Attorney Mark Osterman - Alaska State of Corruption

MR. HAEG: That's the first.
MR. OSTERMAN: That's the first incident but the timeline of
events that we are goanna be able to put our finger in and press
the button if we can get – number 1 Is the Court of Appeals
going to be willing to completely reverse and send you back for
a new trial? Number 1. Number 2 are we going to have - be able
to re-litigate and revisit those issues that predate your
confession? In the timeline of things I think the Court of
Appeals is goanna be willing to back up to when your attorney
committed malpractice.
MR. HAEG: Ok.
MR. OSTERMAN: Ok? I don't think the search warrant issues are
goanna be necessarily covered and I don't think I can - I can
get you to escape the complete and total liability – I don't
think the Court of Appeals would be willing to do that.
MR. HAEG: Well when I can show that the search warrants – see
I've been doing my research – when the search warrants bad it's
called the poisonous tree.
MR. OSTERMAN: Fruit of the poisonous tree. But here's the
situation. The Court of Appeals is only going to go back to
what they can clearly identify as being the wrong feature in
your case that produced all the wrong results.
MR. HAEG: Well wasn't that one of them?
MR. OSTERMAN: No.
MR. HAEG: Why not?
Osterman Transcripts 38 of 119