13.10.2023 Views

Vector Issue 12 - 2011

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Why should Australia be interested in the<br />

Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)?<br />

Despite the fact that focus is indeed on<br />

developing nations, Aboriginal & Torres Straight<br />

Islander (ATSI) communites have health statistics<br />

comparable to poorer countries. So there is much<br />

that is relevant especially with our poor track record<br />

in improving ATSI health and, not only that, when<br />

this country is faced with an unsustainable health<br />

system there is much to be learnt from some of the<br />

successes of the approach.<br />

The initiative was launched in September 2000,<br />

building upon a decade of major United Nations<br />

conferences and summits where world leaders came<br />

together at the United Nations Headquarters in<br />

New York to adopt the United Nations Millennium<br />

Declaration, committing their nations to a new<br />

global partnership to reduce extreme poverty. It is<br />

important to note the time for planning and gaining<br />

a commitment compared to how long this country<br />

takes to plan and implement health interventions. A<br />

series of time-bound targets were set with a deadline<br />

of 2015. Such long term planning and goals are<br />

impossible in Australia thanks to our electoral cycle<br />

and the short term funding of health projects.<br />

The eight goals were assessed for progress and<br />

further resources were allocated to countries that<br />

were clearly not going to achieve their goals without<br />

extra support.<br />

Australia set the National Health Goals and Targets<br />

in 1994 1 ]. What happened to them? We seemed<br />

to have moved to measuring activity leaving the<br />

question open as to whether the activity promotes<br />

the health of all Australians.<br />

This is the appeal of the MDGs in that they are<br />

focussed on populations as opposed to individuals.<br />

This is consistent with the well known aphorism<br />

of Dr Geoffrey Rose 2 , ‘... a preventive measure that<br />

brings large benefits to the community offers little<br />

to each participating individual.’ In Australia the<br />

focus is on the customer with a disease and no cost is<br />

spared to bring the benefits of the latest technology<br />

to bring a cure or to palliate. This has led to inverse<br />

care law being alive and well in that the provision<br />

of cutting-edge health services is located where the<br />

need is least 3,4 .<br />

Many strategies included in the MDG approach<br />

are synonymous with the social determinants of<br />

health, ten of which were identified by Wilkinson<br />

and expatriate Professor Sir Michael Marmot (visit<br />

http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/). He<br />

also emphasised the importance more recently of<br />

www.ghn.amsa.org.au<br />

<strong>12</strong><br />

MDGs not only for<br />

vector FEB <strong>2011</strong><br />

Dr Bret Hart, Head of Public Health Unit , Nort

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!