Teague - Supreme Court of Texas

The opinion of the court of wppeals does not
abrogate the shtutmy appeal process for
a municipality's demotition order through the UDJ%
rather the court specikdy fails to d an evaluation
of this sepmte issue .............................................................. 17
Substantial evidence standard is not m issue as them
has never been an evdu&on of evidence
in this matter ....................................................... ,...,,.~..........,18
The City waived any alleged reqhent for a request
for writ of &&. ............................................................. .I9
11. Teagm is entitled to pursue a suit for iojlmctive and deckatmy
relief outside of the statutory scheme on the basis that the cily
ordinance and statutory fmmewurk are mcunstitutiaaal......................... ..*.20
Govemmd immunity is autoddly waived
in suits to enjoin violations of state or &ded
constitutional rights.. ............................................................. .2 1
Teague's claims for oo~~onal and dechtory
relief are properly brought under the UIDJA .......................... 22
Tmgue's constitutional d a b are not subject to any
of the mbints imposed by Chapter 214 of the Texas
Local Government Code ...................... . .......................... 23
Teague's has rsiised substantid complaints tholt the
city ordinance and underlying statutory scheme are
un-tutlonal. ...%
. ...................................................................
III. Ho1n80mer's due process rights vs. public
concerns ....................................................................................................... 29