discussion

opponulty for conelion. nowver, lh. siapwis PmsNion
261
thrcugh the plotdol
q pnpel psriats .nd ftdmor $aff alik. b nove to Nc c6pld sreps wiihoul
ncppilg bact to ld.q@tely @midq thc boa&r viw of thc d.cision for qdplc,
rbe inminsly complex elhic.l dilenms, dd of the nmy l.vels of secrcy tlat
hay etrs. As thc momentum of paricDls' €morion l 4d limcial invdmenl
i@F.s, it bam6 noe dd noE difficuh to mate tbe dc.ision 1o sloP lie5rltrcnr
ln lhe qud lo hclp p.opl., we @ forg.l lhd pan of reatm.nl ddisiotu nay be
hdping individuals throus! the difrcult d4isioDs t€gddirg a possibly childlds life
i! rb. tuw. Exciling adrt]g ir kchlology hold the preni* of incF.s.d
@r.eption Er6. For mey, n oil nd rh. rcaliztior of dEir hop.s fd chil&tr
But lor ilos oabl. to @Mive elo qiih ihpnved lehnologi/, the pronise will
Fove
1o be ody d illuio., ed k may s@ a con€slonding increse in dhrcss
Ad@s itr GpFductiv€ t .hroloe/ my aflord incrEs€d @nuol ovc Fprod@don
Bul b.licf in thtu @rlrot @ pove !o be illuery for tho* unable to @neivc,
h.idlenine the dba.$ ih.y qperidce in a wdd wher€ .v.n ihc oth€E who @
infcrlil€ m 6miving. Wilh the inc@ in choia will mn. to th€ incFed budo
of choi.e, shich m.y afal lhe quality of lif€ dd psychological wn-b€ing fot
qdyoE irrolved? Psriois @ chooe th. nyle of @lBling lhil b6t sils tbcjt
n .d! wh€iha individurt @ueling colpL @weling or Smup @Deling.
The word inf.dilily hs a delstaling elleci upon @jority of individub.
Evm tho* Fopl. who wd. hjClly ad@rcd my ac@p1 n 6ion lly but ii beon6
very ditrcult for tlEn b a.ce n morioNlly. TLi. rl.rionship @ be adveely
dfl4&d paniculdly $.ir level of Mital ed exod elisfeliol Thh is
l@m@ded that parird should ot oly coDnuicate wifi each other, underst2ld
.!.h olh.ls pmblm .nd rsl€ mrFou .Lcision fd the Eelulion of dE ptubld.