11.12.2023 Views

InRO Weekly — Volume 1, Issue 11

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SXSW 2023<br />

filmed, but we’re treated to incredible footage of its setup,<br />

backstage, crowd, and the surreal motorcycle caravan that<br />

escorted John and Yoko from the airport to the field (one of the<br />

film’s best sequences). This isn’t exactly a by-the-book concert<br />

documentary <strong>—</strong> we don’t get full performances from any artist <strong>—</strong><br />

but it still manages to convey a palpable energy from each<br />

performance. The film is also chock full of endless amazing rock<br />

anecdotes: from the birth of Alice Cooper and his unhinged<br />

on-stage antics, to the undeniably weird yet forward-thinking<br />

avant-garde of Yoko Ono, to the crowd raising a sea of lighters to<br />

welcome Lennon to the stage (now a time honored practice at<br />

every concert ever). Yet it’s Chuck Berry’s performance that<br />

proves to be the film’s standout sequence. Backed by a group of<br />

teen musicians he’d never played with before, Berry overflows<br />

with joy and charisma. And there’s something so pure and bygone<br />

about his performance that it’s simply a marvel to see on screen.<br />

The wealth of talent interviewed for the film offer great insight<br />

into the significance of the day <strong>—</strong> as well as lend it more humor<br />

than expected. Two particular highlights are Edjo Leslie, a<br />

rough-riding heartwarming Santa Claus and founder of the<br />

Vagabonds Motorcycle Club who provided security detail and<br />

funds for the show, and Rush’s Geddy Lee, who was in attendance<br />

that day and apparently tripping balls. The only two living artists<br />

not featured are Yoko Ono (who declined to appear) and Eric<br />

Clapton (who never responded to the filmmakers’ requests). Both<br />

polarizing figures, Clapton’s presence isn’t particularly missed,<br />

yet Ono’s would have added an extra dimension to the story given<br />

her complicated legacy, love story with Lennon, and unapologetic<br />

boldness she demonstrated on stage in Toronto.<br />

“… observing how it all came<br />

together is a thrilling part of<br />

the ride.<br />

Over the 50 years since the decade that transformed culture as<br />

we now know it, many moments have been recognized as the<br />

symbolic end of the idealistic ‘60s <strong>—</strong> from the police riots at the<br />

1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago to the murders<br />

of MLK and RFK to the disastrous Altamont Speedway Free<br />

Festival. Even more have been given for the end of The Beatles.<br />

The Toronto Revival invigorated Lennon with the confidence he<br />

needed to leave the group, sparking music’s greatest divorce.<br />

Given the incredible legacies swirling in Toronto during that<br />

summer of ‘69, Revival is a welcome addition to the history books<br />

and concert doc canon (and yet further required viewing for<br />

Beatles fanatics who need no convincing). Brimming with both<br />

revelry and reverence, Revival69 remembers a time when<br />

anything felt possible and arrives at a moment when we could all<br />

use a little bit of the optimism that felt so potent back then and<br />

so foreign to us now. It’s a welcome trip down a memory-holed<br />

alley of memory lane.<strong>—</strong> NICK SEIP<br />

ANOTHER BODY<br />

Sophie Compton & Reuben Hamlyn<br />

A sobering reminder of the minefield the Internet can be for<br />

women, the documentary Another Body, from filmmakers Sophie<br />

Compton and Reuben Hamlyn, is perhaps one of the more<br />

unnerving recent examples of form being shaped by subject<br />

matter. We’re introduced to college-aged engineering student<br />

“Taylor.” “Taylor” is ambitious, academically accomplished, and<br />

outwardly happy until one day she learns from an apologetic<br />

male friend that there is a video on a popular porn website which<br />

appears to feature her engaged in an explicit sexual act. “Taylor”<br />

is mortified to discover that the video is not actually her but is a<br />

deepfake. For those blessedly unfamiliar with the term,<br />

deepfakes are a controversial form of video where, using<br />

commercially available software and A.I., “regular people”<br />

(although, boy, is that a relative term) are able to create<br />

photorealistic, full-motion facsimiles of human beings appearing<br />

to say and do things that they otherwise never would. Alarm bells<br />

first sounded about this technology years ago, primarily in<br />

anticipation of it being employed to spread disinformation and<br />

potentially swing elections (Jordan Peele even made a PSA on<br />

the subject back in 2018 which made convincing use of his<br />

Obama impersonation). However, as with all emergent<br />

technology, it’s primarily been applied toward pornography. More<br />

specifically, creating reasonably convincing video clips where<br />

everyone from movie stars to politicians to amateur citizens can<br />

have their faces nonconsensually imposed upon porn actors, at<br />

which point the videos are uploaded online and viewed by<br />

millions of people.<br />

This may be the appropriate place to discuss Compton and<br />

<strong>11</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!