Attorney Mark Osterman - Alaska State of Corruption

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MR. OSTERMAN: You get them charged that'll – that'll be a big – a great big ribbon in your hair but you got to remember something, ok? MR. HAEG: I'm pretty... MR. OSTERMAN: Don't bet on it. I got a case right now... MR. HAEG: Ok. MR. OSTERMAN: where the police officer testified 4 times, falsely to the grand jury, and 6 times falsely to the petit jury, for a total of 10 times. I brought it up in the jury trial aint nobody jumping all over themselves to prove this police officer lied to anybody. In fact we tried to sue the police officer and just got a letter from the Attorney General saying it was permissible for the police officer to lie in front of the jury. Ok? MR. HAEG: I know. MR. OSTERMAN: There's no wrong doing in that. MR. HAEG: So are you goanna watch when they stomp my head in also? MR. OSTERMAN: No. I don't watch. MR. HAEG: Ok that's a good thing. ... I- you know there's - see what kind of makes me nervous too is there's a lot of stuff that your guy will not know has gone horribly wrong but I do because of my conversations with my own attorneys. MR. OSTERMAN: Ok. MR. HAEG: and you see how they kept that out? Osterman Transcripts 48 of 119
MR. OSTERMAN: Mm hmm. MR. HAEG: You look at the whole trial you would never know that I had a Rule 11 Agreement other than during sentencing Scot Leaders says "Dave broke the Rule 11 Agreement so since he's that bad a person lets add on another couple years on his license suspension." MR. OSTERMAN: See the - the Rule 11 Agreement by – by rules of - of evidence is inadmissible. Ok. Any offer or attempt to settle a case is absolutely inadmissible to a jury under any circumstances. MR. HAEG: Not when I followed through and game them payment then they broke it then it aint. It's absolutely admissible. MR. OSTERMAN: No it's not admissible to this jury. It may be admissible for the purposes of any civil litigation that may arise out of. The court of – the Rules of Evidence are very, very clear. MR. HAEG: Oh I see - before the jury. But what I'm saying is for the case somebody in the case could have looked at it. The judge – if we would have brought it up for the judge she would have had to have a (no) evidentiary hearing to see if there was a – if there was a deal or not and if she thought there was a deal she would have had to give it to us. Well Chuck's like "oh there was not deal – there was no deal" and I'm like "Chuck how can I have all these emails that there was a deal?" "Well Brent says that there wasn't – that he doesn't really know if there Osterman Transcripts 49 of 119
Page 1 and 2: Transcript 2 - Attorney Mark Osterm
Page 3 and 4: MR. HAEG: I think it was - how was
Page 5 and 6: -you know- and I and this is where
Page 7 and 8: MR. OSTERMAN: I hate - I - I don't
Page 9 and 10: got over 2 months. Now and I didn't
Page 11 and 12: MR. OSTERMAN: No. MR. HAEG: You fil
Page 13 and 14: and maybe I am right now but I'm -
Page 15 and 16: unbelievable. I mean the way he ans
Page 17 and 18: MR. HAEG: Ok what about not stickin
Page 19 and 20: know- I have a business attorney Da
Page 21 and 22: grievously by this but I'm willing
Page 23 and 24: MR. HAEG: Yep. MR. OSTERMAN: and th
Page 25 and 26: MR. HAEG: Exactly yep. MR. OSTERMAN
Page 27 and 28: MR. OSTERMAN: Well you got - you go
Page 29 and 30: MR. HAEG: Ok. MR. OSTERMAN: Ok? I'm
Page 31 and 32: so I'm not smart and I understand t
Page 33 and 34: is I'll - we'll start raising money
Page 35 and 36: Osterman Transcripts 35 of 119
Page 37 and 38: MR. HAEG: Yep. MR. OSTERMAN: And wh
Page 39 and 40: MR. OSTERMAN: Because the - the rea
Page 41 and 42: If your attorney was before the cou
Page 43 and 44: MR. OSTERMAN: Ok one way or the oth
Page 45 and 46: oxes yet - I'm in the middle of thi
Page 47: win". I'm like - this is why I star
Page 51 and 52: investigator". See I now I'm saying
Page 53 and 54: would kind of be a violation of the
Page 55 and 56: MR. OSTERMAN: ... and he said "ok I
Page 57 and 58: MR. HAEG: ...and getting people to
Page 59 and 60: MR. HAEG: Dale Dolifka and he when
Page 61 and 62: MR. HAEG: Yep. MR. OSTERMAN: Revers
Page 63 and 64: MR. OSTERMAN: ... cause you're obvi
Page 65 and 66: intentions to begin with and then a
Page 67 and 68: MR. OSTERMAN: This is not an equity
Page 69 and 70: MR. HAEG: Cause I think if it was i
Page 71 and 72: MR. HAEG: Yeah well when you been t
Page 73 and 74: MR. HAEG: Mark Osterman what MR. OS
Page 75 and 76: as some kind of weirdo kook - you t
Page 77 and 78: MR. OSTERMAN: I can believe it. MR.
Page 79 and 80: eply brief". It tells us that you -
Page 81 and 82: MR. HAEG: Yeah you did. MR. OSTERMA
Page 83 and 84: ights are substantial rights and he
Page 85 and 86: MR. HAEG: Why not? MR. OSTERMAN: I
Page 87 and 88: MR. OSTERMAN: I told you before I g
Page 89 and 90: emember that the - that the - the i
Page 91 and 92: do a malpractice case at the same t
Page 93 and 94: MR. HAEG: My attorney never stood u
Page 95 and 96: the subject matter combined but I k
Page 97 and 98: to Chuck. Can't do anything with Ch
Page 99 and 100:
MR. OSTERMAN: But well - not - bear
Page 101 and 102:
MR. HAEG: Oh so him telling me that
Page 103 and 104:
Ok? That's the bottom line. And the
Page 105 and 106:
MR. HAEG: and how did all that play
Page 107 and 108:
your income for a whole year and yo
Page 109 and 110:
MR. HAEG: Well - ok what do you thi
Page 111 and 112:
MR. OSTERMAN: Well you're - you're
Page 113 and 114:
MR. HAEG: So you don't think Brent
Page 115 and 116:
went back to school for some other
Page 117 and 118:
therefore the judge is punishing yo
Page 119:
when I was 16 years old in my plane
show all

Attorney Mark Osterman - Alaska State of Corruption

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?