United States Agency for International Development - (PDF, 101 mb ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A. Density = area-specific resource use; depending on its relation to population pressures and resource utilization ' RELATIVE DENSITY B. Per Capita IncomelPoverty lncidence = Scoring should be reversed as a low per capita income should indicate high priority PROPOSED CRITERIA 8 SCORING SCHEME POPULATION PRESSURE Density Migration 1 crifical 1 high net in-migration 2 high 2 moderate net in- migration 3 moderate 3 stable inad migration 4 low 4 low net out-migration 5 insignificant 5 high net out-migration There is a need fo determihe critical levels amrding fo ecobgical zone. RESOURCE UTILIZATION LSSUES Impact of resource 1 cn'tical utilization practices 2 severe 'rebtive fo a hierarchy 3 moderate of bicdivecsdy threafs 4 weak 5 insignificant Economic trends 'retafive b a hkrarchy of bicdiversrty fhreats C. Cultural Diversity = Scorlng should be reversed high priority should be given to areas with a high degree of acculturation D. conservation Initiatives and Opportunities = Scoring should be reversed to give high priority to areas with low conservation initiatives and opportunities Per capita income 1 significantly lower 2 slightly lower Poverty lncidence 3 approximates national ave. 4 slightly higher 5 significantly higher (indices relative to national standard) . Tenurial Issues 1 crifical 2 severe 3 moderate 4 weak 5 insignificant CULTURAL DIVERSITY (uniqueness and degree of norracculturationlnon-integracon) persistence of 1 insignificant customary land rights 2 weak & arrangements 3 moderate NRM practices & 4 strong beliefs (Sustainable IKS) 5 very strong POLICY HARMONIZATION Identification of models in biodiversity-related policy harmonization Identification of issues in national and local, intra- & inter-agency conflicts
3- CONSERVATION INITIATIVES & OPPORTUNlTIES Institutionalion of conservation effort 1 2 insignilicant weak (susta~ned, supported 3 by LGU & wmmunrty) 4 Communrty mgmt. 5 moderate sfrong very strong C. Mt lsarog 1. Naga City (7) 5. Goa (2) 2. Pili (4) 6. Tinambac (6) 3. Ocampo (1) 7. Calabanga (5) 4. Tigaon (3) D.NSMNP 1. Maconacon (5) 6. llagan (2) 2. Dlvilacan (6) 7. Tumaulni (4) 3. Palanan (1) 8. Cabagan (4) 4, Dinapigue (3) 9. San Pablo (4) 5. San Mariano (1) V. Remaining Tasks A. Additional Data Sources and Experts 1. Provincial Profiles 8 Dev. Plans a. Palawan- c/o Flor Leocadlo b. Reg. II - c/o Bert Arano and PASu Savella c. Reg. Ill- c/o PAWB d. Reg. IV- c/o M. Romero 2. CRMP profiles- Palawan, d o Flor 3. CBFM; NRMP -c/o Proj. Support Office DENR (Noni Tamayo) - IV. Test Cases A Mt Guitingguiting 1. Cajidiocan (2) 2 Magdiwang (3) 3. San Fernando (1) B. Mt. Makiling 1. Calamba 2 Los Banos 3. Bay 4. Alaminos 5. Sto. Tomas (1) (2) (3) (5) (4) E. Palawan 1. Busuanga (5) 13. Cagayancillo (6) 2. Coron (3) 14. Magsaysay (6) 3. Culion (4) 15. PPC (3) 4. Linapacan (4) 16. Aborlan (4) 5. El Nido (4) 17. Narra (3) 6. Taytay (1) 18. Espanola (3) 7. Sn Vicente (5) 19. Quezon (3) 8. Roxas (2) 20.Riil (4) 9. Dumaran (3) 21. Brooke's Pt (4) 10. Aracell (3) 22. Balabac (5) 11. Agutaya (5) 23. Bataraza (5) 12. Cuyo (6- 4. 1999 Forestry Statistics - FMB 5. Area Profiles of FPE, PAFFID,PCARRD 6. EIA: llagan 8 Abuan- NAPOCOR, c/o EMB B. Additional Experts 1. Oscar Balbastro- RED, NEDA Reg. IV 2. Perla Vinoro 3. Delbert Rlce - IKALAHAN Fd'n 4. Dr. Sebastlan - Phiirice -
Page 2 and 3:
United States Agency for Internatio
Page 4 and 5:
ADB ARCBC AusAid BCP BFAR BU CI Phi
Page 6 and 7:
Luzon Regional Consu/fatjon Punta B
Page 8 and 9:
preparations for the next day's pre
Page 10 and 11:
4. Policy harmonization a. identifi
Page 12 and 13:
D. Dam Ana/ysk and Va//iltion Each
Page 14 and 15:
PRESENTATIONS / MESSAGES FOR THE PR
Page 16 and 17:
National Biodiversity Conservation
Page 18 and 19:
Regional Consultation 0 bjectives m
Page 20 and 21:
, - Philippines Conservation Priori
Page 22 and 23:
Conservation Priority Setting Appro
Page 24 and 25:
PROTECTED AREAS OF LUZON, MINDORO A
Page 26 and 27:
National Biodiversity Priority-Sett
Page 28 and 29:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
. Transparent Data Gathering -
Page 39 and 40:
. - a Knowledge - HTML driven; supp
Page 41 and 42:
STATUS REPORTS OF THE WORKING GROUP
Page 43 and 44:
R Wliition ISSUES (for forest rgr~c
Page 46: What we know . . , . .'.
Page 49 and 50: I PO Blome Cad8 for Proposed rrut r
Page 51 and 52: I Inland slnk and rockf slopes Scre
Page 53: 58 Results dlobbpng or camps I ADDr
Page 62 and 63: S O U T H C H I N A S E A \ c * 15
Page 66 and 67: Threatened species by country 120 i
Page 68: Importance of habitats
Page 71 and 72: c ANNEX 10 Species Diversity. Endem
Page 73 and 74: Example Groupsfor thePhilippines I.
Page 75 and 76: .- 3 p> (.J tyizjk"tia. i ,.' 0f~~p
Page 77 and 78: a" ; 5 *" - TOTAL %20:"~:* 151~ (s$
Page 79 and 80: Male splder mire posltlon~ng for ma
Page 81 and 82: Criteria for selection of Priority
Page 83 and 84: Parashorea malaanonan - Hop cagoyan
Page 85 and 86: I Pimga geonom~omis Bccc 1 # I I I
Page 87 and 88: i Humno - Car1 Friedrich Philipp vo
Page 89 and 90: - MPA LIST: I . r - .M .a*. U - .nu
Page 91 and 92: __ _ - STATUS REPORT OF THE FRESHWA
Page 93 and 94: . . - -- - -- - . . .. . - ,. : .,&
Page 95: - SOCIO-ECON WORKING GROUP WGL: DR
Page 99 and 100: WORKSHOP OUTPUT OF THE ARTHROPOD WO
Page 101 and 102: ANNEX 17 WORKSHOP OUTPUT OF ME VERT
Page 103 and 104: THREATS Human Population High 3 Med
Page 106 and 107: List of Major River Basins in Luzon
Page 108 and 109: 1. Pressure - Threats/R&ka Dectruct
Page 111 and 112: Summary of Habitat Types - ?'- * r
Page 113 and 114: E.S. Fcmando: Vegetation of the Phi
Page 115 and 116: E.S. Fernando: Vegetation of the Ph
Page 125 and 126: Karig, D.E., Sarewitz, D.R. & G.D.
Page 127 and 128: Wyatt-Smith, J. 1949. A note on tro
Page 129: Figure Number of genera plotted aga
Page 132 and 133: Invocation Nailom1 Anthem Welcome R
Page 134 and 135: ATTACHMENT 3. EVALUATION RESULTS NA
Page 136 and 137: DIRECTORY FOR THE LUZON REGIONAL CO
Page 138 and 139: -- - - Partner Agencles 41 1~ean Ca
Page 140 and 141: BEST AVAILABLE COPY
Page 142 and 143: Plate 3. Vertebrate Working Group.
Page 144 and 145: Plate 7. Information Group and the
Page 146 and 147:
Plate 11. Insect Working Group duri
Page 148 and 149:
Plate 15. Plant working group durin
show all

United States Agency for International Development - (PDF, 101 mb ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?