You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
lmtimes.ca • Last Mountain Times • Monday, <strong>May</strong> 8, <strong>20</strong>23<br />
NFL QBs on the move,<br />
and getting rich<br />
There is no higher profile position in North American sports than the<br />
quarterback of a National Football League team.Today we’ll look at three of<br />
them — one coming, one going, and one who was in limbo but is now in the<br />
chips.<br />
April 29, <strong>20</strong>23<br />
In the ‘coming’ category is former<br />
Alabama star Bryce Young,<br />
chosen first overall in the<br />
late-April NFL draft by the Carolina<br />
Panthers. It was a controversial<br />
pick, because Young, who won the<br />
Heisman Trophy in <strong><strong>20</strong>22</strong> as the best<br />
player in U.S. college football, stands<br />
only 5-foot-10 and teams usually<br />
like their QBs to be tall (6-foot-3 or<br />
more) so they can easily see over<br />
the line of scrimmage. But Young’s<br />
play-making ability, quick reaction,<br />
and strong arm have made general<br />
managers believe that he could<br />
be another Drew Brees or Russell<br />
Wilson, height-challenged quarterbacks<br />
who starred in the NFL. The<br />
Panthers’ choice apparently came<br />
down to Young or the 6-foot-3<br />
C.J. Stroud, whose Ohio<br />
State Buckeyes lost in<br />
From<br />
the<br />
Sidelines<br />
BRUCE<br />
PENTON<br />
the college football<br />
semi-final last season.<br />
Caroline chose<br />
the shorter guy and<br />
the scrutiny over<br />
that choice will be<br />
immense among football<br />
fans in the next few years.<br />
In the ‘going’ slot, we have 39-yearold<br />
Pro Bowl veteran Aaron Rodgers,<br />
the long-time Green Bay Packer<br />
stalwart still at the top of his game,<br />
going to the New York Jets. Rodgers<br />
was not shy in telling the world he no<br />
longer wanted to play in Wisconsin<br />
and that the Jets would be his preferred<br />
new team. After a month or so<br />
of negotiations, stalling and threats,<br />
a deal involving a variety of draft<br />
picks was finally consummated, and<br />
Rodgers will face Big Apple pressure<br />
in taking the Jets to the promised<br />
land — the playoffs. The Jets haven’t<br />
made the playoffs in 12 years and<br />
own the longest North American<br />
playoff drought among all major<br />
sports. Pressure? After the Rodgers’<br />
deal was announced, the Jets were<br />
pegged by the betting industry with<br />
the fourth-best odds to win next<br />
year’s Super Bowl.<br />
For the longest time, Baltimore<br />
Ravens’ QB Lamar Jackson was in<br />
apparent limbo, given the ‘franchise’<br />
tag by the Ravens after contract<br />
negotiations stalled. Being ‘tagged'<br />
means any team could sign Jackson<br />
to a contract, but would have to<br />
forfeit two first-round draft picks.<br />
Jackson is a great player (the NFL’s<br />
MVP in <strong>20</strong>19), but injury prone, having<br />
missed 10 games over the past<br />
two years. Jackson felt he should<br />
be able to sign a fully guaranteed<br />
contract, similar to the $230 million<br />
five-year pact — 100 per cent guaranteed<br />
— Deshaun Watson signed in<br />
Cleveland. Finally, Jackson got his<br />
way, inking a $250 million five-year<br />
deal with Baltimore, of which $185<br />
million is reportedly guaranteed.<br />
Jackson is certainly wealthy, but he<br />
also remains injury-prone and that<br />
has to be of grave concern to the Ravens,<br />
and their financial officers.<br />
Care to comment?<br />
Email brucepenton<strong>20</strong>03@yahoo.ca<br />
Sports Quips<br />
9<br />
• Bob Molinaro of pilotonline.com: “The<br />
Oakland A’s relocation in <strong>20</strong>27 will give<br />
Las Vegas three major pro sports franchises.<br />
Finally, something for tourists to do in<br />
that town.”<br />
• Scott Ostler of the San Francisco Chronicle,<br />
on what fans might expect after the<br />
Oakland A’s move to Las Vegas: “Dollar<br />
slots, Keno runners in every section, ushers<br />
dressed up as Elvis!”<br />
• Former Edmonton Sun columnist Terry<br />
Jones, on Twitter: “New arena deal for Calgary<br />
includes $330 million from province.<br />
That’s roughly $330 million more than<br />
provided by the province for Rogers Place.<br />
Do I have that right? Anybody remember<br />
exactly?”<br />
• Bob Molinaro again: “You know who’s also<br />
very happy with Lamar Jackson’s contract?<br />
Cincinnati’s Joe Burrow, next in line<br />
to become the richest quarterback.”<br />
• Winnipeg Sun headline, after Winnipeg<br />
Jets were eliminated from the Stanley Cup<br />
playoffs by Vegas Golden Knights: “End of<br />
an error: Jets crap out in Vegas.”<br />
• Mike Bianchi of the Orlando Sentinel, on<br />
Twitter: “If what ESPN's Adam Schefter is<br />
reporting is accurate — and I'm sure it is<br />
— I believe the Packers just traded Aaron<br />
Rodgers to the Jets for a bag of balls, a<br />
case of beer and a 25 per-cent-off coupon<br />
for an oil change at Jiffy Lube!”<br />
• Comedy writer Alex Kaseberg: “This just<br />
in: Tucker Carlson to be the new QB at<br />
Green Bay.”<br />
• From the parody website the Beaverton:<br />
“Calgary tackles housing crisis by<br />
spending $867 million on new home for<br />
the Flames.”<br />
• RJ Currie of sportsdeke.com: “New York<br />
City mayor, Eric Adams, has called a war<br />
on rats: ‘The conditions that help (rats)<br />
thrive will no longer be tolerated.’ If Boston<br />
meets the Rangers in the playoffs, that<br />
can't be good news for Brad Marchand.”<br />
• Headline at the onion.com: “Roger<br />
Goodell excited to see so much talented<br />
inexpensive labour”<br />
• From fark.com: “Lions GM Brad Holmes<br />
smashed a table in joy after drafting RB<br />
Jahmyr Gibbs. Meanwhile, Lions fans<br />
smashed a table in disgust after drafting<br />
RB Jahmyr Gibbs.”<br />
MCKILLOP - CONTINUES FROM PAGE 6<br />
because they have been trying for years to resolve the <strong>issue</strong>, the RM go straight to<br />
arbitration with the SMB rather than “wasting” the money on mediation. “I’d just<br />
as soon say, just tell us what’s happening and save the money.” Reeve Schmidt said<br />
that by accepting the Minister’s recommendation, “it looks like we are taking steps<br />
to come to an agreement.”<br />
Councilor Arndt expressed concern that if it is decided at SMB, the RM would be<br />
restricted in what they could do and potentially be required to maintain the roads<br />
at the same level as “all the other roads in the RM.”<br />
Council will also request representatives from each Village attend though they<br />
acknowledged they couldn’t control who was sent. The Resort Villages have agreed<br />
to have one spokesperson speak on behalf of the group, Tom Fulcher. He is a current<br />
councilor at Sunset Cove and was the former <strong>May</strong>or. The RM has been trying<br />
to negotiate separately with each Village. In a Sept <strong>20</strong>21 meeting, Reeve Schmidt<br />
said, “Ultimately we should be negotiating that individually with each village.”<br />
Then Councilor Dixon said he didn’t disagree, “but we have tried to get them to<br />
the table, we have tried the divide and conquer routine…which is the way to go, I<br />
agree, but it hasn’t worked.”<br />
Councilor Mark Strong then said he wanted to know the position of the RM representative<br />
they sent. This statement was not responded to during the discussion.<br />
“We don’t have any <strong>issue</strong> with regular vehicle traffic. All of our <strong>issue</strong>s are in the<br />
heavy-weight vehicles. It’s the heavy-weight water truck, sewer truck, garbage<br />
truck, construction truck that will come in and will destroy our road. It will be<br />
wet, and they don’t care when they come in,” said Reeve Schmidt.<br />
CAO, Camille Box, said that the resort villages have always said that there should<br />
be road maintenance agreements, but those are not the appropriate types of agreements<br />
and are typically for short-term hauling projects.<br />
Reeve Bob Schmidt said he would contact Gary Dixon to invite him. <strong>LMT</strong> has attempted<br />
to contact Reeve Schmidt, Former Councilor Dixon and all of the Council<br />
for an update if the invitation has been accepted.<br />
The only response has been from Councilor Mark Strong, who said, “This was not<br />
voted on and was not an invitation from all of council.” <strong>LMT</strong> informed him that<br />
the invitation was included in the motion, and he responded, “Well then I misunderstood<br />
the motion if that is the fact. I think we would still need to vote on the<br />
person as a council. Also I would say it should be a member of council or all of<br />
council who should take part in the mediation.”<br />
Town of Lumsden<br />
PUBLIC NOTICE<br />
Public notice is hereby given that the<br />
Council of the Town of Lumsden intends<br />
to adopt a bylaw under The Planning and<br />
Development Act, <strong>20</strong>07 to amend Bylaw<br />
No. 15-<strong>20</strong>02, known as the Zoning Bylaw.<br />
REASON AND INTENT<br />
Bylaw No. <strong>20</strong>23-06 proposes to amend<br />
the development standards of the Town<br />
Centre Commercial (C1) Zoning District<br />
to reduce the minimum side yard setback<br />
of a principal structure to 600 millimetres.<br />
The reason for the amendment is<br />
to provide greater flexibility for the<br />
construction of a commercial building<br />
within the C1 – Zoning District.<br />
AFFECTED LANDS<br />
This text amendment will potentially<br />
affect all lands in the Town Centre<br />
Commercial (C1) District.<br />
PUBLIC INSPECTION<br />
Any person may inspect the bylaw at<br />
the Lumsden Municipal Office, located<br />
at 300 James Street North, in the Town<br />
of Lumsden, between the hours of 8:00<br />
AM and 4:00 PM (open through the<br />
noon hour) from Monday to Friday,<br />
excluding statutory holidays. Copies of<br />
the proposed bylaw are available at the<br />
Lumsden Municipal Office for a cost of<br />
$1.00 and are on the Town of Lumsden<br />
website; www.lumsden.ca, under the<br />
‘Announcements’ tab.<br />
PUBLIC HEARING<br />
Council will hold a public hearing on<br />
Tuesday, <strong>May</strong> 23, <strong>20</strong>23, at 7:00 PM via<br />
ZOOM and in Council Chambers at the<br />
Lumsden Municipal Office at 300 James<br />
Street North, to hear any person or group<br />
that wants to comment on the proposed<br />
bylaw. Council will also consider written<br />
comments received at the hearing or<br />
delivered to the undersigned at the<br />
municipal office prior to the hearing. For<br />
further information, or to receive a weblink<br />
to attend the meeting, please contact<br />
the undersigned at (306) 731-2404 or<br />
d.donahue@lumsden.ca<br />
Issued at the Town of Lumsden this 27th day of April <strong>20</strong>23.<br />
Denise Donahue, Planner