You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SXSW 2023<br />
filmed, but we’re treated to incredible footage of its setup,<br />
backstage, crowd, and the surreal motorcycle caravan that<br />
escorted John and Yoko from the airport to the field (one of the<br />
film’s best sequences). This isn’t exactly a by-the-book concert<br />
documentary <strong>—</strong> we don’t get full performances from any artist <strong>—</strong><br />
but it still manages to convey a palpable energy from each<br />
performance. The film is also chock full of endless amazing rock<br />
anecdotes: from the birth of Alice Cooper and his unhinged<br />
on-stage antics, to the undeniably weird yet forward-thinking<br />
avant-garde of Yoko Ono, to the crowd raising a sea of lighters to<br />
welcome Lennon to the stage (now a time honored practice at<br />
every concert ever). Yet it’s Chuck Berry’s performance that<br />
proves to be the film’s standout sequence. Backed by a group of<br />
teen musicians he’d never played with before, Berry overflows<br />
with joy and charisma. And there’s something so pure and bygone<br />
about his performance that it’s simply a marvel to see on screen.<br />
The wealth of talent interviewed for the film offer great insight<br />
into the significance of the day <strong>—</strong> as well as lend it more humor<br />
than expected. Two particular highlights are Edjo Leslie, a<br />
rough-riding heartwarming Santa Claus and founder of the<br />
Vagabonds Motorcycle Club who provided security detail and<br />
funds for the show, and Rush’s Geddy Lee, who was in attendance<br />
that day and apparently tripping balls. The only two living artists<br />
not featured are Yoko Ono (who declined to appear) and Eric<br />
Clapton (who never responded to the filmmakers’ requests). Both<br />
polarizing figures, Clapton’s presence isn’t particularly missed,<br />
yet Ono’s would have added an extra dimension to the story given<br />
her complicated legacy, love story with Lennon, and unapologetic<br />
boldness she demonstrated on stage in Toronto.<br />
“… observing how it all came<br />
together is a thrilling part of<br />
the ride.<br />
Over the 50 years since the decade that transformed culture as<br />
we now know it, many moments have been recognized as the<br />
symbolic end of the idealistic ‘60s <strong>—</strong> from the police riots at the<br />
1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago to the murders<br />
of MLK and RFK to the disastrous Altamont Speedway Free<br />
Festival. Even more have been given for the end of The Beatles.<br />
The Toronto Revival invigorated Lennon with the confidence he<br />
needed to leave the group, sparking music’s greatest divorce.<br />
Given the incredible legacies swirling in Toronto during that<br />
summer of ‘69, Revival is a welcome addition to the history books<br />
and concert doc canon (and yet further required viewing for<br />
Beatles fanatics who need no convincing). Brimming with both<br />
revelry and reverence, Revival69 remembers a time when<br />
anything felt possible and arrives at a moment when we could all<br />
use a little bit of the optimism that felt so potent back then and<br />
so foreign to us now. It’s a welcome trip down a memory-holed<br />
alley of memory lane.<strong>—</strong> NICK SEIP<br />
ANOTHER BODY<br />
Sophie Compton & Reuben Hamlyn<br />
A sobering reminder of the minefield the Internet can be for<br />
women, the documentary Another Body, from filmmakers Sophie<br />
Compton and Reuben Hamlyn, is perhaps one of the more<br />
unnerving recent examples of form being shaped by subject<br />
matter. We’re introduced to college-aged engineering student<br />
“Taylor.” “Taylor” is ambitious, academically accomplished, and<br />
outwardly happy until one day she learns from an apologetic<br />
male friend that there is a video on a popular porn website which<br />
appears to feature her engaged in an explicit sexual act. “Taylor”<br />
is mortified to discover that the video is not actually her but is a<br />
deepfake. For those blessedly unfamiliar with the term,<br />
deepfakes are a controversial form of video where, using<br />
commercially available software and A.I., “regular people”<br />
(although, boy, is that a relative term) are able to create<br />
photorealistic, full-motion facsimiles of human beings appearing<br />
to say and do things that they otherwise never would. Alarm bells<br />
first sounded about this technology years ago, primarily in<br />
anticipation of it being employed to spread disinformation and<br />
potentially swing elections (Jordan Peele even made a PSA on<br />
the subject back in 2018 which made convincing use of his<br />
Obama impersonation). However, as with all emergent<br />
technology, it’s primarily been applied toward pornography. More<br />
specifically, creating reasonably convincing video clips where<br />
everyone from movie stars to politicians to amateur citizens can<br />
have their faces nonconsensually imposed upon porn actors, at<br />
which point the videos are uploaded online and viewed by<br />
millions of people.<br />
This may be the appropriate place to discuss Compton and<br />
<strong>11</strong>