Biometrics - Buro Jansen & Janssen

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Disasters Another recent application of the VeriChip is in the field of the mortuary science. In order to obtain the remains of your loved oneʹs quickly and bring closure, the RFID chip could help morticians match and identify victims faster and get their remains back to the family. This is especially an interesting application with environmental disasters occur, such as Katarina. The VeriChip can be used to keep track of human remains, speed up the morgue management and reduce morticiansʹ errors. 3.19 Company VeriChip provides security solutions for organisations/ companies. Their applications make them predominant in RFID solutions provider in the healthcare industry. These technologies identify and locate people by infant protection, wander prevention, asset tracking and patient identification applications. VeriChip systems have been installed in over 4000 locations worldwide in various sectors, such as in healthcare, security, industrial and government market. They are the first in the world making RFID for people. As VeriChip states, “their roots trace back to the events of September 11 2001, when New York firemen were writing their badge ID numbers on their chests in case they were found injured or unconscious. It was evident that there was a desperate need for personal information in emergency situations and that an injectable RFID microchip could help patients [VeriChip Corporation, May 2007]”. In December 2001 VeriChip was created to produce and market the implantable device [also known as VeriChip]. In December 2004, the company received approval from the United States Food and Drugs Administration [FDA] for the device in medical applications [FDA, 2004]. Two medical centres Beth Israel Deaconess and Hackensack University have agreed to use the technology in their emergency departments. VeriChip fulfils its leadership position as the world’s first RFID company for people offering a wide range of RFID solutions: implantable, wearable and attachable. They produce human‐implantable RFID microchips to active RFID tag with skin sensing capabilities. In April 2004 the wearable RFID innovation had been developed especially for infant protection, wander prevention and asset tracking. It is a non‐implantable RFID technology. In June 2005 a vibration monitoring system for regulated vibration control had been acquired. VeriChip is majority‐owned by Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach, Florida. It trades on the NASDAQ under the symbol “CHIP”. According to an article the United Sated currently has 50 people with a VeriChip implant. This is very low; however worldwide there are hundreds of people chipped. The VeriChip corporation ships more and more to hospitals and businesses, the number of VeriChip implants will continue to grow. 35
3.20 Vulnerabilities of Biometric Technologies False Acceptance and False Rejection Imagine a situation in which different individuals are granted access to some area and some are not. In order to gain access to that particular area one needs biometric data from an individual, which is compared with biometric data from a previously enrolled individual and next a decision is made whether or not to grant access [Simpson, I., p.4‐5, 2006, Langenderfer, J., Linnhoff, S., p.326, 2005, Fleming, S.T., p.121‐124, 2003] . If a biometric has been registered for that individual and the feature matches with sample presented, then access should be granted, otherwise not. The most optimal biometric technology would be one which always correctly identifies an individual. However to come close to the best performing systems one should consider speed and accuracy. Moreover this process does not always go as smooth as it should. When using a biometric technology, there are two types of errors involved: 1. False rejection: this is when a person is wrongly denied access 2. False acceptance: this means when an impostor is accepted by the biometric technology False Rejection A false rejection [or false negative] is a situation where an individual presents their biometric data and the device does not match correctly with the enrolled data. This could occur if there is a major change in the form of the biometric since enrolment, imprecise measurement by the device or a major difference in the environment during the enrolment and acquisition process. This false rejection is particularly inconvenient for the individual concerned. Usually one would need to repeat the presentation of the biometric, multiple times, before the correct match is obtained or in more extreme situations one would have to repeat the enrolment process to have their data restored in the system. False Acceptance A more serious situation is that of a false acceptance [or false positive]. In such a situation a person is granted access, where he or she should not be allowed. This leads to a system failure, breach of the security system and a situation one wants to avoid. For example with a fingerprint scanner comparing a greater number of minutiae would tend to have a more accurate match, comparing fewer minutiae would result in a less precise match. It is of great importance that the false acceptance rate should be reduced, so that the potential for breaches of security are reduced. This is usually done at the expense of the individualʹs convenience. The end‐users may have to present biometric data multiple times for authentication or repeatedly enrol biometric data. The level of inconvenience could impact the usability of the system in terms of user satisfaction. 36
Page 2 and 3: Biometrics: the Solution for a Safe
Page 4 and 5: Content Foreword...................
Page 6 and 7: Abstract We can see an increased us
Page 8 and 9: 1.3 Current Situation In order to u
Page 10 and 11: Looking from this viewpoint one can
Page 12 and 13: • What kind of feeling does it gi
Page 14 and 15: created a potential increase of sur
Page 16 and 17: In the name of terrorism certain va
Page 18 and 19: process of identification and authe
Page 20 and 21: these security systems, they are no
Page 22 and 23: 3.3 Security Procedures Biometrics
Page 24 and 25: hundred suspects. There are several
Page 26 and 27: passport photos for future use. In
Page 28 and 29: per visitor, if there are several s
Page 30 and 31: Smart cards are also introduced as
Page 32 and 33: first person to explore RFID in his
Page 34 and 35: that they will communicate with any
Page 38 and 39: Comparison of Techniques Here is an
Page 40 and 41: 4 Methodology 4.1 Qualitative Resea
Page 42 and 43: Beach Club, I was able to interview
Page 44 and 45: • Most of the respondents didn’
Page 46 and 47: Secure Access Road B.V. usually imp
Page 48 and 49: scan”. Another boy also said: “
Page 50 and 51: 5.2 De Fakkel Swimming Culture The
Page 52 and 53: pool in Ridderkerk a small town clo
Page 54 and 55: Is the card also used for marketing
Page 56 and 57: Respondent 4: “I don’t have any
Page 58 and 59: What do you think about the biometr
Page 60 and 61: municipalities, with about 85.000 i
Page 62 and 63: How many people have the chip impla
Page 64 and 65: Client Clarissa Slingerland does th
Page 66 and 67: “We are open from Thursdays until
Page 68 and 69: How many people got themselves chip
Page 70 and 71: 2. The exercise of total state cont
Page 72 and 73: Bentham’s and Foucault’s want t
Page 74 and 75: evaluations, populist reinforcement
Page 76 and 77: complex world. Categories of race,
Page 78 and 79: though that wealth gives access to
Page 80 and 81: technologies such as: internet prio
Page 82 and 83: offender, but rather wants to secur
Page 84 and 85: iometric data is their irrevocabili
Page 86 and 87:
duration of the phone call. In the
Page 88 and 89:
ordinary merchants and nonprofits s
Page 90 and 91:
these databases and help make promo
Page 92 and 93:
since we are monitored, classified,
Page 94 and 95:
discussion and going into a dialogu
Page 96 and 97:
Literature Agre, P., [2003], ‘Sur
Page 98 and 99:
Haaster van, F. [2003],ʹKennismaki
Page 100 and 101:
Putte van der, T. & Keuning, J. [20
Page 102 and 103:
Appendices Interviews Suppliers Int
Page 104 and 105:
In this system the face scan is use
Page 106 and 107:
We are not allowed to share the dat
Page 108 and 109:
At Charles de Gaulle one was forced
Page 110 and 111:
Biometrics are used for access cont
Page 112 and 113:
When we think of the London bombing
Page 114 and 115:
The concept works in three stages:
Page 116 and 117:
several clubs have approached us an
Page 118 and 119:
Normal people; boys, girls, fashion
Page 120 and 121:
Interview with Patrick Vermeulen- M
Page 122 and 123:
15. Bezoekers worden kenbaar gemaak
Page 124 and 125:
32. Elke keer wordt ook gesproken o
Page 126 and 127:
- Ik moest mijn wijsvinger eroplegg
Page 128 and 129:
kom best vaak ±30 keer per jaar. 5
Page 130 and 131:
13. Naar Hollywood in Rotterdam, so
Page 132 and 133:
5. Ik vind het systeem erg goed - v
Page 134 and 135:
11. Het is handig, omdat ze kunnen
Page 136 and 137:
Wel irritant als je hier niet kan z
Page 138 and 139:
Respondent 6 ‐ vrouw 1. Ridderker
Page 140 and 141:
13. Ik vind het beetje doorgeslagen
Page 142 and 143:
Is wel beter, maar echt voor de erg
Page 144 and 145:
Irving got himself chipped to be an
Page 146 and 147:
Since the opening of the Baja, 11 y
Page 148 and 149:
We have the system here since Octob
Page 150:
21. When did you get yourself chipp
show all

Biometrics - Buro Jansen & Janssen

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?