06.01.2013 Views

Cover Subtitle - Working Council for Chief Financial Officers ...

Cover Subtitle - Working Council for Chief Financial Officers ...

Cover Subtitle - Working Council for Chief Financial Officers ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Illustrative Tool or Best Practice<br />

Additional Tools or Best Practices<br />

CFO1AJDG19 © 2008 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved.<br />

Key CFO Executive Board Services | 19<br />

Support on Mergers and Acquisitions<br />

Tools and best practices to help members optimize their M&A processes<br />

Opportunity<br />

Identification<br />

Partnering Decision<br />

Process Map<br />

This DuPont tool enables<br />

businesses to better<br />

evaluate new deal ideas<br />

and prospective partners<br />

by separating evaluation<br />

of the idea from the<br />

prospective partner<br />

assessment.<br />

Growth Strategy Evaluations<br />

Growth Strategy Evaluations<br />

Partnering Decision Process Map<br />

Partnering Decision Process Map<br />

External Business Development Decision Process and Deliverables<br />

External Business Development DuPont, Illustrative Decision Process and Deliverables<br />

Idea Evaluation DuPont, Illustrative<br />

Partner Evaluation<br />

Idea Evaluation Partner Evaluation<br />

Stop Build<br />

Stop<br />

Stop Build<br />

Stop<br />

Acquire<br />

Yes Yes No<br />

Acquire<br />

Should<br />

Yes Yes No<br />

JV<br />

we Should<br />

Can needed<br />

JV<br />

pursue<br />

Are barriers to<br />

we<br />

No No<br />

Can needed<br />

pursue<br />

Are barriers to<br />

capabilities be<br />

Is an optimal<br />

Yes<br />

What is the<br />

a new<br />

winning position<br />

No No<br />

capabilities be<br />

Is an optimal<br />

Yes<br />

What is the<br />

a new<br />

winning position<br />

easily built?<br />

partner available?<br />

optimal structure? Minority<br />

business<br />

insurmountable?<br />

2–4 weeks 1–2 weeks 1–2 months<br />

easily built?<br />

partner available?<br />

optimal structure? Stake Minority<br />

idea? business<br />

insurmountable?<br />

2–4 weeks 1–2 weeks 1–2 months<br />

Stake<br />

idea?<br />

Contract<br />

Contract<br />

1–2 weeks<br />

Capability Gap Assessment<br />

Partner Option Evaluation<br />

1–2 weeks<br />

Capability DuPont, Illustrative Gap Assessment<br />

Partner DuPont, Option Illustrative Evaluation<br />

Partnering Options<br />

Prospect Prospect<br />

Winning DuPont, Position Illustrative<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

DuPont, Illustrative<br />

DuPont, Partnering Illustrative Options<br />

Market Presence<br />

(1) (2)<br />

Prospect Prospect<br />

Winning Position <strong>for</strong><br />

DuPont, Illustrative<br />

Market Presence<br />

1. Ability to delivery superior<br />

(1) (2)<br />

Acquisition<br />

value to the customer<br />

1. Ability to delivery superior<br />

Joint Venture Acquisition<br />

DuPont<br />

2. Time value to achieve to the winning customer<br />

Minority Joint Stake<br />

Build Criteria<br />

position<br />

Venture<br />

DuPont<br />

DuPont<br />

2. Time to achieve winning<br />

Contractual Minority Alliance Stake<br />

DuPont, Build Illustrative Criteria<br />

3. <strong>Financial</strong> position return<br />

DuPont DuPont<br />

Contractual Alliance<br />

Winning Position<br />

Winning Position<br />

DuPont, Illustrative<br />

3. <strong>Financial</strong> return<br />

<strong>for</strong> Processes<br />

DuPont <strong>for</strong> Technology<br />

Internal development does not affect speed-<br />

4. Probability of success<br />

Partner Criteria<br />

Winning Position<br />

Winning Position to-market<br />

<strong>for</strong> Processes<br />

<strong>for</strong> Technology<br />

Internal development does not affect speed-<br />

4. Probability of success<br />

Partner Criteria<br />

to-market<br />

5. Resulting competitive<br />

A less complex arrangement is not possible<br />

Capability Criteria<br />

Learning by doing provides valuable benefi ts<br />

landscape is favorable<br />

5. Resulting competitive<br />

For an A less alliance, complex DuPont arrangement brings unique is not value possible to<br />

Capability Criteria<br />

Internal Learning development by doing adds provides scale valuable (supports benefi ts<br />

6. Compatibility landscape of is cultures favorable<br />

the partnership<br />

Opportunity must be demonstrably larger than<br />

For an alliance, DuPont brings unique value to<br />

multiple Internal projects)<br />

identifi development adds scale (supports<br />

Opportunity ed capability must gaps be demonstrably larger than<br />

6. Compatibility of cultures<br />

For an the alliance, partnership exit provisions are easily<br />

7. Partner’s degree<br />

multiple projects)<br />

implemented<br />

Needed identifi capabilities ed capability are not gapstoo<br />

distant from<br />

Internal development provides unique means<br />

of commitment<br />

For an alliance, exit provisions are easily<br />

7. Partner’s degree<br />

core<br />

implemented<br />

Needed business capabilities AND core are capabilities<br />

of attracting<br />

not too distant from<br />

Internal development talent provides unique means<br />

of commitment<br />

For an acquisition, control is essential <strong>for</strong><br />

8. Experience with alliances<br />

core business AND core capabilities<br />

of attracting talent<br />

overcoming For an acquisition, speed-to-market, control risk, is essential or<br />

If market uncertainty is high, technological<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

Technology needs <strong>for</strong> the proposed business<br />

Overall 8. Experience Assessment with and alliances<br />

technology overcoming access speed-to-market, concerns<br />

uncertainty<br />

risk, or<br />

If market must uncertainty be low (and is high, vice technological<br />

versa)<br />

are deemed Technology too needs proprietary <strong>for</strong> the to proposed share business Partner Ranking<br />

Overall Assessment and<br />

The technology cost of a collection access concerns of investment and<br />

Technology uncertainty barriers must cannot be low make (and up vice majority versa)<br />

Regulatory are deemed impediments too proprietary make it less to share desirable<br />

Partner Ranking<br />

licensing The cost arrangements of a collection does of not investment exceed JV and or<br />

of margins Technology barriers cannot make up majority to build<br />

Acceptable<br />

Regulatory impediments make it less desirable<br />

acquisition licensing cost arrangements does not exceed JV or<br />

Gaps of will margins not take longer to fi ll than rivals<br />

Unclear<br />

to build<br />

Acceptable<br />

The acquisition cost of any cost of the partnering modes does<br />

already Gaps or will just not emerging take longer in the to market fi ll than rivals<br />

Geographic barriers make building undesirable<br />

Unacceptable Unclear<br />

not exceed The cost the of size any of the opportunity partnering modes does<br />

already or just emerging in the market<br />

Geographic barriers make building undesirable<br />

Unacceptable<br />

not exceed the size of the opportunity<br />

Source: E.I. DuPont de Nemours; Corporate Strategy Board, Acquiring Growth Accelerators,<br />

Source:<br />

Washington,<br />

E.I. DuPont<br />

D.C.:<br />

de Nemours;<br />

Corporate<br />

Corporate<br />

Executive Board,<br />

Strategy<br />

2002,<br />

Board,<br />

pp.<br />

Acquiring<br />

32–33; <strong>Working</strong><br />

Growth Accelerators,<br />

<strong>Council</strong><br />

Tools to Support Line Business Decisions <strong>for</strong> <strong>Chief</strong><br />

Washington,<br />

<strong>Financial</strong><br />

D.C.:<br />

Offi cers<br />

Corporate<br />

research.<br />

Executive Board, 2002, pp. 32–33; <strong>Working</strong> <strong>Council</strong> 131<br />

Tools to Support Line Business Decisions <strong>for</strong> <strong>Chief</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> Offi cers research.<br />

131<br />

Kappa* Corporation’s<br />

Build Versus Buy<br />

Evaluation Template<br />

Merger and Acquisition<br />

Teams<br />

Supporting the Line:<br />

Finance’s Role in M&A<br />

Decision Support<br />

* Pseudonym.<br />

Complexity<br />

Complexity<br />

Due Diligence<br />

M&A Due<br />

Diligence Toolkit<br />

This toolkit provides the<br />

necessary tools to per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

due diligence, including<br />

a model confi dentiality<br />

agreement and a sample<br />

due diligence checklist.<br />

The company designates<br />

a single The company “category designates<br />

gatekeeper” a single “category responsible<br />

<strong>for</strong> gatekeeper” each category responsible of<br />

requested <strong>for</strong> each in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

category of<br />

requested in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

“Closed Loop” Due Diligence Coordination<br />

The team that reviews<br />

documents The team within that reviews each<br />

category documents reports within to that each<br />

category’s category gatekeeper.<br />

reports to that<br />

category’s gatekeeper.<br />

Each team member is<br />

charged Each team with member responsibility is<br />

<strong>for</strong> charged checking with with responsibility the<br />

“category <strong>for</strong> checking gatekeeper” with the<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e “category bringing gatekeeper” another<br />

person be<strong>for</strong>e into bringing the process. another<br />

person into the process.<br />

The Procter & Gamble<br />

Company’s M&A<br />

Planning Top Sheet<br />

Alpha* Corporation’s<br />

Data Room and Due<br />

Diligence Checklist<br />

M&A: Balancing Central<br />

Control with Business<br />

Unit Autonomy<br />

Integration<br />

Planning<br />

M&A Integration<br />

Workbook<br />

This spreadsheet-based<br />

workbook contains many<br />

of the common tasks and<br />

responsibilities owned by<br />

the fi nance function in<br />

the integration process<br />

and is designed to give<br />

chief fi nancial offi cers<br />

and other senior fi nance<br />

executives a head start<br />

with integration planning.<br />

After the Acquisition:<br />

Best Practices in Post-<br />

Merger Integration<br />

Post M&A Toolkit<br />

Salerno’s* Merger<br />

Integration Timeline<br />

Upsilon’s* IT Systems<br />

Pre-Conversion<br />

Evaluation Form<br />

Theta* Corporation’s<br />

Deal Integration<br />

Dashboard<br />

Integration<br />

Execution<br />

Integration<br />

Dashboard<br />

Company Alpha*<br />

leverages its Internetenabled<br />

project tracking<br />

system to create a<br />

monitoring mechanism<br />

that detects potential<br />

integration diffi culties<br />

early. The dashboard<br />

tracks metrics that refl ect<br />

the timeliness and quality<br />

of the integration.<br />

Capturing Value<br />

During Post-Merger<br />

Integration<br />

Sigma* Corporation’s<br />

Business Unit Post-<br />

Alliance Analysis<br />

Upsilon* Corporation’s<br />

IT Systems Post-<br />

Conversion<br />

Evaluation Form

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!