+IMPACT MAGAZINE ISSUE 23
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THOUGHT LEADERSHIP<br />
THOUGHT LEADERSHIP<br />
COMPUTATIONAL<br />
DESIGN:<br />
revolutionising the way we work<br />
Thanks to computer simulations and modelling techniques – as well as data-driven<br />
analyses – design teams can now create sustainable, energy-efficient and comfortable<br />
buildings for their occupants.<br />
WORDS Yogesh Gooljar IMAGES PJC + Partners<br />
Computational design and data-driven analyses<br />
have transformed the way architects, engineers<br />
and construction professionals approach<br />
building design. Fluid shapes, automation and<br />
robotics have changed the construction scene for the better<br />
– or for worse. Building designers are no longer satisfied<br />
with creating designs: they want data. Computational<br />
design can give them both of these and more.<br />
Fluid shapes, automation and robotics<br />
have changed the construction scene<br />
for the better – or for worse.<br />
Solar radiation analysis on a building facade to test shading strategies.<br />
DIRECT VS<br />
COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING<br />
Conventional modelling in software such as SketchUp, 3ds<br />
Max and Revit is known as direct modelling. No algorithms<br />
or parameters for design iteration are involved.<br />
To work with computational modelling, add-ons<br />
and plugins are necessary to enhance the functionality<br />
of the software. For example, Revit offers Dynamo and<br />
Rhino.Inside.Revit as computational features.<br />
Building designers are no longer<br />
satisfied with creating designs:<br />
they want data.<br />
An analysis of the potential for natural ventilation from location-based climate data.<br />
Computational design is being used to<br />
create sustainable, energy-efficient and<br />
comfortable buildings and spaces.<br />
An example of visual programming in Grasshopper for computational design.<br />
BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
Computational design tools have now merged with<br />
numerous building performance-analysis and simulation<br />
tools, enabling designers to analyse their design based on<br />
environmental performance indicators.<br />
An assessment of the annual solar radiation for Cape Town provides insight into climate-responsive architecture.<br />
THE EVOLUTION OF<br />
COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN<br />
The roots of computational design and building<br />
performance modelling can be traced back to the early<br />
days of computer-aided design (CAD) in the 1960s. In the<br />
following decades, computer technology evolved, and new<br />
tools emerged that allowed architects and engineers to<br />
create digital models of their designs. One of the earliest<br />
examples of building performance modelling was the<br />
use of energy modelling software in the 1980s to predict<br />
a building’s energy consumption.<br />
In the 1990s, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) allowed<br />
designers to simulate airflows and thermal conditions<br />
within buildings, giving a more accurate representation of<br />
the building’s performance. With the advent of parametric<br />
and generative design in the 2000s, designers could now<br />
create complex geometries and optimise their designs for<br />
specific environmental conditions.<br />
URBAN PLANNING & NEW NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN<br />
Data-driven analysis at an urban level for testing energy use intensity (EUI) for multiple<br />
typology mixes on a proposed site.<br />
FAR: 0.55<br />
FAR: 0.55<br />
Mean EUI: 320kWh/m 2 Mean EUI: 251kWh/m 2<br />
Program: Residential 70% • Commercial 30% Program: Residential 50% • Commercial 50%<br />
FAR: 1.55<br />
FAR: 0.55<br />
Mean EUI: 226kWh/m 2 Mean EUI: 381kWh/m 2<br />
Program: Residential 40% • Commercial 60%<br />
Program: Residential 30% • Commercial 70%<br />
ESTIMATED ENERGY INTENSITY<br />
40 POSITIVE IMPACT <strong>ISSUE</strong> <strong>23</strong><br />
POSITIVE IMPACT <strong>ISSUE</strong> <strong>23</strong><br />
41