Telecom <strong>in</strong> case of<br />

total unbundl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

There are several companies who provide unbundled services like Altitude Telecom, Axione, Bretagne Telecom,<br />

Cegetel, Cambio, Colt, Dauph<strong>in</strong>e Telecom, Easynet, Free Telecom, Neuf Telecom, Outermer Telecom, Pacwan,<br />

Telecom Italia France, Tiscali France 279 .<br />

Until the end of 2003, wholesale broadband offers provided by France Telecom at the regional or departmental<br />

level were used very little. Operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) primarily used the IP/ADSL offer,<br />

delivered to a national collection po<strong>in</strong>t located <strong>in</strong> the Paris region, regardless of their subscribers’ location. The<br />

operational and pric<strong>in</strong>g conditions of the ADSL Connect offer, delivered at the department or regional level,<br />

were improved <strong>in</strong> late 2003. In early 2004, France Telecom also <strong>in</strong>troduced its IP/ADSL Regional offer.<br />

278 http://www.art-telecom.fr/observatoire/blr/janvier05/deg170105.pdf<br />

279 http://www.art-telecom.fr/telecom/faq/degroup.htm#25


Page 183 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In 2004, most alternative operators used these regional wholesale offers purchased from France Telecom to<br />

provide a major share of their retail offers. As of 1 January 2005, France Telecom sold almost one million highspeed<br />

accesses at the regional level to alternative operators. Regional offers represented about 6% of accesses <strong>in</strong><br />

early 2004, ris<strong>in</strong>g to around 20% at the start of 2005.<br />

By 1 January 2005, France Telecom had delivered 893 sites to unbundl<strong>in</strong>g operators, represent<strong>in</strong>g coverage of<br />

over 50% of the population. Currently, just six departments do not have a s<strong>in</strong>gle unbundled site. All of the<br />

overseas departments have at least one unbundled site.<br />

A disparity appeared between the competitive unbundled areas and areas <strong>in</strong> which France Telecom has a de<br />

facto monopoly over the networks. In the latter areas, retail prices are generally higher, and speeds lower.<br />

As a result, on 1 January 2005, there were 1 590 707 unbundled l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> France, of which 1 495 517 l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />

partially unbundled and 95 190 l<strong>in</strong>es were fully unbundled. The number of unbundled l<strong>in</strong>e at 1 st January 2005<br />

was almost six times higher than on 1st January 2004 (0.27 million). The rate of growth accelerated dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

year, with 500 000 new l<strong>in</strong>es dur<strong>in</strong>g the last three months alone. This br<strong>in</strong>gs the share of unbundled accesses up<br />

from 10% of ADSL accesses to 25% <strong>in</strong> one year, but full unbundl<strong>in</strong>g affects just 0.5% of telephone l<strong>in</strong>es, and<br />

less than 2% of high-speed accesses. However, France ranks second <strong>in</strong> Europe for the number of unbundled<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es, beh<strong>in</strong>d Germany, and first if we consider just the number of unbundled l<strong>in</strong>es used to provide high-speed<br />

Internet access.<br />

Free was the first <strong>in</strong>ternet access provider (ISP) to propose offers through his «Freebox » at a competitive price<br />

with a unlimited calls to all fixed telephones and calls towards French mobiles cheaper than France Telecom.<br />

The current offer by Free (ADSL 2+) <strong>in</strong> unbundled areas is up to 20 Mbs downstream and 1Mbs upstream and<br />

<strong>in</strong> non-unbundled areas 10 Mbs downstream and 320 Kbs upstream for 30 € per month (free connection)<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g access to telephony and digital television.<br />

Triple-play offers (Internet, Telephone and TV) appeared as early as the fall of 2003. Also, the historic operator<br />

signed an agreement with TPS for launch<strong>in</strong>g of a TV ADSL: « my l<strong>in</strong>e-TV » is available on Lyon s<strong>in</strong>ce that<br />

month. It is <strong>in</strong> launch<strong>in</strong>g phase on the Paris region. In triple-play, one can use each of the three “plays”<br />

(services) at the same time because they are attributed as part of the band-width. 2 Mbit/s are reserved to<br />

Internet, but it can become more. In theory, if the television is turned off, the total 5.5 Mbit/s can be used for the<br />

Internet. In practice, that depends on proximity of the DSLAM 280 , i.e. the central telephone switch. But <strong>in</strong> France<br />

Telecom’s service, the flows are stationary: 2 Mbit/s are allocated to the telephone, 2 to Internet and 4 to the<br />

television. It is important to note that it is not necessary to turn on one’s PC <strong>in</strong> order to telephone or watch<br />

television. Only the modem must be on.<br />

280 Digital Subscriber L<strong>in</strong>e Access Multiplexer<br />

Table 28


Page 184 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Other ISPs attempt also to fill the gap by propos<strong>in</strong>g unlimited telephony without the service TV by ADSL as<br />

Club Internet or Alice ADSL. Simultaneously the consumers have the possibility to benefit from the unbundl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of their telephone l<strong>in</strong>e, which means the disappearance of the monopoly of France Telecom to propose telephone<br />

services. The rivals of Wanadoo, France Telecom's <strong>in</strong>ternet service provider, won 40% of the retail market and<br />

unbundled local loop operators (ULL) took around 10% of the wholesale market.<br />

A number of rural zones rema<strong>in</strong> lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the advantages of the cable or ADSL. There, only WiMax or satellite<br />

allow to bypass 56k-modem connection, but these costly solutions represent less than 1% of the market and<br />

stagnate.<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g fiber-to-the-home (FTTH), the town of Pau 281 has developed a local <strong>in</strong>itiative aim<strong>in</strong>g at the<br />

deployment of a fibre optic access network for (155.000 people) complemented with a Wi-Fi system. End-toend<br />

100Mbs sysmetric connection will be provided to “most” customers. In Paris, a new operator CitéFibre 282<br />

(Nicom<strong>in</strong>vest) has announced the commercialisation of 100Mbs symetric FTTH services (they have obta<strong>in</strong>ed an<br />

agreement to use Paris sewage) for 70 € per month before the summer 2005.<br />

8.10.3 Broadband policy 283<br />

The fall <strong>in</strong> wholesale prices (options 3 and 5) at the end of 2003, as well as tariffs be<strong>in</strong>g differentiated as a<br />

function of production costs, allows the substantial productivity ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the sector to be passed on to the enduser,<br />

while still encourag<strong>in</strong>g alternative operators and France Telecom to persist with geographical rollout of<br />

ADSL.<br />

Broadband challenges<br />

• Multi-service offers: development of <strong>in</strong>novative "double or triple play" offers on ADSL (bundl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

access to broadband Internet, TV on ADSL and telephony) will likely lead to comprehensive changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> the broadband market. It will also raise complex issues for the regulator, notably <strong>in</strong> terms of the<br />

potential leverage provided by content access.<br />

• Service quality : improv<strong>in</strong>g unbundl<strong>in</strong>g service quality to ensure that it is comparable to that of France<br />

Telecom's wholesale and retail offers is a challenge for the development of broadband and, particularly,<br />

of full unbundl<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Coverage: facilitat<strong>in</strong>g development of ADSL <strong>in</strong> less densely populated areas without any price<br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>ation compared to densely populated urban areas and support<strong>in</strong>g local authority efforts <strong>in</strong><br />

regional digital development. The digital economy law, proclaimed <strong>in</strong> the summer of 2004, authorises<br />

local authorities to <strong>in</strong>tervene <strong>in</strong> the telecommunications field, <strong>in</strong> particular to reduce disparities <strong>in</strong><br />

coverage and competition.<br />

• Implementation of the new regulatory framework: the outcome of the market analyses should ensure<br />

that there are France Telecom’s wholesale offers and regulation mechanisms commensurate with the<br />

challenges and expectations of the sector and end-users.<br />

Renewed <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> use of the abandoned WLL frequencies <strong>in</strong> the 3.5 GHz band to operate services based on<br />

Wimax wireless technology raises important challenges <strong>in</strong> terms of competition, <strong>in</strong>novation and regional<br />

development. The regulator <strong>in</strong>tends to assess the situation by launch<strong>in</strong>g a call for comments.<br />

Voice over IP constitutes a radical breakthrough <strong>in</strong> the traditional value cha<strong>in</strong> of voice telephony by do<strong>in</strong>g away<br />

with the cost constra<strong>in</strong>ts l<strong>in</strong>ked to time and distance. The question is whether this development will eventually<br />

lead to a more balanced breakdown of fixed and mobile use.<br />

8.10.4 Conclusion<br />

Although France had a slow start <strong>in</strong> IT and <strong>in</strong>ternet penetration, evolution over the years 2003/4 has placed it <strong>in</strong><br />

a good position as far as unbundl<strong>in</strong>g and penetration is concerned. A very aggressive policy from an alternative<br />

ISP deliver<strong>in</strong>g triple play over ADSL has triggered a fast reaction from France Telecom and other operators.<br />

Cable operators keep a small share of Internet access (2% households, 10% connections), although it is<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Fibre optics solutions start appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> very few places.<br />

281 http://eco.agglo-pau.fr/Initiatives/PBC/presentation/presentation1.htm<br />

282 http://www.nicom<strong>in</strong>vest.com/fr/participation/citefibre.html<br />

283 http://www.art-telecom.fr/eng/<strong>in</strong>dex.htm


8.11 Germany<br />

8.11.1 Introduction<br />

Page 185 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The Federal Republic of Germany covers an area of about 357,000 square kilometers. The furthest distance from<br />

north to south as the crow flies is 876 kilometers, from west to east 640 kilometers. The total length of the<br />

country’s borders is 3,758 kilometers. Germany has a population of about 83 million (about 3.4 million of whom<br />

live <strong>in</strong> the capital Berl<strong>in</strong>) the largest <strong>in</strong> Europe after the Russian Federation, followed by the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

and France. Germany is a Federal Republic comprised of 16 States.” 284 Ma<strong>in</strong> sources for <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />

broadband <strong>in</strong> Germany are BITKOM 285 , BMBF 286 , DFN 287 and DIW 288 .<br />

8.11.2 The broadband market<br />

Figure 64: Broadband access per 100 households 2004 <strong>in</strong> Germany compared to other<br />

European countries, Japan and USA.<br />

8.11.2.1 Key Applications<br />

In 2004, 134 experts from the German economy and public sector, as well as 3,036 laypeople, were <strong>in</strong>terviewed<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g future broadband use. 289 While past and current <strong>in</strong>ternet usage has been dom<strong>in</strong>ated by <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

(e.g., news and product research) and communication services (e.g., chatt<strong>in</strong>g and e-mail), the experts predict a<br />

shift of use will take place <strong>in</strong> the years 2007 to 2010 (Table 29). The use of e-commerce (e.g., on-l<strong>in</strong>e shopp<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

and enterta<strong>in</strong>ment content (e.g., onl<strong>in</strong>e games) will <strong>in</strong>crease from 41% to 49%; the use of <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

communication will decrease from 59% to 51%. The majority of the experts (72%) agree that a better selection<br />

of attractive broadband content substantially contributes to a stronger spread<strong>in</strong>g of the broadband Internet.<br />

284 EREC (European Renewable Energy Council) (2004). “Renewable Energy Policy Review Germany.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: www.erecrenewables.org/documents/RES_<strong>in</strong>_EUandCC/<br />

Policy_reviews/EU_15/Germany_policy_f<strong>in</strong>al.pdf [22.04.04]<br />

285 BITKOM -Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien e.V. (2005). “Daten zur<br />

Informationsgesellschaft. ” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://www.breitband<strong>in</strong>itiative.de/site/upload/presse/DatenzurInformationsgesellschaft2005.pdf [22.3.04]<br />

286 Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry of Education and Research (2004). “Ziele und Aufgaben..” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.bmwi.de/de/90.php<br />

[16.3.04]<br />

287 Deutsches Forschungsnetz (DFN) e. V. (2004). “Gigabit-Wissenschaftsnetz (G-WiN).“ [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.dfn.de<br />

[22.3.04].<br />

288 DIW Berl<strong>in</strong> (2004). “ DIW Berl<strong>in</strong>.“ [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.diw.de/english/das<strong>in</strong>stitut/abteilungen/iut/<strong>in</strong>dex.html [16.3.04]<br />

289 Wirtz, B.W., Schmidt-Holtz, R. & Beaujean, R. (2004). “Studie Deutschland Onl<strong>in</strong>e 2”, . [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.studie-<br />

deutschland-onl<strong>in</strong>e.de/


Page 186 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 65: Broadband growth and forecast for Germany both by absolute numbers per 100 households and<br />

growth percentages. 290<br />

Broadband content<br />

Video-on-Demand<br />

Onl<strong>in</strong>e games<br />

E-Commerce<br />

Broadband applications<br />

Future potential [%]<br />

high very high<br />

Education 18.2 ---<br />

Information 36.4 4.5<br />

Infota<strong>in</strong>ment 50.0 4.5<br />

Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment 45.5 45.5<br />

Documentaries and educational video 22.7 ---<br />

Sports 40.9 18.2<br />

Movies 68.3 13.6<br />

Adult content/services 31.8 59.2<br />

Strategy 25.0 20.0<br />

Role-play<strong>in</strong>g 30.0 25.0<br />

Sports 47.4 15.8<br />

Adventure 55.0 15.0<br />

Action 70.0 20.0<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial services 37.1 7.4<br />

DVD/CD 33.3 18.5<br />

Computers/ Computer accessories 44.4 11.1<br />

Adult goods 40.7 22.2<br />

Travel 33.3 37.0<br />

Table 29: The experts predictions of the future importance of Broadband applications for 2007 to 2010.<br />

290 BITKOM -Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien e.V. (2005). “Daten zur<br />

Informationsgesellschaft.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.kibnet.de/fix/doc/BITKOM_Daten_zur_Informationsgesellschaft_2004.2.pdf<br />

[22.3.05]


Page 187 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Table 30 <strong>in</strong>forms additionally on success factors of E-commerce from the perspective of experts and laypeople.<br />

Expert rat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Laypeople rat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Factors of E-commerce success<br />

8.11.2.2 Technical <strong>in</strong>frastructure 291<br />

Relevance [%]<br />

high very high<br />

Higher experience value of on-l<strong>in</strong>e shopp<strong>in</strong>g 33.3 18.5<br />

Faster product search and price comparison 44.4 14.8<br />

Comfortable use of shopp<strong>in</strong>g tools (Configurator application) 37.1 25.9<br />

Immediate distribution of digital products 51.9 25.9<br />

Smaller load times for shopp<strong>in</strong>g websites 55.6 29.5<br />

Low prices 38.8 44.5<br />

Product <strong>in</strong>formation 36.3 42.1<br />

Large variety of products 41.7 39.3<br />

Quality of website 43.0 38.6<br />

Reputation and reliability 26.9 65.8<br />

Table 30: Success factors of E-commerce.<br />

The technology with the widest penetration <strong>in</strong> Germany is DSL. Thus over 90% of all households are or can be<br />

connected to DSL based on the available <strong>in</strong>frastructure and 97% 292 of all exist<strong>in</strong>g broadband access l<strong>in</strong>es are<br />

based on DSL.<br />

The cable TV network is the second largest German communication network <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g direct access to the end<br />

user. 53% of all households are connected, while 76% could be connected. However, compared to DSL cable<br />

TV is only of m<strong>in</strong>or importance, as is also evident from figure 1. It is estimated that to use cable TV as<br />

broadband access network very high <strong>in</strong>vestments (about 9 billion €) would be required. In view of the capacity<br />

of DSL an upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of cable TV to <strong>in</strong>teractive broadband communication networks can only be justified if the<br />

cable TV network will be digitalised all over the country to supply more TV programs, <strong>in</strong>teractive TV or voice<br />

over IP.<br />

Internet access on the basis of Powerl<strong>in</strong>e Communications (PLC) is of m<strong>in</strong>or importance. There are still<br />

technical problems to be solved and even if these obstacles are elim<strong>in</strong>ated PLC is expected to fill a market niche<br />

only, particular <strong>in</strong>side houses. With regard to broadband via satellite it is estimated that this technology will be<br />

used only <strong>in</strong> those areas where the above technologies are not available. Other technologies as UMTS, WiMax<br />

and FTTH are not used by private households at present, but are to a small extent relevant for companies (about<br />

4% 293 ).<br />

An exception is Germany’s National Research and Education Network called “DFN – Deutsches<br />

Forschungsnetz 294 . The DFN provides a high-performance <strong>in</strong>frastructure for the German research and education<br />

community. DFN connects universities and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions and supports the development of <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

applications as part of the Internet 2 community <strong>in</strong> Germany. The national backbone of DFN is the G-WiN<br />

(Gigabit research net). G-WiN is an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of the world-wide community of research and education<br />

networks. Based on contracts and peer<strong>in</strong>g agreements G-WiN is connected to the global <strong>in</strong>ternet as well.<br />

DFN <strong>in</strong>ternet service provides high-performance access to the world-wide <strong>in</strong>ternet as well as connectivity to the<br />

North American and European scientific networks ABILENE (2.5 Gbit/s) and GÉANT (10 Gbit/s). The G-WiN<br />

allows services to be connected with rates from 0.128 Mbit/s up to 2.4 Gbit/s. The transport platform of G-WiN<br />

291<br />

Preissl, B.; Lattemann, C., Köhler, T., Ebner, G.; Rentmeister, J. (2004). „Studie für die Deutsche Telekom AG - Rahmenbed<strong>in</strong>gungen<br />

für e<strong>in</strong>e Breitbandoffensive <strong>in</strong> Deutschland“, DIW-Berl<strong>in</strong>, [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://www.diw.de/deutsch/produkte/publikationen/gutachten/docs/diw_rahmen_Breitbandoff200401.pdf<br />

292<br />

ZEW (Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH) (2005). „Benchmark „Internationale Telekommunikationsmärkte““,<br />

[Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.founders.de/Studien/Benchmark2.pdf<br />

293<br />

Statistisches Bundesamt (2004). “Informationstechnologie <strong>in</strong> Unternehmen und Haushalten.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://www.destatis.de/<strong>in</strong>formationsgesellschaft/d_home.htm<br />

294<br />

Deutsches Forschungsnetz (DFN) e. V. (2004). “Gigabit-Wissenschaftsnetz (G-WiN).“ [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.dfn.de<br />

[22.3.04].


Page 188 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

uses the synchronous and plesiochronous digital hierarchy and is based on wavelength multiplex<strong>in</strong>g (WDM).<br />

This technology allows <strong>in</strong> addition to the standard services of the DFN-Vere<strong>in</strong> also the design of special<br />

solutions like private networks or other transport structures.” In addition to a multitude of public organisations,<br />

particularly universities and research <strong>in</strong>stitutes and commercial enterprises like T-Systems, Scher<strong>in</strong>g or the<br />

Spr<strong>in</strong>ger publish<strong>in</strong>g house are connected to the DFN. In 2003 DFN was used by 760 organisations and end<br />

users. The complete data volume tranported by G-WiN summed up to about 1.198 TByte.<br />

The various technologies available are offered by many providers. Here the most important ones are 295 , 296, 297 :<br />

• DSL: Deutsche Telekom, Faventia, NGI, Lycos, GMX, 1XNET, Avego, 1click2, 1&1 Internet AG,<br />

Arcor AG & Co. KG, Freenet.de AG, CMO, Schlund + Partner AG, Strato Medien AG<br />

• Cable: Wikom Elektrik GmbH, ish GmbH & Co. KG, Kabel Deutschland Vertrieb und Service GmbH<br />

& Co. KG, Iesy Hessen GmbH & Co. KG, Kabel Baden-Württemberg GmbH & Co. KG, Bosch<br />

Breitbandnetze GmbH, Kabelfernsehen München ServiCenter GmbH & Co.KG, ddkom - Die Dresdner<br />

Telekommunikationsgesellschaft mbH, ewt GmbH, km3 teledienst GmbH, komro GmbH<br />

• WLAN: T-Mobile/T-Com, Eurospot, Airnyx, AOL, GlobalAirNet, M3-Connect, Vodafone, Berl<strong>in</strong>Net,<br />

Personal WLAN, HH@Work, NetCheckIn, Spektrum, ISIS Multimedia<br />

• SDSL: manCityNet, Easynet, flat2surf, VIA NET.WORKS, ISR, Claranet, ecore, Bisp<strong>in</strong>g & Bisp<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

MDl<strong>in</strong>k, complete, IN-Berl<strong>in</strong>, K-DSL<br />

• PLC: Vype GmbH, EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG, RRS Ross-Router-Systems, MAnet<br />

GmbH, Witte Bürotechnik GmbH, HomePlug Powerl<strong>in</strong>e Alliance, Stadtwerke Neustrelitz GmbH etc.<br />

8.11.3 Broadband policy 298<br />

With regard to the importance of <strong>in</strong>formation and communication technology an “Information Society Germany<br />

2006” strategy was adopted by the Federal Government. It stresses activities on: a digital economy aimed at<br />

growth and competitiveness, education, research and equal opportunities, e-government, security and confidence<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Internet and e-health. An overview on specific objectives of the “Information Society Germany 2006”<br />

programme is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the annex.<br />

8.11.4 Conclusion 299<br />

It appears that DSL will rema<strong>in</strong> the dom<strong>in</strong>ant broadband access technology <strong>in</strong> the next years. Other access<br />

technologies require high <strong>in</strong>vestments or elim<strong>in</strong>ation of technical obstacles to be of wide use. Competition with<br />

regard to the establishment of alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructures would be helpful to <strong>in</strong>crease the spread of broadband<br />

connections. Such a competition could be possible if cable TV owners could come to an arrangement and would<br />

be will<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>ance the necessary <strong>in</strong>vestments. Such <strong>in</strong>vestments would not only assure a wider availability of<br />

broadband access but also susta<strong>in</strong>ability of networks as one may expect that <strong>in</strong> future a higher bandwidth is<br />

demanded than at present. Additionally it appears necessary to take care of development and supply of<br />

broadband applications that are adapted to the needs of society as listed <strong>in</strong> the Federal Government programme<br />

“Information Society Germany 2006”.<br />

295 A section on pric<strong>in</strong>g will be supplied <strong>in</strong> another update of this text.<br />

296 http://www.onl<strong>in</strong>ekosten.de<br />

297 http://www.teletarif.de<br />

298 Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry of Education and Research / Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry of Economics and Labour (2004). „Information Society Germany 2006“,<br />

Action Programme by the Federal Government, Berl<strong>in</strong>, [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

htttp://www.bmwa.bund.de/Redaktion/Inhalte/Downloads/<strong>in</strong>formation-society-2006,property=pdf.pdf<br />

299 Preissl, B.; Lattemann, C., Köhler, T., Ebner, G.; Rentmeister, J. (2004). „Studie für die Deutsche Telekom AG - Rahmenbed<strong>in</strong>gungen<br />

für e<strong>in</strong>e Breitbandoffensive <strong>in</strong> Deutschland“, DIW-Berl<strong>in</strong>, [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://www.diw.de/deutsch/produkte/publikationen/gutachten/docs/diw_rahmen_Breitbandoff200401.pdf


Page 189 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Table 31: Specific objectives of the “Information Society Germany 2006” programme.


Page 190 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Table 3 cont<strong>in</strong>ued: Specific objectives of the “Information Society Germany 2006” programme.


8.12 Greece<br />

Page 191 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The fixed <strong>in</strong>cumbent rema<strong>in</strong>s dom<strong>in</strong>ant on the fixed markets. The mobile penetration rate has reached 93% of<br />

the population and the development of the mobile market is progress<strong>in</strong>g well due to good competition <strong>in</strong> place.<br />

Despite recent positive signs, broadband access is one of the major problems <strong>in</strong> the electronic communications<br />

markets <strong>in</strong> Greece. As of July 2004, the penetration rate for retail broadband access is the lowest among the<br />

15 EU Member States, stand<strong>in</strong>g at only 0.24%.<br />

The fixed <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator <strong>in</strong> Greece also ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s its dom<strong>in</strong>ant position as the access network<br />

provider <strong>in</strong> the fixed market. OTE, the <strong>in</strong>cumbent, offers both retail and wholesale DSL <strong>in</strong> Greece. It began<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g commercial DSL <strong>in</strong> April 2003. Its ma<strong>in</strong> competitor, Tellas, is a JV between the Greek Public Power<br />

Corporation (PPC) and the Italian operator WIND. Forthnet and Vivodi are the other operators, which offer<br />

DSL services <strong>in</strong> the country.<br />

In view of the absence of a major cable operator <strong>in</strong> Greece, the only fixed network which has started<br />

compet<strong>in</strong>g with the <strong>in</strong>cumbent is that of the national power enterprise. The Greek public utilities are keen to<br />

exploit the new opportunities offered by the deregulation <strong>in</strong> the market. State power, transport and water<br />

companies have announced plans to enter <strong>in</strong>to telecom market that will <strong>in</strong>stall new networks for fixed l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

telephony.<br />

The ICT market is relatively new <strong>in</strong> the Greek economy and therefore there is potential for new bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

opportunities. Though penetration is very low, the trend of the ICT sector is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the EU trend.<br />

<strong>Number</strong> of subscribers<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

Broadband Take-up by Technology GREECE<br />

January 2003 July 2003 January 2004<br />

Figure 66: Broadband take-up <strong>in</strong> Greece<br />

DSL<br />

Total l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

As of 2004, there were only 26 000 broadband subscribers <strong>in</strong> Greece. In 2002, the Greek Broadband Taskforce<br />

was founded to draft the national broadband strategy. However, due to non-existent competition the penetration<br />

of broadband is still very limited. Nevertheless, there are some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g projects launched to promote the use<br />

of broadband access, recently:<br />

• The SYZEFXIS project aims to provide broadband access to the entire population of public build<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g adm<strong>in</strong>istration, schools, hospitals, local adm<strong>in</strong>istrations, etc), on the basis of demand<br />

aggregation. It is a €71.5 million project, currently <strong>in</strong> the tender<strong>in</strong>g process. Satellite <strong>in</strong>frastructure will<br />

be used to connect remote public adm<strong>in</strong>istration sites.<br />

• SMEs can receive fund<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>stallation costs and service costs for the creation of wireless<br />

hotspots via ADSL, LMDS and satellite l<strong>in</strong>k technologies.<br />

Other


8.13 Hungary<br />

8.13.1 Introduction<br />

Page 192 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In 2003, Hungary has a PPP-adjusted GDP of 15 200 US $ per capita which is considerably lower than the EU<br />

average of 27 300 US $ and OECD Europe (23 100 US $). 300 It is at the end of the low middle <strong>in</strong>come group<br />

with a score of 49 (a high <strong>in</strong>come country has a score of 100). 301 Hungary had a population of 10.1 million and a<br />

population density of 110 <strong>in</strong> 2001. More than 35% of the population live <strong>in</strong> rural areas.<br />

8.13.2 Demand<br />

A study commissioned 302 by the m<strong>in</strong>istry of Informatics and Communications shows that Hungary significantly<br />

lacks beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> terms of BB penetration and uptake rates. On a more positive note, the ratio between dial-up and<br />

BB users is almost even with BB access to account for nearly 60% by the end of 2006. Other positives trends<br />

relate to the decrease <strong>in</strong> prices for telecommunications services (on a very high level though) and a higher<br />

spend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>in</strong>focom services by end users and companies.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the OECD, Hungary ranks 23 rd with a BB penetration rate of 3.6% per 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants. 303 For July<br />

2004, the EU reports a fixed BB penetration rate of 2.2%, considerably lower than the EU 25 average of 6.5%. 304<br />

In absolute figures, <strong>in</strong> July 2004 there were 222 979 fixed BB l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> Hungary. 305 While Hungary has a low<br />

penetration rate <strong>in</strong> comparison with other developed countries, recent growth rates are very high, surpass<strong>in</strong>g<br />

growth rates of Portugal for <strong>in</strong>stance. 306 As for the economic value of the Hungarian communications market <strong>in</strong><br />

a European perspective, Hungary accounts for 1.3% of the enlarged EU electronic communications market and<br />

is – after Poland – the second biggest market of the new MS. 307<br />

Figure 67: Broadband availability and town size 308<br />

In 2003, 45% of all households were able to get DSL BB access services. 309 There is a big gap between bigger<br />

and smaller cities. IHM reports that <strong>in</strong> cities with less than 10 000 <strong>in</strong>habitants BB coverage is only 4% (Figure<br />

67).<br />

DSL was overtak<strong>in</strong>g cable as lead<strong>in</strong>g access technology <strong>in</strong> 2003 and accounted for 142 261 BB l<strong>in</strong>es (of a total<br />

of 222 979). Non-DSL technologies (i.e. cable) accounted for 80718 l<strong>in</strong>es. 310 IHM reports that ADSL was<br />

300<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/5/34244925.xls<br />

301<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/0/34256797.pdf<br />

302<br />

http://www.ihm.gov.hu/kutatasok/ihm_kutatasok/nszs2005 (<strong>in</strong> Hungarian). English summary available at<br />

http://en.ihm.gov.hu/pressreleases/pressreleases_20050420.html<br />

303<br />

http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,2340,en_2825_495656_2496764_1_1_1_1,00.html<br />

304<br />

EU Commission (2004) European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2004 (10th report), Annex 3 p. 72.<br />

305<br />

EU Commission (2004) Annex 3 p. 67.<br />

306<br />

IHM (2004), p. 22.<br />

307<br />

EU Commission (2004) Annex 3 p. 11.<br />

308<br />

IHM (2004), p. 23.<br />

309<br />

OECD (2004) The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas; p. 71. (OECD 2004). Available at<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf.


Page 193 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

available to some 40-50% of all households. 311 Cable television coverage now stands at 70%. However, not the<br />

whole cable <strong>in</strong>frastructure is capable to deliver bi-directional BB.<br />

Infrastructure competition between cable and DSL platforms has benefited the BB uptake of both private and<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess users. As <strong>in</strong> most other countries, FWA and Fibre are not serious concerns to the <strong>in</strong>cumbent. However,<br />

especially cable operator UPC is putt<strong>in</strong>g some pric<strong>in</strong>g pressure on the – fully privatised – <strong>in</strong>cumbent Matav,<br />

which now has a market share of 50% <strong>in</strong> the fixed BB retail l<strong>in</strong>e market, slightly lower than the EU average of<br />

56%. 312<br />

Especially <strong>in</strong>itial connection prices for full ULL rema<strong>in</strong> extremely high <strong>in</strong> Hungary. While the EU 22 average<br />

for the <strong>in</strong>itial connection is 75.67 €, <strong>in</strong> Hungary costs are 185.6 €. This <strong>in</strong>cludes a charge (148 €) whether the<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e is suitable for unbundl<strong>in</strong>g. 313 Costs of shared access is also extremely high. While the EU 21 average for the<br />

monthly rental is 3.3 €, it is 4.3 € <strong>in</strong> Hungary. Likewise average costs for connections <strong>in</strong> the EU 21are 79.6 €<br />

compared to 151.4 € <strong>in</strong> Hungary. 314 Especially when put <strong>in</strong> relation to the level of personal <strong>in</strong>come, high prices<br />

are a major barrier for mass uptake of BB. An ADSL BB user <strong>in</strong> Hungary needs to spend nearly ten times as<br />

much of his <strong>in</strong>come as a subscriber <strong>in</strong> Austria or Germany. 315<br />

Table 32 shows BB subscription prices <strong>in</strong> Hungary from October 2003 compiled by the OECD 316 . Compared<br />

with other countries BB access costs are very high.<br />

Company<br />

Access<br />

type<br />

Payment plan<br />

Speed<br />

(Kbps)<br />

Monthly<br />

charge<br />

($/PPP)<br />

Download<br />

Limit<br />

Installation<br />

charge<br />

($/PPP)<br />

Incumbent<br />

Matav ADSL ADSL Hobbi 384/64 85 Unlimited 256<br />

Matav ADSL ADSL OTTHON 512/128 102 Unlimited 256<br />

Vivendi ADSL V-Net ADSL 384 384/64 85 Unlimited 127<br />

Vivendi ADSL V-Net ADSL 512 512/128 94 Unlimited 170<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

Elender ADSL eDSL Expressz 384 384/64 84 Unlimited 0<br />

Elender ADSL eDSL Expressz 512 512/128 106 Unlimited 0<br />

Elender ADSL eDSL Irodai 768 768/128 213 Unlimited 0<br />

Elender ADSL eDSL Uzleti 1500 1500/368 641 Unlimited 0<br />

Alternative Infrastructure<br />

UPC Chello Cable Chello Classic 512/128 93 15 GB 0<br />

UPC Chello Cable Chello Plus 768/256 137 20 GB 33<br />

Table 32: BB Prices<br />

310 EU Commission (2004) Annex 3 p. 68.<br />

311 IHM (2004), p. 23.<br />

312 EU Commission (2004) Annex 3 p. 69.<br />

313 EU Commission (2004) Annex 3 p. 75.<br />

314 EU Commission (2004) Annex 3 p. 77.<br />

315 (MH (2004), p. 24.<br />

316 OECD (2004): Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Prices <strong>in</strong> the OECD, p. 31. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/17/32143101.pdf .


8.13.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 194 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Recently, the Hungarian M<strong>in</strong>istry of Informatics and Communications has commissioned a report on the<br />

national BB strategy which outl<strong>in</strong>es the ma<strong>in</strong> problems and proposes concrete measures as to how to address the<br />

identified barriers. 317 Prices for BB services are far too high for the mass market and there is a limited selection<br />

of services. Another serious barrier is that nearly 60% of Hungarians can be considered digitally illiterate. Other<br />

chief problems are the lack of relevant content and the unequal access of men and women. 318<br />

In a response to these key problems, ma<strong>in</strong> priorities relate to access, content and equality of opportunities.<br />

Proposed measures are of regulatory nature (e.g. regulation of competition and convergence), public policy<br />

measures (e.g. focussed <strong>in</strong>formational campaigns, demand aggregation) and f<strong>in</strong>ancial measures (e.g., support of<br />

the creation of broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure and community Internet access po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> villages, small settlements and<br />

<strong>in</strong> public education; tax benefits, fund<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>novative developments etc.)<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure, eHungary and "Közháló" are programs which provide for the establishment of BB<br />

end po<strong>in</strong>ts. 319 In addition, focus lies on connect<strong>in</strong>g schools (see also programmes mentioned below <strong>in</strong> the “User<br />

related” section). Hungary also has an extensive tele-centres programme for and has the highest density of Telecentres<br />

with<strong>in</strong> Europe.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g content, Hungary has put aside 17-18 billion HUF (70 million Euro) for its BB Public <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

program. 320 Around 70% are used for the “Intelligent School” program and e-education. In addition, the<br />

National Audiovisual Archives and National Digital Archives programmes are be<strong>in</strong>g funded with 2.4 billion<br />

HUF. Moreover, eLocalGovernment <strong>in</strong>itiatives aim to br<strong>in</strong>g the local governments on the Internet.<br />

As to users, various measures 321 are undertaken to make people more familiar with the Internet and the computer<br />

<strong>in</strong> general. For <strong>in</strong>stance, the m<strong>in</strong>istry of Communications and Informatics has launched an onl<strong>in</strong>e game <strong>in</strong> cooperation<br />

with the private sector to show users the benefits and potentials of BB services. The project was<br />

undertaken <strong>in</strong> close co-operation with the private sector. 322 Similarly, with a view to address user's attitude<br />

towards new technologies, public fund<strong>in</strong>g is available for the purchase of multi-media presentation equipment<br />

for secondary schools, support for the purchase of IT tools for the disabled, k<strong>in</strong>dergarten computer programs,<br />

multi-centre education IT system <strong>in</strong>stallations, satellite broadcast<strong>in</strong>g for secondary and vocational schools. 323<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, follow<strong>in</strong>g other countries’ examples, the establishment of a National Task Force is planned.<br />

317<br />

IHM (2004) Broadband Electronic Communications <strong>in</strong> Hungary http://www.ihm.gov.hu/data/20175/broadband_eng.pdf<br />

318<br />

http://www.ihm.gov.hu/kutatasok/ihm_kutatasok/nszs2005<br />

319<br />

http://en.ihm.gov.hu/programmes<br />

320<br />

http://en.ihm.gov.hu/pressreleases/pressreleases_20050420.html<br />

321<br />

IHM (2004), p.34-35.<br />

322<br />

http://en.ihm.gov.hu/pressreleases/pressreleases_20050426.html<br />

323 IHM (2004), 34.


8.14 Ireland<br />

8.14.1 Introduction<br />

Page 195 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In 2003, Ireland had the highest GDP per capita based on PPP (33 200 US $) of any country of the European<br />

Union (with the exception of Luxembourg). Ireland has a higher GDP per capita than the major 7 OECD<br />

average (32 000), far exceeds the OECD average (26 300) and the EU-15 (27 300). 324 Yet, when look<strong>in</strong>g at BB<br />

penetration and uptake figures Ireland has a penetration rate of 0.9% per capita compared to an EU average of<br />

6.1% and Denmark as a European BB leader with 12.7%. 325<br />

Forfas, a national advisory board <strong>in</strong> technology matters, produced a report on the current state of BB <strong>in</strong> Ireland<br />

and sets out some recommendation which address key obstacles <strong>in</strong> the further development of BB. 326 Section<br />

three on public policy summarises its key po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

8.14.2 The broadband market<br />

Ireland is considerably lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> terms of BB uptake and penetration rates. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the OECD,<br />

DSL was launched <strong>in</strong> Ireland only <strong>in</strong> May 2002 327 and by June 2003 DSL was available to around 52% of all<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es. 328 The projected weighed OECD average for 2003 is 76.3%. Forfas 329 attributes this lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d to a<br />

lack of growth <strong>in</strong> compet<strong>in</strong>g technologies (primarily cable) and a lack of competition and <strong>in</strong>novation with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

DSL market. Recommendations as to how to <strong>in</strong>crease competition and generally foster BB penetration and<br />

uptake are mentioned <strong>in</strong> section three.<br />

Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

By look<strong>in</strong>g at Table 33 it becomes evident why BB uptake <strong>in</strong> Ireland is so low. Transmission speeds generally<br />

do not exceed 512 kpbs and pric<strong>in</strong>g is extremely high. 330 Competition from FWA providers is only exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

few selected areas. One of the prime reasons why prices are high (and uptake consequently low) is that Ireland<br />

has a very high rural population. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the OECD, the rural population accounts for 40.7% while the<br />

OECD average is 22.9%. 331<br />

Another reason why prices are high relate to the lack of <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition. In 2003 only 4% of all Irish<br />

households are passed by BB capable cable networks. The weighed OECD average is 42%. 332 Hence, cable is<br />

not a serious competitor to DSL and Eircom.<br />

8.14.3 Broadband policy<br />

In order to <strong>in</strong>crease market transparency, the Irish government has established a website which enables users to<br />

see which broadband providers are <strong>in</strong> their area together with available offers and prices.333 In order to measure<br />

demand ex-ante (i.e. before mak<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>vestment) and reduce <strong>in</strong>vestment risk for <strong>in</strong>frastructure providers, the<br />

website <strong>in</strong>cludes a tool enabl<strong>in</strong>g potential users to register their <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> subscrib<strong>in</strong>g to a broadband service<br />

with only aggregate data be<strong>in</strong>g passed to service providers. 334<br />

324 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/5/34244925.xls<br />

325 BB data has been taken from the Commission Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper: Connect<strong>in</strong>g Europe at High Speed: National Broadband Strategies<br />

(May 2004).<br />

326 Forfas (2004) Broadband Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Study November 2004, p. iii.<br />

http://www.forfas.ie/publications/broadbandbenchmark<strong>in</strong>g041126/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

327 OECD (2004) The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas; p. 12. (OECD 2004). Available at<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf.<br />

328 Eircom the <strong>in</strong>cumbent has announced some plans to extend the reach of their BB network. OECD (2004) p. 26.<br />

329 Forfás is the national board responsible for provid<strong>in</strong>g policy advice to Government on enterprise, trade, science, technology and<br />

<strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong> Ireland. The primary function of Forfás is to promote economic development <strong>in</strong> Ireland. http://www.forfas.ie/.<br />

330 OECD (2004a) Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Prices <strong>in</strong> the OECD, June 2004; p. 34.<br />

http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,2546,en_2649_34223_32143102_119666_1_1_1,00.html<br />

331 OECD (2004), p. 71.<br />

332 OECD (2004), p. 13.<br />

333 http://www.broadband.gov.ie<br />

334 A similar <strong>in</strong>itiative has been undertaken by Eircom (and BT of the UK) which has also ma<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>s a Web site allow<strong>in</strong>g potential<br />

subscribers to register their <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> broadband access.


Company Access type Payment plan<br />

Incumbent<br />

Speed<br />

(Kbps)<br />

Page 196 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Monthly<br />

charge<br />

($)<br />

Download<br />

Limit<br />

Eircom ADSL i-stream (res) 512/128 54 4 GB 0<br />

Eircom ADSL i-stream (bus) 512/128 42 4 GB 197<br />

Eircom ADSL i-stream solo 512/128 106 6 GB 197<br />

Eircom ADSL i-stream enhanced 512/128 201 Unlimited 197<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

ESAT BT ADSL IOL BB 512 49 8 GB 89<br />

Alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

NTL CATV Always on 150 150 30 Unlimited 64<br />

NTL CATV Always on 600 600/150 39 Unlimited 64<br />

Amocom FWA Home 512/512 60 Unlimited 316<br />

Amocom FWA Bus<strong>in</strong>ess 3 1024/1024 238 Unlimited 316<br />

Irish BB FWA Ripwave Home 512/128 30 Unlimited 118<br />

Irish BB FWA Breeze Home 512/512 48 Unlimited 147<br />

Table 33: Broadband prices <strong>in</strong> Ireland October 2003<br />

Installation<br />

charge ($)<br />

Forfas recommends the NRE to review the BB spectrum usage with the objective of encourag<strong>in</strong>g operators to<br />

maximise the use of spectrum resources when deliver<strong>in</strong>g broadband services (e.g. free<strong>in</strong>g up spectrum for<br />

WiMax technologies <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>in</strong>crease the range and penetration of wireless services enabl<strong>in</strong>g them to be<br />

more competitive with DSL). 335 Another regulation recommendation put forward by Forfas is for ComReg to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue to put pressure on Eircom to reduce their LLU charges further <strong>in</strong> order for other companies to access<br />

local exchanges and provide <strong>in</strong>novative services. Moreover, Forfas calls for the establishment of a competitive<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle national rate for national backbone access (over state owned networks). It is hoped that this would<br />

facilitate uptake of broadband by bus<strong>in</strong>esses and consumers <strong>in</strong> the regions, as well as help<strong>in</strong>g to attract foreign<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment to the regions.<br />

The government <strong>in</strong>tervenes <strong>in</strong> the provision of BB to schools, libraries and community learn<strong>in</strong>g centers. 336 This<br />

is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with recommendations made by a government advisory body. 337 Fund<strong>in</strong>g for this project comes from a<br />

tax levied on major telecom firms. 338<br />

Ireland’s South West Regional Authority is undertak<strong>in</strong>g a broadband trial aimed directly at rural communities. 339<br />

The scheme is jo<strong>in</strong>tly funded by the European Space Agency and aims to provide broadband access to 2 000<br />

residential and small-bus<strong>in</strong>ess subscribers. Backhaul is be<strong>in</strong>g provided by satellite with local access via wireless<br />

platforms. One novel part of the scheme is that it allows users to roam <strong>in</strong> those rural areas covered by the<br />

project. In other words, a user can access the service at any location us<strong>in</strong>g the same account. The <strong>in</strong>itial three<br />

months are free for subscribers, with a reported aim of eventually provid<strong>in</strong>g a commercial service at USD 28 per<br />

month (or about half the price of basel<strong>in</strong>e DSL <strong>in</strong> urban areas of Ireland).<br />

335 Forfas (2004), p. iii.<br />

336 “Dermot Ahern To L<strong>in</strong>k All Schools to Broadband: Telco Levy May Fund New Development”,<br />

18 June 2003. http://www.mar<strong>in</strong>e.gov.ie/<br />

337 Telecom Strategy Group, “Gett<strong>in</strong>g Ireland Onl<strong>in</strong>e”, http://www.dcmnr.ie/files/tsg.pdf . The report also suggested that local communities<br />

and telecoms should agree to "trigger po<strong>in</strong>ts," or a preset number of customers who would buy broadband if it was available <strong>in</strong> their area.<br />

338 “Telecoms levy to fund schools' <strong>in</strong>ternet service”, The Irish Independent, 17 July 2003.<br />

http://home.eircom.net/content/unison/national/1037017?view=Eircomnet and<br />

http://www.enn.ie/news.html?code=9368851<br />

339 Matthew Clark, “Broadband services uses Wi-fi, satellites”, 7 July 2003. http://www.enn.ie/news.html?code=9367653 and 3COM<br />

“3Com Br<strong>in</strong>gs the Last Green Mile to Ireland with Ildana and the South West Regional Authority”, 7 July 2003<br />

http://www.3com.com/corp<strong>in</strong>fo/en_US/pressbox/press_release.jsp?INFO_ID=151577


Page 197 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

As another direct <strong>in</strong>tervention measure, the Irish Government announced a BB program funded with 65 million<br />

Euro which is be<strong>in</strong>g used to connect high speed access to 19 towns and cities around the country by the end of<br />

2004. 340 Owner of the network will be the state, market<strong>in</strong>g, management and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

will be undertaken by a Management Service Entity (MSE) on a concession basis. 341 In addition to the fibre r<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

and MSE <strong>in</strong>itiative, low cost backhaul is be<strong>in</strong>g provided to the regions of Ireland. 342 Moreover, <strong>in</strong> January 2003<br />

the Irish Government announced five trial programs which aim to deliver wireless BB Internet access across the<br />

country. 343 However, fund<strong>in</strong>g is limited and accounts for less then 300 000 Euro.<br />

8.14.4 Conclusion<br />

Ireland has been considerably lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d other countries. While Ireland is one of the richest nations, it has a<br />

high rural populations which makes BB rollout (and consequently pric<strong>in</strong>g) expensive. However, clearly the lack<br />

of competition needs to be addressed. In this respect, Forfas recommends a few specific measures such as<br />

demand aggregation, free<strong>in</strong>g up of wireless spectrum and lower<strong>in</strong>g LLU access charges.<br />

Because BB uptake is so low, measures are be<strong>in</strong>g implemented by the State and other governmental <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

Most notably, the rollout of a State owned and privately managed network is a promis<strong>in</strong>g – though disputed –<br />

approach towards putt<strong>in</strong>g some market driven pressure on the <strong>in</strong>cumbent Eircom.<br />

340 http://www.rte.ie/news/2003/0210/broadband.html<br />

341 Dermot Ahern “Broadband Metropolitan Area Networks on Schedule”, Press release, 29 July 2003.<br />

http://www.mar<strong>in</strong>e.gov.ie/modules/pressreleases.asp<br />

342 OECD (2004), p. 27. Department of Communications, Mar<strong>in</strong>e and Natural Resources, “Dermot Ahern Announces Breakthrough <strong>in</strong><br />

Broadband Pric<strong>in</strong>g For Regions”, Press Release, 16 December 2003. www.dcmnr.ie and “Dermot Ahern Welcomes eircom DSL Move”,<br />

Press Release, 15 December 2003.<br />

343 Sheila McDonald, “Irish WLANs w<strong>in</strong> government fund<strong>in</strong>g”, 27 January 2003. http://www.electricnews.net/news.html?code=9155309


8.15 Italy<br />

8.15.1 Introduction<br />

Page 198 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Italy, which was a founder member of the European Union on 1 January 1958, has 57 888 200 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a<br />

territory of 301 262 square km, which means that its population density is 189.7 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The<br />

density is thus <strong>in</strong> the upper part of the EU range. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 105.4 of the EU 25<br />

average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.15.2 The broadband market<br />

Italy has traditionally one of the highest usages of mobile telephony with a penetration rate of over 106%, far<br />

above EU average, but a relatively low number of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, equivalent to only 45.9% 344 of the population,<br />

among the lowest of the old member states. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is still dom<strong>in</strong>ated by Telecom Italia, but<br />

around one third of the market by revenue is now accounted for by its competitors 345 . The mobile telephony<br />

market is very competitive. Telecom Italia’s TIM has a 42.7% market share, while Vodafone has 33.2% and<br />

W<strong>in</strong>d 19.3% of the market, while Hutch<strong>in</strong>son’s “3” has 4.8% 346 .<br />

The Italian broadband market is rapidly expand<strong>in</strong>g. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per<br />

population stood at 8.3% at the end of 2004, as compared to 6.2% six month earlier (and to 2.8% <strong>in</strong> July 2003).<br />

In total numbers, this represents an impressive 32.6% growth from 3.6 to 4.7 million <strong>in</strong> just half a year. Of that<br />

total, 4.4 million are DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 93.7%, up from 92.1% at the end of June. Fiber-to-the-Home<br />

provides 196 000 connections (4.1%), overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly accounted for by FastWeb, a new entrant operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the big cities Milan, Tor<strong>in</strong>o, Roma, Naples and Genoa, while satellite has 105 000 connections (2.2%), but the<br />

latter are mostly one-way connections us<strong>in</strong>g the phone l<strong>in</strong>e as a return channel. Italy has no significant cable<br />

network. The DSL market is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly controlled by Telecom Italia and its subsidiaries, which account<br />

directly for 76.3% of DSL subscriptions, with another 13.5% retailed on their <strong>in</strong>frastructure by other ISPs. The<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 10.2% are unbundled DSL or shared access l<strong>in</strong>es. 347<br />

The rapid DSL development <strong>in</strong> Italy is facilitated by the fact that a high proportion of its local copper loops<br />

serve relatively short distances. More than 80% of twisted pair connections are less than 2 kilometres <strong>in</strong> length,<br />

some 95% are with<strong>in</strong> 3.5 kilometres from an exchange, and nearly all are less than 5 kilometres from an<br />

exchange 348 . Even so, around 4,400 out of 10,400 local exchanges are not connected to the backhaul broadband<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure. As a consequence, <strong>in</strong> May 2004 only 76% of the Italian population could access ADSL services,<br />

and the average was significantly lower <strong>in</strong> the Mezzogiorno regions, dropp<strong>in</strong>g as low as 48% <strong>in</strong> Basilicata.<br />

The demand for fixed broadband connections is also affected by the rapid spread<strong>in</strong>g of 3G services, where Italy<br />

is Europe’s lead<strong>in</strong>g country. The 3G services, offered by two of the three <strong>in</strong>cumbent mobile networks and a by a<br />

new entrant, had 2.9 million subscribers by the end of 2004 and are grow<strong>in</strong>g rapidly, add<strong>in</strong>g another 200 000<br />

subscribers <strong>in</strong> January 2005 349 .<br />

8.15.3 Broadband policy<br />

The current strategy, the “National Executive Broadband Programme”, <strong>in</strong>tends to provide a favourable<br />

environment for ICT <strong>in</strong>vestments through a balanced approach towards the development of broadband<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure and services. The objectives of the programme are fourfold: a broadband network for public<br />

services, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> broadband connected schools, the stimulation of private demand through <strong>in</strong>centives for<br />

the use of digital technologies and facilitation measures for <strong>in</strong>frastructure build<strong>in</strong>g. Furthermore, the Italian<br />

Broadband Observatory was set up as a three-year project to monitor the development of broadband <strong>in</strong> Italy<br />

The first-stage implementation of the national programme <strong>in</strong>cludes two sub-programmes. An <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

programme run by Infratel, a company set up by the M<strong>in</strong>istry for Communications, and a demand-support<br />

344<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

345<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report),{COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

346<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005; <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 3G networks<br />

347<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

348<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf<br />

349<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005


Page 199 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

programme promot<strong>in</strong>g the implementation of high added value applicative multimedia services, run by<br />

Innovazione Italia, a company set up by the M<strong>in</strong>istry for Technological Innovation.<br />

Infratel is currently develop<strong>in</strong>g an operative model aimed at attract<strong>in</strong>g additional resources from a variety of<br />

sources <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g regions, local branches of the public adm<strong>in</strong>istrations, telecom operators, private enterprises<br />

and Innovazione Italia. For example, <strong>in</strong> March 2005 it has launched a call for tender for 127 mio € for a<br />

broadband network <strong>in</strong> municipalities and villages <strong>in</strong> 8 southern regions (Sicilia, Puglia, Campania, Basilicata,<br />

Calabria, Abruzzo, Molise and Sardegna) to reduce the digital divide <strong>in</strong> the regions. For the same reason, the<br />

wealthy northern region of Lombardia has signed a 200 mio € agreement with 5 telecom providers (Albacom,<br />

Colt, Fastweb, Telecom Italia, W<strong>in</strong>d) for the development of a broadband network <strong>in</strong> its region with<strong>in</strong> three<br />

years. 350 All Information Society actions (strategies and programmes) are expected to be agreed and implemented<br />

by central and regional/local government through specific framework agreements 351 .<br />

8.15.4 Conclusion<br />

Broadband development is clearly tak<strong>in</strong>g off very fast <strong>in</strong> Italy. From July 2003 to December 2004, the<br />

penetration rate tripled. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, Italian penetration kept <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the EU average – <strong>in</strong>deed, the Italian<br />

figure was virtually identical with the EU average both <strong>in</strong> June and <strong>in</strong> December 2004. If the 3G subscriptions<br />

are added, where Italy is among the most advanced EU countries, overall broadband penetration rises another<br />

5%.<br />

The favourable structure of the local loop should enable further rapid DSL development. However, the<br />

geographic structure of the country, with many mounta<strong>in</strong>ous areas, which is reflected <strong>in</strong> the limited coverage<br />

and <strong>in</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g lower population density, as well as economic imbalances between north and south,<br />

may lead to a lack of broadband development <strong>in</strong> a significant part of the territory. On the other hand, the strong<br />

development of Fiber-To-The-Home <strong>in</strong> the big cities puts Italy <strong>in</strong> the lead <strong>in</strong> this technology, together with<br />

Sweden.<br />

350 http://www.osservatoriobandalarga.it/<br />

351 EU Commission, Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper Annexes of the “Communication Connect<strong>in</strong>g Europe at High Speed: National Broadband<br />

Strategies”, COM (2004) 369 of 12.5.2004


8.16 Latvia<br />

8.16.1 Introduction<br />

Page 200 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Latvia, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has 2 319 200 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of 64 589<br />

square km, which means that its population density is 36.2 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is thus at the<br />

lower end of the EU range. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 43.7% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.16.2 The broadband market<br />

Latvia has a one of the lowest usages of mobile telephony among the new member states with a penetration rate<br />

of over 69%, far below EU average. It has also one of the lowest fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density, equivalent to only 28% 352 of<br />

the population, which is fairly low even by the standards of the new member states. Furthermore, Latvia has also<br />

seen significant recent decrease <strong>in</strong> fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density. The national fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is still a virtual monopoly<br />

of Lattelekom 353 , but the mobile telephony market is competitive. Lattelekom’s Latvijas Mobilais Telefons<br />

(LMR) has a 46.7% market share, while Tele 2 has 53.1%, and 0.2% are held by Telekom Baltija, a new<br />

entrant 354 .<br />

The Latvian broadband market is just emerg<strong>in</strong>g from its <strong>in</strong>fancy. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband<br />

connections per population stood at 1.4% at the end of September 2004 (no figures available for December), as<br />

compared to 1.2% three month earlier. This corresponds to a total of 33 000, the second-lowest absolute figure<br />

<strong>in</strong> the EU after Cyprus. Of that total 79% are DSL, 6% cable and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 15% provided by other means.<br />

The DSL market is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly controlled by Lattelekom and its subsidiaries, which account directly for<br />

95.4% of DSL subscriptions. The other 4.6% are retailed on its <strong>in</strong>frastructure by other ISPs. 355<br />

The low population density comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the low <strong>in</strong>come level means that rural areas’ access to <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s limited. A world bank estimate of Latvia’s teledensity (at 30.3) spells out the difference between Riga,<br />

where the figure is 52.6, and the rest of the country, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g towns, where it is 19.6. 356 Mobile broadband <strong>in</strong><br />

Latvia is still at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. The new entrant has launched a 3G network, but had only just above 3 000<br />

subscribers <strong>in</strong> January 2005 357 .<br />

8.16.3 Broadband policy<br />

Latvia does not seem to have adopted a specific broadband strategy (yet). In did have a National Programme<br />

Informatics <strong>in</strong> 1999, updated by e-Latvia <strong>in</strong> 2000, which is still valid until the end of 2005, but there is no recent<br />

strategic document focuss<strong>in</strong>g on high-speed access. In the Basic Guidel<strong>in</strong>es of Electronic Communication Sector<br />

Policy of the Republic of Latvia 2004-2008 ensur<strong>in</strong>g availability of secure <strong>in</strong>ternet services is identified as one<br />

of a set of eight priorities. In terms of implementation, the S<strong>in</strong>gle Strategy of National Economy emphasises the<br />

role of public procurement for the implementation of <strong>in</strong>formation society projects and a functional model of egovernment,<br />

which would <strong>in</strong>clude the recognition of electronic documents and electronic signature <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

foster e-government services as well as e-commerce. It also identifies two other action l<strong>in</strong>es as priorities: the<br />

computerisation of educational establishments and local governments and the creation of a wide network of<br />

publicly accessible <strong>in</strong>ternet connection po<strong>in</strong>ts. These are addressed with<strong>in</strong> three programmes: the Unified<br />

Information System for Local Governments, the Education Information System of Latvia, and the State Unified<br />

Library Information System. 358<br />

352<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

353<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

354<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

355<br />

Source: ECTA + footnote 1<br />

356<br />

Central and Eastern Europe Information Society Benchmarks, Country Analysis, September 2004, EU Commission<br />

357<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

358<br />

Republic of Latvia M<strong>in</strong>istry of Economics: S<strong>in</strong>gle Strategy of National Economy, 18.8.2004


8.16.4 Conclusion<br />

Page 201 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Broadband <strong>in</strong> Latvia is lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d. In penetration terms, Latvia is at the very end of the table, together with<br />

Poland and Slovakia (and Greece), but it has neither the potential DSL vs. cable competition (like Poland and<br />

Slovakia), nor a grow<strong>in</strong>g number of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es (like Poland), nor a specific broadband strategy (like everybody<br />

else). The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of these factors with low population density and low per-capita <strong>in</strong>come levels makes<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure access at affordable prices the most likely bottleneck for the years to come.


8.17 Lithuania<br />

8.17.1 Introduction<br />

Page 202 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Lithuania, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has 3 445 900 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of 65<br />

200 square km, which means that its population density is 53.1 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is thus at<br />

the lower end of the EU range. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 48% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.17.2 The broadband market<br />

Lithuania has now an above-average usage of mobile telephony, with a penetration rate of over 95%, after the<br />

strongest growth of all Member States <strong>in</strong> 2004. However, it has also the lowest fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density, equivalent to<br />

only 23.9% 359 of the population, which is extremely low even by the standards of the new member states.<br />

Furthermore, Lithuania has also seen the largest recent decrease <strong>in</strong> fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is<br />

still a near monopoly of Lietuvos Telekomas with a market share of 97% 360 . The mobile telephony market is<br />

competitive. Lietuvos Telekomas’ Omnitel has a 39.8% market share, while Tele2 has 32.1% and Bité 28.1% 361 .<br />

The Lithuanian broadband market is now rapidly expand<strong>in</strong>g, after an early but slow start – the first ADSL was<br />

made available <strong>in</strong> May 2001. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per population stood at 3.7% at<br />

the end of 2004, as compared to 2.5% six month earlier. In percentage terms, this represents an impressive<br />

46.2% growth, but <strong>in</strong> actual figures the <strong>in</strong>crease was only 41 000 from 88 000 to 129 000 <strong>in</strong> just half a year. Of<br />

that total, 50 000 are DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 39.2%, up from 38.6% at the end of June. Cable accounts for 25%,<br />

while the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 35.8% are made up of various technologies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g FWA, fibre and PLC. The DSL<br />

market is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly controlled by Lietuvos Telekomas and its subsidiaries, which account directly for<br />

93.6% of DSL subscriptions, while the other 6.4% are retailed on their <strong>in</strong>frastructure by other ISPs. There are no<br />

unbundled DSL access l<strong>in</strong>es. 362<br />

Only 35% of households <strong>in</strong> rural areas (up to 2 000 <strong>in</strong>habitants) have fixed l<strong>in</strong>es 363 , which clearly <strong>in</strong>hibits DSL<br />

roll-out, yet this is where 31% of the population live. There was no 3G network operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Lithuania at the<br />

start of 2005, but two of the three operators were provid<strong>in</strong>g GPRS services.<br />

8.17.3 Broadband policy<br />

Lithuania has followed the eEurope+ strategy s<strong>in</strong>ce 2001. For the purpose of implement<strong>in</strong>g the strategic plan,<br />

detailed plans 364 for development of <strong>in</strong>formation society <strong>in</strong> Lithuania are drawn on annual basis, establish<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

key measures, the necessary resources, and the responsible <strong>in</strong>stitutions. Lithuania’s actions focus on ensur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

availability of Internet access and organisation of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 365 .<br />

Free-of-charge public Internet access po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> Lithuania <strong>in</strong> public libraries and rural areas are an important tool<br />

for access. At the close of 2003, there were more than 300 public Internet access centres <strong>in</strong> Lithuania, where<br />

people could enjoy free Internet service 366 . The plans for the next few years <strong>in</strong>clude establish<strong>in</strong>g another 600<br />

Internet access po<strong>in</strong>ts. For tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, for example a free tool “Remote Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Course: Computer Textbook” was<br />

created and was available on the Internet (the Information Society Development Committee website at<br />

http://www.ivpk.lt).<br />

Other priorities <strong>in</strong>clude e-government, e-health and e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess. A particular success has been e-bank<strong>in</strong>g: the ten<br />

Lithuanian commercial banks had 926.7 thousand Internet bank<strong>in</strong>g users <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of this year, which is<br />

45% more than the respective number <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2004 (639.4 thousand) 367 .<br />

359<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

360<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

361<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

362<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

363<br />

Central and Eastern Europe Information Society Benchmarks, Country Analysis, September 2004, EU Commission<br />

364<br />

The plan of 2003 approved by the Government Resolution No. 1127 “On Approval of Lithuanian Information Society Development<br />

Detailed Plan for 2003” dated September 4, 2003 (Ž<strong>in</strong>., 2001, No. 86-3905).<br />

365<br />

“Report on <strong>in</strong>formation society development <strong>in</strong> Lithuania 2003”; Information Society Development Committee under the Government of<br />

the Republic of Lithuania, 2004<br />

366<br />

Source: the Information Society Development Committee.<br />

367<br />

http://www.ivpk.lt/


8.17.4 Conclusion<br />

Page 203 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Lithuania has been relatively successful <strong>in</strong> terms of broadband penetration <strong>in</strong> comparison with its immediate<br />

neighbours, Latvia and Poland, but is significantly lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d the overall EU average. Its ma<strong>in</strong> challenge<br />

will the same as most new member states, that is, ensur<strong>in</strong>g broadband access <strong>in</strong> rural areas, despite very low<br />

population density and very low fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e teledensity.


8.18 Luxembourg<br />

8.18.1 Introduction<br />

Page 204 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The government of Luxembourg is mak<strong>in</strong>g a big effort <strong>in</strong> order to place the country among the leaders of the<br />

digital access. In a recent benchmark published by the ITU (International Telecommunication Union),<br />

Luxembourg was ahead of all its neighbours, i.e. Belgium, Germany and France. In order to reach this position,<br />

the government of Luxembourg drives an aggressive policy of <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>frastructures as showed <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 34.<br />

Country Total (M US$) Per capita (US$)<br />

Per phone<br />

subscriber<br />

(US $)<br />

Luxembourg 72.3 164.5 95.7 21.0<br />

Europe 61 011 76.4 84.1 17.8<br />

World 182 763 31.1 83.5 23.2<br />

US 29 620 104 92.7 -<br />

France 5 471.7 91.8 75.5 17.1<br />

Germany 6 632.1 80.4 58.3 11.4<br />

Belgium 753.8 72.8 56.9 11.0<br />

Table 34: <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure (UIT 2003).<br />

% Income<br />

These efforts provided the country with a good optical fiber architecture, a sharp rise of high bit rate l<strong>in</strong>ks and a<br />

global cover of ADSL access. Luxembourg is now 10th <strong>in</strong> the world <strong>in</strong> term of bandwidth per capita. The<br />

country is also the home of one of the most important satellite operator (SES-GLOBAL) and of the European<br />

leader <strong>in</strong> radio and TV services, RTL.<br />

8.18.2 The broadband market<br />

95% of the population can access broadband services through ADSL or cable networks. 75% of households<br />

have PCs, and 60% have Internet access. 7% have broadband, of which 89% ADSL and 11% cable, with a<br />

growth of 66% <strong>in</strong> 2003 (source: ILRes). The connected households use services <strong>in</strong>tensively: 50% use ecommerce<br />

and e-bank<strong>in</strong>g, 60% e-travel and 33% e-government (i.e. 20% of the population).<br />

Households’ equipments are really good, but mobile equipments are even better, which should allow a good<br />

success for the next 3G services.<br />

Country<br />

Phone l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

/ 100 people<br />

Mobile subscriber<br />

/ 100 people<br />

Luxembourg 78 106<br />

Europe 41 20<br />

World 17 18<br />

US 66 49<br />

France 57 64<br />

Germany 65 71<br />

Belgium 49 78<br />

Table 35:


Page 205 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

With a market share of 89% <strong>in</strong> the broadband market DSL networks are ma<strong>in</strong>ly operated by EPT or rented from<br />

EPT by external providers (Cegecom or Luxembourg Onl<strong>in</strong>e for <strong>in</strong>stance). The good quality of the phone<br />

architecture allows to the operators to offer broadband services all over the country.<br />

Offer name<br />

Speedsurf<br />

Downstream<br />

(Mb/s)<br />

Upstream<br />

(Kb/s)<br />

Data Volume 368<br />

(GB per month)<br />

Subscription<br />

(euros / month)<br />

Junior 1 128 1 29<br />

Run 2 192 15 47<br />

Express 3 192 25 79<br />

Table 36: Ma<strong>in</strong> EPT products<br />

For gam<strong>in</strong>g applications, the subscriber can use a FastPath, with higher upstream speed reduc<strong>in</strong>g the error<br />

control.<br />

368 Extra data volume cost: 0.3€ / MB.<br />

Figure 68: Territorial coverage


Page 206 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Cable networks are really popular <strong>in</strong> Luxembourg: 90% of households receive up to 46 different TV programs<br />

<strong>in</strong> this way. But the cable operators need to face two important challenges: the network <strong>in</strong>frastructures are old,<br />

and the important number of small cable operators makes connect<strong>in</strong>g the different networks difficult. However,<br />

cable networks already exist and are an important part of the telecommunication landscape <strong>in</strong> Luxembourg. It is<br />

the reason why the government pushes the operators to connect and digitalise the networks <strong>in</strong> order to offer a<br />

broadband access beside the TV channels. But once aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestments are heavy. The market share is only 11%<br />

of the broadband services for the cable operators, and only 33% of the population is able to receive digital<br />

signals at home us<strong>in</strong>g these networks.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> offers are proposed by Coditel, Cegecom, TV Surf and Luxembourg Onl<strong>in</strong>e. Their relevant offers are<br />

described below:<br />

CODITEL:<br />

Downstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

Upstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

e-mail<br />

address<br />

(number)<br />

Available<br />

Web<br />

space<br />

(MB)<br />

PC connected Subcribtion<br />

(euro<br />

/month)<br />

Modem<br />

(euro)<br />

LightClick 1M 128 k 1 10 Unlimited 24.90 € 0 €<br />

SpeedClick 4 M 256 k 1 10 Unlimited 45,00 € 0 €<br />

Table 37: Ma<strong>in</strong> offers by CODITEL<br />

A caution of 50€ is required for the cable modem. The data volume is limited respectively 1 and 15 GB, the<br />

extra data is sold 5€ (respectively 10€) per GB.<br />

CEGECOM:<br />

Downstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

Upstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

e-mail<br />

address<br />

(number)<br />

Available<br />

Web<br />

space<br />

(MB)<br />

PC connected Subcribtion<br />

(euro /month)<br />

Modem<br />

(euro)<br />

Easy 512 k 64 k 1 25,00 € 150,00 €<br />

Standard 1 M 128 k 1 1 46,00 € 150,00 €<br />

Advanced 2 M 192 k 5 5 1 69,00 € 150,00 €<br />

Advanced 4 2 M 192 k 5 5 4 79,00 € 150,00 €<br />

Pro 3 M 256 k 10 10 1 89,00 € 150,00 €<br />

Pro 4 3 M 256 k 10 10 4 99,00 € 150,00 €<br />

Table 38: Ma<strong>in</strong> offers by CEGECOM<br />

Cegecom is also a pioneer <strong>in</strong> the PLC doma<strong>in</strong> and an important actor of the DSL world.


TV SURF (the cable offer of EPT <strong>in</strong> partnership with Siemens):<br />

Downstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

Upstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

e-mail<br />

address<br />

(number)<br />

Available<br />

Web<br />

space<br />

(MB)<br />

Page 207 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

PC connected Subcribtion<br />

(euro /month)<br />

TV Surf 1M 128 k 1 - - 49.91 € -<br />

Table 39: Ma<strong>in</strong> offers by TV SURF<br />

The data volume is limited to 12 GB per month. Extra data volume cost: 0.3€ / MB<br />

LUXEMBOURG ONLINE:<br />

Downstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

Upstream<br />

(bit/s)<br />

e-mail<br />

address<br />

(number)<br />

Available<br />

Web<br />

space<br />

(MB)<br />

PC connected Subcribtion<br />

(euro /month)<br />

Hispeed Lite 512k 96 k 3 Yes - 28 €<br />

Hispeed<br />

1000<br />

Hispeed<br />

2000<br />

Hispeed<br />

3000<br />

1M 128 k 3 Yes - 40 €<br />

2M 192 k 3 Yes - 50 €<br />

3M 256 k 3 Yes - 70 €<br />

Modem<br />

(euro)<br />

Modem<br />

(euro)<br />

Separated<br />

offer<br />

Separated<br />

offer<br />

Separated<br />

offer<br />

Separated<br />

offer<br />

Download capacity is unlimited. Luxembourg OnL<strong>in</strong>e is also a DSL operator and a satellite operator. The<br />

satellite offer allows only deliver<strong>in</strong>g downstream data but the return path is through a dial-up l<strong>in</strong>e. Three offers<br />

exist:<br />

• Flat: 256 kb/s downstream for 25€ per month<br />

• Time: 256 kb/s downstream for 10€ per month plus 0.331€ per m<strong>in</strong>ute.<br />

• Time: 1024 kb/s downstream for 25€ per month plus 0.595€ per m<strong>in</strong>ute.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g 3G, the government attributed 4 UMTS licenses: Tango (Tele2), LuxGSM (EPT), Orange (France<br />

Telecom) and Lux Communications SA. The tests are still runn<strong>in</strong>g, but the lack of <strong>in</strong>novative services is the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> reason for the fact that the providers are wait<strong>in</strong>g for the development of mobile TV or radio stream<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

for a real broadband Internet access currently limited to 384 kb/s. This limited bandwidth of the Internet access<br />

and the poor content of the offered TV stream<strong>in</strong>g are the ma<strong>in</strong> explanations of the very slow take-up of UMTS<br />

services despite the attractive pack offered by LuxCommunications <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a PC and a multimode data board<br />

(UMTS/WLAN/GPRS/GSM) for 1500€, <strong>in</strong> a first UMTS commercial offer described <strong>in</strong> Table 40:<br />

Install fees Subscription Data Volume Extra MB<br />

UMTS Data 500 Free 37.5€ 500 MB 0.8€<br />

UMTS Data 150 Free 25€ 150 MB 0.9€<br />

UMTS Data 50 Free 12.5€ 50 MB 1.3€<br />

UMTS Data 10 Free 10€ 10 MB 1.9€<br />

Table 40: UMTS products


8.18.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 208 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The objective <strong>in</strong> 2005 is 25% of households access<strong>in</strong>g to the broadband services. The government of<br />

Luxembourg provides also a good toolbox for the promotion of the <strong>in</strong>teractive services:<br />

• eLuxembourg is an action plan which allowed to launch an e-government portal<br />

•<br />

(www.gouvernement.lu) but also a statistical portal, a portal allow<strong>in</strong>g to make easier the relations<br />

between the adm<strong>in</strong>istration and the companies and several others (<strong>in</strong>novation, health, culture, youth…),<br />

the label “Luxembourg e-commerce certified” is a good tool <strong>in</strong> order to promote e-commerce,<br />

• security is pushed by the Luxtrust consortium promot<strong>in</strong>g the use of the PKI (Public Key Infrastructure)<br />

technology, and the country was the first to promote e-Commerce with a label and to push <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

about security and electronic signature,<br />

• the deployment of “InternetStuffen” allow<strong>in</strong>g to educate the citizens to the Internet technologies,<br />

• the creation of a technical area (Esch sur Alzette) <strong>in</strong> order to host R&D centers.


8.19 Malta<br />

8.19.1 Introduction<br />

Page 209 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Malta has a population of 400 000 and is the smallest country <strong>in</strong> the EU. 369 As for its GDP, <strong>in</strong> 2003 Malta's<br />

economy had a score of 72.8 with the EU-25 average value at 100. 370 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Worldbank, GNI per<br />

capita was 10 220 (a high <strong>in</strong>come country has an average of 28 550). 371 Despite the rather low wealth of the<br />

country, BB penetration rate is 5,8% which is only marg<strong>in</strong>ally below the EU average of 6.03% . 372<br />

8.19.2 The broadband market<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to MCA, <strong>in</strong> the last quarter of 2003 30% of all subscriptions were BB. BB uptake rate is 17% of all<br />

households (with a further 41% connected via narrow-band. 373 As for growth rates, though the number of dialup<br />

connected households is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g (from 38.9% <strong>in</strong> 2002 to 41.3% <strong>in</strong> 2003), BB access – <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

households – is grow<strong>in</strong>g at a much faster pace (from 12.3% <strong>in</strong> 2002 to 17.3%).<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g access technologies, 57% are DSL and 43% are cable. Fibre to the home is not available but the<br />

backbone of the country is l<strong>in</strong>ked via fibre. As for network dimension, 95% are covered by DSL and 81% via<br />

bi-directional cable. 374 Both access technologies witness similar growth rates. 375 Figure 69 376 shows BB<br />

availability <strong>in</strong> Malta. Basically, the whole country is covered.<br />

Figure 69: Broadband availability <strong>in</strong> Malta<br />

369 http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/3-31082004-BP/EN/3-31082004-BP-EN.PDF<br />

370 Malta GDP<br />

371 http://www.worldbank.org/data/countrydata/aag/mlt_aag.pdf<br />

372 MCA (2004) p. 5.<br />

373 MCA (2004) The National Broadband Strategy. Available at http://www.miti.gov.mt/docs/broadband.pdf (Annex 2, p.34)<br />

374 MCA (2004) p. 5.<br />

375 MCA (2004) The National Broadband Strategy. Available at http://www.miti.gov.mt/docs/broadband.pdf (Annex 2, p.33)<br />

376 MCA (2004) The National Broadband Strategy. Available at http://www.miti.gov.mt/docs/broadband.pdf (Annex 3, p.35)


8.19.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 210 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The Maltese Communications Authority (MCA) Malta has produced a very comprehensive and useful report on<br />

the national Broadband Strategy. 377 It identifies key drivers and barriers and conta<strong>in</strong>s a Broadband model378 with<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> stakeholder and how to implement successfully national BB goals.<br />

The quality of BB services is one of the key drivers and advantages over Internet via dial-up. Closely related, the<br />

availability of new content and services are another ma<strong>in</strong> reason why people sign up for BB. Infrastructure<br />

competition between cable and DSL is another key driver as it lowers prices. Awareness about new services and<br />

education on the use of ICT <strong>in</strong> general are other key drivers379 .<br />

Lack of BB based local services and content is perhaps the ma<strong>in</strong> barrier for people to sign up for BB. In<br />

particular, content <strong>in</strong> the Maltese language is lack<strong>in</strong>g. Start up costs are high, as BB access term<strong>in</strong>als (PCs <strong>in</strong><br />

particular) are still expensive for many people <strong>in</strong> the society. In addition, runn<strong>in</strong>g costs for connection are too<br />

high as well. Lack of trust and confidence are other barriers to a higher BB uptake rate. Generally, people are<br />

hesitant to use new technologies, especially for e-commerce purposes. The limited size of Malta, geographical<br />

facts (island) and low economies of scale are other barriers. Private <strong>in</strong>vestors often expect a higher return on<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment. Last, BB pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Malta is still <strong>in</strong>flexible, as pric<strong>in</strong>g is based on the type of connection speed.<br />

Alternative pric<strong>in</strong>g models tak<strong>in</strong>g actual usage pattern <strong>in</strong>to account are suggested. 380<br />

The Maltese broadband strategy <strong>in</strong>cludes four strategic objectives to be fulfilled 2004-2006:<br />

• Secure a ubiquitous multiple broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure which covers 99% of the population and is<br />

capable of deliver<strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 512 kbps <strong>in</strong> the downstream direction to the end user<br />

• Ensure a regulatory framework which supports and encourages a competitive environment which <strong>in</strong><br />

turn susta<strong>in</strong>s the availability of multiple technological platforms<br />

• Increase the accessibility of broadband technology to all residential and bus<strong>in</strong>ess set – ups<br />

• Susta<strong>in</strong> the development of broadband content, applications and services targeted at the local<br />

population and which expose the Maltese <strong>in</strong>dustry to the global virtual market381 377 MCA (2004) The National Broadband Strategy. Available at http://www.miti.gov.mt/docs/broadband.pdf<br />

378 MCA (2004), p. 17-29.<br />

379 Ibid. p. 14-15.<br />

380 Ibid. p. 15-16.<br />

381 Ibid. p. 14-15.


8.20 Poland<br />

8.20.1 Introduction<br />

Page 211 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Poland, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has 38 190 600 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of 312<br />

677 square km, which means that its population density is 122.3 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is thus<br />

broadly <strong>in</strong> the middle of the EU range, although somewhat higher than the average. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted<br />

GDP stood at 47.5% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.20.2 The broadband market<br />

Poland has by a wide marg<strong>in</strong> the lowest usage of mobile telephony of all Member States, with a penetration rate<br />

of just under 61% - among the others, only Latvia (69%), France (71%) and Malta (74%) are below 80%. In<br />

terms of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, while Poland has an extremely low density, equivalent to only 32.2% 382 of the population,<br />

this is with<strong>in</strong> the norm of the accession countries bar Cyprus and Malta. Moreover, Poland is one of only three<br />

member states where fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density is still grow<strong>in</strong>g strongly The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is still very much<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ated by Telekomunikacja Polska, which accounts for 80-90% of all markets 383 . It was 95.5% digitalised by<br />

the end of 2003, but is not scheduled to reach 100% before 2006 384 . The mobile telephony market is very<br />

competitive. TP’s Centertel has a 32.2% market share, while Polkomtel has 30.3% and Polska Telefonia<br />

Cyfrowa (PTC) 37.5% 385 .<br />

The Polish broadband market is still <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>fancy. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per<br />

population stood at 0.5% at the end of September 2004 (no figures available for December), as compared to<br />

0.4% three month earlier. This corresponds to a total of 180 000, only slightly above Estonia, which has twenty<br />

times less population. Of that total, 139 000 are DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 77.2%, up from 92.1% at the end of<br />

June, with the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 22.8% provided by cable. Cable has a significant potential, as there are 4.5 million<br />

cable TV subscribers, which corresponds to 54% of households passed by the more than 600 cable network<br />

operators. The DSL market is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly controlled by Telekomunikacja Polska and its subsidiaries, which<br />

account directly for 96.4% of DSL subscriptions, The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 3.6% are unbundled DSL access l<strong>in</strong>es; no l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

are retailed on its <strong>in</strong>frastructure by other ISPs. 386 Fixed wireless access <strong>in</strong> the form of LMDS (local multipo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

distribution services) is also offered, but mostly for the bus<strong>in</strong>ess market, and take-up is very low.<br />

Mobile broadband <strong>in</strong> Poland is still at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. Only of the three 2G operators, has launched a 3G network,<br />

but the subscribers were still <strong>in</strong> the hundreds <strong>in</strong> January 2005 387 . The deadl<strong>in</strong>e for launch<strong>in</strong>g the other 3G<br />

networks has been rescheduled to the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2006.<br />

8.20.3 Broadband policy<br />

The current “National Strategy for Developoment of Broadband Access to Internet for 2004-2006” was adopted<br />

<strong>in</strong> December 2003 388 and subsequently turned <strong>in</strong>to an implementation programme <strong>in</strong> August 2004. It is part of<br />

the larger Information strategy of the Republic of Poland – ePoland for 2004-2006. The goal of the broadband<br />

strategy is to multiply the use of broadband access to the Internet by build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and services, the<br />

construction of access <strong>in</strong>frastructure, and focus<strong>in</strong>g on the role of public adm<strong>in</strong>istrations.<br />

On the demand side, e-government, e-health and e-learn<strong>in</strong>g services are to be developed and offered to the<br />

citizens by the various state bodies <strong>in</strong>volved. For e-government, the focus is on an active <strong>in</strong>volvement of local<br />

and regional adm<strong>in</strong>istrations. E-education is of particular importance, because Poland is experienc<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

382<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refers to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be significant)<br />

383<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report),{COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

384<br />

National Strategy for Development of Broadband Access to Internet for 2004-2006, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Infrastructure, M<strong>in</strong>istry of Science and<br />

Information, 23.12.2003<br />

385<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

386<br />

Source: ECTA ; the source <strong>in</strong> footnote 2 reckons there were 192 000 DSL l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> July<br />

387<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

388<br />

Program "Upowszechnienie szerokopasmowego dostępu do Internetu na lata 2004 - 2006" - dokument przyjęty przez Radę M<strong>in</strong>istrów w<br />

dniu 31 sierpnia 2004 r.


Page 212 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

education boom, with rapidly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g enrolment numbers. Concern<strong>in</strong>g e-bus<strong>in</strong>ess, the priority lies <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a conducive framework, especially for the numerous SMEs.<br />

On the supply side, all schools are to be connected by broadband by 2006, while the PIONIER scheme should<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g broadband to scientific and academic centers by the end of 2005. One of the biggest challenges for Poland<br />

is how to ensure connectivity <strong>in</strong> its rural areas. At the end of 2003, accord<strong>in</strong>g to a survey, 30% of respondents<br />

who live <strong>in</strong> Polish rural areas (less than 2 000 <strong>in</strong>habitants) did not have a fixed telephone, and therefore no<br />

chance to get ADSL, while 12.4% did not have any telephone at all 389 . This challenge is recognised <strong>in</strong> the<br />

broadband strategy. Local and regional adm<strong>in</strong>istrations are scheduled to get broadband connections with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

framework for the European Regional Development Fund. Altogether, there are 140 mio € earmarked for<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation society <strong>in</strong>frastructures <strong>in</strong> the Polish Operational Programme of the ERDF, of which 93 mio € are to<br />

come from the EU.<br />

8.20.4 Conclusion<br />

Poland’s start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t for develop<strong>in</strong>g broadband access is not easy. It has, together with Greece, the lowest<br />

penetration rate of the entire EU, with such a gap to the most of the other member state, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g some poorer<br />

ones, that even five consecutive years of annual doubl<strong>in</strong>g would not be sufficient to catch up with the average.<br />

In addition, with the lowest mobile phone penetration - aga<strong>in</strong> with a significant gap - the development of 3G is<br />

likely to be slower than <strong>in</strong> many other member states, too. As a large country with an above-average share of the<br />

population liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas, roll-out of all networks is also more expensive than <strong>in</strong> other countries. On the<br />

positive side, Poland’s fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density has been grow<strong>in</strong>g recently, thus <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the potential for DSL rollout,<br />

cable networks are a source of potential competition for considerable parts of the population, and the limited<br />

data available po<strong>in</strong>ts to fast growth of broadband connections, albeit from the low base described.<br />

389 Central and Eastern Europe Information Society Benchmarks, Country Analysis, September 2004, EU Commission


8.21 Portugal<br />

8.21.1 Introduction<br />

Page 213 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Portugal, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 January 1986, has 10 474 700 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of<br />

92 389 square km, which means that its population density is 112.8 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is<br />

close to the EU average. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 73.4% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.21.2 The broadband market<br />

Portugal has a high usage of mobile telephony with a penetration rate of over 96%, significantly above EU<br />

average, but a very low number of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, equivalent to only 40.3% 390 of the population, the second-lowest<br />

of the old member states. This means that among the new member states not only Malta and Cyprus, but also<br />

Slovenia have overtaken Portugal’s fixed l<strong>in</strong>e density. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is still overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly dom<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

by Portugal Telecom, with a mere 13% of the market by revenue accounted for by its competitors 391 . The mobile<br />

telephony market is competitive. Portugal Telecom’s TMN has a 51.3% market share, while Vodafone has<br />

32.9% and Optimus 15.8% 392 .<br />

The Portuguese broadband market is rapidly expand<strong>in</strong>g. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per<br />

population stood at 8.3% at the end of 2004, as compared to 6.4% six month earlier. In percentages, this<br />

represents an impressive 29.8% growth from 660 000 to 860 000 million <strong>in</strong> just half a year. Of that total, 428<br />

000 million are DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 49.7%, up from 44.8% at the end of June; the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 433 000, or<br />

50.3% are overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly provided by cable, with a small and decreas<strong>in</strong>g share, currently stand<strong>in</strong>g at 0.4%,<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g of dedicated access by other technologies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g fixed wireless access 393 . This puts Portugal <strong>in</strong> the<br />

uncommon position of a parity between DSL and cable as the ma<strong>in</strong> broadband vehicle at this already advanced<br />

stage, although DSL is grow<strong>in</strong>g faster, as it is <strong>in</strong> most other countries. However, it should be noted that both<br />

networks belong to the same operator, which seriously limits <strong>in</strong>frastructure-based competition. The DSL market<br />

is overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly controlled by Portugal Telecom and its subsidiaries, which account directly for 89.5% of<br />

DSL subscriptions, with another 8.7% retailed on their <strong>in</strong>frastructure by other ISPs. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>uscule<br />

1.9% are unbundled DSL access l<strong>in</strong>es. 394<br />

Mobile broadband <strong>in</strong> Portugal is still at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. All three 2G operators have launched 3G networks 395 , but<br />

the two for which figures are available had only 46 000 subscribers between them <strong>in</strong> January 2005 396 .<br />

8.21.3 Broadband policy<br />

The National Broadband Initiative of Portugal currently <strong>in</strong> force is part of the wider Information Society Action<br />

Plan 397 , where it is chiefly <strong>in</strong>serted under the first of seven pillars, An Information Society for<br />

All, which focuses on the multiplication of digital connectivity, particularly by means of<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g Internet access and use more widespread. The NBIP sets out specific targets to be achieved<br />

by 2005, <strong>in</strong> particular that 50% of all households and enterprises will have broadband access to the Internet by<br />

then, which corresponds to an extremely ambitious target of a penetration of 18% by the end of this year 398 . To<br />

achieve the aims of the strategy there are several projects which are grouped under the themes of Infrastructure<br />

and Access; Multimedia Content; Broadband Usage; Bridg<strong>in</strong>g the Digital Divide and National Competitiveness.<br />

Broadband access <strong>in</strong> less favoured areas is facilitated by the establishment of Community Networks. <strong>Project</strong>s<br />

foreseen with<strong>in</strong> this measure <strong>in</strong>clude the build<strong>in</strong>g of new <strong>in</strong>frastructure, the shar<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>frastructure with private<br />

operators and tak<strong>in</strong>g advantage of exist<strong>in</strong>g public <strong>in</strong>frastructures. Portugal <strong>in</strong>tends to use Structural Funds to<br />

390<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

391<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

392<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005; <strong>in</strong>clude 3G networks<br />

393<br />

www.anacom.pt<br />

394<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

395<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

396<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

397<br />

IS policy development is entrusted to the Innovation and Knowledge Society Mission Unit (UMIC), strategically created with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

Presidency of the Council of M<strong>in</strong>isters.<br />

398<br />

Iniciativa Nacional para a Banda Larga, p. 44


Page 214 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g broadband to under-served areas. A social cohesion approach (us<strong>in</strong>g a rank<strong>in</strong>g model based on supply and<br />

demand-side criteria) and a market-based approach (us<strong>in</strong>g aggregation of public demand) are used to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

areas to be considered eligible for public co-f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

All central public adm<strong>in</strong>istration offices and hospitals are to be connected by broadband; achiev<strong>in</strong>g a broadbandconnected<br />

PC/pupil ratio superior to the EU average; establish<strong>in</strong>g at least 16 public access po<strong>in</strong>ts with<br />

broadband per 100,000 <strong>in</strong>habitants. In poorer municipalities access will be free. Concern<strong>in</strong>g SMEs, particularly<br />

important for Portugal, which lacks large companies, the two ma<strong>in</strong> targets are support<strong>in</strong>g broadband access and<br />

use <strong>in</strong> 10,000 SMEs by the end of 2005 and support<strong>in</strong>g the development of websites of 10,000 SMEs over the<br />

same period. Concern<strong>in</strong>g households, PC penetration should achieve 55% of households by the end of 2005<br />

through the creation of PC recycl<strong>in</strong>g centres and f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>centives. On content, the NBIP encourages the<br />

creation and implementation of 500 multimedia content and application projects by the end of 2005 399 .<br />

8.21.4 Conclusion<br />

Broadband development is clearly tak<strong>in</strong>g off very fast <strong>in</strong> Portugal. From June to December 2004, the penetration<br />

rate <strong>in</strong>creased by half and stands just under the EU average. Given the relatively poor recent performance of the<br />

overall Portuguese economy, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the significantly below-average <strong>in</strong>come of Portuguese households,<br />

it is quite an achievement that Portugal’s broadband density is on a par with countries such as Germany, Italy<br />

and Luxemburg. However, the policy has set some extremely ambitious goals, and while their creation has<br />

probably contributed to the fast growth, it can be questioned whether they can <strong>in</strong>deed be atta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

399 EU Commission, Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper Annexes of the “Communication Connect<strong>in</strong>g Europe at High Speed: National Broadband<br />

Strategies”, COM (2004) 369 of 12.5.2004


8.22 Slovakia<br />

8.22.1 Introduction<br />

Page 215 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Slovakia, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has 5 380 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of 49<br />

037 square km, which means that its population density is 109.7 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is thus<br />

close to the EU average. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 54% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.22.2 The broadband market<br />

Slovakia has an average usage of mobile telephony with a penetration rate of around 79%, a bit below EU<br />

average. It has however, together with Lithuania, the lowest density of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, equivalent to only 24.1% 400 of<br />

the population, which is extremely low even by the standards of the new member states. In addition, the fixedl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

density has recently seen the second-biggest decrease <strong>in</strong> the EU, aga<strong>in</strong> beh<strong>in</strong>d Lithuania. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

network, which was 86% digitalised at the end of 2003 401 , is still a virtual monopoly 402 , but the mobile telephony<br />

market is competitive. Slovak Telecom’s Eurotel has a 44.7% market share, while Orange has 55.3 403 .<br />

The Slovakian broadband market is expand<strong>in</strong>g after a late start (broadband offers have only been available s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

mid-2003), but at a still very low level. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per population stood<br />

at 0.9% at the end of 2004, as compared to 0.4% six month earlier. In percentages, this represents an explosive<br />

122.6% growth <strong>in</strong> just half a year, but <strong>in</strong> actual numbers it is an <strong>in</strong>crease of only 27 000, from 22 000 to 49 000<br />

million. Of that total, 4.4 million are DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 77.9%, up from 75.4% at the end of June. All of the<br />

DSL connections are directly controlled by Slovak Telecom and its subsidiaries. 404<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 22.1% of the market are provided by the cable network. In theory, Slovakia is very well<br />

positioned for <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition by cable companies, because it is among the lead<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong> cable<br />

TV penetration: 125 cable operators have reached more than 60% of households. However, there are very few<br />

Internet customers with cable TV connection, because most of the cable TV network needs upgrad<strong>in</strong>g before it<br />

can be used for broadband Internet access 405 . Only one of the cable operators provides broadband services.<br />

There was no 3G network operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Slovakia at the start of 2005, although both mobile operators offer GPRS<br />

services, and Eurotel furthermore offers EDGE services, too. Both are obliged to start 3G services no later than<br />

1 April 2006 406 .<br />

8.22.3 Broadband policy<br />

Slovakia is not only lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> broadband roll-out, but also <strong>in</strong> broadband policy. The National Policy on<br />

Electronic Communications (2003) did conta<strong>in</strong> a chapter about the desirability of broadband, but no specific<br />

measures. As recently as January 2004, a National Strategy for Information Society was approved which did not<br />

specifically mention broadband under its six priorities, which were a competitive environment, e-government,<br />

IS-education, e-commerce, IT research and onl<strong>in</strong>e trust.<br />

Slovakia’s broadband policy is thus very recent. The National Strategy for Broadband Internet Access has been<br />

approved by the government only on 13 April 2005. The strategy sets a fairly modest target of connect<strong>in</strong>g one <strong>in</strong><br />

10 Slovaks to the Internet by broadband by 2012. It assumes that state support will be provided for the<br />

construction of optical networks <strong>in</strong> poorer regions. The state also wants to contribute to the co-f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

EU funds. However, the Telecommunications M<strong>in</strong>istry has not yet calculated impacts on the state budget or the<br />

conditions for grant<strong>in</strong>g support, a fact that has been criticised by the F<strong>in</strong>ance M<strong>in</strong>istry 407 .<br />

400<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

401<br />

www.telecom.sk<br />

402<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

403<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

404<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

405<br />

Central and Eastern Europe Information Society Benchmarks, Country Analysis, September 2004, EU Commission<br />

406<br />

II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

407<br />

Pravda, 14.4.2005, quoted on aol.countrywatch.com


8.22.4 Conclusion<br />

Page 216 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Broadband <strong>in</strong> Slovakia is still <strong>in</strong> its <strong>in</strong>fancy. Penetration rates are lagg<strong>in</strong>g significantly beh<strong>in</strong>d not only all of the<br />

old member states bar Greece, but also beh<strong>in</strong>d most of the new member states. Moreover, a specific broadband<br />

policy has only been adopted very recently, aga<strong>in</strong> lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d most other member states. Given the low<br />

basel<strong>in</strong>e, very high growth rates are to be expected for the com<strong>in</strong>g years, but this may well be <strong>in</strong>sufficient to<br />

catch up with the EU: even with 100% growth each year <strong>in</strong> 2005, 2006 and 2007 Slovakia would still not reach<br />

the end of 2004 EU average penetration. On the positive side, the widespread availability of cable networks<br />

should eventually facilitate stronger <strong>in</strong>frastructure-based competition than <strong>in</strong> many other countries.


8.23 Slovenia<br />

8.23.1 Introduction<br />

Page 217 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Slovenia, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 May 2004, has 1 996 400 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of 20<br />

226 square km, which means that its population density is 98.4 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is thus <strong>in</strong><br />

the lower part of the EU range. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 78.1% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.23.2 The broadband market<br />

Slovenia has a one of the highest usages of mobile telephony among the new member states with a penetration<br />

rate of about 97%, far above EU average, but a low number of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, equivalent to only 40.8% 408 of the<br />

population. However, this is the highest fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density among the new member states bar Cyprus and Malta,<br />

and it is higher than Portugal’s. Furthermore, Slovenia is one of only three member states where fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

density is still grow<strong>in</strong>g strongly. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is still a virtual monopoly of Telekom Slovenije 409 . The<br />

mobile telephony market has some limited competition. Telekom Slovenije’s Mobitel has 79.6% market share,<br />

while Si.mobil has 19.3% and Western Wireless 1.1% 410 .<br />

The Slovenian broadband market is rapidly expand<strong>in</strong>g. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per<br />

population stood at 5.8% at the end of 2004, as compared to 3.8% six month earlier, a very high number for a<br />

new member state. Percentage-wise, this represents a very impressive 50.3% growth, although the actual<br />

numbers are fairly low due to the size of the country, from 76 000 to 115 000 <strong>in</strong> just half a year. Of that total, 74<br />

000 are DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 64.3%, down from 70.5% at the end of June, with cable account<strong>in</strong>g for the bulk<br />

of the rest (34%). Slovenia is thus <strong>in</strong> the unusual position of see<strong>in</strong>g cable subscription grow<strong>in</strong>g faster than DSL<br />

connections. The country has 230 000 cable TV subscriptions, which corresponds to about 30% of households;<br />

cable has therefore the potential to rema<strong>in</strong> a significant competitor while ADSL roll-out cont<strong>in</strong>ues. The DSL<br />

market is completely controlled by Telekom Slovenije and its subsidiaries, which account directly for 98.3% of<br />

DSL subscriptions, with the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 1.7% retailed on their <strong>in</strong>frastructure by other ISPs. There are no<br />

unbundled DSL access l<strong>in</strong>es. 411<br />

Concern<strong>in</strong>g Fixed Wireless Access, there is the Slovenian public wireless Internet network, based on Wireless<br />

Local Area Network, called NeoWLAN. It is Slovenia’s first public wireless access network us<strong>in</strong>g Wi-Fi<br />

technology, but currently covers only important parts of Ljubljana and some bus<strong>in</strong>ess and tourist areas <strong>in</strong> the rest<br />

of Slovenia; it is operated by Mobitel and Siol, the <strong>in</strong>cumbent’s ISP provider 412 . Mobile broadband <strong>in</strong> Slovenia is<br />

still at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant mobile operator Mobitel has launched a 3G network, but had only 3 500<br />

subscribers <strong>in</strong> January 2005 413 . Si.mobil has begun <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g EDGE.<br />

8.23.3 Broadband policy<br />

Slovenia adopted a Development Strategy For Broadband Data Networks <strong>in</strong> Slovenia <strong>in</strong> September 2004. This<br />

strategy sets the rather modest overall objective to enable access to broadband data networks by 2008 by all<br />

public <strong>in</strong>stitutions and a large majority of those residents who want it. In order to achieve this, it def<strong>in</strong>es 6<br />

priorities: data collection and broadband mapp<strong>in</strong>g, the development of underdeveloped regions with help from<br />

structural funds, the construction of open-access networks, an active role for local government, network access<br />

from different platforms and optical fibre-networks for educational and research <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

The need for an active role of local governments and for the development of underdeveloped regions are<br />

addressed jo<strong>in</strong>tly <strong>in</strong> the new method of comprehensive plann<strong>in</strong>g, the Integrated Regional Strategies for the<br />

Information Society (IRSIS), which will <strong>in</strong> turn be crucial tools for the use of structural funds (the whole of<br />

Slovenia is currently classified <strong>in</strong> the most favourable “objective 1” category). The budget for projects funded<br />

by ERDF, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Slovenia’s participation, amounts to SIT 3826m (16 mio €)<br />

408<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-<br />

NP-05-008/EN/KS-NP-05-008-EN.PDF (figure refes to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be signficant)<br />

409<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

410<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

411<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

412<br />

Development Strategy for Broadband Data Networks <strong>in</strong> the Republic of Slovenia; 2004. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information Society<br />

413<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005; accord<strong>in</strong>g to the source of footnote 2, there were already 9 000<br />

subscribers by March 2004


Page 218 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In terms of the construction of open-access networks, i.e. public access broadband networks that enable equal<br />

access by operators and service providers to all those connected to the network, the strategy envisages two<br />

options. One is the construction of a broadband access network owned by end users, which ends <strong>in</strong> a public<br />

access space <strong>in</strong> which network hubs are located and to which all <strong>in</strong>terested operators have access (“fibre<br />

condom<strong>in</strong>ium”). The other is the construction of broadband networks and pert<strong>in</strong>ent municipal <strong>in</strong>frastructures as<br />

public-private partnerships.<br />

A particular focus is put on broadband for educational and research <strong>in</strong>stitutes. The project “Broadband Internet<br />

to each student bed” has been allocated SIT 500m (2.1mio €), although the <strong>in</strong>tentions of upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the access<br />

to ARNES (Academic and Research Network of Slovenia) to optical fibre network is not concretised <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g. However, non-specified activities from the action plan are awarded SIT 250m (1.05 €) annually <strong>in</strong><br />

cooperation with local government 414 .<br />

8.23.4 Conclusion<br />

Broadband <strong>in</strong> Slovenia is fairly advanced for a new member state, lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d only Malta and Estonia, but<br />

ahead of Ireland and Greece. Growth rates are still high, and the relatively important presence of a cable<br />

network should provide for some competitive impetus. Given the mounta<strong>in</strong>ous topography, there is a risk that<br />

broadband development will be very uneven, which is however recognised <strong>in</strong> the national broadband strategy.<br />

414 Development Strategy for Broadband Data Networks <strong>in</strong> the Republic of Slovenia; 2004. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information Society


8.24 Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

8.24.1 Introduction<br />

Page 219 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong>, which has jo<strong>in</strong>ed the European Union on 1 January 1986, has 42 345 300 <strong>in</strong>habitants on a territory of 504<br />

782 square km, which means that its population density is 83.9 <strong>in</strong>habitants per square km. The density is thus <strong>in</strong><br />

the lower part of the EU range. Purchas<strong>in</strong>g-power adjusted GDP stood at 97.6% of the EU 25 average <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

8.24.2 The broadband market<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> has a high usage of mobile telephony with a penetration rate of about 96%, significantly above EU<br />

average, but a relatively low number of fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, equivalent to only 42.7% 415 of the population, among the<br />

lowest of the old member states. The fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network is still dom<strong>in</strong>ated by Telefónica; only around one fifth<br />

of the market by revenue is accounted for by its competitors 416 . The mobile telephony market is competitive.<br />

Telefónica Móviles has a 49.2% market share, while Vodafone has 26.3% and Amena 24.6% 417 .<br />

The Spanish broadband market is rapidly expand<strong>in</strong>g. Penetration as measured <strong>in</strong> broadband connections per<br />

population stood at 7.9% at the end of 2004 418 , as compared to 6% six month earlier. In total numbers, this<br />

represents an impressive 32.3% growth from 2.5 to 3.3 million <strong>in</strong> just half a year. Of that total, 2.6 millions are<br />

DSL, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 78.4%, down from 83.8% at the end of June, while cable provides the bulk of the other<br />

21.6%. Alternative technologies have m<strong>in</strong>uscule or very small market shares: powerl<strong>in</strong>e communications have<br />

0.04%, broadband satellite 0.06%, optical fibre 0.78% and fixed wireless access <strong>in</strong> the form of LMDS (local<br />

multipo<strong>in</strong>t distribution services) have 2.7% 419 . In June 2004, 93% of the population were covered by DSL<br />

networks 420 ; the DSL market is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by Telefónica and its subsidiaries, which account directly for 69.8%<br />

of DSL subscriptions, with another 26.6% retailed on their <strong>in</strong>frastructure by other ISPs. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 3.6% are<br />

unbundled DSL or shared access l<strong>in</strong>es. 421<br />

The overall figures mask a significant disparity <strong>in</strong> regional broadband development. On the positive side, aboveaverage<br />

performance is not limited to the biggest metropolitan areas and their surround<strong>in</strong>gs suspects, i.e. Madrid<br />

and Barcelona (Cataluña), but also <strong>in</strong>cludes areas such as the Balear islands and the Basque country. On the<br />

negative side, the regions at the end, i.e. Extremadura, Castilla-La Mancha and Castilla y Leon lag significantly<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d, and are unlikely to catch up quickly, s<strong>in</strong>ce they are th<strong>in</strong>ly populated rural areas with at least a good part<br />

of their territory fairly remote. It has however to be noted that Extremadura <strong>in</strong> particular has put <strong>in</strong> place a<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ed programme of public access po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

Mobile broadband <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> is still at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. Two of the three 2G operators have launched 3G networks,<br />

but had only 105 000 subscribers between them <strong>in</strong> January 2005 422 .<br />

415<br />

Eurostat, Statistics <strong>in</strong> Focus 8/2005: Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> Europe, 7.2.2005, (figure refers to 2003, but any change is unlikely to be<br />

significant)<br />

416<br />

Annex II to European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 (10th report), {COM(2004)759 f<strong>in</strong>al}, 2.12.2004<br />

417<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005<br />

418<br />

By the end of February 2005, penetration had reached 8.7% (3.6 million) - CNN+ onl<strong>in</strong>e, 17.3.2005<br />

419<br />

La Sociedad de la Información en España 2004, p. 71 ; Report issued by Telefónica 2005<br />

420<br />

COLLECTIVITES TERRITORIALES et HAUT DEBIT : Espagne. L’<strong>in</strong>tervention publique dans le marché du haut débit. Etude réalisée<br />

par le Cab<strong>in</strong>et Analysys pour le compte de l’Autorité de régulation des télécommunications et la Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations ;<br />

Avril 2005<br />

421<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

422<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005


Page 220 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 70: Broadband penetration <strong>in</strong> number of accesses per 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants. Source: La Sociedad de la<br />

Información en España 2004, p. 74 ; report issued by Telefónica 2005. MC = cable modem; data are<br />

estimations for September 2004


8.24.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 221 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The M<strong>in</strong>istry of Science and Technology launched the “Broadband Strategy <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>” based on three ma<strong>in</strong><br />

goals: promot<strong>in</strong>g the availability of broadband connectivity and services, particularly <strong>in</strong> rural and less favoured<br />

areas; encourag<strong>in</strong>g the use of new Information Society services among the less favoured communities; and<br />

promot<strong>in</strong>g the use of ICT for economic growth. The current objective is a 10% penetration rate by the end of<br />

2005, with no region below 8% 423 .<br />

On the <strong>in</strong>frastructure side, the EU has recently approved the “National programme for the roll-out of broadband<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural and remote areas”, for which the Spanish authorities have earmarked a total of €26.4m <strong>in</strong> direct grants<br />

and €111.9m <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest-free loans for the period from 2005 to 2008. Under the programme, which will be cof<strong>in</strong>anced<br />

by EU funds, providers of electronic communications services may submit proposals for provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

broadband <strong>in</strong> specific areas where such services are currently not available. The scheme does not favour a<br />

specific technology and enables open access for third party providers. 424 Some regions are also provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

substantial fund<strong>in</strong>g: broadband laggard Castilla y Léon has earmarked 80 mio € for network rollout <strong>in</strong> 2004-<br />

2006, while broadband leader Catalunya has foreseen129 mio € 425 .<br />

On the content side, several programmes have been launched. The España.es <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>formationsociety<br />

strategies and aims at the development of the electronic adm<strong>in</strong>istration. Under the programmes run by<br />

Red.es, a public bus<strong>in</strong>ess entity attached to the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Industry, Tourism and Commerce, it is foreseen to<br />

offer satellite access to up to 4000 schools and libraries by the end of 2006 426 . More than € 30 million have been<br />

earmarked to provide libraries of at least 1,500 municipalities with satellite connections The educacion.es<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative aims at improv<strong>in</strong>g the educational system through improved access, teacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, and web site with<br />

relevant content and services 427 .<br />

8.24.4 Conclusion<br />

Broadband development is clearly tak<strong>in</strong>g off very fast <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>. From June 2004 to February 2005, the<br />

penetration rate <strong>in</strong>creased by half and stands just under the EU average, which is quite an achievement, given<br />

the low population density, although it could be argued that the urban areas where penetration is highest actually<br />

have a higher population density than comparable cities <strong>in</strong> other member states. Spa<strong>in</strong> is on its way to achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the self-def<strong>in</strong>ed objective of a 10% penetration rate even before the target date of the end of 2005. However, it<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s to be seen whether <strong>in</strong>deed no region will be below 8%, as is envisaged.<br />

423<br />

EU Commission, Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper Annexes of the “Communication Connect<strong>in</strong>g Europe at High Speed: National Broadband<br />

Strategies”, COM (2004) 369 of 12.5.2004<br />

424 TH<br />

COMMISSION PRESS RELEASE IP/05/398, BRUSSELS, 7 APRIL 2005<br />

425<br />

Source: ECTA<br />

426<br />

http://www.red.es/prensa/documentos/Dossier_<strong>in</strong>g.pdf<br />

427<br />

European Mobile Communications Report, Issue 189 – February 2005


8.25 Sweden<br />

8.25.1 Introduction<br />

Page 222 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The Swedish populations is heavily concentrated, with three highly populated small areas (Stockholm, Malmo<br />

and Gothenborg) and the vast northern part of the country only th<strong>in</strong>ly populated. Stockholm has 765 000,<br />

Gothenborg 480 000 and Malmo 270 000 out of a population of more than 9 million. 428 Sweden has a PPPadjusted<br />

GDP per capita of 28 900 US <strong>in</strong> 2003. The EU-15 average is 27 300 US-$ and OECD average is 26<br />

300. 429 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the new OECD GDP comparisons based on PPP, Sweden is a high middle <strong>in</strong>come country<br />

with a score of 106 and ranks 13 th <strong>in</strong> this statistic. 430 However, <strong>in</strong> context with BB uptake for <strong>in</strong>stance the US<br />

(11 th ) and Ireland (25 th ) are beh<strong>in</strong>d Sweden despite a (considerable) higher GDP (US has a GDP per capita of 37<br />

600 US and Ireland of 33 200 US) per capita.<br />

In the Information Society Index 2004 by IDC, Sweden lost its first place to Denmark and now ranks second. 431<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the OECD, <strong>in</strong> June 2004 Sweden ranked 9 th <strong>in</strong> terms of BB uptake with a total of 12.3% per 100<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants us<strong>in</strong>g BB Internet. 432<br />

Tak<strong>in</strong>g a more long term view, Sweden is the global leader <strong>in</strong> “other access platforms” (Fiber <strong>in</strong> particular) In<br />

Sweden 2.2% of the population have (faster) BB access via other platforms (even ahead of South Korea where<br />

2% access the Internet via other platforms). The OECD (cit<strong>in</strong>g Skanova) reports that 91% of all households and<br />

95% of all companies are located <strong>in</strong> areas connected by a fibre optic backbone. 433 Due to the <strong>in</strong>herent<br />

technological transmission limitations of xDSL and cable, Fiber networks are more promis<strong>in</strong>g with respect to<br />

bandwidth <strong>in</strong>tensive services such as IP broadcast<strong>in</strong>g and HDTV over Internet. What are the reasons for this<br />

Swedish success story? 434<br />

Sources <strong>in</strong>clude two OECD reports, the ISA website (Best Practises) 435 and a report published by the NRA (PTS)<br />

on broadband <strong>in</strong> particular 436 , as well as the ITS website 437<br />

8.25.2 The broadband market<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the NRA (PTS), 1.4 million Swedish households can connect to BB Internet (“technically possible<br />

subscriptions”) which translates <strong>in</strong>to around 33% of all households. From 2003, this is an <strong>in</strong>crease of 20%. In<br />

2003, the number of private end users <strong>in</strong>creased by 30%. In 2004, around 868 000 private customers (or 20% of<br />

the households) had BB Internet access. Thus, the uptake rate among private households is very high: 33% of all<br />

households are connected and 20% actually subscribe to BB.<br />

8.25.2.1 Demand<br />

In 2004, PC penetration stood at 80%, and more than 90% of the all persons aged 16-24 had a computer at home<br />

and access to the Internet. Even 65% of the persons aged between 55-74 had access to the Internet. 438 However,<br />

“usage” requires <strong>in</strong>terest and knowledge of the user. The Government produced a report which highlights the<br />

importance (and government focus on) develop<strong>in</strong>g IT skills. 439 In addition, SCB (Statistics Sweden) regularly<br />

conducts studies on use of IT <strong>in</strong> enterprises 440 and private <strong>in</strong>dividuals. 441<br />

428<br />

http://www.scb.se/templates/Publikation____119725.asp<br />

429<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/5/34244925.xls<br />

430<br />

http://www.oecd.org/document/15/0,2340,en_2649_201185_34256911_1_1_1_1,00.html<br />

431<br />

http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?conta<strong>in</strong>erId=pr2004_10_28_164010<br />

432<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/19/42/34082810.xls<br />

433<br />

OECD (2004) The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas; Available at<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf. p. 39-40. cited as OECD (2004), Development.<br />

434<br />

Insiders responded to the question “Why is Sweden so good at broadband?” that – <strong>in</strong> his view – the free exchange of ideas between<br />

Swedish companies really facilitates progress and that the work force is very well educated and there is plenty of talented people on the<br />

market. http://www.itsweden.com/docfile/4012_TV%20via%20broadband%20Sweden%20leads%20the%20way.pdf<br />

435<br />

http://www.isa.se/templates/Normal.aspx?id=2332<br />

436<br />

PTS (2004), Bredband i Sverige 2004; available at http://www.pts.se/Archive/Documents/SE/Bredband_i_Sverige_2004.pdf cited as<br />

PTS (2004).<br />

437<br />

http://www.itsweden.com/<br />

438<br />

http://www.scb.se/templates/publdb/katLista.asp?id=2125&produktnr=IT0102 (<strong>in</strong> Swedish)<br />

439<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry of Communication, The Development of IT Skills, http://www.itsweden.com/docfile/29709_n2000_076en.pdf<br />

440<br />

http://www.scb.se/templates/Product____15308.asp (<strong>in</strong> Swedish)<br />

441<br />

http://www.scb.se/templates/publdb/katLista.asp?id=2125&produktnr=IT0102 (<strong>in</strong> Swedish)


Page 223 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Swedes are very <strong>in</strong>terested and skilled <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g technology. More than 500 000 persons earned a European<br />

Computer Driver's License (ECDL) the only reconigzed <strong>in</strong>ternational standard for IT skills which is be<strong>in</strong>g found<br />

<strong>in</strong> more than 30 countries. 442 One of the currently most prom<strong>in</strong>ent Internet services is E-bank<strong>in</strong>g. Sweden is<br />

ranked number one <strong>in</strong> actual use of Netbank<strong>in</strong>g services with more than 51% of the Swedes logged on for more<br />

than one hour per month to E-bank<strong>in</strong>g services. 443<br />

It is not only young people who use the Internet, but also (wealthier) older people. For <strong>in</strong>stance, SeniorNet is a<br />

platform which specifically aims to bridge the divide between the old and the young, and it has 5500 members <strong>in</strong><br />

the age between 55 and 102. Members pay 200 SEK (around 20 Euro) per year. Bank<strong>in</strong>g group SEB and Telia<br />

offer support as well. Seniors use the Internet primarily for E-Government services, E-bank<strong>in</strong>g and travel<strong>in</strong>g. 444<br />

SCB reports that 96% of all enterprises with more than 10 employees used computers and almost 95% had<br />

access to the Internet. 445 There is no big difference between large and small Swedish companies. As for highspeed<br />

access <strong>in</strong> particular, <strong>in</strong> 2004 74% of all enterprises had a fast Internet connection (compared to 44% <strong>in</strong><br />

2001 and 62% <strong>in</strong> 2003). Further, 82% of Swedish companies had a website and 75% of companies with between<br />

10-19 employees had a web presence.<br />

8.25.2.2 Supply<br />

Sweden has an extensive BB network, and five backbone networks reach the northern part of the country. 446 The<br />

national Fibre and radio network extend to 185 000 km. All municipalities are connected to the national<br />

backbone and/or <strong>in</strong>terurban networks. 95% of Sweden's urban areas have connections to an <strong>in</strong>terurban network.<br />

All urban areas with more than 6000 <strong>in</strong>habitants have area networks <strong>in</strong> at least some part of the urban area. 45%<br />

of the urban areas with 200 to 249 <strong>in</strong>habitants have area networks. The national average for urban with area<br />

networks is 65%. In the remote northern areas “only” half of the urban areas are connected. 447<br />

The uptake and penetration levels are very high <strong>in</strong> Sweden despite the fact that less than 20% of the whole<br />

population lives <strong>in</strong> the three largest cities. See annex for a map of the five backbone networks which connect<br />

the northern regions. A rather strong government commitment (and not prime reliance on market forces) seems<br />

necessary to achieve a high penetration and uptake rate under those geographic circumstances. See also part 3 on<br />

public policy.<br />

8.25.2.3 Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Pric<strong>in</strong>g for access and download limits are a major factor with respect to usage/subscription rates <strong>in</strong> particular.<br />

The OECD reports that the entrance of Bredbandsbolaget exhibited a downward pressure on prices and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased the BB uptake rates. Over time, however, prices <strong>in</strong>creased and Sweden fell from 2 nd rank <strong>in</strong> 2001 to 7 th<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2003 of the OECD BB rank<strong>in</strong>g. Thus, access pric<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>ly plays a major role <strong>in</strong> the uptake rates. 448<br />

Infrastructure competition is a key driver to lower prices and <strong>in</strong>crease BB uptake rates <strong>in</strong> turn. In this respect,<br />

former Swedish telecom <strong>in</strong>cumbent Telia and its F<strong>in</strong>nish counterpart Sonera merged <strong>in</strong> 2002. In order to receive<br />

the approval of the European Commission, Comhem, the cable unit, needed to be divested. The OECD reports<br />

that this had a positive <strong>in</strong>fluence on pric<strong>in</strong>g as well. 449<br />

Another important po<strong>in</strong>t with respect to <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition is Stokab. Stokab is a network owned by the<br />

City of Stockholm where the Board of Directors consists of political appo<strong>in</strong>tees represent<strong>in</strong>g the City of<br />

Stockholm. 450 The company owns and operates a secure and accessible fibre optic network and leases dark fibre<br />

to various companies (e.g. banks and <strong>in</strong>surance companies) and municipalities on a non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory basis.<br />

Stokab does not provide retail services or offer any managed service. One important benefit of Stokab is that<br />

there is a high degree of co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation between the City of Stockholm and the company with respect to rights of<br />

ways.<br />

442 http://www.sweden.se/templates/cs/BasicFactsheet____3693.aspx<br />

443 http://www.isa.se/upload/english/BestPractices/Sweden_the_future_is_here_and_its_scand<strong>in</strong>avian.pdf<br />

444 http://www.isa.se/upload/Filer/pdf/Older_people_play_their_part_<strong>in</strong>_Swedens_Internet_revolution_2.pdf<br />

445 http://www.scb.se/templates/publdb/publikation____2725.asp&plopnr=2056<br />

446 Annex I shows the five Swedish backbone networks.<br />

447 PTS (2004), p. 5-6.<br />

448 OECD (2004): Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Prices <strong>in</strong> the OECD, p. p. 53-54. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/17/32143101.pdf . Cited as<br />

OECD (2004), Prices.<br />

449 OECD (2004), Prices, p. 53.<br />

450 The City of Ottawa has a list of other Community BB projects. http://ottawa.ca/city_services/plann<strong>in</strong>gzon<strong>in</strong>g/2020/bb/appen_d_en.shtml


Company Access type Payment plan Speed (Kbps)<br />

Incumbent<br />

Page 224 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Monthly<br />

charge<br />

($/PPP)<br />

Download<br />

Limit<br />

Installation<br />

charge ($)<br />

Telia ADSL Telia BB 250 250/64 31 Unlimited 72<br />

Telia ADSL Telia BB 500 500/400 39 Unlimited 72<br />

Telia ADSL Telia BB 2000 2048/400 49 10 GB 72<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

Tele2 ADSL Tele2 BB ADSL 500/4-500 37 Unlimited 62<br />

Glocalnet ADSL 500 37 Unlimited 51<br />

Bostream ADSL istream 500 31 Unlimited 207<br />

Bostream ADSL Xstream 2500/768 47 Unlimited 259<br />

Bostream VDSL Scream 26MB/26MB 41 Unlimited 259<br />

Alternative Infrastructure<br />

ComHem Cable Internet Cable 250 250/64 23 Unlimited 41<br />

ComHem Cable InternetCable 2000 512/128 41 Unlimited 41<br />

UPC Cable Chello classic 640/256 36 Unlimited 51<br />

UPC Cable Chello plus 1024/384 41 Unlimited 36<br />

Tele2 Cable Tele2 BB Cable 512/128 26 Unlimited 62<br />

Bredbandsbolaget Ethernet<br />

LAN<br />

BB 10 MB 33 Unlimited 51<br />

Bredbandsb DSL BB 10 MB 41 Unlimited 207<br />

Table 41: BB Access Prices <strong>in</strong> Sweden, October 2003<br />

Infrastructure competition is a key driver to lower prices and <strong>in</strong>crease BB uptake rates <strong>in</strong> turn. In this respect,<br />

former Swedish telecom <strong>in</strong>cumbent Telia and its F<strong>in</strong>nish counterpart Sonera merged <strong>in</strong> 2002. In order to receive<br />

the approval of the European Commission, Comhem, the cable unit, needed to be divested. The OECD reports<br />

that this had a positive <strong>in</strong>fluence on pric<strong>in</strong>g as well. 451<br />

Another important po<strong>in</strong>t with respect to <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition is Stokab. Stokab is a network owned by the<br />

City of Stockholm where the Board of Directors consists of political appo<strong>in</strong>tees represent<strong>in</strong>g the City of<br />

Stockholm. 452 The company owns and operates a secure and accessible fibre optic network and leases dark fibre<br />

to various companies (e.g. banks and <strong>in</strong>surance companies) and municipalities on a non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory basis.<br />

Stokab does not provide retail services or offer any managed service. One important benefit of Stokab is that<br />

there is a high degree of co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation between the City of Stockholm and the company with respect to rights of<br />

ways.<br />

451 OECD (2004), Prices, p. 53.<br />

452 The City of Ottawa has a list of other Community BB projects. http://ottawa.ca/city_services/plann<strong>in</strong>gzon<strong>in</strong>g/2020/bb/appen_d_en.shtml


Page 225 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Innovative services are another important factor. Without such services users will not sign up for BB. Sweden is<br />

at the forefront <strong>in</strong> development of ICT products and services. Perhaps most notably, Skype and KaZaa are of<br />

Swedish orig<strong>in</strong>. The Swedish private and public sectors alike are us<strong>in</strong>g the communication possibilities of the<br />

Internet contribut<strong>in</strong>g to a range of <strong>in</strong>novative services mak<strong>in</strong>g users want to sign up for Broadband.<br />

As for BB <strong>in</strong>tensive Services, an example would be bett<strong>in</strong>g operator ATG which has launched full scale, live<br />

stream<strong>in</strong>g of horse races. 453 Also, it has been announced that broadband HDTV will – as the first country <strong>in</strong> the<br />

world – be offered <strong>in</strong> Sweden. 454 JM, Sweden's lead<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g developer offers some customers services which<br />

turn off the gas and water supply when the leave the house. Also, wash<strong>in</strong>g rooms can be controlled via the PC. 455<br />

Those are just a few examples to illustrate the lead<strong>in</strong>g position of Sweden <strong>in</strong> the development of BB<br />

applications.<br />

As for e-government, the project 24/7 Government 456 implements the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that people have a right to access<br />

government services at a time that suits them. 24/7 Government focuses on us<strong>in</strong>g state-of-the-art technologies<br />

for e-government applications and services 457 (customs, taxes, road adm<strong>in</strong>istration, competition authorities and<br />

government officies are the lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions). Tax returns can be filed onl<strong>in</strong>e, via SMS or via telephone. N<strong>in</strong>e<br />

out of ten Swedes can use this service.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, health care has always played a major role <strong>in</strong> Sweden. Consequently, e-Health services are strongly<br />

developed as well. For <strong>in</strong>stance, Carel<strong>in</strong>k 458 is a national cooperation to develop the use of IT <strong>in</strong> Swedish<br />

healthcare. One of the most important projects of Carel<strong>in</strong>k is Sjunet,a virtual private network connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Sweden's 80 public hospitals, 800 primary care centers, 900 pharmacies and some private health care<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions. Many BB <strong>in</strong>tensive services are possible such as videoconferenc<strong>in</strong>g, telephony services, secure file<br />

transfers (teleradiology, telepathology) and a range of web-services. Proven benefits relate to costs sav<strong>in</strong>gs (0.6<br />

million Euro annually), 459 better access and quality of care. 460<br />

8.25.3 Broadband policy<br />

Sweden sees Broadband as a utility and every citizen should have access to it. 461 This belief is also expressed <strong>in</strong><br />

the public policy and projects like Stokab described above. The strong commitment of the government to have<br />

affordable access to a high-speed <strong>in</strong>frastructure and the treatment of digital <strong>in</strong>formation like essential utilities<br />

such as water and electricity is one of the key factors for Sweden's lead<strong>in</strong>g position. In this respect, already <strong>in</strong><br />

June 2000, the Swedish government passed the “An Information Society for All” bill. Market forces are<br />

complemented by a considerable degree of co-ord<strong>in</strong>ated measures. Public fund<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>frastructure and the<br />

possibility to give as many competitors as possible an opportunity to use this network are key po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

On basis of Article 7 of the Framework Directive, 462 PTS notified the Commission about its measures it is go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to impose on SMP undertak<strong>in</strong>gs. In particular, PTS imposes the follow<strong>in</strong>g obligations on TeliaSonera (78%<br />

market share): access obligations, price regulation, non-discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, cost account<strong>in</strong>g and a reference offer. 463<br />

The Swedish NRA ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a website which lists prices for various services and contact details of<br />

companies. 464 In their FAQ, the website also mentions an application which allows consumers to check whether<br />

the promised BB speed is <strong>in</strong>deed available to them. ISA 465 (as a public entity) has a useful search eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g people to search for companies with<strong>in</strong> the BB market. Information that can be searched for <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

453<br />

Invest <strong>in</strong> Sweden Agency Broadband Sweden (2004); http://www.itsweden.com/docfile/35972_Broadband_30_8.pdf ((last visited 22.<br />

March 2005))<br />

454<br />

http://www.itsweden.com/ma<strong>in</strong>.aspx?id=13&type=news&newsid=3635<br />

455<br />

http://www.isa.se/upload/english/BestPractices/Sweden_the_future_is_here_and_its_scand<strong>in</strong>avian.pdf<br />

456<br />

http://www.24-timmarsmyndigheten.se/DynPage.aspx?id=186<br />

457<br />

In 75% of Swedens 289 municipalities parents can sign up preschool children for an open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> day care centers.<br />

458<br />

http://www.carel<strong>in</strong>k.se/pages/newsbill.asp?VersionID=1&Pages=1,124 Founders of Carel<strong>in</strong>k are the Federation of County Councils, the<br />

Swedish Association of Local Authorities, the Swedish Pharmacy cha<strong>in</strong>, and the Association of Private Care Providers. (last visited 22.<br />

March 2005)<br />

459<br />

The biggest cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs resulted from expensive ISDN l<strong>in</strong>es, improved collaboration, lower staff costs and less physical transportation.<br />

460<br />

For details of Sjunet: http://www.ehto.org/ehealth2003/sjunet.html (last visited 22. March 2005)<br />

461<br />

For an overview over Swedish regulatory measures see ollow-up of Swedish Government IT Policy (2002),<br />

http://www.itsweden.com/docfile/68612_ITuppf_eng.pdf<br />

462<br />

Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic<br />

communications networks and services (the “Framework Directive”), OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 33.<br />

463<br />

http://www.pts.se/Archive/Documents/EN/Com_decision_Broadband_20040702.pdf<br />

464<br />

http://host<strong>in</strong>g.ibitec.se/pts/Default.aspx<br />

465<br />

ISA is is the government agency assist<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g foreign <strong>in</strong>vestors about bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities <strong>in</strong> Sweden.


Page 226 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

which companies are provid<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess and residential access services, who are FWA license holders, which<br />

BB companies offer access to national and local BB <strong>in</strong>frastructure. 466<br />

The “government” is also actively <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> (fibre) <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The lead<strong>in</strong>g position of Sweden <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

fibre networks is to a large degree attributable to those “<strong>in</strong>terventions”. More than 1 billion US $ have been<br />

allocated to implement the national BB strategy and 300 million were used for a rollout of high speed Internet<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure (not only fibre) f<strong>in</strong>anced on commercial grounds. 467<br />

A fibre network was built by the state owned electrical utility company and <strong>in</strong> 2003 the national Swedish Grid<br />

had reached 215 of the 290 municipalities. 468 Municipalities can receive fund<strong>in</strong>g if they connect to the national<br />

backbone. In 2004, the government funded municipalities with 1 900 million Kroner (more than 200 million<br />

Euro). 469<br />

Municipalities which are sparsely populated 470 and unlikely to have a commercial development of a fibre optic<br />

network with<strong>in</strong> five years can apply for the development of regional networks. This scheme covers 30% of the<br />

Swedish population. 322 million US were allocated over a five year period. Two other conditions for fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the regional networks are that at least 5% of the costs need to be contributed by the municipality and an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent operator needs to run the network. In addition to national and regional networks, the rollout of local<br />

networks is also subsidized. In a five year period, 391 million US have been allocated for the development of<br />

local networks. 471<br />

As a result of those measures, by June 2003 270 communities had received fund<strong>in</strong>g and 53 networks were be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

deployed. In the private sector, Skanova (the network division of the <strong>in</strong>cumbent Telia which provides access on<br />

a non-discrim<strong>in</strong>atory basis to competitors) has been a major beneficiary on the supply side of those measures.<br />

Many municipalities were able to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> the rollout of xDSL networks and contracted with Skanova.<br />

Last – but by no means least -, tax <strong>in</strong>centives are granted for bus<strong>in</strong>ess and residential tax payers who sign up for<br />

BB services. 50% of the costs are deductible up to a maximum of 5000 SEK. 472<br />

Conclusion<br />

Sweden is a global leader <strong>in</strong> terms of fibre penetration and uptake. To a large degree this can be attributed to<br />

government action plans and national and regional fund<strong>in</strong>g schemes. As another key factor, many <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

services are be<strong>in</strong>g developed, tested and first put on the market <strong>in</strong> Sweden. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly, the openness,<br />

technological skills and attitude of Swedish people towards technology <strong>in</strong> general and the Internet <strong>in</strong> particular<br />

are major reasons why Sweden is “so good at Broadband”.<br />

466<br />

http://www.isa.se/templates/BroadbandDB____25829.aspx<br />

467<br />

OECD (2004), Development, p. 39-40<br />

468<br />

OECD (2004), Development, p. 39-40<br />

469<br />

PTS (2004), p.85.<br />

470<br />

Follow-up of Swedish Government IT Policy (2002), p. 12-15. http://www.itsweden.com/docfile/68612_ITuppf_eng.pdf<br />

471<br />

OECD (2004), Development, p. 39-40<br />

472<br />

Follow-up of Swedish Government IT Policy (2002), p. 12-15. http://www.itsweden.com/docfile/68612_ITuppf_eng.pdf


8.25.4 Appendix<br />

Page 227 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 71: The six backbone networks (taken from the 2004 PTS report “Bredband i Sverige 2004, p. 90-95)


8.26 The Netherlands<br />

8.26.1 Introduction<br />

Page 228 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The Netherlands are one of the wealthiest nations. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the OECD, GDP per capita accounted for US $<br />

30 300 (EU15 average is US $ 27 300). 473 The Netherlands rank 9 th and is a “high middle <strong>in</strong>come group” with a<br />

score of 103. 474 . They also have a very low rural population with 10.4% (the OECD average is 22.9%) 475 and the<br />

most people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the area Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Utrecht and a few other cities.<br />

The Dutch government is very active and has ambitous plans <strong>in</strong> terms of BB, outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a recent paper<br />

published by the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Economics entitled The Broadband Paper: A Question of Pace and Better<br />

Utilisation. 476 Part three of this case study is largely based on this source.<br />

8.26.2 The broadband market<br />

The Netherlands are <strong>in</strong> a lead<strong>in</strong>g position <strong>in</strong> Europe when it comes to BB uptake. In January 2004, the uptake<br />

rate was 11.9% of the total population – almost double the EU average of 6%. 477 Even more, <strong>in</strong>ternationally the<br />

Netherlands rank 2 nd <strong>in</strong> terms of growth <strong>in</strong> BB uptake rate between July 2003 and January 2004 beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land. 478 The Netherlands is one of the few countries where there is roughly the same amount of cable and<br />

DSL users, i.e. a high degree of <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition.<br />

A high GDP per capita and fair distribution of <strong>in</strong>come, the high degree of <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition,<br />

consequently low prices and an open attitude of Dutch people towards Internet technologies are among the chief<br />

(rather static) reasons which expla<strong>in</strong> this high uptake rate. In addition, the Kenniswijk project <strong>in</strong> E<strong>in</strong>dhoven (see<br />

below) is a promis<strong>in</strong>g public-private partnership program which for the collaborative test<strong>in</strong>g and development of<br />

new BB services. At the same time, it <strong>in</strong>creases demand for BB applications from consumers who can get<br />

subsidised access to those <strong>in</strong>novative services over high speed fibre networks.<br />

As <strong>in</strong> most other European Countries (with the exception of Sweden and Italy), the most promis<strong>in</strong>g FTTH<br />

technology is only be<strong>in</strong>g deployed on a very limited basis. FTTH <strong>in</strong>itiatives are underway <strong>in</strong> some selected<br />

citites (e.g. E<strong>in</strong>dhoven and the Kenniswijk project) but <strong>in</strong> the majority of the country fibre is not (yet) available<br />

with the municipalities of Amsterdam and Rotterdam start<strong>in</strong>g to adopt rollout measures (see below).<br />

8.26.2.1 Kenniswijk<br />

Kenniswijk 479 is a public-private co-operation with 27 share holders (<strong>in</strong>ter alia Shell, Deloitte&Touche, Philips<br />

Alcatel). It is a large-scale broadband experiment <strong>in</strong> the E<strong>in</strong>dhoven region where <strong>in</strong>novative consumer BB<br />

services are be<strong>in</strong>g developed and tested on high speed fibre networks. The project is funded by the Dutch<br />

General Directorate of Telecommunication and Post (DGTP) of the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Economics. As of February<br />

2005, 30 BB services were offered <strong>in</strong> a selected area <strong>in</strong> E<strong>in</strong>dhoven relat<strong>in</strong>g to enterta<strong>in</strong>ment content (e.g. Movieon-demand;<br />

LiveTV; Vl<strong>in</strong>derTV; Lifestyle TV), education (e-campus; Rutlkng2me; Ontdeknet), e-commerce<br />

(Kadol<strong>in</strong>e; Way2Pay), health (Heartspo<strong>in</strong>t; brighten your life; web tra<strong>in</strong>er), and culture (Van Abbe Video Tour;<br />

TheaterTV Het Kle<strong>in</strong>).<br />

Kenniswijk BV offeres subsidies (up to € 500 for the connection and € 300 for the first year) to consumers who<br />

sign up for FTTH. In addition, consumers who are will<strong>in</strong>g to set up their own Kenniswijk <strong>Project</strong> can receive up<br />

to 80% of the <strong>in</strong>vestment costs refunded. Companies can apply for subsidies if they develop <strong>in</strong>novative BB<br />

services and want to offer them <strong>in</strong> the Kenniswijk region. 480 It also offers five courses (club-membership<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration, mak<strong>in</strong>g music-CDs, process<strong>in</strong>g photos, build<strong>in</strong>g websites and process<strong>in</strong>g videos).<br />

Freeband Kennisimpuls is another public-private research project and compromises more than 40 (non-)<br />

commercial organisations. Focus lies on research<strong>in</strong>g 4G BB mobile networks. 481<br />

473 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/5/34244925.xls<br />

474 http://www.oecd.org/document/15/0,2340,en_2649_201185_34256911_1_1_1_1,00.html<br />

475 OECD (2004) The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas; p. 71. (OECD 2004). Available at<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf.<br />

476 http://apps.ez.nl/publicaties/pdfs/04TP27.pdf<br />

477 EU Commission, Summary of National BB Strategies (“Summary”) April 2004, p. 16.<br />

http://europa.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/<strong>in</strong>formation_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/broadband/com_broadband_en.doc<br />

478 EU Commission, Summary of National BB Strategies (“Summary”) April 2004, p. 17.<br />

http://europa.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/<strong>in</strong>formation_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/broadband/com_broadband_en.doc.<br />

479 http://www.kenniswijk.nl<br />

480 http://www.kenniswijk.nl/personal/en/jsahtml/statichomepage/jsptemplates/subsidies.jsp<br />

481 http://www.freeband.nl/kennisimpuls/EN<strong>in</strong>dex.html


8.26.2.2 Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Company Access type Payment plan Speed (Kbps/MB)<br />

Incumbent<br />

Page 229 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Monthly<br />

charge<br />

($/PPP)<br />

Download<br />

Limit (MB)<br />

Installation<br />

charge<br />

($/PPP)<br />

KPN ADSL ADSL Lite 384/96 37 N/A 79<br />

KPN ADSL ADSL Basic 1024/160 55 N/A 79<br />

KPN ADSL ADSL Extra 2048/320 92 N/A 79<br />

Planet ADSL ADSL Standart 384/96 37 1000 79<br />

Planet ADSL ADSL Advanced 1024/160 55 Unlimited 79<br />

Planet ADSL ADSL comfort 2048/320 93 Unlimited 79<br />

Het Net ADSL ADSL Vooldeel 384/96 26 250 79<br />

Het Net ADSL ADSL Surfen 384/96 35 1500 79<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

Zon ADSL Bredband Budget 324/128 21 250 0<br />

Zon ADSL Bredband Extra 2048/320 88 Unlimited 79<br />

Tiscali ADSL ADSL Start 324/128 20 1000 0<br />

Tiscali ADSL ADSL Live! 3072/512 52 20 000 0<br />

Cistron ADSL A1024 1024/512 51 20 000 0<br />

Cistron ADSL Maxx 8192/1024 83 100 000 0<br />

Alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

UPC CATV Chello Light 300/64 33 1 000 63<br />

UPC CATV Chello Classic 1500/128 48 Unlimited 63<br />

UPC CATV Chello Plus 3000/384 78 Unlimited 63<br />

Essent Kabe. CATV @home Basic 312 31 Unlimited 0<br />

Essent Kabelcom CATV @home Breedband 2580 50 Unlimited 0<br />

Table 42: Selected Broadband prices <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands October 2003 482<br />

482 OECD (2004): Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Prices <strong>in</strong> the OECD, p. p. 42-43. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/17/32143101.pdf .


Page 230 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The Netherlands stand out because of its extensive cable network competition and its many BB providers.<br />

Chello Cable is the dom<strong>in</strong>ant ISP BB provider followed by Planet ADSL, Wannadoo cable/DSL and @Home<br />

Cable. 483 BB customers <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands pay comparably low prices for BB access services. Low prices and<br />

high uptake rates can to a large degree be attributed to the high level of <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition between cable<br />

and DSL networks. In this respect, upgraded cable networks pass 79% of all households (the OECD average is<br />

42%). 484 In Europe, Denmark, Belgium and The Netherlands are not only lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terms of BB uptake rates,<br />

but have also the highest degree of facilities-based competition. 485<br />

8.26.3 Broadband policy<br />

In its Broadband Paper, the Dutch Government describes its ambitions and vision for BB development. The<br />

paper <strong>in</strong>vestigates how BB can make an optimal contribution to the economy. 486 14 Actions are separated <strong>in</strong>to<br />

four tracks (dialogue and research, co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation, stimulation and regulations) and fund<strong>in</strong>g for the actions <strong>in</strong><br />

2004 accounts for € 13 300 000. 487 Kenniswijk and Broadband <strong>in</strong> Four Social Sectors are the most funded<br />

projects (€ 9 000 000 and € 2 400 000 respectively).<br />

Track One has two actions and relates to facilitat<strong>in</strong>g a dialogue between market players, municipalities and<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial authorities (see the sett<strong>in</strong>g up of specialized BB <strong>in</strong>stitutions). Moreover, research relat<strong>in</strong>g to new<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutional forms for adm<strong>in</strong>istrative and operational activities and the protection of public <strong>in</strong>terest are<br />

conducted. Also, costs and benefits of different regulation schemes are conducted with<strong>in</strong> this action plan. 488<br />

Track Two has two actions (development of guidel<strong>in</strong>es and regular formal adm<strong>in</strong>istrative talks). In order to<br />

achieve a consistent government policy, guidel<strong>in</strong>es are be<strong>in</strong>g developed for lower tiers of government and<br />

hous<strong>in</strong>g corporations. Those guidel<strong>in</strong>es complement legislation and regulation. The development of BB requires<br />

a certa<strong>in</strong> degree of co-ord<strong>in</strong>ation among market participants and government <strong>in</strong>istutions. Small scale <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the public sector are prevented from tak<strong>in</strong>g place. In particular, adm<strong>in</strong>istrative and technological<br />

fragmentation is avoided and the role of municipal authorities is to be strengthened. 489<br />

Track Three conta<strong>in</strong>s seven actions. Four actions focus on “services” (Holland Broadband Land, Broadband <strong>in</strong><br />

four social sectors, conditions for use, Kenniswijk) and three on “<strong>in</strong>frastructure” (The Broadband Circle,<br />

Broadband <strong>in</strong> urban policy and access to government build<strong>in</strong>gs). Generally, the goal is to form public-private<br />

partnerships (PPPs) which aim at the development and implementation of socially desirable services and<br />

products. In addition, access to public services is also promoted with<strong>in</strong> this track. 490<br />

Lastly, Track Four conta<strong>in</strong>s three actions (implementation of the Electronic Communication Act, excavaction of<br />

rights and copyrights).In addition, focus lies on remov<strong>in</strong>g restra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> terms of legislation and regulation. 491<br />

In addition to the priorities identified <strong>in</strong> the Broadband Paper, Dutch facilitation measures focus on establish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

dialogues between <strong>in</strong>dustry and governmental <strong>in</strong>stitutions and the sett<strong>in</strong>g up of special BB <strong>in</strong>stitutions. For<br />

example, the Smart Community International Network (SCIN), established <strong>in</strong> 2003 by the Dutch government,<br />

seeks to actively promote and support <strong>in</strong>ternational exchange and co-operation, jo<strong>in</strong>t research and development<br />

activities. Currently, three communities are <strong>in</strong>volved (City of Stockholm, Kenniswijk, and the multimedia Super<br />

Corridor <strong>in</strong> Malaysia). 492<br />

The Broadband Expert Group, established already <strong>in</strong> 2001, produced a report “Holland Broadband Land”. After<br />

this report, the Cab<strong>in</strong>et produced a BB Action program focus<strong>in</strong>g on stimulation, knowledge diffusion and the<br />

removal of obstacles <strong>in</strong> legislation and regulation. The Broadband Impulse Committee was established <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to steer the development of BB policy. Specifically, its task is to mobilise market participants and governments<br />

and to facilitate dialogue. 493 F<strong>in</strong>ally, the ICT Research and Innovation Authority has been set up which ensures<br />

483 OPTA (2004) Regulatory Policy Note 2, Infrastructure and service based competition <strong>in</strong> the BB market,p.4;<br />

http://www.opta.nl/download/RPN02.pdf<br />

484 OECD (2004) The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas; p. 71. (OECD 2004). Available at<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf.<br />

485 EU Commission, Summary of National BB Strategies (“Summary”) April 2004, p. 19.<br />

http://europa.eu.<strong>in</strong>t/<strong>in</strong>formation_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/broadband/com_broadband_en.doc.<br />

486 See also the five pillars described <strong>in</strong> the Commisson Paper Summary of National BB Strategies, p. 24.<br />

487 The Broadband Paper conta<strong>in</strong>s a list of 14 Actions and together with guarantueed expenditures. Broadband Paper p. 23-24.<br />

488 Broadband Paper (2004), p. 18.<br />

489 Broadband Paper (2004), p. 18.<br />

490 Broadband Paper (2004), p. 19.<br />

491 Broadband Paper (2004), p. 21.<br />

492 www.smartcommunity.nl.<br />

493 Broadband Paper (2004), p. 17-18.


Page 231 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

the structural <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> ICT research and the sett<strong>in</strong>g up of centres of excellence. One of the tasks is to draw up<br />

a national ICT research agenda. 494<br />

The Dutch market <strong>in</strong>tervention measures take the form of private-public partnerships rather than “traditional”<br />

public <strong>in</strong>terventions. Gridforum.nl 495 is a collaborative project between companies, universities and other public<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions. The project aims to be a focal po<strong>in</strong>t of Dutch Grid Comput<strong>in</strong>g and to br<strong>in</strong>g together expertise and<br />

<strong>in</strong>novative ideas from commercial and public sector.<br />

The GigaPort Next Generation Network is a jo<strong>in</strong>t project between the Dutch Government, the IT <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

educational and research <strong>in</strong>stitutes. Fund<strong>in</strong>g comes from the State and accounts for € 40 million. The goal is to<br />

provide a bridge between the knowledge <strong>in</strong>frastructure and the market. With<strong>in</strong> GigaPort, a next generation<br />

(research) network is be<strong>in</strong>g developed (SURFnet6) and the optical switch <strong>in</strong> Amsterdam is be<strong>in</strong>g expanded. 496<br />

SURFnet6 is primarily <strong>in</strong>tended for research <strong>in</strong>stitutions but companies can also connect <strong>in</strong> order to test new<br />

applications.<br />

Citynet Fiber Amsterdam 497 is owner of passive optical access network and ownership is shared with private<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestors. 450 000 homes and bus<strong>in</strong>esses should be connected by 2010. The municipality expects 53% of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>hab<strong>in</strong>tants are will<strong>in</strong>g to pay around € 50 for a connection. In Rotterdam, there is a city-owned (City<br />

Development Corporation) open access FTTH project which connects 5000 homes, 2000 apartments and 70000<br />

sqkm of office space. 498 The City of Rotterdam owns the collocation spots, duct and fiber (municipal network), a<br />

“communication operator” owns the opto-electronics and sells the bandwidth to service providers on a nondiscrim<strong>in</strong>atory<br />

basis.<br />

8.26.4 Conclusion<br />

The Netherlands are among the lead<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong> terms of BB uptake. Among the ma<strong>in</strong> (static) reasons are a<br />

high GDP, low rural population, high degree of <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition. However, the Dutch Government is<br />

also very active <strong>in</strong> its BB policy and part of the recent strong growth rates is attributable to the focused and<br />

ambitious measures and activities undertaken by private-public partnerships. In addition, various task forces<br />

have been set up with an exclusive focus on how to <strong>in</strong>crease BB uptake. Moreover, municipalities actively roll<br />

out fibre networks and research networks are also open to companies.<br />

494 M<strong>in</strong>istry of Economic Affairs, Compet<strong>in</strong>g with ICT Competences Action Plan (May 2004), p. 16-17.<br />

http://apps.ez.nl/publicaties/pdfs/04OI05.pdf<br />

495 http://gridforum.nl:8080/gridforum/vmp/articles/contentsen.html<br />

496 http://www.gigaport.nl/<strong>in</strong>fo/en/artikel_content.jsp?objectnumber=23477<br />

497 http://www.citynet.nl/<br />

498 http://www.obr.rotterdam.nl/


8.27 United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

8.27.1 Introduction<br />

Page 232 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

In U.K broadband is the term used to describe ”higher bandwidth, always-on services, offer<strong>in</strong>g data rates of<br />

128kbps and above”. Broadband services <strong>in</strong>clude high-capacity data transfer, video conferenc<strong>in</strong>g, video on<br />

demand, <strong>in</strong>teractive games and audio, onl<strong>in</strong>e bank<strong>in</strong>g and shopp<strong>in</strong>g, local area network (LAN) access and web<br />

services.<br />

There are currently a number of options available for the delivery of broadband. These <strong>in</strong>clude ADSL, fibre,<br />

cable, 3G mobile (with automatic switchover to GPRS when 3G coverage is not available), wireless, and<br />

satellite.<br />

8.27.2 The broadband market<br />

For fixed l<strong>in</strong>es, BT’s share of l<strong>in</strong>es is static at around 84%, but its share of revenues is now only 71%. Roughly<br />

50% of UK households - some 12 million homes - can now choose their direct-to-the-house fixed l<strong>in</strong>k telephone<br />

provider. As a result, residential fixed telecoms prices fell 7% <strong>in</strong> the year 2004. There are now over 15 million<br />

homes connected to the Internet, and the current number of broadband users is over 6 million at the end of 2004.<br />

There were more than 60 million mobile subscribers by the end of 2004. Over 36 million subscribers use “payas-you-go”<br />

mobiles; this has helped the emergence of the “virtual” operators, such as Virg<strong>in</strong>, who have over 5<br />

million subscribers. UK mobile retail revenues were up 14% year-on-year largely as a result of volume growth.<br />

Vodafone, Orange and T-Mobile have all launched 3G services <strong>in</strong> 2004. Wireless hotspots are widely available<br />

<strong>in</strong> U.K. There are more than 9,500 WiFi “hotspots” <strong>in</strong> several locations throughout the UK, with an estimated<br />

1,200 provide services <strong>in</strong> London, more than any other city <strong>in</strong> the world.<br />

Broadband take-up has cont<strong>in</strong>ued to grow, helped by the <strong>in</strong>troduction of new services, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g higher speed<br />

services, and a number of price cuts. DSL broadband is now available to over 90% of the UK, with 100%<br />

coverage planned by 2005 (see annex). Provisional estimates suggest the number of broadband connections<br />

passed six million at the end of 2004; there are now more broadband connections than un-metered dial-up<br />

Broadband users are more than twice as likely to download music and videos as dial-up users.<br />

The major telecommunications companies are BT, COLT, Easynet, Energis Equ<strong>in</strong>ox, K<strong>in</strong>gston<br />

Communications, Logicalis, MLL Telecom, Neos Networks, Networks by wireless, NTL.<br />

A number of <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g developments have taken place <strong>in</strong> 2004:<br />

• BT Wholesale announced it had reached 4 million DSL subscribers, with around 60,000 new<br />

connections a week.<br />

• Easynet’s consumer arm, UK Onl<strong>in</strong>e, now offers an 8Mbit/s service for £39.99 a month at 230 BT<br />

exchanges <strong>in</strong> 2005. The company is offer<strong>in</strong>g higher speed wholesale services to other ISPs.<br />

• Telewest has completed its network upgrade and is now offer<strong>in</strong>g services up to 4Mbit/s for £50 per<br />

month.<br />

• NTL announced <strong>in</strong> November that it had completed the acquisition of Virg<strong>in</strong> Media Group’s rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong> Net giv<strong>in</strong>g it 100% ownership of the ISP which it claimed has around 600,000<br />

customers.<br />

• Bulldog has launched a bundled voice and broadband service offer<strong>in</strong>g a 4Mbit/s broadband and voice<br />

service from £40 a month.<br />

• Other service launches <strong>in</strong>clude a 1Mbit/s capped service (2GB limit) from Tiscali for £15.99 a month, a<br />

2Mbit/s capped service (1GB limit) from Eclipse for £14.99 a month and a 2Mbit/s capped service<br />

(1GB) from Nildram for £17.99.<br />

• Waitrose has reduced the cost of its broadband services to £18.99 per month for 256Kbps, £23.99 for<br />

512Kbps and £29.99 per month for 1Mbps.<br />

In mid November 2004, Vodafone announced the full launch of its 3G services. The company claims that its<br />

network can serve 60% of the UK population with seamless handover to 3G from its 2G network where<br />

necessary. Orange followed Vodafone <strong>in</strong>to the UK 3G arena a couple of weeks later claim<strong>in</strong>g 70% population<br />

coverage of the UK, aga<strong>in</strong> with seamless 2G/3G handover. “3” UK announced that it had hit the regulatory<br />

requirement of 80% population coverage.


Page 233 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

T-Mobile cont<strong>in</strong>ued to adopt a low-key approach to consumer 3G. The company also entered <strong>in</strong>to an agreement<br />

with TDC, a Danish telecoms company, to provide wholesale access to the T-Mobile network for a voice and<br />

SMS mobile service us<strong>in</strong>g the “easy” brand name from the easyGroup. 02 is reported to be aim<strong>in</strong>g for a 3G<br />

launch <strong>in</strong> the early part of 2005. In preparation the company entered <strong>in</strong>to an agreement with NTT DoCoMo to<br />

use its i-mode based services across the UK.<br />

Tesco announced that it had passed the half million subscriber mark for its mobile service at the end of 2004<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce it launched <strong>in</strong> late 2003. BT announced the launch of BT Mobile as a “virtual network provider” with its<br />

customer’s calls be<strong>in</strong>g carried over Vodafone’s network.<br />

Providers and Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The year 2004 was a significant one for the UK telecoms <strong>in</strong>dustry with the launch of consumer 3G services from<br />

both Vodafone and Orange. Despite reach<strong>in</strong>g close to saturation levels there cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be growth <strong>in</strong> the<br />

reported number of mobile subscribers. Average use and revenue per subscriber rema<strong>in</strong>s flat however. There<br />

seems to be little downward pressure on consumer prices. Prices for fixed voice services, however, cont<strong>in</strong>ue to<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>e helped by <strong>in</strong>creased competition aris<strong>in</strong>g from carrier-pre-selection services. Prices for residential fixed<br />

voice telecoms fell by around 7% <strong>in</strong> the year. BT’s market share fell to 55% of calls <strong>in</strong> the quarter to September.<br />

At least 30% of l<strong>in</strong>es now take services from a provider other than BT.<br />

The UK broadband market cont<strong>in</strong>ues to grow apace. The total number of broadband connections have passed<br />

the 6 million mark <strong>in</strong> 2004 (see annex). This means that broadband now accounts for 38% of all <strong>in</strong>ternet<br />

connections. Competition <strong>in</strong> the broadband arena rema<strong>in</strong>s strong and there is a clear trend among ISPs to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease the basic speeds available to consumers (see annex). Services are now available <strong>in</strong> some areas at speeds<br />

of up to 8 MB/s. Demand for such speeds seems certa<strong>in</strong> to <strong>in</strong>crease if recent patterns of broadband use are a<br />

guide. Latest research shows download<strong>in</strong>g music and video and play<strong>in</strong>g games is very popular among<br />

broadband users.<br />

8.27.3 Broadband policy<br />

Oftel is currently the regulator for the UK telecommunications <strong>in</strong>dustry. Ofcom will be the UK’s new<br />

communications <strong>in</strong>dustry regulator with wide-rang<strong>in</strong>g responsibilities across the UK’s communications markets.<br />

The Government recognises that the Internet has enormous potential for education, enterta<strong>in</strong>ment and bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

and wants everybody to be able to have access to it and to use it confidently.<br />

Regional authorities (Adit) have been put <strong>in</strong> place to provide efficient public services. The Adits, with their<br />

regional focus, are work<strong>in</strong>g to provide and procure solutions based on maximis<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

A Community of Interest Network (COIN) consists of one or more computers or organisations provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

services to people to ga<strong>in</strong> access to those services and to each other. While many of these networks tie together<br />

geographically, separated <strong>in</strong>dividuals l<strong>in</strong>ked by a common <strong>in</strong>terest or profession i.e. care workers, GPs, doctors<br />

and health bodies or other models such as the Peoples Network (libraries) exist and have been set up to offer<br />

shared <strong>in</strong>formation services with<strong>in</strong> the wider community. The <strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> such networks, as well<br />

as the relationships between the participants, make up an ‘electronic greenbelt’ to re<strong>in</strong>force and add value to the<br />

community. These communities do <strong>in</strong>clude a variety of other <strong>in</strong>terest groups whose needs and <strong>in</strong>terests<br />

transcend the geographic boundaries of the town, region or country.<br />

COINs <strong>in</strong> the Health sector provide <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g connectivity between a number of different health organisations<br />

such as acute, mental health, care services, ambulance to name a few. The requirement to <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>k connectivity<br />

is borne out of the need to share common data sets to ensure cont<strong>in</strong>uity and standardisation across a given area<br />

or region. COINs are now be<strong>in</strong>g seen <strong>in</strong> a wider context and that there is a real need to <strong>in</strong>clude other agencies<br />

outside of the typical health sphere. Social Services, hous<strong>in</strong>g groups, welfare and charities as well as other Local<br />

Government departments are see<strong>in</strong>g the need to share <strong>in</strong>formation with the health sector. This becomes more<br />

apparent as you chart the patient cycle from start to f<strong>in</strong>ish or <strong>in</strong> some cases from start to cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g support.<br />

The wider spectrum of support provides a common l<strong>in</strong>k for all agencies and bodies to <strong>in</strong>teract and share vital<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation. This concept works towards the aim of a Public Sector shared network enabl<strong>in</strong>g shared services and<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation across a wide range of agencies. This requirement provides the Adits with the larger task of<br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g where these COINs are and how many organisations are <strong>in</strong>volved.<br />

8.27.4 Conclusion<br />

UK is one of the lead<strong>in</strong>g European country with a growth rate of broadband penetration. Thanks to multiple<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives from the Government and community <strong>in</strong>itiatives, and associated competition <strong>in</strong> the health economy,<br />

the growth of broadband <strong>in</strong> fixed, mobile and wireless is shap<strong>in</strong>g to reach the UK’s broadband strategy work<strong>in</strong>g.


8.27.5 Appendix<br />

DSL map<br />

ISP<br />

Price / Month<br />

(<strong>in</strong>c VAT)<br />

Cable map<br />

Figure 72: Broadband map of U.K<br />

Download<br />

Speed<br />

Download<br />

limit<br />

Seriously 2Mbps £14.99 1Mbps 1 Gb<br />

Telewest Blueyonder<br />

265K (cable)<br />

£14.99 256Kbps No limit<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong> Broadband-3 P £15.99 512Kbps 1 Gb<br />

Page 234 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Extras<br />

anti-virus, spam control, 200 Mb webspace, 1 free<br />

.co.uk doma<strong>in</strong> name, static ip address, 24 hour<br />

national rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

30 Mb webspace, 5 email accounts, 24 hour local<br />

rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

5 email addresses, email anti-virus and spam<br />

protection, 10 Mb webspace


Tiscali Broadband x10 £15.99 512Kbps 30 Gb<br />

Tiscali Broadband x20 £15.99 1Mbps 2 Gb<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong> Broadband Plan 2 £17.99 512Kbps<br />

NTL 1Mb (cable) £17.99 1Mbps 3 GB<br />

BT Broadband Basic £17.99 1Mbps<br />

1 GB, add. fees<br />

apply if data<br />

transfer exceeds<br />

limit<br />

Tiscali Bus<strong>in</strong>ess 250 £18.79 256Kbps No limit<br />

Boltblue Silver £18.99 512Kbps<br />

limited to 150<br />

hours<br />

Tiscali Broadband x40 £19.99 2Mbps 15 Gb<br />

Tiscali Bus<strong>in</strong>ess 500 £23.4 512Kbps No limit<br />

One.Tel Unplugged<br />

500U<br />

Page 235 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

6 email addresses, 100 mb webspace, national rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e, anti-spam and anti-virus<br />

6 email addresses, 100 mb webspace, national rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e, anti-spam and anti-virus<br />

55 Mb webspace, 15 email accounts, 24 hour local<br />

rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e, no reconnection charge for mov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

house<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e 50p per m<strong>in</strong>ute; not Mac compatible<br />

anti-virus, anti-spam, 20 email addresses, 1GB mail<br />

storage, 100Mb webspace, free doma<strong>in</strong> name, static<br />

IP address, 30% off Norton Internet Security<br />

5 email accounts, 15 Mb webspace<br />

6 email addresses, 100 mb webspace, national rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e, anti-spam and anti-virus<br />

anti-virus, anti-spam, 20 email addresses, 1GB mail<br />

storage, 100Mb webspace, free doma<strong>in</strong> name, static<br />

IP address, 30% off Norton Internet Security<br />

£23.99 512Kbps No limit 1 email account, national rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

BT Broadband £24.99 2Mbps 15 Gb 24 hour local rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

NTL 2Mb (cable)<br />

£24.99 (first<br />

month free)<br />

2Mbps No limit<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong> Broadband Plan 1 £24.99 512Kbps 20 GB<br />

55 Mb webspace, 15 email accounts, 24 hour local<br />

rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e, no reconnection charge for mov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

house<br />

5 email addresses, email anti-virus and spam<br />

protection, 10 Mb webspace


UK Onl<strong>in</strong>e Broadband<br />

500<br />

£24.99 512Kbps No limit<br />

Page 236 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

100 Mb email spam protection, 24/4 local rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Boltblue Silver Plus £24.99 512Kbps No limit 5 email accounts, 15 Mb webspace, static IP address<br />

Boltblue Gold £24.99 1Mbps / 150 hours 5 email accounts, 15 Mb webspace, static IP address<br />

Telewest Blueyonder<br />

1Mb (cable)<br />

BT Yahoo! Broadband<br />

Homechoice 1Mbps<br />

(bundled with free<br />

even<strong>in</strong>g & weekend<br />

calls)<br />

Seriously 2Mbps<br />

unlimited<br />

yUK Onl<strong>in</strong>e Broadband<br />

2000<br />

£25.00 1Mbps No limit<br />

£26.99 2Mbps 15 Gb<br />

£27.50 1Mbps No limits<br />

£27.99 2Mbps No limit<br />

£29.99 2Mbps No limit<br />

30 Mb webspace, 5 email accounts, 24 hour local<br />

rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

11 email accounts, LAUNCHcast personal music<br />

station, 15 Mb webspace, 100Mb onl<strong>in</strong>e file storage,<br />

anti-virus and spam protection, pop-up ad blocker,<br />

parental controls, local rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

free even<strong>in</strong>g & weekend calls, digital tv & radio<br />

<strong>in</strong>cl. on-demand channels, anti-spam/virus, 100mb<br />

webspace, 12 email addresses, local rate support l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

8am-11pm 7 days a week, *Homechoice is only<br />

available <strong>in</strong> London and surround<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

anti-virus, spam control, 200 Mb webspace, 1 free<br />

.co.uk doma<strong>in</strong> name, static ip address, 24 hour<br />

national rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

100 Mb email spam protection, 24/4 local rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Boltblue Gold Plus £29.99 1Mbps No limit 5 email accounts, 15 Mb webspace, static IP address<br />

One.Tel Unlimitted UK<br />

Calls +Broadband<br />

Homechoice 2Mbps<br />

(bundle with free even<strong>in</strong>g<br />

& weekend calls)<br />

Telewest Blueyonder<br />

2Mb (cable)<br />

£29.99 512Kbps No limit<br />

£32.00 2Mbps No limit<br />

£35.00 2Mbps No limit<br />

Tiscali Bus<strong>in</strong>ess 1000 £35.24 1 Mbps No limit<br />

1 email account, national rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e , unlimitted<br />

UK landl<strong>in</strong>e calls<br />

free even<strong>in</strong>g & weekend calls, digital tv & radio<br />

<strong>in</strong>cl. on-demand channels, anti-spam/virus, 100mb<br />

webspace, 12 email addresses, local rate support l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

8am-11pm 7 days a week, *Homechoice is only<br />

available <strong>in</strong> London and surround<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

30 Mb webspace, 5 email accounts, 24 hour local<br />

rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

anti-virus, anti-spam, 20 email addresses, 1GB mail<br />

storage, 100Mb webspace, free doma<strong>in</strong> name, static<br />

IP address, 30% off Norton Internet Security


BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess S<strong>in</strong>gle 500 £35.24 512Kbps No limit<br />

Homechoice 1Mbps<br />

(bundled with free UK<br />

calls)<br />

£36.50 1Mbps No limit<br />

NTL 3Mb (cable) £37.99 3Mbps 1 Gb/day<br />

UK Onl<strong>in</strong>e Broadband<br />

8000<br />

£39.99 8 Mbps 500 Gb<br />

One.Tel Unplugged 500 £39.99 512Kbps No limit<br />

One.Tel Unlimited UK<br />

Calls + Mobile +<br />

Broadband Bundle<br />

Homechoice 2Mbps<br />

(bundled with free UK<br />

calls)<br />

Homechoice 4Mbps<br />

(bundled with free<br />

weekend & even<strong>in</strong>g<br />

calls)<br />

One.Tel Unlimited UK<br />

Calls + Mobile +<br />

Broadband Bundle<br />

Homechoice 4Mbps<br />

(bundled with free UK<br />

calls)<br />

Telewest Blueyonder<br />

4Mb (cable)<br />

£39.99 512Kbps No limit<br />

£42.00 2Mbps No limit<br />

£45.00 4Mbps No limit<br />

£49.99 512Kbps No limit<br />

£50.00 4Mbps No limit<br />

£50.00 4Mbps No limit<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess S<strong>in</strong>gle 1000 £52.88 1 Mbps No limit<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Share 500 £52.88 512Kbps No limit<br />

Page 237 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

for one computer, 24 hour local rate tech support<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e, 10 mailboxes capacity 100mb, spam and<br />

email virus protection, 20mb web space (can use<br />

your own doma<strong>in</strong> name), static IP address from £10<br />

per month<br />

free UK calls, digital tv & radio <strong>in</strong>cl. on-demand<br />

channels, anti-spam, anti-virus, 100mb webspace, 12<br />

email addresses, local rate support l<strong>in</strong>e 8am-11pm 7<br />

days a week, *Homechoice is only available <strong>in</strong><br />

London and surround<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

55 Mb webspace, 15 email accounts, 24 hour local<br />

rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e, no reconnection charge for mov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

house<br />

upload speeds up to 400 Kbps (rather than the usual<br />

256 Kbps), contention ratio 33:1 (rather than 50:1)<br />

1 email account, static IP address, national rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e, lower contention ratio<br />

1 email account, national rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e , unlimited<br />

UK landl<strong>in</strong>e calls, free mobile with 60 <strong>in</strong>clusive<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes<br />

free UK calls, digital tv & radio <strong>in</strong>cl. on-demand<br />

channels, anti-spam, anti-virus, 100mb webspace, 12<br />

email addresses, local rate support l<strong>in</strong>e 8am-11pm 7<br />

days a week, *Homechoice is only available <strong>in</strong><br />

London and surround<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

free even<strong>in</strong>g & weekend calls, digital tv & radio<br />

<strong>in</strong>cl. on-demand channels, anti-spam/virus, 100mb<br />

webspace, 12 email addresses, local rate support l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

8am-11pm 7 days a week, *Homechoice is only<br />

available <strong>in</strong> London and surround<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

1 email account, national rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e , unlimited<br />

UK landl<strong>in</strong>e calls, free mobile with 120 <strong>in</strong>clusive<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes and 50 texts<br />

free UK calls, digital tv & radio <strong>in</strong>cl. on-demand<br />

channels, anti-spam, anti-virus, 100mb webspace, 12<br />

email addresses, local rate support l<strong>in</strong>e 8am-11pm 7<br />

days a week, *Homechoice is only available <strong>in</strong><br />

London and surround<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

30 Mb webspace, 5 email accounts, 24 hour local<br />

rate helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

for one computer, 24 hour local rate tech support<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e, 10 mailboxes capacity 100mb, spam and<br />

email virus protection, 20mb web space, static IP<br />

address from £10 per month<br />

for up to 4 computers, 24 hour local rate tech<br />

support helpl<strong>in</strong>e, 10 mailboxes capacity 100mb,<br />

spam and email virus protection, 20mb web space,<br />

static IP address from £10 per month


One.Tel Unplugged 1000 £59.99 1Mbps No limit<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Network<br />

1000<br />

£76.38 1Mbps No limit<br />

One.Tel Unplugged 2000 £79.99 2Mbps No limit<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Network<br />

2000<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Broadband<br />

Advanced SDSL<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Broadband<br />

Advanced SDSL<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Broadband<br />

Advanced SDSL<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Broadband<br />

Advanced SDSL<br />

BT Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Broadband<br />

Advanced SDSL<br />

£117.50 2Mbps No limit<br />

£199.75<br />

512Kbps No<br />

limit<br />

£270.25 1Mbps No limit<br />

£405.38 2Mbps No limit<br />

£270.25 1Mbps No limit<br />

£405.38 2Mbps No limit<br />

Table 43: Broadband pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> UK<br />

% of total exchange l<strong>in</strong>es Total exchange l<strong>in</strong>es (m)<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

35.2<br />

34.5<br />

34.4<br />

Page 238 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

1 email account, static IP address, national rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

for up to 10 computers, specialist network helpdesk,<br />

service level agreement, 10 mailboxes capacity<br />

100mb, spam and email virus protection, 20mb web<br />

space, static IP address from £10 per month<br />

1 email account, static IP address, national rate<br />

helpl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

for up to 20 computers, specialist network helpdesk,<br />

service level agreement, 10 mailboxes capacity<br />

100mb, spam and email virus protection, 20mb web<br />

space, static IP address from £10 per month<br />

symmetric DSL broadband service for bus<strong>in</strong>esses<br />

with high data or bandwidth requirements, 10 email<br />

addresses. 20 Mb webspace. Static IP addess.<br />

Service Level Agreement. BT eng<strong>in</strong>eer <strong>in</strong>stalled.<br />

34.0<br />

0.3%<br />

0.4%<br />

1.2%<br />

1.7%<br />

4.1%<br />

3.6% 5.3%<br />

12.3%<br />

2001<br />

Q3<br />

Q4 2002<br />

Q1<br />

12.7% 13.0% 13.1%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 2003<br />

Q1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 2004<br />

Q1<br />

Q2 Q3<br />

40<br />

10.2% 32<br />

Figure 73: Fixed telecom l<strong>in</strong>es: Broadband l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>crease compared to ISDN<br />

24<br />

16<br />

8<br />

0<br />

DSL<br />

Cable modem<br />

ISDN channels<br />

Total exchange l<strong>in</strong>es (RHS)


15<br />

12<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

0<br />

2001<br />

Q3<br />

Q4 2002<br />

Q1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 2003<br />

Q1<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 2004<br />

Q1<br />

Page 239 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 *<br />

Figure 74: UK Internet connections compared to Dial-up (<strong>in</strong> million l<strong>in</strong>es) 2004<br />

UK broadband connections<br />

000s<br />

Dec 03 Mar 04 Jun 04 Sep 04<br />

BT retail 829 967 1,102 1,283<br />

BT wholesale 924 1,248 1,585 2,011<br />

Other DSL: LLU & K<strong>in</strong>gston 18 21 29 38<br />

ntl 951 1,030 1,097 1,174<br />

Telewest BB 415 465 528 607<br />

Other: Satellite & FWA 9 9 9 9<br />

Total 3,146 3,740 4,350 5,122<br />

Source: Ofcom / operators<br />

Figure 75: UK Broadband connections<br />

Percentage of UK adults with a PC/<strong>in</strong>ternet <strong>in</strong> the home<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

52%<br />

45%<br />

Q4 2002<br />

Q1<br />

53%<br />

42%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 2003<br />

Q1<br />

59%<br />

50%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4 2004<br />

Q1<br />

65%<br />

57%<br />

Q2 Q3 Q4<br />

Figure 76: Household PC and Internet penetration<br />

Dial-up<br />

Broadband<br />

L<strong>in</strong>e 4<br />

PC<br />

Internet


8.28 Non-EU country studies: United States<br />

8.28.1 Introduction<br />

Page 240 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

OECD reports that <strong>in</strong> 2001 the US had 285 million <strong>in</strong>habitants. 499 Because of its huge size, population per square<br />

meter is only 30 – well below the OECD average of 150. The rural population accounts for 22.6%, which<br />

corresponds to the OECD average. The US has the highest GDP figures from OECD countries. In 2002, it was<br />

36 100 US$ per capita.<br />

This case study focuses, <strong>in</strong> the US context, on factors affect<strong>in</strong>g primarily the demand side (e.g. lifestyle,<br />

education, and <strong>in</strong>come) as well as factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the supply side (e.g. pric<strong>in</strong>g, demographics) are exam<strong>in</strong>ed. In<br />

addition, it gives an overview over federal and state measures to <strong>in</strong>crease BB uptake. Currently, these measures<br />

primarily aim at <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the supply with <strong>in</strong>frastructure while stimulat<strong>in</strong>g demand is only tackled secondarily.<br />

Yet, there is a huge gap between availability of BB <strong>in</strong>frastructure supply and uptake by end users.<br />

As for sources, general statistical data has been taken from the OECD <strong>in</strong> order to allow for <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

comparisons. The report on BB access <strong>in</strong> rural and remote areas of May 2004 and the benchmark<strong>in</strong>g BB prices<br />

report of June 2004 provided empirical data. In addition, recent reports produced by the Pew Internet &<br />

American Life <strong>Project</strong> and the US Department of Commerce were exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Section two draws heavily on the<br />

2004 report by the Alliance for Public Technology and categorises state measures <strong>in</strong>to six types. A<br />

comprehensive overview (from 2002) over state measures was also exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this context. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the Annex<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s useful l<strong>in</strong>ks.<br />

8.28.2 The broadband market<br />

A dist<strong>in</strong>ction needs to be made between penetration and uptake rates. While the former focuses on the network,<br />

the latter focuses on the end user. The purpose of this difference between supply of <strong>in</strong>frastructure and demand<br />

for BB services is to underl<strong>in</strong>e the importance of measures targeted at stimulat<strong>in</strong>g demand (end user) are<br />

necessary if a high BB uptake rate is the goal (and only this must be the real goal).<br />

As for penetration rates, at the end of 2003, 75% of all telecom copper l<strong>in</strong>es had been upgraded to provide DSL<br />

BB services. S<strong>in</strong>ce most households have a copper l<strong>in</strong>e roughly 75% of all households could have DSL BB. 500<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the OECD, BB over cable is available to 80% of all households (roughly 85 million). 501 Because<br />

DSL is distant-dependent and therefore availability to end users difficult to measure, we’ll use cable access to<br />

illustrate the difference between uptake and penetration rates: cable BB is available to 85 million households yet<br />

only 12.6 million have signed up for BB. 502 Even if one adds the 9.3 million households which have BB access<br />

via compet<strong>in</strong>g DSL services, it becomes clear that there is a huge gap between supply of <strong>in</strong>frastructure and<br />

uptake of services. Hence, measures focus<strong>in</strong>g primarily on the supply side will perhaps have a positive <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

on pric<strong>in</strong>g 503 , but additional measures focus<strong>in</strong>g on the end user are needed if one wants to <strong>in</strong>crease – the more<br />

decisive – uptake rate. 504<br />

The US Department of Commerce reports that 19.9% of all households subscribe to BB access <strong>in</strong> October<br />

2003. 505 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the PEW Internet& American Life <strong>Project</strong>, <strong>in</strong> February 2004 24% of all adult Americans<br />

(roughly 48 million) had Internet access at home and 34% had access either at work or home. 506 Compared with<br />

March 2003, this translates <strong>in</strong>to an annual growth rate of 60%. Figure 77 illustrates the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> BB access at<br />

home 507 .<br />

499 The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas, OECD (May 2004), p. 71.<br />

500 The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas, OECD (May 2004), p. 12. However, measur<strong>in</strong>g availability of DSL<br />

is difficult because DSL technology is distant-dependent. Even though local exchanges might have been upgraded, for peope liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

further away than 6 km there is no DSL available. Hence, measure<strong>in</strong>g availability only <strong>in</strong> terms of upgraded local exchanges gives an<br />

<strong>in</strong>complete picture. In this respect, see also OECD (May 2004), p. 47.<br />

501 The OECD reports that 95% of all households are passed by cable networks and 80% are passed by upgraded cable networks. The<br />

Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas, OECD (May 2004), p. 13; Pages 46-52 conta<strong>in</strong> some useful <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

on BB <strong>in</strong> rural areas <strong>in</strong> the US.<br />

502 A Nation Onl<strong>in</strong>e: Enter<strong>in</strong>g the Broadband Age (September 2004), p. 5.<br />

503 Too high pric<strong>in</strong>g is cited by 38.9% of the Americans as the ma<strong>in</strong> reason why they dont use BB Internet from home.<br />

504 Of course, another key driver is the market-driven development of new services which also positively affects the uptake rate.<br />

505 A Nation Onl<strong>in</strong>e: Enter<strong>in</strong>g the Broadband Age (September 2004), p. 1.<br />

506 Pew Internet <strong>Project</strong> Data Memo (2004), p. 1.<br />

507 Pew Internet <strong>Project</strong> Data Memo (2004), p. 10.


Figure 77: Broadband At Home<br />

Page 241 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Graph 2 shows the regional differences <strong>in</strong> terms of Internet usage <strong>in</strong> the US and has been taken from the<br />

Department of Commerce report. There is a strong relation between education and <strong>in</strong>come distribution level –<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g which cannot be offset by merely <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g more and cheaper routers and switches. 508<br />

Figure 78: Distribution of Internet Use across the States, 2001 and 2003<br />

(Internet Use by State Population, Ages 3 and Over) 509<br />

Generally, richer regions where better educated people live have a higher uptake rate than poorer regions where<br />

less educated people live. It is important to keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that graph 2 does not make a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between dialup<br />

and BB access and the quality of the network. Network capacity, <strong>in</strong> turn, is generally higher <strong>in</strong> richer areas. 510<br />

508 Internet Use by Regions <strong>in</strong> the US, PEW (August 2003). Available at:<br />

http://www.pew<strong>in</strong>ternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Regional_Report_Aug_2003.pdf (last visited 14.12. 2004)<br />

509 Because states can have very different confidence <strong>in</strong>tervals, states were assigned to a category based on whether the upper confidence<br />

bound <strong>in</strong>cludes the break po<strong>in</strong>t. For example, a state with a po<strong>in</strong>t estimate of 59.0 percent would be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the 60 percent to 70<br />

percent range because the confidence range of the estimate is 57.2 percent to 62.0 percent.


Page 242 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Mississippi is the State with the lowest BB uptake rate with an estimated Internet population between 39.7% and<br />

45.5%. It was only <strong>in</strong> July 2003 511 that a tax <strong>in</strong>centive program was <strong>in</strong>troduced aimed at <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong><br />

BB <strong>in</strong>frastructure and services. 512 The countries with the highest penetration rates are Alaska (69.3% - 73.8%),<br />

New Hampshire (68.2% - 72.6%), Utah (67.2% – 71.9%), M<strong>in</strong>nesota (66.8% - 71.1%), Wyom<strong>in</strong>g (66% -<br />

70.8%) and Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State (65.7% - 70.3%). From States with a population of more than 3 million,<br />

M<strong>in</strong>nesota is the State with the highest Internet population. Alaska has demographics similar to Canada where a<br />

large part of the population is liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a concentrated area which is easier to connect (though it is remote).<br />

Hence, the chapter on policy measures two <strong>in</strong>vestigates some of the measures undertaken <strong>in</strong> the lead<strong>in</strong>g states<br />

and one, new public-private <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> more detail. 513<br />

As for metropolitan areas and Broadband Internet access, <strong>in</strong> Q4 of 2003, the top 10 local BB markets where San<br />

Diego, CA (52%), Boston, MA (50%), New York (49%) NY, Providence, RI (47%), Kansas City, KA (46%),<br />

Detroit, MI (45%), Tampa, FL (45%), Orlando, FL (44%), San Francisco, CA (44%) and Los Angeles, CA<br />

(44%). As for metropolitan areas and dial-up Internet access, the top 10 narrowband markets are Albuquerque-<br />

Santa Fe, NM (76%), Grand Rapids, MI (70%), Harrisburg, PA (70%), Indianapolis, IN (70%), Sacramento-<br />

Stockton, CA (69%), Birm<strong>in</strong>gham, AL (68%), Nashville, TN (67%), Loisville, KY (67%), Memphis, TN (66%),<br />

and St. Louis, MO (66%). 514<br />

8.28.2.1 Demand<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g factors affect<strong>in</strong>g demand, this case study focuses on <strong>in</strong>come and <strong>in</strong>come distribution, PC penetration,<br />

lifestyle and education. Generally, the higher the <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>come, the higher the PC penetration, the more<br />

technology-prone and the higher the level of education, the more likely it is that users subscribe to BB services.<br />

Figure 79 515 shows the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons why Americans don’t use the Internet at home. The two ma<strong>in</strong> reasons are<br />

lack of <strong>in</strong>terest/need and pric<strong>in</strong>g. Equally importantly, only 9.8% cite lack of <strong>in</strong>frastructure as the ma<strong>in</strong> reason<br />

why they don’t use BB at home.<br />

Figure 79: Ma<strong>in</strong> reasons why Americans don’t use the Internet at home<br />

Income is another factors which affects BB penetration rates. Generally, the higher the <strong>in</strong>come, the higher the<br />

BB penetration rate. One can dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the <strong>in</strong>come of the state (measured <strong>in</strong> GDP) and the <strong>in</strong>come of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dividual (<strong>in</strong>come per household). Despite the highest per capita <strong>in</strong>come of the OECD, the US is only<br />

ranked 10 th <strong>in</strong> terms of BB penetration rates. When it comes to BB penetration rates what also matters<br />

510<br />

In Western and Northeastern Region roughly 23% of all Internet connected households are equipped with BB while this number is only<br />

17% <strong>in</strong> the Midwest and South.<br />

511<br />

In 2002, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the TIA, there was no BB <strong>in</strong>itiative by Mississippi.<br />

512<br />

A Nation of Laboratories: Broadband Policy Experiments <strong>in</strong> the States (March 2004); available at http://www.apt.org/publica/ (last<br />

visited: 18. Nov 2004); p. 24.<br />

513<br />

http://mcknight.org/about/news_detail.aspx?itemID=1414&catID=53&typeID=2<br />

514<br />

http://www.<strong>in</strong>ternetworldstats.com/articles/art047.htm (last visted 18. Nov 2004).<br />

515<br />

A Nation Onl<strong>in</strong>e: Enter<strong>in</strong>g the Broadband Age (September 2004), p. s14.


Page 243 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

considerably is the <strong>in</strong>come distribution. In particular, the absolute number of people hav<strong>in</strong>g low <strong>in</strong>come is<br />

relevant.<br />

Figure 80: Broadband <strong>in</strong> the Home<br />

Unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, the higher the household <strong>in</strong>come, the more likely it is to have a BB connection at home. A PEW<br />

survey shows that 47% of households with more than 75 000 US$ <strong>in</strong>come have a BB connection at home –<br />

while the overall BB penetration rate is only 24%. 516 As for the importance of education, Figure 80 shows that<br />

40% of college graduates have BB at home while only 24% of all Americans have BB access at home. This<br />

considerable gap shows the importance of education to teach people how to make use of the Internet and<br />

computers. F<strong>in</strong>ally, accord<strong>in</strong>g to PEW, 69% of all American households had a PC <strong>in</strong> 2002 and 59% had access<br />

to the Internet. 517 As almost all PC households have Internet access, there is a strong relation between the PC and<br />

BB penetration rate.<br />

8.28.2.2 Users<br />

Lifestyle and education are two important factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the demand for BB services and BB penetration<br />

rates. The more technology <strong>in</strong>terested and open towards new th<strong>in</strong>gs people are the more they are likely to<br />

subscribe to BB services. PEW conducted a study <strong>in</strong> 2003 and dist<strong>in</strong>guishes between two <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

technology user groups separat<strong>in</strong>g those two <strong>in</strong>to four sub-categories each. As for user groups, PEW makes a<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between Trendsett<strong>in</strong>g Tech Elites and Lower Tech Groups. 518<br />

The Trendsett<strong>in</strong>g Tech Elite make up for 31% of the American population and constist of young tech elites<br />

(6%), older wired baby boomers (6%), wired generation Xers (18%) and wired senior men (1%). The Young<br />

Tech Elite are on average 22 years old and pre-dom<strong>in</strong>antly male with a good education (32% have at least a<br />

college degree). In addition, this group has an <strong>in</strong>come which is slightly above national average. 47% of the tech<br />

elite primarily lives <strong>in</strong> urban areas and is creative (34% practise some k<strong>in</strong>d of art). This group tends to spend<br />

$161 on communication services (Internet, phone, cable TV) compared to a national average of $122.<br />

The Wired Older Baby Boomers are on average 52 years old and live <strong>in</strong> sub-urban or urban areas. Their<br />

annual <strong>in</strong>come exceeds $75 000 (roughly three times the national average). This group is highly educated with<br />

56% hav<strong>in</strong>g at least a college degree (compared to 25% of all Americans). On average, this category spends<br />

$175 for communication services. The Wired Generation Xers is the biggest category of the trendsett<strong>in</strong>g tech<br />

elite, which makes up roughly 18% of all Americans. This group is on average 36 years old and equally split<br />

between men and women. The group is pre-dom<strong>in</strong>antly white (85%) and are likely to live <strong>in</strong> suburbs. On<br />

average, this category spends $169 for communication services.<br />

516 Pew Internet <strong>Project</strong> Data Memo (2004), p. 4.<br />

517 PEW Consumption of Information Goods ans Services <strong>in</strong> the US (Nov 2003), p. 5.<br />

518 For details on the user groups and sub-categories see PEW (Nov 2003), p. 6-13.


Page 244 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The Lower Tech Groups make up roughly two thirds of the total American population, PEW dist<strong>in</strong>guished<br />

between young marrieds (15%), low-tech Older Baby Boomers (21%), unwired young Baby Boomers (16%)<br />

and low-tech elderly (16%). The Young Marrieds are roughly the same age as the young tech elites (24 years).<br />

While age is roughly the same, leve of education and <strong>in</strong>come dist<strong>in</strong>cts them from young tech elites. Only 12% of<br />

young marrieds have a college degree (compared to the 34% for young tech elites) and their average monthly<br />

<strong>in</strong>come is less than $ 20 000. Unlike the young tech elite, young marrieds are racially diverse with 22% Lat<strong>in</strong>os<br />

(10% of the young tech elites) and 16% Afro-American (13% of the young tech elites). On average, young<br />

marrieds spend $122 on communication services (as compared to $161 <strong>in</strong> the case of young tech elites). The<br />

Low-Tech Baby Boomers corresponds to the Wired Older Baby Boomers category and is on average 54 years<br />

old. They are mostly women (56%). Only 22% have a college degree (compared to 56% <strong>in</strong> the case of wired<br />

older baby boomers). Moreover, only 23% have more than $75 000 <strong>in</strong>come (compared to 60% of the<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g tech elite group). 26% of this group primarily lives <strong>in</strong> rural areas (compared to 15% of the older<br />

baby boomers). Low tech baby boomers spend considerably less on commuication services ($ 124 – compared<br />

to $ 175).<br />

The Unwired Young Baby Boomers have an average age of 39 years and are racially diverse (14% are Black<br />

and 13% Hispanic) compared to the correspond<strong>in</strong>g tech elite category Wired GenXers (7% and 10%<br />

respectively). Only 15% have a college degree and they have a lower than national <strong>in</strong>come. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the Low<br />

Tech Elderly is on average 73 years old and are primarily women. Only 12% have Internet access. Their annual<br />

<strong>in</strong>come is also very low (80% live <strong>in</strong> households with less than $20 000 annual <strong>in</strong>come). This group also spends<br />

very little on communication services ($82).<br />

Unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, two features that dist<strong>in</strong>guishes the trendsett<strong>in</strong>g tech elite from lower tech groups are the high<br />

level of education and an – above average – <strong>in</strong>come level. Age plays an important role <strong>in</strong>sofar as it represents a<br />

rather big portion of the society (17%) and that this group is less likely to make use of Internet services. 519<br />

8.28.2.3 Supply<br />

With respect to BB penetration and uptake rates, technology is important for two reasons. 520 First, different<br />

access technologies and <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition result <strong>in</strong> lower prices for the end user. Second, network<br />

capacity and transmission speed is an important factor which makes people switch to BB from dial-up because it<br />

allows for new services to be delivered. Pric<strong>in</strong>g and new services, <strong>in</strong> turn, are key factors affect<strong>in</strong>g BB uptake<br />

and penetration rates. 521<br />

As for access technologies <strong>in</strong> homes, cable is still <strong>in</strong> the lead (54%), but DSL accounts for already 42%. In 2003,<br />

67% had access via cable modems and only 28% via DSL. In percentage terms, wireless or fixed-satellite access<br />

accounts for 3%. In March 2003 this number was higher and stood at 4%. 522 FTTH as the most advanced<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> terms of capacity and transmission speeds is not widely deployed <strong>in</strong> the US. 523 The OECD report<br />

on BB pric<strong>in</strong>g does not conta<strong>in</strong> an US operator which is offer<strong>in</strong>g services exceed<strong>in</strong>g 10 Mbps. 524<br />

Wireless <strong>in</strong>frastructure relies on spectrum allocation. The more spectrum is available for BB, the better for the<br />

BB users as prices come down. In this respect, the FCC adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

promote cont<strong>in</strong>ued rapid and efficient deployment of quality-spectrum based services. 525<br />

519 PEW made a study on Older Americans and the Internet. March 2004. http://www.pew<strong>in</strong>ternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Onl<strong>in</strong>e_2004.pdf<br />

(last visited 18. 12. 2004)<br />

520 see also OECD (May 2004), p. 47-48 on pric<strong>in</strong>g of different access technologies <strong>in</strong> the US.<br />

521 See also Figure 79: 38.9% cite too high prices and 44.1% lack of <strong>in</strong>terest/need as the ma<strong>in</strong> reason why they dont subscribe to BB even<br />

though it is available.<br />

522 Pew Internet <strong>Project</strong> Data Memo (2004), p. 2-3.<br />

523 The OECD report covers less than 65% of the comb<strong>in</strong>ed retail market share of providers (as percent of the total BB market). See OECD<br />

(2004), p. 96<br />

524 Table 1 of the Annex OECD (2004), p. 61-62.<br />

525 More specifically, the FCC proposes to lift power levels for BB service providers to cover larger geographic areas. Traditionally, the US<br />

military controls a big part of the frequency spectrum. Negotiations between the Department of Defense and the US Technology Industry<br />

are undergo<strong>in</strong>g as to share spectrum <strong>in</strong> order to provide BB services over the air . OECD (May 2004), p. 52.


8.28.2.4 Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 81: Home BB Market (Source: PEW (2004a))<br />

Page 245 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

PEW asked Internet users why they switched to BB from dial-up. 60% answered that connection speed was<br />

more important than pric<strong>in</strong>g. 526 This high number illustrates the importance of the quality (and usability) of the<br />

network. PEW also asked end users how high their BB bill was. The average bill was $39 with DSL on average<br />

$38 and cable $41. 527 Table 1 shows BB access pric<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the US. The OECD report mentions three trends with<br />

respect to BB pric<strong>in</strong>g (lower<strong>in</strong>g prices by <strong>in</strong>cumbents as a response to <strong>in</strong>creased competition; rais<strong>in</strong>g or lower<strong>in</strong>g<br />

thresholds of their offer<strong>in</strong>gs to make their products more competitive; bundl<strong>in</strong>g of telephony with Internet<br />

services). 528<br />

526<br />

Pew Internet <strong>Project</strong> Data Memo (2004), p. 4.<br />

527<br />

Pew Internet <strong>Project</strong> Data Memo (2004), p. 5.<br />

528<br />

The OECD report discusses gives a brief overview over how <strong>in</strong>cumbent's responded to the <strong>in</strong>creased competition. OECD (2004), p. 58-<br />

60.


Company<br />

Incumbent<br />

Access<br />

type<br />

Payment plan Speed (Kbps) Monthly<br />

char. ($)<br />

Page 246 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Download<br />

Limit<br />

Verizon ADSL With Telephony 1500/128 30 Unlimited 13<br />

Verizon ADSL Without Telephony 1500/128 35 Unlimited 13<br />

Verizon ADSL Bus<strong>in</strong>ess DSL 768/768 130 Unlimited 25<br />

Verizon ADSL Bus<strong>in</strong>ess DSL 7100/768 205 Unlimited 25<br />

SBC ADSL SBC/Yahoo - Basic 384/128 27/40 Unlimited 0<br />

SBC ADSL SBC/Yahoo - Standard 384-1.5/128 27/50 Unlimited 0<br />

SBC ADSL SBC/Yahoo - Deluxe 768-1.5/128 37/60 Unlimited 0<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

Covad ADSL TeleSoho 1500/384 70 Unlimited 0<br />

Covad ADSL TeleSoho 3000/384 150 Unlimited 0<br />

Earthl<strong>in</strong>k ADSL High Speed DSL 768/128 50 Unlimited 0<br />

Alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

TimeWarner CATV Road Runner 2048/384 45 Unlimited 0<br />

TimeWarner CATV RR Pro 2048/384 110 Unlimited 0<br />

TimeWarner CATV RR Corporate 3000/512 300 Unlimited 0<br />

TimeWarner CATV RR Premier 4096/1024 800 Unlimited 0<br />

Comcast CATV<br />

High speed for CC<br />

1500 43 Unlimited 0<br />

customers<br />

Ameril<strong>in</strong>x FWA Residential only 1500/128 25 Unlimited 199<br />

Clearwire FWA Residential 512 50 Unlimited 0<br />

Wheatland BB FWA 512 37 Unlimited 0<br />

Wheatland BB FWA 768 57 Unlimited 0<br />

Wheatland BB FWA 1024 87 Unlimited 0<br />

Evertek FWA Residential 512 35 Unlimited 0<br />

Earthl<strong>in</strong>k Satellite<br />

Earthl<strong>in</strong>k powered by<br />

500/60 70 Unlimited 600<br />

Direcway<br />

Table 44: Broadband prices <strong>in</strong> US October 2003<br />

Install.<br />

char.($)


Page 247 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Table 44 also confirms that FTTH – as the most promis<strong>in</strong>g BB technology <strong>in</strong> terms of transmission capacity – is<br />

not used by <strong>in</strong>cumbents or alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure providers.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, the number of people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas affects the BB penetration rate because costs for connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

those – less profitable – areas are higher than connect<strong>in</strong>g urban areas. In addition, people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas are<br />

less likely to use BB services. PEW reports that only 10% of people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas have BB connections at<br />

home – compared to 28% who live <strong>in</strong> urban and suburband areas. 529 While the generally lower degree of<br />

education, the lower <strong>in</strong>come and the higher age are reasons why BB penetration lacks beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> rural areas, lack<br />

of availability of <strong>in</strong>frastructure also plays a role.<br />

8.28.3 Broadband policy<br />

Broadband <strong>in</strong>itiatives and programs are adopted on federal and state level, with state level measures<br />

outnumber<strong>in</strong>g those on federal level.<br />

The largest Federal program support<strong>in</strong>g BB development <strong>in</strong> rural and remote areas is the Federal Rural<br />

Broadband Access Loan and loan Guarantuee Program started <strong>in</strong> 2003. 1.4 billion US $ <strong>in</strong> loans and loan<br />

guarantees to provide BB services <strong>in</strong> rural areas have been made available on Federal level. The program<br />

focuses on connection speeds of 200 kbs and more provided to communities with less than 20 000 <strong>in</strong>habitants. 530<br />

Another Federal grant program was available for providers of BB transmission services on a “communityoriented<br />

connectivity” basis. Focus lies on connect<strong>in</strong>g rural schools and other education centers, health care<br />

providers, other public <strong>in</strong>stitutions as well as residents and bus<strong>in</strong>esses. 531 In 2002, $ 20 million were made<br />

available through the program.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g state level <strong>in</strong>itiatives, the Telecommunications Industry of America (TIA) has compiled a list of those<br />

State measures. 532 Moreover, the Alliance for Public Technology (APT) 533 has published a useful report on<br />

Broadband Policy Experiments <strong>in</strong> the States, which we have used for this section and for the annex534 . The APT<br />

report makes a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between a couple of different types of policies regard<strong>in</strong>g Broadband. In particular,<br />

measures relate to:<br />

• the sett<strong>in</strong>g up of facilitators (Broadband Authorities/Agencies),<br />

• tax credits,<br />

• state-owned (research and educational) networks,<br />

• demand aggregation programs<br />

• fund<strong>in</strong>g programs,<br />

• and public/private partnerships.<br />

In many cases there is no clear dist<strong>in</strong>ction possible. In addition, the projects have not been <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong>-depth.<br />

Hence, table 2 merely sketches out <strong>in</strong>itiatives undertaken by on state level <strong>in</strong> the US, show<strong>in</strong>g that the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

focus lies on network expansion rather than on the uptake and end user (though only 9% of the users cite nonavailability<br />

as the ma<strong>in</strong> reason why they don’t have BB at home).<br />

Table 45 shows that most States have <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong> place which focus on network rollout and fund<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

expansion. Most of these networks are foremost for educational, governmental and medical usage, but <strong>in</strong> some<br />

cases private parties can connect as well. The most successful states <strong>in</strong> terms of BB uptake rates are briefly<br />

highlighted.<br />

New Hampshire has a very high number of Internet users (between 68.2% and 72.6%). The State is rather<br />

wealthy, small and there are only 1.2 million <strong>in</strong>habitants. APT reports for <strong>in</strong>stance that New Hampshire<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced a demand aggregation program funded with $250 000. The New Hampshire program is modelled<br />

after Berkshire Connect <strong>in</strong> Western Massachusetts. 535536 Another network <strong>in</strong>itiative is North County Connect.<br />

529<br />

Pew Internet <strong>Project</strong> Data Memo (2004), p. 7.<br />

530<br />

http://www.usda.gov/rus/telecom/broadband.htm#<strong>in</strong>fo (last visited 14.12.2004).<br />

531<br />

Community Connect Broadband Grant Program:<br />

http://www.usda.gov/rus/telecom/<strong>in</strong>itiatives/<strong>in</strong>dex_<strong>in</strong>itiatives.htm#broadband (last visited 14.12.2004).<br />

532<br />

Jon S. Beamer, “State Broadband Initiatives”, Fall 2002. http://www.tiaonl<strong>in</strong>e.org/policy/states.cfm<br />

533<br />

The Alliance for Public Technology is a nonprofit membership organization based <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C., dedicated to ensur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

widespread access to advanced telecommunications technologies.<br />

534<br />

A Nation of Laboratories: Broadband Policy Experiments <strong>in</strong> the States (March 2004); available at http://www.apt.org/publica/ (last<br />

visited: 18. Nov 2004).<br />

535<br />

http://itc.mit.edu/itel/docs/2001/Berkshire_Connect.pdf (MIT case study on the Berkshire Program).<br />

536<br />

http://www.bconnect.org/ (last visited: 08.12.2004).


Page 248 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Agency Tax Credits Network Fund<strong>in</strong>g Programs Public-Private Partnership<br />

Alabama ASA AREN<br />

Alaska TIC TOPAZ<br />

Arizona<br />

Arkansas<br />

ASPIN GADA<br />

California CENIC CTF; CalTIP<br />

Colorado MNT; Learn<strong>in</strong>g NW<br />

Connecticut<br />

Delaware<br />

CET<br />

Florida DDC<br />

Georgia<br />

Hawaii<br />

Yamacra<br />

Idaho Tax credit<br />

Ill<strong>in</strong>ois ICN; IHA ICTF<br />

Indiana ITN<br />

Iowa ICN<br />

Kansas KanEd<br />

Kentucky ConnectKentucky<br />

Louisiana LANet<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e MSLN MTEAF<br />

Maryland FiberNet MSTF<br />

Massachusetts Berkshire Connect<br />

Michigan MBDA LINK-Michigan Loan programs<br />

M<strong>in</strong>nesota Conect<strong>in</strong>g M<strong>in</strong>nesota (failed)<br />

Mississippi<br />

Missouri MOREnet<br />

Montana Tax Credits METNET<br />

Nebraska NITC IEF; CTF<br />

Nevada<br />

New Hampshire<br />

NevadaNet<br />

New Jersey Njedge.net ETIF<br />

New Mexico BMAC<br />

New York Diffusion Fund<br />

North Carol<strong>in</strong>a e-NC<br />

North Dakota StageNet<br />

Ohio Schoolnet ThirdFrontier<br />

Oklahoma OneNet. Inc<br />

Oregon ORTCC Tax Credit<br />

Pennsylvania BFTDA<br />

Rhode Island RINET<br />

South Carol<strong>in</strong>a SCINET RAIF<br />

Table 45<br />

Initially another demand aggregation program, it failed <strong>in</strong>ter alia because of BB providers which selectively<br />

offered their services to the most profitable North Country Communities. Now the Task Force with<strong>in</strong> this project<br />

hosts “tech fairs” which give communities the opportunity to hear from market participants on new products and<br />

services. It has also been considered to roll out a wholly owned fibre network. 537 However, the last news on their<br />

website are dated August 2003. 538<br />

537<br />

A Nation of Laboratories: Broadband Policy Experiments <strong>in</strong> the States (March 2004); available at http://www.apt.org/publica/ (last<br />

visited: 18. Nov 2004).; p. 28.<br />

538<br />

http://www.northcountryconnect.org/update.html (last visit: 8. 12. 2004).


Page 249 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

M<strong>in</strong>nesota has a BB uptake rate of between 66.8% - 71.1% which puts it <strong>in</strong> the lead<strong>in</strong>g tier. M<strong>in</strong>nesota has<br />

more than 5 million <strong>in</strong>habitants and from States with more than 3 million <strong>in</strong>habitants it has the highest Internet<br />

uptake rate. Connect<strong>in</strong>g M<strong>in</strong>nesota was an ambitious project aimed at roll<strong>in</strong>g out a fibre network. However, due<br />

to <strong>in</strong>sufficient fund<strong>in</strong>g and bankruptcy of the private partner, the project was cancelled. 539 Subsequently, <strong>in</strong> July<br />

2004, a regional program has been put <strong>in</strong> place which br<strong>in</strong>gs together private and public entities and a Regional<br />

Economic Development (RED) group has been set up. 540 RED <strong>in</strong>tends to share <strong>in</strong>formation and ideas, track<br />

development <strong>in</strong>itiatives and then help regions apply lessons about what works and what doesn't. 541 Members and<br />

a few private not-for-profit organizations sponsor the program and <strong>in</strong>stitution.<br />

Utah has a BB uptake rate of between 67.2% and 71.9%, with roughly 2.3 million <strong>in</strong>habitants. It has a couple<br />

of programs <strong>in</strong> place. By far the biggest is UTOPIA 542 , a $ 400 million project consist<strong>in</strong>g of 14 cities <strong>in</strong> Utah<br />

which aims to establish a fibre network between its members. A $ 700 000 study was conducted and it estimated<br />

costs for connect<strong>in</strong>g homes to be $1408 per household. After completion, the network will be offered to private<br />

competitors at wholesale prices. However, this program has fund<strong>in</strong>g difficulties and some of members have<br />

already abandoned the project. 543 Utah is also very active <strong>in</strong> public education. UtahEducationNetwork (UEN), 544<br />

UtahL<strong>in</strong>k 545 and EDNET (video conferenc<strong>in</strong>g) are some examples which focus not only on BB <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

rollout, but also addresses the user and service level. For example, commercial entities can rent the EDNET<br />

system for 100$ per hour. 546<br />

Wyom<strong>in</strong>g, with less than 500 000 <strong>in</strong>habitants, has a BB uptake rate between 66% and 70.8%. SweetNet 547 aims<br />

to establish a network which is owned by the communities Green River and Rock Spr<strong>in</strong>gs. SweetNet is a<br />

wholesale carrier-class network provid<strong>in</strong>g availability of connections to every residence, bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />

government facility and marks the perfect partnership for the public and private sectors. Another project is the<br />

Wyom<strong>in</strong>g Equality Network which connects all public schools and provides various services. Specifically, the<br />

network is used for distance learn<strong>in</strong>g. 548 Today, the network serves all state high schools and community colleges<br />

and all of the University of Wyom<strong>in</strong>g. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the Wyom<strong>in</strong>g Education Gateway is <strong>in</strong>tended for teachers,<br />

students and parents and allows them to gather <strong>in</strong>formation and participate <strong>in</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e courses. 549<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State has a BB uptake rate between 65.7% and 70.3%. Figure 82 is from 2004 and was published<br />

by the Utilies and Transport Commission. It shows that <strong>in</strong> many counties there are more than 3 service<br />

providers. 550<br />

The public Department of Information Services of the State of Wash<strong>in</strong>gton offers among others the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

“best practice tools and services” to adm<strong>in</strong>istrative <strong>in</strong>stitutions to help preserve limited budget resources: Digital<br />

Academy, Master Contracts – Technology, Satellite Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g, Technology Broker<strong>in</strong>g Services, Video<br />

Production, Web Templates and Styleguides, Webcast<strong>in</strong>g. These services are limited to state and local agencies.<br />

Generally, these best practice tools and services allow for a demand aggregation and mass discounts. Eligible are<br />

only state and local agencies. 551 Wash<strong>in</strong>gton also has a K20 Educational Telecommunications Network put <strong>in</strong><br />

place. Most of the public educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions are connected to the FiberNetwork. 552 The website states it was<br />

the first of its k<strong>in</strong>d and started <strong>in</strong> 1996. Only public education <strong>in</strong>stitutions but not <strong>in</strong>dividuals and/or companies<br />

are connected.<br />

539 A Nation of Laboratories: Broadband Policy Experiments <strong>in</strong> the States (March 2004); available at http://www.apt.org/publica/ (last<br />

visited: 18. Nov 2004).; p. 24.<br />

540 http://www.bizjournals.com/tw<strong>in</strong>cities/stories/2004/05/31/daily23.html<br />

541 http://www.mcknight.org/about/news_detail.aspx?itemID=1417&catID=54&typeID=2<br />

542 http://www.utopianet.org/<br />

543 http://www.thespectrum.com/news/stories/20040323/localnews/131254.html<br />

544 http://www.uen.org/ (last visited: 08.12.2004).<br />

545 http://www.nascio.org/awards/1998awards/Network<strong>in</strong>g/utah.cfm (The program received an awarded from NASCIO <strong>in</strong> 2001. NASCIO<br />

represents state chief <strong>in</strong>formation officers and <strong>in</strong>formation resource executives and managers from the 50 states. State members are<br />

senior officials from any of the three branches of state government who have executive-level and statewide responsibility for <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

resource management. Private-sector firms and non-profit organizations may jo<strong>in</strong> as corporate members. (last visited: 08.12.2004).<br />

546 http://www.uen.org/policy/html/feeschedule.html (last visited: 08.12.2004).<br />

547 Southwestern Wyom<strong>in</strong>g Enhanced and Expanded Telecommunications Network; http://sweetnet.us/network/faqs/General.html (last<br />

visited: 08.12.2004).<br />

548 The network is the result of a State Supreme Court decision <strong>in</strong> 1995 and subsequent legislation <strong>in</strong> 1997 which mandated the development<br />

and implementation of a statewide education technology plan. APT, p. 45.<br />

549 http://wyom<strong>in</strong>g.edgate.org/<strong>in</strong>dex.php (last visited: 08.12.2004).<br />

550 http://www.wutc.wa.gov/webdocs.nsf/a23294935a25d43488256e77007df5dc/eafb92498fac081888256ed200561d7e!OpenDocument<br />

(last visited: 8.12. 2004).<br />

551 http://dis.wa.gov/bestpractices/disbestpractices.htm (last visited: 8.12. 2004).<br />

552 http://www.wa-k20.net/members/<strong>in</strong>dex.html (last visited: 8.12. 2004).


8.28.4 Conclusion<br />

Figure 82: BB Competition <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State<br />

Page 250 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The country with the highest GDP ranks only 10 th <strong>in</strong> terms of broadband uptake. Recent statistics show and<br />

somewhat quantify the importance of education and <strong>in</strong>come distribution on BB uptake at home. While 40% of<br />

all college gradautes have a BB at home the national average is only 24%.<br />

When asked for the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons why there is no BB connection at home, 38.9% say its too expensive and<br />

44.1% are not <strong>in</strong>terested or don’t need BB. Also importantly, only 9.8% say that non-availability is the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

reason for not hav<strong>in</strong>g BB at home. While pric<strong>in</strong>g can be addressed by <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure, the “need and<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest” can only be tackled by <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> services and by mak<strong>in</strong>g users more familiar with us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Internet.<br />

As for State measures, the most successful States (New Hampshire, Utah, Wyom<strong>in</strong>g, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, M<strong>in</strong>nesota)<br />

have some k<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>in</strong>itiatives which focus on the BB development. Generally, those <strong>in</strong>itiatives focus on network<br />

expansion, fund<strong>in</strong>g programs and often take the form of private-public partnerships.<br />

8.28.5 ANNEX State Broadband Initiatives (Resources (taken from the 2004 APT report)<br />

Alabama<br />

Alabama Supercomputer Authority (ASA) http://www.asc.edu/<strong>in</strong>dex.shtml<br />

Alabama Research and Education Network (AREN)http://www.asc.edu/network/<strong>in</strong>dex.shtml<br />

Alaska<br />

Telecommunications Information Council Activities Update: Office of the Lt. Governor – January 2002<br />

http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ltgov/Telecommunications/TICupdate2002.PDF<br />

Arizona<br />

Arizona Telemedic<strong>in</strong>e Program (ATP) http://www.telemedic<strong>in</strong>e.arizona.edu/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

“Arizona’s 100 Million Dollar Plan for Rural Broadband Deployment”<br />

http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org/content/stories/<strong>in</strong>dex.cfm?key=134<br />

“News Release: TOPAZ Connect<strong>in</strong>g Schools and Rural Areas Ahead of Schedule with Broadband”<br />

http://gita.state.az.us/telecom/news/9_25_01_news_release.htm<br />

Arkansas<br />

No BB Strategy as of summer 2003<br />

California<br />

Rural E-commerce Grants<br />

http://www.motherlodeexpress.org/Docs/State%20press%20release%20ecommerce%20grants__.pdf<br />

California Technology Investment Partnership http://www.larta.org/Capital/caltip.asp<br />

New Generation Internet (NGI) http://www.calngi.org/program/


Page 251 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Corporation for Education Network Initiatives <strong>in</strong> California (CENIC http://www.cenic.org<br />

Colorado<br />

“The Multi-Use Network <strong>Project</strong>” http://www.colorado.gov/dpa/doit/mnt/<br />

Connecticut<br />

Commission for Education Technology http://www.ct.gov/ctedtech/site/default.asp?cenPNavCtr=|#30930<br />

Delaware<br />

No BB Strategy as of summer 2003.<br />

District of Columbia<br />

Internet Open Access Study Act of 2001: Bill 14-6<br />

http://www.dcwatch.com/council14/14-6.htm<br />

Florida<br />

Digital Divide Council http://www.digitaldividecouncil.com/digitaldivide/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

Digital Divide Council: Annual Report 2002<br />

http://www.digitaldividecouncil.com/digitaldivide/documents/annual_report.doc<br />

Georgia<br />

Yamacraw Initiative http://www.yamacraw.org/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

Georgia Centers for Advanced Telecommunications Technology (GCATT)<br />

http://www.gcatt.gatech.edu/<strong>in</strong>dex.htm<br />

Hawaii<br />

No BB Strategy as of summer 2003.<br />

Idaho<br />

Broadband Tax Credit www.puc.state.id.us/telecom/28784.pdf<br />

Ill<strong>in</strong>ois<br />

Program to Foster the Elim<strong>in</strong>ation of the Digital Divide<br />

http://www.state.il.us/gov/budgetpr/cmsbudget.htm<br />

Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Community Technology Fund http://www.ictf.org/<br />

Indiana<br />

accessIndiana http://www.<strong>in</strong>.gov/<br />

EPICS http://eic.co.orange.<strong>in</strong>.us/<br />

Intelenet Grant Program http://www.<strong>in</strong>.gov/<strong>in</strong>tel/schoolgrants/<br />

Indiana Web Academy http://www.<strong>in</strong>dianaacademy.org/<br />

Indiana Telecommunications Network http://www.itn.gov/<br />

IN-map http://www.<strong>in</strong>-map.net/<br />

Iowa<br />

Iowa Communications Network (ICN) www.icn.state.ia.us<br />

Kansas<br />

KanED www.kan-ed.org<br />

Kentucky<br />

“A Broadband Hookup <strong>in</strong> Every Home”<br />

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,57249,00.html<br />

ConnectKentucky www.connectkentucky.org<br />

Kentucky Information Highway http://www.state.ky.us/kirm/kih.htm<br />

Louisiana<br />

LaNet http://www.state.la.us/otm/lanet/<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e<br />

“Future MSLN” http://www.msln.ma<strong>in</strong>e.edu/msln/docs/adv_brd_letter.html<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>e School and Library Network (MSLN) http://www.msln.ma<strong>in</strong>e.edu/<br />

Maryland<br />

ARINC Expands FiberNet for Montgomery County, Connects 100th Site<br />

http://www.ar<strong>in</strong>c.com/news/2003/02-03-03.html


Page 252 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

TEDCO “Improv<strong>in</strong>g Access to Broadband Infrastructure <strong>in</strong> Mounta<strong>in</strong> Maryland”<br />

http://www.marylandtedco.org/WesternMD.htm<br />

Massachusetts<br />

Berkshire Connect www.bconnect.org<br />

The MassBroadband Initiative http://www.massbroadband.org/<br />

Massachusetts Technology Collaborative http://www.mtpc.org/InnovationEconomy/telecom_projects.htm<br />

Michigan<br />

Michigan Broadband Authority http://www.michigan.gov/cis/0,1607,7-154-28077_28233---,00.html<br />

L<strong>in</strong>k Michigan http://l<strong>in</strong>kmichigan.michigan.org<br />

M<strong>in</strong>nesota<br />

Connect<strong>in</strong>g M<strong>in</strong>nesota http://www.dot.state.mn.us/connect<br />

“M<strong>in</strong>nesota Kills $200 Million Rural High-Speed Access <strong>Project</strong>”<br />

http://www.govtech.net/news/features/news_feature.phtml?docid=3800<br />

Mississippi<br />

Mississippi Legislature 2003 Regular Session: Senate Bill 2979<br />

http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/2003/pdf/history/SB/SB2979.htm<br />

Missouri<br />

eMINTS http://em<strong>in</strong>ts.more.net/<br />

MOREnet http://www.more.net/<br />

Montana<br />

METNET www.metnet.state.mt.us/ma<strong>in</strong>.html<br />

Nebraska<br />

Internet Enhancement Fund http://www.nitc.state.ne.us/<br />

Information Technology Commission http://www.nitc.state.ne.us/<br />

Nevada<br />

Commission on Educational Technology http://www.nde.state.nv.us/hrt/edtech/cet/<br />

Nevada Net “System Comput<strong>in</strong>g Services” http://www.scs.nevada.edu/nevadanet/<br />

New Hampshire<br />

“Network<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> New Hampshire: Third Rail deploys fixed broadband for state’s<br />

National Guard” http://www.broadbandweek.com/news/010122/010122_apps_third.htm<br />

“New Hampshire officials try to spread high-tech to all parts of the state”<br />

http://www.seacoastonl<strong>in</strong>e.com/2001news/2_12biz.htm<br />

New Jersey<br />

“New Jersey Creates a $100-Million Broadband Network for Its Colleges”<br />

http://chronicle.com/free/2002/04/2002040901u.htm<br />

New Jersey Telecommunications Network Upgrade<br />

https://www.nascio.org/publications/Newsletters/0601statetrends.cfm<br />

Njedge.net http://www.njedge.net/<br />

New Mexico<br />

Broadband Management Advisory Committee http://www.cio.state.nm.us/BMACCharter.pdf<br />

New York<br />

Diffusion Fund www.nysed.gov/otpad/diffuse.htm<br />

Regional Fiber Optic System http://www.uwnyc.org/technews/v2_n5_a6.htmltm<br />

North Carol<strong>in</strong>a<br />

North Carol<strong>in</strong>a’s Rural Internet Access Authority: e-NC http://www.e-nc.org/<br />

North Dakota<br />

STAGENet http://www.stagenet.nd.gov/<br />

Ohio<br />

Third Frontier <strong>Project</strong> www.state.oh.us/gov/thirdfrontier.htm<br />

Ohio SchoolNet http://www.ohioschoolnet.k12.oh.us/<br />

Oklahoma


Page 253 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

OneNET http://www.onenet.net<br />

“Wireless Broadband Opens Doors for Rural U.S. Communities”<br />

http://www.wirelessnesfactor.com/perl/story/12805.html<br />

Oregon<br />

ORTCC http://www.ortcc.org/<br />

Oregon Broadband Tax Credit http://www.econ.state.or.us/telecom/div106.htm<br />

Pennsylvania<br />

“Digital Divide <strong>Project</strong>s Announced” http://www.121.org/news/newsarticle.html?ID=219<br />

Technology Based Education Initiatives – L<strong>in</strong>k 2 Learn/Pennsylvania Education Network/Ben Frankl<strong>in</strong><br />

Technology Development Authority http://www.<strong>in</strong>ventpa.com/default.aspx?id=135<br />

Rhode Island<br />

Rhode Island Network for Educational Technology (RINET) www.ri.net/RINET/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

South Carol<strong>in</strong>a<br />

“Bill Seeks to Exempt Internet Service From Regulation”<br />

http://www.computeruser.com/news/03/02/17/news5.html<br />

South Carol<strong>in</strong>a Information Network (SCINET) www.state.sc.us/<br />

http://www.edweek.org/sreports/tc/policy/states/sc.htm<br />

South Dakota<br />

“Build<strong>in</strong>g the Digital Dakota Network” http://www.state.sd.us/deca/DDN4Learn<strong>in</strong>g/Conclave/DDNHist.htm<br />

Tennessee<br />

ConnecTEN www.connect-tn.org<br />

Texas<br />

Telecommunications Infrastructure Fund http://www.lonestarbroadband.org<br />

Utah<br />

Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency www.utopianet.org<br />

Utah Education Network www.uen.org<br />

Utah Telehealth Network http://www.utahtelehealth.net/<br />

EDNET http://www.uen.org/ednet/<br />

Vermont<br />

Vermont Broadband Council www.vtbroadband.org/<br />

Virg<strong>in</strong>ia<br />

Blacksburg Electronic Village (BEV) http://www.bev.net/<br />

eCorridors http://ecorridors.cc.vt.edu/<strong>in</strong>dex.shtml<br />

Center for Innovative Technology (CIT) http://www.cit.org/<br />

Net.Work.Virg<strong>in</strong>ia http://www.networkvirg<strong>in</strong>ia.net/<br />

“Virg<strong>in</strong>ia’s Center for Innovative Technology Awards Grants to Augusta, Highland, and Nelson Counties”<br />

http://www.cit.org/press_releases/01-07-25.PR%<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

Access Wash<strong>in</strong>gton www.wa.gov/dis/k20<br />

West Virg<strong>in</strong>ia<br />

YAS Broadband Initiative http://www.lcsee.cemr.wvu.edu/yas/<br />

West Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Department of Education Office of Technology http://access.k12.wv.us/<br />

West Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Network (WVNET) http://www.wvnet.edu/wvndex.shtml<br />

Wiscons<strong>in</strong><br />

Wiscnet http://www.wiscnet.net/<br />

Wyom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Southwestern Wyom<strong>in</strong>g Enhanced & Expanded Telecommunications Network (SWEETnet)<br />

http://www.sweetnet.us<br />

Wyom<strong>in</strong>g Equality Network http://www.k12.wy.us/


8.29 Non-EU country studies: Japan<br />

8.29.1 Introduction<br />

Page 254 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Japan is well positioned country for the <strong>in</strong>formation society. The advanced state of BB networks – both <strong>in</strong> terms<br />

of quantity (penetration rates) and quality (capacity) – competitive pric<strong>in</strong>g and the attitude of Japanese people<br />

towards technology are among the chief factors why Japan has an advantage over other countries. For those<br />

reasons, this case study focuses on technology, pric<strong>in</strong>g and users.<br />

The prime source for this case study is a 2004 White Paper published by the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Public Management,<br />

Home Affairs, Posts and Telecommunications <strong>in</strong> July 2004 (MIC). 553 In addition to “traditional” content (e.g.<br />

most popular services) and <strong>in</strong>frastructure (e.g. pric<strong>in</strong>g and penetration rates) related <strong>in</strong>formation, the 2004 MIC<br />

White Paper conta<strong>in</strong>s some useful <strong>in</strong>formation on the important “human factor” (end user).<br />

8.29.2 The broadband market<br />

The converged <strong>in</strong>formation and communications <strong>in</strong>dustry accounted for 61 trillion Yen or 11.5% of Japan's real<br />

GDP. While overall growth of the Japanese economy was 1% between 1995 and 2002, the <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

communication <strong>in</strong>dustry witnessed average growth rates of 7.1% <strong>in</strong> the same period. 554<br />

Figure 83: BB <strong>in</strong>troduction and uptake compared to other consumer goods<br />

and communication services (Source: OECD) 555<br />

Penetration of broadband Internet services was extremely successful. After only three years BB penetration rates<br />

have reached roughly a third of all households. Figure 83 shows that this <strong>in</strong>crease is even faster than<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction of mobile phones and color TV <strong>in</strong> the early 90-ies and late 60-ies. In absolute figures, at the end of<br />

2003, there were 77.3 million Internet users <strong>in</strong> Japan and 26.07 million (or roughly a third) were connected via<br />

BB. 556 Important for the high BB numbers, 78.2% of the households are equipped with PCs which are as multimedia<br />

term<strong>in</strong>als essential for any bandwidth <strong>in</strong>tensive service. 557<br />

With respect to supply-<strong>in</strong>frastructure dimensions, Japan is the clear global leader. At the end of 2003, roughly<br />

15 million subscribers were connected to the Internet via various BB technologies. Figure 84 gives an overview<br />

over different access technologies and subscriber numbers. No other country has such advanced communication<br />

networks <strong>in</strong> place and nowhere are prices – measured <strong>in</strong> US$ per kbs – lower 558 . With the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g creation of<br />

553<br />

Information and Communications <strong>in</strong> Japan 2004 Feature: Build<strong>in</strong>g a Ubiquitous Network Society That Spreads Throughout the World<br />

(<strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g cited as “MIC (2004)”. Onl<strong>in</strong>e version available at:<br />

http://www.johotsus<strong>in</strong>tokei.soumu.go.jp/whitepaper/eng/WP2004/press_<strong>in</strong>formation01.pdf<br />

554<br />

For more <strong>in</strong>fo on the <strong>in</strong>formation and communication market see ICJ 2004 p. 41-44..<br />

555<br />

ICCP BB update, Oct 2003; http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/18/9/18464850.pdf<br />

556<br />

MIC (2004), p. 6.<br />

557<br />

MIC (2004), p. 49.<br />

558<br />

OECD (2004), Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Prices <strong>in</strong> the OECD (June 2004). Available at:<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/17/32143101.pdf ; For more <strong>in</strong>fo on pric<strong>in</strong>g see section XXX.


Page 255 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

bandwidth-<strong>in</strong>tensive onl<strong>in</strong>e services and content (onl<strong>in</strong>e Music distribution; Video-on-Demand, Videoconferenc<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

HDTV etc.) the existence of an advanced <strong>in</strong>frastructure becomes a key factor which determ<strong>in</strong>es<br />

the global rank<strong>in</strong>g. In a few years, formally BB penetration rates will reach levels like fixed telephone l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Once this po<strong>in</strong>t is reached, network quality (and not so much quantity <strong>in</strong> terms of connected nodes) will make a<br />

crucial difference.<br />

Figure 84: BB Subscribers and access technologies 559<br />

As for the technologically most advanced access technology (FTTH), MIC reports that <strong>in</strong>stallation of a<br />

nationwide optical fiber network was completed to 80% by the end of 2003. 94% of cities designated by the<br />

government and 86% of cities with more than 100 000 <strong>in</strong>habitants have been connected. In other cities<br />

<strong>in</strong>stallation has reached 59%, but <strong>in</strong> some other cites there is still a big gap. 560 Figure 2 also shows that FTTH<br />

witnessed a strong 3.7 fold <strong>in</strong>crease from 310 000 <strong>in</strong> 2002 to 1.14 million <strong>in</strong> 2003. The uptake rate of FTTH is<br />

important because it is virtually only FTTH which is capable of deliver<strong>in</strong>g a variety of high quality TV channels<br />

to a mass market – one of the services that promises to be a “killer application”.<br />

In addition to those mostly “fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e subscribers”, hotspots and wireless access po<strong>in</strong>ts are also <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(from 1624 to 5350 at the end of 2003). Importantly, use of hot spots <strong>in</strong>creased to 9.5% up from 0.7% <strong>in</strong> 2002. 561<br />

Unlike fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e BB access at home or work, especially WLANs allow for “semi-mobile” access to bandwidth<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensive multi-media content and services. Figure 85 shows the impressive development of BB penetration <strong>in</strong><br />

comparison to other technologies. While ISDN and dial-up connections decreased from 2002 to 2003, BB<br />

access witnessed strong growth. By the end of 2003 BB Internet has by far surpassed dial-up access. 562<br />

559 MIC (2004), p. 6.<br />

560 MIC (2004), p. 44.<br />

561 MIC (2004), p. 9.<br />

562 MIC (2004), p 6.<br />

Figure 85: Broadband growth


8.29.2.1 Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Page 256 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The most advanced networks will not become attractive to the mass market if pric<strong>in</strong>g rema<strong>in</strong>s at high levels. In<br />

this respect, Japan has the lowest prices for BB access. Table 46 shows pric<strong>in</strong>g for various access technologies.<br />

There are only unlimited offers and the – slowest (!) – BB speed offered (covered by the OECD report) is 1.5<br />

MB.<br />

Company Access type Payment plan<br />

Incumbent<br />

Speed<br />

(Kbps/MB)<br />

Monthly<br />

char. ($)<br />

Download<br />

Limit<br />

Install.<br />

charge ($)<br />

NTT East ADSL 1.5 M type 1.5MB/512 40.25 Unlimited 34<br />

NTT East ADSL 8 M type 8MB/1024 40.69 Unlimited 34<br />

NTT East ADSL More II (24 type) 24MB/1024 41.57 Unlimited 34<br />

NTT East FTTH Shared Connections for apartments 100MB 52.45 Unlimited 105<br />

NTT East FTTH Shared connection for stand alone dwell<strong>in</strong>gs 100MB 67.05 Unlimited 240<br />

NTT East FTTH L<strong>in</strong>e dedicated to s<strong>in</strong>gle connection 100MB 158.33 Unlimited 240<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

Yahoo BB ADSL Yahoo BB 8M 8MB/900 21.65 Unlimited 34<br />

Yahoo BB ADSL Yahoo BB 26M 26MB/1024 25.19 Unlimited 34<br />

eAccess ADSL ADSL Plus(Q) 40MB/1024 38.46 Unlimited 27<br />

Alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

J-Com Net CATV J-Com Net 8MB/2048 42.25 Unlimited 114<br />

USEN FTTH Stand alone dwell<strong>in</strong>gs 100 MB 50.42 Unlimited 292<br />

USEN FTTH Apartments 100 MB 35.38 Unlimited 159<br />

KDDI Fibre/VDSL Hikari Plus VDSL 563 70MB/30MB 28.02 564 Unlimited 186<br />

KDDI Fibre/Ethernet Hikari Plus Ethernet 565 100MB 24.62 566 Unlimited 167<br />

Table 46: Broadband prices <strong>in</strong> Japan October 2003 567<br />

Pric<strong>in</strong>g for BB ultra-high speed access is very affordable <strong>in</strong> Japan. A s<strong>in</strong>gle ADSL l<strong>in</strong>e by the <strong>in</strong>cumbent NTT<br />

East with 24MB/1MB costs only 42 US $. Competitor Yahoo BB charges a mere 25 US $ for a higher speed. As<br />

FTTH is not only offered by the <strong>in</strong>cumbent but also by a range of competitors and alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

providers, <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition certa<strong>in</strong>ly is one of the reasons why pric<strong>in</strong>g for access is so low and uptake<br />

is rather high. Incument NTT East is heavily <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g not only <strong>in</strong> their core technology (xDSL), but also <strong>in</strong> new<br />

fiber networks (unlike Deutsche Telekom for example which prime focus is on a s<strong>in</strong>gle xDSL technology).<br />

563 Charges for these plans are only applied if 16 or more contracts are expected to be signed by the residents <strong>in</strong> the same build<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

564 These monthly charges are applied if users subscribe to KDDI's package plan with their telephony service called Hikari Plus Phone.<br />

565 Charges for these plans are only applied if 16 or more contracts are expected to be signed by the residents <strong>in</strong> the same build<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

566 These monthly charges are applied if users subscribe to KDDI's package plan with their telephony service called Hikari Plus Phone.<br />

567 OECD (2004), p. 37.


8.29.2.2 Content<br />

Page 257 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Another factor which has an impact on the end user decision to sign up for BB access services is the content that<br />

is available. The more content is available and the lower its price <strong>in</strong> relation to comparable off-l<strong>in</strong>e services, the<br />

more <strong>in</strong>centives do users have to sign up for BB. Traditionally, a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

has been made. Content encompasses not only audio-visual content, but <strong>in</strong>cludes also <strong>in</strong>teractive, on-demand<br />

services which are made possible over the Internet. In addition, <strong>in</strong> the near future, offl<strong>in</strong>e brick and mortar<br />

devices (and not only PC and mobile phones) are also go<strong>in</strong>g to be connected to the Internet via RFID tags (see<br />

below). One can expect that an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g amount of services, content and brick-and-mortar devices which are<br />

accessible and controllable over the Internet will have a positive <strong>in</strong>fluence on the number of BB subscribers.<br />

The impressive advanced state of the networks and affordable pric<strong>in</strong>g means that bandwidth <strong>in</strong>tensive services<br />

can already by delivered to Japanese BB subscribers. In 2003, there were 8860 operators provid<strong>in</strong>g Internet<br />

services <strong>in</strong> Japan. 568 Such a high number clearly has a strong correlation to the sophisticated and affordable<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> place.<br />

Figure 86: Most commonly used Services<br />

The most common services used by <strong>in</strong>dividuals are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 86. While “dial-up” services such as e-mail,<br />

search<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>formation on goods and services, on news and purchas<strong>in</strong>g of products onl<strong>in</strong>e are still by far the<br />

most common usages of the Internet, BB connections are much faster and more cost-efficient. In addition to<br />

those “traditional” services, pure BB services such as the download<strong>in</strong>g of movies already accounts for 17%.<br />

Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, more people use the Internet to download/view movies than music. This relatively high number<br />

also shows the advanced state and subsequent usage of BB Internet. Another application with tremendous<br />

potential is IP telephony. Market share of this technology has <strong>in</strong>creased enormously and 7.3% of all households<br />

were us<strong>in</strong>g IP telephony at the end of 2003. 11.1% of all bus<strong>in</strong>esses used IP Telephony and 42.7% are plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>in</strong>troduce it <strong>in</strong> the near future. 569<br />

Total Internet content on “.jp” doma<strong>in</strong>s has reached 13 609 GB <strong>in</strong> 2003 which is a 45-fold <strong>in</strong>crease s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

February 1998. The total number of files reached 291.73 million - a 15fold <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the six years. 570<br />

MIC conducts “Census of Information Flow” to evaluate <strong>in</strong> a quantitative way the volume of varied <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

flow that makes up the <strong>in</strong>formation environment. In the last 10 years (fiscal 1992 to fiscal 2002), the average<br />

growth rate was 28.4% for <strong>in</strong>formation supplied, 24.4% for <strong>in</strong>formation transmitted, 10.2% for selectable<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation, 8.7% for consumable <strong>in</strong>formation, and 17.8% for <strong>in</strong>formation consumed. 571 Figure 87 shows which<br />

“for-fee” services are most accessed by users. Software, Music, video and games are the prime forms of content<br />

which Japanese pay for.<br />

568 MIC (2004), p. 43.<br />

569 MIC (2004), p. 9.<br />

570 MIC (2004), p. 46. More <strong>in</strong>fo on usage can be found from p. 46-7.<br />

571 Id.


Figure 87: For-Fee Content<br />

Page 258 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Another <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g technological development relates to Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) which will<br />

extent the reach of the Internet beyond PCs and mobile phones. In the not too distant future wash<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

lamps and many other brick-and-mortar devices can be accessed and controlled via the Internet.<br />

Figure 88: Introduction of Systems and Services the Use Ubiquitous Tools<br />

Figure 88 shows three key areas with <strong>in</strong>novative services/applications/devices (IC dards, RFID tags and other<br />

new communication devices) which Japanse firms are work<strong>in</strong>g/experiment<strong>in</strong>g with. Though usage of those<br />

devices today is still low, connect<strong>in</strong>g brick-and-mortar, non-communications devices to the Internet could be<br />

attractive and <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to many users.<br />

With respect to the Internet usage by companies, the MIC report gives some valuable <strong>in</strong>formation on the<br />

important “human factor”. 572 MIC states that “The importance of develop<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g well-<strong>in</strong>formed<br />

human resources to address the grow<strong>in</strong>g corporate competition aris<strong>in</strong>g from the creation of new services, and<br />

deal with the threats of unauthorized access and virus <strong>in</strong>fections, is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g.” The White Paper conta<strong>in</strong>s an<br />

572 MIC (2004), p. 48; 62-63.


Page 259 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

<strong>in</strong>formative section on the issue “security” and has some surveys what companies and <strong>in</strong>dividuals are do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

this respect. 573<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals, at the end of 2003, there were 77.30 million users access<strong>in</strong>g the Internet primarily from<br />

home, work and school, which translates <strong>in</strong>to a 60% penetration rate. 574 Apart from this steadily <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

number of subscribers, the amount which is spent on <strong>in</strong>formation and communication services with<strong>in</strong> household<br />

expenses also <strong>in</strong>creased 0.3% to 3.9% from the previous year. Internet connection charges <strong>in</strong>creased 33.2% from<br />

2002 to 2003. 575 However, <strong>in</strong> exchange transmission speeds allow for multi-media and bandwidth <strong>in</strong>tensive<br />

services.<br />

Figure 89 illustrates that <strong>in</strong> 2002 13.4% of the (dial-up and BB) Internet users spent more than one hour on the<br />

Internet. In 2003, the number of users which spend more than one hour on the Internet <strong>in</strong>creased to 15.2%.<br />

Given the overall strong <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> BB Internet users, Figure 8 shows that users <strong>in</strong>vest their valuable<br />

“resources” time and attention <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong> (BB) Internet. In addition, because transmission speeds are<br />

steadily <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the time is <strong>in</strong>vested more useful to the end user.<br />

Figure 89: Time spent on the Internet576<br />

Figure 90 shows where this time <strong>in</strong>vestment is com<strong>in</strong>g from: sleep<strong>in</strong>g, watch<strong>in</strong>g TV, and leisure activities.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this survey, there is, however, no big difference between BB and non-BB users <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction with other people. In particular, the survey <strong>in</strong>dicates that BB users even have more contact with<br />

family members and friends.<br />

Figure 90: BB Internet and Usage Patterns577<br />

573 MIC (2004), p. 31-35.<br />

574 MIC (2004), Section 2 of the White Paper gives valuable <strong>in</strong>formation on the change <strong>in</strong> Lifestyles result<strong>in</strong>g from Network use. p. 12-19.<br />

575 MIC (2004), p. 49.<br />

576 MIC (2004), p. 13.


Page 260 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

People only use BB services if they feel comfortable and secure with it. In this respect, Figure 91 shows the<br />

biggest concerns to <strong>in</strong>dividual end users. In particular, fraud and unscrupulous bus<strong>in</strong>ess methods (62.7%),<br />

improper use of personal <strong>in</strong>formation (59.7%), improper access to personal <strong>in</strong>formation (58.2%) and <strong>in</strong>fection of<br />

computer virus (37.5%) show that “security” is a serious issue and needs to be addressed. Complexity of<br />

services and devices is also a concern to almost 50% of <strong>in</strong>dividual users.<br />

Figure 91: Individual's Concerns relat<strong>in</strong>g to the use of Ubiquitous Network Services<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g companies, Figure 92 shows that the BB usage gap between small and large companies is gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

smaller and smaller. The percentage of corporate Internet usage (companies with more than 100 full-time<br />

employees) reached 97.5%. Currently, less than 10% of the companies are us<strong>in</strong>g BB for tele-work<strong>in</strong>g. However,<br />

of those companies 30.9% are report<strong>in</strong>g “excellent” and 66.1% some improvement.<br />

Figure 92: Use of BB by large and small companies578<br />

What are the benefits that Japanese companies lead to sign up for BB services? Figure 93 shows that the biggest<br />

benefits of BB is its <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the pace of the bus<strong>in</strong>ess (83.6%), reduces bus<strong>in</strong>ess costs (45.1%), and promotion<br />

of a paperless office (27.8%). 579<br />

577 MIC (2004), p. 14.<br />

578 MIC (2004), p. 21.<br />

579 MIC (2004) Section 3 conta<strong>in</strong>s useful empirical data on Japanese bus<strong>in</strong>esses and ubiqunetworks. p. 20-29


Page 261 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 93: Benefits From Use of Advanced ITC Network Environments <strong>in</strong> In-House and B-to-B Operations580<br />

In contrast to the benefits, Figure 13 shows the problems discourag<strong>in</strong>g the use of <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

communications Networks. In particular, difficulties relate to establish<strong>in</strong>g security measures (66.3%), concerns<br />

over viruses (62.9%) and employee awareness (43.4%). In addition, the graph shows what companies undertake<br />

to address the important issue of educat<strong>in</strong>g people <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g computers. 581<br />

580 MIC (2004), p. 21.<br />

581 MIC (2004), p. 48.<br />

Figure 94: Problems Discourag<strong>in</strong>g The Use of Information and Communication<br />

Networks/ Types of IT Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for Employees by Corporations.


8.29.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 262 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

2001 is <strong>in</strong> Japan considered the broadband kick-off year582 . Late <strong>in</strong> 2000, an 8 Mb ADSL service was <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

by Yahoo BB! at a rate of less than 15€ per month, and this created a boom <strong>in</strong> the demand for ADSL. 100 Mb<br />

optical fibre network access was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> March 2001 at rates below 25€ per month and 3G services were<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced later the same year. 2001 was also the year the e-Japan plan was announced, with the target to create<br />

the most advanced broadband network environment by 2005. In addition to <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> broadband networks,<br />

the programme also aimed to stimulate demand through facilitation of e-commerce and digitization of the public<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration. The budget allocated for the first phase of the programme was almost 1 bn. € <strong>in</strong> 2001 and more<br />

than 10 bill. € <strong>in</strong> 2002583 .<br />

The remedies used to facilitate development of broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructures <strong>in</strong>cluded:<br />

• Open<strong>in</strong>g of utility facilities such as poles, ducts and conduits<br />

• Facilitation of high-speed Internet access from apartment complexes<br />

• Open<strong>in</strong>g of unused optical fibres to private use<br />

• Usual regulatory measures such as unbundl<strong>in</strong>g, asymmetric regulation, frequency allocation, etc.<br />

The M<strong>in</strong>istry emphasised that the private sector had to be the driv<strong>in</strong>g force, with the government limited to<br />

establish<strong>in</strong>g the right framework for the private sector and to the non-private sectors (e-government, R&D and<br />

overcom<strong>in</strong>g the digital divide). 584 In spite of this, the central government, actually, supports roll-out of<br />

broadband facilities by offer<strong>in</strong>g attractive f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g schemes, tax <strong>in</strong>centives and guarantee of liabilities.<br />

Public policies aim<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease computer awareness are also undertaken by the Japanese Government. For<br />

<strong>in</strong>stance, almost all schools have been connected to the Internet. 56.8% of the schools are connected via high<br />

speed (400 kbs) and 29.2 % of all classrooms had LAN connections. 58% of the schools have their own website.<br />

Importantly, 87.6% of the teachers knew how to operate computers and 52.8% of teachers were able to use<br />

computers to conduct their classes. In addition to this, local governments engage <strong>in</strong> cooperative ventures <strong>in</strong><br />

order to offer broadband to its citizens. One example is <strong>in</strong> Hyogo, where the Awaji local council has<br />

commissioned an ISP provider to <strong>in</strong>stall ADSL <strong>in</strong> the town and provide access to it citizens at a monthly rate of<br />

16.5$ 585 .<br />

The success <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure roll-out has not yet been matched <strong>in</strong> content production. Hence, the cont<strong>in</strong>uation of<br />

e-Japan (U-Japan), which aims to provide ubiquitous access to broadband services, but with more focus on the<br />

development of applications than <strong>in</strong> the previous programme. While the contribution from the e-Japan<br />

programme to the broadband success is far from clear586 , the speed of the growth <strong>in</strong> penetration compared to<br />

other countries could <strong>in</strong>dicate a positive impact.<br />

8.29.4 Conclusion<br />

Japan has the most advanced BB <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> the world, and access pric<strong>in</strong>g is lowest <strong>in</strong> all OECD countries.<br />

The advanced state of the network also means that services can be bandwidth <strong>in</strong>tensive, which, <strong>in</strong> turn is<br />

attractive to end users. Those are certa<strong>in</strong>ly two factors which have an impact on demand and subscriber<br />

numbers.<br />

Another important factor relate to the end users themselves. Surveys show that Japanese <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly spend<br />

more time <strong>in</strong> front of the PC. Their prime concerns relate to security and improper use of and access to personal<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation. Companies voice similar security concerns and mention lack of skills as one of the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons as<br />

a deterrent to ICT usage.<br />

582<br />

Teruyasu Murakami: ‘Establish<strong>in</strong>g the Ubiquitous Network Environment <strong>in</strong> Japan’, NRI Papers no. 66, Nomura Research Institute, July<br />

2003.<br />

583<br />

Sab<strong>in</strong>e Ehlers: ‘IT policy <strong>in</strong> Japan – from hard to soft’, ITPC, Nov. 5 2003.<br />

584<br />

Commerce and Information Policy Bureau of M<strong>in</strong>istry of Economy, Trade and Industry: ‘Promotion of the IT Revolution and Electronic<br />

Government’.<br />

585<br />

ITU: ‘Promot<strong>in</strong>g Broadband: the Case of Japan’, Geneva, April 2003, pp. 32-33.<br />

586<br />

Teruyasu Murakami: Op. cit.


8.30 Non-EU country studies: South Korea<br />

8.30.1 Introduction<br />

Page 263 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Korea is geographically somewhat larger than Portugal or Hungary. It has a higher population density than all<br />

European countries except Malta, about the same as the Netherlands, twice as high as the U.K., and 25 times<br />

higher than Sweden. About 80 percent of its population lives <strong>in</strong> urban areas, about 70 percent <strong>in</strong> its seven largest<br />

cities, and almost 50 percent <strong>in</strong> large high-rise apartment complexes.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the early 1960s, when its GDP per capita at less than 100 $ per capita was comparable with the poorer<br />

countries of Africa and Asia, South Korea has achieved an <strong>in</strong>credible record of growth and <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>to the<br />

high-tech modern world economy. In nom<strong>in</strong>al terms, the GDP per capita for year 2004 was about 13,000 US$ 587 ,<br />

and purchas<strong>in</strong>g power adjusted GDP per capita about 19,200 US$, putt<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> the same low-middle <strong>in</strong>come<br />

group as e.g. Spa<strong>in</strong> and Hungary. 588 In 2004, agriculture represented about 3 percent of the GDP, <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

production about 40 percent and services about 56 percent. Adjusted for purchase power parity, the annual<br />

growth of GDP 5.9 percent over the 1980-2003 period. This success was achieved by a system of close<br />

government/bus<strong>in</strong>ess ties, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g directed credit, import restrictions, active promotion of specific <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

through five-year plans, which have systematically pushed the economy towards high-value added <strong>in</strong>dustries,<br />

and strong labour effort supported by cultural factors. Historically, the government has promoted the import of<br />

raw materials and technology at the expense of consumer goods and encouraged sav<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>vestment over<br />

consumption. The Korean economic system has been characterised by large and extremely diversified family<br />

conglomerates called chaebols. The “big five” chaebols are the Hyundai, Samsung, LG, Daewoo, and SK<br />

groups.<br />

The Asian f<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis of 1997-98 exposed some weaknesses <strong>in</strong> its development model. The problems<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded massive foreign borrow<strong>in</strong>g and an undiscipl<strong>in</strong>ed f<strong>in</strong>ancial sector; growth plunged to a negative 6.6% <strong>in</strong><br />

1998. South Korea, however, recovered quickly, helped by rapid growth <strong>in</strong> ICT exports, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

semiconductor memory chips, TFT-LCD displays, and mobile phones.<br />

In 2003 the National Assembly approved legislation reduc<strong>in</strong>g the six-day workweek to five days. The salary<br />

levels <strong>in</strong> the ICT <strong>in</strong>dustry were the third lowest <strong>in</strong> OECD countries, after Hungary and Czech Republic <strong>in</strong> 2002.<br />

Corrected for purchas<strong>in</strong>g power, however, the Korean ICT workers earned similar salaries than workers <strong>in</strong> the<br />

U.S., Japan, and Ireland. For eng<strong>in</strong>eers, the <strong>in</strong>come levels were relatively low when compared with global<br />

levels. In the large Korea cities the liv<strong>in</strong>g costs are high, with Seoul be<strong>in</strong>g as expensive a city to live <strong>in</strong> as San<br />

Francisco. Only a relatively small fraction of total labour force, about 6 percent, worked <strong>in</strong> ICT <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong><br />

2002. The discrepancy between the high percentage of ICT of total GDP and low percentage of labour force is<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that Korea focuses on high-value added and export-oriented ICT manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, where<br />

labour <strong>in</strong>puts are low.<br />

Korea ranks <strong>in</strong> the top four <strong>in</strong> science, mathematics, problem solv<strong>in</strong>g, and read<strong>in</strong>g skills among 15-year old<br />

students, putt<strong>in</strong>g it second after F<strong>in</strong>land among the OECD countries. 589 However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to IMD (2003) and<br />

WEF (2003) surveys, Korea’s mathematics and science education level is one of the lowest among OECD<br />

countries. In particular, Korea's education and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g level <strong>in</strong> IT is <strong>in</strong> the mid to low percentiles. The social<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> science and technology are below the OECD mean, and considerably lower than <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gapore, India,<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a, and F<strong>in</strong>land. On the other hand, South Korea has the largest share of eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g degree holders among<br />

total university graduates <strong>in</strong> the world. About 41 percent of degree holders with BAs, MAs and PhDs majored <strong>in</strong><br />

science and eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, compared to 29.2 <strong>in</strong> Japan and 18 percent <strong>in</strong> the U.S. 590 In addition, about 400,000<br />

Koreans studied abroad <strong>in</strong> 2004.<br />

The Korean educational culture is based on Confucian values where education is perceived as a ma<strong>in</strong> source of<br />

social advancement, and parents are held socially responsible for guarantee<strong>in</strong>g that their children succeed well at<br />

school. This means, <strong>in</strong> practice, that Korean children often study very long hours, frequently complement<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

basic school<strong>in</strong>g with various forms of private teach<strong>in</strong>g. Compar<strong>in</strong>g the educational achievements <strong>in</strong> the 15-year<br />

group between the two lead<strong>in</strong>g countries Korea and F<strong>in</strong>land shows, however, that F<strong>in</strong>nish students achieve the<br />

same or better results with considerably less hours of study.<br />

587<br />

The Korean won exchange rate was about 1,04 KRW per $ and 1,40 KRW per € on 3 January 2005. In mid-2005, the exchange rate is<br />

close to 1,01 won/$. For historical data, this report uses exchange rates of 1,30 and 1,20 per US$, depend<strong>in</strong>g of the year.<br />

588<br />

OECD 2005, Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Power Parities and Real Expenditures: 2002 Results.<br />

589<br />

OECD: Learn<strong>in</strong>g for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003. Available at http://www.pisa.oecd.org.<br />

590 th<br />

Park Chung-a: Korea ranked 34 for quality of life: KITA report shows Seoul World’s No. 1 IT Power. The Korea Times, 30 September<br />

2005.


Page 264 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Import substitution, <strong>in</strong>creased knowledge-<strong>in</strong>tensity, and cultural values that promote hard work and human<br />

capital development have been important factors <strong>in</strong> the development of the ICT sector <strong>in</strong> Korea. Foreign<br />

Investment Zones and <strong>in</strong>centives for research and development have also been important, mak<strong>in</strong>g, for example,<br />

Nokia and Philips major <strong>in</strong>vestors <strong>in</strong> Korea. Korean ICT exports have been grow<strong>in</strong>g rapidly dur<strong>in</strong>g recent years.<br />

In 2004, the ICT exports were a ma<strong>in</strong> source of growth <strong>in</strong> Korea and ICT exports were still expected to cont<strong>in</strong>ue<br />

strong, at an average rate of 17.8 percent dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2003-8 period. 591 Due to the rapid depreciation of the U.S.<br />

dollar, fast price decl<strong>in</strong>es, and the fact that Korean export prices strongly depend on the U.S. dollar, export<br />

growth <strong>in</strong> 2005 may, however, rema<strong>in</strong> close to zero.<br />

The U.S. has been the ma<strong>in</strong> customer of Korean ICT products, although Ch<strong>in</strong>a is rapidly becom<strong>in</strong>g the largest<br />

importer. This can be seen <strong>in</strong> Table 47, which shows the five largest import dest<strong>in</strong>ations of Korean ICT<br />

products.<br />

Rank 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

1 U.S. (29%) U.S. (28%) U.S. (29%) U.S. (31%) U.S. (27%) U.S.(20.4%)<br />

2 Japan (10%) Malaysia (8%) Japan (9%) Japan (10%) Japan (10%) Ch<strong>in</strong>a(15.6%)<br />

3 Malaysia (8%) Hong Kong (8%) Taiwan (8%) Hong Kong (7%) Hong Kong (8%) Hong Kong (11.2%)<br />

4 S<strong>in</strong>gapore (8%) Japan (7%) Hong Kong (7%) S<strong>in</strong>gapore (7%) Ch<strong>in</strong>a (7%) Japan(8.5%)<br />

5 Hong Kong (7%) Taiwan (7%) S<strong>in</strong>gapore (7%) Taiwan (7%) Taiwan (7%) Taiwan(5.7%)<br />

Total 62% 58% 60% 61% 59% 61%<br />

Table 47: Top five export dest<strong>in</strong>ations of Korean ICT products (source: KISDI)<br />

The legal system <strong>in</strong> South Korea comb<strong>in</strong>es elements of cont<strong>in</strong>ental European civil law systems, Anglo-American<br />

law, and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese classical thought. South Korea ranks 47 th <strong>in</strong> the 2004 Corruption Perceptions Index produced<br />

by Transparency International, worse than Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, but before Greece and Czech Republic.<br />

8.30.2 The broadband market<br />

The Republic of Korea, also known as South Korea, has s<strong>in</strong>ce the year 2000 been the global leader <strong>in</strong> broadband<br />

use. Korean broadband connections have on average 4 megabits per second, and 50 megabits per second<br />

connections are widely available. Most European broadband connections would not be counted as broadband<br />

connections <strong>in</strong> Korea, where the official def<strong>in</strong>ition for high-speed Internet connection requires more than 1<br />

Mbps connections. South Korea has now more WiFi hot spots than the U.S. Three licenses for the new mobile<br />

Internet, WiBro, were granted <strong>in</strong> January 2005, although, one of the licensees, Hanaro Telecom, gave up its<br />

WiBro license <strong>in</strong> April 2005, just before it was to pay its first license fee.<br />

Korea had about 12 million broadband subscribers <strong>in</strong> March 2005. It had about 10 percent of the global xDSL<br />

subscriptions, the second largest subscriber count after Ch<strong>in</strong>a. In December 2004, Korea had 31.58 million<br />

people who had used the Internet dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous month, or 70 percent of the over-6 year population 592 593 .<br />

Yet, on the World Economic Forum’s Network Read<strong>in</strong>ess Index, it ranked only 24 th , just after United Arab<br />

Emirates and before Estonia.<br />

8.30.2.1 ICT production<br />

The diffusion of broadband <strong>in</strong> Korea is closely related to Information Society policies that have actively<br />

promoted the ICT <strong>in</strong>dustry. Korean policymakers have used the domestic market to improve the global<br />

competitiveness of the <strong>in</strong>dustry, as part of their development policies, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g export-led <strong>in</strong>dustrial policy<br />

with policies for local capability development. Korean manufacturers are now the lead<strong>in</strong>g producers <strong>in</strong> DRAM<br />

and flash memories. Korean LCD displays account for about 45 percent of global market. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to recent<br />

591<br />

KISDI 2004: IT Industry Outlook of Korea 2004.<br />

592<br />

Survey on the Computer and Internet Usage. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information and Communication, National Internet Development Agency of<br />

Korea, February 2005.<br />

593<br />

The number is somewhat smaller if the OECD def<strong>in</strong>ition of broadband penetration is used. S<strong>in</strong>ce December 2004, the Korean Internet<br />

statistics count as Internet users also mobile phone users who access Internet only through their phones (about 280,000 persons).


Page 265 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

market estimates, Korean plasma display panel (PDP) manufacturers produced about 50 percent of the world<br />

output <strong>in</strong> 2004. Korean firms also dom<strong>in</strong>ated the organic light-emitt<strong>in</strong>g diodes (OLED) display market, with<br />

Samsung SDI hav<strong>in</strong>g a 40 percent global market share. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1996, Korea has been the lead<strong>in</strong>g manufacturer of<br />

cathode-ray tubes, now with about 57 percent global market share. 594<br />

Korean firms are also lead<strong>in</strong>g producers <strong>in</strong> broadband subscriber equipment and have rapidly ga<strong>in</strong>ed market<br />

share <strong>in</strong> mobile phones. Domestic production of IT equipment grew between 1999 and 2003 from US$ 70<br />

billion to US$ 120 billion. The software market has <strong>in</strong>creased annually 31.4 percent over the 1998 to 2003<br />

period, to 15.4 billion US$. Software exports grew at an average annual rate of 41.9 percent, from US$ 52<br />

million to US$ 304 million <strong>in</strong> the same period, but stagnated <strong>in</strong> 2003. Computer service markets grew at an<br />

average annual rate of 28.1 percent, and the digital contents production at 46.4 percent annual rate <strong>in</strong> the 1998-<br />

2003 period. 595<br />

The most rapid growth was <strong>in</strong> communications equipment, where the compound average annual growth rate was<br />

32.3 percent over the 1996 to 2002 period. Korea is now <strong>in</strong> this area about twice as large an exporter than Japan<br />

and probably reach<strong>in</strong>g the size of Germany. In electronic components, Korea exported 20.4 bn US$ <strong>in</strong> 2002,<br />

compared to Germany’s 14.7 bn, U.K.’s 12.0 US$ bn and Japan’s 39.9 bn. 596 Korea had the second largest ICT<br />

goods export/import ratio <strong>in</strong> 2002; at the same level as Japan (1.7), after F<strong>in</strong>land (1.9), and higher than Ireland<br />

(1.5). As of 2003, mobile handsets accounted for 67.3% of all communications equipment exports, and the<br />

figure is expected to rise to 79% by 2008. The production of communications equipment is expected to rise at an<br />

average annual rate of 16.7 percent and exports by 23.5 percent through 2008. 597<br />

percent of total trade<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Ireland<br />

Korea<br />

Japan<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

Figure 95: Trade of ICT goods as a share of total trade, 1996-2002 (data from OECD).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce year 2000, Korea has been the country with the highest rate of broadband access <strong>in</strong> the world. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to OECD, Korea’s broadband access rate at the end of year 2004 was 24.9 per 100 persons, ahead of the runnerup<br />

Netherlands’s 19 per 100. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information and Communication, <strong>in</strong> March 2005<br />

there were about 12 million broadband Internet subscribers <strong>in</strong> total. In December 2004, 72.2 percent of Korean<br />

households had a wired Internet access at home. Males are more frequent users, at 76 percent of over-6 year<br />

population. 65 percent of females use the Internet, or 46 percent of all Internet users. The female usage rate,<br />

however, has been grow<strong>in</strong>g faster than male usage rate. The highest usage rate was <strong>in</strong> the 6-19 year age group<br />

with 96.2 percent, but the fastest growth was <strong>in</strong> the age group of people <strong>in</strong> their 40’s and 50’s. Almost all<br />

students used the Internet (98.1 percent) and the next highest usage rates were <strong>in</strong> the professionals/managers<br />

594 Digital Chosun 2004: Korea oversteps Japan’s lead <strong>in</strong> display panels market. 8 December 2004.<br />

595 NCA 2004, Broadband IT Korea Informatization White Paper.<br />

596 OECD 2004, Information Technology Outlook 2004.<br />

597 KISDI 2004: IT Industry Outlook of Korea 2004.


Page 266 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

demographic group (95.5 percent). The highest annual <strong>in</strong>crease was seen <strong>in</strong> the sales and services workers<br />

group, where the usage <strong>in</strong>creased 14.2 percent to 65.8 percent between December 2003 and December 2004.<br />

Internet users (millions)<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Dec-<br />

94<br />

8.30.2.2 Pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Dec-<br />

95<br />

Internet Users<br />

Internet Penetration Rate<br />

Dec-<br />

96<br />

Dec-<br />

97<br />

Dec-<br />

98<br />

Oct-<br />

99<br />

Mar-<br />

00<br />

Aug-<br />

00<br />

Dec-<br />

00<br />

Mar-<br />

01<br />

Figure 96: Internet users <strong>in</strong> Korea (source: KRNIC and NIDA).<br />

Broadband access prices have been low s<strong>in</strong>ce their launch <strong>in</strong> 1998, typically around 25-30 US$ <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

modem rental. The low subscriber prices reflect ma<strong>in</strong>ly heavy competition. Broadband service providers<br />

competed by <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their own facilities and generated large losses dur<strong>in</strong>g the first years, hop<strong>in</strong>g that larger<br />

market shares and customer bases would later allow them to become profitable. The low subscriber prices of<br />

Korea also reflect some government pressure to promote rapid diffusion of broadband. Although prices have not<br />

been regulated, the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Communications and Information has <strong>in</strong>dicated to the operators that it would be<br />

good if the prices would be low. When facilities-based compet<strong>in</strong>g service providers entered the Internet access<br />

market, their low flat-fee pric<strong>in</strong>g rapidly attracted exist<strong>in</strong>g dial-up Internet customers. Given the level of average<br />

<strong>in</strong>come, the subscription prices, however, have been higher than the EU average. Koreans apparently have been<br />

will<strong>in</strong>g to pay more for their broadband services than most Europeans.<br />

0.00%<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

Belgium<br />

Germany<br />

Denmark<br />

Sw eden<br />

Austria<br />

Netherlands<br />

France<br />

Luxembourg<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Ireland<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00%<br />

Lithuania<br />

Portugal<br />

Italy<br />

Cyprus<br />

Malta<br />

Estonia<br />

Croatia<br />

Slovenia<br />

Hungary<br />

Poland<br />

Japan<br />

Korea (Rep.)<br />

median EU: 3.5 %<br />

Figure 97: Broadband subscription cost as percentage of average monthly <strong>in</strong>come, 2003 (data from OECD).<br />

Jun-<br />

01<br />

Sep-<br />

01<br />

Dec-<br />

01<br />

Jun-<br />

02<br />

Dec-<br />

02<br />

Jun-<br />

03<br />

Dec-<br />

03<br />

Jun-<br />

04<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Internet penetration rate


Page 267 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The picture, however, changes radically when the connection speed is taken <strong>in</strong>to account. The average<br />

connection speed <strong>in</strong> Korea is now 4 megabits per second, and the subscription to 20-40 megabit per second<br />

service costs about 50 US$ per month. In comparison with EU countries, Koreans have often ten times higher<br />

bit rate per €.<br />

Poland<br />

Estonia<br />

Hungary<br />

Croatia<br />

Lithuania<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Malta<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Cyprus<br />

Portugal<br />

Denmark<br />

Ireland<br />

Luxembo<br />

France<br />

Slovenia<br />

Sweden<br />

Italy<br />

Austria<br />

United<br />

Germany<br />

Netherla<br />

Belgium<br />

Korea<br />

Japan<br />

0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50%<br />

Figure 98: Broadband subscription cost per 100 bit per second, as percentage of<br />

monthly <strong>in</strong>come, 2003 (data from OECD).<br />

The drop of the US dollar has <strong>in</strong>creased the prices when measured <strong>in</strong> dollar terms, to above 32 US$ monthly<br />

fees <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g equipment rental. In January 2005, KT xDSL/BWLL service was about 25 €, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g term<strong>in</strong>al<br />

rental and taxes, LAN access about 23 €, and satellite about 26 € per month. For customers that were will<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

wait 15 days for the <strong>in</strong>stallation, the one-time <strong>in</strong>stallation fee of about 21 € was waived. Satellite service<br />

subscribers had to pay for the <strong>in</strong>stallation of their equipment separately. Thrunet’s broadband cable modem<br />

service was about 33 €, and a low-speed 1-1.5 Mbps connection was available for 25 €, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g equipment<br />

rental and taxes. Thrunet also provided ADSL connections to customers it could not reach us<strong>in</strong>g its cable<br />

network, at about 25 € per month. In addition, Thrunet had a reduced cost service for customers who were<br />

will<strong>in</strong>g to receive advertisements.<br />

8.30.2.3 Supply<br />

The <strong>in</strong>cumbent operator Korea Telecom (KT) was established <strong>in</strong> December 1981, and the government has<br />

gradually reduced its ownership <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> KT s<strong>in</strong>ce 1993. Upon the repeal of the Korea Telecom Act as of<br />

October 1, 1997, KT became a partially government-owned company regulated by the Korean Commercial<br />

Code and changed its name from Korea Telecom to Korea Telecom Corporation (and later KT corporation). The<br />

government sold its last shares <strong>in</strong> KT <strong>in</strong> 2002.<br />

In its <strong>in</strong>itial stage, KT focused on supply<strong>in</strong>g telephone facilities to the general public. The company expanded<br />

from about 4.5 million telephone l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> 1982 to about 20 million l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> 1993, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g Korea’s household<br />

telephone penetration from 21% to 90%. This created a strong domestic demand for telecom equipment. In the<br />

early 1990s Korea was still catch<strong>in</strong>g up the lead<strong>in</strong>g countries, with 38 telephone l<strong>in</strong>es per 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong><br />

1993, compared to Japan’s and the UK’s 47, Germany’s 46, and France’s and the US’ 53. Mobile phone<br />

penetration was about one percent, less than a quarter of the US mobile phone penetration of 4.4 per hundred<br />

<strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>in</strong> that same year. 598<br />

598 Jeong, K-H. & J.L.K<strong>in</strong>g (1997): Korea’s National Information Infrastructure: Vision and Issues. In B. Kah<strong>in</strong> & E. Wilson (eds.) National<br />

Information Infrastructure Initiatives: Vision and Policy Design. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, p. 122.


Page 268 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Partly because of pressure from the US, Korea started to liberalise its telecom sector dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1990s. It signed<br />

the WTO agreement on basic telecommunication services that became effective <strong>in</strong> November 1997, which<br />

committed the country to liberalis<strong>in</strong>g its telecommunication sector. The dial-up Internet service market had been<br />

opened through negotiations with the US already <strong>in</strong> 1989, and the 1994 Uruguay Round had eased regulations<br />

for entry and pric<strong>in</strong>g conditions from registration to notification and abolished foreign ownership limitations on<br />

domestic value-added service providers. 599<br />

Korea first opened <strong>in</strong>ternational long distance service, with the entry of Dacom <strong>in</strong> December 1991. When the<br />

data communication market was opened for value added network services <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s, Dacom was<br />

allowed to enter the voice market and to start to compete with KT. In January 1996, the domestic long distance<br />

service became a duopoly when Dacom entered the market. The last monopoly market, local telecom services,<br />

opened for competition <strong>in</strong> April 1999 with the entry of Hanaro. In 2001, local telephone services were provided<br />

by 33 facility-based carriers, value added telecommunications services by 4,890 carriers, and special<br />

telecommunications services by over 78 carriers. Foreign <strong>in</strong>vestment had largely been liberalised.<br />

Although KT has given some of its market to its competitors, it is still the dom<strong>in</strong>ant service provider <strong>in</strong> fixedl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

communication networks. The KT market share <strong>in</strong> year 2001 <strong>in</strong> the different market segments can be seen <strong>in</strong><br />

Table 48.<br />

Service<br />

Year competition<br />

was <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

KT’s market share, 2001<br />

Local service 1999 96.9 %<br />

Domestic long distance 1996 85.5 %<br />

International long distance 1991 67.1 %<br />

Table 48: Telecom liberalisation <strong>in</strong> Korea (source: ITU 600 ).<br />

The M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information and Communication (MIC) and other government entities have extensive authority<br />

to regulate KT. The MIC has responsibility for approv<strong>in</strong>g rates for local service and <strong>in</strong>terconnection services<br />

provided by KT. From January 1998 KT was allowed to set its own rates for domestic long-distance service,<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational long-distance service and other services without approval from the MIC.<br />

The entry of Hanaro became a critical turn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the development of broadband <strong>in</strong> Korea. Hanaro was<br />

created <strong>in</strong> June 1997, when MIC licensed a second local telephone operator. With government encouragement,<br />

Korea’s chaebols, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g LG Group and SK Group, jo<strong>in</strong>tly formed Hanaro and provided it with strong<br />

economic back<strong>in</strong>g. Hanaro was orig<strong>in</strong>ally supposed to <strong>in</strong>crease competition <strong>in</strong> the local phone services. Its<br />

launch, however, occurred exactly at the time of the Asian currency crisis, when the Korean economy contracted<br />

rapidly. It also became clear that Hanaro would have a very difficult time <strong>in</strong> compet<strong>in</strong>g with KT, as there was no<br />

number portability and KT was able to charge large reconnection costs from customers who switched to Hanaro<br />

and who subsequently wanted to switch back to KT. Realis<strong>in</strong>g its difficult position, Hanaro decided to focus on<br />

the provision of Internet connection.<br />

Hanaro focused on ADSL, for which it orig<strong>in</strong>ally purchased equipment from Alcatel. The idea was to lay out<br />

fibre to access large apartment blocks and then use ADSL with<strong>in</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>g to provide broadband service for<br />

the end customers. The strategy also relied on the expected rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e of ASDL equipment costs. 601 Hanaro<br />

also collaborated with the cable network operator Powercomm 602 to provide cable modem broadband access to<br />

those households that it could not economically reach us<strong>in</strong>g its own network. Powercomm was eager to sell<br />

access to its hybrid fibre cable network, as it was legally barred from engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> retail services, with its<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess operations limited to wholesales to fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e telecom providers and regional cable television operators.<br />

To <strong>in</strong>crease the coverage of its services, Hanaro also used unbundled local copper network from KT.<br />

599<br />

Lee, Nae-Chan, Broadband Internet Service: Korea’s Experience. KISDI, February 2002.<br />

600<br />

Kelly, T., V. Gray & M. M<strong>in</strong>ges (2003) Broadband Korea: Internet Case Study. ITU, 2003, p.5.<br />

601<br />

The purchas<strong>in</strong>g price of ADSL modems fell from about 600 US$ <strong>in</strong> 1999 to less than 100 US$ <strong>in</strong> 2002. For cost breakdown, see footnote<br />

621.<br />

602<br />

In 2002, Powercomm, established <strong>in</strong> January 2000, had 75,170 km of fibre-optic cable l<strong>in</strong>es across the nation and other <strong>in</strong>tercity<br />

networks. Its clients <strong>in</strong>cluded LG Telecom, Thrunet, Hanaro, SK Telecom and Dacom. It was owned ma<strong>in</strong>ly by Korea Electric Power<br />

Corporation. After privatisation and Hanro’s unsuccessful attempt buy it, Powercomm became part of the LG Group <strong>in</strong> February 2003.<br />

Powercomm now has 95,000 km of optical backbone cable and a 57,000 km hybrid fibre-cable (HFC) network.


Page 269 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Hanaro was able to roll out broadband services extremely rapidly partly because the Korean construction<br />

regulations require that large apartment build<strong>in</strong>gs have a central telecommunications room. In Korea, the wir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>gs is owned and controlled by the build<strong>in</strong>g owners. In this sense, Korea has no “local-loop<br />

bottleneck,” and regulators have not had to create complex rules for access<strong>in</strong>g the local loop. After gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

access to the local decision-maker who controlled the build<strong>in</strong>g’s telecommunications room, it was a relatively<br />

easy task for Hanaro to drop fibre to the room and provide services for all the households <strong>in</strong> the build<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Hanaro first focused on large apartment complexes, with more than 300 households, and later targeted smaller<br />

complexes with 200 households.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>cumbent KT was a late bloomer <strong>in</strong> the high-speed Internet market, which was opened by the cable<br />

network operator Thrunet <strong>in</strong> July 1998. KT had a slow start partly because it believed that future broadband<br />

services would be based on ISDN accord<strong>in</strong>g to earlier national Information Society visions. KT was, for<br />

example, heavily <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the government Broadband Integrated Services Digital Network (BISDN) project<br />

that was orig<strong>in</strong>ally planned to run from 1992 to 2015. It had also launched pilot tests with ADSL <strong>in</strong> 1997 and<br />

decided that, due to the high equipment costs, ADSL could not be a viable broadband technology. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

KT’s calculations, it needed at least half a million subscribers who would pay 50 to 60 US$ per month to break<br />

even. 603 When KT realised that Hanaro and Thrunet were about to carve a slice of the emerg<strong>in</strong>g broadband<br />

market, it reacted however rapidly. It was ranked first <strong>in</strong> the domestic <strong>in</strong>dustry already <strong>in</strong> June 2000, a year after<br />

launch<strong>in</strong>g its commercial services. Its high-speed Internet service subscribers exceeded 4 million <strong>in</strong> March 2002<br />

and 5 million <strong>in</strong> December 2002, mak<strong>in</strong>g KT the largest broadband access provider <strong>in</strong> the world.<br />

Millions<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

KT Hanaro Telecom Thrunet Onse Telecom Dacom Dreaml<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Figure 99: Broadband service providers by subscribers, July 2004 (source: MIC).<br />

In short, the Korean broadband and telecommunications market has been characterised by fierce competition<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce the end of the 1990s. This has also meant that service providers have had difficulties <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g profit. For<br />

example, <strong>in</strong> 2001, only KT and one of the mobile operators made profit. Hanaro, the second largest broadband<br />

provider, has never made a net profit. To some extent this was because it <strong>in</strong>vested very heavily <strong>in</strong> new facilities<br />

until the year 2000, <strong>in</strong> an attempt to ga<strong>in</strong> market share. After that it has rapidly decreased its annual capital<br />

expenditures, which <strong>in</strong> 2003 were less than one-fifth of the expenditure <strong>in</strong> year 2000. After heavy cost-cutt<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Hanaro was able to post nom<strong>in</strong>al operat<strong>in</strong>g profit <strong>in</strong> 2002 and 2003, although its profit after capital depreciation<br />

and <strong>in</strong>terests rema<strong>in</strong>ed strongly negative. Thrunet, the third largest service provider, has never been able to make<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g profit. Thrunet sought court protection <strong>in</strong> March 2003 and was bought by Hanaro <strong>in</strong> an auction <strong>in</strong><br />

December 2004 for perhaps up to 430 US$ per Thrunet customer, a price that analysts have claimed to be<br />

difficult to justify simply by revenue generation.<br />

The economic difficulties of broadband access providers have also led to other changes <strong>in</strong> ownership. Hanaro is<br />

now controlled by a consortium led by American International Group and Newbridge Capital, which <strong>in</strong>vested<br />

about 1.1 billion US$ <strong>in</strong> the company <strong>in</strong> November 2003. Analysts see a possible merger of Hanaro and the<br />

603 DTI Overseas mission to South Korea. Brunel University, 2002, p.16.


Page 270 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g mobile operator SK Telecom loom<strong>in</strong>g on the horizon. Dacom, <strong>in</strong> turn, is now part of the LG Group,<br />

which also controls Powercomm. The telecom units of LG, the second largest chaebol <strong>in</strong> Korea, are currently<br />

struggl<strong>in</strong>g along, with Dacom’s sales stagnant for the last five years, and Korea’s smallest mobile operator LG<br />

Telecom carry<strong>in</strong>g a debt-equity ratio of 300 percent at the end of 2004 and most probably mak<strong>in</strong>g considerable<br />

losses when mobile number portability will be fully established <strong>in</strong> 2005. Analysts therefore expect mergers and<br />

acquisitions.<br />

xDSL Cable LAN Satellite Total<br />

Market<br />

Share<br />

KT 5,230,342 - 353,880 4,836 5,589,058 50.0%<br />

Hanaro Telecom 1,093,261 1,290,150 342,152 - 2,725,563 24.4%<br />

Thrunet - 1,287,502 5,862 - 1,293,364 11.6%<br />

Onse Telecom - 419,293 3,769 - 423,062 3.8%<br />

Dreaml<strong>in</strong>e 56,178 89,546 3,874 - 149,598 1.3%<br />

Dacom - 135,884 65,820 - 201,704 1.8%<br />

Value-added<br />

3,362 605,791 9,950 - 619,103 5.5%<br />

operators<br />

Resellers 52,812 - 124,235 - 177,047 1.6%<br />

Total 6,435,955 3,828,166 909,542 4,836 11,178,499 100%<br />

Market Share 57.6% 34.2% 8.1% 0.1% 100% -<br />

Table 49: Broadband subscribers by service provider and access technology <strong>in</strong> Korea, Dec. 2003 (source MIC).<br />

Korean broadband analysts have suggested that Thrunet’s subscriber numbers may have been about 30 percent<br />

<strong>in</strong>flated before the auction <strong>in</strong> December 2004, and that the subscriber numbers could be closer to 1 million <strong>in</strong> the<br />

end of 2004. Thrunet, on the other hand, has claimed that it has not <strong>in</strong>cluded non-pay<strong>in</strong>g subscribers <strong>in</strong> its<br />

subscriber numbers. KT was estimated to have about 6 million subscribers and Hanaro about 2.8 million<br />

subscribers <strong>in</strong> December 2004.<br />

8.30.2.4 Demand<br />

In December 2004, Korea had 31.58 million people who had used the Internet dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous month, or 70<br />

percent of the over-6 year population. In June 2004, computer users averaged 14.6 hours per week for us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

computer and more than half of the users spent more than 10 hours us<strong>in</strong>g computer. 604 The most popular use was<br />

to access the Internet (82 percent), followed by games (41.5 percent) and <strong>in</strong>formation and data management (30<br />

percent). The most common motives for us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet were “curiosity/fun” (31.5 percent), followed by<br />

“work” (15.7 percent), “homework” (14.4 percent), and “search<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>formation” (13.2 percent).<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Figure 100: Reasons for us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet, December 2004 (source: NIDA).<br />

604<br />

Survey on the Computer and Internet Usage. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information and Communication, National Internet Development Agency of<br />

Korea, September 2004.


Page 271 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Electronic commerce and purchas<strong>in</strong>g are widely spread. B2B commerce grew 32.8% from 2002 to 2003,<br />

reach<strong>in</strong>g 170 bn US$, and there were 260 B2B e-market sites <strong>in</strong> 2003. Consumer Internet purchas<strong>in</strong>g grew 17%<br />

from 2002 to 2003, reach<strong>in</strong>g 5.8 bn US$. 605 Over 45 percent of Internet users aged 12 years and older had<br />

experience of Internet shopp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> June 2004, and 19 percent have paid for Internet content. 606<br />

Korean Internet users are already quite experienced, with average Internet experience of almost four and half<br />

years. They access the Internet most often from home (90%), followed by office (30%), public PC rooms (22%)<br />

and school (16%). The gender and age distribution of Internet users is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 50.<br />

Age group total male female Gap(%)<br />

Total 68.2 74.4 62.0 12.4<br />

6-19 95.5 95.6 95.4 0.2<br />

20’s 95.0 96.2 93.7 2.5<br />

30’s 86.4 89.8 82.9 6.9<br />

40’s 58.3 67.6 48.6 19.0<br />

50’s 27.6 39.0 16.2 22.8<br />

60 and older 7.3 12.2 3.8 8.4<br />

Table 50: Gender gap and Internet users <strong>in</strong> different age groups, June 2004 (source NDIA).<br />

8.30.2.5 Technologies and <strong>in</strong>frastructures<br />

The most popular access mode was xDSL, with 86 percent of households us<strong>in</strong>g it, followed by cable modems<br />

(13.5 percent), dial-up (4.2 percent) and ISDN (1.5 percent). 607 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the NIDA June survey, the most<br />

common access technology <strong>in</strong> Korea is xDSL, with 84 percent of Korean households us<strong>in</strong>g it to access the<br />

Internet, followed by cable modems at 11.6 percent. Service provider statistics give higher rates for cable, close<br />

to 33 percent of all broadband subscribers at the end of 2003. 608 The detailed subscriber numbers by technology<br />

at the end of 2003 can be seen <strong>in</strong> Table 51. 609<br />

Leased<br />

L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

CATV xDSL ISDN Dial-Up<br />

P<br />

C<br />

L<br />

BWLL/<br />

WLL<br />

Satellite<br />

Internet<br />

Metro-<br />

Ethernet<br />

Wireless-<br />

LAN<br />

85,958 4,023,488 6,877,118 77,095 259,058 - 2,462 5,915 2,320 145,233<br />

Table 51: Internet subscribers, Dec. 2003 (source: KRNIC).<br />

The cable operator Thrunet provided the first broadband service <strong>in</strong> Korea <strong>in</strong> July 1998. Initially, the number of<br />

residential cable modem subscribers exceeded ADSL subscribers, with the latter tak<strong>in</strong>g over <strong>in</strong> 2000. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />

reason for this was Hanaro’s successful use of ADSL to provide services to large apartment complexes. Hanaro<br />

also has provided cable access, and at present it has about 1.5 million cable modem broadband subscribers and<br />

about 1 million ADSL subscribers. 610 In the early phases of broadband rollout <strong>in</strong> Korea, KT also used LAN<br />

605 NCA, 2004 Broadband IT Korea: Informatization White Paper, p. 32.<br />

606 NIDA survey, referenced <strong>in</strong> footnote 604.<br />

607 Survey on the Computer and Internet Usage. M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information and Communication, National Internet Development Agency of<br />

Korea (NIDA), February 2005.<br />

608 The reason for this discrepancy is at present unknown.<br />

609 The KRNIC numbers for December 2003 are systematically higher than the numbers reported by MIC. The reason for this discrepancy is<br />

at present unknown.<br />

610 In December 2004, Hanaro reported 961,513 residential ADSL subscribers and 1,438,649 residential cable modem subscribers. At the<br />

same time, it had 18,363 corporate ADSL subscribers and 1,143 corporate cable modem subscribers. In addition, Hanaro had 272,900<br />

VDSL, 20,187 broadband WLL, and 36,179 Wireless LAN subscribers. Cable modem subscribers were, therefore, 52 percent of the<br />

total.


Page 272 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Ethernet to address the shortage of ADSL equipment and to respond to Hanaro’s competition. The rapid growth<br />

of both ADSL and cable modem subscribers can be seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 101. The figure also shows that the growth<br />

rates are now slow<strong>in</strong>g down.<br />

Millions<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

xDSL<br />

CATV<br />

Wireless-LAN<br />

Leased L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

ISDN<br />

BWLL/WLL<br />

Satellite Internet<br />

Metro-Ethernet<br />

1997.3<br />

1997.6<br />

1997.9<br />

1997.12<br />

1998.3<br />

1998.6<br />

1998.9<br />

1998.12<br />

1999.3<br />

1999.6<br />

1999.9<br />

1999.12<br />

2000.3<br />

2000.6<br />

2000.9<br />

2000.12<br />

2001.3<br />

2001.6<br />

2001.9<br />

2001.12<br />

2002.3<br />

2002.6<br />

2002.9<br />

2002.12<br />

2003.3<br />

2003.6<br />

2003.9<br />

2003.12<br />

Figure 101: Internet subscribers <strong>in</strong> Korea, 1996-2003 (source: KRNIC).<br />

Although the subscriber growth is slow<strong>in</strong>g down, the speed of connections cont<strong>in</strong>ues to grow. Hanaro launched<br />

the first commercial VDSL service <strong>in</strong> 2002, with 20 Mbps downstream and 6 Mbps upstream. In February 2003,<br />

KT launched a trial VDSL service at 50 Mbps.<br />

The competition to deploy Korean mobile Internet, called WiBro, began <strong>in</strong> November 2004, as Hanaro Telecom,<br />

KT and the largest mobile operator SK Telecom applied for the three bus<strong>in</strong>ess licenses. The licenses were<br />

granted <strong>in</strong> January 2005, and the commercial service is expected to be launched <strong>in</strong> April 2006. The fees for the<br />

seven-year licenses were expected to be set somewhere between 117 bn won to 128.5 bn won depend<strong>in</strong>g on the<br />

specific schemes presented to the government. In March 2005, KT and SK Telecom each paid US$ 116.5<br />

million license fees, but Hanaro pulled out.<br />

WiBro (Wireless Broadband), formerly known as 2.3GHz portable Internet, is part of the IEEE 802.16 family of<br />

wireless Internet specifications. In tests, WiBro has provided up to 3 Mbps connection to devices travell<strong>in</strong>g at up<br />

to 60 kilometres per hour. Theoretical downstream speed is 18 Mbps and upstream 6 Mbps. WiBro is related to<br />

but different from the WiMax system that has been developed to send a higher-bandwidth signal of several tens<br />

of megabits per second to fixed receivers over a distance of several tens of kilometres. The Korean portable<br />

Internet was orig<strong>in</strong>ally to be based on a national standard, but is now based on technologies that are planned to<br />

be compatible with <strong>in</strong>ternational standards. In November 2004, after negotiations with LG Electronics, Intel<br />

announced that it will secure compatibility with WiMAX and WiBro to avoid global market fragmentation.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Korea Information Strategy Development Institute (KISDI), the WiBro service is forecast to<br />

attract as many as 9.3 million subscribers by 2011. Analysts estimate that WiBro services via cell phones are<br />

unlikely to be possible <strong>in</strong> 2006 but at least SK Telecom has announced that it will have dual-band CDMA 2000<br />

1x and WiBro handsets available at the time of the commercial launch. Though voice service is technically<br />

possible us<strong>in</strong>g WiBro, the carriers have stated that they will provide only data services.<br />

As was noted above, the plans for develop<strong>in</strong>g broadband are closely connected with <strong>in</strong>dustrial policy <strong>in</strong> Korea.<br />

The rollout of services and <strong>in</strong>frastructures are l<strong>in</strong>ked with products and technologies where Korea sees potential<br />

for rapid growth and opportunity for global competitiveness. A central piece <strong>in</strong> the current Korean Information<br />

Society Strategy is the broadband convergent network (BcN), which will be used for video, data, and voice, and


Page 273 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

which will seamlessly comb<strong>in</strong>e wired and wireless access. 611 The expected schedule and subscriber numbers for<br />

BcN are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 52. Early applications will <strong>in</strong>clude high-quality voice-over-IP and video-telephony. The<br />

network is also expected to support <strong>in</strong>teractive digital media broadcast<strong>in</strong>g (DMB) for portable devices and, <strong>in</strong> its<br />

f<strong>in</strong>al stage, full broadband multimedia with guaranteed service quality.<br />

Example services<br />

Wired<br />

subscribers<br />

Wireless<br />

subscribers<br />

Total (millions)<br />

Early phase<br />

2004-'05<br />

Build<strong>in</strong>g phase<br />

'06-'07<br />

Completion phase<br />

'08-2010<br />

Convergence videophone; Portable Internet; HD multimedia with<br />

High-quality VoIP Interactive DMB<br />

QoS<br />

50~100Mbps 1.2 3.5 6<br />

100Mbps 0.3 1 4<br />

Subtotal 1.5 4.5 10<br />

50Mbps 0.5 3.5 9.5<br />

100Mbps - - 0.5<br />

Subtotal 0.5 3.5 10<br />

2 8 20<br />

Table 52: Plan for BcN schedule and subcriber numbers.<br />

DMB has recently had high visibility <strong>in</strong> the Korean Information Society policy. TU Media, the affiliate of the<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g mobile operator SK Telecom, launched free DMB pilot services <strong>in</strong> January 2005. The commercial<br />

launch was <strong>in</strong> May. DMB enables people to receive video, high-quality audio and data through handheld devices<br />

like handsets or <strong>in</strong>-car term<strong>in</strong>als. Video channels will feature news (YTN), music (M-Net of CJ Media), drama<br />

(SBS and MBC), sports, and games while audio channels <strong>in</strong>clude various k<strong>in</strong>ds of music programs, English and<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese conversation, and audio books. TU Media is plann<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease the number of channels from 20 to<br />

about 40, also add<strong>in</strong>g data broadcasts from next year. The satellite-based DMB now also <strong>in</strong>cludes a disaster<br />

warn<strong>in</strong>g system, which will be used to broadcast <strong>in</strong>formation both to subscribers and non-subscribers. The<br />

subscription price is 20,000 won (15 € or 20 US$) and the monthly subscription fee 13,000 won (9.6 € or 13<br />

US$). TU Media has waived the subscription fee and the monthly fee dur<strong>in</strong>g the first month of the launch. There<br />

are now about 10 different DMB receiver models available for the consumers, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g phones from Samsung<br />

and LG Electronics. In December 2004, World Digital Audio Broadcast<strong>in</strong>g (DAB) Forum decided to propose<br />

Korea’s terrestrial DMB technology as a European standard to the European Telecommunication Standard<br />

Institute (ETSI). The m<strong>in</strong>istry said that the adoption of the Korean terrestrial DMB technology as a European<br />

standard would enable Korea to secure core technologies of next-generation digital broadcast<strong>in</strong>g, which will<br />

help Korea to take up favourable position <strong>in</strong> pre-empt<strong>in</strong>g the market.<br />

8.30.2.6 Operator strategies<br />

Broadband subscriber prices <strong>in</strong> Korea have been among the lowest <strong>in</strong> the world s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>troduction of the<br />

services. Early on, the subscription fees dropped to about 25 US$. In 2002, monthly subscription fee, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

modem rental, was about 25 US$ for residential ADSL and 32 US$ for bus<strong>in</strong>ess ADSL. Cable modem<br />

subscriptions had similar prices. As was noted above, the subscriber prices are now somewhat higher <strong>in</strong> dollar<br />

terms, and about 25 to 30 €, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g equipment rental and taxes. At these prices, Korean subscribers get on<br />

average 4 Mbps connections.<br />

An important reason for the low subscriber prices has been very strong facilities-based competition, created by<br />

heavy <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> compet<strong>in</strong>g networks, but also exceptionally easy access to the customers and their local<br />

network. the local loop <strong>in</strong> Korean networks has been unbundled and open for competition by default (see above<br />

under “supply”). KTs competitors have also effectively used the possibilities to comb<strong>in</strong>e exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities. In<br />

particular, regional cable TV networks have been available for Hanaro and Thrunet as an alternative access<br />

channel to customer households. Cable TV operators, which have had exclusive licenses <strong>in</strong> their regions, have<br />

not themselves provided data communication services. This has left the market to Thrunet, Hanaro and other<br />

broadband providers. Cable TV operators simply share revenues with broadband providers, without compet<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with them. In effect, also the cable network, therefore, has been unbundled <strong>in</strong> Korea.<br />

611 MIC 2004, IT 8-3-9 Strategy: The Road to $20,000 GDP per capita.


Page 274 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The dom<strong>in</strong>ant operator KT therefore has been unable to drag its feet. Instead, it has actively marketed its<br />

broadband services, for three reasons. First, it had to respond to competitors on the market, as it could not slow<br />

them down us<strong>in</strong>g its control over local loop access. Second, for historical reasons, KT was not the dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />

player <strong>in</strong> leased l<strong>in</strong>e data communication market, where Dacom had monopoly until the end of the 1980s. In<br />

other countries, many <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom operators have found it difficult to cannibalise their leased l<strong>in</strong>e market,<br />

where subscription prices have been high. Third, the rapid diffusion of mobile phones <strong>in</strong> Korea meant that fixed<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e subscriber growth ground to halt <strong>in</strong> 1998, and <strong>in</strong> 1999 mobile phone penetration exceeded fixed l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

penetration. The growth <strong>in</strong> fixed l<strong>in</strong>e market was therefore ma<strong>in</strong>ly seen <strong>in</strong> data communications services, where<br />

the average revenue per user was up to seven times higher than <strong>in</strong> basic voice services. Given this competitive<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g, the rapid rollout of ADSL broadband services was clearly an attractive choice for KT, as it could<br />

effectively leverage its exist<strong>in</strong>g copper-based network to provide services to this rapidly grow<strong>in</strong>g market. Heavy<br />

competition has therefore led to low broadband subscriber prices.<br />

An important reason for the low subscriber prices has also been the political preference for low prices. Although<br />

there is no formal price control for broadband subscriber prices, the strong role of MIC and its capability to<br />

direct <strong>in</strong>vestment fund<strong>in</strong>g and negotiate the conditions for competition means that service providers take also the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation society development policies <strong>in</strong>to account. KT published its “KT Future Strategies 2010” <strong>in</strong> August<br />

2004. CEO Yong-Kyung Lee stated that “<strong>in</strong> consideration of our close connection with the government's policy,<br />

KT’s new <strong>in</strong>dustrial growth eng<strong>in</strong>es will be aligned with the country’s IT 8-3-9 policy, and this is an expression<br />

of our will<strong>in</strong>gness to play a lead<strong>in</strong>g role <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g this beneficial policy.” KT aims to <strong>in</strong>vest about 1 bn<br />

US$ annually until 2010 to develop five new growth eng<strong>in</strong>es, i.e. next-generation mobile communications,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g WiBro and 4G, home network<strong>in</strong>g, media, IT services, and digital contents.<br />

KT seeks to comb<strong>in</strong>e its wireless local area network (WiFi) <strong>in</strong> areas where WiBro services might be blocked.<br />

KT has about 15,000 WiFi access po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> Korea, which enable people to connect to the Internet at a maximum<br />

speed of 11Mbps. It has also started to upgrade its WiFi services, offer<strong>in</strong>g now a speed of up to 54 Mbps with an<br />

average throughput of 25 Mbps. SK Telecom, <strong>in</strong> turn, tries to mix WiBro with digital multimedia broadcast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(DMB). Whereas KT will complement WiBro with fixed WiFi, SK Telecom could perhaps try and use its<br />

WCDMA 3G network to complement WiBro. SK Telecom and Hanaro also made a collaboration agreement just<br />

before submitt<strong>in</strong>g their WiBro license applications <strong>in</strong> December 2004. Under the agreement, Hanaro and SK<br />

Telecom will share their base stations and access networks for WiBro nationwide, exclud<strong>in</strong>g Seoul and six<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>cial cities. As noted above, Hanaro, however, gave up its WiBro licence <strong>in</strong> April. Also the WCDMA<br />

subscriber numbers have rema<strong>in</strong>ed very low, which seems to slow down <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> the 3G WCDMA<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure.<br />

Hanaro, <strong>in</strong> turn, agreed to share 451 base stations with KRT net, a company that exclusively holds and operates<br />

base stations <strong>in</strong> military facilities and remote rural areas. After its merger with Thrunet, Hanaro will have about<br />

4 million households as customers. In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, it could try to roll out <strong>in</strong>novative new broadband architectures<br />

and services. In theory it could, for example, comb<strong>in</strong>e VDSL or cable modems with wireless home networks,<br />

WiBro, and WiMax to provide ubiquitous voice and multimedia data access to its customers. Hanaro could then<br />

become a local phone service company, as orig<strong>in</strong>ally planned—this time, however, by provid<strong>in</strong>g voice-over-IP.<br />

8.30.2.7 Applications<br />

Government sponsored Internet centres provide broadband access <strong>in</strong> Korea. Between 2000 and 2003, the local<br />

government constructed 5,477 access centres and post office 2,786 access centres. In addition, there are about<br />

24,000 Internet-Cafés, or “PC Bangs,” <strong>in</strong> Korea.<br />

In the Korean broadband development, the economic downturn of 1997-98 played an important role. The<br />

economic crisis occurred at a time when the global Internet boom was about to arrive its peak. A large number<br />

of recently unemployed people looked for new ways to earn their <strong>in</strong>come. The emerg<strong>in</strong>g availability of low-cost<br />

leased-l<strong>in</strong>e access to the Internet produced a large number of entrepreneurs who started to provide Internet<br />

access <strong>in</strong> “PC rooms.” The first PC rooms or “PC Bangs” emerged <strong>in</strong> 1998, and their number skyrocketed to<br />

22,549 <strong>in</strong> 2001. 612 To set up a PC bang, a new entrepreneur had to buy or lease PCs and some chairs and tables,<br />

and connect the room to the Internet us<strong>in</strong>g a broadband l<strong>in</strong>k. The high-speed connection enabled e-mail,<br />

chatt<strong>in</strong>g, music download<strong>in</strong>g, participation <strong>in</strong> on-l<strong>in</strong>e communities, and most-important, multiplayer onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

games.<br />

PC Bangs became very popular for four reasons. First, they were attractive bus<strong>in</strong>ess propositions to people who<br />

were look<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>come and work. They required relatively low <strong>in</strong>vestments, and as soon as the network was<br />

612 NCA 2004: White Paper Internet Korea, p. 31.


Page 275 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g, they produced a steady revenue stream. This rapidly <strong>in</strong>creased the supply of broadband access <strong>in</strong><br />

Korea. Second, PC Bangs used hourly rates <strong>in</strong> the range of 1 US$ and less, which made them attractive and<br />

possible for young people, who actively experimented with new services and shared knowledge about them.<br />

Third, the rapidly grow<strong>in</strong>g PC bang user group provided the critical mass of Korean-speak<strong>in</strong>g broadband users.<br />

This made bus<strong>in</strong>ess models based on content creation attractive. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the fast national broadband backbone<br />

enabled the users <strong>in</strong> different PC rooms to be connected at high-speeds. This produced the killer-application <strong>in</strong><br />

the content bus<strong>in</strong>ess: mak<strong>in</strong>g multiplayer on-l<strong>in</strong>e games possible with<strong>in</strong> Korea. The boom <strong>in</strong> PC Bangs was also<br />

reflected <strong>in</strong> the growth of Internet service providers. Between 1998 and 2002 the number of ISPs grew almost<br />

five-fold. S<strong>in</strong>ce the second-half of 2002, the ISP sector, however, as started to consolidate.<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

millions of USD ( 1 USD ~ 1,200 KRW)<br />

1998.1<br />

1998.4<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Games<br />

Digital imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Animation<br />

Web <strong>in</strong>formation contents<br />

e-Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Digital music<br />

Electronic publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Figure 102: Digital contents market <strong>in</strong> Korea, 2003<br />

(source: Korea Institute of Multimedia Contents and Software).<br />

1998.7<br />

1998.10<br />

1999.1<br />

1999.4<br />

<strong>Number</strong> of KRNIC member ISPs<br />

1999.7<br />

1999.10<br />

2000.1<br />

2000.4<br />

2000.7<br />

2000.10<br />

2001.1<br />

2001.4<br />

2001.7<br />

2001.10<br />

2002.1<br />

2002.4<br />

2002.7<br />

2002.10<br />

2003.1<br />

2003.4<br />

Digital character<br />

Figure 103: Internet service providers <strong>in</strong> Korea (source: KRNIC).<br />

2003.7<br />

2003.10<br />

2003.12<br />

2004.3


Page 276 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Korea has been the lead<strong>in</strong>g country <strong>in</strong> the development and use of multiplayer on-l<strong>in</strong>e games. The gam<strong>in</strong>g<br />

phenomenon has, <strong>in</strong>deed, become a key driver <strong>in</strong> broadband diffusion. The lead<strong>in</strong>g game players are national<br />

heroes, and both fixed l<strong>in</strong>e and mobile operators spend huge sums to recruit top players. KTF, the KT mobile<br />

affiliate and the second largest mobile operator, has been reported to pay 7 trillion won for two lead<strong>in</strong>g players.<br />

It has often been stated that the Korean <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> games has a cultural basis. An alternative explanation could<br />

be that the rapid expansion of on-l<strong>in</strong>e games was simply generated by the availability of broadband<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure. The Korean PC Bangs were connected at high speed to the Korean broadband backbone, allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>terconnections with low latency and short delays between the users of PC Bangs, as well as <strong>in</strong>teractive<br />

graphics <strong>in</strong> games. This <strong>in</strong>frastructure was necessary for the development of massively distributed multiplayer<br />

role-games. If a similar technical architecture would have been available <strong>in</strong> other countries, it is possible that the<br />

popular “Korean <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> games” explanation for the rapid diffusion of broadband <strong>in</strong> Korea would lose some<br />

of its credibility. One factor <strong>in</strong> the success of multiplayer computer games <strong>in</strong> Korea has also been the fact that<br />

Korea has restricted Japanese imports. Instead of specialised game consoles, Koreans have therefore focused on<br />

PC-based games.<br />

The onl<strong>in</strong>e game market is expected to be grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Korea dur<strong>in</strong>g the next years, with the fastest growth <strong>in</strong><br />

mobile games. The game revenues <strong>in</strong> PC Bangs are expected to saturate, as households now have their own<br />

broadband connections. The growth of the Korean game market is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 53. Korean onl<strong>in</strong>e game<br />

producers have been extremely successful domestically, and they are now export<strong>in</strong>g software and game concepts<br />

to Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Taiwan and Southeast Asia. In 2003, Korean onl<strong>in</strong>e games accounted for about 7 percent of the global<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e gam<strong>in</strong>g market.<br />

Market 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

annual<br />

growth rate<br />

Onl<strong>in</strong>e-game 1,628 2,985 4,656 7,042 9,330 11,168 12,406 13,145 28.0%<br />

Mobile-game 17 497 727 1,352 2,474 4,125 6,422 9,491 63.5%<br />

PC-game 1,323 1,810 902 1,275 1,276 1,277 1,278 1,278 -5.6%<br />

Arcade-game 5,844 3,528 4,142 3,984 3,894 3,830 3,782 3,745 1.0%<br />

Console<br />

HW 18 29 1,012 1,015 1,512 1,649 1,947 2,238 106.3%<br />

SW 72 117 898 943 1,009 1,435 1,700 1,973 60.1%<br />

Total 90 146 1,910 1,958 2,521 3,084 3,647 4,211 75.1%<br />

Subtotal 8,902 8,966 12,337 15,611 19,495 23,484 27,535 31,870 23.5%<br />

Onl<strong>in</strong>e Internet<br />

café<br />

Computer-game<br />

room<br />

13,343 19,832 19,441 22,763 23,873 24,446 24,731 24,870 3.8%<br />

8,634 5,969 6,570 5,928 5,703 5,543 5,422 5,329 -1.9%<br />

Total 30,879 34,767 38,348 44,301 49,072 53,473 57,688 62,069 10.1%<br />

Table 53: Korean game market forecast<br />

(source: Korean Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment System Industry Association, Dec. 2003).<br />

The sales of digital music <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> Korea was about 154 million US$ <strong>in</strong> 2003, with mobile r<strong>in</strong>gtones<br />

represent<strong>in</strong>g about 70 percent of this market. Most of the music downloads occurred through file-shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

systems that did not charge for the content. The onl<strong>in</strong>e movie market was about 70 million US$ <strong>in</strong> 2003. There<br />

were over 300 onl<strong>in</strong>e movie websites. The sales ratio for adult movies and domestic feature movies was about<br />

6:4 <strong>in</strong> 2002 and 3:7 <strong>in</strong> 2003. This change was at least partly caused by government regulations concern<strong>in</strong>g adultoriented<br />

websites. The availability of broadband connections has also made Internet broadcasts possible. In this<br />

area, enterta<strong>in</strong>ment content is the market leader, with 28 % <strong>in</strong> 2003, followed by educational content, at 14 %.<br />

The distribution of Internet broadcasts by content type is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 54.


Page 277 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

No. of Internet Broadcasts %<br />

Education/Study 66 14.3<br />

Vocational education 29 6.3<br />

School 44 9.5<br />

Sports 14 3.0<br />

Animation 6 1.3<br />

Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment 14 3.0<br />

Movies 21 4.5<br />

Music 60 13.0<br />

Games 4 0.9<br />

Other amusements 11 2.4<br />

Public <strong>in</strong>stitutions 12 2.6<br />

Companies/Organizations 10 2.2<br />

Society/Culture/Welfare 30 6.5<br />

Regional<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation/Liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

50 10.8<br />

Current issues/Economy/Management 22 4.8<br />

Arts 5 1.1<br />

Religion 18 3.9<br />

Teens 11 2.4<br />

Hobby/Leisure 26 5.6<br />

News 4 0.9<br />

Health/Medic<strong>in</strong>e 5 1.1<br />

Total 462 100<br />

Table 54: Internet broadcasts <strong>in</strong> Korea, Dec. 2003 (source: NCA / IT Public Webcast<strong>in</strong>g).


8.30.3 Broadband policy<br />

Page 278 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Korean policymakers have been very active <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation technologies, based on the vision that the<br />

future of Korea depends on its capability to transform itself <strong>in</strong>to a knowledge-based society and economy.<br />

Information and communication technologies are viewed as the path towards higher economic growth, better<br />

<strong>in</strong>comes, and global competitiveness. A purely economic view of development, however, does not well describe<br />

the Korean policies. The Korean visions, <strong>in</strong> particular, have perceived <strong>in</strong>formation and communication<br />

technologies as a key to social transformation. This strong developmental emphasis contrasts the Korean visions,<br />

for example, with the U.S. visions, where ICTs are more often described as technologies that improve economic<br />

efficiency and <strong>in</strong>dividual choice. The strong societal dimension also br<strong>in</strong>gs the Korean Information Society<br />

strategies relatively close to the European and <strong>in</strong> particular the Nordic models. A major difference, however, is<br />

the existence of strong l<strong>in</strong>ks and detailed roadmaps for <strong>in</strong>dustrial development and <strong>in</strong>formation society policies,<br />

as well as the strong coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g role of public policymakers. Such close l<strong>in</strong>ks would be difficult <strong>in</strong> the<br />

European Union.<br />

Key government policy makers <strong>in</strong>clude the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Information and Communication (MIC) and the National<br />

Computerization Agency (NCA). The Framework Act on Informatisation Promotion of 1995 created the<br />

Informatisation Promotion Committee <strong>in</strong> 1996, which is led by the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister. The Presidential Committee<br />

on Government and Innovation Decentralisation (PCGID), <strong>in</strong> turn, acts as an advisory body to the office of the<br />

president, with a specific aim at public sector reform and e-Government. The <strong>in</strong>stitutional framework of the<br />

Korean <strong>in</strong>formatisation policy is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 104.<br />

Figure 104: Korean framework for national <strong>in</strong>formatization (source: NCA).<br />

The MIC has developed the Korean Information Society both by gradually deregulat<strong>in</strong>g it and by putt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pressure on the large chaebols to open up for competition. Deregulation and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g competition has not<br />

occurred at random, though. Koreans have been quite successful <strong>in</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g their <strong>in</strong>dustries after the domestic<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry has been strong enough for global competition. In particular, <strong>in</strong> the 1990s Korea actively developed<br />

domestic standards and <strong>in</strong>tellectual property that gave it simultaneously relatively protected domestic markets<br />

and time to develop a competitive advantage. Recently, Korea has focused on <strong>in</strong>ternational technology<br />

standards.<br />

The Korean Information Society policies have also centered on skills development, <strong>in</strong>dustrial development, and<br />

the reduction of digital divides. To overcome the current and future shortage <strong>in</strong> IT skills, the government has<br />

<strong>in</strong>vested 33.5 billion won <strong>in</strong> support of education <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>formation and communication area, the establishment<br />

of a technical high school specialis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> software development, and basic research <strong>in</strong> related subjects.<br />

Furthermore, the government has provided support for the development of a University Information and


Page 279 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Communication Research Center, and Information and Communication University Overseas Scholarship<br />

Program for ASIC design and JAVA tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. The government has also sponsored <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

communication re-tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g courses for the unemployed with high academic backgrounds from traditional<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries. This will assist such qualified unemployed to f<strong>in</strong>d jobs <strong>in</strong> the IT sector or to start new IT bus<strong>in</strong>esses.<br />

In addition, government support has been provided to IT professional education organisations, cyber universities<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the field of <strong>in</strong>formation and communications, the <strong>in</strong>vitation and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of foreign IT specialists and<br />

experts. To further develop human resources <strong>in</strong> the IT field, the government has provided computer literacy<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and education aimed at elementary and middle schools, housewives, the military, and the disabled. 613<br />

A major <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> this area has been the three-year 10 Million People IT Education project, which was<br />

launched <strong>in</strong> mid-2000. Some 3.6 million people received basic Internet and computer tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this program <strong>in</strong><br />

2000, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g over one million residents <strong>in</strong> local communities, about 300,000 housewives, and 23 thousand<br />

prison <strong>in</strong>mates. In total, almost 14 million people received tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the three years. The program was<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued with the 2 nd National IT learn<strong>in</strong>g program. A new four-year IT Education Program for 5 million<br />

underprivileged started <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of 2005.<br />

The government will <strong>in</strong>vest approximately 430 billion won <strong>in</strong> expand<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>volvement of regular educational<br />

organisations <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation and communication education, as well as cooperation with overseas schools and<br />

universities. The government also plans to sponsor the retra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>dustrial workers, bridge the digital gap<br />

among the popultion, and develop a highly skilled workforce for the IT field. The government will expand its<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> discover<strong>in</strong>g gifted IT talents <strong>in</strong> their early stages and nurtur<strong>in</strong>g them to contribute to the world<br />

economy.<br />

The Korean Digital Divide Act was established <strong>in</strong> 2001 and revised <strong>in</strong> 2002. It generated the five-year master<br />

plan for clos<strong>in</strong>g the digital divide, annual action plans, the “Digital Divide Clos<strong>in</strong>g Committee,” and launched<br />

the Korean Agency for Digital Opportunity and Promotion (KADO). The spend<strong>in</strong>g for the master plans is about<br />

1.9 bn US$, with about 300 million US$ <strong>in</strong> 2004. The 2004 annual action plan consisted of construct<strong>in</strong>g highspeed<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation network <strong>in</strong> rural areas, support<strong>in</strong>g assistive technologies for disabled people, the construction<br />

of 80 Internet access centres, recycl<strong>in</strong>g of PCs and Digital TVs to disabled and non-profit organisations, and<br />

provid<strong>in</strong>g IT education. KADO also developed content for disabled and the elderly, and engaged <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

projects that aimed at clos<strong>in</strong>g the digital divide. Korean policies also <strong>in</strong>cluded 30 to 50 % discounts <strong>in</strong><br />

telecommunication service charges to low-<strong>in</strong>come and disabled users.<br />

The failed attempt by Hanaro to enter local telephony services had shown that competition <strong>in</strong> the local loop was<br />

difficult without number portability. As a result, the government announced detailed plan to implement number<br />

portability <strong>in</strong> fixed telecommunication services <strong>in</strong> January 2001 and for the mobile market <strong>in</strong> January 2002. The<br />

Telecom Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Act of Korea mandated a new obligation <strong>in</strong> December 2000 to the facilities-based service<br />

providers (KT, Hanaro and Thrunet) to provide their unbundled elements to competitors. Furthermore, the<br />

government f<strong>in</strong>alised the details of the obligation and a pric<strong>in</strong>g scheme <strong>in</strong> December 2001, so that the<br />

unbundl<strong>in</strong>g obligation also works <strong>in</strong> practice. 614<br />

As the Information Society is perceived to be a systemic transformation <strong>in</strong> the Korean society and economy,<br />

broadband policies are also very tightly connected with <strong>in</strong>dustrial and R&D policies. In 2000, the government<br />

designated 174 core strategic technologies for technology development projects <strong>in</strong> order to ga<strong>in</strong> a technological<br />

competitive edge <strong>in</strong> the world market, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the next-generation Internet, optical communications, digital<br />

broadcast<strong>in</strong>g, wireless communications, and computer software. In addition, the government has improved the<br />

appraisal system for the selection of research subjects, and has helped to establish effective research<br />

management methods for the efficient use of R&D fund<strong>in</strong>g and maximis<strong>in</strong>g the benefits of R&D.<br />

An important factor <strong>in</strong> the Korean broadband development has been the Informatisation Promotion Fund. This<br />

fund has rotated license auction fees and telecom taxes back to telecom <strong>in</strong>frastructure development. In contrast<br />

to most other countries where 3G license fees were not earmarked, Korea has been able to provide low <strong>in</strong>terest<br />

loans for communications <strong>in</strong>frastructure development <strong>in</strong> less-advantaged regions, as well as fund<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

Information Society–related R&D. The actual amount of the fund for 2004 was 1.2 bn US$, with 740 million<br />

US$ earmarked for R&D. 615<br />

The role of FDI <strong>in</strong> Korea has been relatively m<strong>in</strong>or, although about 13,600 companies made <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong><br />

Korea <strong>in</strong> 2003. After the f<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis <strong>in</strong> 1997, the government <strong>in</strong>itiated tax reduction measures for high-tech<br />

613 http://www.kado.or.kr<br />

614 Local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g has been <strong>in</strong> effect s<strong>in</strong>ce 2002, based on LRIC (long-run <strong>in</strong>cremental cost) charg<strong>in</strong>g. A fully unbundled leased l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

is charged 9,200 won per month and a shared-l<strong>in</strong>e ASDL service 6,100 won a month. See, Ure, J. 2003: Competition <strong>in</strong> the local loop:<br />

unbundl<strong>in</strong>g or unbungl<strong>in</strong>g? Info, 5(5), pp. 38-46.<br />

615 MIC, Investment Opportunities <strong>in</strong> Broadband IT Korea, p. 16.


Page 280 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses, bus<strong>in</strong>esses <strong>in</strong> foreign <strong>in</strong>vestment zones and service bus<strong>in</strong>esses (exemption from or reduced national<br />

taxes for 10 years, local taxes for 15 years) to cope with the recession. In 2003, LG Philips LCD and Nokia<br />

TMC were the largest foreign companies <strong>in</strong> Korea, the former with about 5 bn US$ and the latter with about 2.6<br />

bn US$ revenues. Indirectly, the rapid growth of the ICT sector has, however, legitimised domestic <strong>in</strong>vestments<br />

<strong>in</strong> the ICT <strong>in</strong>frastructure and skills.<br />

Rent reduction policies are applied <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial complexes for foreign companies, 25 national <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

complexes, and Foreign Investment Zones, with 100 % exemption for high-tech bus<strong>in</strong>esses and 75 % reduction<br />

for general manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries. In the Foreign Investment Zones, companies that are more than 30 %<br />

owned by foreign <strong>in</strong>vestors and have more than 10 regular full-time workers who have a master’s degree or<br />

higher with more than 3 years of R&D experience, can get free land leases, exemption for traffic <strong>in</strong>crease taxes<br />

and exemptions or reductions of national and regional taxes. Research and Development programs and related<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments can get low-<strong>in</strong>terest loans, government match<strong>in</strong>g funds and cash grants.<br />

Hostile takeovers by foreign companies have been allowed s<strong>in</strong>ce May 1998. Currently, there are no ceil<strong>in</strong>gs on<br />

foreign ownership of special and value-added telecommunication service providers. The ceil<strong>in</strong>g on s<strong>in</strong>gle-person<br />

ownership on facilities-based service providers has been abolished except for Korea Telecom. Foreign aggregate<br />

ownership of facilities-based service provider is allowed up to 49%. Acquisition by a non-telecom company has<br />

also been allowed. There is no foreign ownership ceil<strong>in</strong>g on IT equipment and software bus<strong>in</strong>esses.<br />

8.30.4 Conclusion<br />

Korea’s lead<strong>in</strong>g position <strong>in</strong> the global broadband diffusion has produced several studies that have tried to<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> the factors that underlie the development of Internet and broadband <strong>in</strong> Korea. The U.K. DTI study 616<br />

proposed that six success factors underlie the rapid expansion of broadband <strong>in</strong> Korea: 1) geography and<br />

demographics, 2) government leadership, 3) facilities-based competition, 4) the PC bang phenomenon, 5)<br />

pric<strong>in</strong>g, and 6) the emergence of clear user benefits. The ITU Korean Broadband study 617 , <strong>in</strong> turn, po<strong>in</strong>ts out that<br />

Korea has a very high literacy rate and very high school enrolment rates. ITU also highlights the role of the<br />

domestic Korean IT equipment <strong>in</strong>dustry, which successfully reduced the cost of ADSL equipment.<br />

A number of academic studies have also focused on the factors that underlie broadband diffusion <strong>in</strong> Korea. Lee,<br />

O’Keefe and Yun 618 proposed that the match<strong>in</strong>g of demand and supply was the most important factor, produced<br />

by fierce <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition, onl<strong>in</strong>e gam<strong>in</strong>g, and social and cultural factors such as hous<strong>in</strong>g patterns,<br />

social pressure to keep up with the neighbours, and tight social networks. They also noted that the economic<br />

crisis of 1997 and the deregulation of telecom <strong>in</strong>dustry played an important role both by <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

government efforts to move Korea to the knowledge-based economy and by provid<strong>in</strong>g entrepreneurial<br />

opportunities for unemployed people. Lee and Chan-Olmsted 619 , <strong>in</strong> turn tried to compare the U.S. and Korean<br />

broadband diffusion patterns us<strong>in</strong>g a modified Porterian diamond model of national competitive advantage.<br />

They found that, <strong>in</strong> particular, active government policies have probably created more predictable roadmaps for<br />

the evolution of broadband and related technologies <strong>in</strong> Korea than <strong>in</strong> the U.S., where uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the future have perhaps slowed down broadband-related <strong>in</strong>vestments. Park and Yoong 620 , <strong>in</strong> turn, argued that<br />

market and technological factors were the key drivers. They also noted that consistent and strong government<br />

policies that promoted competition, developed the <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>frastructure and created demand were<br />

important; as well as socio-cultural factors such as PC Bangs, hous<strong>in</strong>g patterns, and cultural homogeneity.<br />

Although some broadband diffusion factors <strong>in</strong> Korea are now taken more or less for granted—such as the<br />

importance of hous<strong>in</strong>g structure—one needs to be careful <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g and extrapolat<strong>in</strong>g them. As almost 80<br />

percent of Koreans live <strong>in</strong> densely populated urban areas, cost effective deployment of broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

has been exceptionally easy <strong>in</strong> Korea. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the DTI report, construction costs accounted for only 14 %<br />

of cost per ADSL subscriber <strong>in</strong> Korea <strong>in</strong> 2002. 621 About 95 percent of the population live with<strong>in</strong> 4 kilometres of<br />

KT’s local exchanges, which made it possible for KT to use its exist<strong>in</strong>g copper wir<strong>in</strong>g to provide ADSL. Almost<br />

half of the population lives <strong>in</strong> large apartment complexes with up to 600 dwell<strong>in</strong>gs per build<strong>in</strong>g. Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />

616<br />

DTI Overseas mission to South Korea. Brunel University, 2002.<br />

617<br />

ITU 2003: Broadband Korea: Internet Case Study, ITU, March 2003.<br />

618<br />

Lee, H., O’Keefe, R.M. & K. Yun (2003): The growth of broadband and electronic commerce <strong>in</strong> South Korea: contribut<strong>in</strong>g factors. The<br />

Information Society, 19. pp. 81-93.<br />

619<br />

Lee, C. & S.M. Chan-Olmsted (2004): Competitive advantage of broadband Internet: a comparative study between South Korea and the<br />

United States. Telecommunications Policy, 28(9/10), pp. 649-677.<br />

620<br />

Park, S. & S-H Yoon (2005): Separat<strong>in</strong>g early-adopters from the majority: the case of broadband Internet access <strong>in</strong> Korea. Technological<br />

Forecast<strong>in</strong>g and Social Change, In press.<br />

621<br />

KT reported costs of about USD 360 per ADSL subscriber <strong>in</strong> 2000 and USD 273 <strong>in</strong> 2002. Construction work represented 14 percent,<br />

backbone transmission 24 percent, gigabit switch router 20 percent, and equipment 42 percent.


Page 281 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

regulations set up <strong>in</strong> the 1970s have required that these apartment complexes have a s<strong>in</strong>gle communications<br />

room <strong>in</strong> the basement, from which all the apartments can be accessed us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>-house wir<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This, however, does not mean that high urban density or large apartment complexes would be drivers for<br />

broadband diffusion. More accurately, they are contextual factors that have <strong>in</strong>fluenced decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

specific historical moments of time. In fact, the associated driver has been related to a specific configuration of<br />

competitive power <strong>in</strong> Korea <strong>in</strong> 1999. The ownership structure of <strong>in</strong>-build<strong>in</strong>g wir<strong>in</strong>g and unbundled cable<br />

networks <strong>in</strong> effect removed the local loop bottleneck. Unregulated Internet access service markets and ADSL<br />

made it possible for new entrants to use this opportunity to rapidly roll out Internet access services. Although,<br />

economically speak<strong>in</strong>g, ADSL was “impossible” <strong>in</strong> the conventional bus<strong>in</strong>ess sense, the widely publicised “new<br />

economy” model where large economic losses were justified by future profit opportunities, made it possible to<br />

bypass traditional profit models. At the same time, the rapid expansion of Internet content and the fixed pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of broadband services made the new services attractive for a large customer base. The dom<strong>in</strong>ant operator<br />

realised that its traditional profit models were erod<strong>in</strong>g, and it responded aggressively, try<strong>in</strong>g to pre-empt the new<br />

entrants.<br />

This logic cannot be repeated <strong>in</strong> other countries. New technologies and technical architectures have become<br />

possible, and the cost structures have changed radically dur<strong>in</strong>g the last seven years. For example, the traditional<br />

local loop bottleneck has only limited importance today, both because alternative channels have become<br />

available and because local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g is now to a large extent implemented <strong>in</strong> many countries. After the<br />

Internet boom and crash, many <strong>in</strong>vestors are also more conservative, and require profit and effective<br />

management of economic risks.<br />

Economic actors have been the ma<strong>in</strong> drivers of the broadband diffusion <strong>in</strong> Korea. The government, however,<br />

has also been very active <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation society <strong>in</strong> Korea. The Korean Information Infrastructure<br />

(KII) projects were launched <strong>in</strong> 1995. The KII project consisted of a high-speed government funded network,<br />

the New Korea Network – Government (NKN-G), and the commercial New Korea Network – Public (NKN-P).<br />

The NKN-G provided high-speed connections for government agencies and universities, whereas the NKN-P<br />

was supposed to become the basic <strong>in</strong>frastructure for broadband multimedia <strong>in</strong>formation services for private<br />

firms and homes.<br />

Competition has also been very heavy <strong>in</strong> Korea. The new entrants Hanaro and Thrunet were able to use<br />

Powercomm’s hybrid fibre-cable network to get access to customers. As the <strong>in</strong>-build<strong>in</strong>g wir<strong>in</strong>g is owned by the<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g owners <strong>in</strong> Korea, the dom<strong>in</strong>ant player KT could easily be bypassed by connect<strong>in</strong>g the build<strong>in</strong>g telecom<br />

room <strong>in</strong>to the compet<strong>in</strong>g networks. The copper-based network was unbundled only <strong>in</strong> 2002. The relatively slow<br />

unbundl<strong>in</strong>g has not been a major factor <strong>in</strong> Korea, as the cable TV networks have also been effectively<br />

unbundled and as the build<strong>in</strong>g owners have controlled the <strong>in</strong>-build<strong>in</strong>g wir<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

As the PC Bangs grew <strong>in</strong> popularity, they provided a very efficient market<strong>in</strong>g channel for the new broadband<br />

services. Because a large majority of broadband users were accessible to PC Bangs, there was little need to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> general consumer market<strong>in</strong>g and advertis<strong>in</strong>g. For the customers, PC Bangs gave the opportunity to try<br />

out and learn broadband services without committ<strong>in</strong>g to monthly subscriber fees and expensive equipment<br />

purchases. PC Bangs also provided a critical mass of potential customers that were necessary for the success of<br />

content providers. For example, about 80 % of the revenues of the lead<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e game provider NCsoft came<br />

from PC Bangs when it launched its first products. The large broadband user group that PC Bangs created<br />

further became a key factor <strong>in</strong> generat<strong>in</strong>g demand for home broadband services.<br />

Broadband subscriber fees have been low s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>troduction of the service. This was encouraged by the<br />

Korean government policy that viewed broadband as a key to social and economic development. Korean<br />

policymakers therefore wanted to avoid a situation where only high-<strong>in</strong>come families would have access to the<br />

service.<br />

The government and service providers have also highlighted the potential educational benefits of broadband<br />

access. In particular, the Korean government has been active <strong>in</strong> supply<strong>in</strong>g high-quality educational content<br />

through the web. The educational potential of the broadband Internet has created both legitimacy and pressure<br />

on the parents to get broadband access to their children. These pressures have probably <strong>in</strong>creased when children<br />

became familiar with the possibilities of broadband through PC Bangs. Children who had learned to play<br />

network games and use other content <strong>in</strong> PC Bangs could easily push their parents to get broadband access by<br />

borrow<strong>in</strong>g the popular policy rhetoric of broadband as the key to educational success. To some extent,<br />

educational services on broadband have also replaced traditional after-school classes, allow<strong>in</strong>g children to<br />

participate <strong>in</strong> additional school<strong>in</strong>g and do their homework at home. In this sense, the various <strong>in</strong>terests of the<br />

government, service providers, equipment manufacturers, parents, and their children have been well-aligned <strong>in</strong><br />

Korea.


Page 282 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

It has also been argued that the culturally homogeneous Korean society has <strong>in</strong>creased diffusion of broadband<br />

services. Socio-cultural homogeneity probably has been important <strong>in</strong> the sense that when new applications and<br />

technologies become <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and relevant for early users, they often are <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g also for the rest of the<br />

society. 622 Korean society, however, is also a Confucian society, where hierarchy is important. This comb<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

has meant that the citizens, although be<strong>in</strong>g part of a homogeneous culture, also compete aga<strong>in</strong>st each other <strong>in</strong> an<br />

attempt to climb the social ladder. This competitiveness has been effectively used by the Korean government,<br />

who early on started to certify build<strong>in</strong>gs accord<strong>in</strong>g to their broadband connection speed. New apartment<br />

complexes are often marketed by broadband access speed and their broadband certification is often visibly<br />

marked on the build<strong>in</strong>g walls.<br />

The table <strong>in</strong> the annex gives an overview of the ma<strong>in</strong> factors that studies have highlighted <strong>in</strong> their explanations<br />

of the rapid advance of broadband <strong>in</strong> Korea.<br />

622 This has been argued to create similar fast diffusion patterns <strong>in</strong> Korea and F<strong>in</strong>land, for example. For a more detailed analysis of the l<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

between social structure and technology diffusion, see: Tuomi, I. Networks of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.


8.30.5 Annex: Broadband diffusion factors <strong>in</strong> various studies.<br />

Page 283 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2


8.31 Non-EU country studies: Canada<br />

8.31.1 Introduction<br />

Page 284 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Canada is the second biggest country <strong>in</strong> the world with a size of almost ten million sq km hav<strong>in</strong>g around 31<br />

million <strong>in</strong>habitants (or three <strong>in</strong>habitants per sq km). Canada was <strong>in</strong>cluded primarily because of its lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

position <strong>in</strong> the global Broadband race. Size of the country was not among the reasons why Canada was chosen<br />

because only a very small (and profitable to serve) geographical area is connected to the Internet via broadband.<br />

The Canada case study focuses on a few selected parameters: likely “killer broadband services”, price for access,<br />

and the level of competition. Moreover, the case study highlights some of the most important <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

undertaken by the federal and prov<strong>in</strong>cial governments.<br />

In 2003, the Canadian Communication Regulator CRTC has published a very useful and comprehensive<br />

report. 623 Much <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> this case study has been taken from this source. 624<br />

8.31.2 The broadband market<br />

On a global scale, Canada is <strong>in</strong> the lead<strong>in</strong>g tier <strong>in</strong> terms of BB penetration. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> 2003 there were more<br />

high-speed Internet households (28%) than there were households with dial-up subscriptions (24%). Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the OECD, broadband penetration rate stood at 14.8% <strong>in</strong> December 2003 with only one country (South<br />

Korea) do<strong>in</strong>g better<br />

The communications sector overall is play<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important role <strong>in</strong> the Canadian economy. In 1998,<br />

the contribution of the telecommunications <strong>in</strong>dustry to the economy was 1.9%. Five years later this share<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased to 2.7%. Capital expenditure of the communications sector accounts for 3.5% of total-economy-wide<br />

capital expenditure <strong>in</strong> 2002. 625 The Internet access market is the fastest grow<strong>in</strong>g market <strong>in</strong> the converged<br />

communication market with a revenue growth of 24% last year. Revenues for (dial-up and broadband) access<br />

accounted for $2.6 billion <strong>in</strong> 2002 <strong>in</strong> a 32 billion CDN Dollar market. Of the $ 2.6 billion, roughly $ 2 billion<br />

accounted for the residential BB and $ 600 million for bus<strong>in</strong>esses access. In 2002, there were 6.5 million<br />

residential (or 51% of all households) with Internet access subscriptions. 626<br />

As for market players, <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom carriers are – for example – Bell Canada, Aliant, Telus. Competitiors<br />

are cable operators (e.g. Rogers and Shaw) and other alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure providers (e.g. Allstream and<br />

Call-Net). There are also competitors without an own network – for <strong>in</strong>stance resellers (e.g. Primus) and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent ISPs (e.g. AOL Canada). 627 In terms of revenues, by far the most powerful players are the<br />

<strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom carriers. Of the overall $ 32 billion CDN $ communications market the large regional<br />

<strong>in</strong>cumbents account for $ 24 billion <strong>in</strong> revenues. 628 Competitors account for 8 bn or roughly 25% of the overall<br />

market (cable companies account for 3 bn and other alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructures for $ 3.6 bn).<br />

8.31.2.1 Supply<br />

The costs for connect<strong>in</strong>g rural areas are considerably higher than for connect<strong>in</strong>g urban areas. Moreover, demand<br />

<strong>in</strong> rural areas is lower than <strong>in</strong> urban areas. However, 13 million people or half of the total population lives <strong>in</strong> an<br />

area of 33 000 sq km. 629 Costs for connect<strong>in</strong>g those 33 000 sq km are very low (compared to connect<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

other 99,97% of the country). In this respect, only 28% of all Canadian communities, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to 80% of<br />

the total population 630 , have broadband access. 631 Canada thus faces a difficult challenge to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> its lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

position <strong>in</strong> broadband penetration rates <strong>in</strong> the years ahead. Costs for connect<strong>in</strong>g the other 72% of the<br />

communities and 99,97% of the land mass are much higher than connect<strong>in</strong>g 0.03 % and the most profitable 28%<br />

623<br />

Report to the Governor <strong>in</strong> Council: Status of Competition <strong>in</strong> Canadian Telecommunications Markets report, available at<br />

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/PolicyMonitor<strong>in</strong>g/2003/gic2003.pdf ; CRTC (2003)(last visited: 22. September 2004)<br />

624<br />

In particular, section 4.4 on Internet services provide valueable data. CRTC (2003) p. 49-61.<br />

625<br />

CRTC (2003) at p. 8.<br />

626<br />

CRTC (2003) p. 49.<br />

627<br />

CRTC (2003) at p. 51 and Annex 4. For more <strong>in</strong>fo on the competitive landscape and market shares <strong>in</strong> particular see below.<br />

628<br />

CRTC (2003) at p. 12.<br />

629<br />

http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/popdwell/Table-CMA-N.cfm?T=2&SR=126&S=3&O=A (last visited: 4.<br />

August 2004).<br />

630<br />

CRTC (2003), p. 58.<br />

631<br />

http://broadband.gc.ca/pub/faqs/faqscomplete.html#whatsnsi (last visited: 4. August 2004).


Page 285 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

of the communities. Figure 105 shows coverage of mobile phones. 632 This graph was <strong>in</strong>cluded to give an<br />

impression of network dimensions <strong>in</strong> a bus<strong>in</strong>ess with a 20 year history of liberalization and competition. 633<br />

Figure 105: National Mobile Coverage <strong>in</strong> Canada<br />

Of course, there are differences between BB and mobile phone networks. However, whether the BB map looks<br />

much more “colourful” <strong>in</strong> 20 years rema<strong>in</strong>s to be seen. Satellite is one obvious technology which could help<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g BB to people <strong>in</strong> rural areas. In 2003, Canada launched a Satellite program to connect regions which<br />

cannot be served economically with wirel<strong>in</strong>e access. 634 Canada has also a very useful site dedicated to<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure issues. 635<br />

The degree of <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition <strong>in</strong>fluences broadband access and usage. 636 Canada is <strong>in</strong> a very good<br />

position <strong>in</strong> this respect because there is fierce competition between cable and xDSL technologies with a roughly<br />

equal market share <strong>in</strong> terms of access l<strong>in</strong>es. 637 Hence, <strong>in</strong> some Canadian cities there is no dom<strong>in</strong>ant access<br />

technology (or company for that matter), but rather there is a good degree of competition ensur<strong>in</strong>g balanced<br />

market prices.<br />

The retail Internet access market accounts for roughly 2.6 billion $. The <strong>in</strong>cumbent telephone companies<br />

accounted for 41% of the retail Internet access revenues <strong>in</strong> 2002 while the cable companies had 35% and all<br />

632 CRTC (2003) p. 71.<br />

633 In 1984 a duopoly was formed and <strong>in</strong> 1995 two additonal licenses have been issued.<br />

634 http://www.ic.gc.ca/cmb/welcomeic.nsf/0/85256a5d006b972085256db8004f7cb2?OpenDocument (last visited 28. Sept.)<br />

635 http://www.<strong>in</strong>frastructure.gc.ca/<strong>in</strong>dex_e.shtml ((last visited 28. September)<br />

636 Pric<strong>in</strong>g of the content service is different and also plays an important role (e.g. VOD services are <strong>in</strong> competition with offl<strong>in</strong>e video<br />

retailers and companies such as Netflix which deliver physical DVDs to customers at reasonable prices).<br />

637 OECD (2004) Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Prices <strong>in</strong> the OECD,<br />

http://www.oecd.org/document/31/0,2340,en_2649_34225_32248351_1_1_1_1,00.html (last visited: 4. August 2004).


Page 286 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

other competitors together had 23%. 638 Table 55 shows the development over the past five years: The <strong>in</strong>cumbent<br />

telephone companies’ market share <strong>in</strong> the important retail bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>creased considerably from 1998-2002. In<br />

the residential Internet access market (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dial-up) the telecom <strong>in</strong>cumbent <strong>in</strong>creased its market share from<br />

36.1% to 41.2% <strong>in</strong> the five year period and the cable <strong>in</strong>cumbent from 14% <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 35.5% <strong>in</strong> 2002. Those<br />

ga<strong>in</strong>s came at the expense of competitors which market share has steeply decl<strong>in</strong>ed from 49.9% to 23.3%. 639<br />

Retail Internet Access<br />

1998 2002<br />

ILEC 141.7 (36.1 %) 1045.4 (41.2 %)<br />

Cable 54.9 (14.0 %) 899.4 (35.5 %)<br />

Competitors 196.1 (49.9 %) 591.9 (23.3 %)<br />

Total 392.7 2536.8<br />

Table 55: Retail Internet access<br />

Specifically with respect to BB, <strong>in</strong>cumbents market share <strong>in</strong>creased from 80% (DSL) to 91% and rema<strong>in</strong>ed at<br />

virtually 100% <strong>in</strong> the case of cable. 640 Altogether, Canada is <strong>in</strong> a good position with respect to <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

competition. Though smaller competitors are loos<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>cumbents the situation is better than <strong>in</strong> many other<br />

countries because cable <strong>in</strong>frastructure is a viable option for many people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> urban areas.<br />

Closely related to <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition, pric<strong>in</strong>g for BB access services is an important factor with regard to<br />

penetration rates. CRTC conducted a survey and asked consumers about their choice of local, long-distance, and<br />

Internet service providers. With regard to the latter, they regarded “price” as the most important followed by<br />

“quality of service” and convenience. 641 In terms of BB pric<strong>in</strong>g, Canada is also do<strong>in</strong>g very well <strong>in</strong> a global<br />

context. Table 56 gives an overview over BB pric<strong>in</strong>g offers from October 2003. A 1 MB ADSL of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>cumbent Bell Canada cost 27 US$ while cable operator Rogers charges 34 US$ (<strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>in</strong>stallation<br />

costs of 61$). Apart from low prices, Canada stands out <strong>in</strong> that 11MB broadband FWA are available at low<br />

prices (23 US$). However, those services are not widely available. 642<br />

8.31.2.2 Demand<br />

This section gives an overview over recent developments <strong>in</strong> Canada relat<strong>in</strong>g to the supply of services/content<br />

expected to boost demand for broadband, <strong>in</strong> particular address<strong>in</strong>g some legal and pric<strong>in</strong>g aspects of VOIP<br />

(Voice-Over-IP telephony) and VOD (Video-On-Demand). Both services are not only expected to have an<br />

overall positive effect on broadband access and usage rate, but also promise to br<strong>in</strong>g more competition to the<br />

application layer (e.g. Skype is <strong>in</strong> competition with <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom carriers).<br />

As <strong>in</strong> many countries around the globe, <strong>in</strong> Canada telecom and cable operators have been offer<strong>in</strong>g “triple play<br />

services” (Internet, telecommunication and broadcast<strong>in</strong>g services). 643 Moreover, (global) Internet-based<br />

companies such as Skype and Apple's iTunes are new entrants and offer their services <strong>in</strong> competition with<br />

<strong>in</strong>cumbents. In Canada VOIP is be<strong>in</strong>g offered by a variety of companies. In addition to the <strong>in</strong>cumbent Bell<br />

Canada, Spr<strong>in</strong>t, Vonage and Primus are now offer<strong>in</strong>g local phone services us<strong>in</strong>g (partly) IP technology. This<br />

638 CRTC (2003), p. 53.<br />

639 Annual CRTC report, at p. 53.<br />

640 CRTC (2003), p. 57.<br />

641 CRTC (2003) p. 120.<br />

642 OECD (2004): Benchmark<strong>in</strong>g Broadband Prices <strong>in</strong> the OECD, p. 20. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/58/17/32143101.pdf<br />

643 http://www.cedmagaz<strong>in</strong>e.com/ced/2001/0901/09e.htm (last visited 20. September 2004).


Page 287 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases competition <strong>in</strong> the local phone market which has been traditionally been dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the <strong>in</strong>cumbents<br />

Bell Canada and Telus. 644 Vonage and Primus rely on VOIP only. 645<br />

Company Access type Payment plan Speed (Kbps) Monthly<br />

charge ($)<br />

Incumbent<br />

Download<br />

Limit<br />

Install.<br />

charge ($)<br />

Bell Canada ADSL DSL Basic 128/64 23 2 GB 19<br />

Bell Canada ADSL High Speed 1024/320 27 Unlimited 0<br />

Bell Canada ADSL High Speed Ultra 3072/640 46 Unlimited 19<br />

Telus ADSL High Speed Internet 1500/512 27 0<br />

Telus ADSL Enhanced high Speed 2500/640 34 0<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

DSL.ca ADSL 1.2 MB Home User 1200 31 Unlimited 0<br />

Alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

Rogers CATV Hi-Speed Internet Lite 128/64 23 Unlimited 61<br />

Rogers CATV Hi-Speed Internet 1500/192 34 Unlimited 61<br />

Gulf Islands FWA GI Lite 11 MB 23 1 GB 0<br />

PriS FWA Option B 2500/2500 22 1-6 GB 190<br />

Table 56: Broadband prices <strong>in</strong> Canada October 2003<br />

The price difference between VOIP and traditional PSTN communication services is one of the decisive criteria<br />

for people to use a service. 646 If pric<strong>in</strong>g of VOIP is sufficiently low to offset m<strong>in</strong>or quality losses and<br />

conveniance, VOIP might very well be a killer application trigger<strong>in</strong>g people to sign up for Broadband access. In<br />

this respect, Primus offers its service for around 16 CAN$ and charges 140 $ for hardware. Vonage has a<br />

monthly fee of 20$, a one time <strong>in</strong>stallation fee of 40$ but gives hardware away for free. Apart from those<br />

charges, costs for Broadband Internet access are to be added. In comparison, Bell Canada is charg<strong>in</strong>g 25 $ l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

rental and Spr<strong>in</strong>t around 30$. Value added services (e.g. Voicemail, caller ID) are provided by all operators. 647<br />

Exact subscriber numbers for VOIP are difficult to gather. Recent figures speak of 15 000 pay<strong>in</strong>g subscribers <strong>in</strong><br />

Canada. 648 It has been reported that by June 2004 a mere 23% of Canadians knew about VOIP. 649 However,<br />

Analysys Research forecasts global VOIP penetration to be about 17% (or 11.7 million) of all Broadband<br />

enabled households. The consumer and small bus<strong>in</strong>ess segments are estimated to be worth around 5.7 bill US$<br />

644<br />

Canada's Phone Giants Face Internet Threat By BERNARD SIMON; Published: May 5, 2004<br />

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/05/bus<strong>in</strong>ess/worldbus<strong>in</strong>ess/05canada.html?ex=1399089600&en=13703900736eb8c9&ei=5007&partn<br />

er=USERLAND<br />

645<br />

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/OttawaSun/Bus<strong>in</strong>ess/2004/05/12/455822.html (last visited 20. September).<br />

646<br />

CRTC (2003) p. 120.<br />

647<br />

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/OttawaSun/Bus<strong>in</strong>ess/2004/05/12/455822.html (last visited 20. September).<br />

648<br />

http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/f<strong>in</strong>ancialpost/story.html?id=d492a4dd-ffcf-44f5-9f4e-6fc5e0781e73 New tech threat to<br />

telcos Internet telephones: BCE, Telus wary of consumer shift to upstarts' systems; Kev<strong>in</strong> Restivo F<strong>in</strong>ancial Post Saturday, September<br />

18, 2004<br />

649<br />

http://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2004/06/67_of_canadiens.html (last visited 20. September 2004).


Page 288 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

<strong>in</strong> 2008 (which is a mere 2.5% of the US telecom revenues of 2003). In the medium and large bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

segment, Analysys Research <strong>in</strong>dicates annual growth rates of 50% until 2008. 650<br />

As for some legal aspects of VOIP, currently around the globe National Regulatory Agencies are discuss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

whether telecom regulation should also be applied to Internet phone companies. In Canada, the NRA (CRTC)<br />

took the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary view that Internet phone companies should be regulated <strong>in</strong> the same way as traditional<br />

telecom operators because both types of operators offer similar functionality. CRTC takes the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary view<br />

that technological neutrality requires VOIP operators to be subject to the exist<strong>in</strong>g regulatory framework. The<br />

public consultation process is still undergo<strong>in</strong>g so the position of the CRTC is not f<strong>in</strong>al. 651<br />

A second killer application is expected to be Video-On-Demand (VOD) and onl<strong>in</strong>e distribution of enterta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

content (e.g. iTunes). In this respect, the Internet allows for a distribution of digital enterta<strong>in</strong>ment content over<br />

Broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Costs have been considerable but are fall<strong>in</strong>g steadily. 652 With respect to VOD<br />

offer<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom carrier Bell Canada is the largest operator of Digital TV (ExpressVu) but it does<br />

not offer the service over its Broadband network. 653 Telus has applied <strong>in</strong> 2003 for a VOD license but does not<br />

mention the service on its website (as of September 2004). 654 Currently, VOD over ADSL is only offered by a<br />

few companies <strong>in</strong> Canada. For <strong>in</strong>stance, SaskTel <strong>in</strong> the prov<strong>in</strong>ce Saskatchewan has launched VOD <strong>in</strong> October<br />

2003. It has been reported that SaskTel has 14 000 subscribers <strong>in</strong> May 2004. Moreover, Aliant <strong>in</strong> Eastern<br />

Canada is offer<strong>in</strong>g its TV on PC service. 655<br />

As for legal aspects of VOD, <strong>in</strong> June 2004, the <strong>in</strong>cumbent Canadian telecom carrier Bell applied for a license to<br />

deliver cable over its DSL l<strong>in</strong>es .While CRTC allowed phone companies SaskTel and Manitoba Telecom<br />

Services to offer cable-style television services, CRTC noted that the dom<strong>in</strong>ant position of Bell <strong>in</strong> the phone<br />

segment requires special attention. 656 No firm decision has been made yet.<br />

Normally, obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a license to deliver VOD services <strong>in</strong> Canada is not a problem. However, legal obstacles for<br />

the delivery of the VOD service exist <strong>in</strong> relation to contractual obligations imposed on the distributor by the<br />

copyright holders fear<strong>in</strong>g piracy and P2P networks. In this context, the Canadian Copyright Board stated its<br />

op<strong>in</strong>ion that download<strong>in</strong>g via P2P networks is fair use and therefor legal under Canadian copyright laws. In the<br />

same decision, the Board stated that upload<strong>in</strong>g is illegal and it imposed heavy levies (25$) on portable music<br />

devices such as the iPod. 657 In addition, a Canadian federal judge ruled that fileshar<strong>in</strong>g is legal under Canadian<br />

copyright laws. 658 The decision is be<strong>in</strong>g appealed by the Canadian Record<strong>in</strong>g Industry Association (CRIA). The<br />

basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is the same for music and movies. It rema<strong>in</strong>s to be seen what impact those decisions have on the<br />

will<strong>in</strong>gness of copyright holders to use the Internet to distribute their content on-Demand to Canadians and<br />

therefore become a competitor to KaZaa <strong>in</strong> the market for on-Demand delivery of enterta<strong>in</strong>ment content.<br />

8.31.3 Broadband policy 659<br />

As for facilitation measures, CRTC has set up an Interconnection Steer<strong>in</strong>g Committee (CISC) which provides a<br />

forum for <strong>in</strong>terested parties with the help of CRTC staff to resolve local competition implementation issues of a<br />

technological, operational or adm<strong>in</strong>istrative nature. In addition, CRTC offers to mediate <strong>in</strong> case of conflicts.<br />

Crucially, this saves time for formal proceed<strong>in</strong>gs. 660 One can also classify the sett<strong>in</strong>g up of the National BB Task<br />

Force (NBTF) as a facilitation measure by the government of Canada. The Task Force provides advice as to how<br />

BB can be extended to all Canadians. In 2001, the Task Force published a report and suggested there<strong>in</strong> two<br />

alternative models which aim at <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rural BB penetration rates <strong>in</strong> Canada. 661 The <strong>in</strong>frastructure support<br />

model aims at provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>centives to stimulate supply of BB transport to eligible communities. There is direct<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g for both – <strong>in</strong>frastructure and access – for certa<strong>in</strong> communities. The second model is the community<br />

aggregator model which aims at stimulat<strong>in</strong>g demand for BB capabilities with<strong>in</strong> currently unserved communites<br />

by directly support<strong>in</strong>g a local “demand aggregator” (often a government <strong>in</strong>stitution).<br />

650<br />

http://www.analysys.com/default_acl.asp?Mode=article&iLeftArticle=1570&m=&n= (last visited 21. September 2004).<br />

651<br />

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2004/8663/c12_200402892.htm (last visited 20. September 2004).<br />

652<br />

A good overview over costs of deliver<strong>in</strong>g a VOD service can be found on http://www.po<strong>in</strong>ttopic.com/content/bmm/profiles/video+on+demand.htm&comp_id=783<br />

(last visited 20. September 2004)<br />

653<br />

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/pwc/talk<strong>in</strong>g_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000617813 (last visited 20. September 2004).<br />

654<br />

http://about.telus.com/publicpolicy/broadcast_vodla.html (last visited September 20).<br />

655<br />

http://www.po<strong>in</strong>t-topic.com/content/bmm/profiles/video+on+demand.htm&comp_id=783 (last visited 20. September 2004)<br />

656<br />

http://www.friends.ca/News/Friends_News/archives/articles06090407.asp (last visited 20. September 2004).<br />

657<br />

http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/new-e.html (last visited 21. September).<br />

658<br />

http://news.com.com/2100-1027-5182641.html (last visited 21. September).<br />

659<br />

Section 5 of the CRTC (2003) report conta<strong>in</strong>s a detailed list of public measures aimed at improv<strong>in</strong>g deployment of BB networks <strong>in</strong><br />

Canada. CRTC (2003), p. 94-110.<br />

660<br />

CRTC (2003) at p. 7.<br />

661<br />

National Broadband Task Force, The New National Dream: Network<strong>in</strong>g the Nation for Braodband Access, June 2001.


Page 289 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

As for regulation, the most important decisions regard<strong>in</strong>g competition <strong>in</strong> the communications market are to be<br />

found <strong>in</strong> Annex 3of the Candian CRCT report of 2003. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong>cumbents are subject to regulation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

market for local telephon access. 662<br />

As for broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure, Canada adopts a very pro-active role. At federal level, one of the key <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

steps was the establishment of the National Broadband Task Force (NBTF) <strong>in</strong> early 2001. In their f<strong>in</strong>al report<br />

the estimate costs for connect<strong>in</strong>g all communitees to be between 2.8 and 4.6 billion with<strong>in</strong> a three-year time<br />

frame. The biggest cost factors are transport between communities (1.3 – 1.9 billion) and last mile access (0.9 –<br />

2 billion). Two important federal <strong>in</strong>itiatives that are currently be<strong>in</strong>g implemented are the Broadband for Rural<br />

and Northern Development Pilot (BRAND) Program and the National Satellite Initiative. Both aim at connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

unserved areas and unconnected communities. 663<br />

Reagrd<strong>in</strong>g the BRAND program, not-for-profit organizations <strong>in</strong> remote communities can apply for fund<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

the mak<strong>in</strong>g of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess plan. If the bus<strong>in</strong>ess plan has been submitted and accepted further funds are given to<br />

the community. After the first round (sett<strong>in</strong>g up a bus<strong>in</strong>ess plan) 2.4 million $ have been given to 89 projects. In<br />

the second round, 65 proposal received additional 1.8 million $. 664 In total 105 million $ have been allocated to<br />

this project by the federal government.<br />

The Community Access Program (CAP) aims to establish free Internet access po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> schools, hospitals and<br />

other public centers. Moreover, Schoolnet deserves attention as it is a program which aims not to connect<br />

schools, but to address the “human factor” and the people who are supposed to use BB and computers. In<br />

particular, Schoolnet focuses on provid<strong>in</strong>g teachers and students with skills to use computers. Another federal<br />

BB project is the establishment of the Canarie research network. 665 There is also an <strong>in</strong>itiative (“Broadband<br />

Marketplace”) where Communities can f<strong>in</strong>d help to develop and/or implement their broadband bus<strong>in</strong>ess plans<br />

and can post requests for proposals for broadband services. 666<br />

There are also a number of programs at prov<strong>in</strong>cial level. All of them fall either <strong>in</strong> the aggregator or <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

support model. 667 Alberta Supernet will l<strong>in</strong>k 4700 government offices, schools and health facilities <strong>in</strong> 422<br />

communities across the prov<strong>in</strong>ce which corresponds to connect<strong>in</strong>g around 80% of its population. Importantly,<br />

there are two areas – the Base and the Extended – Area which are to be connected seamlessly. The Base area<br />

consists of 27 larger communities and Bell West is <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g 102 million $ <strong>in</strong> the roll out. Once this roll-out is<br />

done Bell West will own the Base Area network. The smaller 395 communities are <strong>in</strong> the Extended area. The<br />

government is <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g up to 193 million $ <strong>in</strong> the project and the government of Alberta will own this<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure. AxiaSuperNet Ltd. Manages the whole network for a period of 10 years. The contract can be<br />

renewed after this period. In the Extended area, ISPs will also be able to connect to AlbertaSupetNet.<br />

AlbertaSupetNet connects schools, but not <strong>in</strong>dividual. In the Base Area bandwidth leas<strong>in</strong>g for ISPs will not be<br />

possible.<br />

Saskatchewan's CommunityNet can be classified as a <strong>in</strong>frastructure support model. The government has<br />

committed over 70.9 million $ to the construction of a broadband network which will l<strong>in</strong>k 1500 educational<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions, health care facilities and other public <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> 366 communities. 668 Two public sector<br />

organizations owned by the prov<strong>in</strong>ce, SaskTel and the Saskatchewan Communications Network are provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure and services. Importantly, SaskTel is able to expand its network to bus<strong>in</strong>esses and residential areas<br />

<strong>in</strong> smaller communities with l<strong>in</strong>ks to CommunityNet. In 2003, 74% of the population was reached <strong>in</strong><br />

Saskatchewan. The goal is to reach 95% of the population.<br />

Yet another prov<strong>in</strong>cial program - the Villages branches du Quebec – falls <strong>in</strong> the second demand aggregator<br />

model. The program aims to use its exist<strong>in</strong>g RISQ network <strong>in</strong> connection with – previously unconnected – local<br />

and regional facilities. The ma<strong>in</strong> idea is to aggregate demand and use public <strong>in</strong>stitutions as demand <strong>in</strong>iators<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g small bus<strong>in</strong>esses and residentials to “add their own demand”. The budget for the project is 75 million<br />

$. The fund<strong>in</strong>g program resembles the BRAND program but specifically targets educational and municipal<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions. Programs are equally be<strong>in</strong>g implemented <strong>in</strong> Manitoba, Ontario, British Columbia, News Brunswick,<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>ce Edward Island, Noca Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador. Figure 2 shows various projects aimed at<br />

deploy<strong>in</strong>g BB <strong>in</strong> Canadas remote areas. 669<br />

662<br />

CRTC (2003) at p. 7.<br />

663<br />

http://broadband.gc.ca/pub/program/<strong>in</strong>dex.html (last visited 4. August 2004).<br />

664<br />

CRTC (2003), p. 96-97.<br />

665<br />

Http://www.canarie.ca (last visited 4. August 2004).<br />

666<br />

http://www.sourcecan.com/E/sb2410.cfm? (last visited 4. August 2004).<br />

667<br />

For a comprehensive overview over prov<strong>in</strong>cial <strong>in</strong>itiatives see CRTC (2003) p. 98-107.<br />

668<br />

More <strong>in</strong>fo can be found on http://www.communitynet.ca. (lasdt visited 20 September 2004.)<br />

669 CRTC (2003) p. 110.


8.31.4 Conclusion<br />

Page 290 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Table 57: Overview Canadian programmes to accelerate broadband deployment<br />

Currently, Canada is a global leader <strong>in</strong> terms of BB penetration. However, 72% of the communities are not<br />

connected with around 20% of the Canadian population liv<strong>in</strong>g there. Given the fact that the vast majority of<br />

communities are not connected yet, the countries size will make their digital <strong>in</strong>clusion more difficult. Satellite<br />

technology and bundl<strong>in</strong>g of demand is currently coord<strong>in</strong>ated and fostered <strong>in</strong> order to lower costs for BB<br />

connection <strong>in</strong> rural areas. There are various <strong>in</strong>itiatives which target deployment of BB <strong>in</strong> rural areas. Generally,<br />

one can dist<strong>in</strong>guish between <strong>in</strong>frastructure and demand aggregation measures. Canada is implement<strong>in</strong>g – at<br />

federal, prov<strong>in</strong>cial, territorial and municipal level – both types. In addition, there are measures <strong>in</strong> place which<br />

aim to <strong>in</strong>crease computer skills of teachers and students stimulat<strong>in</strong>g demand <strong>in</strong> the long run.<br />

As for the market developments and competition <strong>in</strong> particular, from 1998 - 2002 <strong>in</strong>cumbent telecom and cable<br />

carrier have considerably ga<strong>in</strong>ed market share <strong>in</strong> the broadband Internet access market. New entrants and<br />

smaller competitors have lost considerably.


8.32 Non-EU country studies: Iceland<br />

8.32.1 Introduction<br />

Page 291 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Iceland has a PPP-adjusted GDP per capita of 29 700 $ <strong>in</strong> 2003; the EU 15 average is 27 300 $ and the OECD<br />

average is 26 300 $. 670 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the new OECD GDP comparisons based on PPP, Iceland is a middle <strong>in</strong>come<br />

country and ranks 10 th <strong>in</strong> this statistic with a score of 111. 671 Rural population <strong>in</strong> Iceland accounts only for 7.4%<br />

where the OECD average is at 22.9%. 672<br />

As for resources, Iceland has a very useful freely accessible database which has been used <strong>in</strong> this report. In<br />

particular, statistics relat<strong>in</strong>g to ICT have been taken from this database (respectively report). 673 The report<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s a <strong>in</strong>formative list of tables describ<strong>in</strong>g ICT use <strong>in</strong> Iceland. 674<br />

8.32.2 The broadband market<br />

Iceland is <strong>in</strong> the lead<strong>in</strong>g tier when it comes to BB uptake rates. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the OECD, only South Korea and<br />

Canada have a higher BB uptake rate. This lead<strong>in</strong>g position is one of the ma<strong>in</strong> reasons why Iceland was chosen.<br />

Figure 106: Use of <strong>in</strong>ternet<br />

81% of the Icelandic people use the Internet. For <strong>in</strong>stance, 74% use it to read newspapers and magaz<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Statistics Iceland reports that it is more common to f<strong>in</strong>d xDSL services <strong>in</strong> households with children (57-63%)<br />

than were there are no children (46-54%). 675 Age plays a major role <strong>in</strong> use of the Internet but gender – at least <strong>in</strong><br />

Iceland – does not. Figure 1 shows that roughly the same percentage of Icelandic men and women use the<br />

Internet. Figure 3 shows that Iceland has a higher user number than other Scand<strong>in</strong>avian countries (which, <strong>in</strong><br />

turn, use the Internet more than most other nations). 676 In 2004, 74% use the Internet at least every workday.<br />

670<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/5/34244925.xls<br />

671<br />

http://www.oecd.org/document/15/0,2340,en_2649_201185_34256911_1_1_1_1,00.html<br />

672<br />

OECD (2004) The Development of Broadband Access <strong>in</strong> Rural and Remote Areas; p. 71. (OECD 2004). Available at<br />

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/40/31718094.pdf.<br />

673<br />

http://www.hagstofa.is/template_lb_frameset_en.asp?PageID=325&<strong>in</strong>tPXCatID=246&ifrmsrc=/temp_en/ferdamal/upplys<strong>in</strong>gataekni.asp.<br />

A.pdf version is available at:<br />

http://www.hagstofa.is/template_db_frameset_en.asp?PageID=1236&ifrmsrc=/uploads/files/hag_040701.pdf&Redirect=False<br />

Hagtid<strong>in</strong>di (2004), Statistical Series Information Technology, July 2004.<br />

674<br />

Hagtid<strong>in</strong>di (2004), p. 23-44.<br />

675 Hagtid<strong>in</strong>di (2004), p. 6.<br />

676 Hagtid<strong>in</strong>di (2004), p. 14.


Figure 107: Use of <strong>in</strong>ternet<br />

Figure 108: Use of the Internet<br />

Page 292 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Statistics Iceland has a very <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g survey on how skilled Icelandics are when us<strong>in</strong>g computers. 677 (Figure<br />

109) Except the most complex task (writ<strong>in</strong>g a computer program), there is not much difference between men and<br />

women <strong>in</strong> terms of computer use <strong>in</strong> Iceland. This is important s<strong>in</strong>ce the female population represents roughly<br />

half of the Icelandic Internet population.<br />

677 Hagtid<strong>in</strong>di (2004), p. 11.


Figure 109: Computer skill<br />

Page 293 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Figure 110 shows that there is hardly any alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong> place: xDSL, ISDN and dial-up primarily<br />

offered by the <strong>in</strong>cumbent account for more than 90% of all connections. In 2004, 54% of all households are<br />

connected via xDSL services. 678<br />

Figure 110: Available connections<br />

Hence, it seems that – <strong>in</strong> the case of Iceland – <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition is not essential for achiev<strong>in</strong>g such a<br />

high uptake and penetration rate.<br />

678 Hagtid<strong>in</strong>di (2004), p. 4.


Company Access<br />

type<br />

Incumbent<br />

Payment plan Speed (Kbps) Monthly<br />

charge ($)<br />

Sim<strong>in</strong>n ADSL ADSL 256 256/128 40<br />

Sim<strong>in</strong>n ADSL ADSL 256 256/128 61<br />

Sim<strong>in</strong>n ADSL ADSL 1500 1536/256 51<br />

Sim<strong>in</strong>n ADSL ADSL 2000 2048/512 87<br />

Sim<strong>in</strong>n ADSL ADSL 2000 2048/512 108<br />

Independent ISP access us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cumbent local loops<br />

Og Vodafone ADSL ADSL II 512/256 40<br />

Og Vodafone ADSL ADSL II 512/256 60<br />

Og Vodafone ADSL ADSL IV 1024/512 40<br />

Og Vodafone ADSL ADSL IV 1024/512 60<br />

Table 58: Broadband prices <strong>in</strong> Iceland October 2003<br />

Page 294 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Download<br />

Limit<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(100 MB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(1 GB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(100 MB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(100 MB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(1 GB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(100 MB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(1 GB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(100 MB Int)<br />

Unl. Dom.<br />

(1 GB Int)<br />

Installation<br />

charge ($)<br />

Iceland Statistics made a survey <strong>in</strong> 2002 why people do not have Internet access at home. Only 1% cite access<br />

costs as too high while 38% that “access is undesirable” and 19% have access somewhere else. 679 This seems to<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate that new services need to be developed respectively the benefits of exist<strong>in</strong>g services shown rather than<br />

lower<strong>in</strong>g prices.<br />

8.32.3 Broadband policy<br />

The Icelandic Government is very active. 680 Measures regard<strong>in</strong>g the content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure level <strong>in</strong>clude the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

One facilitation measure <strong>in</strong> relation to the <strong>in</strong>formation society (and implicitly to the crucial provision of public<br />

BB services) is the sett<strong>in</strong>g up of a special management team which focuses on the establishment of egovernment<br />

and which assists and encourages between 2004 and 2007 public <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> their e-government<br />

efforts. 681 Other committees with similar tasks are be<strong>in</strong>g formed <strong>in</strong> relation to technical aspects of electronic case<br />

procedures, on the preservation of electronic data and on register<strong>in</strong>g metadata for public <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

A comprehensive E-Government portal is be<strong>in</strong>g established. One important goal of this portal is<br />

userfriendl<strong>in</strong>ess: a citizen should not need to know <strong>in</strong> advance which organisation provides the service he<br />

needs. 682 Educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions specifically support and <strong>in</strong>troduce distributed learn<strong>in</strong>g by offer<strong>in</strong>g courses on<br />

the Internet. There is also an Educational Gateway. 683<br />

Moreover, digital materials are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly used <strong>in</strong> classes. In this respect, Hvar.is is a portal which provides<br />

Icelandic people (checked by their IP addresses) free access to more than 8000 scientific journals (e.g.<br />

ScienceDirect) and 350 000 pieces of literature. 684 Parallel to this content related <strong>in</strong>itiatives, teachers are to be<br />

educated <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g digital resources.<br />

679 http://www.hagstofa.is/template_lb_frameset_en.asp?PageID=325&<strong>in</strong>tPXCatID=246&ifrmsrc=/temp_en/ferdamal/upplys<strong>in</strong>gataekni.asp<br />

680 A summary of the national Information Society Policies can be found on http://eng.forsaetisraduneyti.is/<strong>in</strong>formation-society/nr/1248<br />

681 Resources to Serve Everyone Policy of the Government of Iceland on the Information Society 2004-2007, p. 11. Icelandic Prime<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry (2004) . Available at: http://eng.forsaetisraduneyti.is/<strong>in</strong>formation-society//nr/1327<br />

682 Icelandic Prime M<strong>in</strong>istry (2004), p. 12.<br />

683 Icelandic Prime M<strong>in</strong>istry (2004), p. 22. http://www.menntagatt.is/<br />

684 http://www.hvar.is/english/<strong>in</strong>dex.html<br />

64<br />

64<br />

64<br />

64<br />

64<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0


Page 295 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The health care high speed network is expected to be fully operational <strong>in</strong> 2006. Electronic patient registers are<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced, electronic transactions between State Social Security Institutions and health care workers are<br />

expected to be implemented by 2005. 685 In addition, medical <strong>in</strong>stitutions are be<strong>in</strong>g connected via high-speed<br />

networks. 686 This network is <strong>in</strong>tended to be a channel for electronic communications with<strong>in</strong> the health sector. It<br />

is a closed system where access is restricted and as to ensure data security. The cornerstone of the network is a<br />

name server which determ<strong>in</strong>es access rights. However, as this network builds on exist<strong>in</strong>g telecommunications<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure it is more a virtual, software based rather than a real, hardware based network.<br />

LangTec aims to preserve the Iceland language and culture <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly converg<strong>in</strong>g world. The project is<br />

publicly funded and co-operates with other similar Scand<strong>in</strong>avian project. 687<br />

A high speed network connect<strong>in</strong>g Icelandic Universities and Research Institutions with each other and with<br />

other research <strong>in</strong>stitutions abroad is be<strong>in</strong>g rolled out. All compulsory schools and the lead<strong>in</strong>g cultural <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

under municipal control should have high-speed connections by 2005. 688<br />

8.32.4 Conclusion<br />

Iceland is one of the lead<strong>in</strong>g countries <strong>in</strong> terms of broadband uptake. Factors which expla<strong>in</strong> this lead<strong>in</strong>g position<br />

are a very low number of people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas (only 7.4%), a high GDP per capita and general openness<br />

towards new technologies. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, there is no <strong>in</strong>frastructure competition <strong>in</strong> Iceland – yet only 1% cite<br />

prices as the ma<strong>in</strong> reason for not hav<strong>in</strong>g BB Internet at home. Hence – <strong>in</strong> the case of Iceland – lack of<br />

competition does not have a major impact on the broadband uptake rates.<br />

685<br />

Icelandic Prime M<strong>in</strong>istry (2004), p. 24.<br />

686<br />

Icelandic Prime M<strong>in</strong>istry (2004), p. 18.<br />

687<br />

http://www.tungutaekni.is/english.html<br />

688<br />

FS-net is a fast data transport network l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g all the upper secondary schools and lifelong education centres <strong>in</strong> Iceland.<br />

http://www.fsnet.is/


9. How to achieve broadband for all<br />

Page 296 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

This chapter tries to analyse the results of the previous country studies. It looks at factors affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband<br />

development first from a classical theoretical framework, which is composed of the supply/demand -<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure/content matrix. However, when draw<strong>in</strong>g on the elements which were identified <strong>in</strong> the country<br />

studies, it then uses a framework composed of four categories, i.e. country configuration, legacy situation,<br />

competition, and public policy, where the key criterion is the susceptibility of the factors affect<strong>in</strong>g broadband to<br />

be themselves <strong>in</strong>fluenced by broadband policy. This approach allows identify<strong>in</strong>g those areas where government<br />

action can really make a difference. F<strong>in</strong>ally, at the end of the chapter we have a quick look at some potential<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibitors of broadband development.<br />

Whilst this chapter thus focuses on what governments can do to help broadband spread, the follow<strong>in</strong>g chapter<br />

will look at one key aspect which private operators could improve: useability.<br />

9.1 Introduction<br />

The concept of “Broadband For All” refers to a situation <strong>in</strong> which broadband is not only available to every<br />

citizen, but is actually used by all of them. In that respect it is a more demand<strong>in</strong>g concept than the traditional<br />

universal service obligation <strong>in</strong> telephony, which merely stipulates the availability, at certa<strong>in</strong> conditions, of a<br />

given service. The usage of <strong>in</strong>formation and communication technologies via broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructures by all<br />

citizens is a policy objective because it is considered to be a key component of transform<strong>in</strong>g Europe <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

knowledge-based society, thus enhanc<strong>in</strong>g economic growth and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g employment.<br />

For broadband there is no “universal service” obligation for companies to provide this service to all potential<br />

customers request<strong>in</strong>g it to do so at a given price; nor is there a correspond<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g mechanism <strong>in</strong> place.<br />

Therefore, operators will provide broadband only where it is profitable by itself or when specific government<br />

<strong>in</strong>centives have made it profitable. In turn, consumers will demand broadband only where they see a benefit<br />

which exceeds the prices which the operator is charg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to make it profitable. Hence, on the market is a<br />

classical case of supply and demand. However, on a second level, supply and demand are affected by a very<br />

complex <strong>in</strong>teraction between economic, technological and political/cultural factors. Technological aspects<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude development of new transmission technologies and development of new types of services that can be<br />

transmitted via a broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Economic factors <strong>in</strong>clude market conditions such as the overall<br />

market size and the level of competition. Cultural/political factors <strong>in</strong>clude regulation and other types of policy<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention as well as differences <strong>in</strong> lifestyles or openness to new technologies.<br />

There are several ways of classify<strong>in</strong>g these factors for analytical purposes. One is to dist<strong>in</strong>guish simply between<br />

factors affect<strong>in</strong>g supply and factors affect<strong>in</strong>g demand, which factors are of course <strong>in</strong>terrelated. The demand<br />

depends on how and on what conditions broadband services are supplied. High quality services offered at low<br />

cost generate more demand than poor services offered at high costs. On the other hand, a certa<strong>in</strong> level of demand<br />

is necessary to stimulate <strong>in</strong>vestments enabl<strong>in</strong>g supply of broadband services. Another obvious way of classify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

factors affect<strong>in</strong>g the broadband market is to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure. High penetration of<br />

broadband networks is only a means for the overall purpose of enabl<strong>in</strong>g communication and two-way<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction. Yet broadband development is normally measured by the number of connections, and not by the<br />

content delivered via the broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Development of content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure may stimulate<br />

each other, but the factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure may not be the same.<br />

9.1.1 Supply of content<br />

Broadband enables distribution of new services that either did not exist or were only available off-l<strong>in</strong>e. Current<br />

examples are onl<strong>in</strong>e music platforms, Video on Demand (VoD), Voice over IP (VoIP) and web-based software<br />

applications; for <strong>in</strong>stance, Internet Protocol TV (IPTV) launched its new services <strong>in</strong> France (MaLigne tv) and<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> (Imagenio). Future applications are expected to be video-conferenc<strong>in</strong>g, broadcast multi-cast<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>teractive content. An important driver is the ability to develop new converg<strong>in</strong>g services<br />

comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g features from services used to be distributed through separate delivery channels. There is however a<br />

number of economic and political challenges related to this. For <strong>in</strong>stance, VoIP is threaten<strong>in</strong>g to cannibalise


Page 297 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

revenues of established (<strong>in</strong>cumbent and new entrants) telecom operators and the availability of (audio)-visual<br />

content is considerably affected by <strong>in</strong>tellectual property protection <strong>in</strong> form of law and technology 689 .<br />

Development of new bus<strong>in</strong>ess models and pric<strong>in</strong>g schemes are key drivers for both generation and demand for<br />

content. One of the factors beh<strong>in</strong>d the success of the Internet has been a charg<strong>in</strong>g mechanism where the end-user<br />

pays distance <strong>in</strong>dependent price and where most content is free. On the other hand this model has had clear<br />

limitations with regard to content generation, as it seems difficult for users to accept payment for certa<strong>in</strong> types of<br />

content.<br />

Supply of content is difficult to quantify and compare. In theory the supply of content is the same from<br />

everywhere, as one will be able to access the same content once the <strong>in</strong>frastructure is <strong>in</strong> place. But different<br />

languages and preferences towards locally produced content imply that users may experience national<br />

differences. Relevant measures for supply of content, which can be used for <strong>in</strong>ternational comparisons, <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

the number of digital broadcast<strong>in</strong>g channels available, number of Internet hosts etc, but these numbers will never<br />

tell the full story and can only be used as <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

9.1.2 Supply of <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

The <strong>in</strong>frastructure aspects relate to the broadband network itself. The development of supply depends on<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g network facilities as well as the level of <strong>in</strong>vestments. Network operators are mostly commercially<br />

oriented companies that assess their <strong>in</strong>vestment opportunities accord<strong>in</strong>g to the return of <strong>in</strong>vestments. The<br />

viability of <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> broadband depends on the level of total costs compared to expected revenues.<br />

The most successful access technologies for broadband have so far been ADSL and cable modems. Cable<br />

modems offer generally higher bandwidth and are cheaper than ADSL services, but cable networks are not as<br />

widespread as telecom networks. Cable modems are only offered to a certa<strong>in</strong> segment of users ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> urban<br />

areas. Wireless connections such as 3G and FWA have so far a limited penetration. 3G services have today<br />

some success <strong>in</strong> Japan and South Korea and are expected to take off <strong>in</strong> other countries as well. However the<br />

bandwidth offered is limited and can hardly be a full substitute for a wired broadband connection. FWA is more<br />

expensive and is ma<strong>in</strong>ly used by bus<strong>in</strong>ess users, but may be an attractive solution <strong>in</strong> rural areas not served by<br />

ADSL or cable. F<strong>in</strong>ally WLAN technologies may be used for provid<strong>in</strong>g broadband access <strong>in</strong> public spaces or <strong>in</strong><br />

neighbourhoods.<br />

In addition to telecom and cable-TV networks other types of <strong>in</strong>frastructures provided by municipalities or power<br />

companies may be used as a basis for provision of broadband services. Local community associations may also<br />

be a driv<strong>in</strong>g force <strong>in</strong> provision of broadband e.g. through exist<strong>in</strong>g cable networks or by use of WLAN. Some of<br />

the largest of these networks are established <strong>in</strong> co-operation with the municipalities. This has been the case <strong>in</strong><br />

e.g. Germany and <strong>in</strong> Denmark. Unlike network <strong>in</strong>vestments made by telecom or cable operators, these <strong>in</strong>itiatives<br />

are customer driven. Pool<strong>in</strong>g of demand by group of customers can be a very effective tool to decrease prices by<br />

benefit<strong>in</strong>g from economies of scale. Rather than approach<strong>in</strong>g the network operator <strong>in</strong>dividually, communities<br />

considerably strengthen the barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g power of the customers. Incidentally, such <strong>in</strong>itiatives also stimulate<br />

demand 690 .<br />

The extent to which these technologies can be applied by use of exist<strong>in</strong>g network structures affect the total cost<br />

of <strong>in</strong>vestments needed for supply of broadband services. The development of broadband facilities depends on<br />

the total cost of <strong>in</strong>vestment and on the revenues that these facilities can be expected to generate. Expected<br />

revenues depend on demand: the number of customers and the prices that can be charged for delivery of<br />

broadband services. In addition to this, the market structure – first of all, the level of competition – plays a key<br />

role <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g supply.<br />

Infrastructure supply is also helped by standardisation. Increased <strong>in</strong>dustry-wide commodisation of network<br />

elements and modularisation of <strong>in</strong>frastructure allow easy third party <strong>in</strong>teroperability. In other words, the more<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry standards emerge, the more third parties <strong>in</strong>vestments can complement the <strong>in</strong>vestments by the network<br />

operator itself. This is of particular relevance <strong>in</strong> relation to the high level of debts of many network operators.<br />

689 See section on “Inhibitors”<br />

690 see section on “Public policy”, sub-section on “Facilitation”


9.1.3 Demand for content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure services<br />

Page 298 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

As the demand for broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure is driven by the demand for content, the drivers for services and<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure are highly <strong>in</strong>terrelated although the <strong>in</strong>dicators for the level of demand are different. The most<br />

important economic factor is <strong>in</strong>come compared to the price for a broadband connection. Another socio-cultural<br />

factor can be termed the e-read<strong>in</strong>ess of the society, a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of skills, availability of term<strong>in</strong>al equipments<br />

and openness to new technologies.<br />

As a general rule, households with broadband connections are us<strong>in</strong>g the Internet longer than those with a dial-up<br />

connection. For example, <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land people who acquired broadband connection <strong>in</strong> 2003 <strong>in</strong>creased their weekly<br />

Internet use by 4 hours. There are basically four reasons for that. Firstly, households which use or <strong>in</strong>tend to use<br />

the Internet a lot are more likely to acquire broadband connections – <strong>in</strong> other words, broadband households are a<br />

self-select<strong>in</strong>g group. Secondly, the demand for services already accessible under dial-up <strong>in</strong>creases because they<br />

become more comfortable – web pages appear faster, e-mail messages take less time to download. Thirdly, s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

broadband is usually priced at a flat-rate fee, the marg<strong>in</strong>al connection price of consum<strong>in</strong>g additional services is<br />

zero, which means that demand is economically unlimited (of course, it rema<strong>in</strong>s physically and socially limited,<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce it is impossible to spend 24 hours a day directed to the Internet term<strong>in</strong>al). F<strong>in</strong>ally, households with<br />

broadband access can consumer certa<strong>in</strong> services which are not available over dial-up access 691 . For example,<br />

Voice over IP requires always-on connection. Some of the most important services actually require “broadband”<br />

<strong>in</strong> a stricter def<strong>in</strong>ition than the 256 kbps def<strong>in</strong>ition used for most statistics – video-on-demand needs bandwidth<br />

of at least 1 Mbps.<br />

Although households dom<strong>in</strong>ate demand <strong>in</strong> the most advanced countries, the use of broadband <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses is<br />

important <strong>in</strong> the less advanced economies. Bus<strong>in</strong>ess applications may also stimulate demand from households.<br />

Therefore, the structure of the economy is important for overall demand. An economy dom<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />

<strong>in</strong>formational activities must be expected to generate more demand for broadband services than an economy<br />

based on agricultural production.<br />

691 For a detailed discussion see chapter on Broadband Applications and User Needs


9.2 Factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g broadband development<br />

Page 299 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

However, for analys<strong>in</strong>g potential policies based on the country studies, it would appear to be more useful to<br />

classify the factors impact<strong>in</strong>g on broadband development accord<strong>in</strong>g to how much they are subject to <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

by policy makers. Therefore, we have grouped them <strong>in</strong>to four large groups, which we call the configuration of<br />

the country, the legacy situation, competition and policies, go<strong>in</strong>g from those factors least susceptible o change to<br />

those most susceptible to change. Strictly speak<strong>in</strong>g, the competitive situation is not a set of factors <strong>in</strong> itself, but<br />

the result of a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the legacy situation and policies, but we have given it its own chapter before the<br />

chapter on policies, because understand<strong>in</strong>g policies requires understand<strong>in</strong>g the nature of broadband competition.<br />

Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the country configuration is mostly composed of factors affect<strong>in</strong>g demand, while the legacy<br />

situation is mostly conta<strong>in</strong>s factors affect<strong>in</strong>g supply; public policies affect both, but with demand as the ultimate<br />

objective.<br />

9.2.1 Country configuration<br />

The first group of factors belong to what we would call the configuration of the country <strong>in</strong> question. This is a set<br />

of fundamental characteristics such as population density, <strong>in</strong>come etc. which usually affects pretty much every<br />

development <strong>in</strong> that country. They are therefore not specific to broadband roll-out, but <strong>in</strong>fluence it nevertheless<br />

heavily. Importantly, s<strong>in</strong>ce they are fundamental characteristics, they can not be changed by any broadband<br />

policy, but must be taken as given. True, they can change over time – for example population density can<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease, or the country can become richer – but this will take long periods, and will not happen for a specific<br />

purpose, and certa<strong>in</strong>ly not for such a narrow purpose as broadband roll-out.<br />

Let’s start with the most obvious factor: <strong>in</strong>come, i.e. GDP per capita. Clearly, <strong>in</strong>come levels have strong<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence on broadband development. The more <strong>in</strong>come households have at their disposal, the more they are<br />

able to purchase broadband services, if they so desire. This ripples through to bus<strong>in</strong>esses: although for<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses <strong>in</strong> countries with low <strong>in</strong>come broadband may be affordable, it is not profitable for them if their<br />

customers do not have access, too. The same is true for content development: only where the potential customers<br />

have sufficient <strong>in</strong>come will content be developed.<br />

However, the relationship between <strong>in</strong>come and broadband roll-out is not necessarily l<strong>in</strong>ear. As one can see from<br />

the country studies, the richest country, the US, is not at the top of broadband, while countries such as Iceland or<br />

especially South Korea, which are less wealthy than the US, perform much better than their <strong>in</strong>come would<br />

suggest. This is despite the fact that for example <strong>in</strong> South Korea, the most successful broadband country,<br />

customers spend a much larger share of their <strong>in</strong>come on broadband communication than <strong>in</strong> any other country.<br />

Among the EU countries with broadband development not correspond<strong>in</strong>g to their <strong>in</strong>come levels the most<br />

strik<strong>in</strong>g ones are perhaps Estonia <strong>in</strong> a positive sense and Ireland <strong>in</strong> a negative sense. Absolute <strong>in</strong>come levels<br />

clearly have a significant <strong>in</strong>fluence, but do not determ<strong>in</strong>e the outcome.<br />

Closely connected to <strong>in</strong>come levels is <strong>in</strong>come distribution. What is decisive for broadband roll-out is the number<br />

of customers with the necessary purchas<strong>in</strong>g power. For any given average per capita <strong>in</strong>come, this number can<br />

vary. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the best <strong>in</strong>come distribution for broadband depends, at least <strong>in</strong> the short term, on the <strong>in</strong>come<br />

level. In a rich country, a fairly equal <strong>in</strong>come distribution will lead to a large number of potential customers,<br />

because few will be too poor to afford broadband. This is for example the situation <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands. In a poor<br />

country, on the contrary, an equal distribution of <strong>in</strong>come will ensure that nobody can afford it. Paradoxically,<br />

there only an unequal distribution of <strong>in</strong>come ensures that at least some people have the necessary purchas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

power.<br />

A second factor with<strong>in</strong> the country configuration is the population density. Korea and Japan provide good<br />

examples on how high population densities can facilitate broadband development as fibre roll-out to major<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g blocks can be done at fairly low costs per subscriber As a rule of thumb, the higher the population<br />

density, the easier broadband roll-out is, s<strong>in</strong>ce a larger part of the network can be shared between several users,<br />

which means both that <strong>in</strong>frastructure costs are lower and that due to the decreas<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>al cost of capacity – a<br />

cable with 2x capacity is cheaper than 2 cables with x capacity each – network costs are lower, too. In addition,<br />

the closer the trunk is to the <strong>in</strong>dividual customer, the more <strong>in</strong>telligent network architecture can <strong>in</strong>crease capacity<br />

by allocat<strong>in</strong>g it flexibly.


Figure 111: Europe's population density. 692<br />

Page 300 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

However, the headl<strong>in</strong>e population density figure can be mislead<strong>in</strong>g. For example, a country like Spa<strong>in</strong> has a low<br />

population density, but a large part of the population lives <strong>in</strong> very high-density areas such as apartment blocks.<br />

The extreme case of this situation is Canada, which has an extremely low population density, but a very high<br />

concentration of its population. Therefore, as long as broadband penetration is fairly low, Canada’s headl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

broadband penetration figure will resemble that of a densely-populated country, but will be <strong>in</strong> danger of fall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d later, when the focus shifts to the second half of the population, which is not liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the same 0.03% of<br />

the territory as the first half. On the other hand, a country like Belgium has a very high population density, but<br />

urban sprawl has spread out a much larger share of the population <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle-family houses <strong>in</strong> the suburbs.<br />

Another aspect is the demography of a country. Traditionally, technologies have been taken up more quickly by<br />

children and young adults than by their parents. This certa<strong>in</strong>ly held true for the Internet take-off <strong>in</strong> the 1990s.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce then, older population groups have made much more rapid progress than anticipated; nevertheless, they<br />

still lag beh<strong>in</strong>d their descendants, and will probably cont<strong>in</strong>ue to do so. Therefore, countries which have a<br />

younger than average population (among our country studies that concerns the US, Canada, Iceland and Ireland)<br />

have an advantage when it comes to broadband take-up.<br />

A somewhat more speculative factor for the take-up of home-based communications technologies is the climate.<br />

The uptake of the Internet with<strong>in</strong> Europe and with<strong>in</strong> the US was certa<strong>in</strong>ly very strongly correlated with the<br />

climatic conditions; <strong>in</strong> both cases the northern areas with severe w<strong>in</strong>ters outperformed the southern ones <strong>in</strong> athome<br />

connections, while this was not the case for the parallel spread<strong>in</strong>g of mobile telephony. For broadband, the<br />

692 Source: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/ERD/DB/mapdb/map_9.htm


Page 301 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

same correlation seems to hold for the moment, with the Nordic countries and the ra<strong>in</strong>y central countries<br />

(Netherlands, Belgium) outperform<strong>in</strong>g the countries further south.<br />

Another factor of undoubted importance but of nebulous nature are the cultural characteristics of a country.<br />

Countries which are open to foreign <strong>in</strong>fluences (Belgium, Netherlands), embrac<strong>in</strong>g new technologies (South<br />

Korea, Japan), or do not put much weight on hierarchy (Iceland, Denmark) are <strong>in</strong> a better situation when it<br />

comes to broadband take-up than their opposite numbers. Equally, the time spent at home is due not only to<br />

climate, but also to cultural traditions.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, a factor which was a key <strong>in</strong> the development of the Internet which seems to be slowly los<strong>in</strong>g importance<br />

is the knowledge of the English language. S<strong>in</strong>ce a large part of the Internet content is <strong>in</strong> English, the countries<br />

where English was widely spoken or at least understood had an advantage. This advantage has dim<strong>in</strong>ished as the<br />

total available content grew, despite the fact that English rema<strong>in</strong>s dom<strong>in</strong>ant, because the content <strong>in</strong> various other<br />

languages has reached a critical mass sufficient to attract consumers unable to understand English. It rema<strong>in</strong>s to<br />

be seen whether this advantage will temporarily re-emerge when it comes to pure broadband content (i.e. content<br />

that is usable only with a broadband connection, such as video-on-demand – see somewhere else).<br />

The ideal country configuration is therefore a rich country with a fairly equally <strong>in</strong>come distribution, a high<br />

population density where a relatively young population is concentrated <strong>in</strong> urban areas rather than suburbs, bad<br />

weather and widespread knowledge of English – <strong>in</strong> other words, the Netherlands.<br />

9.2.2 Legacy situation<br />

The second group of factors belong to what we would call the legacy situation. This is a set of characteristics of<br />

the telecommunications networks such as fixed-l<strong>in</strong>e density or network ownership, which is mostly the result of<br />

historical developments. They are specific to network development, and can <strong>in</strong> theory be changed by broadband<br />

policy, although this might be difficult and time-consum<strong>in</strong>g, or politically delicate.<br />

The first factor <strong>in</strong> this group is the extension and the configuration of the telephone network. This a key<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ant for the ability to roll out DSL broadband connections quickly, s<strong>in</strong>ce DSL requires the presence of a<br />

phone l<strong>in</strong>e. Therefore, where phone l<strong>in</strong>es already exist, it is sufficient to upgrade the switches to <strong>in</strong>stall DSL,<br />

while otherwise a l<strong>in</strong>e must be established first, which is much more expensive. Also, widespread availability of<br />

fixed l<strong>in</strong>es means that consumers had a chance to experience dial-up Internet, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a higher probability<br />

that they demand broadband than if the Internet was new to them.<br />

In this respect there is a clear difference with<strong>in</strong> Europe between the old and the new member states. Whereas <strong>in</strong><br />

the former pretty much every household had a telephone l<strong>in</strong>e, this service was only available to a m<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>in</strong> the<br />

new member states. Despite some catch-up by the newcomers <strong>in</strong> the 1990s, the gap rema<strong>in</strong>s and their growth <strong>in</strong><br />

fixed l<strong>in</strong>es has come to a standstill or even gone <strong>in</strong>to reverse <strong>in</strong> the last couple of years, with the notable<br />

exception of Poland. In some of the old member states the number of fixed l<strong>in</strong>e subscriptions is decreas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rapidly, <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and Austria, as fixed telephony is substituted by mobile telephony, but the<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g similarity <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es per population can be mislead<strong>in</strong>g: Austria now has a slightly lower number of ma<strong>in</strong><br />

telephone l<strong>in</strong>es per population than Slovenia, but the deactivated l<strong>in</strong>es are still there and could be reactivated for<br />

DSL at any time – the share of customers which could be reached by DSL with simple upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the switch<br />

is still much higher <strong>in</strong> Austria than <strong>in</strong> Slovenia.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g the technical configuration of the networks, there is a gap between the old and new member states<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g digitalisation. For example, F<strong>in</strong>land completed the digitalisation of its fixed l<strong>in</strong>e network <strong>in</strong> 1996,<br />

while Slovakia had digitalised only 86% at the end of 2003. However, this gap is progressively clos<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g average length of the local loop, which is important for the bandwidth which DSL can provide, the<br />

differences are more country-specific. For example, <strong>in</strong> Italy more than 80% of twisted pair connections are less<br />

than 2 kilometres <strong>in</strong> length, giv<strong>in</strong>g it a structural advantage over countries with a higher share of longer local<br />

loops.<br />

The second factor <strong>in</strong> this group is the existence of a cable network. The presence of a cable network enables<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure-based competition 693 between DSL and cable, which are currently the two ma<strong>in</strong> broadband<br />

technologies. Whether or not a country has an extended cable TV network depends on historic circumstances,<br />

and the coverage varies enormously from country to country. Belgium and the Netherlands are as good as<br />

completely covered by cable, while Italy has no cable network to speak of. In most countries cable networks do<br />

exist, but are limited to the cities and densely populated suburban and exurban areas; they rarely cover the rural<br />

or remote areas.<br />

693 see section on “Competition”


Greece<br />

Ireland<br />

Norw ay<br />

Italy<br />

France<br />

AVERAGE<br />

Austria<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

UK<br />

Germany<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Portugal<br />

Iceland<br />

Denmark<br />

Sw eden<br />

Netherlands<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Belgium<br />

4%<br />

4%<br />

10%<br />

20%<br />

26%<br />

29%<br />

31%<br />

32%<br />

31%<br />

31%<br />

40%<br />

45%<br />

Figure 112: Population coverage by cable and DSL <strong>in</strong> EU 15<br />

Page 302 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

A key factor for the impact of the cable network on competition is its ownership. In some countries, the<br />

telephone network and the cable network belong to the same owner, either for historical reasons (Germany) or<br />

because they were recently merged (Portugal). Germany is a special case, because it has a very complicated<br />

ownership structure of the various levels of the cable network, and because the ownership has been partially<br />

separated from the telephone <strong>in</strong>cumbent recently. In other countries, such as the UK, the cable networks are run<br />

by completely different owners from the telephone network. In many cases, however, there exists a mixture<br />

where the telephone <strong>in</strong>cumbent owns one of several cable operators.<br />

Other elements of the legacy situation are less centered on the networks themselves, but rather focus on the<br />

potential customers. For example, the number of exist<strong>in</strong>g computers per capita clearly has an <strong>in</strong>fluence on<br />

broadband development, because their owners face lower connection costs, as they already own the term<strong>in</strong>al. It<br />

can also be used as a proxy for the ICT skills of the population, s<strong>in</strong>ce computer owners typically have at least<br />

basic ICT skills, whilst people without computers are likely to lack these skills. More generally, education levels<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence broadband demand, too, because better educated populations tend to have more varied <strong>in</strong>terests and<br />

therefore have more to ga<strong>in</strong> from the vast array of specialist offers on the Internet.<br />

The ideal legacy situation is therefore a country with a completely digitised, widely available telephone network<br />

which is <strong>in</strong> competition with a widely available cable network under different ownership, high level of computer<br />

ownership and of general education – <strong>in</strong> other words, the Netherlands. No wonder the Netherlands have the<br />

highest broadband penetration <strong>in</strong> the EU and now also the fastest growth <strong>in</strong> the OECD (although South Korea is<br />

still has the highest penetration rate).<br />

50%<br />

61%<br />

60%<br />

66%<br />

74%<br />

75%<br />

Cable modem<br />

DSL<br />

83%<br />

84%<br />

85%<br />

82%<br />

86%<br />

87%<br />

87%<br />

90%<br />

91%<br />

91%<br />

92%<br />

95%<br />

95%<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

Source: IDATE, Development of broadband access <strong>in</strong> Europe", Third survey, 30 June 2004<br />

99%


8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Source : OECD<br />

9.2.3 Competition<br />

Page 303 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

OECD Broadband penetration (per 100 <strong>in</strong>habitants) net <strong>in</strong>crease 2003-2004, by country<br />

OECD net <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

Netherlands<br />

Switzerland<br />

Norway<br />

Luxembourg<br />

Denmark<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

France<br />

Japan<br />

Australia<br />

Iceland<br />

Italy<br />

Belgium<br />

Sweden<br />

Portugal<br />

United States<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Germany<br />

Canada<br />

Austria<br />

Ireland<br />

New Zealand<br />

Hungary<br />

Poland<br />

Czech Republic<br />

Slovak Republic<br />

Korea<br />

Mexico<br />

Turkey<br />

Greece<br />

Figure 113: Increase <strong>in</strong> broadband subscriptions 2003-2004<br />

For actual penetration rates see <strong>in</strong>troduction to chapter on country studies<br />

One of the most crucial factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the spread of broadband is competition. The existence of several<br />

suppliers on the market has several consequences. Firstly, it tends to lower the price. Although it is also possible<br />

to lower the price to the consumer by government <strong>in</strong>tervention, for example by tax breaks or direct subsidies 694 ,<br />

price decreases by competition have the advantage that they represent improved efficiency rather, and do not<br />

cost the government anyth<strong>in</strong>g. Lower prices, <strong>in</strong> turn, <strong>in</strong>crease demand, and the price elasticity for broadband is<br />

clearly high – rapid price decreases like <strong>in</strong> France over the last eighteen months have led to equally rapid<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> uptake.<br />

Secondly, competition typically improves market<strong>in</strong>g. Where a s<strong>in</strong>gle supplier is on the market, especially if it is<br />

a long-established and well-known company, market<strong>in</strong>g tends to be neglected, while new entrants must heavily<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g to make potential customers aware of their presence. As a consequence, the product that<br />

both <strong>in</strong>cumbents and new entrants are sell<strong>in</strong>g is much more promoted than before. A third effect of competition<br />

is the faster <strong>in</strong>troduction of new products and services. This can be <strong>in</strong> terms of technical characteristics, such as<br />

higher bandwidth, or <strong>in</strong> new services, such as r<strong>in</strong>gtone download<strong>in</strong>g, or even <strong>in</strong> new packag<strong>in</strong>g of exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

products. For example, <strong>in</strong> France the <strong>in</strong>troduction of a very simple pric<strong>in</strong>g model by Freebox contributed to the<br />

DSL boom by creat<strong>in</strong>g unprecedented price transparency.<br />

Competition would ideally require completely <strong>in</strong>dependent suppliers, which would mean <strong>in</strong>dependent networks.<br />

Usually this is referred to as <strong>in</strong>frastructure-based competition, and <strong>in</strong> practice this means competition between<br />

the telephone network and the cable network. However, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple there could also be competition between<br />

several networks of the same technology. Whilst this is unlikely to happen, at least for the last mile, for cable or<br />

telephone l<strong>in</strong>es, it is quite conceivable that such competition will exist for some of the new technologies, either<br />

dynamically, or statically, or both. Dynamically would mean the race between several operators to <strong>in</strong>stall, say, a<br />

WiMax network before the other, while statically would refer to several WiMax networks operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> parallel<br />

on the same market.<br />

Whether it makes sense to have several networks or not on any given market comes back to the question of the<br />

so-called natural monopoly. If the <strong>in</strong>vestment costs account for a large share of the overall cost, and if they<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to forecasts it will take a long time to amortise these costs, it is uneconomical to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> several<br />

networks. In those cases it might be a better solution to create competition on a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>frastructure network, <strong>in</strong><br />

694 See section “Public policy”, sub-section “Direct <strong>in</strong>tervention”


Page 304 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

so far as possible. Note, however, that the “natural” monopoly is not natural at all: it depends on <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

costs and forecast revenues. New technologies or price decreases <strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g technologies can transform a<br />

natural monopoly <strong>in</strong>to a natural competitive market. In particular, fixed wireless or WiMax technology may<br />

allow for compet<strong>in</strong>g broadband networks <strong>in</strong> rural areas where the telephone network currently would seem a<br />

natural monopoly.<br />

Competition on a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>frastructure is a complex concept, both <strong>in</strong> theory and <strong>in</strong> practice, especially if the<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructure is owned by one of the compet<strong>in</strong>g service providers. In theory, the key issue is the impact of<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g competition on the <strong>in</strong>centives for build<strong>in</strong>g alternative <strong>in</strong>frastructures: it has been argued that if<br />

operators expect that they will have to grant competitors access to their networks, they will be less <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> new <strong>in</strong>frastructure. That is the reason why the EU unbundl<strong>in</strong>g requirement applies only to the longestablished<br />

telephone networks; however, <strong>in</strong> Denmark it applies as well to optical networks. A secondary issue<br />

is that by shar<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>frastructure operators will ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to competitor’s cost structures, thus facilitat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tacit collusion.<br />

In practice, competition only takes place on a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>frastructure for the last mile. In the EU, this so-called<br />

unbundl<strong>in</strong>g of the local loop is part of the common regulatory framework, and is applied by the National<br />

Regulatory Authorities (NRA) <strong>in</strong> each member state. Usually, this has been a very conflictive process. New<br />

entrants tend to compla<strong>in</strong> that the <strong>in</strong>cumbent is delay<strong>in</strong>g every step on the way and that they are overcharged for<br />

their use of the network, while <strong>in</strong>cumbents moan that <strong>in</strong>terconnection prices do not allow them to earn a decent<br />

return, thus prevent<strong>in</strong>g them from <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to network improvements. Faced with a number of complex<br />

technical and economical arguments, the NRAs have a certa<strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong> of <strong>in</strong>terpretation. By us<strong>in</strong>g this marg<strong>in</strong> of<br />

manoeuvre constructively, they can enhance broadband development significantly. For example, the French<br />

NRA is widely considered to have triggered the DSL boom <strong>in</strong> France by tough pro-competitive measures, which<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> the above-mentioned price decreases. Outside the EU, new entrants have been offered access to<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g telecom facilities such as ducts and dark fibres on very favourable terms <strong>in</strong> Japan, and this is often<br />

mentioned as one of the key factors beh<strong>in</strong>d the very rapid development <strong>in</strong> penetration of broadband.<br />

Figure 114: <strong>Number</strong> of unbundled l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> France


9.2.4 Public policy<br />

Page 305 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Public policy <strong>in</strong>cludes the factors which are by def<strong>in</strong>ition changeable, because subject to political choices.<br />

Therefore, public policy may be an important factor for stimulation of both demand and supply of broadband<br />

services. Most governments are well aware of the importance of the development of broadband communication<br />

for economic growth, employment rates and social welfare <strong>in</strong> general. They recognize that any <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

society fundamentally requires a sophisticated and reliable broadband <strong>in</strong>frastructure as the transmission l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

enabl<strong>in</strong>g citizens to access an ever grow<strong>in</strong>g repertoire of e-services and e-goods. Most countries have therefore<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed policies for the promotion of the <strong>in</strong>formation society. Policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives vary from country to country, but<br />

with<strong>in</strong> Europe they have been coord<strong>in</strong>ated, where the EU has launched the eEurope programme, which was a<br />

part of the Lisbon strategy aim<strong>in</strong>g at improv<strong>in</strong>g growth and employment <strong>in</strong> Europe (eEurope - An Information<br />

Society for all 2002) and is now followed up by the i2010 <strong>in</strong>itiative. Therefore it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g to note that the<br />

strategies of most EU member states <strong>in</strong> our country studies are remarkably similar. As part of these <strong>in</strong>itiatives,<br />

all member states were supposed to present national broadband strategies by the end of 2004, but six of the new<br />

member states have so far failed to do so695 .<br />

Variation is bigger on a worldwide scale. Some countries have focused on manufactur<strong>in</strong>g of ICT equipment<br />

(South Korea), while others have put more emphasis on the application of ICT technologies (Iceland). They also<br />

differ <strong>in</strong> their prioritisation and <strong>in</strong>tensity of governmental support. Some countries provide f<strong>in</strong>ancial support for<br />

projects stimulat<strong>in</strong>g use or production of ICT (Sweden), while others focus on creation of a competitive<br />

environment e.g. through liberalization of the telecom sector (the UK), and the remedies therefore range from<br />

direct subsidies, access (price) regulation and tax <strong>in</strong>centives to other less far reach<strong>in</strong>g facilitation measures such<br />

as <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g transparency <strong>in</strong> the market place. Even so, most programmes can be said to consist of a mix of<br />

telecom regulation, e-government, education, <strong>in</strong>dustrial and competition policy.<br />

To have a closer look at the various policy options, we have classified them <strong>in</strong>to three groups: facilitation,<br />

regulation or <strong>in</strong>tervention.<br />

9.2.4.1 Facilitation<br />

Facilitation measures are the mildest, cheapest and least controversial form of market <strong>in</strong>terference. Facilitation<br />

measures lack the formal features of regulations (decisions and orders) and do not have legal consequences for<br />

third parties. In most cases, regulators or other governmental bodies merely act as market observers without any<br />

regulatory powers. The objective of facilitation is to ensure a good environment at the market for broadband<br />

services without direct <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> the market.<br />

One particular type of this k<strong>in</strong>d of <strong>in</strong>dustrial policy is ‘guidepost<strong>in</strong>g’, where a public <strong>in</strong>stitution takes the lead <strong>in</strong><br />

creation of a common vision on future developments. Many national plans for the <strong>in</strong>formation society, e.g. the e-<br />

Japan plan, play this role, as did the eEurope <strong>in</strong>itiative. Regulatory bodies may also play an active role <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>crease of market transparency <strong>in</strong>ter alia by provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on prices, on availability of products and on<br />

consumer rights. In relation to broadband access po<strong>in</strong>ts, NRAs can offer price comparisons, product<br />

descriptions, geographical availability and the like. In many cases operators are required by law to provide this<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation anyway. As long as sensitive <strong>in</strong>formation is not <strong>in</strong>cluded, <strong>in</strong>creased market transparency can be<br />

tremendously effective <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the competitive situation and thereby stimulate <strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> broadband<br />

facilities.<br />

Demand aggregation is another facilitation measure. By group<strong>in</strong>g demand of various <strong>in</strong>stitutions, such as the<br />

local hospital, the local school and the local library, sufficient demand can be created to entice an operator to<br />

serve an area previously considered unprofitable. In Ireland, the concept has been extended to a website<br />

enabl<strong>in</strong>g potential <strong>in</strong>dividual users to register their <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> subscrib<strong>in</strong>g to a broadband service with only<br />

aggregate data be<strong>in</strong>g passed to service providers. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>in</strong> the UK the private operator BT has equally set<br />

up a website where people liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural areas can express their <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> broadband services.<br />

The non-jurisdictional settlement of disputes between companies would also fall <strong>in</strong> the facilitation category. For<br />

example <strong>in</strong> Canada the regulator has set up a forum for <strong>in</strong>terested parties, with the help of its staff, to resolve<br />

local competition implementation issues of a technological, operational or adm<strong>in</strong>istrative nature; it also offers to<br />

mediate <strong>in</strong> case of conflicts. These are facilitation measures because the competence to make a b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

settlement depends on the will<strong>in</strong>gness of the companies to abide with decisions taken by the authority. This is<br />

different from traditional regulation where companies are subject to the decisions regardless of their consent.<br />

695<br />

SEC(2005) 717/2, Commission Staff Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper: Extended Impact Assessment of “i2010 – A European Information Society for<br />

growth and employment”, COM(2005) 229


Page 306 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The lack of formality and possibility to b<strong>in</strong>d third parties dist<strong>in</strong>guish facilitation from regulation. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

when a NRA decides to provide an <strong>in</strong>formation service which allows users to search for broadband access<br />

services by typ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their postal code, the NRA does not adopt a decision or order. Facilitation measures serve a<br />

very important function: They provide market <strong>in</strong>formation at no costs to the <strong>in</strong>dividual. Indeed, it is very costeffective<br />

if a NRA uses the <strong>in</strong>formation provided to it by communication companies to <strong>in</strong>crease market<br />

transparency - one of the core assumptions of perfect competition. Even more importantly, they do not impose<br />

economic costs on operators. There may be compliance costs – provid<strong>in</strong>g data -, but operators will not be<br />

obliged to take decisions which are not economically optimal.<br />

9.2.4.2 Regulation<br />

Regulation is a direct form of market <strong>in</strong>terference. Formally, regulation is characterized by its legal form and by<br />

its legal consequences. Generally, though the nomenclature differs from country to country, a dist<strong>in</strong>ction can be<br />

made between "decisions" b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g only parties <strong>in</strong> current proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, and "rules" which generally b<strong>in</strong>d third<br />

parties, provided the subject fulfils the conditions set out <strong>in</strong> the rule.<br />

In almost every country, regulation has been redesigned <strong>in</strong> order to promote competition <strong>in</strong> the telecom sector.<br />

Regulatory measures <strong>in</strong>clude obligations on <strong>in</strong>terconnection and local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g696 as well as other<br />

measures support<strong>in</strong>g new entrants <strong>in</strong> their competition with the <strong>in</strong>cumbent operators. Competition is often seen<br />

as the most important objective for regulation, s<strong>in</strong>ce more competition usually means lower prices and therefore<br />

higher demand, without <strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g the cost of subsidies or tax breaks. However, regulation also addresses<br />

consumer protection, universal service and <strong>in</strong>novation. Regulation of content deals with a number of new<br />

problems created by digitalisation and convergence of services. These <strong>in</strong>clude IPR, consumer protection with<br />

regard to e-commerce and e-payment etc.<br />

An important aspect of regulation is the way it is implemented by the NRA. Rules and decisions must be<br />

transparent, fair and free from political <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> order to attract new market players. Therefore the<br />

competence and the <strong>in</strong>dependence of the regulator is an important parameter. The draft<strong>in</strong>g of regulations and<br />

their implementation are highly controversial, s<strong>in</strong>ce they typically have an economic cost for at least some of the<br />

companies – <strong>in</strong>deed, if companies would behave by themselves as required by regulation, there would be no<br />

need for it. In addition, they are by necessity fairly detailed, for example on <strong>in</strong>terconnection pric<strong>in</strong>g. For these<br />

reasons, they have given rise to numerous disputes and will most likely cont<strong>in</strong>ue to do so. With<strong>in</strong> the EU, the<br />

implementation of the current regulatory framework is subject to an annual detailed report697 .<br />

9.2.4.3 Direct Intervention<br />

Direct market <strong>in</strong>tervention is a strong form of governmental market <strong>in</strong>terference. Essentially, direct <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />

means that public authorities are either provid<strong>in</strong>g the services themselves or pay for it to be provided. While <strong>in</strong><br />

all cases it will alter the market outcome – this is its purpose – it may or may not affect competition. For<br />

example, a public call for tenders to provide broadband to remote areas <strong>in</strong> exchange for subsidies will affect the<br />

outcome, because the village will have broadband access, but if properly done it will not advantage one operator<br />

unfairly over another. Public fund<strong>in</strong>g has the same objective as pro-competitive regulation, i.e. to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

demand by lower<strong>in</strong>g the price to the end user.<br />

Many government plans <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g i2010 and e-Japan stress that it is important that it is the private sector which<br />

takes the lead. The reality is however, that there are numerous examples of public fund<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

projects provid<strong>in</strong>g broadband. As seen <strong>in</strong> the country studies, some governments have provided fund<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

provision of broadband services <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> disadvantaged areas (e.g. Sweden, Canada) or <strong>in</strong>tend to do so<br />

(Poland, Slovenia etc.), and virtually all governments <strong>in</strong>tervene to provide broadband for schools, hospitals,<br />

libraries and research networks. However, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the country it may be regional authorities rather than<br />

the central government who take the lead (e.g. <strong>in</strong> the US).<br />

One problem of government fund<strong>in</strong>g to encourage the spread of broadband is the identification of groups of<br />

citizens which need this subsidy. The example of the Internet shows that many of the groups which were<br />

supposed to need special help managed perfectly without: first women were less onl<strong>in</strong>e than men, then they<br />

caught up; old people went onl<strong>in</strong>e much slower than young people, but then recovered a lot of that gap by<br />

themselves. In general terms, the adoption of successful new technologies follows an s-curve: the early adopters<br />

are followed by the bulk of the population, which <strong>in</strong> turn is followed by the latecomers. However, at the end,<br />

some parts of the population will rema<strong>in</strong> who need special assistance to acquire the new technology. Often, it is<br />

impossible to predict which group this will be exactly. This creates a dilemma for policymakers regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

696 see sub-section on competition<br />

697 The latest report is the 10 th annual implementation report of 2 December 2004, COM(2004) 759 f<strong>in</strong>al


Page 307 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

broadband: if they start f<strong>in</strong>ancial subsidies too early, it will boost their rank<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational comparison,<br />

because the bulk of the population will take up broadband more quickly, but for any given amount of subsidies,<br />

the long term penetration rate will rema<strong>in</strong> lower, because the available fund<strong>in</strong>g will not reach those parts of the<br />

population which would really need it.<br />

As mentioned above, governments therefore often concentrate their fund<strong>in</strong>g for broadband development on rural<br />

and remote areas, assum<strong>in</strong>g that the population liv<strong>in</strong>g there will be the group not gett<strong>in</strong>g broadband otherwise,<br />

while they suppose that other areas, <strong>in</strong> particular city areas, will be connected by market forces alone. However,<br />

some examples of successful government action, such as the ability to provide tax-free broadband connections<br />

to employees <strong>in</strong> Denmark, are not so precisely targeted. As expected, this has encouraged early take-up by the<br />

bulk of the population, but it is unlikely that it will help the neediest groups to acquire broadband. In general, tax<br />

exemptions as a form of government fund<strong>in</strong>g are more difficult to target, because they depend on estimates of<br />

who will take advantage of the offer, as opposed to direct fund<strong>in</strong>g, where the government can exactly def<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

beneficiaries.<br />

Support to content development is most often given through the development of public sector activities such as<br />

e-government, e-health, e-education and e-democracy. E-government <strong>in</strong>itiatives can be seen as a sort of direct<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> content production as the public produces its own content, which can stimulate demand for both<br />

content and <strong>in</strong>frastructure. Production of public content can also contribute to the upgrade of user competences<br />

and thus stimulate private content production. If the public sector out-sources parts of the content production,<br />

this will help creation of a private <strong>in</strong>dustry for content production<br />

A related k<strong>in</strong>d of support is f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g of educational content; this is done for <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>in</strong> South Korea. F<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />

the public authorities can also support development by upgrad<strong>in</strong>g competences and read<strong>in</strong>ess for new<br />

technologies through extensive tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programmes. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and education is important both for demand and<br />

supply, as both users and producers of broadband services can benefit from this. S<strong>in</strong>ce governments usually<br />

have a responsibility for education anyway, this is often not considered as a specific support measure. However,<br />

for example South Korea’s ICT tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for housewives, the military and disabled people (<strong>in</strong> addition to the<br />

more traditional elementary and middle schools) clearly went beyond standard education policy.<br />

9.2.4.4 Public policy: conclusion<br />

Public policies pretty much everywhere focus on the take-up of the available services – <strong>in</strong> other words, they<br />

foster demand. This makes a lot of sense, s<strong>in</strong>ce the reason<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d broadband strategies is that they allow the<br />

knowledge-based society to develop by connect<strong>in</strong>g all citizens. Supply <strong>in</strong> itself or to limited but profitable target<br />

groups is therefore not <strong>in</strong> the public <strong>in</strong>terest, but only supply which is widely taken up. Strategies to foster<br />

demand usually have two elements. Firstly, they attempt to lower the price to the consumer. This can be done by<br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g competition, via regulation and facilitation, or by f<strong>in</strong>ancial support, via direct subsidies or tax<br />

breaks. Secondly, they attempt to <strong>in</strong>crease the attractiveness of broadband, by content creation <strong>in</strong> public services<br />

such as e-government, e-health, e-democracy, and by tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for ICT skills, which enables consumers to use<br />

their connection better. Regulation, by encourag<strong>in</strong>g competition and therefore market<strong>in</strong>g and new services, can<br />

also contribute to <strong>in</strong>crease attractiveness.<br />

Facilitation Regulation Intervention<br />

Lower prices Market transparency<br />

Demand<br />

Competition: prices Tax breaks<br />

Increase<br />

attractiveness<br />

Foster <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />

Websites <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g potential<br />

demand<br />

Competition: market<strong>in</strong>g, new services<br />

Consumer protection<br />

Supply<br />

Unbundl<strong>in</strong>g Subsidies<br />

Table 59: Public policy tools<br />

e-gov, e-health… ICT<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

On the supply side, public policy can lower <strong>in</strong>vestment costs for new entrants through local loop unbundl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

requirements, while demand registration via websites reduces the risk <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> any roll-out decision. And<br />

where the prices required to make <strong>in</strong>vestment profitable for companies are too high for demand to be effective,<br />

e.g. <strong>in</strong> remote areas, subsidies and tax breaks can drive a wedge between the price to the operator, which<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s profitable, and the price to the consumer, which becomes affordable. However, such f<strong>in</strong>ancial support is<br />

limited by the availability of fund<strong>in</strong>g. How much fund<strong>in</strong>g is made available depends on the political choices of<br />

each country: on how much it th<strong>in</strong>ks is necessary, given its configuration and legacy situation, and on how much<br />

of a priority is accorded to broadband development.


9.3 Inhibitors<br />

Page 308 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Despite all the advantages of broadband, there are also some problems which broadband users have to<br />

overcome. The first relates to <strong>in</strong>tellectual property. Currently, a large part of the network traffic is peer-to-peer<br />

file shar<strong>in</strong>g, some of which concerns collaborative work<strong>in</strong>g and other legitimate uses, but most of which is<br />

download<strong>in</strong>g music, and, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly, movies over the Internet. For example, <strong>in</strong> Sweden up to 85%of a typical<br />

ISP’s capacity was recently estimated to be used for peer-to-peer file shar<strong>in</strong>g 698 . As the <strong>in</strong>tellectual property<br />

holders are gett<strong>in</strong>g ever more aggressive <strong>in</strong> pursu<strong>in</strong>g unauthorised download<strong>in</strong>g, this may reduce the<br />

attractiveness of broadband. At least the music <strong>in</strong>dustry has, after much resistance, recognised the potential of<br />

the Internet as a legitimate channel of distribution and set up its own offers, while the movie <strong>in</strong>dustry is not yet<br />

that advanced. In theory, paid music download<strong>in</strong>g should mean that peer-to-peer could cont<strong>in</strong>ue its growth, but<br />

while respect<strong>in</strong>g copyright. However, <strong>in</strong> practice the digital rights management systems tend to be very<br />

restrictive and are likely to reduce consumption unnecessarily. In any case, the payments to copyright holder<br />

will naturally reduce demand by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the cost of download<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

A second problem is security. The always-on character of broadband connections makes end-user mach<strong>in</strong>es<br />

visible to the Internet. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to some estimates, most spam mail is now sent by broadband-connected<br />

consumer mach<strong>in</strong>es that have been converted to mail generators and gateways us<strong>in</strong>g security holes. Automated<br />

scann<strong>in</strong>g tools enable systematic search of vulnerabilities <strong>in</strong> broadband-connected end-user mach<strong>in</strong>es, and<br />

several viruses have been created that do this without human <strong>in</strong>tervention. As the number of broadband users<br />

grows, there is no guarantee that their computer security competences would quickly improve. If end users<br />

realise that mach<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> their homes are used to send spam and viruses across the world, they may start to view<br />

broadband connections as harmful and dangerous. The psychological effect of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out that one’s personal<br />

computer has been maliciously converted <strong>in</strong>to unknown and perhaps illegal uses, and that outsiders have ga<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

perhaps complete access to files <strong>in</strong> the mach<strong>in</strong>e, is probably quite damag<strong>in</strong>g. Potential users may delay their<br />

decisions to acquire broadband connections and exist<strong>in</strong>g users may unplug the network when not <strong>in</strong> use,<br />

effectively giv<strong>in</strong>g up the always-on benefit.<br />

A related issue is that one important new use of broadband is the regular download<strong>in</strong>g of security patches for<br />

operat<strong>in</strong>g systems and application software. In the theoretical po<strong>in</strong>t where broadband is ma<strong>in</strong>ly used to<br />

download security updates that are needed because the connection is broadband (i.e. the end-user mach<strong>in</strong>e is<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uously connected to the net), the benefits of broadband could relatively easily become negative.<br />

698 Hadenius, P. (2004) Reliev<strong>in</strong>g peer-to-peer pressure. Technology Review, 25 February 2004


9.4 Conclusion<br />

Page 309 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Broadband development, as seen <strong>in</strong> the country studies <strong>in</strong> the previous chapter, is very uneven. Some countries<br />

are already advanced and cont<strong>in</strong>ue to grows fast (e.g. the Netherlands), other have barely started (Greece), yet<br />

others are fairly advanced but are experienc<strong>in</strong>g a sharp slow-down <strong>in</strong> growth (South Korea). These differences<br />

can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by many factors, rang<strong>in</strong>g from GDP per capita to broadband strategies. We have separated<br />

those factors which cannot directly be <strong>in</strong>fluenced by governments (e. g. population density, demographics) from<br />

those which can only be <strong>in</strong>fluenced <strong>in</strong> the long run (e.g. educat<strong>in</strong>g people to use broadband services) and those<br />

which can easily be <strong>in</strong>fluenced (e.g. sett<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>terconnection and access regulations by the NRA, fund<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

connect<strong>in</strong>g remote areas). Once the most effective levers of government action are identified, the ma<strong>in</strong> issue is<br />

how best to use these levers.<br />

Given the variety of country configurations and legacy situations <strong>in</strong> the countries we have looked at, it was not<br />

surpris<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>d that public policies have equalled varied enormously, even with<strong>in</strong> the EU, where a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ation exists. Clearly, a rich <strong>in</strong>ner city with multiple networks needs a different approach from a rural area<br />

with not even generalised telephone coverage. Countries which have many <strong>in</strong>ner cities therefore have other<br />

needs from countries which have many remote areas. Public broadband policy needs to be tailor-made for each<br />

country.<br />

If there is any common lesson, it is that strong competition is the foundation upon which complementary public<br />

measures can build. Ensur<strong>in</strong>g the right regulation for competition, is therefore the first step, which can then be<br />

followed by facilitation measures, both to <strong>in</strong>tensify competition and to facilitate demand, and by direct<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervention, where this is necessary. However, as always the key question is “where is this necessary”, for<br />

which there is unfortunately no s<strong>in</strong>gle universally-valid answer.


10. Broadband Applications and User Needs<br />

10.1 Introduction<br />

Page 310 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tention of the country studies was to identify socioeconomic factors that have an impact on supply and<br />

demand, to describe their country specific extension and to recommend measures that appear helpful to<br />

accomplish a BB4All System.<br />

However, one group of socioeconomic factors - also important for demand – is not taken <strong>in</strong> account with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

country studies. These factors concern end user criteria, particularly the adaptation of broadband applications to<br />

end user needs <strong>in</strong> terms of useability and usefulness. To describe the extent to which these criteria are fulfilled<br />

with<strong>in</strong> any European country would be far beyond the scope of the project: There would be no end to describe<br />

country specific extensions of shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs with regard to usefulness and usability.<br />

On that basis it appears reasonable to provide a cross sectional chapter on end user criteria that complements the<br />

country studies and is focussed on the follow<strong>in</strong>g questions:<br />

• Why should end users benefit from broadband applications? Without conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g answers to that<br />

question a necessary condition for sufficient demand is miss<strong>in</strong>g (see section 10.2).<br />

• To what extent are broadband applications already available or may be expected <strong>in</strong> the future?<br />

Answers to that question might help persons <strong>in</strong> charge to f<strong>in</strong>d out which type of broadband applications<br />

will probably cause demand and should therefore be offered (see section 10.3).<br />

• What reasons might threaten usability and usefulness of broadband applications (see section<br />

10.4)?<br />

• What measures are appropriate to avoid or elim<strong>in</strong>ate obstacles to a BB4All system from end<br />

users perspectives (see section 10.5)?<br />

10.2 Reasons why end users should benefit from broadband<br />

applications<br />

There are various reasons why high bandwidth can be beneficial for end users.<br />

10.2.1 High bandwidth as factor of efficiency and convenience of <strong>in</strong>ternet applications 699 .<br />

At present, many <strong>in</strong>ternet applications (see section 10.3) exist that may be used effectively on the basis of dialup<br />

connections, but may be used with much more efficiency and convenience if broadband access connections<br />

are available. Here at least three reasons are known why users benefit from an <strong>in</strong>crease of bandwidth as <strong>in</strong> case<br />

of DSL.<br />

• High download / upload capacity: Most current broadband end-user traffic is now generated by shar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

music and video files among the users. Peer-to-peer systems would typically be unfeasible without enduser<br />

broadband access.<br />

• Fast response time: Currently, <strong>in</strong>formation search is one of the most important uses of the Internet. In<br />

this function the users typically click through several pages and converge towards the <strong>in</strong>formation they<br />

are search<strong>in</strong>g. Fast response time makes it possible for the user to quickly see if the associations he is<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g actually lead to the required <strong>in</strong>formation. Fast response time, therefore, considerably adds<br />

value to the Internet.<br />

• Always-on: The immediate availability of <strong>in</strong>ternet content and communication capabilities are<br />

considered to be important benefits of broadband access. The always-on characteristic of current<br />

broadband connections depends, however, also on pric<strong>in</strong>g; broadband access typically has flat<br />

connection fees, and there is no need to switch the connection off when it is not used. The rapid<br />

diffusion of broadband <strong>in</strong> Korea, for example, is to a large extent expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that for average<br />

usage time narrowband dial-up costs would exceed broadband subscription costs. Always-on, therefore,<br />

699 Illka Tuomi. Application szenarios for BREAD, IRC-IPTS Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, IPTS, July 2004


Page 311 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

depends on both the connection boot-up time, which is a technical characteristic, and pric<strong>in</strong>g that makes<br />

always-on economically attractive and possible for the user.<br />

As broadband can transmit more bits the three benefits above particularly arise <strong>in</strong> cases<br />

• when providers supply rich multimedia content that improves the user experience and also<br />

• when end-users themselves want to provide bit-<strong>in</strong>tensive content such as digital images, audio and<br />

video files.<br />

10.2.2 High bandwidth as necessary prerequisite for effective use of applications:<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>gly applications exist or may be expected <strong>in</strong> the future that depend on high bandwidth as a necessary<br />

prerequisite for their effective use. That is the case when rich multimedia content is <strong>in</strong>volved and<br />

• delays of response times cannot be tolerated, e.g. real life video communication and onl<strong>in</strong>e gam<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

• applications depend on jitter-free visual representation of temporal sequences without distortion e.g.<br />

when one is watch<strong>in</strong>g sport events, performances or animal behaviour.<br />

10.3 Extent to which broadband applications are already available or<br />

may be expected <strong>in</strong> future<br />

This topic needs attention because, as was already stated above (see 10.1), know<strong>in</strong>g present and potential future<br />

broadband applications might help to f<strong>in</strong>d out which type of broadband applications will probably cause demand<br />

and should therefore be developed and offered.<br />

Basically one can benefit from both narrowband and broadband applications <strong>in</strong> all areas of private, bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<br />

societal life. Thus goal atta<strong>in</strong>ment may be supported by applications (see EU project PROFIT700 ) <strong>in</strong> areas of<br />

• Communications/Messag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Leisure/Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />

• Collaboration /Telework<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• e-Government<br />

• Safety/Location based<br />

• Live <strong>in</strong>dependently/Health<br />

• F<strong>in</strong>ancial security/F<strong>in</strong>ancial services<br />

• Data across the web/Information services<br />

• Quality of life/monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Benefitt<strong>in</strong>g from the above applications is possible, at least partially, on the basis of narrowband dial-up access.<br />

Therefore the questions arises - as emphasised <strong>in</strong> the headl<strong>in</strong>e of this section - : Which types of presently<br />

available or future applications will benefit most from broadband access?<br />

10.3.1 Available applications benefit<strong>in</strong>g from broadband access because of high efficiency<br />

and convenience<br />

As was claimed above (see 10.2) many Internet applications are available which may be used effectively on the<br />

basis of dial-up connections, but which nonetheless may be used with much more efficiency and convenience if<br />

broadband access connections are available. Evidence for this is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by statistical results concern<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

use of broadband access with European and non European states. One illustration of this is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> an<br />

American study 701 . The emphasis of the study was to f<strong>in</strong>d out whether Internet use by Home Broadband Users<br />

differs from Dial-Up Users. The results are based on Telephone <strong>in</strong>terviews with 507 Broadband users and 1391<br />

Dial-Up users. Broadband users, also called high-speed users - were def<strong>in</strong>ed as users who either had cable<br />

modems or digital subscriber l<strong>in</strong>e (DSL) service.<br />

700<br />

P1302, PROFIT: Potential pRofit Opportunities <strong>in</strong> the Future ambient InTelligence world -Strategic bus<strong>in</strong>ess models for the new<br />

economy- , March 2004<br />

701<br />

Pew Internet & American Life <strong>Project</strong> (2002). The Broadband Difference: How onl<strong>in</strong>e Americans` behaviour changes with high-speed<br />

Internet connections at home. http://www.pew<strong>in</strong>ternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband_Report.pdf


Page 312 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

From the study it is evident that broadband users are us<strong>in</strong>g more frequently and extensively a variety of<br />

applications that are also used on the basis of dial-up narrowband access. Thus “the average Internet user with<br />

high-speed home access does 7 th<strong>in</strong>gs onl<strong>in</strong>e on a typical day, such as gett<strong>in</strong>g news, health care <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

tak<strong>in</strong>g an onl<strong>in</strong>e course, listen<strong>in</strong>g to music, or download<strong>in</strong>g files (see Figure 115). By contrast, a dial-up user<br />

does about 3 th<strong>in</strong>gs onl<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g a typical day onl<strong>in</strong>e. The high-speed connection permits broadband users to<br />

perform multiple Internet tasks more easily <strong>in</strong> a given onl<strong>in</strong>e session or at different times of the day.”<br />

Figure 115 An Average Day for Broadband Users 702<br />

Additionally “Broadband Internet users are much more likely than dial-up users to be onl<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g a typical<br />

day. Fully 82% of broadband Internet surfers are onl<strong>in</strong>e on any given day, compared to 58% of dial-up users.<br />

702 Source: Home Broadband Users, Pew Internet & American Life <strong>Project</strong> February 2002 Survey, Internet users, n=507; marg<strong>in</strong> of error is<br />

±4%. Dial-Up Users, August-September 2001 Survey, n=1391; marg<strong>in</strong> of error is ±3%.


Page 313 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

They spend more time onl<strong>in</strong>e than dial-up users (95 m<strong>in</strong>utes on average for high-speed users dur<strong>in</strong>g any given<br />

day, compared to 83 m<strong>in</strong>utes for dial-up).”<br />

As mentioned above, the study reported is related to patterns of network use <strong>in</strong> the U.S.<br />

Anyway it appears that the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed basically are also valid for various European countries <strong>in</strong> which<br />

similar though less extensive studies 703,704,705 are performed with outcomes comparable to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />

U.S. study.<br />

An application that particularly appears to be a driver of broadband networks 706 is Voice over Internet Protocol<br />

(VoIP). VoIP “is a common term that refers to the different protocols that are used to transport real-time voice<br />

and the necessary signal<strong>in</strong>g by means of Internet Protocol (IP).” 707 In another word, it allows the user to place a<br />

call over IP networks.<br />

Broadband access enables through always-on access prices and near flat fees for volume consumption a<br />

attractive use of VoIP. Arthur D. Little forecasts, that “Voice over IP is proliferat<strong>in</strong>g fast and is expected to be<br />

one of the most widely used applications on the Internet by 2010, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a penetration of over 70 percent of<br />

Broadband households <strong>in</strong> mature Broadband markets.” 708 AT&T expect to have 1 million customers by the end<br />

of 2005. 709<br />

10.3.2 Available applications benefit<strong>in</strong>g from high bandwidth as necessary prerequisite for<br />

their effective use<br />

As is evident from the above study, most present broadband adopters use high-speed connections to perform<br />

typical <strong>in</strong>ternet activities faster710 . There are only some results concern<strong>in</strong>g applications that <strong>in</strong>clude real<br />

broadband contents, i.e. contents that are to be transmitted <strong>in</strong> real time to allow their successful use. Typical<br />

examples of such broadband content applications are <strong>in</strong>teractive video, stream<strong>in</strong>g, video telephony, video- and<br />

multipo<strong>in</strong>t-conferenc<strong>in</strong>g, enterta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g onl<strong>in</strong>e games, and additionally, e-health, e-commerce, elearn<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

telecommut<strong>in</strong>g and remote office applications, provided that the latter applications <strong>in</strong>clude the retrieval<br />

and transmission particularly of video and still images. However these applications can not claim to meet a high<br />

market demand at present.<br />

Instead it is not clear whether the provision of higher bandwidth (particularly beyond DSL) <strong>in</strong> the sense of a<br />

BB4All system provision will meet a market demand that justifies necessary <strong>in</strong>vestments. As is stated <strong>in</strong> a study<br />

of Sage Research711 “Most people seem to believe that the potential for significant markets exists – but up to<br />

now, little hard data existed that identified the size or the source of the opportunity”. On that background a<br />

survey of U.S. households was conducted by Sage Research <strong>in</strong> December 2001 “to quantify <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>, and<br />

will<strong>in</strong>gness to pay for, Internet-delivered services”. For that “600 telephone <strong>in</strong>terviews were conducted with<br />

consumers <strong>in</strong> the U.S. Participants were qualified to ensure representation of U.S. households.” The variety of<br />

broadband services taken <strong>in</strong>to account was classified accord<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g Categories712 :<br />

• Enterta<strong>in</strong>ment <strong>in</strong>cludes simulation games, kids’ activity site, TV show simulations, music libraries,<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e gambl<strong>in</strong>g, TV shows on demand, movies on demand, concerts, and cultural events.<br />

• Communications <strong>in</strong>cludes videoconferenc<strong>in</strong>g, unified messag<strong>in</strong>g for personal purposes, and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational long distance/telephone.<br />

703 Office of the e-Envoy (2001). “UK onl<strong>in</strong>e: the broadband future.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available: http://www.eenvoy.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/00/08/25/04000825.pdf<br />

[17.3.04].<br />

704 Ziff Davis Publish<strong>in</strong>g Hold<strong>in</strong>gs Inc. Reproduction (2002). “The Survey.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://www.pcmag.com/pr<strong>in</strong>t_article/0,1761,a=21056,00.asp [17.3.04].<br />

705 Carrière, R, Rose, J., Sirois, L., Turcotte, N. and Zabbal, C. (2000). “Broadband changes everyth<strong>in</strong>g.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://www.mck<strong>in</strong>sey.de/_downloads/knowmatters/telecommunications/broadband_changes.pdf [17.3.04].<br />

706 Wayne Fonteix – AT&T (2004). Voice over Internet Protocol: Pick<strong>in</strong>g up the Pace. http://ipu.msu.edu/IPU-Onl<strong>in</strong>e/documents/Voip04-<br />

Fonteix.pdf<br />

707 Rappoport, P.N., Taylor, L.D., and Kridel, D.J. & Alleman, J. (2004) Estimat<strong>in</strong>g the Demand for Voice over IP Services.<br />

http://userpage.fu-berl<strong>in</strong>.de/~jmueller/itsnew/abstracts/Abstracts/alleman8.pdf<br />

708 Arthur D. Little (2005). Global Broadband Report. http://www.flarion.com/viewpo<strong>in</strong>t/reports/ADLittleBroadbandUpdate2005.pdf<br />

709 Wayne Fonteix – AT&T (2004). Voice over Internet Protocol: Pick<strong>in</strong>g up the Pace. http://ipu.msu.edu/IPU-Onl<strong>in</strong>e/documents/Voip04-<br />

Fonteix.pdf<br />

710 Pew Internet & American Life <strong>Project</strong> (2002). The Broadband Difference: How onl<strong>in</strong>e Americans` behaviour changes with high-speed<br />

Internet connections at home. http://www.pew<strong>in</strong>ternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband_Report.pdf<br />

711 Sage Research, Inc. (2002). “Customers at the Gate: Mount<strong>in</strong>g Demand for Broadband-enabled Services.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/tln/pdf/bband_f<strong>in</strong>al.pdf<br />

712 Sage Research, Inc. (2002). “Customers at the Gate: Mount<strong>in</strong>g Demand for Broadband-enabled Services.” [Onl<strong>in</strong>e]. Available:<br />

http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/tln/pdf/bband_f<strong>in</strong>al.pdf


Page 314 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

• Education <strong>in</strong>cludes language education, music education, cook<strong>in</strong>g education, cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g education, and<br />

multimedia encyclopaedias.<br />

• Medical/health <strong>in</strong>cludes video monitor<strong>in</strong>g of a child’s day care, video monitor<strong>in</strong>g of an older relative’s<br />

care facility, and home health monitor<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Hobbies <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>terior decorat<strong>in</strong>g services, multimedia sports fan service, multimedia cook<strong>in</strong>g<br />

lovers’ service, multimedia fitness enthusiasts’ service, and access to religious services/resources.<br />

• Personal/professional services <strong>in</strong>cludes onl<strong>in</strong>e clothes shopp<strong>in</strong>g service, counsel<strong>in</strong>g/psychiatric<br />

services, legal advice, marriage/parent<strong>in</strong>g advice, home/auto care advice, multimedia travel plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment advice, onl<strong>in</strong>e dat<strong>in</strong>g service, and onl<strong>in</strong>e photo edit<strong>in</strong>g/pr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g/storage service.<br />

• Telework/work <strong>in</strong>cludes access to an employer’s network and unified messag<strong>in</strong>g for work purposes.<br />

From the many results obta<strong>in</strong>ed by the study only the most important f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are reported. As it appears from<br />

Figure 116 most of the service categories are of <strong>in</strong>terest for a rather high portion of the U.S. population.<br />

However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the authors one has to be cautious when <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g the results, because what people say<br />

may not agree with what people do. In particular, to rely on the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed implies a couple of risks e.g.<br />

various discrepancies between expected and supplied broadband services. Anyway, the study is a useful step on<br />

the way to answer the question whether it is reasonable to provide a faster technology and broadband<br />

applications.<br />

Figure 116: User Interests <strong>in</strong> Broadband Applications


10.3.3 Potential future applications benefit<strong>in</strong>g from high bandwidth 713<br />

Page 315 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

“Many scenarios for future <strong>in</strong>formation environments have been developed where broadband access is<br />

important. 714 It seems that the scenarios have not particularly focused on the requirements for broadband<br />

architectures. BREAD will therefore need to further develop exist<strong>in</strong>g scenarios. Some prelim<strong>in</strong>ary start<strong>in</strong>g<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts for the scenarios can, however, be described. These basically cover the well-known prototype visions of<br />

the future broadband, aga<strong>in</strong> from the end-user po<strong>in</strong>t of view. In addition, we will need scenarios for bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

use, etc.<br />

Virtual Hollywood<br />

Many early discussions on broadband perceived it as a broadcast medium that will deliver hundreds of television<br />

channels to the end users, and provide new enterta<strong>in</strong>ment services. This application model can be implemented<br />

<strong>in</strong> several alternative ways, basically by mak<strong>in</strong>g trade-offs between storage and transmission capacity. The<br />

essential characteristic of this model is that the bit stream is heavily asymmetric. Virtual Hollywood, therefore,<br />

relies on storage network architectures. 715<br />

Peer-to-peer grid<br />

Peer-to-peer applications put the content either at the edge of the network, or on distributed servers. A full peerto-peer<br />

architecture, without dedicated servers, would create high-bandwidth connections among end-users.<br />

Theoretically, this would lead to an exponential growth of the required backbone capacity. If, for example, the<br />

end users would be given broadband capacity and they actually would use it, the current <strong>in</strong>ternet architecture<br />

would collapse. A practical experiment, <strong>in</strong> fact, is currently go<strong>in</strong>g on, as spam mailers and virus developers have<br />

started to use distributed broadband capability to test the limits of the current architecture.<br />

Proximal work<br />

Also paradoxically known as “remote work” and “telework”. When people work <strong>in</strong> knowledge and <strong>in</strong>formation<strong>in</strong>tensive<br />

tasks at the location where they are, <strong>in</strong>stead of mov<strong>in</strong>g to remote work locations, <strong>in</strong>formation needs to<br />

move where the people are. The potential benefits of broadband-enabled work<strong>in</strong>g are well known. From the<br />

organisational po<strong>in</strong>t of view, telework can be important for cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs—a factor that has been driv<strong>in</strong>g the rapid<br />

growth of call-centres—but it can also provide access to skills and local knowledge that can not be concentrated<br />

<strong>in</strong> any specific geographical po<strong>in</strong>t. Whereas transaction <strong>in</strong>formation can easily be transmitted us<strong>in</strong>g narrow-band<br />

connections, <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>tensive work (such as call centres) and knowledge <strong>in</strong>tensive collaboration (e.g.,<br />

product development, market<strong>in</strong>g, etc.) require higher transmission capacity. As firms are start<strong>in</strong>g to understand<br />

how distributed collaboration and computer-supported location <strong>in</strong>dependent work needs to be organised and<br />

managed, broadband technologies will be widely used for this purpose. This application model will require highspeed<br />

symmetric transmission (global video meet<strong>in</strong>gs) and fast and secure access to corporate networks (VPN).<br />

Different architecture models could be built if the model would be based on smart or stupid term<strong>in</strong>als (local<br />

storage may, for example, create security problems that are easier to solve with VPN/SAN architectures).<br />

Ambient <strong>in</strong>telligence<br />

The ambient <strong>in</strong>telligence scenarios lead to architectures where personalised <strong>in</strong>formation and communication is<br />

available <strong>in</strong>dependent of location, and where local <strong>in</strong>formation systems can be used to create adaptive and<br />

context-sensitive user environments. The scenarios imply that the <strong>in</strong>frastructure <strong>in</strong>cludes extensive sensor<br />

networks, <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>telligent agents, and services can be accessed <strong>in</strong>dependent of location. Potentially, this<br />

application scenario would mean that the use of applications is likewise completely <strong>in</strong>dependent of the place of<br />

use and configured us<strong>in</strong>g local resources and knowledge.<br />

Sensor networks<br />

Although sensors typically generate only few data, potentially the number of data generation po<strong>in</strong>ts can become<br />

very large <strong>in</strong> the future. In particular, the movement of goods and cars will generate a constant stream of sensor<br />

data, and the constructed <strong>in</strong>frastructures will be monitored with potentially vast number of sensors. 716<br />

713 This section is extracted from a paper written by Illka Tuomi <strong>in</strong> the context of the BREAD project (Literaturh<strong>in</strong>weis)<br />

714 Illka Tuomi. Application szenarios for BREAD, IRC-IPTS Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, IPTS, July 2004<br />

715 See the IBM System Journal special issue on storage network architectures and their expected evolution at<br />

http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj42-2.html.<br />

716 See, for example, the Californian CITRIS project that aims to develop societal-scale <strong>in</strong>formation systems, such as massively networked<br />

disaster recovery, environment management, and smart traffic systems: http://www.citris.berkeley.edu/about_citris/


Page 316 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

10.4 Reasons that threaten usability and usefulness of broadband<br />

applications<br />

Even if all of the above present and potential future applications would be available to all end users this would<br />

not ensure their acceptance, use and sufficient demand. For that some other prerequisites have to be met, among<br />

them usability and usefulness as two substantial factors.<br />

The concept of usability: There are various def<strong>in</strong>itions of usability. One def<strong>in</strong>ition adopted by many experts is<br />

the one supplied by ISO. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to ISO9241/11 (1992) 717 usability is def<strong>in</strong>ed as the "extent to which a<br />

product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction<br />

<strong>in</strong> a specified context of use". The ISO usability components are def<strong>in</strong>ed as follows:<br />

• Effectiveness: "The accuracy and completeness with which specified users can achieve specified goals<br />

<strong>in</strong> particular environments".<br />

• Efficiency: "The resources expended <strong>in</strong> relation to the accuracy and completeness of goals achieved."<br />

• Satisfaction: "The comfort and acceptability of the work system to its users and other people affected<br />

by its use".<br />

There are other def<strong>in</strong>itions, e.g. by ETSI718 or Nielsen719 . The ETSI def<strong>in</strong>ition ma<strong>in</strong>ly adopts the ISO720 def<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

but excludes monetary costs as aspect of efficiency. It additionally emphasizes the flexibility of a system, i.e. the<br />

degree of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g usability when user category, task, or environment are varied. Other def<strong>in</strong>itions (e.g.<br />

Nielsen721 ) <strong>in</strong>clude dimensions as learnability or memorability of system features as ma<strong>in</strong> components of<br />

usability. However, apart from some differences <strong>in</strong> present def<strong>in</strong>itions of usability all experts apparently would<br />

consider a system usable that can be used with success, ease, and fun. This can be regarded the core <strong>in</strong>tension of<br />

the various def<strong>in</strong>itions of usability. F<strong>in</strong>ally, it is to be stressed that although the concept of usability is not<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed homogeneously its practical value is doubtless: The exist<strong>in</strong>g concepts help to focus the attention to<br />

attributes of use that are relevant from the user´s perspective and have an effect on their acceptance of<br />

applications of Information and Communications Technology.<br />

Problems of usability<br />

They result when basic components of user <strong>in</strong>terfaces as<br />

• <strong>in</strong>put devices<br />

• output devices,<br />

• organisation of the man-mach<strong>in</strong>e dialog and<br />

• orientation and support tools<br />

are not adapted to goals of user groups or to the context of use. Usability deficits particularly result when the<br />

above user <strong>in</strong>terface components are not adapted to sensorimotor skills, perceptual skills, <strong>in</strong>formation-process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

skills and previous knowledge.<br />

Below some mayor usability problems of present applications are illustrated:<br />

• Problems of word<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Problems of orientation<br />

• Problems of functionalities<br />

• Problems of m<strong>in</strong>iaturisation of <strong>in</strong>put- and output devices <strong>in</strong> case of mobile applications,<br />

• Problems of adaptation to different user groups<br />

• Problems result<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g complexity,<br />

717<br />

ISO/FDIS 9241-11, "Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display term<strong>in</strong>als (VDTs)- Part 11: Guidance on usability",<br />

1992<br />

718<br />

ETSI DTR/HF 3001, “Guide for usability evaluations of telecommunications systems and services”, 1993<br />

719<br />

J. Nielsen, "Usability eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g", Academic Press (AP Professional), 1993<br />

720<br />

ISO/FDIS 9241-11, "Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display term<strong>in</strong>als (VDTs)- Part 11: Guidance on usability",<br />

1992<br />

721<br />

J. Nielsen, "Usability eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g", Academic Press (AP Professional), 1993


Page 317 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

Problems of word<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Usability of broadband applications heavily depends on appropriate word<strong>in</strong>g and icons that are selected to<br />

convey the mean<strong>in</strong>g of menu options, feedback <strong>in</strong>formation and <strong>in</strong>structions how to use an application. However<br />

it is evident from many usability evaluations that ambiguous word<strong>in</strong>g causes severe problems of understand<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

thus caus<strong>in</strong>g usability shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Problems of orientation<br />

Usability depends on orientation of what one may expect from a platform or application and where one may f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

it. Orientation tools such as sitemaps, <strong>in</strong>troductions, menus or search eng<strong>in</strong>es are supplied quite often, however<br />

not always realized <strong>in</strong> an appropriate way. Here are some illustrations of this type of problem:<br />

• In many cases available orientation tools do not provide sufficient <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> advance what<br />

capacities and performance are supplied and which ones are beyond of the scope of a platform.<br />

• In case of search eng<strong>in</strong>es numerous answers are supplied that require an unacceptable patience and time<br />

to identify useful l<strong>in</strong>ks. This still is true, despite the fact that meanwhile sophisticated search algorithms<br />

are be<strong>in</strong>g implemented (e.g. by us<strong>in</strong>g Bool´s logic)<br />

• When us<strong>in</strong>g an option e.g. to book a theatre ticket, one needs to know <strong>in</strong> advance what requirements are<br />

to be met to take advantage of a service, e.g. whether on needs a user-ID, a password or a PIN-code.<br />

Such orientation functions are usually not available.<br />

• Often <strong>in</strong>formation on the last actions performed is important to complete a task. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong> many<br />

cases orientation tools called “history” are supplied, however they lack usability.<br />

Problems of functionalities<br />

Usability is impaired by <strong>in</strong>appropriate functionalities. An illustration of this problem is an electronic form that<br />

requires to be filled <strong>in</strong> completely anew if the user made a small spell<strong>in</strong>g mistake when writ<strong>in</strong>g a word. Here a<br />

function is needed that would allow to correct a letter without open<strong>in</strong>g a new blank electronic form.<br />

Problems of m<strong>in</strong>iaturization<br />

It is obvious that there is a grow<strong>in</strong>g trend to enable access to applications by mobiles that orig<strong>in</strong>ally were<br />

developed for stationary or desktop term<strong>in</strong>als. However the mobile use of such applications normally is not<br />

possible by the same means and tools that proved of value <strong>in</strong> case of stationary term<strong>in</strong>als.<br />

Particularly the follow<strong>in</strong>g problems are not solved satisfactorily:<br />

• Both <strong>in</strong>put- and output devices suffer from m<strong>in</strong>iaturization.<br />

• Well proved dialog structures and orientation tools may not be applied <strong>in</strong> case of mobile applications<br />

because of the m<strong>in</strong>iaturisation of displays<br />

Problems of adaptation to different user groups<br />

One severe usability problem results from the fact that applications and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g user <strong>in</strong>terfaces are not<br />

adapted to user groups, their previous knowledge and competencies. This is especially true with regard to people<br />

with special needs.<br />

Problems result<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g complexity<br />

With <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g variety of applications, <strong>in</strong>put and output devices and contexts of use, a complexity arises that<br />

implies stra<strong>in</strong> for the user. This results from the fact that new applications quite often require to learn new rules<br />

how to use them. This could be avoided by creat<strong>in</strong>g generic user <strong>in</strong>terfaces. This idea is based on the assumption<br />

that user <strong>in</strong>terfaces may be organized <strong>in</strong> an application <strong>in</strong>dependent, thus generic way. This appears possible to a<br />

certa<strong>in</strong> extent with regard to <strong>in</strong>put- and output modalities as well as the visual and spatial organisation of menu<br />

structures, feedback and orientation tools. However generic approaches are only partially or <strong>in</strong>adequately<br />

realised by now.<br />

At the end of this section the topic of a lack of usefulness needs to be mentioned. Even if an application is usable<br />

this does not necessarily imply its usefulness. An application is supposed to be useful, if it assists a user to<br />

accomplish those goals satisfactorily by which the service use is motivated. If for <strong>in</strong>stance a user knows how to<br />

use a search eng<strong>in</strong>e, but the search eng<strong>in</strong>e does not conta<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>formation which the user is look<strong>in</strong>g for the<br />

search eng<strong>in</strong>e actually is not useful. Thus applications might not be useful because they do not supply the<br />

particular <strong>in</strong>formation units needed or the media (text, stills, mov<strong>in</strong>g images, sound...) that are necessary to<br />

fulfill the needs of end users successfully.


Page 318 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

10.5 Measures to ensure usability and usefulness as prerequisites of<br />

demand for broadband applications<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>gly measures and methods are developed and used to ensure usability and usefulness of ICT devices<br />

and applications. They are subsumed under the term Usability Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, an approach that is performed as a<br />

part of the product and service development process. The related term “user (or human)-centred design”<br />

emphasizes the cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>volvement of users dur<strong>in</strong>g all phases of the development process. No matter which<br />

term is used, most human factors experts agree on the many activities necessary to establish usefulness and<br />

usability of ICT devices and applications. One proposal to arrange the activities is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ISO/DIS<br />

13407722 and depicted <strong>in</strong> Figure 117. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to ISO user centred design implies to<br />

• understand and specify the context of use.<br />

• specify the user requirements and organisational requirements.<br />

• produce design solutions and<br />

• evaluate designs aga<strong>in</strong>st requirements.<br />

Figure 117: Human - Centred Design Activities (see ISO/DIS 13407)<br />

Thus <strong>in</strong> the framework of the user centred design approach the context of use should be described <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

• the characteristics of the <strong>in</strong>tended users: habits, skills, knowledge, physical attributes,<br />

• features of the tasks performed by the users <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong> considered: task goals, task frequency etc,<br />

• characteristics of the environment of use, such as hardware, software, materials to be used or attributes<br />

of physical environment.<br />

The specification of user and organisational requirements encompasses statements on<br />

• f<strong>in</strong>ancial restrictions,<br />

• relevant statutory or legislative requests,<br />

• demands for co-operation and communication between users and other relevant parties,<br />

• requirements for the well-be<strong>in</strong>g of the users that are relevant, for <strong>in</strong>stance, to their safety, health and<br />

motivation.<br />

Methods used for specify<strong>in</strong>g the context of use and the user-/organisational requirements encompass<br />

bra<strong>in</strong>storm<strong>in</strong>g, group discussions, observations, focus groups, <strong>in</strong>terviews, document analysis, task analysis etc.<br />

722 ISO/DIS 13407, "Human-centred design processes for <strong>in</strong>teractive systems", 1997


Page 319 of 319<br />

<strong>FP6</strong>-<strong>IST</strong>-<strong>507554</strong>/JCP/R/Pub/D2.2-3.2<br />

On the basis of the requirements analysis design solutions are produced, which can be tested by means of<br />

simulations, models, or mock-ups.<br />

The evaluation process aims at assess<strong>in</strong>g whether user and organisational objectives have been met and at<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g proposals for improvement. For usability evaluation various methods can be considered. In user tests<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly performance (objective) and attitude (subjective) measures are obta<strong>in</strong>ed. This can be accomplished by<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g techniques such as th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g aloud, questionnaires, <strong>in</strong>terviews and audio and video record<strong>in</strong>g. Expert<br />

evaluations are appropriate when the task is to test whether the design of products and services corresponds to<br />

relevant Human Factors f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, standards or features known from “best practice” solutions. Methods used here<br />

are known as cognitive walkthrough, as heuristic evaluation, and also as checklist approach. Which methods are<br />

the most appropriate under the given circumstances depends on cost/benefit considerations or on anticipated<br />

consequences result<strong>in</strong>g from miss<strong>in</strong>g usability faults.<br />

Altogether the human-centred design process is a multi-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary approach <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g programmers, system<br />

analysts, application doma<strong>in</strong> specialists, user <strong>in</strong>terface designers, human factors and ergonomics experts,<br />

managers, purchasers and last but not least end users.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!