11.01.2013 Views

Brushstrokes - October 2011 - Surface Coatings Association of New ...

Brushstrokes - October 2011 - Surface Coatings Association of New ...

Brushstrokes - October 2011 - Surface Coatings Association of New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4a – test results for 7% TiO2 formulation<br />

7% Titan<br />

7% Titan<br />

+ 20%<br />

Binder<br />

was given by the complex carbonate extender. As may be expected<br />

the brightness <strong>of</strong> the coatings containing 7% TiO2 was higher than<br />

those containing 3.5% TiO2, although in reality the difference was<br />

on average only half a point. Gloss measurements were also very<br />

similar for all samples ranging from 2.4 to 3.8. All coating would<br />

be suitable for low sheen applications.<br />

The variation in contrast ratio was far greater, ranging from<br />

a low <strong>of</strong> 90.1 to a high <strong>of</strong> 96.2. Once again the complex<br />

carbonate formulations had the highest value in all test series,<br />

in some cases by a significant margin, being at least two points<br />

above the average value for each series <strong>of</strong> tests. The results<br />

for the fine GCC and the PCC were very similar and it would be<br />

difficult to place one above the other in terms <strong>of</strong> contrast ratio.<br />

The lowest contrast ratio was given by the hydrous and calcined<br />

kaolins which were also very similar. In terms <strong>of</strong> particle size<br />

and shape the hydrous kaolin was closest in morphology to<br />

the complex carbonate, however the results show it is not as<br />

effective as the complex carbonate as a TiO2 extender.<br />

There was some variation between the contrast ratio <strong>of</strong> the<br />

higher and lower TiO2 contents. Increasing the level <strong>of</strong> extender<br />

and reducing the level <strong>of</strong> TiO2 gave a higher contrast ratio for<br />

the complex carbonate, fine GCC and hydrous kaolin while a<br />

lower value for PCC and calcined kaolin.<br />

The area which showed the greatest difference between the<br />

complex carbonate and the other extenders was viscosity.<br />

The GCC, PCC and hydrous kaolin give reasonably similar<br />

viscosities, however the complex carbonate gives a noticeably<br />

higher viscosity and the calcined kaolin a noticeably lower<br />

viscosity. The highly thixotropic nature <strong>of</strong> dispersions<br />

containing the complex carbonate can be an advantage in that<br />

settling is less pronounced and thickener levels can reduced. If<br />

lower viscosities are required then subsequent work has shown<br />

that alternative combinations <strong>of</strong> dispersant and thickener are<br />

Portafill H5 Fine GCC PCC Hydrous Kaolin Calcined Kaolin<br />

Brightness L* 95.8 95.0 95.4 94.9 95.4<br />

CR/% 96.4 92.4 92.5 92.4 90.1<br />

Gloss 85° 2.8 2.4 3.2 2.5 2.6<br />

Viscosity100rpm/cP 2640 1880 2040 1680 1240<br />

Viscosity10rpm/cP 14000 7200 7600 7200 4400<br />

Brightness L* 95.8 95.3<br />

CR/% 95.9 94.9<br />

Gloss 85° 2.6 2.7<br />

Table 4b – test results for 3.5% TiO2 formulation<br />

3.5% Titan<br />

3.5% Titan<br />

+ 10%<br />

Binder<br />

Portafill H5 Fine GCC PCC Hydrous Kaolin Calcined Kaolin<br />

Brightness L* 95.6 94.5 95.1 94.4 94.8<br />

CR/% 95.2 94.3 91.1 92.2 92.0<br />

Gloss 85° 3.6 3.4 3.8 2.9 2.9<br />

Viscosity100rpm/cP 3600 1880 1680 1920 1160<br />

Viscosity10rpm/cP 21200 7600 5600 9200 2000<br />

Brightness L* 93.2 94.4 94.4 94.1<br />

CR/% 94.5 92.0 90.3 91.5<br />

Gloss 85° 3.2 3.1 2.8 3.1<br />

effective in controlling the rheological behaviour.<br />

The relatively low viscosity <strong>of</strong> the mixes containing the calcined<br />

kaolin, despite the highest oil absorption, may be further<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> the difficulty in deagglomerating the material and<br />

achieving a fine dispersion. This in turn would account for the<br />

poor performance in terms <strong>of</strong> contrast ratio.<br />

Conclusions<br />

SSME’s complex carbonate extender is an ultrafine, platy<br />

extender and has been compared in this series <strong>of</strong> tests against<br />

ultrafine carbonate extenders and ultrafine platy extenders.<br />

Overall the results show that it works well as a TiO2 extender,<br />

brightness in the test formulations was slightly better than<br />

the competitive materials however the most important result<br />

was contrast ratio. In formulations above critical PVC it is<br />

relatively easy to achieve a good brightness using white fillers<br />

but dry hiding power can be difficult to maintain as TiO2<br />

levels are reduced. This work shows that increasing the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> the complex carbonate extender in a formulation allows<br />

the TiO2 level to be reduced while actually increasing the<br />

dry hiding power to a level not achieved by other fillers. This<br />

has advantages both in terms <strong>of</strong> cost reduction and quality<br />

improvement. In addition the rheological behaviour makes this<br />

extender highly suitable for viscous materials such as sealants,<br />

underbody coatings and putties.<br />

References<br />

1. Titanium dioxide price pressure, Industrial Minerals, March 2009<br />

2. Titanium dioxide market most “buoyant” for a decade, Industrial<br />

Minerals, Jan <strong>2011</strong><br />

3. The Effect <strong>of</strong> Fine Particle Size Extenders and Entrapped Air on TiO2<br />

in Emulsion Paints, Paul F. Dietz, PCI Magazine, September 2003.<br />

Contact details<br />

Simon Bussell, Sibelco Europe, Brookside Hall, Sandbach,<br />

Cheshire, UK. Contact: Simon.bussell@sibelco.com,<br />

Ph: +44 1270 752914, +44 7889 057206<br />

SURFACE COATINGS ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!