29.12.2012 Views

United States Agency for International Development - (PDF, 101 mb ...

United States Agency for International Development - (PDF, 101 mb ...

United States Agency for International Development - (PDF, 101 mb ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The group defined the criteria that they will use in priority-setting (see presentation). It<br />

was also noted that the maps downloaded from the website philreefs.org. are the useful<br />

working maps <strong>for</strong> the marine group. Perry also mentioned that the marine would be<br />

divided into several taxa <strong>for</strong> the production of status reports <strong>for</strong> each taxon. Each taxon<br />

will be handled by experts involved in that particular field, <strong>for</strong> example, Dr. Rey dela Paz<br />

of DLSU and Rodolfo Reyes of IClARM will be handling the museum collections of fishes.<br />

PLANTS (Annex 20)<br />

A. Definition and Classifiwtion of Habiht Types<br />

The group assessed that the definition of SITE / HABrTAT used by the NBCPSW<br />

thematic groups should be standardized. There was a consensus that the<br />

standard type of habitat to be used should con<strong>for</strong>m to global standards but<br />

should relate to what is actually on the ground.<br />

Habitat is a primary concern of the PLANT WORKING GROUP<br />

Whitmore's classification (abridged in Fernando's report - see Annex 21) was to<br />

be adapted but refinements were discussed using the group's knowledge on<br />

existing types of vegetation in the country. Dr. Fernando's unpublished paper on<br />

Vegetation of the Philippine Islands was also an extensive contribution to the<br />

discussion.<br />

The range of habitat types used by the vertebrate group was narrowed down to<br />

only 13 major types.<br />

The thorough discussion led to the development of a paper, giving samples of<br />

the area representing each classification type and the corresponding description<br />

of the sites.<br />

B, Review and Prioritkation of Criteria<br />

Given a guide of criteria matrix developed by the Working Group Leaden from<br />

previous regional consultations, the plant group refined and clarified each<br />

criterion, taking into consideration its utility <strong>for</strong> prioritization of sites using plants<br />

as indicators.<br />

Another matrix was developed; each habitat type paired and given scores of<br />

prioritization (1 to 5 points, 1 being the highest) with each criterion (see Criteria<br />

Prioritization table in the Plant Group Workshop presentation). Further<br />

discussions gave emphasis on criteria present on-s~te and can be assessed by the<br />

experts in presence.<br />

Other criteria not given values were reserved <strong>for</strong> later fine-tuning of priorities to<br />

be used if there are sufficient data. It was recommended that all possible criteria<br />

be considered in the national workshop.<br />

C Mapphg of Data and Sources<br />

Maps of Luzon and Palawan with political boundaries were overlaid with<br />

protected-area maps to assess which (a) sites that have been well-studied and<br />

have sufficient data, (b) those that have been studied but no available literature<br />

and (c) those that have not been studied and have very limited in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

Sites of collections of each working group me<strong>mb</strong>ers were also plotted on the<br />

maps.<br />

Sources of in<strong>for</strong>mation detailed on the maps include:<br />

(a.) Published Literature (b.) Unpublished Reports (c.) Collection Reports

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!