02.01.2013 Views

The Clothed Body

The Clothed Body

The Clothed Body

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Clothed</strong> <strong>Body</strong><br />

(Barthes 1970: 107). In the West, on the other hand, it is the superabundance<br />

of signs inscribed on the face that renders them ‘intransitive’, devoid<br />

of any possible equivalence.<br />

In makeup we can identify two ways of ‘writing’ the face: the imperceptible,<br />

that concentrates on the skin to make it smoother and more luminous,<br />

and the graphic, or conspicuous, that accentuates contours and<br />

colours. <strong>The</strong> dividing line between imperceptible and graphic is by no<br />

means clear, however: a mascara may lengthen and thicken the lashes,<br />

miming an invisible naturalness, while a foundation may be particularly<br />

dense and so openly declare its presence on the face. Even curative cosmetics<br />

may have a graphic effect: for example, by restoring compactness to<br />

mature skin. And if exaggerated, with the use of sunlamps, even the<br />

‘natural’ and curative effect of a suntan may become graphic.<br />

Fashion, that legislator without laws, that sign of the times outside time,<br />

regulates the forms of cosmetic art. <strong>The</strong> ethics of fashion, which for<br />

Baudelaire resided in a taste for the ideal, has transformed that ideal into<br />

one of a replaceability of signs, not as an equal exchange, but as a ‘waiting<br />

for the next one’, according to Heidegger, given the rhythms of anticipation<br />

and fascination with the moment that go to create an ‘instantaneous’<br />

body, whose fragmentary replaceability supplants both wear-and-tear and<br />

ageing. Heidegger writes:<br />

Today being means being replaceable … in the phenomenon of fashion, toilette<br />

and ornament are no longer necessary (which is why fashion as toilette has<br />

become as obsolete as mending) but the replaceability of the model from season<br />

to season. We no longer change a garment because it is worn-out, but because it<br />

has the specific character of being the garment of the moment, waiting for the<br />

next one. (Heidegger, 1977: 107)<br />

In this economy of the body, in the eternal waiting for a replacement,<br />

mending and repairing only find a place if they challenge time. Today<br />

makeup takes this law to its extreme: not only is makeup an eternally<br />

replaceable mask in its graphic dimension, but it creates a constant structural<br />

mutability in the face, even if simply curative. A cream for wrinkles<br />

or spots, a hair dye, a vial to combat dry skin: today the challenge is to get<br />

there first, to stop time, in a state of ecstatic expectation. Will the skin dry<br />

out again if we stop using that lotion, is the natural colour of the hair<br />

peeping out at the roots? Is the artificial body perhaps menaced by nature?<br />

Or can we write the face not just with artifice, but with fatigue, wrinkles<br />

and neglect? This too is part of the game, since buffoonery, irony and selfirony<br />

all have a place in the world of fashion today.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!