prototyping versatile space(s)

HB2 & ITI prototyping versatile space(s)
prototyping
versatile space(s)
...Re.Use.Re.Design.Re.Built...
Building Construction and Design 2 - HB2
Structural Design and Timber Engineering - ITI
TU Wien

prototyping
versatile space(s)
Architecture Design Studio SS 2023
Building Construction and
Design 2 - HB2
&
Structural Design and Timber
Engineering - ITI
TU Wien
2023
HB2

prototyping versatile space(s)
Design Studio SS 2023
A cooperative design studio by the Research
Unit Building Construction and Design 2 - HB2
- E253.5, Institute of Architecture and Design and
the Research Unit Structural Design and Timber
Engineering - ITI - E259-02, TU Wien
Editor and Editorial Team
Dr. Ing. Dipl.-Ing. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger
with support from Dipl.-Ing. Marilies Wedl, Mire
Neumann, Karagozaiym Turganbek and Francesca
Andriolli. Original text and projects by students and
authors.
Authors
Dr. Ing. Dipl.-Ing. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger, Univ.
Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Peter Bauer, Dipl.-Ing. Marilies Wedl
& Students: Raphael Auffarth, Yoan Avramov, Peter
Babos, Antonia Behr, Sara Borjanovic, Dan Pavel
Bucur, Emily Marlena Fuchs, Elsa Gjinaj, Vanessa
Jäger, Eralba Jonuzi, Gergely Juhasz, Marija Klisanin,
Anja Krnetic, Krystina Masilevich, Johannes Matthes,
Ekaterina Mihaylova, Uros Miletic, Cathal O’Brien,
Dylan Reilly, Rok Zidar.
Burcu Ates, Predrag Milic and Laura Sobral (p.72-79).
Coverdesign
Karagozaiym Turganbek
Copyright
All Illustrations are copyright of the respective
photographers.The rights of the texts, plans and
graphics are held by the authors and HB2 & ITI
Credits
© Design Studio Versatile Space(s) 2023, TU
Wien, HB2&ITI
Images may be used for educational or informational
purposes. Please credit the authors.
Print
Vica Druck
Online: https://www.yumpu.com/user/emergingfields
The activities during this designstudio have been
supported as part of the EXCITE 2022 program,
Faculty of Architecture and Spatial Planning. Excite 22
Team: Dr. Ing. DI Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger, Burcu
Ates, Predrag Milic, Laura Sobral, DI Marilies Wedl
The printing of the booklet was supported by
Mastercard.
Cooperation partners
Materialnomaden | IG Architektur | Karlsplatz.org
ISBN 978-3-9519864-3-2
Published by TU Wien, Research Unit of Building
Construction and Design - HB2 | www.hb2.tuwien.ac.at

CONTENT
Abstract
Lunch Dialogues
Students’ Reflections
Previously on HB2 & ITI
Awarded for the Excite Program
Design Task for the Semester
Project Development
Geometry Approach
Prototyping & Construction
Team
Future Prospects
6
8
24
42
46
58
66
80
90
128
138

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
6

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
Throughout the design studio, we have pondered the
question: How can we effectively convey the topic of
sustainability to the public?
The answer is simple: By illustrating that each of us holds
a responsibility for our environment. And how do we
demonstrate this responsibility?
With VE.SH - a pavilion constructed from reusable
materials, accompanied by a two-week program featuring
various events such as debates, lectures, and workshops
for people of all ages - young and old alike.
The pavilion itself makes a powerful statement not only
through its use of recycled materials, but also due to its
flexibility, capable of being configured in three distinct
setups - the passage, the room, and the stage. Each
configuration, with minimlal intervention, can facilitate
different programs and spatial experiences, showcasing
the versatile potential of one repurposed material and the
myriad possibilities architecture unlocks.
... All achieved by simply utilizing materials destined for the
trash.“
The students of the design studio, July 2023
7

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
LUNCH DIALOGUES
After the complete assembly of the Pavilion, a 10-day
program unfolded as scheduled, running from June 20th
to June 30th.
The program featured the ‚5 before 12 Lunch Dialogues‘,
a key component of this design studio, aimed at initiating
public dialogues within ve.sh pavilion framework. The
dialogues explored topics such as temporary places in a
public space, spatial generosity and resource conservation,
constructive finesse and detailing, as well as current
discourse and programming.
10

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
STARTING WITH
PASSAGE...
01
02
PLAN
22.06.
CONSTRUCT
23.06.
03
HOW TO:
Lunch Dialogue
5 min to 12.00
24.06
USE
07
RECYCLE
29.06.
...ENDING
WITH STAGE!
06
TU Wien Architecture Students
in dialogue about the role of
architecture in creating a
sustainable future
28.06.
RECONSTRUCT
27.06.
REUSE
05
26.06.
MODERNIZE
04
...TRANSFORMING
INTO ROOM...
11

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
L U N C H
D I A L O G U E S
12

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
F Ü N F V O R Z W Ö L F
13

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
VERNISSAGE
Good evening everyone,
Thank you to each of you for joining us today. We are very
pleased to welcome you to the premiere of the VE.SH
(Versatile Trash Pavilion 2023). I am Elsa, a student from
TU Wien studying architecture, and I will be moderating
today‘s event.
We would like to extend a warm welcome to our esteemed
lecturers and mentors who guided us throughout this
semester: Mrs. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger, Mr. Peter
Bauer, and Miss Marilies Wedl. We also welcome the Head
of the Architecture Faculty, Mr. Rudolf Scheuvens.
Allow us to share a brief story about our team:
Nearly a year ago, the idea for the VE.SH project was
initiated by our mentors Sandra, Peter, and Marilies, under
the theme of „Prototyping Versatile Spaces.“ This idea
was then carried forward by students from the previous
semester in the Faculty of Architecture. We embarked on a
journey of testing various geometric shapes, materials, and
construction methods. Subsequently, we moved towards
the finalization of the project and its actual construction.
Since March of this year, we have diligently worked to bring
to life the Pavilion that stands before us today.
Design and Process, Purpose Regarding the Work Process:
Our pavilion was created through the convergence of
various aspects: versatility, landmark status, geometric
principles, public integration, and most importantly,
sustainability. The primary goal was to craft versatile
spaces by transforming reused materials and components.
The straight sun-blinds, obtained from an existing building
on the verge of demolition, underwent a transformation
process that resulted in the unique structure we see before
us.
Regarding the Work Process:
We operated in groups, initially focusing on specific domains
and later collaborating to construct the pavilion. We will
now share the details of this process.
Groups:
Kate + Eralba + (Discussing Geometry and Structural
Design, etc.): (Displaying the 3D model)
Raphael + Dylan + (Explaining the Construction Process,
Material, etc.): (Showcasing the straight blind)
Kristina + Marija (Talking about Logistics, Coordination,
etc.)
14

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
Appreciation Message: Partners, Sponsors:
**We would like to express our appreciation to our partners
who have supported us: Material Nomaden, IG Architektur,
_______ where we held our meetings and workshops.
(Invitation to speak)
Mentors:
Cathal (Discussing Social Media): (Displaying the QR code)
Vanessa + Anja (Discussing the Program): (Presenting the
poster with the detailed program)
Many activities will find their place here, starting from today
until the 29th of June. There will be Lunch Dialogues that
delve into the role of architecture in creating a sustainable
future, commencing at 5 minutes to 12:00. These dialogues
carry the message that time is running out. Processes
such as planning, construction, recycling, and reusing will
be discussed by well-known architects and associated
professionals. They will share their opinions and experiences
with us. The modular structure of the Pavilion allows for
the formation of different configurations, demonstrating its
true versatility.... (Displaying the Poster with the detailed
Program)
**A special thanks from us goes to Sandra, Peter, and
Marilies for their invaluable help and guidance throughout
this entire journey. (Invitation to speak)
Students:
Thank you to the students for your dedicated hard work up
to this point. To the Geometry and Structural Design Group,
Prototyping Group, Programming and Logistics Group, you
have done an exceptional job.
End - Pavilion Tour
We warmly invite you to explore the pavilion and its patches.
We also look forward to seeing you during the Lunch
Lectures in the coming days. Thank you.
Message:
In short, our message revolves around „REUSING.“
Managing waste, particularly in terms of materials, has
always posed a challenge. As future architects, we must not
only be conscious of how we build but also of the materials
we use. How do we utilize our resources? Which materials
can be recycled, and what‘s even more impactful? Reuse.
15

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
POETRY SLAM BY
JANINA GLORIA
Elsa Gjinaj and Rok Zidar introduced poetry slammer Janina
Gloria. Janina Gloria performed a poetry on the topic of
sustainability.
Es geht um nur so wenig aber so viel zugleich
Es geht um Nachhaltigkeit
Um den Vergleich
wieviel den Bach runter geht
wenn man Chancen ablehnt
Es geht um nur so wenig
aber um so viel zugleich
Es geht um Nachhaltigkeit
Versetz dich mal rein
Stell dir mal vor
Du bist seit tausenden von Jahren immer da
Immer am geben
nie am nehmen
Du willst die Welt einfach zur Gänze wahrnehm
und tust deswegen
so viel
Aber beim Nehmen
fangen deine Augen an zu tränen
Du kannst nicht mehr
weinst so viel
bist so schwach geworden
aber hauptsache
Rohstoffe gewonnen
Du wirst zuvor zerstört und vernichtet
aber zumindest ist jetzt der Außenbereich belichtet
Wie wird was gewichtet?
Ich würd dir gern helfen
zur Seite stehn
Du sagst du hast Heimweh
sehnst
dich nach deinem gewohnten Zuhause
Janina Glora performing Poetry Slams on sustainability
Ich würd dir gern helfen aber glaube
Es gibt keine kurze Krisenpause
Wenn
dann nur ein Weg
Wie man die schlimmsten Katastrophen übersteht
oder
eine sogenannte Prävention
die sich langfristig lohnt
wählt
Es geht um nur so wenig aber so viel zugleich
Es geht um Nachhaltigkeit
Um das Umwandeln und Wiederverwenden
um das Spenden
Damit wir was zurückgeben
den Prozess nach vorn bewegen
und anfang nicht nur zu nehmen
denn aus der Sicht
des ökologischen Gleichgewichts
ist Fortschritt
anders schwierig
Beim Artensterben
das sich vermehrt,
die Erde die sich erwärmt
und den Lebensraum vieler Tiere entfernt
16

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
sollten Stimmen
wie die unsere
In einer solchen Situation
eine bedeutendere Position erlangen
Ist das zu viel zu verlangen?
denn
es geht um nur so wenig
aber so viel zugleich
Es geht um Nachhaltigkeit
um den Müll
die Verschmutzung
der Grund für Herausforderung
Wir habens noch weit
die Strecke, der Weg
aber nicht schwierig ist
es nen Schritt zu gehn
Die Umstände zur Zeit sind nicht so bequem
Früher oder später wirst du das sehn
aber
willst du das wirklich?
Das Gefühl zu haben
es geht nicht mehr rückgängig
Man braucht neue Methoden
für weniger bedrohen
wie temporäre Pavillons
für eine bessere Ressourcenbalance
Recyclebares Material
für deinen eigenen Nutzen schlussendlich
dir wird nichts genommen
die Resteverwertung nur nicht verschwenderisch
Denn Nachhaltigkeit
sollte keine Hürde sein
Nachhaltigkeit
schafft jeder allein
und für größere Projekte
ist die Bevölkerungsdichte
wenn man ehrlich ist
mehr als groß genug
Wir kommen dahin
wenn jeder was tut
so wenig aber so viel zu gleich
Eine Zukunft mit Nachhaltigkeit
öffnet Türen
die Optionen vorführen
öffnet Türen
bei denen man sich zuvor dachte eine Wiederverwertung
wäre unnötig
aber sieht man nicht jetzt?
Wenn man sich stark genug ran setzt
wie man dann Steine versetzt
und sich die Zukunftsaussichten positiver einrichten?
Was würd wohl die Erde grad berichten?
Ich bin trocken, ich bin ausgelaugt
Mir haben die Menschen Lebenskraft geraubt
werde beschmutzt
beraubt
Aber die Menschheit bleibt wohl taub
und hat mir ihre eigene Zukunft geklaut
Ich geb ihr aber noch eine Chance
für die ökologische Balance
aber dafür
muss jeder anpacken
und mehr machen
als
paar Blumen gießen und das Gras anlachen
Verwertetes Wiederverwertetes werden lassen
nicht nur sagen
sondern auch mal
weiterbringende Projekte wagen
denn zusammengefasst
das Meerwasser, dass du anfasst
wird immer wärmer
dadurch schmelzen Gletscher
und ja ich weiß
die liegen inder Ferne
aber Konsequenzen sieht man dort und auch bei uns
nicht gerne
Folgen wie
extreme Wetterereignisse
beispielsweise lange Hitze
Massensterben von Tieren
Überflutungen
wisst ihr
so schlimm wie heuer
hat es diese Welle noch nie gegeben
also müssen wir uns bewegen
jetzt.
hoffentlich habt ihr euch genug hineinversetzt
Bewegung
durch eine Nachhaltigkeitsanforderung
an
einen jeden von euch
auch für nächste Generationen
ihr habt es dann bestimmt nicht bereut
Es geht um so wenig aber so viel zu gleich
Bitte schaut auf mehr Nachhaltigkeit
17

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
LUNCH DIALOGUE WITH
WERNER SOBEK
Ekaterina Mihailova and Vanessa Jäger interviewed Werner
Sobek about sustainability and our future.
„Also im Grunde geht es doch darum, dass die Menschen
sich so verhalten, dass sie die Natur nicht schädigen, weil
wenn die Natur zusammenbricht oder in ihren Funktionen
nicht mehr das tut, was wir benötigen, dann ist ein
Überleben für die Menschheit nicht mehr möglich.
Also müssen wir im Grunde unser Denken und Handeln
danach ausrichten, dass wir die Natur in all ihren
Funktionalitäten pflegen und erhalten. Und das ist vielleicht
auch das, was man im weitesten Sinne als Nachhaltigkeit
verstehen kann. Nämlich schlichtweg überleben ...
... Es geht um den Erhalt der Natur ... „
- Werner Sobek
The interview delves into the importance of sustainability
for the future, highlighting the protection of nature as
a fundamental element. It addresses the challenge of
translating scientific knowledge into a format that is
understandable and relevant for politicians, society, and
various disciplines.
One key issue discussed is the fragmentation of knowledge
in science, where experts often work in isolation within
their fields, hindering communication and understanding
between different disciplines. Werner Sobek emphasizes the
necessity of encouraging scientists to make their findings
more accessible and integrate them into societal discourse.
The interview also explores the role of architects as
interdisciplinary mediators who must anticipate the future.
Werner Sobek underscores the need for a comprehensive
discourse on sustainable practices within society, driven by
professionals with interdisciplinary knowledge.
A central point of discussion is the demand for quick and
effective dialogue between scientists, politicians, and
society to convey the complexity of environmental issues
and emphasize the necessity of a sustainable future for all.
The interview suggests finding happiness not in material
consumption but in embracing ideal values as a means to
achieve a sustainable and happier future.
The full interview is available on:
https://cba.fro.at/podcast/spaceuriosity
Radio Spaceuriosity auf Radio Orange 94.0. The radio broadcast was
prepared by Raphael Auffarth and Amar Kulenovic.
Werner Sobek, Ekaterina Mihailova and Vanessa Jäger
18

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
LUNCH DIALOGUE WITH
BAZON BROCK
Emily Fuchs and Johannes Matthes interviewed Bazon
Brock on the topic of Action Teaching.
The interview covers various complex topics, including
the coexistence of different economic systems, socialism
in contemporary contexts, and the struggle for societal
change.
Lunch Lecture with Werner Sobek
„Wenn hier so eine Aktion gestartet wird, dann heisst es,
es wird versucht das Medium des sozialen, das Medium
des wissenschaftlichen, das Medium des politischen, das
Medium des ökonomischen - nämlich Öffentlichkeit zu
demonstrieren....
... Öffentlichkeit ist gerade DER ausgegrenzte Bezirk, in
dem man nicht definiert wird ... „
- Bazon Brock
Exploring the aggressive commercialization of language and
concepts in modern capitalism, the interview includes the
following quote in German: „Der Begriff Freiheit wird heute
für das Verkaufen von Würstchen benutzt“ (translated:
„The term freedom is used today for selling sausages“).
The discussion also delves into the privatization of space,
critiquing the influence of capitalists and sounding the
alarm about the consequences of allowing private entities
to occupy and commercialize space. The conversation
touches on the impact of an excessive satellite presence
on astronomical observations and criticizes the lack of
regulation in permitting private companies to dominate
space exploration.
Addressing the education system, the interview questions
its efficacy in fostering critical thinking and individuality.
Brock suggests that universities have become institutions
fostering ignorance and emphasizes the need for individuals
to challenge societal norms and pursue intellectual
autonomy.
The full interview is available on:
https://cba.fro.at/podcast/spaceuriosity
Radio Spaceuriosity auf Radio Orange 94.0. A radio broadcast was
prepared by Raphael Auffarth and Amar Kulenovic.
Lunch Lecture with Bazon Brock
19

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
LUNCH DIALOGUE
WITH KATJA SCHECHNTER
Emily Fuchs and Antonia Behr interviewed Katja Schechtner
on the topics of Urban Development and current research.
...
IG ARCHITEKTUR ...
Lunch Dialogue with Katja Schechtner
Lunch Dialogue with Katja Schechtner
Thesen zum Umbau with IG Architektur
20

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
Thesen zum Umbau with IG Architektur
Emerging Fields Urban Co-Production with the EXCITE 2022 team
... THE EXCITE TEAM ...
THESEN ZUM UMBAU
WITH IG ARCHITEKTUR
EMERGING FIELDS
URBAN CO-PRODUCTION
Sara Borjanovic and Eralba Jonuzi interviewed members of
the Excite 2022 team on the topic of urban coproduction
„If you apply this logic of recognizing all 3 dimensions of city
production, it just opens up a new field for you to work...„
- Predrag Milic
Emerging Fields Urban Co-Production with the EXCITE 2022 team
21

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
... MATERIALNOMADEN ...
Raphael Auffarth and Peter Babos interviewed Peter
Kneidinger from Materialnomaden on the topics of
sustainable reuse of materials
„Unseren Krieg, den wir als Planer-Innen, Ingenieure und
Gestalter-Innen haben ist - der Krieg mit dem Detail, der
Krieg mit der Planung, mit dem Entwurf und mit dem
intelligenten Durchdenken von Produkten...„
- Peter Kneidinger
Interview with Peter Kneidinger, Materialnomaden
... AND THE YOUNGEST
GEOMETRY
Ekaterina Mihaylova and Anja Krnetic introduced
complex geometries to pupils of a elementary school
„Braunhubergasse“ and playfully exlplored with them how
to develop and work with different structures and materials.
The full interview is available on:
https://cba.fro.at/podcast/spaceuriosity
Radio Spaceuriosity auf Radio Orange 94.0. The radio broadcast was
prepared by Raphael Auffarth and Amar Kulenovic.
Elementary school kids working with our blinds
22

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
Group picture with the kids from the elementary school Braunhubergasse
23

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
OPENING & CLOSING EVENTS
Prototyping Versatile Spaces 2022 WS - 2023 SS
TU WIEN
Lecturers
Häuplik-Meusburger, Sandra; Bauer, Peter; Wedl, Marilies
Event Schedule and Program Curation Team
Vernissage
20.06.2023
16:00 Preparation
18:00 Start
18:00 Welcoming Speech by Elsa
18:00-18:10 Introduction: Design, Process, Goal, Message
- Elsa
18:10-18:30 Groups
Geometry: Kate, Eralba
Prototyping: Raphael, Dylan
Logistics: Krystsina, Marija
Social Media: Cathal
Program: Vanessa, Anja
18:30 Appreciation - Elsa
18:30 Conclusion
18:30 Pavilion Exploration and Tour
Finissage
29.06.2023
16:00 Preparation
18:00 Start
18:00-18:15 Presentation - Throwback to the activities
18:15-18:20 Message, Achievement, Feedback
18:20-18:25 Appreciation
18:25-18:30 Time-lapse Video
18:30 Conclusion
24

5 before 12 lunch dialogues
Monday, 19th of June: Soft Opening. Spntanous discussion about the Future of Architectgure with Wolf D. Prix, Hemma Fasch and the students.
Tuesday, 20th of June: Opening
25

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
STUDENTS‘ REFLECTIONS
As part of the Excite program, students were asked to
evaluate the design studio.
26

the intersection of both enabling this delightful interrelation.
Transforming a vision into reality demands the concerted eorts of creativity,
it is not required to renew parts of buildings in near future.
e the future.
reflections
Reuse the past, re
recycling is the solution.
in environmentally conscious construction.
Elsa Gijnaj
As long as we are not a zero waste society,
abstract mathematical concepts to life. To me, the most interesting buildings are the ones,
Marilies Wedl
as a symbol of our commitment to sustainable practices and our ability to bring
The pavilion we collectively designed and currently construct will serve
whose architecture can’t be described without describing its structure and vice versa. Geometry lies in
Cathal O‘Brien
Using materials to their fullest extent is a foundational ideal
Emily Fuchs
INPUT
Antonia Behr
Our biggest misconception is to acknowledge waste as some-
thing we can’t use anymore. Only if we do that it is actually wasted.
As planners we need to rethink
the way we use and reuse our resources.
Re-imagine -> Re-think -> Re-use
Johannes Matthes
Anja Krnetic
It is essential that our ideas have the capacity to envisi-
on the distant future and withstand the challenges that time presents.
Rok Zidar
Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We
allow them to disperse because we‘ve been ignorant of their value.
- Buckminster Fuller
WORK
Yoan Avramov
La vita è bella! Let’s keep it that way! Recycle !!!
PROGRAM
SPONSORING
construction = deconstruction = construction
Marija Klisanin
Just because some things were already used doesn‘t mean they
lose their value. They can still be given a new life.
the longer this equation goes, the better it is for our future.
Uros Miletic
DESIGN
Sara Borjanovic
means prolonging the one life our planet has.
Giving a second life to materials and building elements
T E A M
WORK
Eralba Jonuzi
T E A M
PROTOTYPING
that means to think of solutions that last for a long time so
Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We
allow them to disperse because we‘ve been ignorant of their value.
- Buckminster Fuller
Gergely Juhász
Raphael Auarth
For detailing it is important to do so for future,
More sustainable materials, less concrete.
Minimise waste - Maximise reuse
Ekaterina Mihaylova
what it was initially designed for.
AUTHORITIES
Dan Bucur
Each product can have so many dierent uses other than
what it was initially designed for.
cefulness. The emphasis on reusing materials underscores the signi cance of sustainability,
challenging traditional architectural practices and inspiring us to seek unconventional solutions.
Peter Babos
The course encapsulated the essence of innovation, creativity and resour-
Vanessa Jäger
Smart ideas are essential for reducing the use of resources as much
Krystina Mailevich
Green is the new pink.
LOGISTICS
recycling + reuse +resources = value
Dylan O‘Reilly
Identifying opportunities to reuse building materials can result in
unique architectural possibilites while promoting environmental and
economical sustainability.
INPUT
Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger
Peter Bauer
innovation, and resolve. This project exempli es how empowering young people
can pave the way towards a sustainable future, bene ting us all.
27

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THIS IS WHAT I EXPECTED
FROM THE DESIGN STUDIO:
From the design studio, I expected to learn new skills that
would benefit me as a future architect. I hoped to gain a
deeper knowledge of geometric and constructive principles.
The theme of DESIGN-TO-BUILD was particularly exciting
to me, and I anticipated being actively involved in the
hands-on process of building and creating a 1:1 structure.
- Anja Krnetic
I expected a collaborative design studio where students
come together to bring a design from conception through
to completion in a Design-to-Build process. I expected us
to design a pavilion and produce detailed drawings that we
could use to create it at a 1:1 scale and exhibit it in a public
space.
- Dylan Reilly
My expectations were to learn something about details,
especially complex details that enable a minimalist design.
- Emily Fuchs
I had the expectation that we would learn more about
Rhino and Grasshopper and also work on constructing a
pavilion as a team.
- Antonia Behr
My expectation was to plan a structure that would be built
by the end of the semester.
- Gergely Juhasz
I expected to gain insight into sustainable construction and
material use, as well as the processes involved in curating a
well-rounded program.
- Cathal O‘Brien
I anticipated that the design studio would emphasize
the development of a strong conceptual framework for
the project. Also, I expected it to encourage students to
think outside the box and come up with innovative design
solutions. Since the project involved working in a group, I
anticipated that the design studio would promote effective
teamwork and collaboration.
- Yoan Avramov
My expectation was to design and build a pavilion as a team.
- Johannes Matthes
28

reflections
A creative and genuinely interesting design studio where I
could feel productive by building something rather than just
visualizing it on paper.
- Eralba Jonuzi
I expected the studio to be more theoretical and designoriented.
- Dan Bucur
What I expected from
the studio was to
design as well as to
build a pavilion with
various configurations
using the help of
geometric principles.
A considerable amount of work and an immense amount of
knowledge to gain from it.
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
I expected to have an opportunity to learn Rhino and
Grasshopper better, design with models, and work handson
on a larger scale.
- Sara Borjanovic
- Marija Klisanin
29

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THIS IS WHAT I GOT:
I was able to understand the importance of reclaimed
building materials and the best way to reuse them to provide
a better and more sustainable future for us. It helped me
become a better future architect with greater awareness
of this global issue.
- Eralba Jonuzi
In reality, I had little to do with design as we focused more
on practice and building the pavilion.
- Dan Bucur
A considerable amount of work and an immense amount of
knowledge to gain from it.
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
The studio met my expectations quite well, although there
wasn‘t that much time to improve Rhino and Grasshopper
skills.
- Sara Borjanovic
I particularly learned a lot about the planning and
organizational steps of exhibitions.
- Emily Fuchs
The design studio met my expectations very well. As an
Erasmus student, it was interesting to observe the working
styles of students from other universities, as well as the
expectations of TU itself. I found it challenging moving
from TU to IGArchitektur, then to Arsenal, and finally to
Materialnomaden; at my home university, we have fixed
studio spaces.
- Cathal O Brien
My experience in the design studio involved engaging in a
variety of tasks that were not directly related to architecture,
which exceeded my initial expectations.
- Anja Krnetic
I participated in a studio that emphasized strong
collaboration within working groups and also some
collaboration with other working groups. We inherited a
conceptual design and through prototyping, we developed
a construction design which was used to manufacture the
pavilion. Simultaneously, we designed an exhibition with the
pavilion as the focal point of the program. Various other
disciplines were also incorporated to support our efforts in
creating a public exhibition.
- Dylan Reilly
I gained many different experiences by working together
on various tasks, such as the constructive aspects, the
program, or dealing with organizational matters.
- Antonia Behr
30

reflections
Working in groups, a
design principle that
was largely preset from
previous semesters, and
a challenging material to
work with.
What I expected. The only difference is that I expected
more freedom in the planning process. However, it was also
interesting and challenging to work with a given material.
- Gergely Juhasz
Since the task was based on last semester’s work, I did not
really work with geometry or the actual design. Furthermore,
we all refined the design together and had tasks none of
us had dealt with before, such as finding sponsors for our
pavilion, prototyping a 1:1 model, and evaluating its design,
stability, and joints.
- Marija Klisanin
The studio encouraged us to think outside the box and
come up with new and different solutions to problems I
didn‘t expect to face. Working in a team also had its own
difficulties, and time planning was an important point. We
had different teams managing different aspects of the
project. It was interesting to see how we communicated
and synchronized with each other and how each step and
group depended on the others. What I didn‘t exactly get
to do was design, because there was already a designed
concept for how the pavilion should look.
- Yoan Avramov
- Johannes Matthes
31

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THIS IS WHAT I HAVE LEARNED
My biggest takeaway has been gaining insight into the
complexity involved in the process of planning and
constructing a 1:1 structure.
- Anja Krnetic
I have learned how metal can be worked on and manipulated
to achieve a desired design. It has also made me aware
of some of the limitations that materials can have. It has
highlighted some of the pros and cons of a design-tobuild
process in construction. It has exposed me to all the
background work required when organizing an exhibition. I
acquired some basic graphic design skills which I have not
required until carrying out this project.
- Dylan Reilly
Extensive communication between all participants is very
time-consuming but also leads to tasks being completed
quickly.
- Emily Fuchs
I’ve learned about different ways to approach the technical
aspects of a complex design.
- Antonia Behr
How diverse aluminum can be used, and how a complex
form can be built by combining only one element.
- Gergely Juhasz
The studio taught me to always look for a better solution,
which can be achieved by having a look from another
perspective.
- Marija Klisanin
Teamwork, time planning, coordination, working with the
real materials (which I found great and really informative),
construction, coming up with unexpected solutions, and
adaptability.
- Yoan Avramov
I learned many new things about geometry and detailing, as
well as how to work with different materials and tools.
- Sara Borjanovic
Following this course, I learned a lot about geometric
principles, mostly about the complexity of a minimal
surface - a surface that locally minimizes its area! In this
studio, we also followed this path of minimizing, by trying
to minimize everything about the process of building; this
includes materials, costs, waste, workforce, etc. Combining
Architecture and Geometry with the help of computing
software.
- Eralba Jonuzi
32

reflections
I’ve learned how to have a more practical approach to a
project and how to find solutions for any challenges or
problems that might arise.
- Dan Bucur
I have learned how to
integrate architecture,
structural theory and
practice, geometry,
and urban design all
at once in one project.
Having completed this design studio, I feel I have a better
understanding of the ideologies of sustainable design.
Throughout the semester, I learned more about the
opportunities of reclaimed materials, and in this particular
case, the structural opportunities of aluminum. I also feel
I have developed my representational skills, as I produced
many graphics and images for the pavilion’s social media
pages.
- Cathal O Brien
If you want to build something from a material you haven’t
worked with, start building 1:1 scale mockups as soon
as possible. Get to know its strengths and weaknesses
and set your scope based on how well you work with it.
Compare your real model with your digital model and keep
in mind how to compensate for the tolerances you can
achieve. Checking twice can save you from building it
twice.
- Johannes Matthes
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
33

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THE MOST UNIQUE PART
OF THE STUDIO WAS:
The most unique part of the studio was reusing discarded
materials that would typically be seen as trash and
transforming them into something new and unique.
- Anja Krnetic
The most unique part of this studio is having a 1:1
representation of your work at the end of the semester and
being able to see how the public interacts with it. In typical
academic projects, we create an architectural experiment
but never get to see the results. Observing our public space
intervention at 1:1 allows us to see the true result of our
architectural experiment.
- Dylan Reilly
I think the best thing is that we plan a project and then
actually implement it because you learn to solve completely
new problems.
- Emily Fuchs
The most unique part was to work with recycled materials
and to deal with their specific attributes.
- Antonia Behr
Building the real thing!
- Dan Pavel Bucur
Clearly approaching sponsors! I had never done something
like that before, so it was quite a small challenge. We started
to profile our project – what it stands for and who we want
to address. After that, we searched for companies that fit
our profile and contacted them to explain our project.
- Marija Klisanin
Working with the real materials and trying to shape and
adapt them to our visions/needs. Creating joints for the
structure and coming up with solutions to every problem
that arose in the process of working.
- Yoan Avramov
Getting to create something with a limited amount of
reclaimed building materials led us to an exciting and
challenging experience.
- Eralba Jonuzi
34

reflections
For me, it was the
prototyping and the
building process. We not
only planned it on paper
but also considered how
it would work in real life.
Firstly, the task; secondly, 20 students working in one
group. It was very beautiful to see some colleagues who,
after finding their place in the whole amount of work, dived
really deeply and enthusiastically into it.
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
Definitely, it was the creative process leading to simple
solutions for complex geometrical requirements.
- Sara Borjanovic
Producing a 1:1 pavilion that will be exhibited at Karlsplatz
was a very unique aspect of this studio. This will be the first
project that I have worked on in my academic career that
will be constructed and exhibited in a public setting.
- Cathal O Brien
Building the design in a 1:1 scale. It was interesting to see
how much we could achieve but also to find out what we
couldn‘t achieve. Most of us worked with aluminum for the
first time, and for our level of experience, we managed to
get quite a lot done.
- Johannes Matthes
- Gergely Juhasz
35

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THE MOST ENJOYABLE PART
DURING THE STUDIO WAS:
The most enjoyable part of the design studio was being
able to engage in physical work and create things. Often,
we live in a digital world and don‘t get to experience our
work in a tactile, three-dimensional environment. Being able
to physically shape our design was a fun way to work and
brought a feeling of accomplishment.
- Dylan Reilly
During the studio, the building of the individual elements
and the design of the information appealed to me the most.
- Emily Fuchs
I liked how everyone contributed their specific knowledge
in order to achieve the best possible result.
- Antonia Behr
It was enjoyable when something we planned also worked
as we expected.
- Gergely Juhasz
It was enjoyable when something we planned also worked
as we expected.
- Gergely Juhasz
Prototyping the patches was the most enjoyable part
because we all built and refined what we designed. During
that time, I had lots of fun because it involved manual work,
and seeing the patch take shape as planned was delightful.
- Marija Klisanin
Teamwork and building something for real, not just an
imaginary design.
- Yoan Avramov
Seeing results was enjoyable. It was satisfying to overcome
challenges that kept us awake at night, finding solutions
through careful thought or trial and error.
- Johannes Matthes
36

reflections
Definitely the part of working in a group, since everyone
was motivated and keen to achieve the best results.
- Eralba Jonuzi
The entire building process, although challenging at times.
- Dan Bucur
One of the most
enjoyable aspects of the
design studio was the
opportunity to witness
the transformation
of initial concept into
tangible structure.
Learning, working, laughing together.
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
Another unique and enjoyable part of the studio was how
it was organized - the teamwork with many other students
with different backgrounds, skills, and knowledge.
- Sara Borjanovic
Working with the other students and channeling their
ideas and intentions into images and graphics that could
represent the project to the public. I also very much enjoyed
the physical work we did at Materialnomaden, constructing
the patches with the team and assembling them gave me a
great sense of accomplishment.
- Cathal O Brien
- Anja Krnetic
37

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THE MOST CHALLENGING PART
DURING THE STUDIO WAS:
The most challenging part of the design studio was
using the material we inherited to produce the design we
inherited. Repurposing a material can be extremely difficult,
particularly with a complex design. It was difficult to figure
out how the material could be used to create a complex
design given that we did not know how to work with metal
and the profile of the material was not ideal for the design.
- Dylan Reilly
The biggest challenge was communication because there
were so many participants. I learned that you can also make
decisions yourself and then ask the others for their opinion
instead of collecting all opinions first and then finding the
best solution.
- Emily Fuchs
Collecting ideas and testing how a patch can be made stiff
enough.
- Gergely Juhasz
To build a minimal surface using a non-symmetrical sunblind
profile.
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
For me, it was working with Rhino, Grasshopper, and
Karamba since I am a beginner with these programs. I
wanted to help Ekaterina out with the calculations of our
three configurations because they took quite some time
for one person to do. Knowing I was a beginner, she gladly
taught me how to use the programs, and I managed to
calculate one of the three configurations on my own.
- Marija Klisanin
Discrepancies between the digital and analogue model, the
inaccuracies between parts that should be the same, and
connecting our patches to form a larger structure.
- Johannes Matthes
Making the materials do what we wanted them to do. We
used a simple blind to design a patch and from a patch a
complex surface. First, we tried connecting the blinds
with L connections from shops and others, but that didn‘t
respond to our vision of how the pavilion should look and
the whole concept of sustainability. So we found a way to
create the patch just from the sunblind by bending, cutting,
and piercing the blinds.
- Yoan Avramov
38

reflections
The most challenging
part was to keep focus
about what the other
working groups were
doing.
I found it very challenging the idea to stick to the goal of
using only one material and making the most out of it, and
also to only work with reclaimed materials, nothing new.
Since for many problems there was also an easy way out,
by buying already made new parts. But at the end, we
managed to stick to our goal.
- Eralba Jonuzi
Finding simple and easy-to-build solutions to our technical
problems.
- Dan Bucur
In the very beginning when I faced the topic of minimal
surfaces for the first time, it was quite overwhelming. But
after lectures by Marilies Wedl, reading about it, watching
videos explaining the principles, and 3D printing physical
models, it all became clearer.
- Sara Borjanovic
- Antonia Behr
Not having a fixed workplace was a difficult aspect for me
in my working process. Having come from a studio culture
with fixed desk spaces for every student, it was difficult to
get comfortable and focused with my work in this nomadic
system. In my opinion, I find it easier to work in familiar
settings where I can store my working materials.
- Cathal O Brien
39

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
WORKING TOGETHER WAS:
The process of working together presented considerable
challenges, as we navigated the complexities of diverse
perspectives and dynamics within the team.
- Anja Krnetic
Working together in our working groups was effective
and enjoyable. Division of the work gave each group
a responsibility that could be addressed together.
Collaboration between groups was less successful. Each
group worked towards a common goal, so priorities were
aligned but expectations were not. I think there was a
lack of understanding with regards to the difficulties and
capabilities of each group.
- Dylan Reilly
I liked working together, the people were nice and especially
some people had a more intense spirit that kept the whole
class going.
- Antonia Behr
I think we worked quite effectively. We discussed everything.
- Gergely Juhasz
Instructive as well as fun. Although we teamed up in groups
for different tasks, we still interacted a lot and helped each
other out when there was help needed. Especially with the
prototyping – here everyone was eager to help and find the
best solution on how to build the patch. Of course, we also
had fun moments while prototyping which I think made us
grow as a team even more.
- Marija Klisanin
It was a great experience. I guess I was also lucky to be in a
good group and our Professor managed to guide us in our
tasks perfectly.
- Yoan Avramov
Fun and it made the whole process easier.
- Dan Bucur
The actual time of gaining new knowledge. I have learned
more through discussions with others, working with them,
and listening to tutors‘ criticism than by just reading
geometry theorems ;)
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
40

reflections
Challenging but rewarding when our group effort helped us
to achieve our goals.
- Johannes Matthes
Generally, a very pleasant experience, with a very nice
exchange of knowledge.
- Sara Borjanovic
The teamwork was very
time-consuming. But with
so many participants, you
also have a very wide
range of ideas and can
therefore always find the
best solution.
Working with the other students was a pleasure. Everyone
pulled their own weight, and, when needed, were happy to
offer help to those who were struggling. I never felt that
there were people who were not working enough. Vice versa,
I never felt intimidated by the work rate of my colleagues.
The coworking experience was very comfortable. Much of
this design studio revolved around groupwork, and I always
felt that I could trust my group to finish our tasks.
- Cathal O Brien
- Emily Fuchs
41

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
ONE MORE THING
I WANTED TO SAY:
I found the integration of sustainable practices within the
design studio to be truly admirable, as it strongly emphasized
the importance of environmentally conscious architecture.
- Anja Krnetic
I think this is an enjoyable way to work that exposes
architecture students to real-life practical projects and
encourages a more pragmatic way to approach issues.
I think the level of complexity in the design and material
choice added unnecessary difficulty to the project. A more
simplistic design made from timber would have exposed us
to the same challenges but made them more manageable,
resulting in increased collaboration across teams and a
better finished product.
- Dylan Reilly
I liked how the professors were always open to help us with
different topics, and I also enjoyed having the whole course
in English.
- Antonia Behr
It would have been better if we had started building
prototypes earlier at Materialnomaden.
- Gergely Juhasz
Thanks to our supervisors for giving us the opportunity to
realize our project, I gained new experience on the entire
process of realizing a project. It was extremely exciting to
see our design take shape, and I hope that more design
studios will offer this great chance of enhancing knowledge.
- Marija Klisanin
I would suggest doing such studios also in the future,
because it reflects the real world in architecture a lot better
than the other design studios (which are also important).
Here you had to communicate and apply documents to the
government, work with real materials in a team, and face
problems like budgeting, teamwork, construction, safety...
- Yoan Avramov
If building something, keep your own skills and those of
the people you work with in mind. You get better at it, but
you won’t become a master of the craft in one semester.
Challenge yourself but don’t overdo it.
- Johannes Matthes
42

reflections
Despite all the challenges
and the occasional
frustrations, I really
enjoyed this studio and
the past semester.
I’m really thankful to our mentors Peter Bauer, Sandra Häuplik
Meusburger, and Marillies Wedl for sharing their knowledge
with us in the best way possible, and also inspiring us to
always search for better and more sustainable solutions for
every problem that we faced through the design.
- Eralba Jonuzi
I am very grateful for the last two very fruitful, productive,
and most of all interesting semesters, and I am looking
forward to seeing the result of our work!
- Sara Borjanovic
An unfortunate nature about this module was the reliance
on the Magistrat. I’m not sure if it is possible, but if there
was any way to gain clarity about what permissions we
have been granted by the city in greater time, it would have
taken much of the pressure off the students in the final
weeks of the semester.
- Cathal O Brien
- Dan Pavel Bucur
Thank you for the great topic, task, and time!
- Ekaterina Mihaylova
43

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
PREVIOUSLY ON HB2 & ITI
The Versatile Space Design Series is dedicated to the
experimental development and implementation of
adaptable spatial structures and architectures ready
for construction at a 1:1 scale. The concept of change
is consistently tied to an existing context, such as the
surrounding space and its use.
253.G17 Design Studio
VERSATILE SPACES | construct.deconstruct.reconstruct
In the summer semester 2021 students designed and
evaluated structural variants for their envisioned spatial
design using physical models as well as relevant software.
253.H99 Design Studio
trespassing grounds - creating versatile spaces
253.I93 Design Studio
Constructing Versatile Space(s)
253.J93 Design Studio
Prototyping Versatile Space(s)
253.K28 Design Studio
Evolving Versatile Space(s)
In the summer semester 2022 students focused on the
development of the architectural design in iteration with
the supporting structure, which is constantly optimized
with regard to geometric criteria of structural performance
and constructive design.
In the winter semester 2022 the course took place as part
of the award-winning EXCITE-2022 project ‚Emerging
Fields - TU Trialogue on Urban Co-Production‘. The
developped concept was further developped and built in
spring 2023.
In the summer semester 2023 students developed the
architectural project in line with a dynamic programming
for public space. Selected projects from the `Versatile
Spaces` design series from 2021-2023 served as a starting
point.
In the winters semester 2023 the focus of the design
project for students is on evaluating and further developing
the VE.SH pavilion realized in SS 2023 at Karlsplatz. The
aim is to prepare an optimized and new spatial structure
for construction at the Wittgenstein House in spring 2024.
44

previously on HB2 & ITI
HB2 & ITI
VERSATILE
SPACES
Reviews by Miriam Dall’lgna & Marina Konstantatou,
Foster & Partners
Department of Building Construction and Design
Institute of Architecture and Design &
Department of Structural Design and Timber Engineering
TU Wien
Cover of the first Versatile Spaces Booklet
45

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
STARTING POINT FOR VE.SH
The Versatile Space(s) Design Studios, a collaboration
between the research areas of Hochbau 2 and Structural
Design at TU Wien, have been focusing on innovative
architectural concepts and multidisciplinary approaches
since 2021.
The project received the 2022 EXCITE funding from TU
Wien and gained new partners.
Their main emphasis is on the experimental development
of adaptable spatial structures at a 1:1 scale, with
versatility tailored to the context, such as location and
usage. Future-proof and circular construction practices
play a central role.
During the winter semester 2022, students were tasked
with developing a modifiable spatial structure that
integrates architecture, geometry, resource-efficient
structural planning, and construction materials into a
synergistic overall design.
...a week
in the life
of a passerby...
initial storyboard of a shape-changing pavilion
46

previously on HB2 & ITI
Insights of last semester‘s work
47

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
https://ar.tuwien.ac.at/Forschung/excite-2022#accordion-285230412-collapse-1
48

EXCITE 2022
AWARDED FOR
THE EXCITE
PROGRAM
The Excite Initiative of the Faculty of Architecture and
Spatial Planning focuses on the promotion of outstanding
projects in teaching and research and those which
particularly connect teaching and research. Excite was
launched in 2016 and is the result of the open process
„Parliament of the Questions“, which discussed future
issues and research ideas.
49

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THE PROPOSAL
Architects, Structural and Urban Designers need to join
forces to overcome today’s challenges as well as prepare
for new advances to enable sustainable city and building
design. By unravelling the exceptional quality of the
multidimensional expertise distributed across the three
different research units, Architecture, Structural Design
and Urban Studies of TU Wien, this project aims at
contributing to a sustainable and resilient development.
The ideas is based on expanding the activities related to
the field of ‘emerging fields in architecture’ through
benefiting from perspectives of technology and social
sciences. The project also transports the role of higher
education institutions into the city and society and further
aims at creating encounters to connect. The strength of
this collective learning attempt is in unravelling and weaving
together the two unique existing capacities - the capacity
of the University + the capacity of the City.
The pavilion is envisioned as a performative space
connecting encounters and debates around emerging fields
of architecture with the city and the dedicated urban site.
The program will impart knowledge about the latest
research, design and development in the three research
disciplines, encourage discussion and criticism, triggering
processes of co-production in an interdisciplinary
approach. As an overarching visible element, the structure
itself - by its versatility - communicates the intersection
of Architecture and Structural Design in relation to Urban
Design and to the (changing) context.
It is self-explanatory for the beholder and invites, triggers
even, to discover alternative forms of communication,
learning and teaching, as well as co-production, thus
contributing to a transparent decision-making process in all
fields of design, building and city-making.
The main catalyst of this joint research-based project derives
from previous master design studios on ‘Trespassing
grounds - creating versatile spaces’ wherein students
co-develop a multifunctional transformative pavilion for
Vienna’s open public spaces. Starting at Karlsplatz, as a
site of strong symbolic, cultural and political representation,
in the immediate surrounding of TU Wien, the project will
offer a chance for context-specific, embodied symposia on
urban co-production hosted by the university. It is through
the process of intersecting everyday life spatial practices
with the students in the open public space that the pavilion
will evolve and go further, choosing the new sites following
critical insights that will emerge from these encounters.
50

EXCITE 2022
TEACHING RECONSTRUCTION -
EMERGING FIELDS
The overarching goal of the project is to make remodeling
more visible and accepted in teaching. Currently,
design teaching in general, as well as at the Faculty of
Architecture and Spatial Planning at the TU Wien is still
largely oriented towards new construction projects. Thus,
a large number of graduates hardly come into contact
with projects dealing with existing buildings during
their studies, although in the future, as a consequence
of the climate and energy crisis, reconstruction will
inevitably come to the fore as a field of activity.
On one hand, from a didactic point of view, compared to
new construction, remodeling is a more demanding task
because it usually requires more time and preparation,
and is subject to a narrower scope for design measures.
Discussions about and evaluations of student remodeling
projects are also challenging for all involved because
of their increased complexity and interconnectedness
with a found situation that must first be understood
before any intervention can be meaningfully discussed.
focus is on a number of coordinated initiatives that will take
place over the current summer semester and the coming
winter semester. First, these are parallel design exercises
accompanied by a common social program. Secondly, a fullday
event at the end of the semester with the participation
of international experts in exchange with teachers of the
TU Wien. In parallel, didactic best practice examples of
conversion in architecture teaching at different universities
will be investigated and evaluated. In this way, the range
of possibilities will be collected and shown on the basis of
concrete approaches in order to create a first common
basis. In the end, the collected experiences will be compiled
in an international publication, which has the set goal to act
as an impulse generator for a general reorientation of design
teaching in the direction of reconstruction. of international
experts in exchange with teachers of the TU Wien.
On the other hand, however, remodeling as a task has
the potential to produce interesting and sometimes even
unexpected spatial qualities that would be disproportionately
costly to produce in new construction projects. At the
same time, the different design mode also requires from
the planners a heightened sensitivity and attention to the
existing situation. These are fundamental qualities that will
be increasingly in demand from architects in the future
anyway.
In concrete terms, the project ‚Teaching Reconstruction‘
is explicitly linked to design teaching at the faculty. The
51

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
APPLICANT
Dr. Ing. DI. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger, Senior Lecturer,
TU Wien, Institute of Architecture and Design, Building
Construction and Design (253-05)
PARTNERS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
Burcu Ates, TU Wien, Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban
Culture and Public Space (E285-02), doctoral candidate
Predrag Milic, Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture
and Public Space (E285-02), doctoral candidate
Laura Sobral, Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture
and Public Space (E285-02), doctoral candidate
DI. Marilies Wedl, TU Wien, Research Unit of Structural
Design and Timber Engineering (E259-02), doctoral
candidate
INVOLVED INSTITUTIONS
FROM FACULTY OF
ARCHITECTURE AND THE
TU WIEN IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
Institute of Architecture and Design, Research Unit Building
Construction and Design 2 (E253-05)
Institute of Architectural Sciences, Research Unit Structural
Design and Timber Engineering (E259-02)
Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and Public Space
(E285-02)
52

EXCITE 2022
ABSTRACT
The basic succinct idea of the Emerging Fields - TU
Trialogue on Urban Co-production project is engaging
across three research units of TU Wien, enabling coproduction
processes1 for the design of future living
spaces. This call explicitly relates to faculties core research
fields “Resilience” and “Digitalization” by synthesizing
processes and core values of the research units:
Architecture, Structural Design and Urban Studies.
Architects, Structural and Urban Designers need to
join forces to overcome today’s challenges as well as
prepare for new advances to enable sustainable city and
building design. By unravelling the exceptional quality of
the multidimensional expertise distributed across three
different research units of TU Wien, this project aims at
contributing to a sustainable and resilient development. The
ideas is based on expanding the activities related to the
field of ‘emerging fields in architecture’, which has been
furthered by Dr. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger since her
doctoral studies, through benefiting from perspectives of
technology and social sciences.
Taking this opportunity of creating a collective among
research units - that are usually separated in the academic
system - the project also transports the role of higher
education institutions into the city and society and further
aims at creating encounters to connect. The strength of
this collective learning attempt is in unravelling and weaving
together the two unique existing capacities—the capacity
of the University and the capacity of the City.
The main catalyst of this joint research-based project
derives from a master design studio (codirected by the
proposer) ‘Trespassing grounds - creating versatile
spaces’ wherein students codevelop and possibly co-
build a multifunctional transformative pavilion for Vienna’s
open public spaces. Starting at Karlsplatz, as a site of
strong symbolic, cultural and political representation, in the
immediate surrounding of TU Wien, the project will offer a
chance for context-specific, embodied symposia on urban
co-production hosted by the university. It is through the
process of intersecting everyday life spatial practices with
the students in the open public space that the pavilion will
evolve and go further, choosing the new sites following
critical insights that will emerge from these encounters.
The pavilion is envisioned as a performative space
connecting encounters and debates around emerging
fields of architecture with the city and the dedicated
urban site. The program will impart knowledge about
the latest research, design and development in the three
research disciplines, encourage discussion and criticism,
triggering processes of co-production in an interdisciplinary
approach.
As an overarching visible element, the structure itself
- by its versatility - communicates the intersection
of Architecture and Structural Design in relation to
Urban Design and to the (changing) context. It is selfexplanatory
for the beholder and invites, triggers even, to
discover alternative forms of communication, learning and
teaching, as well as co-production, thus contributing to a
transparent decision-making process in all fields of design,
building and city-making.
1
By co-production we understand the joint production of new knowledge or
technologies between different groups in Society.
53

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
OF THE PROJECT
AND ITS RELEVANCE
FOR RESEARCH-LED
TEACHING, INCLUDING
PLANNED COURSE
CONCEPTS
Prologue
The idea of this project was born following a debriefing of
the Module ‘Emerging Fields in Architecture’. The module
is based at the faculty with the goal to impart current
knowledge from new research fields in architectural and
engineering disciplines, with the aim of dealing with current
and future design challenges in a broader social context in
an interdisciplinary and fundamental way.
The lecturers impart knowledge about different and
interdisciplinary approaches to design, current developments
and results of material and construction research, about
planning and building under/in extreme conditions as
well as about structures that change or develop due to
changing parameters. In this context, strategies for design
(from the initial idea to implementation) are questioned in
an interdisciplinary discourse, and the question of how the
path from idea to realization can be shaped and to what
extent it is possible to be systematically creative is explored.
Lecturers and contributors for this module come from
diverse fields including physics, aerospace and shipping,
psychology and others. It is a knowledge transfer of
latest research and potential future fields or work, but also
a sharing and discussion of creative processes possibly
leading to innovation.2
Last wintersemester, Prof. Sabine Knierbein lectured about
‚Public Spaces‘, and Prof. Peter Bauer about ‘Construction
and Optimization’. It was following the talks and discussion
about future possibilities, that the principal idea for this
project was born.
As mentioned in the abstract, the proposed project is already
embedded into the teaching and research activities of the
faculty. In the summer semester 22, students of the faculty
of architecture will develop a versatile pavilion-like spatial
structure in the frame of the design studio “Trespassing
Grounds - Creating Versatile Spaces”.
It is a follow-up of a collaboration series between the
Institute of Architecture and Design and the Institute of
Architectural Sciences. The projects have been developed
in a co-production process combining methods usually
used in architecture with methods commonly used in
Structural design. With the use of digital and real modelling
tools, the method fits with the greater research topics of
Digitalization. The studio is directed by Dr. Sandra Häuplik-
Meusburger and Prof. Peter Bauer. DI Marilies Wedl is an
Instructor and a joint workshop with the team from Urban
Design is envisioned, following the confirmation of this
proposal.
The pavilion-like spatial structure will be developed
within the design studio with a mixed methodology of
using parametric tools. It shall be versatile, in the sense
that it enables multiple different spatial and functional
configurations. While its name, spatial and functional
appearance is still to be developed by the students, it
will serve as a performative space in which encounters
and debates around Emerging Fields in Architecture will
be facilitated, enriched by fundamental knowledge and
forms of co-production in urban development discussed in
planning and urban studies.
2
Due to Covid-Restrictions, many of the talks had been online. Those can be
watched via: https://www.youtube.com/cEmergingFieldsinArchitecture
54

EXCITE 2022
The Concept
The main catalyst of this joint research-based project is
a versatile pavilion that derives from the master design
studio (co-directed by the proposer) ‘Trespassing grounds
- creating versatile spaces’. By its versatile structure,
it communicates the intersection of Architecture and
Structural Design in relation to Urban Design and to the
(changing) context during the whole process from the
making to its potential use.
Following the initial and preliminary design studio, the
research-led project will run over 12 months and wander
through Vienna touching 3 different locations. While each
of the locations will bring unique aspects to the project, the
principal procedure will be as follows:
PHASE 1: Construction - what will it be?
The starting phase is always the beginning of the
construction and built-up of the structure. By it’s design it
will show the relationship between architecture, structural
and urban planning - also over time. Passers-by can engage
with the team building up. Important lessons learned,
impressions and discussions are all revolving about how we
construct space, how everything is connected, and how
the structure relates – by its details – to the surrounding.
Estimated duration: 1 week
PHASE 2: Using - how do we (want to) live together?
This phase marks the actual use of the pavilion and is
connected to specific events. For each specific site, a unique
program is offered. The program will relate to the research
fields (1) Resilienceand (2) Digitalization communicated
by the diverse views from the three research units. Next
to the overarching idea of the TRIALOGUE, the particular
urban, social, political aspects of each dedicated site will be
emphasized. This will include everyday life spatial practices
of how do we negotiate space? Or what is really needed.
Estimated duration: 2 days up to 3 weeks (depending upon
the program and host)
PHASE 3: Deconstruction - what will be next?
The deconstruction phase is similarly important as the other
phases. Again, we will relate to the research fields from the
diverse expertise of the three involved institutions. This
phase will deal with the question ‚what will be next‘ or ‚what
can be next‘. The discussions and talks may revolve around:
design and building cycles, recycling, re-use and change of
functions, bottom-up and top-to down strategies, as well as
political, social decisions related to the life-cycle of buildings
in relation to their inhabitants.
Estimated duration: 1 week
The purpose of these staged events will be to facilitate
trialogical encounters in relation to the research fields
and to the dedicated environment. Speakers will include
representatives of local communities, urban professionals,
and decision-makers, as well as experts from architecture,
structural design and urban planning. The pavilion
showcases the basic concept of relationships between
space people and time. It is a user-friendly method to
explore the inter-relationship by relating to ‚how it is
built‘ ‚how it is used‘ and ‚what it can be‘.
The Starting Point
The project is supposed to kick-start on the 1st October
2022, in conjunction with the beginning of the winter
semester. The first weeks in October can be seen as the
orientation phase for more than 1000 beginners in the
fields of architecture, engineering and urban planning. It is a
phase for finding out more about the ‘best-fit’ educational
path, but also an important social and net-working event.
We will take this opportunity as a starting point for this coproduction
process in the open public space of Karlsplatz, as
a site of strong symbolic, cultural and political representation,
in the immediate surrounding of TU Wien. The project will
offer a chance for context-specific, embodied symposia
related to the research fields Resilience and Digitalization
as seen and research from the three disciplines of
Architecture, Structural and Urban Design hosted by the
university. It is through the process of intersecting everyday
life spatial practice with the students in the open public
space that the pavilion will evolve and eventually go further
to new sites following critical insights from the emerging
fields at the intersection of the above mentioned research
units.
55

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
While the program is still to be developed by the team and
the students the following ideas are already on the table:
- The best online courses cannot replace the collaborative
learning and teaching setting at the university. Face-toface
interaction among students and faculty is essential
to the quality of teaching that TU stands for. This project
offers the spatial and programmatic frame for a number of
cross-disciplinary talks and discussions.
- Definition of a series of open lectures, to be delivered
in public space addressed to students belonging to the
Architecture Program, the Engineering, and the Urban
studies. The program is open to students from different
backgrounds and disciplines, held by faculty involved in the
research and invited experts. The aim is sharing a common
background of knowledge and to discuss new ideas in
relation to the issue of RESILIENCE of future cities, their
buildings and people.
- After deconstruction of the project at the TU Wien, it will
wander to another public site in Vienna. The exact location
as well as the associated program will be decided following
the acceptance of the proposal and in accordance between
the proposing team as well as the students working on the
design project. Possible locations and preliminary thoughts
include:
- Urban extension areas where the quality of architecture is
so often critically discussed.
- Places of representation for architecture, structural
design and urban design.
Outlook
The ‘pavilion’ - its name, spatial and functional appearance
is still to be developed by the students - serves as a
performative space in which encounters and debates
around emerging fields of architecture will be facilitated,
enriched by fundamental knowledge and forms of coproduction
in urban development discussed in planning and
urban studies.
By its versatile structure, it communicates the intersection
of Architecture and Structural Design in relation to Urban
Design and to the (changing) context during the whole
process from the making to its potential use.
Upcoming research-led teaching activities may include
a follow up of the joint design studio combining all three
research partners. This can be in the form of a combined
design studio or the incorporation of existing programs.
The program and topics that will be discussed will be
selected based on a baseline study with students from the
TU Wien. Students from the course on “Urban research,
living environment and everyday life” and the “Modul
Emerging Fields in Architecture” (WS22) can be involved.
While framing the relevant topics, special attention will be
given to the social, environmental, political, economic and
cultural relevance of these emerging fields in architecture.
These encounters in the open public space on a certain topic
are imagined as embodied pedagogical tools for innovative
learning exercises in the emerging field of transformative
knowledge of and about cities, thus embedding the TU
Wien in its respective urban environment.
Another possibility is the Student-led Exhibition
‘dieRaum22’. A student exhibition will take place in
Belgrade and Vienna with the goal to exhibit relevant fields
in planning both in TU Wien as a public institution, but also
in public space. Involved team members are Predrag Milic,
Burcu Ates and Laura Sobral, all doctoral candidates of the
Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and Public Space.
A cross-disciplinary cooperation with the design studio is
envisioned. In addition, the whole project will be used as
case study for the research-led teaching of the team
members.
The Objective and the Innovative Character
The proposed project adopts two main objectives that
are interconnected to each other and overall define the
innovative character of the project.
(1) The main objective and innovation of this project lies in
the combination of normally three different research and
teaching areas: Architecture + Structural Design + Urban
Planning. This objective contributes to and expands the
development of the ‘Emerging Fields in Architecture’, which
56

EXCITE 2022
has been developed by Dr. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger
since her doctoral studies. As the main idea behind
‘Emerging Fields in Architecture” as an innovative concept
is to impart knowledge about the latest research, design
and development in research disciplines beyond mainstream
architectural topics, the project will encourage this idea by
proposing co-production as a key tool in manifesting new
emergences and possibilities that go radically beyond the
traditional way of thinking, doing and making.
The co-development, co-design and co-building of the
versatile pavilion and instalment of it in an open public
space while proposing it as an urban social agent of coproduction
needs a careful blend of the
three mentioned research focuses.
(2) Taking this opportunity of creating a collective among
different research units, the project also questions the role
of higher education institutions in the city and society.
The second objective of the project therefore is to create
encounters to connect higher education more with urban
life. The strength of this collective learning attempt is in
unravelling and weaving together the two unique existing
capacities—the capacity of the University and the
capacity of the City. By capturing the otherwise segmented
and separated knowledge about the city across different
departments of TU Wien, the project further aims at
enabling the process of learning from and with the city
by positioning itself in selected open public spaces of
Vienna and through co-producing everyday processes,
performances, practices and pedagogies with the inclusion
of invited and interested actors.
The project is expected to generate and multiply benefits
for the Faculty, the Project Team and the general public. The
most important objectives and their innovative character
are highlighted under section 6.
The Methodology and the Way of Working
In order to enable exchange across different disciplines
- research centres - we have conceptualized our
methodological framework around three main pillars,
allowing for knowledge coproduction both within and
across our disciplinary registers. We have embraced the
Urban Trialogue methodological framework, based on the
southern ethic of enquiring in urban studies and feminist
methodological registers from social sciences and
humanities. We would like to combine relationality, situated
knowledge, and power analysis by interweaving these
aspects through an intersectional approach to urban
studies with an explicit focus on social equity and social
change.3 Such a framework will allow us to work in and
with the city by unravelling the potential of the everyday
life spatial practices with students, by envisioning and coproducing
their projects in relationship with space, in both
social and material terms in 1:1 scale.
Our question driven approach, in the open public space
of Vienna will engage the three research centres in a
creative trialogue about space production through space
co-production. By stepping out in the open public space
the project will offer a new environment for students
with an increased complexity in which multiple methods
(interviews, observations, lab situations, among others)
will be used to unravel and weave together specialized
knowledge embedded within our disciplines. Each site will
offer us a unique set of inputs calling for a context-specific
spatial intervention in their response.
While such a methodological framework will allow us to
productively exchange across our research centres, it will at
the same time allow us to further our current and ongoing
research:
- On habitability in extreme environment, in particular
the commonalities between different lived and built
environments (253-05),
- Everyday life and public space (E285-02),
- and complex structures translating demands from the
disciplines mentioned above into a specific, tangible built
environment (E259-02).
3
see Naples, 2017; Peake, 2017; Gaventa, 2006; Bargetz 2017; among others
57

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
The Expected Results
With the unique possibility to do this research-led project
in a cross-disciplinary team, the proposing team members
expect to:
(1) expand their current knowledge and activities in their
individual research fields as well as (2) discover new issues
in relation to the other research fields. All proposing team
members are based at or connected via their research
activities to the TU Wien and to the particular research
areas of the TU Wien. With this project, we also expect to
(3) contribute largely to the profile development of the
Faculty of Architecture and Spatial Planning. This project is
also expected to (4) trigger new corporations, projects and
funding partners. Last but not least (5) Involved students
will largely benefit from the interdisciplinary work and thus
have a long-lasting sustainable effect on following design
studios and courses.
Particular output includes:
- A signature spatial structure, presenting and embodying
the research areas RESILIENCE and DIGITALIZATION
- A radio broadcast series in the frame of the Radio
Spaceuriosity on Radio Orange.4
- Social media & online activities Website for archiving
research-driven materials, videos, online exhibitons
- Book, Articels and conference proceedings
4
https://o94.at/programm/sendereihen/spaceuriosity
The Structural Effectiveness and the Contributiosn
to the Profile Development of the Faculty of
Architecture and Spatial Planning
The project offers multidimensional contribution; to the
Faculty, to the Project Team and to the general public.
This allows for co-development of scenarios of “How we
can live together” and “What kind of spaces we need
for this”, which will ultimately be linked to the queries for
“Emerging Fields in Architecture”. As such questions require
for a multi-actor process, including urban professionals
(architects, structural designers, planners, urban designers)
and everyday actors such as local communities and local
governments, the project will encourage and empower
the emergence of new fields in architecture, laid in the
intersection of the encounters of different actors during
the project.
Contribution to and Innovation for the Faculty
The project reveals its innovative character in regard to
its contribution to the Faculty. It is built upon a unique
cooperation between three research units of the Faculty.
When the results of this interdisciplinary collaboration is
presented and disseminated, it is hoped that its logic will
be spreaded and consequenced with new collaborations at
the Faculty. The closeness in between the research units is
a chance, not only for this project, but also for the future.
The project further aims at contributing effectively to the
research priorities of the Faculty. In addition to the existing
three research foci, “Social infrastructure”, “Resilience” and
“Digitalisation”, the project tenderly intends at proposing
“Urban Co-production” as the fourth prospective
research priority. This will allow for more interdisciplinary
collaborations and partnerships across the Faculty and the
University and create possibilities for new field research on
the topics connected to everyday life in the cities, inclusive
urbanism and architecture, critical spatial practises, critical
urban pedagogies, fair policy transfer, etc.
Through the wider dissemination of the project as detailed
under section 7, the project and therefore the Faculty will be
recognised more throughout Vienna, Europe and beyond.
The messages and results of the project will be shared
among various academic and professional networks of the
project team members. This effort is expected to provide
wider recognition of the Faculty and to enable the University
to get connected with its surroundings, the society and
diverse networks of it.
Contribution to and Innovation for the Project Team
members
The intensive cooperation between the disciplines of
58

EXCITE 2022
urban planning, architecture and structural engineering
promotes and deepens mutual understanding. This is
an indispensable basis for efficient, but also spatially and
aesthetically demanding solutions to problem-solving in the
building sector. The pavilion sees itself as a public visible
contribution to meet the future requirements arising from
reuse, Resource conservation and resilience.
By this unique cross-disciplinary cooperation innovative
and new topics will be revealed and discussed in an open
way, leading to new results. The collective initiative will for
example contribute to the integration of emerging fields in
architecture on an educational and research-driven level.
It will further enable the applicant to compare her findings
from everyday living in an extreme physical and socialpsychological
environment with the related architectural
themes in an urban context. Some of the already revealed
communalities include the topics of territoriality, personal
and social spaces as well as the relation between built
and perceived space. It is expected to find further
commonalities between these different environments
that can be integrated into the actual building design and
educational activities.
The project overall contributed to the research collective
from The Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and
Public Space upon their doctoral dissertation studies.
As the three doctoral candidates study around the joint
research foci on ‘urban co-production’, this research
project will enable them to test their approach through
an interdisciplinary exchange and collaborative structural
design, where the former focuses on co-production of
knowledge while the latter stands for the very tangible,
physical result of a co-production process.
immediate contribution, the project will generate new
meanings around doctoral dissertations of Burcu Ates,
Predrag Milic, and Laura Sobral. As part of her study on
‘institutional pedagogies’ that informs how the teaching
and learning practice are delivered, Burcu Ates is interested
in engaging with the project through her doctoral research,
by further mapping and analysing the pedagogical tools and
methods adopted throughout the project process. Predrag
Milic, via his engaged experience in working with local
communities, intends at translating the learnings of the coproduction
process, that covers the dialogues with locals,
to the conclusions of his own research.
Based on her various research on public policies, Laura
Sobral is further interested in the relations with
local governments and their possible involvement in the
process, through which she can test the impact
of co-production in city-making.
Contribution to and Innovation for the general public
The project will contribute to the general public via the
process and results of the co-production.
The versatile pavilion as a result of the project will be an
urban social agent which is expected to generate new
encounters with the public and invites their participation
to use and appropriate the structure. The pavilion will also
serve as a gentle intervention in the public space which
provides dissemination of the knowledge co-produced
within various prospective performances, actions and
events under/around the pavillion.The project will also
showcase the collaborative work of the Faculty, and how
important an integral design approach for the processing of
complex tasks is.
It is strongly believed that both material and immaterial
results of the project will empower the three earlycareer
scholars to observe, analyse and understand the
potentialities of collaborative teaching and learning formats
in an interdisciplinary project environment. It is hoped that
the three doctoral candidates will extend the learnings of
the project to wider contexts connected to
academia and various professional networks. As an
59

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
DESIGN TASK FOR THE SEMESTER
The overall goal of the designstudio prototyping versatile
spaces was to experimentally develop a constructionready
1:1 formulation and to implement a pavilion-like spatial
structure [pavilion: free-standing, lightweight building]
with different spatial and use configurations. The proposed
architecture is intended to formulate the framework for a
symposium that discusses the cited areas of tension.
Exemplarily, the project is to be built over a period of one
year at different locations in Vienna. The design will be
conceived in this design up to the 1:1 structure and will be
tested at least in parts as a mock-up.
60

design task
Poster for the announcement of the design studio, credit: project Ve.SH, photo: Milomir Milenkovic
61

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
DESIGN RELEVANT ASPECTS
This iteration of the studio culminates in constructing the
final pavilion on-site in front of the University. Additionally,
the developed program for the pavilion was further
expanded, including possible cooperation and day-to-day
operations during its first stay at Resselpark. The spatial
formulation was based on an in-depth analysis of geometric,
constructive, and programmatic principles. For this reason,
the following four principles were initially studied:
1. TEMPORARY PLACES IN PUBLIC SPACE
Various pavilions were examined for their specific properties.
Among other things, this involved checking what a pavilion
should offer and in which locations it might be suitable.
3. CONSTRUCTIVE FINESSE AND DETAILING
Since the design requirements vary depending on the
material and geometry, particularly efficient and resourcesaving
connections were investigated. The analysis ranged
from simple wood angle connections to self-supporting
structures of different material types.
2. SPATIAL GENEROSITY AND RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
o create different structures and shapes, a wide variety
of materials were investigated for their properties to be
able to create the most sustainable and diverse structure
possible. This included simple structures, recycled materials,
membrane architecture, and even inspiration from nature.
4. CURRENT DISCOURSE AND PROGRAMMING
A pavilion is a flexible architectural open space that invites
people to come in and spend time in it. As meeting places
and shelters, pavilions can be social centers for activity,
debate, and celebration. Its program should invite people to
integrate, interact, and view their environment in new ways.
62

design task
VERSATILITY
INTELLIGENT DESIGN =
spaces : the PASSAGE, the ROOM and the STAGE
Sunblinds are arranged to create modeular versatile
CONFIGURATION
22 nd district of Vienna, which was scheduled for demolition
Sunblinds are reclaimed from an OMV building in the
VISIO N
THE BOX
THINKING OUT OF
Sunblinds are manipulated and assembled to
create a patch consisting of inner and outer frame
TRASH
= RESOURCE !
DEMOLITION
VISIO N
TRASH ?
63

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
DESIGN PARAMETER: THE MATERIAL
During the participatory design process, a conscious
decision was made to exclusively use reused building
materials. In collaboration with Materialnomaden, aluminum
blind slats were employed, originating from the demolition
of the former OMV building in Vienna. By reusing the slats,
not only is a sustainable design solution created, but it also
meets the requirements for resource-efficient construction.
Based on all these aspects, the controversial name of our
pavilion emerged: Ve.sh, for ‚Versatile Trash Pavilion.‘ To
use the aluminum slats as a structural element required
a profound exploration of geometric and constructive
principles.
Aluminium blinds
OMV building, Grellgasse, 1210, Vienna
64

design task
Material Analysis
5mm
30mm
1mm
12mm
m
20mm
Chemical Properities
5mm
Section and Elevation of a blind
99mm
- Chemical element AI
- 3rd mostfrequent element
- Density 2.7g/cm 3
- Melting point 660.32°C
- Boiling point 2467°C
- Tensile strenght 49 Mpa
- Stiffness 70.000 MPa
Characteristics
- Height: 0.02 m
- Length: 1.09 m
- Width: 0.099 m
- Thickness: 0.001 m
- Weight: 0,39 kg
Processing Methods
- Extrusion producing bars, wires and pipes
- Rolls reduce the thickness
3D drawing of a blind in Detail
- Forging/Smith classical manufacturing
process
65

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
DESIGN PARAMETER: THE LOCATION
From four possible locations for the VE.SH (Versatile Trash) pavilion, Karlsplatz - according to students - was the best
choice.
The exact location between the subway station exit and the main entrance of the TU Wien served as a great host for
the most diverse and curious crowd, from very young pupils going to school, fellow colleagues, professionals, and people
strolling around the Ressel Park.
Location analysis by Cathal O Brien Karlsplatz, 1010 Vienna
66

design task
Site plan of the Passage/ Karlsplatz, 1010 Vienna
67

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
68

the
VVERSATILITY
MATERIALS
project development
the ROOM
sunblinds
aluminum
reused
TRANSFORMATION
textile membrane
MATERIALS
ERSATILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
casted concrete
footings
TRANSFORMATION
strips
LED
reused
nylon
rope
sustainably
powered
the
PASSAGE
STAGE
69

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
COOPERATION WITH IG ARCHITEKTUR
Throughout our entire process, we invited several architects
to whom we presented our project and its current status.
The initial guests were Clemens Nocker and Fritz
Schöfflauer from IG-Architektur, who attended our lunch
lecture. They provided feedback and highlighted various
aspects that we still needed to address.
One of these aspects related to construction: How would
we anchor our pavilion to the ground? Should we employ a
foundation, or are there alternative options? If a foundation
were to be utilized, it was suggested that we create
prototypes and test them on a model.
Another aspect concerned the pavilion‘s surface texture.
The choice of material is crucial, as each material imparts
a distinct appearance and experience within the pavilion.
Are we planning to cover the entire pavilion, or will some
patches remain open? Do we have a solution for rainy
weather?
Apart from construction and design considerations,
emphasis should be placed on defining a clear theme for
the program. The pavilion‘s essence should be reflected
in the program, and vice versa. How can we achieve this
integration? Could workshops and lectures on recycling
and reuse serve this purpose?
Furthermore, what is the distinct function of VE.SH? Failing
to answer this question might result in it being perceived as
a sculpture rather than a pavilion.
To guide us through these inquiries, they advised us to
seek the simplest methods and answers. By doing so, we
can extract the best qualities from the pavilion and fully
appreciate the process and program in June.
Instagramm Story from ig_architektur
70

project development
Pictures of the lunch dialouge
71

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
PROGRAM CURATION GROUP
The ve.sh (Versatile Trash) Pavilion is intended to provide
the framework for a symposium, for which a program
featuring events and dialogues in accordance with soughtafter
topics around architecture and sustainability was
developed
From the students protocol:
As architects, we want to take responsibility - starting
with the details, extending to the urban planning and social
aspects - and realise a sustainable pavilion as a prototype
for future building projects. The programme of the pavilion,
which is made of recycled materials, deals with topics
related to precycling, recycling and resource efficiency. The
entire design process is an interdisciplinary project between
architecture, structural engineering, spatial design and
design.
HOW ?
The vision for the future is to design a pavilion whose
supporting structure and shell are made of recycled
materials. In addition, these should be deconstructable and
thus be able to be reintroduced into the material cycle.
The shell is to be created as an interactive process
between students and visitors. The pavilion is intended
to attract attention through its architecture but also
through its programming, to stimulate reflection and to
create a platform for exchange in order to address circular
construction methods. The pavilion should not only be seen
as a statement but also as a process in which the interface
between all architects and lay people is increased.
72

project development
73

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
Urban Trialogue Conceptual Drawing
74

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
INSTRUMENTALISING
PUBLIC SPACE AS
AN EMANCIPATORY
PEDAGOGY FOR URBAN
CO-PRODUCTION
Text by Burcu Ates, Laura Sobral and
Predrag Milic
Public spaces are at the centre of debates in architecture and
urban studies. They are vital in the initiation of encounters,
exchanges, and creativity, as well as unexpected or less
welcomed interactions among people. Public spaces, thus,
host and exhibit–stage–to the co-existence of diverse
urban populations in cities. As “sites that offer relief from the
burdens of subjective life facilitating mutual engagement,
and so mutual obligation and loyalty” [1] public spaces play
a crucial role in reimagining the urban landscape as dynamic
and transformative, especially when thinking of different
social groups taking place, which fosters social learning and
embodied knowledge exchange.
On the other hand, contemporary cities are characterised
by an excessive level of regulation that governs public
spaces. These regulations encompass various rules and
bureaucratic processes aimed at managing urban spaces
that are meant to accommodate public life. Yet, nowadays,
it is getting more widely recognised that public spaces
should possess a democratic potential, allowing for various
forms of expression and fostering collective participation
and collaboration in city-making. So that public spaces, as
sites of encounter, can become spaces of co-production
and the cultivation of collective imagination [2] In light
of these discussions, we aim to recognise public spaces
75

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
from a relational perspective [3] by epistemologically and
practically excavating it as a “network of people, places and
connections” [4].
In this positioning, we argue that public spaces are not
only generators of urban co-existence but also social
learning. Public spaces are “often provided and managed
by the state” and “used by the society as a whole” [5],
yet by challenging established power dynamics and
promoting inclusivity, they can be instrumentalised as part
of emancipatory pedagogies for architecture and planning
education, which may invite students to embody everyday
life realities while situating themselves in a context. In such
a way, students and educators, that is, Universities, will
likely contribute to democratic city-making by empowering
individuals and communities to envision and co-produce
the city they desire collectively.
In this context, as a part of the EXCITE initiative, we delve
into the design studio on „Prototyping Versatile Space(s)“
with the objective of building a common understanding of a
conceptualisation of public space as a powerful opportunity
for emancipatory pedagogy that encourages urban coproduction.
Following the program and engaging with the students,
we shared our view of public space as an ‘open-air
classroom’ facilitating informal learning, encouraging a
sense of belonging, and allowing for social cohesion. To
illustrate this conceptualisation, we embraced a workshop
setting as a pedagogical experiment where students and
mentors explored the co-designing and co-building of the
graphical recording of the workshop with students
76

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
VE.SH Pavilion installed at Karlsplatz, Vienna. Settled in
one of the prominent public spaces of the city, the pavilion
engaged with contemporary discourses and challenges in
architecture and spatial planning, such as the creation of
temporary spaces in public areas, the integration of spatial
generosity, and the sustainable use and conservation of
resources, and we aimed to capture this collective learning
experience.
[1] Sennett, R. (1999). Growth and failure: the new political
economy and its culture. Spaces of Culture: city, nation, world,
London: Sage, pp. 23-24; Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities:
reimagining the urban. Polity Press.
[2] Ober, J. (2008). The original meaning of “democracy”:
Capacity to do things, not majority rule. Constellations, 15(1), 3-9.
[3] Lofland, L. H. (2017). The public realm: Exploring the city‘s
quintessential social territory. Routledge; Lefebvre, H. (2009).
The Production of Space. Blackwell; Knierbein, S., & Domínguez,
M. C. (2014). Relational public space as a connector of urban
studies. Gestion y Ambiente(Online), 17(1), 69-85; Tornaghi,
C., & Knierbein, S. (Eds.). (2014). Public space and relational
perspectives: New challenges for architecture and planning.
Routledge.
[4] Knierbein, S., & Domínguez, M. C. (2014). Relational
public space as a connector of urban studies. Gestion y
Ambiente(Online), 17(1), p. 72.
[5] Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city.
Routledge, p. 98.
77

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
WORKSHOP ON URBAN
CO-PRODUCTION
Conceived as a short workshop format, the session
included a brief introduction to the concept of “urban coproduction”
followed by a discussion around the semester
design project and a collective vision mapping exercise with
the students. Equipped with the ‘lenses’ of co-production,
we collectively examined and discussed the case study
with students in an attempt to anticipate and plan the
process of inserting a pavilion in the public realm of Vienna.
The relevance of this exercise has been in ‘zooming out’
of the design process–temporarily shifting perspective–to
recognise and discuss some of the non-spatial aspects that
are intrinsic to the project. At that point, the exercise was
built upon fundamental questions of why, with whom, how,
and where, with the intention of triggering other questions
that may deepen students’ connection with the sociospatial
context:
What kind of public space is Karlsplatz?
Who manages and governs it, and who uses it?
Who is allowed in Karlsplatz, and who is not?
What do you think about the inclusivity of this
public space?
What should be the purpose of a pavilion in
Karlsplatz, and to whom(s) should it serve?
Where is it most needed?
What is the main message you want to convey
through this project?
How can you communicate your message
through the pavilion in a public space like
Karlsplatz?
What kinds of public needs can the pavilion
accommodate?
How do you envision the pavilion to be used in
the future?
With the questions above and their spontaneous variations
illustrated below, students were able to immediately reveal
the less visible yet important aspects of their design projects
and gained more situated command over the design
process. The workshop was of further use to illuminate
power distribution among actors by valuing lived experience
and analysing everyday knowledge, thus reconsidering the
ethics and the positionality of those involved in delivering
projects in public space, such as the VE.SH pavilion at
Karlsplatz. We collectively recognised the potential of
the co-production process to serve social change by
borrowing participatory action research techniques while
acknowledging that any action or activist research scheme
needs to be complemented by a solid embedding of citymaking
processes in different forms of social critique.
While we were weaving a collective vision triggered by the
questions above, many others were immediately generated
by students:
So co-production is, for me now, after everything,
finding solutions through working together. That‘s
how I feel. And it‘s connected with a lot of stuff, like
how people work. How do you work with an issue,
how do you bring different people, so you have like a
bigger horizon? And how do you make the ideas work
together so you can achieve something or so you can
create something that‘s beneficial for all the actors
in the process? Can a design process show a better
understanding of the power structures and different
levels of it? How everybody could be responsible for
their own vision by connecting the understanding of
different people? Like for me, designing with three
people having their own visual field, we cover each
other at certain points. (student 1)
Co-production, for me, is clearer now; it is about
cooperating together and making a deeper analysis
like we‘ve done for today. Like, for example, what is our
idea of the Pavilion? What kind of people that it can
attract? So, it‘s like we need to think more deeply and
make a deeper analysis of all that we made. (student 2)
78

My open question is how we can, at best, distribute
power between experts and non-experts. For me, coproduction
would be about trust and respect. Respect
for other people‘s needs and requirements and trust in
yourself and others. (student 3)
The basic succinct idea behind co-production in city-making,
we concluded, is in recognising the multidimensionality
of the design process and the value of diversity in urban
life and development. We expanded our understanding of
the design process from its object to its action form and
increased our capacities to distinguish between the cause
and the effect of the design process [1]. Perceived in such
a way, urban co-production appears to be both an aim and
a tool to democratise city-making and society as a whole
– a prospect many students recognised as worth further
investment.
After today, I kind of understand more the importance
of engaging and reaching wider groups and having
them involved in the development of a project. And
that‘s what I‘m going to take with me for the rest of
this project. (student 4)
So, for me, co-production has a lot to do with different
people working together and for the sake of achieving
a common goal. And, during the process, it is about
knowing each other’s best skills so we can all work
together and help each other out to reach that common
goal. And what I took from today, I think definitely the
right choice of approach, how to address different
profiles, different population groups and engage them
on different levels. (student 5)
I‘ll go home today with a better understanding of
how public spaces work. Co-production for me is now
realising a vision together with other people by always
collective feedback round at the end of the workshop

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
80

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
keeping in mind the questions of who, how, when
and what to find the best possible solution for these
questions. (student 6)
This perspective, however, as it has been noticed, requires
the specific capacities of those engaged with the coproduction
process. Above all, sensitivity, respect for
all those involved and recognition of the limits that are
implicitly and inherently a part of it. By recognising the
limits of the common, often conflictual attempts to make
a society in the condition of plurality, urban co-production
enables us to think of a renewed and honest social contract
for more people-centred, and therefore also sustainable,
urban policies and actions, shaped and developed by
constructive conflicts [2]. Thus, urban co-production as a
conflict-sensitive concept recognises power discrepancies
among differentiated participants of the design process
and, therefore, calls for continual reflexivity throughout the
process.
For me, co-production after today‘s workshop is
mindfulness because two heads are better than one.
And the best way to enable this is your provocative
questions. They showed that we thought we had the
vision, but we forgot so many questions. And it‘s a good
way to achieve mindfulness by asking as many people
as possible about their priorities, because we are all
different, and it‘s the best way to achieve a sustainable
goal to exchange ideas and then combine them into one
good idea that will work. I think I take with me today
that it‘s about the people, not the building, because we
can build it maybe, or we will build it, but if there are no
people there at the pavilion, it doesn‘t make any sense
because it is for the people, not for us. (student 7)
I would still consider co-production as a process of
recognition of each other and of the world around us.
What I take from this session is a much more tangible
feeling about what our project is, who are we as
a group, and what is within our powers to do in this
society. And what I take is the realization that even
if a group of people for whom we might think about
graphical recording of the workshop with students
that is a very homogeneous one, a big diversity is there,
and that there are diverse realities, as you show today.
Actually, I mean, I feel that we could understand each
other here. And also, what you said made me reflect,
and I started to think the other way around. And then I
feel that we are building something together here, and
it‘s a very good feeling. (student 8)
We concluded the workshop with a feedback round
of participants recognising that the design studio on
„Prototyping Versatile Space(s) offered students a chance
to recognise the relevant stakeholders and associated
public and consequentially inform their design choices
accordingly. This short yet informative exercise embraced
the ongoing design project of students and built up new
sensitivity around urban co-production within it, thus
empowering students to make more just, context-specific
and socially sustainable design decisions in their attempt to
further democratic society.
We are thankful to the whole design team for having a
chance to involve ourselves with such design matters, and
we appreciate the brave attempt of the University to take
a more active part in city-making. We are convinced that
it is precisely at the intersection between disciplines and
through cross-sectoral approaches to democratising our
societies that new fields of knowledge will emerge, and
we hope our contribution offers evidence for this quest to
endure.
[1] Easterling, K. (2004). The action is the form. Continuum, 85.
[2] Misselwitz, P. (2016, September 6). Conflicting partnerships:
Governance and urban challenges. Habitat III - Sustainable Urban
Development. https://www.boell.de/en/2016/11/09/conflictingpartnerships-governance-and-urban-challenges.
81

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
GEOMETRY APPROACH
In the course of our precedent analyses and exploration of
spatial configurations where unconventional architectural
forms and their associated structural systems naturally
complement each other, we discovered a beautiful
interrelation. This connection lies in the ability to construct
complexly curved shapes with simple elements and
surfaces exhibiting special curvature behavior, known as
Minimal Surfaces.
Physically, Minimal Surfaces can be modeled by placing a
closed metal wire into a soap film. The surface formed by the
soap film, due to its isotensoid behavior, seeks to minimize
its surface area, hence the name. In digital modeling, various
approaches approximate Minimal Surfaces.
Because of their unique curvature behavior, certain Minimal
Surfaces can be arranged periodically. By combining single
surface patches with constant curvature transitions, we
create what are known as (Triply) Periodic Minimal Surfaces
(TPMS), and these arrangements can be repeated infinitely.
82

geometry development
way more resistent against external conditions.
straight elements bend which makes them
its area, caused by the
Min. because
surface
behind min. surfaces
it locally minimizes
tension
Minimal surface with soap film.
BASE
logic
together,
1.
can
The
the
Patches assembled
following
LOGIC
5.
surface curvature the
D TORSION
AN BENDING
GEO METRY
3.
the
4.
GEO METRY
2.
same geometry occurs at intervals. It
be exploded into
PERIODIC MIN.
SURFACE
smaller parts many times.
Following
straight and repeatablecomponents
SIMPLE AND
initially
STRAIGHT
simple,
Because of modularity, very
structure.
can be used to build such a
BY EMBEDDING A DESIGNINAGEOMETRICALLYCORRECTWAY,VERYCOMPLEXSHAPESCANBEPRODUCEDEFFECTIVELYWITHSIMPLEMEANS!
83

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
GEOMETRIC DEVELOPMENT
Instead of digitally simulating the physical behavior of soap
film, we utilized the following procedure to model Minimal
Surfaces:
1. We project a regular polyhedron onto a sphere and
subdivide and optimize its edges such that they lie directly
on the sphere.
Polyhedron
Koebe polyhedron
2. By applying a special transformation, known as the
Christoffel Dual construction, we swap diagonals and
corresponding edges (this method was made available by
Marilies Wedl; for theoretical background, refer to Pottman
2007, ‚Architectural Geometry,‘ p.700). Through this
process, we compute Discrete Minimal Surfaces.
Starting with a regular polyhedron provides a level of
regularity, allowing for the combination of single patches.
On the right-hand side, we present different subdivisions
of a sphere and corresponding periodic Minimal Surfaces
Christoffel Construction
Combination
84

geometry development
Belinski Dodecahedron
Bilinski Dodecahedron
Deltoidal Hexecontahedron
Square Bifrustum
t
Rhombic Tricontrahedon
Analyzed polyhedra and their resulting Mesh arrangements
85

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
DIGITAL WORKFLOW - COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN
During the first workshop, it was demonstrated how to construct beam surfaces with a parametric beam height, compute
connecting elements, and orient them according to the surface curvature.
Derived from the winter term studio ‚Constructing Versatile Space(s),‘ a module called a ‚patch‘ was defined as a building
unit for the structure. Describing one patch can be achieved within a bounding box. This characteristic simplifies the
assembly process, making it more intuitive. The two shorter edges of a patch align with the bottom of the bounding box
and coincide with two edges on the bottom rectangle. The longest edges represent the diagonals of two neighboring faces
of the box, meeting at the vertex opposite to where the two shorter edges converge.
models from the previous workshop were created in the first workshop with DI Marilies Wedl
86

geometry development
Six patches assembled together, each with an adjacent longer edge, create another unit that can also be described within
a larger bounding box. Following the same logic, the minimal surface can grow endlessly, but, more importantly, the same
patch or assembly of patches occurs at intervals. This periodicity makes the minimal surface periodic.
Due to its modularity, very simple, initially straight, and repeatable components can be used to construct such a structure.
Following the surface curvature, the straight elements twist, causing the structure to be initially internally strained.
one patch with bounding box
six patches assembled together
87

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
CONFIGURATIONS
The Passage serves as an information point highlighting innovative sustainable structures and stands as a tangible example
of the reuse of reclaimed building materials. This configuration is characterized by openness and invitation, connecting
various directions of Karlsplatz, including the main entry to the TU Wien and the entrance to one of Vienna‘s largest
subway stations – Karlsplatz. The design accommodates passersby by offering shelter, potential for lectures, and exhibition
space. Furthermore, it enables users to engage in diverse activities within and around the pavilion.
This configuration comprises the maximum number of patches (22). The dimensions of this layout are approximately 7m x
9m, with a tunnel height of 2.5m and a peak height of 3.7m for the entire structure.
88

geometry development
The Room takes form as a semi-closed space that facilitates visitors‘ movement in and out while simultaneously
encouraging them to linger within a nook-shaped segment of the pavilion. Comprising the WALL and the STAGE, it
provides an environment where individuals can immerse themselves in the exhibited content and participate in educational
activities such as lectures, seminars, and workshops.
The 22 patches used for the PASSAGE configuration are distributed between the STAGE (16 patches) and the WALL (6
patches). The STAGE measures 7m x 6m and stands 2.8m high, while the WALL configuration spans 5m x 1.25m with a
height of 2.5m.
Positioned similarly to the ROOM, the Stage encloses a nook-shaped space. With one side enclosed, it serves as a
backdrop for public speeches, lectures, brief input sessions, performances, and musical events. Simultaneously, it opens
towards Resselpark, effectively functioning as an auditorium. This configuration comprises 16 patches.
89

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR AND ANALYSIS
The main structural elements in our configuration are the
beams, materialized with recycled aluminum sun blinds.
Due to their folded profile, the beams are challenging to
bend but easy to twist. The twisting strains the profile, thus
impacting the inner stress state.
To gain a better understanding of the structural behavior
of our three spatial configurations, we implemented a
structural analysis workflow in a parametric evaluation
environment using the Karamba3D add-on for Grasshopper.
To make this work, we had to adapt our solid 3D model to a
line-based Finite Element (FE) model.
The convenience of having repetitive elements became
evident during the simulation setup. We only had to compute
all the structural elements for a single patch, and we were
able to multiply all the important geometric and structural
information by reorienting the initial patch together with its
encoded information
FE Simulation „The wall“
The simulation provided feedback on the structural strength
and global deformation, serving as a basis for further design
decisions, such as the placement of membrane infills and the
detailed construction and positioning of the foundations.
The picture on the left-hand side shows the geometry
input for the FE Analysis, while the picture above heavily
exaggerates the global deformation of the structure.
Nodal Model for FE-simulation
Parametric Implementation
90

geometry development
TRANSFORMATION
The human scale of the patches allows for their assembly
without the need for additional technical support. Twentytwo
patches are necessary for constructing the various
pavilion configurations.
In the first configuration, all the patches combine to create
a freestanding structure serving as a passage, aptly named
‚THE PASSAGE.‘
In the second phase, the initial structure is deconstructed,
and the 22 patches are rearranged to yield two new
freestanding structures: ‚THE STAGE‘ with 16 patches and
‚THE WALL‘ with 6 patches. These two structures can
be utilized separately or in combination, creating a novel
configuration that transitions to the third phase: ‚THE
ROOM.‘
These three configurations harmonize with the adaptable
design conceived for the expansive space of Karlsplatz. The
new pavilion embodies an innovative concept, contributing
sustainably to the future. Each configuration provides a
distinct spatial experience and can accommodate varying
numbers of people for diverse programs.
Floor plan of the Passage
Floor plans of the Stage/Room
Passage
sag
Elevation of the Passage
Wall
Elevations of the Room/Stage
91

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
PROTOTYPING & CONSTRUCTION
As we modeled our patch and designed the pavilion using
CAD, we began constructing prototypes at a 1:1 scale. We
developed several versions with different connections to
assess stability.
Materialnomaden not only provided us with a workspace
but also essential equipment.
92

prototyping and construction
in
lamella
leftovers after cutting
Clipping out the
the right angle
Bending the
the rivets
the holes for
Drilling
Making
the cuts with a circular saw
E
I N
L
the edges after drilling
Riveting
Drilling in
the new holes
PRODUCTION
PRODUCTION
the dierent parts
Assembling
Marking
the cutting
templates
L
I N
E
END
<---
Connecting the
inner & outer frame
Drilling out the existing rivets
<---
Dissasembly of
START
the roller shutters
Connecting the patches to each other
93

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
STRUCTURE & ELEMENTS
Multiplication of patches
Outer Frame - defining contour
The morphological configuration of a patch is primarily governed by its outer frame, serving as the defining contour.
This outer frame is initially taking the shape of a a basic cubic form, that allows multiple configurations through rotating.
Comprised of three ninety-degree angles and one sixty-degree angle, the patch exhibits geometric harmony.
The outer frame consists of six window blinds interlocked through overlapping joints. However, when considered in
isolation, this framework lacks the inherent self-supporting capability required for its intended purpose. To overcome this
limitation, an additional structural component, referred to herein as the inner frame, must be introduced.
Multiple Outer Frames connected
Foto of the Outer Frame - lack of self-support
94

prototyping and construction
The achievement of optimal structural integrity within our architectural framework required the incorporation of an auxiliary
system, colloquially known as the inner frame. This planar configuration, adhering exclusively to the quadratic paradigm,
features only ninety-degree angles.
The inner frame is securely attached to the outer frame using screws, ensuring a cohesive bond between the two
components. Moreover, the inner frame serves a multifaceted purpose, one of which involves its capacity to act as
a captivating medium for the exhibition of various construction techniques. Adorned with printed texture pieces, this
ensemble not only enhances the aesthetic allure of the pavilion but also provides an invaluable avenue through which
passersby may gain deeper insights into our research endeavors and upcoming lectures scheduled to take place within the
pavilion‘s confines
Inner Frames
Inner and Outer Frame = Patch
Multiple Patches (Inner and Outer Frames)
connected
95

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
JOINTS - EXPLORATIVE DEVELOPMENT
The connections between the patches, like the aluminum
frames, are crafted from reused materials. We utilized 2mm
steel plates, cleaned of rust, cut to proper dimensions, and
drilled to create holes. Subsequently, they were bent and
welded to form various types of connections.
Joint planning
Connection for six patches Connection for four patches Prototypes of the joint
96

prototyping and construction
Different types of connections used in the pavilion
Convex
Concave
97

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
FOUNDATIONS - EXPLORATIVE DEVELOPMENT
The development of the pavilion‘s foundations presented
multiple challenges.
Firstly, the complex cross-section of the aluminum lamellas
made it difficult to attach fixtures to the structure.
Secondly, due to the twisting along the length of the
elements, they point to the ground at varying angles.
Moreover, as the principal axis around which the lamellas
twist remains at a fixed height, they lose contact with the
ground along their length. As seen in the picture, showing
the perspective view, the element initially touches the
ground, but as it twists around its principal axis (marked in
red), it gains ground clearance.
Persepective view of the lamella with its axis marked in red
This effect becomes even clearer in the front view of the
lamellas. The principal axis is again marked in red, denoting
the geometric center of the cross-section. Marked in
black are the positions of both ends of the lamella. Here,
it‘s evident that, while the axis remains fixed, the lamella
first stands up vertically but eventually aligns parallel to the
ground.
Front view of the lamella. Its starting and ending positions are highlighted
in black, its axis in red
98

prototyping and construction
These factors had to be considered during the development
of the foundation. The solution we devised was to encase
the lamellas in a cylinder with the principal axis as its center.
This approach ensured that, regardless of the angle at which
the lamella was twisted, the foundation would maintain
contact with the ground. It also enabled the use of a single
type of footing throughout the entire pavilion, eliminating
the need for various variations for different positions within
the structure. The iamges on the right 4 and 5 illustrate the
effect of the cylinder, resulting in a rounded cross-section
around the actual lamella.
Front view of the lamella encased in a cylinder
Casting of the lamellas in a cylindrical shape
99

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
Initial run of the production process
100

prototyping and construction
To create the cylinders, we chose concrete, as it can be
poured into a mold and shaped to the desired specifications.
Within the mold, cut segments of the lamellas were used to
form halves with the appropriate contours for attachment
to the final structure. Sections of PVC pipe were used as
the molds due to their simple ability to consistently achieve
a uniform diameter and perfectly round shape.
On the left, you can observe an initial test run of the
production process, starting from the cast with the lamella
insertions to the splitting of the foundation into its two
halves. These halves can then be affixed to the structure
using hose clamps.
101

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
In addition to the cylindrical foundations, which primarily
serve as footings, the pavilion needed to be secured against
wind forces. The lightweight lamellas have the benefit of
easy transportation; multiple patches can be carried by a
single person. However, the downside of this lightweight
design is that the assembled pavilion itself is not heavy
enough to resist wind forces. To protect the final structure
from being carried away by strong winds or even removed
by unauthorized persons, it needs to be either fixed to the
ground or sufficiently weighed down.
Due to its location on Karlsplatz, fixing the pavilion to the
ground was not an option. The underlying pavement could
not be damaged by tent pegs or other fixtures; therefore,
the decision was made to weigh down the pavilion. The
necessary weight was calculated by a member of the
design team using Rhino, Grasshopper, and Karamba3D.
The position of the weights was crucial as the method of
attachment depended on their position within the structure.
The final decision was to place them in the corners of the
pavilion because there, the inner and outer frame form
triangles that lie flat on the ground and could, therefore, be
weighed down without the frame needing to support the
added weight.
Plan
Section
102

prototyping and construction
Various methods for weighing down the structure were
considered, and the initial choice was to cast custom
concrete weights that partially rest on the footing within the
triangle formed by the inner and outer frames and partially
on top. However, realizing that creating the molds would
be too time-consuming, especially considering the need for
differently shaped weights for various configurations, the
plan was revised. Instead, it was decided to cut stone plates
into the right sizes.
The two molds that were already made were still utilized
for the ‚wall‘ configuration of the patches. The stone design
was ultimately overridden for aesthetic reasons, and the
already cut stone plates were repurposed as a base for a
flowerbed that now serves to weigh down the pavilion.
Casting of the concrete weight
103

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
The construction of the cast for the concrete weights
proved challenging because they were intended to partially
sink into the structure for added security. To achieve this,
PVC pipes were cut in half to create a rounded fit at the
bottom of the weights, allowing them to sit smoothly on
the footings. The development and construction of the
molds took about two days, and the concrete needs to cure
for at least ten days.
For aesthetic reasons, the idea of using stone slabs instead
of concrete was abandoned in favor of the flowerbeds
The stone plate
A mockup of the flowerbed foundation
104

prototyping and construction
105

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
PATCHES AND INFILL VARIATIONS
The repetitive load-bearing structure of a patch allows for
various ways of utilizing its inner surface. After analyzing the
most suitable materials and their characteristics and testing
them through mockups, we produced four infill variations.
These variations are strategically positioned (colored in
blue) in each pavilion configuration to complement their
respective programs:
INFILL: EXHIBITION MEMBRANES (green)
Infill for Wall
Some patches are filled with membranes made of mesh
fabric. This mesh fabric is waterproof, wind-permeable, and
flame-retardant. Additionally, it can be printed and labeled
with both waterproof and washable colors.
Within the patches, a rectangular area of 83 x 104 cm is
reserved for this membrane, creating a smooth and legible
surface. To achieve this, the membranes are stretched with
the aid of strings attached to the six eyelets.
Infill for Stage
Infill for Passage
The patches are filled with information about the va.sh
pavilion. Furthermore, there are vacant areas on the mesh
fabrics that visitors and guests can utilize to exchange and
convey information, thus becoming part of the project.
These membranes serve not only as a surface for
information but also provide shade for visitors. Moreover,
they confer an envelope to the structure that shapes,
defines, and frames the space that has been generated.
This distinction solidifies the demarcation between interior
and exterior spaces.
106

prototyping and construction
INFILL: STRING (yellow)
The string infill serves as a semi-transparent component
of the pavilion‘s skin. Due to its lightweight nature, it is
primarily positioned in configurations where loads need to
be minimized. This placement provides shading while still
offering viewers a glimpse of the interior activities.
Various designs and materials were tested, including rubber
joints, jute rope, and acrylic yarn. Although these showed
promising results, they were deemed suboptimal due to
characteristics like softness, elasticity, or fragility. The final
selected material, sustainably sourced nylon rope typically
used for tying hay bales, aligns seamlessly with the pavilion‘s
core vision and fulfills the material requisites.
GEOMETRY (yellow)
Patch with string
The geometry infill belongs to the category of string infills,
utilizing the same material. However, its purpose extends
to serving as an educational tool, visually representing the
geometric principles of minimal surfaces
INFILL: LIGHT (blue)
The light infills are integral to the pavilion‘s nighttime
presence. Comprising three light patches, they consist
of 6-meter-long LED strips affixed to the inner side of
the outer frame. The diffused light from these LED strips
accentuates the outer frames – the primary geometric grid
and the asymptotic lines. Additionally, these three light infills
can individually change their colors in accordance with the
program or music.
Infill representing geometric principle
Patch with lightning
107

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
Membrane Patch infill
108

prototyping and construction
Various Patch infill details
109

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
PRODUCTION LINE
During the planning phase, the students devised a production
line for preparing the lamellas. To add an element of
interest, they engaged in group competitions to determine
speed. The entire process was meticulously documented to
calculate the time required for preparing and constructing
one patch, thereby finalizing the prototyping timeline. The
subsequent steps were undertaken during this process:
1. Commencing with the sunblinds, which necessitated
disassembly using a screwdriver to obtain individual lamellas.
2. Following this, the rivets connecting the lamella to the
sunblind mechanism had to be drilled out. Subsequently,
the lamellas underwent cleaning and drying.
3. To facilitate hole drilling and cuts, the sunblind required
marking. To ensure consistency, a stencil was developed for
precise markings in uniform positions.
4. Accurate outcomes relied on consistent positioning. The
marked holes were then drilled using a 4 mm bit, as were
the cuts.
5. Cuts were executed using an angle grinder and a 1 mm
cutting disc.
6. Completion of the preparation phase necessitated
clipping out the flange.
7. The sunblind was now ready for folding.
8. and 9. Subsequently, a hole had to be drilled where the
lamella overlapped, permitting rivet insertion to reinforce
the corner.
10. Upon finishing all corners, all components had to be
interconnected.
11. Once both the inner and outer frames were finalized,
connection ensued via rivets.
12. The ultimate step in the process was interconnecting
each patch to the others.
1. Disassemble
5. Make cuts for bending
9. Rivet the Edges
110

prototyping and construction
2. Drill out the rivets
3. Mark the Lamela
4. Drill the holes
6. Clip out the leftovers
7. Bend the Lamela
8. Drill holes for the rivets
10. Put the parts together
11. Connect the inner & outer frames
12. Connect the patches
111

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
112

prototyping and construction
113

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
LOGISTICS
SITE SURVEY
A site survey was conducted at Karlsplatz to confirm the pavilion’s location and determine the number of packers
required to fill gaps between the ground and the pavilion foundations. Additionally, a visual survey ensured the absence of
obstructions such as walls, trees, or furniture that could hinder the proposed locations for the Passage, Stage, or Room
configurations.
For site topography analysis, a leveling device was employed. The leveling head atop the tripod was positioned at a
fixed location and height above the ground. The height of each point was established in relation to point 0. This was
achieved by vertically holding the leveling stick at the point and reading the measurement through the eyepiece of the
leveling head. The heights were documented in a table and subsequently input into Rhino software to generate a mesh
representing the topography. Upon placing the pavilion model onto the mesh, potential gaps between the structure and
the ground can be identified.
630
- 1.19m
- 0.73m
- 0.60m
- 0.95m
- 0.59m
- 0.63m - 0.55m - 0.49m - 0.34m - 0.23m
- 0.09m
5 5 5 5 5 5
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
Point 3
Point 2
Point 1
Point 6
Point 5
Point 4
+ - 0.00m
Point 0
+ 0.03m
Point Height in relation to point 0
0 +0.00 m
1 -0.09 m
2 -0.23 m
3 -0.34 m
4 -0.49 m
5 -0.55 m
6 -0.63 m
7 -0.95 m
8 -1.19 m
9 -0.73 m
10 -0.60 m
11 -0.59 m
12 +0.03 m
site plan and section
Table with measured heights
114

prototyping and construction
ELECTRICITY
Concerning the program, electricity is required for
equipment such as evening lighting, speakers for lectures
during events, and a refrigerator for cooling beverages.
The following options could provide us with electricity:
1. Cable-stayed bridges:
It is feasible to rent a cable from TU Wien and extend it
to our pavilion. However, complications arise due to the
cable‘s length and challenges in complying with street
wiring regulations.
2. Cable-stayed bridges from the nearest café:
Running a cable from the nearest café is a simpler option
than a direct connection from TU Wien.
3. Rent a battery for electricity provision:
This solution isn‘t suitable for our needs due to the
gasoline-based charging method, which conflicts with our
commitment to recycling, reusing, and sustainability.
DELIVERY PROCESS
Another task involved devising a strategy for transporting the
equipment from the assembly location to the construction
site, given that the primary site for preparations and
assembly was at Materialnomaden. Their facility is located
at Gudrunstrasse 11, roughly 4.4 km away from the ultimate
destination, Karlsplatz.
115

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
CONSTRUCTION DAY
Monday, 19th of June: We are ready!
116

prototyping and construction
musicianplayingmusic...
hearing street a
y
family,
passing...
just work, wo
to ...rushing
w rk, just passing...
8:45am
MONDA
MONDAY 8:45am
D Y
lunchwith
sunday the ...going to
1:00pm
SUNDA
1:00pm
SUNDAY decides
work, wo
after home ...going
in
time some
book...
a reading sun the
w rk, decides
6:00am
TUESDA
TUESDAY 6:00am
D Y
STORYBOARD
STORYBOARD
11:00pm
A 11:00pm
SATURDAY
D Y
A URDA
SAT
y ..
...at the party... party.
spend
to
wo ...w
s
group of people upon a
sittingandhavingdrinks
sittingandhavingdrinks...
...was working late, on thewayhomestumbling
. a
WEDNESDA
9:00pm
WEDNESDAY 9:00pm
w rking late, on the wa
D Y
w y home stumbling
k ...
THURSDA
4:00pm | 4:45pm
THURSDAY
D Y
...at the oce
4:00pm | 4:45pm
| at Resselpark...
D Y
FRIDAY 8:00pm
...after reading the program,decidedto
go on a date
FRIDA
8:00pm
to the open air-cinema at pavilion...
117

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
VERSATILITY & PROGRAM
After the complete assembly of the Pavilion, there was a 10-day program according to the provided schedule, lasting from
the 20th of June until the 30th of June.
The Opening Event took place on the 20th at 18:00 and was followed by a social bar evening. Over these 10 days, the
pavilion itself was transformed from its initial form, the Passage, to the Room, and finally to the Stage.
The Lunch Dialogues started at 11:55. During the dialogues, the role of architecture in creating a sustainable future was
the main topic. Processes such as planning, construction, use, recycling, and reuse were discussed by architects and
associated professionals, who openly shared their opinions and experiences with us.
The Pavilion concluded with the Finissage Event at 18:00 on the 30th of June, which, similar to the Opening, was followed
by a bar night.
21 - 29 June 23
Opening
Bar night
Lunch Dialogue
Lunch Dialogue + Workshops
Finissage
Bar night
01 02 03
04 05 06 07
We 21. Th 22. Fr 23. Sa 24. Su 25. Mo 26. Tu 27. We 28. Th 29.
Assembly
PASSAGE ROOM STAGE
Disassembly
Transformation
Transformation
timeline of the program
118

Lunch Dialogues 5 to twelve
ration the maximum number of patches (22) is used.
exhibition. It also facilitates users to develop dierent activities in and around the pavilion. For this conguway
station. Its shape allows the people passing by to benet from its use as a shelter, lecture space &
tions of the Karlsplatz such as the main entry of the Technical University Vienna and the subbuilding
materials.. It is an open and inviting conguration which connects dierent direcvative
sustainable living structures and is a standing example of re-use of reclaimed
R O O M
Fr 23.
03
Th 22.
02
Sa 24.
We 21.
TRANSFORMATION
Su 25.
which
space allows visitors
closed
to come
semi
seminars, and workshops. The 22
a
lectures,
represents
patches used
of format
for
conguration
the in
themselves
ROOM
educate
The
and tent
WALL and the STAGE, it creates a space where one can immerse themselves in the exhibited conout,
but also invites them to spend some time inside of the pavilion. Consisting of the
The PASSAGE conguration oers space as an information point about innothe
PASSAGE conguration are divided in the STAGE (16 patches) and the WALL (6 patches).
Mo 26.
05
04
Di 27.
06
S T A G E
5 TO TWELVE
Lunch Dialogues 5 to twelve
5 TO TWELVE
07
We 28.
5 TO TWELVE
The STAGE conguration is a nook-shaped space located at the same position as the ROOM. Being closed
on one side, it creates a background for public speeches, lectures, performances and music events, while it is opening
one can educate themselves in the format of lectures, seminars, and workshops. The 22 patches used for the PASSAGE
more time inside of a u-shaped part of the pavilion. Consisting of the WALL and the STAGE, it creates a space where
08
Th 29.
Vernissage 18.00
5 TO TWELVE
Finissage
01
(DIS-)ASSEMBLY
towards the Resselpark at by that it attracts passing people. At the same time invites them to spend some
conguration are divided in the STAGE (16 patches) and the WALL (6 patches).

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
CONFIGURATION ROOM
120

prototyping and construction
121

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
TRANSFORMATION DAY
Sunday, 25th of June Transformation from Room configuration to Stage configuration
122

prototyping and construction
123

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
CONFIGURATION STAGE
124

prototyping and construction
125

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
DISASSEMBLY DAY
Fridey, 30th of June Disassembly of the VE.SH pavilion
126

prototyping and construction
127

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
TEAM
128

Funded as part of the EXCITE Programms 2022
Fakultät für Architektur und Raumplanung, TU Wien
team
Thanks to our partners!
is also reflected
finesse and detailing. The
reusing building materials,which
in public space, spatialgenerosity
and ressource conservation,aswellasconstructive
pavilion addressescurrent discoursesandareasoftensioninarchitecture
the architecturalprinciples.Theresulting
temporary places
an in-depth analysisofgeometricandconstructiveprinciples,
The project was developed in the line with a dynamic programme
for public spaces. The spital formulation is based on
the premise of
which were consolidatedwith
and urban planning, suchas
future visions
- that is ve.sh pavilion.
An architectural space that refelcts
from
V E.SH
sustainable, ecology and
in the programme.
pavilion arose
ÜBER UNS
ABOUT US
niederschlägt.
Prinzipien zusammengeführtwurden.DersoentstandenePavillonthematisiertaktuelleDiskurseundSpannungsfelderinArchitekturundStadtplanung,
Das Projekt wurde im Rahmen eines dynamischen Programms
für öffentliche Räume entwickelt. Die räumliche
Formulierung basiertaufeinereingehendenAnalysedergeometrischen
und konstruktivenPrinzipien,diemitdenarchitektonischen
unter der Prämisse derWiederverwendungvonBaumaterialien,diesichauchim Programm
von Ressourcen,sowiekonstruktiveFinesseundDetaillierung.DerPavillonentstand
temporäre OrteimöffentlichenRaum,räumlicheGroßzügigkeitundSchonung
welcher nachhaltige, ökologische und
zukünftige Visionen wiederspiegelt
V E.SH
Ein architektonischer Raum,
- das ist derve.sh Pavillon.
a project by
TU WIEN INSTITUT FÜR ARCHITEKTUR UND ENTWERFEN
FORSCHUNGSBEREICH HOCHBAU – KONSTRUKTION UND ENTWERFEN E 253/5
UNIV.PROF. IN ARCH. IN HEMMA FASCH
129

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
THE
STUDENTS
Raphael Auffarth
Dan Pavel Bucur
Gergely Juhász
Ekaterina Mihaylova
130

team
Yoan Avramov
Peter Babos
Antonia Behr
Sara Borjanovic
Emily Marlena Fuchs
Elsa Gjinaj
Vanessa Jäger
Eralba Jonuzi
Marija Klisanin
Anja Krnetic
Krystsina Masilevich
Johannes Matthes
Uros Miletic
Cathal O‘Brien
Dylan Reilly
Rok Zidar
131

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
TEACHING TEAM
Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger
Studio Director. TU Wien, HB2
Dr. Ing. Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger is Senior
Lecturer at the Institute for Architecture and
Design. Her teachings include design courses in
space architecture and extreme environment
architecture and a regular course on ‘Emerging
Fields in Architecture’. Sandra is also Academic
Director of the Executive MBA at the TU Wien
and the Space course at the Science Academy
in Lower Austria. She is an architect at spacecraft
Architektur and expert in habitability
design solutions for extreme environments.
Over the last 15 years, she has worked and
collaborated on several architecture and
aerospace design projects. Sandra is Chair of
the AIAA Space Architecture Technical
Commitee, and Co-chair of the IAA History
Committee. She is author of several scientific
papers and books, her latest is co-authored
with Sheryl Bishop; Space Habitats and
Habitability (Springer 2020).
132

team
Peter Bauer
Studio Director. TU Wien, ITI
Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Peter Bauer is university professor
for Structural Design at the TU Wien and
teaches at the Academy of Fine Arts, he is the
vice president of the engineering consultants
of the ZiviltechnikerInnen Vienna, Lower Austria
and Burgenland; state authorized civil enignieer
and head
of the structural engineering office Werkraum-
Ingenieure with a focus on structural
enginieering; member of the building standards
committee in the International Association for
Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) and
the AG BIM.
Marilies Wedl
Lecturer. TU Wien, HB2
Dipl. Ing. Marilies Wedl is a passionate architect
based in Vienna, Austria. With a keen interest in
computational design and algorithmic thinking,
Marilies brings a unique perspective to her
work, employing cutting-edge technologies to
push the boundaries of architectural
possibilities. Working in a Vienna-based
architectural office, Marilies has successfully
tackled projects ranging from local social
housing initiatives to exceptional international
endeavours. In addition to her professional
work, Marilies holds a position as a university
lecturer at TU Wien, where she promotes the
potential of emerging technologies and
engagement in constrained design approaches
that prioritize efficiency and sustainability of
complex architectural shapes. Marilies is
currently pursuing a PhD at the department of
Structural Design and Timber Engineering
under supervision of Univ. Prof. Peter Bauer in
the field of rationalization of freeform
structures with focus on jointing systems.
Guests, Critics and Supporters
We thank ...
... our critics for their valuable input: Hemma
Fasch, former Professor, HB2
Peter Kneidinger, Materialnomaden
Clemens Nocker and Fritz Schöffauer, IG
Architektur Lunch talks
... our 5 before 12 Lunch Dialogue guests for
the inspiring conversations about our future:
Katja Schechtner, Werner Sobek, Bazon
Brock, die Materialnomaden, ig-Architektur,
Janina Gloria, children from Volksschule
Braunhubergasse and their teacher Jan
Braula, and our Excite Team.
... IG Architektur and Amelie Schlemmer for
hosting us.
... Peter Kneidinger from the Materialnomaden
for this fruitful cooperation and hosting us at
the Kegelhalle.
... Peter Melichar from karlsplatz.org for
supporting us in making this happen at
Karlsplatz.
133

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
IN COOPERATION
WITH
Materialnomaden
Company
Materialnomaden offer expertise in architecture,
urban planning, construction implementation
and restoration, art and design, as well as
structural design and guided self-construction.
With this pioneering work, we are taking important
development steps to advance circular
processes in the construction industry.
Seeing the built environment as an existing
resource means for us, as a co-creator of building
culture, to be able to draw on an enormous
potential, which we adapt sustainably to needs
and uses that are permanently in flux.
By means of concrete implementation projects,
consulting activities, the creation of prototypes
and the mediation of re:use building components,
we demonstrate the constructional,
architectural and artistic added value of projects
in which the found material is at the center.
https://www.materialnomaden.at/
134

team
IG Architektur
Association
IG Architektur is an Austria-wide community of
interests of architects. Since its foundation in
the year 2000, it has offered an open platform
for the 2000, it has provided a space for the
discussion of architectural, professional and
socio-political topics, which are carried from
professional practice into discourse and from
discourse into professional practice. In addition,
IG Architektur has been active since 2006 in
the Chamber of Civil Engineers since 2006,
where it actively participates in professional
decision-making processes.
karlsplatz.org
Association
karlsplatz.org aims to connect the art, culture,
and educational institutions located at and
around Karlsplatz with the purpose of fostering
sustainable cultural revitalization of the
Karlsplatz area.
https://karlsplatz.org/
IG Architektur is committed to fair professional
conditions for all architects, for the improvement
of the competition and award culture, for
the anchoring of building anchoring of building
culture in everyday life, for professional dialogue,
knowledge transfer and for raising theness
of society for architecture, landscape
architecture, urban and spatial planning.
https://www.ig-architektur.at/home.html
135

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
EXCITE
TEAM
Some of the research was funded as
part of the EXCITE Programs 2022,
Faculty of Architecture and Spatial
Design, TU Wien
Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger
Applicant, Senior Lecturer and Researcher. TU
Wien, HB2
Dr.Ing. DI Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger is Senior
Lecturer at the Institute for Architecture and
Design. Her teachings include design courses in
space architecture and extreme environment
architecture and a regular course on ‘Emerging
Fields in Architecture’. Sandra is also Academic
Director of the Executive MBA at the TU Wien
and the Space course at the Science Academy
in Lower Austria. She is an architect at spacecraft
Architektur and expert in habitability
design solutions for extreme environments.
Over the last 15 years, she has worked and
collaborated on several architecture and
aerospace design projects. Sandra is Chair of
the AIAA Space Architecture Technical
Commitee, and Co-chair of the IAA History
Committee. She is author of several scientific
papers and books, her latest is co-authored
with Sheryl Bishop; Space Habitats and
Habitability (Springer 2020).
Burcu Ates
Affiliated Researcher & PhD Candidate.
TU Wien, SKuOR
Burcu Ates is an architect, urban researcher
and nature & culture conservationist. After
completing her Bachelor’s in Architecture and
Minor in City Planning at Middle East Technical
University in 2012, she has been involved in
several research projects, design processes,
and activist movements in Ankara, Berlin, Istanbul,
and Vienna. She has taught courses on
Basic Design, Urban Design and Landscape,
Architectural Representation, and Building Tectonics
at various universities. She has served as
a Board Member and Executive of several committees
at the Chamber of Architects Ankara
Branch. She is currently conducting doctoral
researches on mapping the bodyscapes of migration
at the Department of Architecture at
METU and on alternative institutional pedagogies
in the architectural design studio at the
Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and
Public Space (SKuOR) at Vienna University of
Technology, where she works as an affiliated
researcher.
136

team
Predrag Milic
Senior Scientist, Doctoral Candidate, TU Wien,
SKuOR
Laura Sobral
Doctoral Candidate. TU Wien, SKuOR
Marilies Wedl
Doctoral Candidate, TU Wien, ITI
Predrag Milic is an activist scholar trained as an
architect and urban researcher working between
urban development and critical pedagogy,
particularly with the oppressed, silenced,
and poor people of Belgrade‘s urban periphery.
He is a co-founder and a scientific coordinator
of the Action Research Centre Škograd and a
research and development coordinator of the
Who Builds the City Association from Belgrade.
Positioned as an affiliated researcher at the
Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and
Public Space at the Vienna University of Technology,
Predrag is pursuing a doctoral degree on
the topic of Social Infrastructure of Hope and
contributing to the platform Urban Trialogue.
He is a part of the teaching team of the master‘s
program Social Design – Arts as Urban Innovation
of the Faculty of Applied Arts.
MSc. Laura Sobral is an architect and urban
planner who began her activist engagement as
part of the Right to the City movement, focusing
on public spaces in São Paulo, Brazil. She is
currently developing her PhD on the mobility of
public policies for public-social cooperation
through a cotutelle between the ISCTE– Instituto
Universitário de Lisboa and TU Wien. Laura
is the author of the book Doing it Together –
cooperation policies for the city co-governance,
edited in English, Portuguese and Spanish.
Laura is co-founder of the civil society
organization The City Needs You Institute,
which works internationally with experiments
and arrangements for the shared management
of public spaces. She is a German Chancellor
Fellow with the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
Marilies Wedl is a passionate architect based in
Vienna, Austria. With a keen interest in computational
design and algorithmic thinking, Marilies
brings a unique perspective to her work,
employing cutting-edge technologies to push
the boundaries of architectural possibilities.
Working in a Vienna-based architectural office,
Marilies has successfully tackled projects ranging
from local social housing initiatives to
exceptional international endeavours. In addition
to her professional work, Marilies holds a
position as a university lecturer at TU Wien,
where she promotes the potential of emerging
technologies and engagement in constrained
design approaches that prioritize efficiency and
sustainability of complex architectural shapes.
Marilies is currently pursuing a PhD at the
department of Structural Design and Timber
Engineering under supervision of Univ. Prof.
Peter Bauer in the field of rationalization of
freeform structures with focus on jointing systems.
137

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
FUTURE PROSPECTS
In the winter semester of 2023, the focus of the design
project for students is on (1) evaluating and (2) further
developing the structure realized in the summer semester
of 2023 at Karlsplatz. The aim is to prepare an optimized and
new spatial structure for construction at the Wittgenstein
House in spring 2024.
„They think that philosophy is a difficult business,
but I can tell you: compared with the difficulties of
architecture, it is nothing at all.“
Ludwig Wittgenstein (translated)
The inspiration for the design series is drawn from the
current context. The goal is to analyze and question current
issues in the areas of environment, society, and construction.
Simultaneously, the role of architecture in the future of
construction and the contributions architects can or should
make are being considered. A realized project is regarded as
a ‚phase‘ of a design and construction process. The focus
is on finding intelligent ways to reuse existing materials. The
pavilion is also optimized and reused, following the principle:
(re)Design – to (re)Built – to be (re)Used.
Starting point and inspiration: ve.sh Pavilion – SS 2023:
https://www.instagram.com/vesh.hb2
138

future prospects
Poster for announcement of Design Studio, credit: project Ve.SH Pavilion
139

prototyping versatile space(s) | HB2 & ITI
HB2 &
prototyping versatile space(s)
Architecture Design Studio 2023
Published by
TU Wien
Institute of Architecture and Design
Research Unit of Building Construction and Design 2 - HB2
www.hb2.tuwien.ac.at
© 2023, Research Unit for Building Construction and
Design 2 - HB2 – TU WIEN
140

The versatile space(s) design series is dedicated to the experimental development and implementation
of 1:1 adaptable spatial structures and architectures. The adaptation is always closely linked to an
existing context, such as the surrounding space and its intended use. During the summer semester of
2023, students had the opportunity to design, develop and construct a pavilion at Karlsplatz, infront of
TU Wien. In addition to the requirement of transformation, we set the goal of constructing the pavilion
using only reused building materials. In collaboration with the Materialnomaden, we repurposed blinds
slats from the demolition of a former ÖMV building in Vienna. Through the intelligent reorganization
of building patches, numerous design possibilities emerged, due to a specific surface curvature. As a
result, three configurations, the passage, the stage, and the room, were developed and presented as
part of the accompanying event program, the 5 before 12 Lunch Dialogues from June 21st to June
30th 2023.
Involved Students: Raphael Auffarth, Yoan Avramov, Peter Babos, Antonia Behr, Sara Borjanovic, Dan
Pavel Bucur, Emily Marlena Fuchs, Elsa Gjinaj, Vanessa Jäger, Eralba Jonuzi, Gergely Juhasz, Marija
Klisanin, Anja Krnetic, Krystsina Masilevich, Johannes Matthes, Ekaterina Mihaylova, Uros Miletic,
Cathal O’Brien, Dylan Reilly, Rok Zidar
Teaching Team: Dr. Ing. DI Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger, Prof. DI Peter Bauer, DI Marilies Wedl
A cooperative design studio by the Research Units: Building Construction and Design 2 - HB2 -
E253.5 and Structural Design and Timber Engineering - ITI E259-02
with the Excite 22 Team: Dr. Ing. DI Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger, Burcu Ates, Predrag Milic, Laura
Sobral, DI Marilies Wedl
ProjektpartnerInnen: Materialnomaden, ig Architektur und Karlsplatz.org
5 vor 12 Lunch Dialog PartnerInnen: Katja Schechtner, Werner Sobek, Bazon Brock, die Materialnomaden,
ig-Architektur, Janina Gloria, children form the school VS Braunhubergasse and their teacher Jan Braula,
and former HB2 Prof. Hemma Fasch
ISBN 978-3-9519864-3-2 -TU Wien, Research Unit of Building Construction and Design - HB2
HB2 & ITI prototyping versatile space(s)