02.01.2013 Views

The Clothed Body

The Clothed Body

The Clothed Body

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Clothed</strong> <strong>Body</strong><br />

space dedicated to Cine-Moda, seven films from the 1990s were cited as<br />

instrumental in revolutionizing the relation between fashion and cinema; a<br />

revolution that heralded the return of the ‘style film’ (see Martin & Wilkes<br />

1998) in which costume, objects and style have a central role and share,<br />

sometimes even usurp, the limelight with plot and actors.<br />

What remains of all this apart from the image on the screen? Garments<br />

from famous films are venerated and exhibited as icons or auctioned at<br />

astronomical prices: the grandiose caparisons of <strong>The</strong> Last Emperor, the red<br />

velvet dress with a minute waist worn by Michele Pfeiffer in <strong>The</strong> Age of<br />

Innocence, the magical twinkling shoe by Ferragamo in Andy Tennant’s A<br />

Cinderella Story. Or else, a style remains, with which to construct a piece<br />

of the history of the modern propensity to think through images. 7<br />

In cinema the central importance of visual signs is indisputable, even<br />

though they do not exhaust its complexity of languages, or better, the heterogeneity<br />

of cinematic language that goes to make up a film (Aumont et<br />

al. 1994). In the sign system of fashion, on the other hand, the status of<br />

the visual remains to be investigated, and thus speaking of the relation<br />

between visual semiotics and fashion becomes a sort of epistemological<br />

challenge to the history of twentieth century semiotics, especially Barthes’<br />

project of a ‘fashion system’ conceived essentially as the reduction of the<br />

garment to the word, the primacy of linguistics over semiology and of the<br />

verbal over the non-verbal. Nearly fifty years after the publication of<br />

Barthes’ work, semiotics now fully recognizes that it is possible to go<br />

beyond this project of ‘reading’ a garment only within the limits of<br />

described fashion; and this lesson has been learnt from Barthes himself!<br />

As Gianfranco Marrone writes, fashion was for Barthes ‘a type of discourse<br />

in which clothing practices, aesthetic representations and specialized<br />

utterances merged in a complex life form’ (Marrone 1998). Just as<br />

fashion is not merely the word, nor is it merely the image, even though its<br />

grip on the world comes about primarily through a visual dimension. This<br />

dimension concerns the semiotics of the styles, forms and materials of<br />

which fashion garments are made, as well as the function of fashion as a<br />

mediator between taste and received meaning, a mediation which is realized<br />

through the special relation fashion sets up between signs, sense perceptions<br />

and social discourses.<br />

Before continuing, however, I would like to clarify a few concepts.<br />

Primarily that of the ‘clothed body’ as a semiotic category epitomizing the<br />

ways in which, through its visual dimension, the subject establishes its<br />

being in the world and its appearance style (see Calefato 1986, 1992,<br />

1996). Dressing in this sense is a non-verbal language, a device for modelling<br />

the world, a form of projection and simulation, valid for both the<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!