discussion

Lusut8. rik Difi€rcmq b DepBriont Ari€ty, Aglrecrioq S€lf-f,lr.en,
M.rtt l Sirilfatio! .!d Ssurl Soltlf.cti,n ol I .rtil.ebpL
253
11 @Ds to be impofi&i 10 give andion !o oduing ed significot 6pect of
ou $cicty |har tuy flouish sid cfeienc. lo th€s quhs. Most evid.nt in lnis
Fgr.d is laguage. L{lgu,g. t lls u a gut d.al about a culrG. ln @ntat io ene
otha culic, lagug€ pem€ates all pans of s@iety. Tne dsla wre frmne! &altz€d
10 s t!. inpad of laneue. oo depr€sio4 diety, *lf4tftr! a€ersion, hdilal
.!d sud sltisf&tion 6ult d dE lo infd{liry in @uplcs. Thc cfrer ol l&8uge ol
inl€dile olples on theb psycholoSical states h6 nelcr been invesriSaied 6
dbnuehly by thc cseeh6, althouS! it w6 offiderEd thar difI.Ht lsguag€s @
@dbute ro tlillFnr l€vcls of delcsion, diety, *lf€rcd, aggrBsiorr Miral
Thc sulysis sho*td th. vital rele of leguee Dorticuldly
for the m6ws of
d€p6sion, didy ad *xual saisfadior (Tsbl€ 63). Tn findings of lhe p6enl
study suSg€sted lhfi the inf.nilc coupl€s of Ud! dd Pujabi l&e!ae6 di{'ded in
l.m of dcpBiotr R4llts indicate 6ar U'{u sleting rspoftlcnts e moc likely
Io h€ deprcs!.d N @mpd.d io Pujabi spe6li.g Bpond€nrs (Table 64). The r€sults
firnha indi@l.d thal the di{fcrene in displgyi.g Miery b.tyeo Urdu ldg@ge
erc'D dd Pbjabi lesu.gc goup m higily signifi@t, *hich inpli.s th.t Urdu
sroup tpottcd noe uiery when @npaFd io Pujabi grcup (Trble 65). A ocdible
juslific{ion for this findii8 cd b. supponcd by the evid.rc 3 diswd h th€
cDftla,tion stultsis of all m6B b b. studied ir th€ pa*ni srudy dal dcprc$ion
dd uiely ec nighly rbsitively @ftlaied wilh eoch orhcr. Ir explai.s th.l people
*rD @ d.pGsed e noE likely to havc dxicty, This amplion t supDon ! by
thc fudings of cll€ t of ldguec on deprsio! and dxi.ly which suggd thal ihe