01.11.2023 Views

The Cyber Defense eMagazine November Edition for 2023

Cyber Defense eMagazine November Edition for 2023 #CDM #CYBERDEFENSEMAG @CyberDefenseMag by @Miliefsky a world-renowned cyber security expert and the Publisher of Cyber Defense Magazine as part of the Cyber Defense Media Group as well as Yan Ross, Editor-in-Chief and many more writers, partners and supporters who make this an awesome publication! 196 page November Edition fully packed with some of our best content. Thank you all and to our readers! OSINT ROCKS! #CDM #CDMG #OSINT #CYBERSECURITY #INFOSEC #BEST #PRACTICES #TIPS #TECHNIQUES

Cyber Defense eMagazine November Edition for 2023 #CDM #CYBERDEFENSEMAG @CyberDefenseMag by @Miliefsky a world-renowned cyber security expert and the Publisher of Cyber Defense Magazine as part of the Cyber Defense Media Group as well as Yan Ross, Editor-in-Chief and many more writers, partners and supporters who make this an awesome publication! 196 page November Edition fully packed with some of our best content. Thank you all and to our readers! OSINT ROCKS! #CDM #CDMG #OSINT #CYBERSECURITY #INFOSEC #BEST #PRACTICES #TIPS #TECHNIQUES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Murky Waters of Threat Intelligence<br />

One of the most pervasive challenges confronting organizations in their quest <strong>for</strong> effective threat<br />

intelligence is the sheer volume of data generated across a wide array of security tools. <strong>The</strong> relentless<br />

proliferation of in<strong>for</strong>mation makes it increasingly difficult to separate the signal from the noise. Inundated<br />

with a barrage of alerts and indicators of compromise, security teams often find themselves overwhelmed<br />

and unable to discern genuine threats from false positives. This in<strong>for</strong>mation overload not only wastes<br />

valuable time but also diverts resources away from addressing the most critical risks.<br />

While in<strong>for</strong>mation overload is perhaps the most apparent challenge when it comes to strengthening threat<br />

intelligence programs, there are several other key reasons why more organizations do not (or cannot)<br />

invest more time and energy in this area:<br />

• <strong>The</strong>re is an overall lack of contextualization of in<strong>for</strong>mation at hand. Raw data, without proper<br />

context, can be meaningless and may not provide actionable insights. If you can’t tie A to B to C,<br />

who cares? This mindset tends to silo security operations which perpetuates the lack of context<br />

problem.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> shortage of skilled personnel is yet another obstacle in the path of effective threat intelligence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cybersecurity talent gap is well documented and is driven largely by increased systems and<br />

architecture complexity, a growing demand <strong>for</strong> talent, budget constraints, and burnout. When<br />

combined, these factors have made it very difficult <strong>for</strong> organizations to recruit and retain skilled<br />

IT security professionals.<br />

• Interoperability issues within organizations existing security infrastructure constitute a significant<br />

hindrance to threat intelligence implementation. Many organizations operate a patchwork of<br />

security tools and systems that do not communicate seamlessly. This siloed approach impedes<br />

the flow of in<strong>for</strong>mation and hinders timely threat detection and response.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> ever-evolving nature of cyber threats presents perhaps the most unpredictable challenge.<br />

<strong>Cyber</strong>criminals are continually developing new tactics, techniques, and procedures to evade<br />

detection, making it extremely difficult <strong>for</strong> IT security teams to identify and then act on threats.<br />

Just one of these roadblocks is enough to deter organizations from investing more time and<br />

energy into developing threat profiles, deterrence tactics, and even remediation plans. <strong>The</strong> path<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward requires a certain degree of introspection. <strong>The</strong> willingness to look critically at operational<br />

shortcomings and prioritize areas of improvement that can contribute to better threat intelligence can pay<br />

off down the line, even if it means having to acknowledge some uncom<strong>for</strong>table truths first.<br />

<strong>Cyber</strong> <strong>Defense</strong> <strong>eMagazine</strong> – <strong>November</strong> <strong>2023</strong> <strong>Edition</strong> 126<br />

Copyright © <strong>2023</strong>, <strong>Cyber</strong> <strong>Defense</strong> Magazine. All rights reserved worldwide.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!