+IMPACT MAGAZINE ISSUE 26
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INSIGHT<br />
INSIGHT<br />
The Leadership category aims to<br />
recognise and celebrate innovative<br />
ideas that fall outside the scope of the<br />
Green Star framework.<br />
inspiring others to follow their lead. Coville warns that<br />
not every “novel” concept will qualify as an innovation.<br />
Initiatives would have to add value to the South African<br />
context that the credit is being adapted to respond to. He<br />
says teams must demonstrate that the proposed market<br />
transformation meets the following: has a guaranteed<br />
outcome; delivers a long-lasting impact; demonstrates an<br />
impact at significant scale; proves that the initiative has the<br />
potential to transform the industry; and provides benefits<br />
to both stakeholders in the industry and the general public.<br />
Without these standards, the concept of a “Market<br />
Transformation” might seem quite vague, but the credit<br />
provides structure and guidance. “It’s about making sure<br />
that you can respond to these questions, because that would<br />
imply that there’s an environmental benefit to what you’re<br />
claiming,” Coville says.<br />
The other credit, LEADERSHIP CHALLENGES,<br />
combines elements of the previous “Environmental<br />
Initiatives” and “Exceeding Greenstar Benchmarks” credits.<br />
The concept of a long-term, lasting and measurable impact<br />
comes to mind. Coville uses an environmental initiative<br />
as an example: “The intention is to grow a database of the<br />
innovative initiatives to serve as guidelines for other projects<br />
to be able to implement similar processes or systems.” He<br />
emphasises that potential leadership challenges will have to<br />
be assessed for validity as a Leadership Challenge ahead of<br />
the project being submitted for assessment. This is because<br />
they must carry the weight of applicability beyond that<br />
specific project. “The reason for this is to make sure that it<br />
is justifiable in terms of being applicable to other buildings<br />
too – so that as an outcome, that credit can be used and<br />
applied by others on their projects.”<br />
The intention is to grow a database<br />
of the innovative initiatives to serve<br />
as guidelines for other projects.<br />
as the calculators – and use them early on in the design<br />
development phase, rather than looking at them towards<br />
the end of the project.” Retief agrees, saying these tools<br />
will help teams to plot their journey, and avoid confusion<br />
in cases where it is applied as an afterthought.<br />
There are three levels to the OTHER CARBON credit.<br />
Its three focus points consider refrigerants, operational<br />
energy offset and upfront carbon offset. Projects teams<br />
aiming for the first level of points must identify refrigerants<br />
used in the building, as well as their carbon impact – and<br />
then offset that.<br />
The second and third levels tie in with the credits of<br />
Energy Use and Upfront Carbon, which, according to<br />
Retief, cover the full lifecycle of these processes. “For both<br />
of these levels, there may still be a carbon impact,” explains<br />
Coville. “In buildings where there is a carbon impact,<br />
project teams would need to quantify the carbon through<br />
It’s time for the industry to take on<br />
a productive role by generating power<br />
and using regenerative materials.<br />
the calculators provided, and offset it.” Gooljar adds that<br />
there is an opportunity for meeting some elements of the<br />
LEADERSHIP category in terms of offsetting emissions<br />
from construction activities.<br />
By making the whole process more accessible, Gooljar<br />
believes the tools and structure of this category are<br />
democratising the way project teams think about modelling<br />
and calculating energy and water use – “whether you’re big<br />
or small, complex or simple – and for everyone with various<br />
levels of expertise.”<br />
LEADERSHIP CATEGORY<br />
CATEGORY DIRECTOR: N/A<br />
MINIMUM CREDITS: None<br />
CREDITS: Market Transformation; Leadership Challenges<br />
Previously known as “Innovation”, the LEADERSHIP<br />
category calls on the sector’s frontrunners and game changers.<br />
“It aims to recognise and celebrate innovative ideas that fall<br />
outside the scope of the Green Star framework,” says Coville.<br />
Project teams are encouraged to identify initiative(s) in their<br />
project, or flowing from their project, that are not included<br />
in the Green Star categories. “If it can set a precedent that<br />
addresses a valid environmental concern, exceeds Green Star<br />
benchmarks, or be considered a pioneering initiative, process<br />
or strategy, it could become something that is available as<br />
guideline for all future projects,” he adds. A prime example<br />
is how the industry is designing and building staircases to<br />
minimise the use of lifts.<br />
Although the rating structure of the category is still<br />
being finalised, it will likely have two credits, drawing<br />
from the Australian tool’s “Leadership Challenges” and<br />
“Market Transformation” credits. According to Coville,<br />
10 points, aligning to 10 initiatives, will be made available<br />
initially. “Over time, we’ll be able to open up that threshold,<br />
in line with the Australian tool, once we’ve built up a bit<br />
more of a library of these innovations that projects can<br />
choose to target.”<br />
MARKET TRANSFORMATION is going to be similar<br />
to the current INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES AND<br />
TECHNOLOGIES credit, and encourages project teams<br />
to demonstrate that they are pushing the boundaries, and<br />
68 POSITIVE IMPACT <strong>ISSUE</strong> <strong>26</strong><br />
POSITIVE IMPACT <strong>ISSUE</strong> <strong>26</strong><br />
69