Fruit and vegetable consumption and waste in Australia - VicHealth
Fruit and vegetable consumption and waste in Australia - VicHealth
Fruit and vegetable consumption and waste in Australia - VicHealth
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
system currently <strong>in</strong>hibits data aggregation <strong>and</strong> that, because of the highly perishable<br />
nature of fruit <strong>and</strong> <strong>vegetable</strong>s, the pressure to quickly clear product <strong>in</strong> markets with many<br />
suppliers <strong>and</strong>/or buyers challenges the adequacy of <strong>in</strong>formation transfer between sectors.<br />
As a result, the report suggests that certa<strong>in</strong> participants <strong>in</strong> the system preserve ‘gate<br />
keep<strong>in</strong>g’ roles <strong>and</strong> hold <strong>in</strong>formation, prevent<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> signals from reach<strong>in</strong>g suppliers<br />
<strong>and</strong> h<strong>in</strong>der<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation. For fresh fruit <strong>and</strong> <strong>vegetable</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>, this role is primarily<br />
held by category managers to the major supermarkets (Spencer & Kneebone, 2007).<br />
Major Forces on the Food System<br />
The future of the <strong>Australia</strong>n food supply system is likely to be strongly <strong>in</strong>fluenced by a<br />
number of major forces. The primary drivers, as outl<strong>in</strong>ed by DAFF <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Australia</strong>n Food<br />
Statistics 2007 report are noted below (DAFF, 2008):<br />
� Chang<strong>in</strong>g global economics: There is a strong <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> for basic<br />
food commodities from develop<strong>in</strong>g countries paired with supply constra<strong>in</strong>ts result<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from resource competition. Increas<strong>in</strong>g prosperity <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries is lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
ris<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> for food, especially resource-<strong>in</strong>tensive animal products. At the same<br />
time, subsidized production of biofuels <strong>in</strong> the US, Europe <strong>and</strong> Brazil is caus<strong>in</strong>g food<br />
production to compete with fuel production for l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
� Advanc<strong>in</strong>g technologies: New technologies <strong>in</strong> the food system usually lead to both<br />
better productivity <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased product functionality. The impact of new<br />
technologies is dependent on their uptake by food system participants <strong>and</strong> their<br />
acceptance by consumers.<br />
� Climate variability: Chang<strong>in</strong>g climate patterns as a result of anthropogenic global<br />
warm<strong>in</strong>g are likely to create relative advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages for various<br />
agricultural regions. This leads to <strong>in</strong>creased costs for most production systems <strong>and</strong><br />
market volatility. Producers are faced with a risk of loss of markets as a result of<br />
unreliability of supply.<br />
� Shift<strong>in</strong>g trade <strong>and</strong> social policies: Soften<strong>in</strong>g barriers to <strong>in</strong>ternational trade, such as<br />
gradual reductions <strong>in</strong> tariffs, is lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>creased globalization of food production<br />
<strong>and</strong> retail markets. In addition, closer scrut<strong>in</strong>y of food producer’s budget outlays may<br />
lead to reductions <strong>in</strong> government assistance.<br />
� Increas<strong>in</strong>g consumer <strong>and</strong> community dem<strong>and</strong>s: Dem<strong>and</strong> for nutritious foods is<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g worldwide <strong>and</strong> consumers are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> food products that<br />
promote healthy lifestyles. At the same time, consumers are dem<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g more<br />
assurances on food safety <strong>and</strong> accountability of environmental impact of food<br />
production systems.<br />
� Peak oil <strong>and</strong> a carbon-constra<strong>in</strong>ed economy: Not mentioned by DAFF, but also a<br />
critical issue to the food supply is that of ‘peak oil’. Increases <strong>in</strong> oil prices create<br />
shocks <strong>and</strong> ripples through the whole economy. As the price of oil rises <strong>and</strong><br />
fluctuates, food prices will also oscillate <strong>and</strong> it may become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult for<br />
participants at the early stages <strong>in</strong> the supply system (e.g. producers) to make a liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(Campbell, 2008).<br />
� Ris<strong>in</strong>g control of retailers: Also not mentioned <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Australia</strong>n Food<br />
Statistics 2007 report, but highlighted <strong>in</strong> the FoodMap report are the impacts of the<br />
application of supply system management strategies by the major <strong>Australia</strong>n retail<br />
groups. This vertical control of the market affects the whole food system. Suppliers<br />
<strong>Fruit</strong> <strong>and</strong> Vegetable Consumption <strong>and</strong> Waste <strong>in</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> 10