Sustaining Livelihoods through Organic Agriculture in Tanzania - UMB
Sustaining Livelihoods through Organic Agriculture in Tanzania - UMB
Sustaining Livelihoods through Organic Agriculture in Tanzania - UMB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In addition to understand<strong>in</strong>g current collaboration, this exercise was deemed<br />
important for identify<strong>in</strong>g potential synergies for collaboration. Key categories of<br />
stakeholder <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Tanzania</strong>n organic sector <strong>in</strong>cluded farmer associations,<br />
cooperatives, government, government <strong>in</strong>stitutions, civil society, certification bodies,<br />
companies, and development partners.<br />
Communicat<strong>in</strong>g with stakeholders <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong> centred on identify<strong>in</strong>g and mobilis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
people who were concerned with susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture and food security,<br />
particularly those already <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> and responsible for organic agriculture. The<br />
idea was to build a "taskforce" of people who would jo<strong>in</strong> forces to analyse the current<br />
system and explore desirable and feasible alternatives.<br />
In order to build the most realistic and useful “rich picture” of the organic system, it<br />
became apparent that the research would need to address multiple scales. The ma<strong>in</strong><br />
levels of analysis chosen were the farm / local level and the national level, with the<br />
aim to bridge the micro and the macro. At the farm or local level, the ma<strong>in</strong> concerns<br />
were anticipated to be conversion constra<strong>in</strong>ts and certification arrangements, whilst<br />
the national level was expected to focus more on <strong>in</strong>stitutional factors and the policy<br />
framework, <strong>in</strong> addition to rank<strong>in</strong>g bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> the organic commodity cha<strong>in</strong>. The<br />
research could equally have chosen to consider the dynamics of organic agriculture as<br />
it is be<strong>in</strong>g developed at the district, regional or cont<strong>in</strong>ental levels.<br />
Although the research area was still extremely broad at this stage, gradually system<br />
boundaries were be<strong>in</strong>g drawn <strong>in</strong> terms of sett<strong>in</strong>g, actors, events and processes. For<br />
example, the study was conf<strong>in</strong>ed to sedentary cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems (rang<strong>in</strong>g from purely<br />
arable to mixed farm<strong>in</strong>g) either practis<strong>in</strong>g certified organic production or <strong>in</strong> the<br />
process of conversion.<br />
A CATWOE checklist was used to def<strong>in</strong>e the system <strong>in</strong> terms of:<br />
Clients – smallholder farmers<br />
Actors – farmers, researchers, government, private sector, civil society and public<br />
Transformation – transition to organic agriculture<br />
World view – susta<strong>in</strong>able agriculture<br />
Owners – farmers, researchers, government, private sector, civil society and public<br />
Environmental constra<strong>in</strong>ts – low <strong>in</strong>vestment abilities, underdeveloped markets, poor<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure, unreliable climate, antagonistic worldviews<br />
On this basis a root def<strong>in</strong>ition of the relevant human activity system emerged and was<br />
expressed as:<br />
‘<strong>Organic</strong> food and farm<strong>in</strong>g systems under the control of smallholder farmers<br />
and government agents which, <strong>in</strong> the light of f<strong>in</strong>ancial, <strong>in</strong>frastructural, market<br />
and environmental constra<strong>in</strong>ts, convert to certified organic production with the<br />
aim of improv<strong>in</strong>g system susta<strong>in</strong>ability, food security and self-reliance’.<br />
In addition, expected outputs and <strong>in</strong>dicators were devised. The outputs <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
strengthen<strong>in</strong>g and facilitat<strong>in</strong>g the national umbrella organisation for organic<br />
agriculture, the <strong>Tanzania</strong> <strong>Organic</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong> Movement (TOAM), provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>puts<br />
for an organic policy, participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> knowledge-shar<strong>in</strong>g and advocacy actions.<br />
Realis<strong>in</strong>g the weaknesses of the current organic sector led to the realisation that<br />
capacity-build<strong>in</strong>g and awareness creation were priority areas for the research to focus<br />
upon.<br />
28